"While Hezbollah held its fire during that period, Jihad says they never disarmed. He says they pointed Lebanese soldiers to disused, defunct or damaged old stockpiles they no longer needed, and let them confiscate those. But Hezbollah's real arsenal was largely untouched, he says.
"They didn't confiscate anything! We gave them empty boxes, or a few old items to go blow up," he explains."
264
Software_Dependent15 hr ago
+236
And then they complain that they get bombed.
Or a whole load of innocent people that want to get on with their lives get caught in the shit storm.
236
HigherandHigherDown9 hr ago
+26
Lebanon needs to forcefully disarm and disband them for any real peace.
26
itspronouncedbolonya8 hr ago
+3
Their army'sweakee than hezbollah
3
Axerin15 hr ago
-142
Maybe they shouldn't be bombing a whole load of innocent lives so indiscriminately then.
-142
xmuskorx9 hr ago
+15
if they target Hezbollah locations/fighters/weapons, that sounds like the opposite of "indiscriminately."
Do words mean anything anymore?
15
Dry-Leave20034 hr ago
+1
NPR sadly heading toward Pravda territory with pieces like this.
The framing and minimization of Hezbos actual indiscriminate attacks and their current level of decimation is hard to take seriously. In the writer’s defense, strict Hezbo editing of the proposed article was probably a prerequisite for an interview.
1
TheGazelle14 hr ago
+72
But it's totally fine when hezbollah tries to do the same to Israeli lives?
Or do those not matter to you?
72
tundra44515 hr ago
+101
rain history party vanish upbeat silky salt grab summer crush
101
Axerin15 hr ago
-132
All I see are excuses to justify war crimes for the "greater-Israel" agenda.
-132
ComprehensiveLaw101215 hr ago
+91
He ironically says to justify the war crime of terrorists embedding and firing from civilian infrastructure.
Great job, sport.
91
Axerin15 hr ago
-84
Terrorists are gonna do terrorist things. So unless you want to be counted alongside the ranks of Russia and Iran be my guest. Great job so far, you guys are actually way ahead anyway.
-84
ComprehensiveLaw101215 hr ago
+72
You started off saying they're bombing indiscriminately, and then transitioned to acknowledging Hezbollah operates out of civilian neighborhoods and structures. Ergo, it's obviously not indiscriminate at all.
Happy to help. You seem very confused by your own bile.
72
Software_Dependent15 hr ago
+39
Amazing. What is your solution?
And don't just say something dumb such as get rid of Israel as they will drop a nuke before they let that happen.
I am not supporting anyone here, it's just that people are quick to point fingers but very slow to come up with anything else.
39
Axerin15 hr ago
-8
How about starting with not bombing and wiping out entire towns and villages.
The whole invasion of southern Lebanon in the 80s is what led to the creation of Hezbollah in the first place. The more they do this the more Hezbollah is justified and gains more support and recruits. But the Israeli regime under Netanyahu just wants perpetual war to hide its own corruption and ineptitude.
-8
BBorc15 hr ago
+36
Why did Israel invade Lebanon olin the 80s?
36
Software_Dependent14 hr ago
+29
Why did they invade southern Lebanon in 1982?
Please explain.
It's just the same thing going around, a differently named group doing attacks and vice versa again and again.
Interestingly not Lebanon attacking Israel, just their sovereignty being ignored by proxy army.
Additionally, Hezbollah doesn't just attack Israel, they helped slaughter thousands in Syria helping Assad.
29
vincentveganvega15 hr ago
+42
You act like it’s just a few guys. It’s a f****** army of 100,000 Hezbollah fighters. You dumbass
42
Mike_Milburys_Shoe_14 hr ago
+14
What’s it like to be legitimately braindead
14
bb0yer15 hr ago
+68
So Hezbollah can commit war crimes but Israel cant defend itself?
68
booty_explorer_25115 hr ago
+53
Yes, ultimately it's the goal of whoever funding these bots.
They want to demoralize Israel to the point its people will no longer resist, and they could be slaughtered much easier.
53
Axerin11 hr ago
-9
Next level delulu comment lmfao.
-9
Axerin15 hr ago
-15
Hezbollah is a recognised terrorist organisation that is sanctioned by multiple countries. You want a UN recognised member state to be seen the same way then go right ahead.
-15
Goosepond0115 hr ago
-45
Defence is totally valid but many of the actions Israel has taken go far beyond defence and their actions have not been very positive when it comes to trying to make their local area more stable.
