· 191 comments · Save ·
Announcements Dec 15, 2009 at 12:37 AM

About the little red "NSFW" that appears next to posts...

Posted by KeyserSosa

We just added a [preference](/prefs) to turn it off if it makes your eyes bleed and/or offends your sensibilities. It's under "content options"
🚩 Report this post

191 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +786
Oh, and just to make this not safe for work: poop
786
j-mar Dec 15, 2009 +19
What does 'make safe(r) for work' do?
19
KeyserSosa Dec 15, 2009 +21
Hides thumbnails of NSFW content (whether it has NSFW in the title or comes from an over 18 sublistnook).
21
j-mar Dec 15, 2009 +10
Why thank you.
10
KeyserSosa Dec 15, 2009 +538
Hey! C'mon! Keep the 4-letter words to a mimimum! I mean what the f***!
538
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +349
[deleted]
349
Chrisisawarmgun Dec 15, 2009 +29
My damn weiner kids are listening
29
pavs Dec 15, 2009 +208
“Will Smith don't got to cuss in his raps to sell records - well I do, so f*** him and f*** you too” ~ Eminem
208
Darth_Mike Dec 15, 2009 +166
"Eminem's gotta cuss in his raps to sell records, well me too, so f*** Will Smith" - Jimmy Pop
166
Lut3s Dec 15, 2009 +65
That dont rhyme.
65
kronholm Dec 15, 2009 +59
Drats.
59
Lut3s Dec 15, 2009 +46
For everyone wondering, this person did get the reference.
46
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +2
I love bloodhound gang. Half of it is for that little tracks on the album
2
Sonewall Dec 15, 2009 +10
I find your lack of faith in Darth_Mike disturbing...
10
Lut3s Dec 15, 2009 +37
For everyone wondering, this person did not.
37
PenseurLibre Jan 7, 2010 +1
You mean don't; Right, b****?
1
lebelgedu91 Jan 31, 2010 +1
He is choosing a dvd for tonight
1
thom5r Dec 15, 2009 +4
Awesome. What song is that? Edit: ignore that, I remembered an invention called the search engine.
4
SonicSam Dec 15, 2009 +4
>Dissed by Eminem but did it bother him (yup) But he classy Big Will just get another 20 mil And walk right pass E. I'm a nice guy why y'all harassing me?!
4
rickiibeta Dec 15, 2009 +3
no one here seems to get [your reference.](http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/willsmith/mrniceguy.html)
3
TMI-nternets Dec 15, 2009 +6
Meh, commercial rap is *such* a pissing contest.
6
notv Dec 15, 2009 +10
I always thought 'Teenager Warning - No Explicit Lyrics' would be an apt sticker for my releases...
10
NegativeK Dec 15, 2009 +9
Was it bad that I saw apt and thought of apt-get, then saw releases and confirmed my suspicion.. Only to have you dash my hopes of combining explicit lyrics references and Debian package management?
9
grgcnnr Dec 15, 2009 +4
it was totally inappropriate. you should be using aptitude
4
maniaq Dec 15, 2009 +3
so I should stop looking for a repository, huh?
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +2
Most rap (Not aimed at nerdy white kids) is a pissing contest. Even grime is a pissing contest. In fact, I think most of humanity's culture is a pissing contest.
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +7
[deleted]
7
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +78
This is roughly where the joke died.
78
bdfortin Dec 15, 2009 +5
B****, b****, b****.
5
therealreptar Dec 15, 2009 +35
I HAVE HAD IT WITH THESE MONKEY-FIGHTING SNAKES ON THIS MONDAY-TO-FRIDAY PLANE!!!
35
loquacious Dec 15, 2009 +11
What the f***? I'll tell you what the f****** f***! You cuntpunching popefelcher! What kind of shitty f****** language is this? I thought this was a f****** family site! You f****** fuckers couldn't f*** shit with a shit-stirring stick stuck upright in a flaming bag of c***, you jewburning, nunshitting christ-fuckers! I'll teach your grandmother to f*** eggs! You cocksucking motherfuckers couldn't shit in a c*** even if your titties were f****** on fire! tl;dr: Shitcock. Edit: Please don't ban me. I like my f****** username, you f*****! This crapflood of profanity is sponsored by Shitty Earl's Crazy F****** Plumbers.
