· 194 comments · Save ·
Announcements Apr 28, 2012 at 10:47 PM

A quick note on CISPA and related bills

Posted by reddit


It’s the weekend and and many of us admins are away, but we wanted to come together and say something about [CISPA](http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr3523eh/pdf/BILLS-112hr3523eh.pdf) (and the equivalent cyber security bills in the Senate — [S. 2105](http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s2105pcs/pdf/BILLS-112s2105pcs.pdf) and [S. 2151](http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s2151is/pdf/BILLS-112s2151is.pdf)). We will be sharing more about these issues in the coming days as well as trying to recruit experts for IAMAs and other discussions on listnook. There’s been much discussion, anger, confusion, and conflicting information about CISPA as well as listnook's position on it. Thank you for rising to the front lines, getting the word out, gathering information, and holding our legislators and finally us accountable. That’s the listnook that we’re proud to be a part of, and it’s our responsibility as citizens and a community to identify, rally against, and take action against legislation that impacts our internet freedoms. We’ve got your back, and we do care deeply about these issues, but \*your\* voice is the one that matters here. To effectively approach CISPA, the Senate cyber security bills, and anything else that may threaten the internet, we must focus on how the listnook community as a whole can make the most positive impact communicating and advocating against such bills, and how we can help. Our goal is to figure out how all of us can help protect a free, private, and open internet, now, and in the future. As with the SOPA debate, we have a huge opportunity to make an impact here. Let’s make the most of it.

🚩 Report this post

194 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
SwampySoccerField Apr 28, 2012 +605
Well here we are again. We knew it was coming but most of did not suspect it would come so soon. It hasn't even been five months since the worldwide PIPA & SOPA protests and Congress is back to playing its standard game of slashing and burning what we hold most important for the sake of their personal agendas. The bills of PIPA & SOPA are effectively dead, but their text is being broken up into pieces and has been put into other bills and what they represent lives on. I do not want to alarm you, the person reading thing, but you should starring long and hard at what is going on right now. We are on the precipice of something horrible happening and if we do not fight again, we will lose horribly and our personal freedoms will be maimed and impacted far beyond what we can see as the initial impact: As of today this is where we stand: 1. SOPA (The Stop Online Piracy Act) is effectively dead 2. PIPA (The PROTECT IP Act) is effectively dead 3. [CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act)](http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3523:) has passed the House of Representatives with [248 yes, 168 no, and 15 abstained votes.](http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/house-representatives-passes-privacy-busting-cispa) 4. [Cybersecurity Act 2012](http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.2105:) 5. [SECURE IT Act](http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.2151:). 6. [PRECISE Act](http://homeland.house.gov/bill/hr-3674-promoting-and-enhancing-cybersecurity-and-information-sharing-effectiveness-act-2011) Currently there are four bills in Congress that stand to wipe away the privacy, the anonymity, and the freedom we take advantage of every day. If any one of these bills makes it through Congress the internet as we know it is effectively over. This is a zero sum situation and we have to act again. **Let us begin with CISPA:** - [Accusations & source information against CISPA. That thread is full of information](http://www.listnook.com/r/politics/comments/spxx4/this_is_cispa_explained_sopa_was_meant_to_stop/c4g3bv3) - [Even with Rogers’ Amendments, CISPA is Still a Surveillance Bill](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/04/even-rogers-amendments-cispa-still-surveillance-bill) - [By including the word "notwithstanding," CISPA's drafters intended to make their legislation trump all existing federal and state civil and criminal laws. It would render irrelevant wiretap laws, Web companies' privacy policies, educational record laws, medical privacy laws, and more.](http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57419540-281/opposition-grows-to-cispa-big-brother-cybersecurity-bill/) - [Cyber Intelligence Bill Threatens Privacy and Civilian Control](https://www.cdt.org/blogs/greg-nojeim/112cyber-intelligence-bill-threatens-privacy-and-civilian-control) - [How The Expansive Immunity Clauses in CISPA Will Facilitate Abuse of User Privacy](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/04/how-expansive-immunity-clauses-cispa-will-facilitate-abuse-user-privacy-0) - [What is CISPA and how it affects you FAQ](http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57422693-281/how-cispa-would-affect-you-faq/) - [Four things to know about CISPA](http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/04/four-things-to-know-about-cispa) - [Congress Braces for Battle over Cybersecurity Bill (Mention of Freedom of Information Act Implications)](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/23/congress-braces-for-battle-over-cybersecurity-bill.html) - [Companies and Agencies already share essential information. Why is CISPA needed?](https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120426/16471718672/law-enforcement-already-has-way-to-share-cybersecurity-info-with-companies-why-do-we-need-cispa.shtml) - [The Political Effects of Conflating Separate Meanings of "Cybersecurity"](https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/political-effects-conflating-separate-meanings) - [Administration pushes against bipartisan House cybersecurity legislation](http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/222143-white-house-criticizes-cybersecurity-bill-cispa) **Next up is the Cybersecurity Act of 2012:** - [Cybersecurity Act May Challenge Public's Right to Know](http://www.c-span.org/Events/Cybersecurity-Act-May-Challenge-Publics-Right-to-Know/10737429000/) - [The Cybersecurity Act of 2012 is a fix for a problem that was never a problem.](http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2401225,00.asp) - [Does The Cybersecurity Act Of 2012 Mark The Beginning Of The War On Cyber-terrorism?](http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2012/02/22/does-the-cybersecurity-act-of-2012-mark-the-beginning-of-the-war-on-cyber-terrorism/) **Now we move onto the SECURE IT Act:** [Civil libertarians slam McCain cybersecurity bill](http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/06/us-usa-cybersecurity-idUSTRE8251L820120306) - [McCain cybersecurity bill aims for legal frameworks, updates, not structural changes](http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/mccain-cybersecurity-bill-aims-legal-frameworks-updates-not-structural-chan/2012-03-05) - [White House pans GOP cybersecurity bill](http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/213877-white-house-pans-gop-cybersecurity-bill) - [McCain, GOP Leaders Intro Cybersecurity Bill Alternative](http://www.csoonline.com/article/701303/mccain-gop-leaders-intro-cybersecurity-bill-alternative) - [Senators Clash Over Cybersecurity Legislation](http://www.govtech.com/security/Senators-Clash-Over-Cybersecurity-Legislation.html) - [Senate cybersecurity bill leaves Internet alone, exempts tech companies from oversight](http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/senate-cybersecurity-bill.ars) **Last but not least we have the PRECISE ACT:** **A Comparison Analysis of the Four Current Bills:** - [An image comparing SOPA & CISPA](http://i.imgur.com/ga3Pb.jpg) - [CDT: Cybersecurity Bill Comparison Chart](https://www.cdt.org/paper/cybersecurity-chart) - [CDT: Analysis of Senate Cybersecurity Bills 2012.](https://www.cdt.org/report/analysis-senate-cybersecurity-bills-2012) - [EFF: Four Unanswered Questions About the Cybersecurity Bills](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/03/four-unanswered-questions-about-cybersecurity-bills) - [Comparing the Senate Cybersecurity Liability Provisions](http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/03/comparing-the-senate-cybersecurity-liability-provisions/) As it stands now, days after the House of Representatives passed CISPA, we are poised with the questions of: Who, what, where, and why? While many of the answers to those questions can be found in the links posted above the biggest reason as to why major companies like Google, Facebook, and even listnook have not spoken out vehemently against these bills is simple. They actually stand to benefit from them in some ways. CISPA was crafted from the ground up, with the help of some of these very major tech companies and the NSA, so the debacle of SOPA & PIPA wouldn't happen again. Instead of having to fight against companies and their users they now just have to worry about your average joe getting upset. Doing this paints a much smaller target on the bill and makes it that much more challenging for us to prevent the abuses that are poised to come from CISPA and the additional 'cybersecurity' bills. Many are calling for blackouts again but unfortunately Congress is trying a new and incredibly effective strategy this time. They are dividing us from the companies that assisted us last time. In the language of CISPA it has been found, cut and dry, that most companies will be given immunity from what goes on within their enterprises so long as they hand over your information en mass. This means that your user profile, your personal information, your comment history, the websites you link to, and even possibly what you like of Facebook and similar websites will be handed over to the government. To make matters even worse, the government will essentially bribe these companies by paying them to hand over the data. Congress did something cunningly smart, they made it so the only allies the common user has are themselves. Listnook INC as a company has no good reason to speak up loudly in support like they did with PIPA & SOPA. The reason is that they actually come to benefit from CISPA. /r/ExplainItLikeImFive puts it nicely: >[Basically it allows companies to provide the federal government with data concerning "cybersecurity threats" without liability. Currently most large websites have a Privacy Policy which normally states that companies will not voluntarily share your data. If they did share your data, then you could likely successfully sue them. CISPA protects companies from lawsuits if they share data concerning "cybersecurity threats" with the federal government. So companies like Facebook and Google tend to like the bill because it shields them from liability.](http://www.listnook.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/sujsu/what_is_cispa/) We must not, we cannot, allow these companies to ever believe that that selling out the user and throwing them under the bus can be part of their business model. It must be a concrete, inseparable, fact that our interests are the companies interest. You and I stood up and fought in the ways that we could to protect these companies like Google, Facebook, even Listnook INC from PIPA & SOPA. They need to do their damnedest to do the same for us. The ridiculously overused saying by pastor Martin Niemöller best fits here: >First they came for the communists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist. >Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist. >Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew. >Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me. [**There is a part two to this. There won't be anymore 'inspiring quotes' either!**](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/sxdxv/a_quick_note_on_cispa_and_related_bills/c4hs5v3)
605
SwampySoccerField Apr 28, 2012 +258
