· 76 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 26, 2026 at 4:29 PM

A small plane crash near Minneapolis kills North Dakota state legislator and the pilot

Posted by AudibleNod


A small plane crash near Minneapolis kills North Dakota state legislator and the pilot
AP News
A small plane crash near Minneapolis kills North Dakota state legislator and the pilot
A small plane crash near Minneapolis on Saturday has killed North Dakota state legislator Liz Conmy and the pilot.

🚩 Report this post

76 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
PenisRancherYoloSwag 2 days ago +1786
>The North Dakota Democratic–Nonpartisan League Party, an affiliate of the national Democratic Party, confirmed Conmy’s death in a social media post, calling her a champion for public education, the environment, and transparency Sounds like we lost a real one — RIP
1786
Hoshbrowns 2 days ago +268
It definitely does sound like we lost a real one. My friend went to Purdue to become a pilot and we went to Fort Lauderdale our senior year. We rented one of these planes and flew down the coastline over Miami and back. It was simultaneously the coolest and scariest experience ever. I would still go up with him again since he's an excellent pilot and I've been a part of seeing his career grow every time he advanced to a bigger plane. There was one moment less than 15 seconds into takeoff while climbing that we dropped at least a few feet because of turbulence. I just focused on my friend's demeanor to determine if I should be worried or not. My other friend turned his hand purple because he had it a seatbelt wrapped around it but he wouldn't let go. I don't think he will ever get in any plane again
268
KubelsKitchen 2 days ago +98
Paul Wellstone vibes.
98
Fun_Skirt8220 1 day ago +21
Exactly what i thought first 🥲
21
Head-Engineering-847 1 day ago -17
Reminds me of the plane that crashed into a house last year
-17
Financial-Desk-669 2 days ago +458
Damn. Condolences to the families of both.
458
doyouevenIift 2 days ago +455
Those single prop planes scare me. Never been in one but these crashes always seem to involve one
455
Morak73 2 days ago +311
A family member owned one. He took me up about a dozen times. He was crazy obsessive about maintenance and his preflight checklist. To my knowledge he never had an in flight problem. I recall a couple weeks where he shut it all down during preflight and took a rental car home.
311
Reyna_girlie 2 days ago +141
Understandable. Would rather pay a few hundred euros or whatever to drive home then crash on my way back. Even if id survive, thats a lot more then a few hundred bucks lol
141
Economy-System1922 2 days ago +97
Yeah, they happen all the time and usually don't make the news. This one did simply because it involved a politician.
97
freedfg 1 day ago +40
The racing world lost some real good ones in the last year and over the years. Scary shit.
40
severedreprise 20 hr ago +2
Alaskan here. ALL the time.
2
CMDR_omnicognate 2 days ago +52
To be fair that’s kinda a survivorship bias type thing. Most crashes involve single prop small planes because most planes are single prop small planes. Outside of airliners I guess, but they’re built with waaaaaaay more tolerances, better trained pilots and are pretty much constantly inspected.
52
zeCrazyEye 1 day ago +23
It is all of the above tbh. Survivorship bias because there are so many, but also there's far less maintenance oversight, and far less redundancy. They are less safe *and* there are a ton of them.
23
MeeseShoop 2 days ago +27
Small planes generally also fly shittier routes.
27
metisdesigns 1 day ago +5
Not exactly. There are roughly 1000 small plane crashes in the USA annually. About 200 fatal. That's out of less than 160,000 small planes. Compare that to about 10,000 commercial planes and while recently there have been a few crashes, it's quite rare. I think we have to go back to 2009 before last year. Yes, there are about 16 small planes for every commercial plane, but they crash significantly more often.
