A shooting erupted during a large fight in a nightlife district near the University of Iowa campus, leaving three students wounded early Sunday, police and university officials said.
No arrests had been made as of Sunday morning, according to a campus alert.
164
Vercentorix3 days ago
+149
Calling the IC PedMall downtown the "nightlife district" is doing some heavy lifting.
149
ThaGenderOffender3 days ago
+43
i live in iowa city, this was scary to wake up to
43
ImStillExcited3 days ago
+3
Do you know what bars it was near?
3
Ryanthln-2 days ago
+2
Right outside ReUnion
2
yourlittlebirdie2 days ago
+26
If this were most countries, this would have been a big fistfight, at worst a stabbing of one or two people. Guns make every conflict so much more dangerous, for those involved and for bystanders too.
26
rustytromboneXXx2 days ago
+8
If the yanks wanted change they would have got it. Greatest democracy etc.
Tbh I don’t even know why these make the Us news, so normal.
8
NiobiumThorn2 days ago
+8
Harsh but fair
8
TwoPoundzaSausage2 days ago
+1
Americans are hustlers. If we made every gun in the United States illegal tomorrow, a multibillion dollar black market industry would spring up essentially overnight. There are a ton of retired machinists whose social security checks just aren't meeting their living expenses who would absolutely manufacture untraceable non-serialized firearms, no questions asked, for cash under the table.
1
hyungguwu1 day ago
+2
I live in Florida now but am from the Iowa City area. You never think that this is going to happen where you live, I grew up thinking Iowa City was a pretty boring place compared to most cities. I hope that all of the victims involved will be okay. These people are my age and should have their whole lives ahead of them.
2
leohat3 days ago
+5
But but but moar guns make moar safer.
5
xExerionx3 days ago
+4
Just another day in the USA
4
ram_fl_beach3 days ago
+6
The second amendment kills more of us.
6
tehfireisonfire2 days ago
-3
Genuinely curious, what gun control would fix issues like this? In Czechia the gun laws are LOOSER then the US but you don't see nearly as much gun violence. NYC for example has the strictest gun laws in the US by a huge margin, but the handgun crime rates there are still sky high? Why is that the case when it is already a felony to simply touch a handgun in ny without a pistol permit which takes well over 2 years to obtain? What laws would fix the gun crimes in nyc if the strictest laws in the country aren't already doing that
-3
DeadGuyInRoom42 days ago
+19
The gun crimes rates in NYC are not, in fact, sky high, as compared to other U.S. cities.
19
tehfireisonfire2 days ago
Ok cool, it still has some of the highest gun murders per capita of all the large cities in the western hemisphere. But it also has by far the strict gun laws in the US. So again why are it's gun crime rates still that high? Surely all the gun control should have stopped it right?
0
viola-purple3 days ago
-30
Another school day in the US
-30
SweetAlyssumm3 days ago
+98
It was in a bar. Horrible but not a school shooting.
98
viola-purple3 days ago
-150
Yet campus. It actually doesn't matter, there's shootings daily in the USA.
-150
KimJongFunk3 days ago
+92
This was a shooting in the downtown district where bars are located.
I understand your criticism of US gun culture, but criticize us for the right reasons instead of conjecture.
92
IPissExcellentThrows3 days ago
+68
When I move the goalposts and still get it wrong
68
Wintersage73 days ago
+26
It was actually in the Ped Mall, not on campus.
26
posthuman042 days ago
+12
It wasn’t a school day, either
12
Historical_Lynx_26743 days ago
+26
No one dead. Yay.
26
StarsapBill3 days ago
+16
The mass shooting this morning that killed 8 children did though.
16
viola-purple3 days ago
-4
That's a good outcome
-4
Spaduf3 days ago
-3
I don't think that's right I'm afraid.
-3
GuaranteedCougher3 days ago
+38
This was off campus at night. The headline just mentions the nearby campus to make it more interesting. A shooting in a college town isn't necessarily a school shooting. This just seems like an after barclose shooting which happens more often in bigger cities
38
GlenBaileyWalker3 days ago
-13
By nearby campus, they mean across the street from the campus. They specifically mention the ped mall which is roughly 500 feet from the campus.