Part 2: *Some of you will consider this next paragraph a bit harsh. Keep in mind that these companies aren't too interested in seriously speaking up because they actually stand to benefit from these bills. The companies listed had no problem aligning themselves and speaking out with us when it was explicitly for their own benefit but when it has come time to protect our interests they are essentially nowhere to be found. They don't consider our situation to be 'their fight' even when it really should be. They figure that we're their users regardless and don't care. If there is consequence for them then they will be more inclined to say something.* Facebook, listnook, Google, you need to get back in the ring. We stood with you and I don't mean to sound pushy but its your moral obligation to stand with us. If you are not willing to fight on our behalf then we will be left with only two options. We can either sit here and let you sell us out because its convenient or we can demonize you for the actions you choose to support and revile you until we are capable of creating something that will leave you obsolete. You may believe that you are too big and too influential for some random person talking on the internet to do much harm to your enterprises, but make no mistake that if you do not make it your imperative to fight for us in the open and behind the scenes then we will be left with the only option of creating, through necessity, something that takes you out of the equation. Out of all of these bills I have yet to see the focus of attention be on the biggest problems we face. Those problems boil down to government employees, contractors, and users with access to sensitive networks misbehaving and not doing what they should. No government employee should be downloading torrents, watching p***, blogging, or any of the sort on government computers. This leaves them vulnerable. Outdated software, and insecure networks, when coupled with connecting infected cell phones or USB sticks to these systems compromises them to such a level that nearly every company or aspect of government has been compromised on some level. Here are just few articles out of hundreds that highlight the plague of incompetence that could so easily be stopped by proper training and setting essential standards within government agencies, private contractors, and the US military. Almost all of these things do not require new laws but instead require internal changes that effect management and policy within these entities. - [Zero Day exploits](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/03/zero-day-exploit-sales-should-be-key-point-cybersecurity-debate) - [Forever Day vulnerabilities](http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/04/rise-of-ics-forever-day-vulnerabiliities-threaten-critical-infrastructure.ars) - [General incompetence levels in government contractors.](http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124027491029837401.html) - [DoD Networks Completely Compromised, Experts Say . CISPA / Cybersecurity Act 2012 / SECURE IT Act are not solutions to real cybersecurity problems. (March 22, 2012)](http://blogs.cio.com/security/16923/dod-networks-completely-compromised-experts-say) - [Security for the 99%? What are bugs, vulnerabilities, exploits and “zero-day” exploits?](https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/04/security-99) - [Backdoor In Equipment Used For Traffic Control, Railways Called "Huge Risk"](https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/backdoor-equipment-used-traffic-control-railways-called-huge-risk-042512) **Changes in Current Cybersecurity Law are Needed:** The fact of the matter is that current cybersecurity laws are lacking. While a vast majority of problems could be prevented by reasonable, common sense, approaches and policies within agencies, it still stands that the current law is lacking in certain regards. However, the blanket approaches that are used in all of these bills and that are all too common cannot be used as they are so far reaching and apply to nearly every aspect of the internet. SOPA & PIPA drew so much ire due to the easily broad interpretations that could be made under their legislation. Similarly, CISPA and the additional bills, follow this line of thinking. Rather than just throwing everything under the sun under a single umbrella Congress needs to be much more choosy about where they allow for broad interpretations within their legislation. Loopholes and blanket approaches cannot stand and we need to make it clear that such behavior will not be tolerated. Using "protecting children" as part of the actual language of the bill to include topics covered by CISPA is outrageous. **I hope many of you are asking how you can help:** If you want spend a few minutes you can retweet, discuss and link to articles on facebook, talk to your friends and family, upvote these kinds of topics on listnook. Subscribe to /r/evolutionlistnook, /r/fia, or any of the various sublistnooks that these sublistnooks link to. If you want to be informed, then doing the little things will make all the difference. The little things add up and your effort could be the piece of straw that breaks the camel's back. If you are a doodler you can create a work that symbolizes what is wrong with these bills and please release it under one of the appropriate licenses. If you are a video editor, or even have a webcam, you can make a work and upload it to youtube or any of the various other video websites so others can watch and become better informed. If you you are a writer or a journalist, and it doesn't matter what your level of expertise is, you can help explain to others why these bills are to atrocious. If you are on a school paper you can write an article and bring the fight to your campus. If you have an email, if you have a phone, if you have five minutes to kill, you can call or write someone and give them a piece of your mind. All that matters is that you try to do your part. Give up an afternoon and print out fliers to pass out around town, to stick under windshields, to staple to a local bulletin board. If we do not advocate for ourselves them nobody else will. **Contact your representatives in Congress directly. Please be respectful:** - [Call your congressional representatives with **a single click** and urge them to vote against CISPA.](http://grassroutes.us/cispa) - [How to contact your senatorial goat-people concerning CISPA](http://listnook.com/r/evolutionListnook/comments/sumss/how_to_contact_your_senatorial_goatpeople/) - [Concise how-to on contacting your representative](http://www.listnook.com/r/SOPA/comments/nl1qr/please_listen_to_b/c3a1rlr) **Contact Directories for the House, Senate and US Embassies** - [Online Directory for the 112th Congress](http://www.contactingthecongress.org/) - [Directory of Representatives](http://www.house.gov/representatives/) - [Senators of the 112th Congress](https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm) - [triangleman83: I collected all of the senators who have Twitter accounts and compiled a list sorted by state.](http://pastebin.com/WfdGJsZq) - [International Listnookors: Contact your local US embassy or consulate](http://www.usembassy.gov/) - [CISPA Congressional Money Trail](http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h3523/money) **Contact those companies directly:** [Here is a list of contact information for the companies who are publicly supporting CISPA](http://www.listnook.com/r/politics/comments/sjcz6/the_fight_against_cispa_links_to_contributing/) **Spend your money elsewhere:** [Here are companies that have sent in letters of support for CISPA. As you are probably aware, many companies that spoke up in support of SOPA & PIPA have likely learned their lesson and aren't going to be so public this time](http://intelligence.house.gov/hr-3523-letters-support) listnook INC we need your help. During PIPA & SOPA you blacked out your website. I fully understand that it must have cost you quite a pretty penny and there is a chance that your corporate owners may not allow you to do the same again. However, sitting here and just speaking a blurb does not cut it. You have the resources to reach out to the community and explain to the uninformed just how sweeping and damaging CISPA will be on your users. You have the means at your disposal to dissect CISPA and make it accessible to every John, Mary, and Sue. You are capable of motivating hundreds of thousands of people to speak up and create a ripple so large that the rest of the internet will be forced to take notice. We are not asking you shut down every time some there is a jarring bill that wishes to take away what we hold dear, we are asking you to stand with us on the front lines and to keep standing there with us so we do not have to fight alone. Give us a blog post that rivals ['A Technicaly Examination of SOPA & PROTECT IP](http://blog.listnook.com/2012/01/technical-examination-of-sopa-and.html). Do what you can because we cannot do this alone. I want to thank /u/EquanimousMind, moderator of /r/evolutionlistnook for compiling a good portion of these links. He has been posting up a storm and doing his best to do his part.
258
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +9
I wish to draft you for [r/privacy](https://pay.listnook.com/r/privacy)
9
Anon_is_a_Meme Apr 29, 2012 +11
>Facebook, listnook, Google, you need to get back in the ring. We stood with you and I don't mean to sound pushy but its your moral obligation to stand with us. If you are not willing to fight on our behalf then we will be left with only two options. We can either sit here and let you sell us out because its convenient or we can demonize you for the actions you choose to support and revile you until we are capable of creating something that will leave you obsolete. You're going to demonize the companies that *opposed* PIPA/SOPA (Listnook & Google) because they haven't yet opposed CISPA? Wouldn't it make more sense to demonize the companies that *support* PIPA/SOPA/CISPA??
11
SwampySoccerField Apr 29, 2012 +20
PIPA & SOPA have a jarring difference when compared to CISPA. CISPA more or less gives them legal immunity and excludes them from much of the legislation in the bill. The two previous bills left them liable. This is why they had such a bone to pick, and were so willing to jump into the ring then. Those bills dramatically affected them. I will edit and further elaborate on this point to explain it better. [This image briefly expresses the idea](http://i.imgur.com/ga3Pb.jpg)
20
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +3
Would be funny if facebook were to pretend to want to protect your privacy, several people might bust a rib laughing, the elderly might die chocking with laughter.
3
Graveworn Apr 28, 2012 +1051
Black outs will not continue to work guys. They continually lose their effectiveness every time you do them. There are 4-5 f****** bills being considered right now for internet censorship, do you really think that Google and Wikipedia are going to shut down their shit that many times, and who knows how many in the future? Or are we naive enough to think that just blacking out Listnook will make a difference? We need these people out of office, and need to spread awareness that this is not ok. There are initiatives all across the board for doing so, and supporting them and getting involved is our best shot. EDIT: some awesome information on CISPA and the upcoming bills and what you can do to help (in addition to Alexander_X_Blakes information) **HERE IT IS**--------> [Info](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/sxdxv/a_quick_note_on_cispa_and_related_bills/c4hs04e)
1051
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +535
[deleted]
535
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +209
[deleted]
209
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +76
[deleted]
76
eirannach Apr 29, 2012 +22
Don't use scripts, they tune them out. Calls or messages they haven't heard a 1000 times have 1000 times more of the impact than the same rote regurgitation over and over.