11
reductionist Dec 15, 2009 +3
Truly inspired cursing guy.
3
TheReligulousOne Dec 15, 2009 +2
Take it easy you c***-juggling thunder-c*** my little shit-bricks are reading all your foul f****** language. F***.
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
Upcoted for shitcock.
3
loquacious Dec 15, 2009 +1
But not for using all 7 of the FCC "banned words" in one grammatically correct sentence? Cocksucker! ;)
1
budalicious Dec 15, 2009 +1
Poop! You poop mouth. Get all that poop out of your mouth.
1
loquacious Dec 15, 2009 +2
I can't. I'm too busy kissing your mom.
2
parkourlewis Dec 15, 2009 +24
[Class it up some](http://twitter.com/ryanqnorth/status/6337728595), please.
24
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +8
[deleted]
8
Acidworm Dec 15, 2009 +6
http://xkcd.com/75/
6
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
One particularly rough day at work, I wanted to b****, but self-censored myself. "This poop f****** sucks" was my gripe.
1
Dafuzz Dec 15, 2009 +8
I saw the "NSFW" tag, and was shocked, as this post seems rather innocuous. I'm very glad I waited until I got home to read this, you trickster.
8
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +29
[deleted]
29
kloo2yoo Dec 15, 2009 +20
I see a little silhouetto of a red.
20
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +19
What'd he do? What'd he do? Post a naked prego?
19
charliedayman Dec 15, 2009 +11
Thunderthighs and child things! Very, very frightening me!
11
roganartu Dec 15, 2009 +1
P********** and lighting, very very tightening her.
1
Shadowrose Dec 15, 2009 +7
Is that related to a little red rocket?
7
workroom Dec 15, 2009 +24
I think the [A] stands for a***.
24
redditnoob Dec 15, 2009 +1
Heh I laughed at "little red rocket" because it reminded me of a _puppy's penis_.
1
Shadowrose Dec 15, 2009 +4
Hey! You got the [joke](http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=red%20rocket)!
4
Spoggerific Dec 15, 2009 +5
What's with the complete lack of capital letters on the preference page?
5
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +6
The same thing as the complete lack of capital letters on most other pages on listnook.
6
supaphly42 Dec 15, 2009 +13
They take more bandwidth.
13
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +13
You have just given me a great power.
13
parkourlewis Dec 15, 2009 +8
He's got a red glow. Just like the Shogun of Harlem.
8
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +8
**Sho'nuff**!
8
MechaAaronBurr Dec 15, 2009 +8
Woah. Woah. Woah. *Language*, mister. This is a family internet.
8
pegothejerk Dec 15, 2009 +4
manson, maybe.
4
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
I don't get you. Why is [An enclosed superstructure at the stern of a ship](http://www.thefreedictionary.com/poop) NSFW?
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
i don't want to add to anyone's workload, but i can't get this request "voted up" enough as a post to get it noticed. it would be so freaking great if on a listnook admin page the "spam" link would be a different color or something if there was new spam there. icing on the cake would be some way to remove from view spam that's decidedly spam, just so it isn't re-thought about every time one visits the 'spam' folder. ThAnKyOu!
1
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +2
I promise we're well aware of the deficiencies in the current system. Change is coming. Not soon, but we're working on it as fast as we can.
2
bondagegirl Dec 15, 2009 +2
Am I the only one that got a chuckle out of the honesty of this: >Change is coming. Not soon Things are gonna change man, just you know... not soon. One day though. It'll be *great*!
2
ubuwalker31 Dec 15, 2009 +1
Can you take the handcuffs off now, please?
1
Capitol62 Dec 15, 2009 +2
Any chance you can "make safe(r) for work" change the blazing red NSFW to listnook blue NSFW? Blazing red NSFW kinda sticks out as... well... NSFW while at work. Great feature though.