5
RainyDayColor 2 days ago +23
It seems that way because there are far more private single engine planes flying than commercial multi-engine aircraft. Most general aviation mishaps are caused by pilot error, with comparatively and predominantly low experience pilots. Unfortunately there is a tendency for complacency when it comes to continually practicing emergency flight procedures, with too many recreational pilots assuming “one and done” after limited formal flight instruction. While it’s almost always advantageous to have more than one engine, with sufficient training and proficiency a single-engine plane without that single engine fully operational can still safely land; gliders do it all the time. So while single-engine is not necessarily an inherently unsafe aircraft design, there are many contributing external factors that can make it appear to be. Having said that, the one time I was a passenger in a private plane with engine failure and fire that successfully completed a declared emergency landing at Santa Monica airport with firetrucks, sirens, foam, the whole enchilada, I was bigly thankful that it was a Cessna 414 with two engines, with a multi commercially rated, cool calm and collected pilot with many hours/years of training and experience. Still my knees knocked for a good 30 minutes afterwards and I bummed an indescribably therapeutic cigarette from an airport worker after having quit for many years.
23
icantsurf 1 day ago +21
> Most general aviation mishaps are caused by pilot error, with comparatively and predominantly low experience pilots. It's crazy how many of these GA crashes were doomed before they even take off. I've watched a lot of videos going over GA crashes and so many are just doing goofy shit like trying to take off overweight, or ignoring the weather and flying into stuff they're not rated for.
21
RainyDayColor 1 day ago +7
Yeah folks thinking they're a bush pilot until they aren't. It is incomprehensible to me now that anyone would fly anything in my mountainous Western coastal US region without IFR instrument rating. It's well known that conditions can and do change in moments. Full disclosure of personal shame -- when I was young and dumb I enthusiastically got into a number of private planes, many headed over the Cascades or open water, without even thinking to first confirm that the private pilot was sufficiently rated. "On a wing and a prayer." SMDH.
7
icantsurf 1 day ago +4
Yeah, most of the time they manage to make it through fine but it just takes once mishap and the consequences are extreme. I've really grown to appreciate the professionalism and safety culture of commercial pilots and airlines as I've grown older. Glad you're still with us and just have some slightly "shameful" stories to share haha. I bet flying in that region has some spectacular views.
4
bobnuthead 1 day ago +3
I’m a huge proponent of people getting their Instrument rating, but 9 months of the year if you go VFR into IMC over the Cascades (or lots of other places), icing can become the more major emergency, quickly. Anyway, if anyone needs a CFII in the PNW let me know.
3
meow696 1 day ago +5
A friend of mine lost a parent recently to a crash in a similar plane. Scary.
5
M_H_M_F 1 day ago +3
Regulations on GA (general aviation) and commercial are wildly different. While GA is strict, it is a lot more lenient on things like inspections and repair when compared to commercial.
3
ohwrite 2 days ago +2
And bad weather
2
ArrowheadDZ 1 day ago +4
About 150 people die every day in US car crashes. To put that in perspective, if you live in a town of 7,000, that’s one person per year. In a city of 70,000, that’s about 10 a year. In a metro city of 700,000, that’s about 100 per year. In a metro of 7 million, that’s 1,000 per year, or 3 a day. (And sarcastically, those are almost always single-engine vehicles 😋) They happen so frequently that they rarely make the news. This makes other activities seem insanely dangerous by comparison.
4
thefanciestcat 18 hr ago +1
Based on 2024's numbers, it's closer to 108/day in the US. It also works out to 1.2 deaths every 100,000,000 miles traveled. While not national news, local news mostly covers them.
1
NothingLikeCoffee 2 days ago -25
There's a reason insurance companies don't really cover them.
-25
Professional_Read413 2 days ago +8
They definitely do, cost just varies widely based on pilot "time in type" and what ratings they hold
8
Fast-Government-4366 2 days ago +7
This isn’t true. I pay $60 a month for my insurance. My car insurance is more expensive lol.
7
LedgerLawFirm 2 days ago +49
Small aircraft accidents fall under NTSB jurisdiction and the investigation will look hard at maintenance records, pilot hours, and weather data. When a public official is among the victims, wrongful death standing in Minnesota can extend to estate representatives and sometimes the state itself depending on the circumstances of travel.