22
whirlingderv Apr 29, 2012 +3
My understanding is that congressional offices blindly count "yes" and "no" or "for" and "against" votes with calls like these. When you call you are talking to an intern or a random low-level staffer, there is no point in trying hard to convince these people, because the congress member doesn't care about their staffers' personal beliefs, they barely pay attention to their constituents' opinions...
3
clintonius Apr 29, 2012 +3
Just don't call it "HR" anything when calling your senator, as that's the name used in the House, and it might be confusing to reference it when you talk with someone at the Senate.
3
aranasyn Apr 29, 2012 +42
Done. It takes two goddamn minutes, people. Make the f****** call.
42
Frankfusion Apr 29, 2012 +3
As a California guy, my two senators have been on since I was in 5th grade. I'm now a college graduate. They're in DEEP with the entertainment industry. It just feels like one letter ain't going to get the message across. Oh and I've never voted for them either. Not to be defeatist, but perhaps we can do (as we tried last time) to target newer Senators and let them know we will donate to campaign against them.
3
epic_comebacks Apr 28, 2012 +103
You can just link us you know.
103
wants_to_die Apr 28, 2012 +103
but then there's not 2x karma.
103
elephantx Apr 28, 2012 +19
Can you give us the house members too?
19
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +39
[deleted]
39
AtA7plus Apr 28, 2012 +4
It passed in the house already. But you can google for who said yea and nay and call and yell at them.
4
whoopdedo Apr 28, 2012 +11
The problem is they're being told that there is a serious cybersecurity threat and something must be done. Governments will continue to try passing laws such as this because they believe that if they don't, evil hackers will blow-up our nuclear powerplants with a computer virus. Telling a politician that SOPA is a bad idea may get them to not pass that bill, so they have it rewritten as CISPA. If you can convince them that CISPA is a bad idea, it'll only go away temporarily until the next travesty comes along that the pols are told is a matter of national security. Of course, the root of the problem is that the lawmakers are not even writing these bills. It's a farce of some special interest telling the government that such-and-such is a vital necessity, then those same people present a "solution" to the problem they manufactured in the first place. (Then they open the project to bids and, surprise surprise, guess who gets the contract because their bid met all the requirements at the exactly the budgeted cost?)
11
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +349
They just need to pass one of these bills to f*** us and we can't stop them all. We need to go on the offensive and pass an Electronic Bill of Rights.
349
RedThela Apr 28, 2012 +148
This is a farsighted plan and you are living up to your username. I like it.
148
notbullshittingyou Apr 28, 2012 +166
[/r/FreedomofInternetAct](http://www.listnook.com/r/FIA)
166
American_Assface Apr 29, 2012 +83
I see that you are not bullshitting me. I like it.
83
Herkeless Apr 28, 2012 +40
Obama has called for such a bill of rights before. That's a useful supporter for one of these.
40
SanDiegoMitch Apr 29, 2012 +22
Obama has called for a lot of things. It sounds good, he gets votes. He also said he was going to veto sopa and cispa
22
ryegye24 Apr 29, 2012 +44
SOPA didn't pass so he really didn't get a chance to veto it, and CISPA hasn't passed in the Senate yet so Obama doesn't yet have the ability to sign it into law or veto it. You're probably thinking of NDAA which Obama promised to veto and then backed down when some token changes were made.
44
AdoptASatoFromPR Apr 29, 2012 +2
> We need to go on the offensive and pass an Electronic Bill of Rights. Hear, hear! Slightly off-topic: I say this needs to happen generally. For years, (decades?) elements of American society have been keeping radical pieces of legislation ready to take advantage of catastrophes to get them passed. The patriot act is an example. Many of those same elements proactively work to get their legislation passed. See ALEC. These strategies work! Internet denizens and ordinary people should adopt them! Let's stop being reactive and back on our heels all the time!
2
gR3ypH0x Apr 28, 2012 +27
Agreed. You, my good man, make a very good point. Blacking out is only going to make Google/Listnook/Wikipedia look like a one trick pony. Those of us with the ability to take part in the initiatives need to take part. Those of us who can't need to find another alternative and follow suit. We can't just let them think they can impede our freedoms.
27
lud1120 Apr 28, 2012 +3
Google never blacked out. They did raise quite some awareness with their Google doodle and Anti-SOPA campaign. Had SOPA passed the Internet would have been really screwed and so would the Corporations/Companies opposing it. Listnook was down for 12 hours, while Wikipedia blacked out for 24 hours, the biggest effort of all of them. Yet we know how in extremely huge websites like Facebook where almost everyone are active there was a lot of rant even AGAINST Wikipedia and not being aware at all...
3
BSchoolBro Apr 28, 2012 +166
As someone not from America, I'm wondering; When will it finally stop?
166
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +22
[deleted]
22
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +60
CISPA has been in practice since 9/11 and even longer in other forms of communication. CISPA basically just legalizes what companies and the NSA will do anyway. When will it stop? Hard to say when it started in ~~the 80's~~ the 70's with intercepted telegrams.
60
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +34
This is what I've been thinking. We're all used to using the internet with caution. What I'm wondering is how this bill's rhetoric will impede upon internet users who are harmless even though the government doesn't think they are. If we can't talk seriously or joke seriously, what's left of places like listnook? We don't know where the line is going to be drawn, and this confusion is cause enough to get ready for something big.
34
gotnate Apr 28, 2012 +22
> Hard to say when it started in the 80's with intercepted telegrams. 1880s?
22
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +4
[1970's. My mistake.](http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57422693-281/how-cispa-would-affect-you-faq/)
4
symbiotiq Apr 28, 2012 +198
When the old officials are replaced by people that actually have the rights and interests of their citizens in mind.
198
YourCorporateMasters Apr 28, 2012 +563
Hahaha, we already bought their successors.
563
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +14
This is somewhat counter to the general cynicism here, but anyone here who wants this stopped will probably have to get involved. It's already passed the house, which means we'll have to [start calling our senators](http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm). Anyone who listened to that "This American Life" podcast a couple weeks ago will remember Barney Frank saying that pissed off constituents will always beat outside money hands down, so if I were a concerned listnookor I would start thinking about things in the bill to be mad about. Also, if you're even more motivated, a good way to send a message would be to [see if your representative](http://www.dailypaul.com/229236/roll-call-who-voted-for-cispa-courtesy-of-campaign-for-liberty) voted for CISPA, and if so just give their office a call and let them know that Representative so-and-so's clear hatred of free speech is just not something you'll be able to support with your vote. Ever again. Or permit your friends, family, church members, or coworkers to support.
14
StormTAG Apr 28, 2012 +39
Upvote for funny. Tears for "really not."
39
FermiAnyon Apr 28, 2012 +56
: ( Can I at least have a raise?
56
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +150
You're a b******.
150
smaq Apr 28, 2012 +85
So, never. Heard.
85
VGChampion Apr 28, 2012 +30
No. Until people start voting and learning about politics. This old saying about the "old officials" is just not true. There are plenty of people in their twenties and thirties who agree with this stuff.
30
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +24
[removed]
24
Ravanas Apr 29, 2012 +12
As a fellow cynic, I feel obliged to point out that if you let them, then you're right. So do it yourself. If you don't have the ability to be a candidate yourself, help find one you can believe in. Help grow a third party. Work for it, don't expect it to be handed to you by people who have proved they won't listen, much less help. And think long term. Maybe you get in to local politics and work your way up (either as a candidate or staff member). Most politicians on the national stage didn't start there. So start where you can, and do what you can to fight them. Yes, its a huge task. But if you want change, you have to start somewhere and protests and awareness raising only do so much. If you think its not enough to change anything (it often isn't) then DIY.
12
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +21
[deleted]
21
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +5
it wont. Our legislation thinks voters are the problem.
5
SupertomSeven Apr 28, 2012 +7
Very true, the political system should not turn into a game of "chicken." It's not who backs down first, it's who makes an impact most. They have the power to vote on the issues, we have the power to vote on their jobs. Lets use that.
7
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +73
A blackout wouldn't even make sense, CISPA isn't a censorship bill
73
lud1120 Apr 28, 2012 +17
It's all about us, the users. But what should Listnook really do? I don't think people in Congress give a damn about some (giant) Internet community. Other than encouraging more people to protest against it I don't know what else. Also considering only about 10% have made accounts and only 1% comment makes it seem much smaller than it is.
17
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +3
>But what should Listnook really do? I don't think people in Congress give a damn about some (giant) Internet community. At the expense of national security? Probably not.