2
geekdad Dec 15, 2009 +1
Hey raldi... can you look at [this post](http://www.listnook.com/r/listnook.com/comments/a92n6/listnook_admins_if_i_am_logged_in_and_i_have_i_am/) I made a week or so ago? since we are on the topic of NSFW and all
1
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +1
That's a question / suggestion for KeyserSosa.
1
VulturE Dec 15, 2009 +1
Thanks. It was annoying as hell to have TrueListnook displayed as NSFW every time cause the admin arbitrarily used it for poor reasons.
1
toba Dec 15, 2009 +3
The scarlet letter.
3
jedberg Dec 15, 2009 -3
If you are in 4th grade, apparently retard is a bad word. So is stupid. They have a lot of bad words actually...
-3
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +17
I'm sure that serves to retard the development of their vocabulary.
17
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +15
[deleted]
15
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +2
He called the shit "poop!"
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
Ooh, F and A. What happens if you have [F, A, M, and S]? I hope it makes FAMS.
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +7
> What happens if you have [F, A, M, and S]? you get A Flying Spaghetti Monster
7
snarkhunter Dec 15, 2009 +30
The f***? We have preferences?
30
KeyserSosa Dec 15, 2009 +14
Welcome to listnook! *\*\*hands sharkhunter some bacon.\*\**
14
snarkhunter Dec 15, 2009 +20
I don't fry my bacon. I spear it on a narwhal tusk and roast that on a fire. A fire fueled by burning Twilight books.
20
myotheralt Dec 15, 2009 +15
I wouldn't let Twilight books anywhere near my fire, the fire might get contaminated.
15
sodypop Dec 15, 2009 +5
[Here you go.](http://i.imgur.com/JfhoK.png)
5
mayonesa Dec 15, 2009 +11
Is there an option to change it to say A*** in red?
11
KeyserSosa Dec 15, 2009 -3
Not at the moment, but I'll make sure to dispatch that request to our room full of an infinite number monkeys with an infinite number of keyboards.
-3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +19
Can you tell them to stop posting already?
19
mayonesa Dec 15, 2009 +8
Sweet! Maybe you can get them to listen to nu-metal while they do it.
8
tazmanic Dec 15, 2009 +3
Have you ever yelled at a monkey for writing "it was the blurst of times"?
3
sandrc2002 Dec 15, 2009 +3
Are they the ones that worked out a script for Hamlet?
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +7
[ ] Hide thumbnails that are not safe for work (NSFW)
7
KeyserSosa Dec 15, 2009 -4
Yeah, I agree: that makes more sense than "make safe(r) for work". We'll probably tweak that on our next deploy.
-4
captainron Dec 15, 2009 +1
I saw a sponsored link a week or two ago with some serious NSFW content on the thumbnail and it wasn't flagged NSFW. The option would still be very helpful to have but I'm way too concerned people will submit NSFW content without flagging it now, especially with all the "angry" Listnookors that apparently don't take breaks at work.
1
emc2rae Dec 15, 2009 +6
Maybe I'm the only one who wants this, but as long as things are able to be tagged NSFW, is there a way for me to just...not have them show up on my listnook page at all? I tried claiming to be under 18, but that just affects my ability to subscribe to certain listnooks.
6
Arkonnan Dec 15, 2009 +159
>About the little red "NSFW" that appears next to posts... I love it. It makes it easier to find p*** quickly without having to leave the front page.
159
luckytopher Dec 15, 2009 +38
Kinda like [NSFW](http://www.listnook.com/r/nsfw) ?
38
Clay_Pigeon Dec 15, 2009 +47
Except /r/NSFW isn't supposed to be just p***. It was supposed to be weird NSFW stuff. There are and have been p*** sublistnooks forever. Oh well. More p*** is good too.
47
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +18
[deleted]
18
dorel Dec 15, 2009 +6
p*** >> weird except if you like weird p*** whatever that is
6
dicey Dec 15, 2009 +9
Thank you! I ended up turning off the 18+ setting on [/r/drunk](http://listnook.com/r/drunk) because it ticked me off so much.
9
db2 Dec 15, 2009 +7
So what you're saying is you're an angry drunk.