I don't understand how people think that a democratic, wealthy, western backed (although that is slipping) country with a powerful millitary shouldn't be held to a higher standard than terrorists.
like if we just continue the cycle of "well you were bad to me so I get to be bad to you" we end up with horrific outcomes.
-45
Ok_Midnight_585614 hr ago
+36
But what are they supposed to do then? Just take it? It’s war. I don’t agree with how Israel conducts themselves but it’s not all black and white
36
Goosepond0114 hr ago
-37
Millitary action, cooperation with innocent people, aid programmes, outreach to communities, anything that isn't just war.
-37
Mission_Scale_8608 hr ago
+6
I hold Hezbollah to the same high standard as Israel and all other countries. They don’t get to get away with their actions just because they are terrorists.
6
Youre-doin-great14 hr ago
-40
Collateral damage = bombing kids at school
-40
Goosepond0115 hr ago
-41
Hezbollah are 100% bad and absolutely deserve to all be put on trial for crimes against humanity... but so does the israeli leadership
Terrorism is difficult to fight as it uses a largely innocent population to hide and it uses dirty tactics, but this doesn't make it ok for Israel to do what it has done, you can't stoop to the same level as terrorists to try and defeat them.
It's been pretty clear that Israel doesn't want a more stable middle east, it wants a more stable middle east owned or controlled by Israel and continuing conditions where they have an amount of legitimacy to bomb and invade other countries is the way they think they can do this best but more and more people are seeing the truth now.
Israel being a rich, western backed (although thankfully it is losing some of that status) country with other gulf states who are somewhat friendly really could have worked together to try and end poverty, and to try and give people less and less of a reason to become terrorists, but they didn't and their actions are not acceptable.
-41
AffectionatePaint8312 hr ago
+24
'could have worked together to try and end poverty, and to try and give people less and less of a reason to become terrorists'
They did. They let Gazans into Israel proper to work, and make stable income, to show that working with Jewish people is in fact not a bad thing. Instead, they used it to scout places to attack during 10/7. Now you want them to do that for the Hez, who also have death to Jews coded into their founding philosophy. Nah, they can have bombs instead.
24
Goosepond0112 hr ago
-8
>Now you want them to do that for the Hez, who also have death to Jews coded into their founding philosophy. Nah, they can have bombs instead.
You think people are just like born terrorists?
plenty of Gazans are just normal peaceful people, you can't punish them all for a terrorist minority, as for Israel being nice to palestinians that is largely nonsense with all the forced seizures of land, property, bombing and other bad stuff.
really not hard to spend like 5 mins looking at Israeli warcrimes on wikipedia, it's more than just bombing and killing, it's systematic starvation.
as for letting Gazans in to Israel that isn't enough, they were constantly blocking aid to Palestinians, blocking economic development whilst also stealing property and land.
-8
Mission_Scale_8608 hr ago
+3
No I think people choose to become terrorists
3
infraGem15 hr ago
+52
Don't store weapons in civilian areas
52
DunkingTea15 hr ago
-47
The civilians don’t get a say though - that’s the whole point?
It’s like if US cities got bombed and you said “well Trump shouldn’t have attacked Iran”. Technically he shouldn’t have, as it is what caused it. But it’s not the civilians fault. Just as the Iranian civilians aren’t to blame.
It’s just a few mad men, with mad ideas, which are causing wars which are maddening.
Edit: amazing how listnook supports literal war crimes as they’re not Americans getting killed.
-47
SkinnyFatSoldier15 hr ago
+27
It’s their government though, not just a few people. Unfortunately, we all suffer the consequences of our government’s actions
27
TheMCMC10 hr ago
+13
Is Trump stockpiling rockets in your basement? If he was then blowing up your house is a military action. If they blow up your house just for fun it’s not.
13
infraGem5 hr ago
+1
>The civilians don't get a say though - that's the whole point?
Collateral damage and casualties are very sad and unfortunate. It is horrible that the terrorists using them don't care about that.
1
FlibbleA5 hr ago
-5
[When Israel continues daily bombing after agreeing to a ceasefire and self admitting to at least 500 strikes. ](https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/10/un-experts-warn-against-continued-violations-ceasefire-lebanon-and-urge)What are you meant to do?
-5
TitaniumMailbox4 hr ago
+1
MFers really don't read the ceasefire agreement and then confidently talk about ongoing Israeli strikes in Lebanon SMH.
1
FlibbleA4 hr ago
+1
I am not talking about ongoing. I am talking about the 2024 ceasefire that resulted in Israel never ceasing fire, it was firing day 1 of the agreement, never left Lebanon and prevented civilians from returning to their homes, all violations.