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +3
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. If you would like to do the same, add the browser extension [TamperMonkey](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tampermonkey/dhdgffkkebhmkfjojejmpbldmpobfkfo) for Chrome (or [GreaseMonkey](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/) for Firefox) and add [this open source script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/10380-listnook-overwrite). Then simply click on your username on Listnook, go to the comments tab, and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
3
MrImToo Apr 28, 2012 +65
I DISAGREE - Regarding not Blacking out. Here is why... A. They keep coming with the same attacks, just written differently every time, we must do the same. The blackout brings a gigantic black open enrollment form for all of the internet who has no idea regarding CISPA or related bills (very effective). Although I will agree they lose their effectiveness over time, this method is still and has been in the past an amazing attribute that we have created within. B. We need to gather as a community outside of these wires and circuits. We need to hit the streets, Remember that retarded KONY 2012 Thing? DO you realize how effective that was?! We need to revamp the idea and start a creation of our own, vimeo videos, a day to repeal, meetings and hit the f****** streets. C. News, Who are listnooks allies? Websites, Talk Show Hosts? The Huff Post or Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert, NO matter what it is, we need to either have the admins contact them and work something out or we need to continue to multiply emails to these people and have them work with us, This costs us nothing but our time, the time we are choosing how to live it. Lets not stop. D. Can we form Donations? Billboards, commercials, whatever we have to do to gain exposure. E.[/r/fia](/r/fia) Free Internet Activism - Everyone should at the minimum glance this page. F. Admins/Someone Important/Potato_in_my_anus Please create an asklistnook topic to figure out where and how we should start first and make this hit the front page, If I were to create it I feel as if It would not get proper exposure, we are the most powerful internet group out their, let us know how we can agree to come together. Adding on to this list or critiques are encouraged. This is where we need to start moving and if you're waiting, you need to realize quickly, we have no time to wait or spare, the time to act is now. EDITS: 1. Grammar 2. DOSKO - Pointed out Listnook has a PAC. 3. Wormy and OLawD has pointed to [/r/FIA](/r/FIA) Which we need to all educate on. 4. KEEP ADDING!!! This list needs to be severely populated with our intelligent, witty, creative and effective ideas, let us display and implement them!
65
oobey Apr 29, 2012 +4
> Remember that retarded KONY 2012 thing? Do you realize how effective that was? Yes. It accomplished nothing.
4
qazaibomb Apr 29, 2012 +30
1. **CALL YOUR SENATORS** let them know that you will not vote for them again if they support this. if they get enough calls/emails, they won't vote for it. 2. **GET THE INFORMATION OUT THERE** get to the papers, talk to your friends, post shit on facebook, get #StopCISPA trending, whatever. the main reason the blackout was so effective was because all of the attention that google/wikipedia brought to it caused people to become aware of the issue. if the public knows, this shit will not go down. 3. **BOYCOTT COMPANIES THAT SUPPORT IT** http://www.digitaltrends.com/web/cispa-supporters-list-800-companies-that-could-help-uncle-sam-snag-your-data/ heres a list. this ones a lot harder, but if we all do it, we can change everything. im not saying you need to change your cable company or cell phone plan, but tackle things that can be attacked easily. for example, dont go on google or yahoo if you can avoid it. use another search engine like ask for a while. dont use your visa card. dont go to walmart or target. dont drink coke or pepsi. let these companies know we dont support their stances by hitting their wallets. like i said, it wont be easy, but it will work, guaranteed.
30
expected_crayon Apr 28, 2012 +58
What if we created a Listnook Super PAC with the sole purpose being to combat these "internet security" bills? There's a lot of us, I bet we can get some big donations and make some good TV campaigns. And since we can't all agree on just about any other political issue, we'll put it in the organization's founding documents that this is the only thing it can spend funds on. Thoughts?
58
spladug Apr 28, 2012 +39
http://testpacpleaseignore.org/ EDIT: to be clear, as /u/JRandomHacker172342 just stated, TestPAC is not related to listnook the website or company.
39
JRandomHacker172342 Apr 29, 2012 +9
Point of clarification: TestPAC is not affiliated with listnook.com or Listnook, Inc. It was started from listnook, is made up of listnookors, and does a fair bit of coordination in [/r/testpac](/r/testpac), but I just wanted to point out details.
9
Vindictive29 Apr 29, 2012 +6
Here goes: The community as a whole is framing this argument wrong. CISPA is simultaneously undermining your right to control information about yourself while increasing corporations and governments ability to control information about their operations. The concepts of intellectual property and privacy are entangled and by being re-active instead of pro-active, we're sacrificing liberty so that corporations thrive. The primary purpose behind the design and implementation of the internet was to increase the efficiency of scientific research and development. It is built around the value of collaboration; allowing individuals access to facts and theories so that they can advance the rate of human creativity. We should be writing legislation demanding more transparency of the corporations who are utilizing a government project to increase their profits instead of focusing on hitting back when they try to undermine our liberties. Human beings have a right to privacy. Corporations have no such right. Intellectual property rights choke off creativity and productivity for the sake of constricting the number of people who profit from an idea. Yes, creators deserve to be rewarded fro the production of "content"... but hiding the scientific principles surrounding a new technology or burying studies that call into question the value of a product are both slowing the rate of human advancement. I'm not saying to stop defending the right to control your personal information, but we need to create a threat to the power-base of the people attacking us, or its just going to keep happening over and over. Intellectual property protection that extends beyond the lifetime the inventor is insane. We need to stop thinking in the paradigm of the old guard and start breaking new ground, otherwise we WILL lose the war.
6
garja Apr 28, 2012 +212
Ok, so what are *you* going to do? This sounds like a lot of verbiage with no real meaning. >but *your* voice is the one that matters here Very much sounds like you're saying "you're on your own for this one". You made it your own mission to get the word out about SOPA, making the announcement that you did and doing the blackout (saying it was all about protecting freedoms), but now you're letting this one slide? It sounds like you're just trying to placate us...poorly. EDIT: Admittedly, CISPA has only just been hitting the frontpage in the past week, and brainstorming with the community is a good idea. But I am wary of the tone of this post, which is too vague and almost makes it sound like Listnook is trying to shirk responsibility.
212
spladug Apr 28, 2012 +77
From the original post: > ... and how we can help. The key point being that we're not going to make some rash post on a Saturday saying "Ok, everyone! Here's our 12-point action plan!" In the end, it's the sheer number of voters contacting representatives that effects change, not some blog post made by a bunch of nerds in an office.
77
kemitche Apr 28, 2012 +157
Let's not rewrite history here. The anti-SOPA movement and desire to blackout was strong from the community LONG before listnook the company stepped in.
157
shhhhhhhhh Apr 28, 2012 +10
So is it reasonable to rely on Listnook Inc making a stand if the community desire for them to do so is strong enough? Obviously not on any old issue, but this recent onslaught of internet legislation seems very open to abuse, and motivating people to act can be hard.
10
kemitche Apr 28, 2012 +10
If you're *relying* on anyone else to make your stands for you, I believe you need a different strategy. In other words, I can't stand here and make promises that can't necessarily be kept. That said, our primary, fundamental goal is to support the community. Generally, that means by building a site that works and works well, but if it means engaging a bit of political muscle...
10
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +4
You should not expect Listnook to fight every battle. They were good enough to fight SOPA but why should we expect them to fight more? It sets a standard that may discourage them from participating at all in these battles.
4
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +1961
Turning the fight against these bills into another social media phenomenon sounds like a good idea to me.
1961
nicholmikey Apr 29, 2012 +328
I'm not a US citizen so I may not know what I'm talking about, but stop waiting to attack these bills once they are made, and start attacking the system that produces them. Amend your constitution to guarantee digital privacy. You guys keep raising your shields, but never pick up a sword.
328
embolalia Apr 29, 2012 +206
Amending our constitution isn't so easy. (And it's not like [nobody's trying](http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/12/08/385511/bernie-sanders-introduces-occupied-constitutional-amendment-to-ban-corporate-money-in-politics/?mobile=nc).) It's been done 27 times in 223 years. The last one was in 1992. Before that, 1971. And how does one amend the US Constitution? Through Congress, of course. We'd need to get 2/3 of both houses in favor of it which, obviously, they aren't. (Or, we could get 2/3 of the states to band together and propose it, but that has never happened before.) Then, after we've gotten the impossible supermajority in Congress, we'd need to get 3/4 of the states on board. As much as I agree that it's needed, I don't think it's plausible. Jesus. In researching for this post, I just lost the last bit of confidence I had for our democracy. I'mma go cry in a corner for a bit...
206
AmigaAllstar Apr 29, 2012 +4
Constitution amended 27 times in 223 years = once every 8.25925926 years. Last amended in 1992...looks you're around 12 years overdue. Now would be the perfect time, and reason, to make an amendment, especially as we're a part of a digital age that needs addressing.
4
TheSuperSax Apr 29, 2012 +4
D******* the first 10 amendments—the "Bill of Rights" which passed right after ratification and were the means to have many of the states ratify the constitution, and we're left with 17 amendments in 223 years, or once every 13.11765 years. Still a bit overdue. I could continue with a few other things that would reduce the effective rate of amendment but I'll leave stop here for now.
4
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +166
There are two problems. 1. Our constitution DOES protect our rights on the internet, but our lawmakers are ignoring the fourth amendment entirely. In the past 10 years since the patriot act, they have done this entirely too often. Completely ignoring our rights under the guise of 'protecting' us. 2. The way to create another separate amendment is through the same congresspeople who are pushing CISPA. (and SOPA, NDAA etc) The only way we win is when we stop electing people who step on our rights.
166
RsonW Apr 29, 2012 +27
Yep. We don't need an amendment to protect the rights of privacy and due process online, as those rights are secured in all cases already. The problem is that Congress gives f*** all of a care about our Constitution and writes unconstitutional laws anyways. CISPA would be struck down by the courts... eventually... but it's f****** obnoxious to have to deal with systemic violation of rights until then.
27
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +31
[deleted]
31
dominodrake Apr 30, 2012 +2
I was thinking about this the other day. If the “only way we win is when we stop electing people who step on our rights” then lets vote those people out of office. All it takes for something like this to start is by having an idea, ‘Vote to be represented, Not punished’. (I’m not that good at catchy phrases so it is open to refinement, but you get the idea.) Spread this idea around like so many other things are and everyone will realize that the current congressmen are doing more harm than good, and we can elect the proper candidates to be in those offices. Seriously, if people who read this could find ways to tell people to not vote for the current congressmen in office then this idea will start to take effect. I was also questioning myself about the effectiveness of the petition the other day too. I’ve been amazed this year with the success have gotten. So much so that it raised a question for me to ask; could it be possible to have laws revoked by petition? Honestly, if there was a petition that was spread around to remove the NDAA Act, which allows for the detainment of Americans indefinitely without trial, I would sign it along with everyone else I know. Does anyone know if it is possible to get something like this to going?