-13
perenniallandscapist3 days ago
-24
They might as well have said that a shooting doesn't count as a school shooting if its only in the parking lot. Close enough for me. Still sad that we just dismiss shootings quite generally.
-24
posthuman042 days ago
+1
Well except it almost certainly wasn’t about academics or targeting the school. Like previous incidents in downtown Iowa City it’s likely people from out of town doing their business in popular off campus bars.
1
igetproteinfartsHELP3 days ago
+26
This was not a school shooting.
26
Gadshill3 days ago
+13
It happened at night on the weekend.
> Nightlife district near the University of Iowa campus wounded five people early Sunday
13
viola-purple3 days ago
-36
So they were lucky that most were asleep...
-36
Gadshill3 days ago
+8
Sort of depends on what type of college student you are.
8
posthuman042 days ago
+3
Nobody goes to those bars for school related reasons. Even if it were midday, midweek it still wouldn’t be a campus or school related shooting
3
RobertWayneLewisJr3 days ago
+11
Brother, it's sunday
11
viola-purple1 day ago
+1
And? Besides I'm not a man
1
Yarusenai3 days ago
+2
It's Sunday
2
viola-purple1 day ago
+1
I don't have their impression that in the US people make a difference regarding when they shoot people
1
gtindolindo3 days ago
+1
Isn't it Sunday tho? No churches today / (yet).
1
RobutNotRobot2 days ago
+1
Mid-April...the official mass shooting season has begun.
1
Couffere13 hr ago
+1
Not a lot of details in the posted link. More details here [https://dailyiowan.com/2026/04/19/3-ui-students-injured-in-downtown-shooting-investigation-ongoing/](https://dailyiowan.com/2026/04/19/3-ui-students-injured-in-downtown-shooting-investigation-ongoing/)
1
cwweydert2 days ago
-2
If only something could be done…tots n pears
-2
DeadGuyInRoom42 days ago
+1
But the roadside signs in the rural Midwest told me guns prevent crime and save lives… are you telling me they lied?!
1
tehfireisonfire2 days ago
-4
Genuinely curious, what gun control would fix issues like this? In Czechia the gun laws are LOOSER then the US but you don't see nearly as much gun violence. NYC for example has the strictest gun laws in the US by a huge margin, but the handgun crime rates there are still sky high? Why is that the case when it is already a felony to simply touch a handgun in ny without a pistol permit which takes well over 2 years to obtain? What laws would fix the gun crimes in nyc if the strictest laws in the country aren't already doing that
-4
DeadGuyInRoom42 days ago
+3
Strict gun laws aren’t nearly as effective when you can simply drive to a place with looser regulations to get them. An illustrative example of this is Mexico. Mexican citizens have a constitutional right to own guns, and they have tight gun regulations, and only 2 gun stores. Cities closest to US ports of entry have the highest gun crime rates in Mexico, because the vast majority of guns used in crimes there come from the U.S.
That said, NYC crime rates are continuously declined since their peak in the 90s, and are lower than many other major cities. New York State had the 3rd lowest gun death rate in the country in 2023, and the city is at this point ranked in the top 15% safest in the U.S. for gun violence.
3
tehfireisonfire2 days ago
-4
I'm using handguns as the example here because there are already federal laws that *should* prevent people from nyc from getting handguns. It is a felony to buy a handgun outside your state of residence, so what more gun laws would prevent the nyc gun violence?
-4
TwoPoundzaSausage2 days ago
-1
> Strict gun laws aren’t nearly as effective when you can simply drive to a place with looser regulations to get them.
This statement belies the fact that you have never purchased a gun before, or you don't know the laws. If you purchase a gun in another state, you have to show ID. When you show ID, the firearms dealer runs your info through a background check, which takes into account your state of residence. If you attempt to purchase something that is illegal to possess in your state, the sale is flagged. All gun sales in the US must follow the applicable laws of the home state of the purchaser.
An illustrative example of this is Mexico.