1
AlexandbroTheGreat14 hr ago
+85
Everyone knows this. Everyone knows everyone knows this. The only reason anybody plays pretend is because a few Western leftists would rather LARP as naive than anti-semetic.
85
Kenichi223315 hr ago
+62
And then they target Isreali civilliaj to piss off Israel so Lebonese civilian can get caught in the cross fire. Then they use the carnage to recruit more gullible teenager to die for there "jihad".
F*** Hezbollah and those who support them
Also Netanyahu need to stop picking fights with his neighbors
62
xmuskorx14 hr ago
+33
israel has not been in Lebanon since 1980s? what excuse do they have to keep attacking???
33
Kenichi223314 hr ago
+30
This started in the 1980s when the PLO based in Lebanon launched rockets at Israel. Then Irsael invaded thus sowing the seeds for the foundation of Hezbollah.
Since then they have been trading blows and Iran keeps Hezbollah funded with missiles.
30
xmuskorx14 hr ago
+54
it's been 45 years since Israel not been there.
there is no excuse for Hezbollah activity.
54
Kenichi223314 hr ago
+24
Jihad apparently
24
No-Space93714 hr ago
+16
\*2000 was the withdrawl from Southern Lebanon. Still a long ass time, and I find it equally disengenous how Hezbollah were certainly doing nothing about the Syrian occupation that was occuring throughout that same time period plus an addition 6 years more.
16
Smothdude9 hr ago
+1
And people just don't know about 2006 war or...?
1
Best_Change415515 hr ago
+22
>Also Netanyahu need to stop picking fights with his neighbors
?
22
ATertiaryEffect13 hr ago
+11
But you get told you're heartless if you say they should have been bombed
11
macross198413 hr ago
+28
Hazbollah going low tech (walkie talkie), no tech (paper) and division compartmentalized to prevent information leak make it harder to infiltrate but at the same time made their job fighting Israel less efficient.
And they are very wary of attack from sky when the commander abruptly ended interview and over the phone the reporter heard the buzzing sound of drone or jet.
28
Upset_Albatross_917913 hr ago
+7
You have to wonder if the active signal was helping whatever drone find him.
7
Designer_Professor_415 hr ago
+293
It was nice of him to confirm that Hezbollah had no intentions of disarming.
293
F4ntasticPants15 hr ago
+174
And that they have been violating the most major point of the ceasefire agreement since day 1.
174
BoppityBop212 hr ago
-128
Why would they, you disarm and you then have no ability to resist. Look at the West Bank. The disarmament by the PLO has literally allowed the Settlers to expand without much resistance.
-128
Designer_Professor_411 hr ago
+102
That would be the Lebanese armies job. Hezbollah had basically been a self destructive group, that gets other Lebanese killed along with them.
They claim they're there to resist, but after the PLO was crushed and Israel finally left, Israel hasn't even looked towards lebanon. Instead twice now Hezbollah has decided to attack them based on other wars (gaza, iran). Israel invaded and blows them up and Hezbollah cries look! this is why we exist to defend lebanon from Israel trying to take lebanon.
We'll no shit they're getting attacked they launched thousands of missiles at Israel wtf did you expect them to do, ignore it?
102
F4ntasticPants11 hr ago
+75
> Why would they
Because it was one of the main points in the ceasefire agreement *they agreed to* ?
75
Cobrastrikenana10 hr ago
-88
Anything else in that comment you wanna address or are we just gonna ignore land getting stolen daily?
-88
F4ntasticPants10 hr ago
+55
.. Which is literally *because* Hezbollah refused to disarm. The *entire reason* Israel is pushing deeper is because Hezbollah isn't doing what they agreed to do.
Had they disarmed and moved past the Litani, Israel would have no reason (nor excuse) to move in.
55
[deleted]10 hr ago
-68
[removed]
-68
F4ntasticPants10 hr ago
+57
The West Bank is not relevant to this discussion. We're talking about Hezbollah faking disarming in their ceasefire agreement in Lebanon, "dumbass"
57
BoppityBop28 hr ago
-29
It is relevant when the PLO negotiated with Israel to disarm, then disarmed and then saw more incursion on their lands and more abuse of their rights.
-29
Mission_Scale_8608 hr ago
+19
It’s not relevant to the discussion on why Israel is invading Lebanon
19
Kaarothh6 hr ago
-5
Then give us your home and leave
-5
PrestondeTipp15 hr ago
+168
Wait a second...NPR is interviewing, and providing a softball fluff piece, for an actual Hezbollah terrorist?