2
[deleted] May 31, 2012 +2
That is a super interesting idea. Both of them. I agree. About the first idea. I think what we really need is a list based on key ideas that we care about. What if we started a website where you could say the things that are important to you, and then see different congresspeople's views on them? I know I would like that! It can take sooo long to find out how everyone voted on stuff. Maybe it could be wiki style edited too. And include how they voted vs what they say. I would LOVE that! Second idea, that would be cool. How would you go about dealing with opposing petitions? Maybe you could have a vote up and a vote down style petition? Sweet ideas :)
2
inarticulat Apr 29, 2012 +72
why is this not at the top, but a bunch of bullshit obscure jokes are? I appreciate humor, but why not use this venue to actually organize and educate?
72
Eustis Apr 28, 2012 +130
Yeah but how many times will this work? It's getting to be a "listnook cried wolf" situation. We need further action. We need offense, not defense. We as listnookors need to come together and pool our resources and take this to them, not stand idly by and fight the bills as they're getting ready to pass. Right now the government is the enemy, and we're backed in a corner. We can't stand for this. We outnumber and outsmart them in every capacity.
130
Ravanas Apr 29, 2012 +26
Support, and I mean financially support, the EFF. One of the big problems of activism is funding, which is why megacorps have such an easier time of it. We have lobbyists too, however: groups like the EFF. Contributing to them is an easy way to help get your voice heard. And if you truly believe in an open internet, put your money where your mouth is and give to the people who actually go before congress and who do the lobbying. Also, write to your congressmen. This is an important step. Even if they never read what you write personally, the message gets to them. The more impassioned letters they receive from more constituents, the more they will be willing to listen to you. And finally, when it comes time to cast your vote, a) actually do so, and b) remember who stood with you on the issues you care about. For instance, as an 18 year old, I voted for Bush (Al "I invented the internet" Gore didn't sound like an appealing option.) But after the PATRIOT ACT, the TSA, and the DHS, I voted against him in 2004. Similar things will be happening this time around. Have a long memory, and vote the bums out when they don't do what you want. Make them fear for their jobs. They may be power hungry d***** canoes, but they only get their power when we give it to them.
26
Poiar Apr 29, 2012 +35
I'm sorry to say it, but "we" (Listnookors) do not outnumber them by a long shot. People aren't educated on the subject, mostly because they do not care. And if they do not care, they won't take action against the bill. Or maybe they'll even be counteractive because their candidate supports the bill. It seems to me like the smartest thing to do, is to advertise for Listnook (and other politically informed forums), and hope some of the newcomers will stick by. I'm hoping that people in the future will be more politically active, so we Listnookors don't have such a small voice.
35
thealienelite Apr 29, 2012 +3
I would really love to see more listnookors actually give a f***, other than posting memes and stupid pun threads. But I can't help but wonder if that's also because listnook has gotten extremely popular, and thus, attracted more young/immature/stupid people.
3
stoningrolls Apr 28, 2012 +43
r/fia get on board
43
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +2
This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. If you would like to do the same, add the browser extension [TamperMonkey](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tampermonkey/dhdgffkkebhmkfjojejmpbldmpobfkfo) for Chrome (or [GreaseMonkey](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/) for Firefox) and add [this open source script](https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/10380-listnook-overwrite). Then simply click on your username on Listnook, go to the comments tab, and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.
2
mybrandnewaccunt Apr 28, 2012 +75
Most importantly, in my view, is to promptly send the right message to your congressman in the next election, otherwise you will keep fighting a lost battle. America deserves a Congress that represents the american people, not corporations, not lobby groups. Edit: Spelling/better wording.
75
Lightening84 Apr 28, 2012 +39
I'm so glad we have media sites such as listnook that are popular enough to have influence over those who have influence over us. Without Listnook and its great member-base, we would have already succumbed to the influence that was SOPA, and now we have a fighting chance to combat CISPA. The House thought they could slip it under our noses by rushing things, but we still have a chance to keep the internet open and free. Contact your Reps.
39
Internetbon Apr 28, 2012 +1433
Okay so we need a blonde kid sitting at a table and pointing at pictures of CISPA saying like "Why are they recording me daddy?"
1433
ariiiiigold Apr 28, 2012 +262
This is what I propose: I suggest we all somehow procure a giraffe each (or perhaps a hippopotamus), and at a set time and date - let it loose in central D.C. The sudden arrival of thousands and thousands of wild animals will bamboozle those in power, allowing us to take control of the White House. Our first order of business will be to install free cupcake dispensers on the corner of every street. The second will be to write legislation forbidding the introduction of CISPA (and any variants thereof). Then we will live freely and with joy in our hearts.
262
Sallix Apr 28, 2012 +269
Don't forget to write "CISPA" on the animal. That way when people hear about the bill, they will be reminded of the dreadful destruction caused by the rampaging beast and therefore oppose the bill by association. We'll name this the "giraffe veto" and do this with all new bills we don't like. I see no way this can backfire.
269
Cirquedecircle7 Apr 29, 2012 +81
This is why I love you guys so much more than the people I know.
81
rcthedigitalhero Apr 29, 2012 +73
Soo much poop on the streets
73
kdawggg Apr 28, 2012 +34
No way man. You don't f*** with hippos. Giraffes, ok but stay awaayyyyy from the hippos.
34
thenoogler Apr 29, 2012 +50
Especially tiny hippos, aint no one fucks with tiny hippo. Ain't no one. http://poorlydrawnlines.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Tiny-Hippo1.jpg
50
kdawggg Apr 29, 2012 +5
Oh my gosh. That was f****** hilarious. thank you for showing that.
5
NuclearPotatoes Apr 28, 2012 +866
i'll book my flight to san diego
866
MikeTheStone Apr 28, 2012 +700
it looks like someone's a*** is going to be apocalyptic.
700
OnTheBorderOfReality Apr 28, 2012 +112
Jackin it, jackin it, jackity jack. Spankin it, jackin it, spankity smack
112
alahos Apr 28, 2012 +188
"Show me on Teddy where CISPA touched you."
188
Caulibflower Apr 29, 2012 +2
And it'll come out three years from now, be called "SOPA 2015" and be about how we need to stop a terrible piece of legislation from being passed by big meanies.
2
imtheone989 Apr 28, 2012 +34
Or treat CISPA like south park treated the TSA, put CISPA in its place to show everyone how ridiculous the bill is.
34
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +45
Ya, because that worked so well for TSA...
45
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +3
Buy your CISPA action kit now and help us "Plaster the internet" on April 20! CISPA 2012
3
showme_yourmoves Apr 28, 2012 +85
CISPA 2012. MAKE IT FAMOUS.
85
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +9
[deleted]
9
redditMEred Apr 28, 2012 +50
###tomorrow on /r/IAmA... *AMA Request: Listnook Leaders (get your ass back in here and do more about CISPA)*
50
Sumbohdie Apr 28, 2012 +134
Tell *everyone*
134
SkinnyDipRoger Apr 28, 2012 +76
Then the whole attack on internet freedom will be won!!!! for 2 weeks...
76
WorstRedditDetective Apr 28, 2012 +152
Long enough. [Everyone prepare](http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/funny-gifs-conquering-the-world-part-i.gif).
152
unmoderated Apr 28, 2012 +245
[EVERYONE](http://i.imgur.com/27mtT.gif)
245
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +389
[FTFY](http://i.imgur.com/1IsKB.gif)
389
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +370
[deleted]
370
American_Assface Apr 29, 2012 +69
I couldn't have said it better myself. I need a beer.
69
Yossome Apr 29, 2012 +95
I heard this gif in 3 voices.
95
TheJayP Apr 29, 2012 +5
I did too, I also got mesmerized and watched it like 50 times. That was weird and I hope it doesn't happen again.
5
Celebrimbor333 Apr 29, 2012 +29
F****** Corinthian
29
derpledooDLEDOO Apr 29, 2012 +81
holy f*** that's creepy. [7]
81
brunonient Apr 29, 2012 +61
F****** creepy even at [0]
61
gibs Apr 29, 2012 +2
the only thing that scares ~~corrupt~~ politicians more than losing perks from their lobbyists is losing their position. Therefore we need to make it clear that these politicians are wilfully disregarding public interest in favour of lobbyist interests. We *know* they are doing it wilfully because the public was just in a huge uproar of SOPA. And now they immediately go and push through CISPA *right in front of us!* What contempt they must have for us! They are *not* going to stop pushing through these bills and eroding our rights, just because we defeat one bill. The public needs to see it this way, and to get angry about it.
2
trappedinabox Apr 28, 2012 +40
Here are my thoughts: . 1: Until they do go away, **has anyone written an application for smart phones** that can alert someone about this sort of thing? The last thing it needs to do is spam me with messages, but I feel that if people could receive a warning when this shit was about to go down, we could mobilize faster. 2: I barely knew a damn thing about CISPA. Has anyone or can anyone **put together a concise explanation of what CISPA is and can someone perhaps make an animation** of it? I literally do not know how to do any of these things, but the hivemind does, and I think that's what makes us strong as a community. I'm honestly not sure what to do offensively for the time being. But one thing has been clear and it's that these attacks are not going away. After we defeat CISPA we need to have a serious conversation about what kind of legislation we need to pass to go on the offensive.