7
eerock Dec 15, 2009 +6
i don't know why sites don't make an easily accessible "At Work" / "Not At Work" toggle button. i wish StumbleUpon and Listnook both had this feature.
6
davelog Dec 15, 2009 +151
Any way you can make it blink?
151
lxe Dec 15, 2009 +30
Paste this in the address bar: javascript:void($('acronym').each(function(){$(this).css({'text-decoration':'blink'});})) **UPDATE:** Chrome-friendly version: javascript:void($('acronym').each(function(){var el=$(this);el.blink=function(){el.css({'visibility':el.css('visibility')!='hidden'?'hidden':'visible'});setTimeout(el.blink,500);};el.blink();}))
30
jrblast Dec 15, 2009 +1
Upvoted for the neat trick, even though it involves the blink tag.
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
[deleted]
3
lxe Dec 15, 2009 +3
javascript:void($('acronym').each(function(){$(this).wrap('');}))
3
jrblast Dec 16, 2009 +1
Ah, true, it uses CSS instead. Still, same effect, same problem.
1
Mattyi Dec 15, 2009 +17
It's been said here before but the only thing blinking should be used for is: > Schrodinger's cat is not dead.
17
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +580
Open and close your eyes real fast.
580
davelog Dec 15, 2009 +207
That did the trick! Upvoted!
207
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +80
Maybe we should make another announcement post about this.
80
jmkogut Dec 15, 2009 +78
RECENT REPORT: RALDI REVIVES , LISTNOOK REVOLTS
78
davelog Dec 15, 2009 +128
Relax, listnook's been revolting for years.
128
inthebackofyourhead Dec 15, 2009 +21
Thank you for the most fun line here in, well, minutes.
21
db2 Dec 15, 2009 +2
Like the peasants.
2
NSMike Dec 15, 2009 +2
No kidding, they stink on ice.
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +6
Firefox still supports Blink so ha!
6
fuckbuddy Dec 15, 2009 +9
That made everything blink, though.
9
raffters Dec 15, 2009 +2
Holy shit... its a make-your-own quantum physics problem!
2
xyroclast Dec 15, 2009 +1
tag, wave of the future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
eouhhohh Dec 15, 2009 +3
So when I get home how can I get rid of all the SFW posts?
3
roml Dec 15, 2009 +26
lol totally thought I had friended a listnookor named **NSFW**.
26
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +13
[deleted]
13
mndt Dec 15, 2009 +6
>added a preference to turn it off thank you but it is easier to find my favorite posts this way.
6
cinsere Dec 15, 2009 +3
Or if you enjoy lots of little red "NSFW" then please visit [/r/fuckbuddies](http://www.listnook.com/r/fuckbuddies)
3
surewhynot000 Dec 15, 2009 +4
I would also appreciate the option to change the color of the text. So one Listnookor could have the standard red and visible NSFW tag, and I could have an invisible green one.
4
ilikeyoureyes Dec 15, 2009 +44
can there be an option to just have it not be red?
44
sonicon Dec 15, 2009 +11
yeah I still want to know it's NSFW, but not have it be red
11
maniaq Dec 15, 2009 +5
orange?
5
JKoss Dec 15, 2009 +2
orangered?
2
mipadi Dec 15, 2009 +6
[This book](http://www.amazon.com/If-You-Give-Mouse-Cookie/dp/B00159UUZA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1260886777&sr=1-2) has all your answers.
6
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 -4
[deleted]
-4
pancakeradio Dec 15, 2009 +16
Hey, I thought your comment was below average.
16
Rhyono Dec 15, 2009 +5
His comment was below ilikeyoureyes' comment, not average's.
5
WoozleWuzzle Dec 15, 2009 +1
The people who downmodded me. He was at -4 when I made my response. I guess my comment and upmod to him had some kind of effect as he's now sitting at a comfortable 41.
1
alphabeat Dec 15, 2009 +1
You're going to have to settle with a Stylish extension or something.
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +6
I was misled, I only clicked this link because it was labeled NSFW. There is no NSFW material here, only lies.
6
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +12
I like it. It's like a big, shiny red button that says "click me. Here are boobies"
12
Sparke28 Dec 15, 2009 +4
Literally 5 seconds after I read "makes your eyes bleed", water from my cup swished up into my eye. It burned.