Non-citizens are outright forbidden from purchasing guns unless they have at least a green card and an active hunting license, and even then they are severely limited in the number of guns they can buy. You can all but guarantee that no Mexican citizen is coming up to the US to buy a bunch of guns to take back to Mexico.
>Cities closest to US ports of entry have the highest gun crime rates in Mexico, because ~~the vast majority of guns used in crimes there come from the U.S.~~ of the Drug trade and fighting over control of smuggling routes.
-1
DeadGuyInRoom41 day ago
+1
Straw purchasers buy them in the U.S. and smuggle them to Mexico. At least [70%](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/08/25/american-guns-help-arm-mexican-drug-cartels-including-cjng/5586129001/) (and some estimates put the number closer to 90%) of illegal guns seized at crime scenes in Mexico originated in American gun shops. That is fact.
1
Riptide3603 days ago
-11
Congress can’t pass gun control because Republicans get paid off to say thoughts & prayers. https://youtu.be/oTkvNmUcecU?si=KZNlknewmySmlW4b
-11
FrenchDipFellatio3 days ago
+22
Everytown (founded by billionaire michael bloomberg) and similar groups actually [outspend the NRA](https://thereload.com/gun-control-groups-outraise-opponents-in-final-report-before-election-day/) now
22
da_chicken3 days ago
+4
And gun companies lobby against it because very time these tragedies happen, their sales of ammunition spike hard.
4
No-Meringue-73173 days ago
-3
Congress can’t pass gun Control because it is infringement and unconstitutional. It’s not a right vs left debate
-3
[deleted]2 days ago
[deleted]
0
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+11
You’re suggested regulated in the context of 2A was written means government regulation? Oh boy lol
11
ToxicJolt1242 days ago
-6
What do you think it means?
-6
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+6
What do you mean what do *I* think? The constitution says that means “well functioning”, “working smoothly”. I know it’s hard to fathom, but words 200 years ago change meaning in the legal framework
6
[deleted]2 days ago
-2
[deleted]
-2
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+2
That’s why the supreme count exists, genius
2
ToxicJolt1242 days ago
-2
I’m not talking to you about the Supreme Court. You said that the constitution provides context for the word Regulate, which it definitively does not.
-2
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+5
This is clearly a troll or rage bait.
5
Disastrous_Mouse_1123 days ago
-3
The government already “infringes” on the right to bear arms, for example automatic machine guns, the question is where is the line, and that is a left vs right issue
-3
ItemEven64213 days ago
-20
We need to repeal the 2A
-20
No-Meringue-73173 days ago
-11
So you want a society where the strong and gang can prey on the weak and elderly?
-11
ItemEven64212 days ago
+3
No, thats not how that works
3
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
-2
How does it work then?
-2
ItemEven64212 days ago
+2
Like the rest of the free world
Im not suggesting a gunless society
2
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
-1
You’re never truly free if you don’t have a 2A type right. Keep dreaming, sheep
-1
ItemEven64212 days ago
+4
Thats not true in the slightest
Im not the sheep here mi boi
4
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+3
So let me ask you this: I’m sure based on your rhetoric, you despise and condemn the current US administration. Youre completely ok with them holding all of the power and firearms available? Also how would you enforce this 100% confiscation disarmament effort?
3
ItemEven64212 days ago
+2
Thats not what i said, I don't believe in a gunless society
2
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+1
Good thing you have no influence on policy
1
M4DM1ND2 days ago
+4
Having the "ability" to fight against a corrupt government is such a worthless counterpoint in the modern era. You think a bunch of hillbillies with their glocks and hunting rifles would be able mount a rebellion against the government? Maybe in 1800s, when it happened last time. There's literally 0 chance that you owning a gun would make a difference in this scenario.
4
No-Meringue-73172 days ago
+1
Damn you’re right - whatever you say really has no impact on anything. We should repeal the 1st amendment
1
ToxicJolt1242 days ago
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”
The actual amendment makes a lot of sense. People just act like the first part doesn’t exist because of D.C. v. Heller
0
ItemEven64212 days ago
+1
No it doesn't, thats why it's practically unique
1
InfiniteOctave3 days ago
-17
Shot but not killed....clearly the shooter wasn't a hawkeye.
80 Comments