40
aazav Apr 29, 2012 +8
It seems like we should have a r/billReview sublistnook that actually automatically posts each bill that is up for voting and have a group of people who are able to summarize it. Are all bills that are up for a vote automatically posted on a gov web site? Is there an API that would allow us to automate posting a new topic when a new bill comes up with a copy of the bill for reference?
8
munky82 Apr 29, 2012 +4
As a non American my first reaction is: "Why should I care". Then I remembered an argument made by a fellow countrymen regarding e-tolling in my province*. If it works there (the USA) it will start to appear closer to home, wherever you live. Bad ideas should be stopped before they are spread by bad people. *In South Africa's most economic active province, Gauteng, the government decided to upgrade the intercity, and urban highways (the province is about 100km x 100km in size) This is a good thing, but later on with terrible communication to the public they decided to errect drive through toll gantries. To the public the documents and information were either censored or jumbled. But the information it did give was that the average worker will pay a lot more to get to work. The cost of of living would also increase significantly, harming the poor. The tolling system would be extremely innefecient, at about 50% admin cost, but it also came to light that a lot of backers and investors in the system will coin it big time. So a cheaper alternitive to cover the cost of infrastructure upgrade would be to increase the fuel levy. People in other provinces and cities said this is unfair since they would have to pay. The argument against this was two-fold. First if the system is succesfull it would start popping up in other urban centres within a couple of years. And second, the Gautng province only keeps 40% of the money it generates in the province. The rest is used to fund other provinces, either by taxes, or by profits from external companies, or by workers sending money to their outer province families. So the argument is weak. My point being, if a bad idea works there, it is a matter of time before it wil raise its ugly head here.
4
hintomint Apr 29, 2012 +5
It won't be a free, private, open internet with CISPA. With the threat of there being no internet anonymity, some might argue that free discussions on places such as listnook would no longer exist. I certainly wouldn't feel comfortable posting many things on here in asklistnook, iama, or even some of more nsfw threads knowing someday it could be pulled up and pointed to by the government as proof of who knows what. (I understand how that might help in some cases, but really??) Listnook really needs to realize this. Maybe I'm just not that addicted to Listnook, but if CISPA truly passes I will have to quit this site, among others, and I'm sure I can't be the only one. Maybe I'm just paranoid, but whatever! Plenty of generations before us lived with just books and later TV and it might be a nice return to actually going outdoors and a real break from the internet.
5
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +26
Sorry guys, but to be blunt, I really cared about SOPA and PIPA. I was very vocal about it. CISPA has made it obvious our elected officials don't give a flying f*** about us. The best way to fight this one is just vote them out of office. Theres no way to win with this individual bill. But write and call your congressmen and Senators and explain why you will not be voting for them. My local congressman walks through my town every year, right past my front door during our parade. They'll be getting some boo's from me and my friends this year. Help an elected official that DOES care about our rights run for office. Donate to their campaign. Help raise awareness about them. This is the only way we can actually stop this. Because its been made obvious that what we did to SOPA was just a roadblock. Once they see the whole highway is down, only then will things change.
26
ModernDemagogue Apr 29, 2012 +13
This is a classic non-answer answer. It attempts to paint a picture like "we care" and "your voice is important" by responding in a timely fashion, but without substance; in fact, it even begins to couch the inevitable answer which you will receive; by using terms like "anger" and "confusion" about CISPA, so when they say it really isn't that bad, you might believe them. I've said it for months. The internet went full retard on SOPA, and now privacy will be destroyed. Tech corporations had wildly divergent interests in countering SOPA, but none of them were the reasons people in general cared about; they were all acting in their own self interest with profit in mind (except Wikipedia, they we're pretty good). Anyway, now you're all fucked and the costs will be offloaded to the consumer. Have fun. http://www.listnook.com/r/politics/comments/op9z0/threatening_new_bill_worse_than_sopapipa_make/c3j1j9e http://www.listnook.com/r/politics/comments/op9z0/threatening_new_bill_worse_than_sopapipa_make/c3j1jjj http://www.listnook.com/r/politics/comments/op9z0/threatening_new_bill_worse_than_sopapipa_make/c3j1hl0 http://www.listnook.com/r/politics/comments/p67jz/rep_lamar_smith_author_of_sopa_is_at_it_again/c3mwdbx http://www.listnook.com/r/technology/comments/pndf9/the_pirate_bays_peter_sunde_its_evolution_stupid/c3qsugd Hell, looks like I told kn0thing: "Negotiate a compromise because otherwise you will end up with a shitty bill that destroys the internet." http://www.listnook.com/r/technology/comments/o31og/i_was_on_bloombergtv_talking_sopa_today_howd_i_do/c3eat2l
13
casey3307 Apr 28, 2012 +15
Heres an idea... Lets all email howard stern about CISPA. Sirius just fucked him out of 300 million dollars@ So even if they support CISPA, he wont give a shit. If enough of us email him I am sure he will mention it on air!! Thats 20MILLION newly informed people instantly!!! You know how much Howard hates the FCC because they monitored every word he said... How is this different!? Here is the link to email him on his site! We can do this! http://www.howardstern.com/contact.hs
15
deckman Apr 29, 2012 +5
There comes a point when you realize fighting this one bill isn't the issue (when there or 4-5 similar bills waiting to take its place if this one isn't passed), and that the bigger problem is a Congress that has a 14% approval rating and no longer gives a shit about their ratings or the people. The real problem is a Congress making decisions based not on the needs of the people but on what corporations want and what would best line up their pockets. So in other words, the real problem is a fundamental flaw in the way this government is being chosen and run. I think I realized that the U.S. Congress was a joke when they spent millions of tax payer's money on investigating steroid use in baseball during a failing economy, failing wars in Iraq, failing health care, and a host of other real problems.
5
VirtualProtector Apr 28, 2012 +14
Aren't these bills/legislation like cispa/sopa etc just going to be never ending in the future until the big lobbying companies get there own way? Cynical but realistic attitude until major changes are made with the leaders of this world.
14
idefix24 Apr 28, 2012 +8
So go after the companies supporting it, like we did with SOPA. There are ways to deal with that problem.
8
BlaikeMethazine Apr 28, 2012 +7
I, for one, want to say thank you for this post. Although it is short, it is good to know that the momentum is building over the weekend, and I look forward to increased discussion and activity of this going into next week. Listnook can be a powerful force when it is focused, and I want to prove everyone wrong who says that we could only be tapped once to stop SOPA.
7
FlyinEye Apr 29, 2012 +3
My concern was when everyone came together to fight SOPA was that the internet, excuse this expression, shot it's collective wad. I was afraid that all "they" have to do is keep coming up with Bills like it and people would eventually get tired of fighting them. I'm worried that this is what's happening now. CISPA is worse than SOPA in it's own way but it's not getting the publicity that SOPA & PIPA got. I wish I was wrong about this but people have short attention spans. We won the battle but will eventually lose the war. I hate to be a pessimist but all it's going take is for "them" to just keep writing these kinds of Bills and eventually people won't care enough to even speak out, at least in the numbers it's going to take to stop it. I'm not going to give up but we won't have internet blackout protests every time one of the Bills comes along. The only thing that will slow them down is if we don't vote for the makers of such Bills and they lose their seats in government. This might serve as a warning. Maybe we could make up some kind of list of the supporters and show how many have lost their seats after an election. Make it public enough that the politicians see people them losing votes because of their support.
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +5
The solution, ultimately, is complete civil disobedience. Congress does not have the best interests of even a small majority of Americans at heart. They are betraying us in every way possible, and will continue to build newer, more invasive control mechanisms no matter what we do. Until we rebel and tell them to go to hell.
5
robotripp Apr 29, 2012 +5
CISPA is harmless, I completely believe every single breath coming out of Michael Rogers. We don't REALLY need privacy on the internet, what we need is for the government to take copies of everything we do on the internet (Americans) and scrutinize it. Then they need to prosecute all people who chews Laffy Taffy, jerks with there LEFT hand, shaves only half their balls to surprise the girlfriend, scratches their balls and sniffs it, puts mayo on hash browns, and accidentally visiting a jihad website.
5
CafeNero Apr 29, 2012 +3
**The Online Primary Caucus (TOPC)** Listnook is comprised of liberals, freethinkers, libertarians, pro science agenda caffeinated media influencers. So on a date near the primaries: * 1) get the online privacy listnookors create IRCs/vote mechanism/message boards with some mechanism for controlling bots. One site per congressional district. * 2) People attend the IRC chat site and vote, they select a district leader a Coalition member to act as point person, and a candidate to represent them in the fall. Vote on a list of agenda items. * 3) These winners - the district leaders and their agenda percolate up and we have an online vote perhaps a week later to allow people to digest. * 4) Everyone vows to vote for the Coalition on election day. **Year One goals:** 20 SOPA, CISPA supporters at risk. **Year Three goals:** Congress realizes they must address the Coalition every election. EDIT: modified to IRCs/Vote Mechanism/Message boards with some mechanism for controlling bots.