What the f*** is going on in America. Open air insane asylum.
> "Let's just say my expertise is those things that fly," he laughs. He means rockets, which Hezbollah has been firing into northern Israel by the thousands.
Jesus Christ.
168
theefle12 hr ago
+42
Haven't you heard? Britain even politely asked Israel to stop fighting Hezbollah, a group that Britain itself designates as a terror org. Why? Because big daddy terror sponsor, sometimes known as iran, is mad about it.
All of the rules and designations are made up, nobody actually behaves like its wrong to rain rocketry at civilian centers. What matters is getting the clicks, the oil, the $$$
42
StrangeMan1815 hr ago
+31
Many Isis members have too been interviewed, its part of normal journalism to want to hear both sides, even if you think one is objectively evil
31
silverpixie243512 hr ago
+38
Normal journalism is to actually interrogate people especially terrorists. Not just give them a platform to laugh
Why not a single question posed to this terrorist on the overwhelmingly majority of Lebanese society that wants Hezbollah disarmed?
38
HigherandHigherDown9 hr ago
+2
I assume they want to ask what they can without getting kidnapped and tortured like that other journalist.
2
Westbrooks3ptShot15 hr ago
-103
In this instance hezbollah is only thing stopping Isreal from invading and occupying Lebanon. Not surprising that people are viewing them as the morally righteous party here.
-103
fury42014 hr ago
+38
Israel literally withdrew from Lebanon back in 2006 in exchange for an agreement that Hezbollah would be disarmed... which never happened.
38
Westbrooks3ptShot14 hr ago
-48
Withdrew… so they should be congratulated for stoping their own invasions. That’s where you’re at?
Isreal also signed a ceasefire with Gaza and has yet to stop firing. Hard to see them as the justified ones.
-48
fury42014 hr ago
+34
>Withdrew… so they should be congratulated for stoping their own invasions. That’s where you’re at?
Hezbollah was the one that started the 2006 conflict by attacking Israel and taking Israeli soldiers hostage.
Israel then invaded to recover their soldiers and deal with Hezbollah, and withdrew from Lebanon in exchange for an agreement that Hezbollah would be disarmed.
The barrage of Hezbollah rocket fire starting Oct 8th proved very clearly that Hezbollah was not disarmed in southern Lebanon.
>Isreal also signed a ceasefire with Gaza and has yet to stop firing.
Why should they when Hamas is not complying with the terms either?
34
cammcken14 hr ago
+21
>congratulated for stoping their own invasions
Hezbollah started [that specific war](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Lebanon_War). Although in the wider picture it's part of the long ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
21
MVP_Legend_8715 hr ago
+82
This is false. Hezbollah is the reason there's even a conflict with Israel now. Even the PM of Lebanon admitted this and called out Hezbollah for starting the conflict over once more.
Israel wouldn't be anywhere near Lebanon if Hezbollah wasn't attacking Israel.
82
psychoCMYK15 hr ago
-65
Hezbollah wasn't attacking Israel during the ceasefire between the US and Iran, Israel insisted it wasn't covered in the ceasefire and attacked Lebanon. That's why the ceasefire fell apart.
-65
booty_explorer_25115 hr ago
+44
Hezbollah doesn't get to decide when a ceasefire starts. Especially after they violated a ceasefire with Israel twice.
between 2006-2023 there was a ceasefire which in 8/10/2023 they decided to violate to support Hamas (mind you Israel wasn't invading Gaza yet back than)
44
ThomYorkeSoup14 hr ago
-40
There could have finally been peace but because of Netanyahu violating the most recent ceasefire we'll never know
-40
ComprehensiveLaw101214 hr ago
+24
The only people saying Lebanon was included in the ceasefire is Iran and Pakistan (they of the defense minister who just called for Israel's annihilation). Choose who you want to believe, but there is absolutely zero concrete information saying that Lebanon was included in the ceasefire.
24
psychoCMYK13 hr ago
-29
You are trying to justify Israel bombing Lebanon while there was actually peace for once.
-29
ComprehensiveLaw101213 hr ago
+18
I'm sorry that the unclear circumstances of the parameters of the ceasefire go against your preferred narrative. Unfortunately for you, your imagination does not impact reality.
18
psychoCMYK13 hr ago
-33
Israel is not defending itself. It's attacking Lebanon. Rockets don't care about your narratives, and they were only going one way that day.