49
A_Nonny_Muse 2 days ago +65
The smaller the plane, the more dangerous it is.
65
Professional_Read413 2 days ago -92
So an ultralight is more dangerous than a super unstable acrobatic plane?
-92
A_Nonny_Muse 2 days ago +88
2026 Still not understanding general rules of thumb vs. specific instances.
88
Least-Worth-8634 2 days ago +19
But this corner case doesn't apply, idiot/s
19
A_Nonny_Muse 2 days ago +10
I'm citing the [National Traffic Safety Board](https://www.ntsb.gov/Advocacy/mwl/Pages/mwl-2.aspx). Also the AOPA Air Safety Institute, this is considered the most comprehensive private analysis of General Aviation (GA) safety in the U.S. The 35th McSpadden Report cites that while general aviation safety is improving, the disparity remains stark. In 2023, the GA fatal accident rate was 0.65 per 100,000 flight hours, compared to zero fatal accidents for scheduled commercial airlines in the same period.
10
Least-Worth-8634 1 day ago +13
Sorry, I was agreeing with you, poking fun at the other commentor
13
A_Nonny_Muse 1 day ago +7
Sorry, I realized too late and modified the post accordingly, yet left the citation. We're cool. I'm a half dumbass.
7
Professional_Read413 1 day ago -16
That's not what you said though, but ok
-16
A_Nonny_Muse 1 day ago +9
Sure, you just keep thinking that, genius
9
Professional_Read413 1 day ago -6
Thanks I will
-6
freedfg 1 day ago +39
I'm choosing to believe it was taken down by Republican Christian space lasers. That aside, terrible for their families.
39
gosioux 1 day ago +5
Those can only hit non moving forests. They don't have the ability to hit objects in motion. 
5
LoosenGoosen 1 day ago +3
Considering the number of flights that lawmakers, politicians take annually, it's still the safest manner of travel. Considering the past 30 years or so, this is a list of fatal aircrafts: the U.S. political figures I can verify as having died in plane crashes are: Liz Conmy — North Dakota state representative, killed in 2026. Ted Stevens — former Alaska senator, killed in 2010, which is outside the 25-year window, so not counted. Paul Wellstone — Minnesota senator, killed in 2002. Mel Carnahan — Missouri governor and Senate candidate, killed in 2000. Ron Brown — U.S. Commerce Secretary, killed in 1996. George Mickelson — South Dakota governor, killed in 1993. John Tower — former Texas senator, killed in 1991. John Heinz — Pennsylvania senator, killed in 1991.
3
steelbeamsdankmemes 1 day ago +4
Dang, used to live down the street from this airport.
4
you_killed_my_ 1 day ago +3
I wish my family members didn't fly in tiny planes. Statistically they are not as safe as would make me feel comfortable Rip
3
iGoalie 1 day ago +1
Wow, that airport is like 5 miles from my house and I heard nothing about this till now
1
[deleted] 2 days ago -58
[deleted]
-58
[deleted] 2 days ago +41
[deleted]
41
chonky_tortoise 2 days ago +5
Wtf has happened to Listnook, every single thread is conspiracy bullshit. Sometimes planes crash.
5
Spiritual-Pear-1349 2 days ago -99
Imagine if the US didnt fire all their aircraft controlers
-99
TheOtherSkywalker_ 2 days ago +57
There is zero indication that this crash is due to a lack of atc
57
FOTY2015 2 days ago +25
Because crashing into the ground immediately after takeoff is due to a lack of controllers telling the pilot to stay in the air?
25
Professional_Read413 2 days ago +12
Yeah thats not what this is, like at all
12
Mikey_MiG 1 day ago +5
Not only did we not fire any controllers, but ATC played no role whatsoever in the crash. And GA aircraft operate into and out of uncontrolled airports *all the f****** time*. Please just don’t comment when you don’t know what you’re talking about.