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +2
I know it's been said in here multiple times, but we are many in numbers. We can all contact our senators and let them know this is a horrible act. If ten or twenty do it, fine. If 200 do it, they begin to notice. 2,000? They begin to sweat. 20,000, you get the idea. Whether they listen to us is another thing, but what they need to realize is that we aren't going to give up on this. Free, open communication and the use of this powerful tool is much more than a room full of out of touch, wealthy people that were elected to listen to our requests to make a better society and ultimately, a better world. Our next step, and this is where I may lose some of you is electoral reform. This cannot continue, and if you wish to improve this joke of a political system that was once so great, you must get involved. The internet, listnook particularly is famous for activism that takes a couple clicks. You want change? Fight for it. I'm not talking about violence, it should never come to that. Work to change your political system, get involved on a local level with the candidates running for Senate positions. I've informed one of my Senators (McCain, R-AZ) that due to his work on the NDAA, I will no longer to continue to support him, and I will spread the word. Most people don't even know that NDAA passed, let alone the verbage of this constitutionally-raping, bill of rights-shitting on piece of garbage. That brings us to Mr. Puppet himself. The presidential elections. The third phase must bring back the vote to the majority, not the minorty. The USA's electoral college is a sham, and a travesty to something that most people would jump, run, swim, sign, sell their souls to be a part of: Democracy and the Freedom that goes along with it. Immigrants (both legal and illegal) come to our country, to experience the freedoms America has to offer, and yet we can't control our own political system. It's not that this is something new, it's been happening for a long time, we just know more about it thanks to....wait for it...you guessed it, the **INTERNET**. All of this is rooted in fear. Fear of power of information. Fear of a bunch of people banding together to fight back (as is welcomed and understood in the American Constitution written by our forefathers). This fear is visible by those who are elected by their constitutency. They receive handouts from lobbyists, and can reword a need to tighten watch over piracy in the name of 'job loss'. I know this is from SOPA, but it's still true with CISPA. Look at the Occupy Movement. In it's infancy, the movement was hard to track, plans were hard to follow if you weren't in the know. This was because TPTB couldn't figure out how information was being passed. Much like the tactics of the Arab Spring, the people could stand and pass information, looking as innocent as checking a sports score or reading the news. Then...they caught on. As they started to crack down on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, getting sites to censor, pull down, or delete material completely they've begun to learn. Clever girl. They realize that the delay comes from them, and have learned our weakness....CSPAN. Not many of us watch it, and I'd be curious to find out how many American listnookors understand the actual passing of a bill into law in the USA. Immigrants who pass our citizenship test know more about our processes than we do. We have been lulled into a sense of security by products and our lazy way of life. We cannot allow generation after generation to slip into ignorance of this. If there are any high school listnookors on here, I'm curious as to how much time is spent on the structure of government, it's process, and current affairs. To sum up, knowledge is key, and for the love of dog **contact your senators**. Jam the phones, write emails, write letters, send postcards with the Mr. Yuk face...something, anything.
2
FORGOTTEN396 Apr 29, 2012 +4
Everyone always says "vote the bums out" just not "our" bum. Well "our" bum is the only one we have a vote on. To fix this and several other problems it may be necessary for a few babies to go out with the bathwater (though not many) for Washington to realize that we can have a voice in the elections. Who are "your" representatives and how did they vote on this and other bills? When are they up for re-election? Do YOU know?
4
tabaghdad Apr 29, 2012 +7
I think the SOPA blackouts worked well to inform people who would otherwise be ignorant to the situation as well as encourage people to contact their senators/representatives. I'd like to try and organize something similar to raise awareness for CISPA.
7
TalkingBackAgain Apr 28, 2012 +3
To send a signal to Congress that these kinds of legislative initiatives must stop, there are two ways [2] that will help prevent this from happening: 1) vote the people who vote for this kind of legislation out of office and vote for people who won't vote for that kind of legislation [by far the **much preferred** way] 2) destroy the people who vote for this kind of legislation [If nothing else works]
3
_deffer_ Apr 29, 2012 +12
[NOVEMBER](http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m36741RBXR1r3273eo1_500.jpg) Remember this in November - don't stand idly by while they pillage our rights. It's not that hard - ***MAKE*** them know that we won't take their shit any longer.
12
Tainster Apr 29, 2012 +4
I certainly appreciate hearing this from Listnook, and I think it's pretty awesome. However, there is something that has bothered me for quite some time and I feel it's relevant to get out here on this thread. SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, and now CISPA are all bills well worthy of rallying against. However there are so many things passed over the past year that should've been aggressively opposed, as much so as these "cyber security" bills, and probably more so. My issue why is that sites like Listnook and Google will chomp at the bit to trash these kind of bills that could affect our freedom on the internet but I never see them rally support against things like NDAA and NDRP? The internet is certainly a worthy cause, but the assault on our liberty and freedom is coming from all angles now. We should be taking a stand against these things as well. We have proven how powerful the internet really is, so why don't we use it to protect freedoms outside the internet and fight government on betrayal of ALL of our liberties and rights, not just the internet? Or could it be that even those that we feel are fighting along side us have no interest unless directly threatens their livelihood and revenue? I strongly feel this is the case. Our power is in numbers, and we access the greatest numbers via the internet. NDAA and NDRP were pretty much in a spotlight on Listnook, but no action was taken. Let's change that and restore America now, not rebuild it after it's too late.
4
wafflestomp Apr 29, 2012 +4
The corporations buy off the government. The government then does their bidding, which generally has negative impacts on both the people and the planet (not just the American people, mind you). The government uses the police and the armed forces to enforce the rules they put in place at the demand of the corporations. And the bulk of the money used to pay for the whole show comes from taxes. Taxes are paid by the public, to the government, who spend that money to bully the public into submission. Privatised prisons, corrupt police departments, illegal wars, forcing religion into schools, allowing companies to go unpunished for environmental destruction and endangering the world's food supplies... the list goes on. Spying on the public is just another step towards controlling the population they feed off. Unfortunately, there is no quick and simple answer to this problem. There is no overnight fix. But President Obama is the closest thing you have to a leader you can trust. Show him that you respect him for the things he has done, are disappointed and feeling let-down for the things he has done wrong (in your opinion), and that you still have hope for the future. I think the best way to do this is through an online guide or similar that outlines all the bills and policies in a TLDR format, with the reasons and repercussions for each. Market the hell out of it not just in social media on the web, but in a leaflet drop where everyone able to prints out a dozen fliers a day, begging people to go and get a rough idea of what parties or candidates they can trust, and which ones are shady as f***, (or outright crooks). Then give them a poll to vote on how they feel about each party or candidate. Don't tell them the poll results until the end, so they can see (based on their choices) which party or candidates left them feeling the most confident and which ones feel like slimy crooks. It has to be fair. You can't just say "Listnook feels this way so this is the right way"- it has to be the voice of the people. ALL the people, or as many as you can reach. On the same site, you could list the candidates for each position with a snopes style (crossed with wikipedia style) breakdown of the broken promises, lies told by or about each one, colour coded, with a graph or pie chart showing each group or party's history in regards to racking up debt, starting wars, telling lies to the public, breaking laws, corruption, etc etc etc... Make it simple enough that a casual browser can skim it and get a rough idea of which member or party is the most dirty, the best for the economy, the most reliable, the most war-hungry, has the most ties to corporations, and uses the most underhanded tactics. These are the issues people want to know about, but most don't have the time or motivation to fully investigate for themselves.
4
casey3307 Apr 28, 2012 +9
Heres an idea... Lets all email howard stern about CISPA. Sirius just fucked him out of 300 million dollars@ So even if they support CISPA, he wont give a shit. If enough of us email him I am sure he will mention it on air!! Thats 20MILLION newly informed people instantly!!! You know how much Howard hates the FCC because they monitored every word he said... How is this different!? Here is the link to email him on his site! We can do this! http://www.howardstern.com/contact.hs
9
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +14
I'm afraid doing the exact same thing again will seem kind of lame in comparison.
14
freemanposse Apr 28, 2012 +6
The only hope we have is to slam through bills forbidding prospective candidates from accepting money from corporate sources. If a candidate can be found to have accepted so much as a stick of gum or a light for his cigarette from a corporate lobbyist, they're immediately disqualified. If a sitting congressman is found to have done so, they're expelled. Until then, the corporations are eventually going to win every fight like this-they can make themselves much more of a threat to a congressman's re-election than we can. The only problem is that at this point, most of our congressmen would sooner resign than vote yes on such a bill.
6
ellevehc Apr 29, 2012 +3
Turning it into a media phenomenon is the best idea for the time being. However, we need to make it EASIER for everyone to KNOW who to VOTE for and HOW to vote. If we made it possible for everyone to vote from their computer, even the laziest listnookor will have his/her voice heard. I believe that the problem really stems from the lack of voting participation and general knowledge about the political field.
3
MySperm Apr 29, 2012 +5
can I just point out that having a "blackout" isn't going to solve anything, look at SOPA for example, it just killed SOPA and they made a bigger bill, we need to take out the root of the problem.