-33
xmuskorx15 hr ago
+154
I don't want to open this and give it clicks.
is this npr doing a fluff piece on an actual terrorist?
154
AK_Panda12 hr ago
+78
Looks like Hezbollah scoring an own goal tbh.
"Yeah bro of course we had a bunch of munitions hidden away in civilian areas, no we didn't comply with dearming them"
78
GlassBit708112 hr ago
+6
I suspect they are more broken than they realise. The veterans are gone. Structure and hierarchy is shaky and Israel is relentlessly targeting the capable remainders.
6
Best-Research40226 hr ago
+2
That’s why Israel has destroyed the southern villages they all have tunnels underneath, with no residents hezbollah can’t blend in anymore
2
PrestondeTipp15 hr ago
+90
Yes, precisely
90
xmuskorx15 hr ago
+52
let me guess, not a single tough question was asked?
it's amazing how journalism as a profession has fallen so low ..
52
Icy-Ask394315 hr ago
+64
"Every terrorist is terrorist for a reason. Let's show their human side. Tell us your favorite color?"
- NPR and BBC
64
xmuskorx15 hr ago
+63
April 1945...
Journalist: "dear Adolph, thanks for calling in. we heard you are in a bunker. must be tough on your family. can you tell us how you are dealing with all Berlin bombings?"
63
potential-okay15 hr ago
+15
Ok this one got me good 😂
15
glumjonsnow10 hr ago
+14
they're amateurs compared to the guardian tbh:
[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/11/from-isis-recruit-to-influencer-tareena-shakil](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/11/from-isis-recruit-to-influencer-tareena-shakil)
the guardian has a gold medal in terror puff piece
14
Additional_Week_398015 hr ago
+20
sadly yes.
20
glumjonsnow10 hr ago
+11
yea they really tried here, it's super embarrassing esp after they just got raked over the coals for their sympathetic coverage of hezbollah. so bad their public editor had to respond and defend them. at this point it has to be on purpose - it's been pointed out so often
11
FinndBors14 hr ago
+7
I don’t know what you consider a fluff piece but I am absolutely interested to hear an interview with a hezbollah commander even if I absolutely disagree with them. What do you think journalism is for?
7
xmuskorx14 hr ago
+34
did they ask him any tough questions?
"what is your end goal?"
"do you intend to destroy Israel?"
"are you financed by Iran?"
that's what journalism is for.
not asking A SINGLE TOUGH QUESTION is journalistic malpractice. it's not an interview, it's a soft ball fluff piece.
34
silverpixie243512 hr ago
+15
Ask him the most basic questions? Like its not even a secret that Lebanon itself hates Hezbollah and wants them disarmed. Basic polling confirms that. So why not ask a single question about it?
15
yosisoy11 hr ago
+13
It's a PR piece, not journalism
13
Persimmon910 hr ago
+28
Does NPR understands that this is pro Israel? How did they let that happen? That editor will be reprimanded for certain. So hezb didn't disarm and the big attack was actually against them and not aimed at civilians.
28
UseBackground237012 hr ago
+23
and why is the world interviewing terrorists now?
23
Scagnettio8 hr ago
+9
That's what journalist do.
9
omniuni13 hr ago
+32
How gracious NPR has become to interview and sugarcoat a terrorist.
Even starting off with a quote about occupation without noting that this happened after almost a year of them bombing Northern Israel from that location and tens of thousands of Israelis being evacuated for months.
It's not that you're being occupied, Mr. Terrorist, it's that you've picked a fight with a gorilla and you're losing. You could literally have just *not started this in the first place and lived in peace*. (Note: Referring to the current conflict. I'm not going to get into historical who started what.)
32
Behemothheek8 hr ago
+2
Even as someone very critical of Hezbollah this was a fascinating read
2
K0TEM6 hr ago
+4
So journalists are now either interview terrorists (like in Lebanon) or join them (like in Gaza). What the hell is happening?
4
giboauja15 hr ago
-55
I hate when Israel gets to be technically correct about a grievance, while acting are on more extreme agenda.
-55
The_Bitter_Bear9 hr ago
+21
"I hate that the facts don't align with my feelings and TikTok feed".
21
xmuskorx9 hr ago
+24
Did you consider that the grievance is 100% legitimate and not "technical" at all?
maybe Israel is acting in basic self-defense after DECADES of being bombed by Iranian proxies?
Same same old, it was always considered an "extreme agenda" for jews to simply survive...
24
PhantasmologicalAnus11 hr ago
+32
I like how they just keep smashing known terrorists, no matter what others say. It's great.
109 Comments