5
Spiritual-Pear-1349 1 day ago -2
Ye you too
-2
LoremasterMotoss 2 days ago +8
Small aircraft just like this crash weekly in the US and also are mostly uncontrolled traffic (aka air traffic control staffing almost never has anything to do with small aircraft crashes) For instance, here is the NTSB database of accidents and incidents. If you select the last full month here (March 1 to April 1), you get twenty fatal accidents. There are many more that instead result in serious injuries, light injuries, or only property / plane damage. [NTSB CAROL](https://my.ntsb.gov/aviation)
8
MrHIGHdeas 2 days ago +8
Democratic lawmaker killed in crash? Better to look at the CIA over ATC.
8
pineapple192 2 days ago -3
True. But being from ND; she probably doesn't have a lot of influence politically so I don't think the CIA would waste their time on this one.
-3
External_Counter378 2 days ago -3
But as a lawmaker the odds she found herself at a party and witnessed something are higher than the average bear.
-3
Head-Engineering-847 1 day ago +1
https://ndlegis.gov/assembly/69-2025/committees/joint/human-trafficking-commission
1
Head-Engineering-847 1 day ago
https://ndlegis.gov/assembly/69-2025/committees/joint/human-trafficking-commission
0
S1GMA 2 days ago +3
How many air traffic controllers were fired and when?
3
2018birdie 1 day ago +1
None... unless you mean in 1981. (Well, not you but the original poster who made the ignorant comment)
1
Spiritual-Pear-1349 2 days ago -18
You live under a rock? This entire year they've been working double shifts because theres not enough of them. They got purged by DOGE then there was a bunch of plane crashes because the ones left were controlling 2-3 at a time.
-18
Bizarrebazaars 1 day ago +3
While true that there is a shortage of ATCs, they’re overworked, and that DOGE tried to force some controllers out during the federal agencies purge, and the “Five Things/Fork in the Road” time, not that many voluntarily took the paid departure or got fired from the FAA. Additionally, let’s be real here, the vast majority of Americans would never be qualified to be ATCs just simply based on basic medical clearance alone (LOTS of conditions make you ineligible). Or the no cannabis or drugs thing, plus a LONG laundry list of prescription drugs “no-gos”…. And that’s aside from a crazy difficult work schedule, mandatory overtime, rare time off for family holidays and events, and much more. To add, many prospective controller hopefuls don’t even make it past initial classroom trainings and “wash out”/fail. TL;DR: the ATC situation is multi-faceted 
3
2018birdie 1 day ago +1
Close.  Controllers were not eligible for the early retirement option. DOGE fired no air traffic controllers 
1
Spiritual-Pear-1349 1 day ago -2
Also can't apply if youre over 31, so thats a big chunk of people gone
-2
2018birdie 1 day ago +3
This is false. No controllers were fired by DOGE
3
S1GMA 2 days ago +3
Sorry, I'm not American so yelling insults and saying a bunch of bullshit shit without any informatiom behind it doesn't work.
3
[deleted] 2 days ago -3
[removed]
-3
S1GMA 2 days ago +2
So, still nothing of substance to back it up.
2
[deleted] 2 days ago +5
[removed]
5
S1GMA 2 days ago +8
None of those articles mentioned Air Traffic Controllers being fired except the one from Fortune specifically mentioning that Air Traffic Controllers **were not** fired. Again with insults.
8
[deleted] 2 days ago +4
[removed]
4
S1GMA 2 days ago +11
I respectfully took the time to read the articles you posted. That's why I was able to specifically mention the one from Fortune saying Air Traffic Controllers **were not** fired. *Deleted responses with no apology for spreading misinformation. For someone who's not American, /u/Spiritual-Pear-1349, you sure do follow their playbook.
11
slip101 1 day ago -4
New midterms strategy?
-4
← Back to Board