5
tillicum Apr 29, 2012 +3
I have a suggestion to the folks who own and run Listnook: lead by example. The reason why the SOPA protest was so successful was because, beyond the users of social media, the owners of social media sites got directly involved. In the case of CISPA, the major social sites (Facebook, Google, etc) ALREADY collect the data that is asked for in CISPA and ALREADY share, sell and store that data. Social media sites make the bulk of their money selling user data to anyone who is willing to pay for it. If these companies were to come out against CISPA, their very business model could asked to be aired in public, and that is the last thing they want. Did anyone see the expose about the data Facebook is willing to handover on the flimsiest of contexts? It's chilling to say the least. Remember, these are companies that hold not only your name, but address, emails, credit card information, buying patterns, what websites you visit, what you read, what you click and countless other data points. This is information that even those sites who gather it will not share with you, but will release to advertisers. The giant revenue of companies such as Facebook and Google is based on trading and selling your personal information. Now, ask yourself, do you think these companies would block a law which makes the sharing of this information easier? As for Listnook, SOPA threatened their very existence. Listnook is a site a where people could share pics and info from other sites, therefore could have fallen afoul of the restrictions in SOPA, and could have possibly forced Listnook to shutdown. But now, with CISPA, which doesn't target companies and websites, but individuals, Listnook has no stake to lose. That is why there is no big announcement that Listnooks execs will go on the warpath. CISPA does not affect their business plan like SOPA did, so why risk there necks by making themselves a target? What it comes down to is that web "giants" will fight anything that directly affects their business model, revenue stream and very existence tooth and nail. But when it comes to something that would solely affect their users, they could care less as long as they can exploit it to make some more money. Take a look at the penalties or fines that major tech companies have paid for privacy transgessions and compare that to the profits they made. Do you really think that these companies will fight to protect the very same people that they are exploiting as long as it doesn't affect their bottom line? That's why the powers be at Listnook have been so quiet. They have nothing to gain and nothing to lose vis a vis CISPA. So why should they put their corporate neck on the line for something which does not affect their bottom line and something that will not harm their business model should the act pass? Because it does not affect them, therefore they don't care. No business will pick a fight if they are not threatened, and Listnook is no different. Which is a shame. If Listnook lead as zealously in this fight as they did against SOPA, it could make a difference. Instead they opted for a tepid statement and a half hearted call to action.
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +2
Its not just contact details I'm bothered with them sharing, its habitual activities, interests and a general profile of who I am nd what I do that I don't want spread and used against me in either advertising or potential terrorist/activist or other bad guy 'proof' for any investigative arm of the law. Its easy to say he googled thorium power plants therefore he plans to steal some and make a device of destruction. I don't want or need a label. Especially not for reading junk online when bored.
2
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +4
As someone who has done very little research on CISPA and whatever other scary proposed legislation is currently threatening our internet freedom, I can say that it will be difficult to get people to care about it like we did with SOPA. I was well informed during that debacle (SOPA/PIPA), and I spread the information to everyone I could, but that almost makes CISPA seem even more insurmountable. I know this probably isn't the case, but to the average internet user it almost feels hopeless. Like no matter what we oppose, the government will just come up with a new scarier bill with a new name. I guess I'm saying it's going to be hard to get people to rally against CISPA like we did with SOPA because it feels like we already fought so hard against it to no avail.
4
QuickTactical Apr 28, 2012 +3
**We need to be proactive.** Gather legal experts and the common knowledge of listnookors to draft legislation that protects the Internet's freedom, anonymity, and neutrality and submit it to our legislators. Calling/writing legislators to let them know we will not stand for this shit also helps.
3
i-dont-have-a-gun Apr 29, 2012 +6
I hope Stop CISPA catches on like Kony 2012 did, then something might actually happen.
6
Frogman7 Apr 29, 2012 +3
I think there needs to be an act for internet freedom. I believe there was a post about it before and I believe it is completely necessary. Because the United Staes have passed a bill it will affect the word, I live in Australia and it will definitely affect me as well. It's just not fair
3
bieledac Apr 28, 2012 +3
how about funding a lobby that would work full-time in DC and educate the legislators about these "cyber" issues - it could be staffed with individuals who have experience in IT and a passion for activism. Listnook has shown some deep pockets in the past, I bet we could make something work.
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +11
Am I the only one who read this and found it to be a series of meaningless platitudes without out taking any sort of stance?
11
syuk Apr 28, 2012 +3
I am happy to do an IAMA, I think the blackouts were powerful before but didn't really negatively influence 'everyday' people enough to make them consider the future under what is being short sightedly considered. Listnook doesn't just have an Opportunity, we have a Responsibility.
3
lewisflude Apr 28, 2012 +5
Nice one Listnook! I'm gonna try and do something. Maybe I'll make a protest pizza.
5
Strug-ga-ling Apr 29, 2012 +3
Forgive my ignorance, but how likely is CISPA to actually pass through in the Senate? Crazy/stupid legislation is passed by the House all the time, only to die a messy death in the Senate...and Obama has publicly said he'd veto the shit outta CISPA if it makes his desk.
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +3
Are there any bills that open the internet rather than close it so that we can affirm a free and private internet rather than constantly fighting off closures? I would much rather be for something than continually fending off an unending stream of noxious bills.
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +3
[removed]
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +3
You're right. Everytime we stop one act, they rename it and put it back out. But we can't stop. We can't let a single bill pass, because when we do, we lose. We lose the fight, and our freedom. We have to keep fighting.
3
requiemsword Apr 28, 2012 +56
We did so well on SOPA, lets not fall short this time.
56
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +20
As long as everyone contributes, it will go well.
20
tptbrg95 Apr 28, 2012 +12
The hard part is getting everhone to contribute. Most people will have the "can't someone else do it" attitude.
12
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +4
Or, more likely either not knowing how to contribute or contributing in a misinformed, unproductive or counter-productive way.
4
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +3
like this submission said, Listnook alone can't change the course of this bill. Only people as a whole can. Stop being socially awkward and sitting on your f****** c*** and call your state reps. Don't expect someone else to do it. I called and emailed.
3
canadafuckyeah Apr 28, 2012 +111
----E ----E ----E Everyone grab a pitchfork
111
atypicalmale Apr 28, 2012 +76
Torches! Get your flamin' torches here! ---<~ ---<~ ---<~
76
UnitedStatesSenate Apr 28, 2012 +58
---< f***
58
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +27
I think we have a spy.
27
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +77
[deleted]
77
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +36
Þ Þ Þ Pacifiers for the racists?
36
MrTheSpork Apr 28, 2012 +114
E---- Wait, shit
114
tyler2k Apr 28, 2012 +131
Hey said pitchfork, not a rake
131
MrTheSpork Apr 28, 2012 +71
I don't know what went wrong, lemme try again. ----e Dammit.
71
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +42
[deleted]
42
MrTheSpork Apr 28, 2012 +51
Okay, hold on ---ǝ- Now how did that get over there?
51
nixonrichard Apr 28, 2012 +81
Here's an old one of mine you can use but it's kinda broken: ----F
81
MrTheSpork Apr 28, 2012 +59
This should work for now... ----l Wow, sorry about that
59
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +27
[deleted]
27
MrTheSpork Apr 28, 2012 +15
I hope so... ----B Well, that's a new one.
15
adezvj Apr 28, 2012 +56
...We're fucked, aren't we?
56
Badger2qrd Apr 29, 2012 +8
BRING IN THE NERDS! WE NEED PITCHFORKS A.S.A.P!
8
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +37
Must have bought it from IKEA
37
noseeme Apr 28, 2012 +44
Got my pitchfork right here. 8====D
44
avenx Apr 29, 2012 +12
No, that's a smiley face in a chef's hat.
12
SenselessNoise Apr 29, 2012 +4
Make sure you stop by [/r/CISPA](/r/CISPA) for more info, and to ask any questions. We could use more readers.
4
Anon_is_a_Meme Apr 28, 2012 +3
>That’s the listnook that we’re proud to be a part of, and it’s our responsibility as citizens and a community to identify, rally against, and take action against legislation that impacts our internet freedoms. That's a good idea.
3
WackyWarrior Apr 28, 2012 +3
We could all support the opponents of the people who voted for it in the next election. With such a large and devoted following Listnook could be a very good interest group for the protection of internet freedom.
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +6
Does this mean the protest is off? :/ *puts pitchfork down*
6
Chunkys Apr 28, 2012 +5
It's the mentality that underlies all of SOPA, PIPA, and CISPA that needs to be fought. These bills can't be entirely dealt with one at a time - they'll continue to be re-hashed again and again. We need a much broader discussion about internet privacy and rights!
5
me_jane_you_jane Apr 29, 2012 +5
Besides resisting legislation, the most important thing Listnook could do is **innovate technology** to make it hard for something like CISPA to stick. **Make Listnook** **1. Decentralized.** **2. Encrypted.** This may sound like a throw-back to NNTP and IRC, but why not rebuild Listnook as a network of independent servers distributed throughout the world? These days, corporate software can have a substantial open source component, with feet in both worlds. Why can't a corporate social networking site have one foot firmly planted in technologies that radically protect the privacy of its users? The only thing that will stop these laws are technologies that make enforcement so costly as to be nearly impossible.
5
OceanicZen Apr 29, 2012 +3
Let's pull a KONY. Agree on a date, elect a graphic artist to create an image and we'll all print it out and glue it to buildings. Fight fire with fire. Or is this mayhaps water I'm talking about?
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2012 +14
Thank you! This is going to be an up hill battle considering the corporate support behind CISPA. If anything we need more involvement from the community this time around to compensate.
14
Smokiee Apr 29, 2012 +2
as i said before, the USA is becoming a police state, or rather a state like big brother from 1984. first they will flout the laws of your land, then comes freedom of speech, soon there will be drones going around, cameras everywhere and in the end a police force who will raid anyone without a warrent, check back in 5 to 10 years if you are lucky enough to be on the net and say what has happened. with new tech, quantum computers and nano robots, you can spy on anyone you wish and save everyones e-mail, anything. good luck from Britain, we will see it sooner
2
[deleted] Apr 29, 2012 +3
You know what I think we should do? I think we should write our own bill that will attempt to please both parties. Or send a proposal that would meet in the middle of both views.
3
← Back to Board