4
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
why not add an option to set nsfw manually rather than just pulling it out of the headline, so posts like this don't get flagged.
3
star_boy Dec 15, 2009 +11
Any way to leave it on but remove the redness?
11
Buzzard Dec 15, 2009 +12
Perhaps GM? // ==UserScript== // @name Listnook NSFW Tag Fixer-Upper // @namespace http://section99.net/ // @include http://www.listnook.com/ // @include http://listnook.com/ // ==/UserScript== // GM_addStyle('.link.over18 acronym { color: gray; font-weight: normal; }');
12
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
I noticed that there is a privacy option "make my votes public" What does that mean?
1
slydee Dec 15, 2009 +2
Can you make sure you didn't break it? I unclicked 'i am over eighteen years old and willing to view adult content' and I am still getting NSFW posts in bold red letters on the front page...
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
[deleted]
3
rabiddachshund Dec 15, 2009 +1
I like the fact that it's red (and a nice shade at that). Red generally signifies a warning, which it is. I think if it were any other color people would complain because it's not noticeable enough.
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
[deleted]
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
This announcement post was to announce the added feature of being able to turn the NSFW tag on or off.
3
dearsomething Dec 15, 2009 +3
I miss your signature.
3
funnynickname Dec 15, 2009 +7
How about a way to make it not red. It's the red that kills me.
7
KantLockeMeIn Dec 15, 2009 +4
But the red makes everyone realize that the mail icon color is orange and *not* red. Isn't that reason enough?
4
Ron_Santo Dec 15, 2009 +2
I'd like it there, just so long as it isn't bright red. Shouldn't there be a compromise option?
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +2
If the make safe(r) for work option is being used, why not surpress the nsfw links entirely?
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
[deleted]
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
I'd expect they'd still be marked as nsfw.. just when the option is also ticked to hide them entirely.
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
[deleted]
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
Seeing the NSFW makes me feel like I should get back to work.. it's unsettling :)
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
[deleted]
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
Yes, that's my excuse.. like the Greeks with the Oympics and the suggestion that doing work last minute is best; not having to deal with a run of perpetual change.
1
robotsongs Dec 15, 2009 +2
Thank you thank you thank you. I appreciate listnook's responsiveness in user matters.
2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +4
[removed]
4
syn-abounds Dec 15, 2009 +4
[That is Perfection.](http://myprops.org/viewimage/?i=1219201_1219300/4zXfO9rE&n=1&g=/adultcontent/Great-t***-and-ass-compilation/&c=/adultchannels/Handpicked-Adult-Pictures/) NSFW OBVIOUSLY.
4
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
Very nice, I hope more people see that. Submit it on it's own.
1
SirChasm Dec 15, 2009 +1
Could we have more options regarding NSFW content? I'm just not sure the current customization options adequately protect those of us at work who have co-workers constantly watching over our shoulder as we're browsing listnook.
1
kloo2yoo Dec 15, 2009 +3
Who / what determines whether the NSFW flag is set? I've made submissions and haven't noticed a nsfw checkbox.
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
Is checks if NSFW is in the text of the title and, if so, puts the red thing there too with css hackery.
3
kloo2yoo Dec 15, 2009 +1
Actually, I can't find the post now, but I came across one this morning that had a red tag on it, but was not nsfw and the magic letters weren't in the headline.
1
caleb555 Dec 15, 2009 +3
If it's in a NSFW sublistnook it will be marked as NSFW.
3
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +3
I don't believe you.
3
acmecorps Dec 15, 2009 +1
And, if I'm not mistaken, it also tags the posts from sublistnooks that set themselves as NSFW.
1
smeenz Dec 15, 2009 +1
Who even thought that a bold red tag saying NSFW would be a good idea has never had a manager shoulder surfing their session. A better idea would have been to display the story in a pale grey on white or something so that their eye is not drawn automatically to the only bold red tags on the page.
1
dagny_as Dec 15, 2009 +8
Great idea
8
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
1. Turn off thumbnails 2. Don't add 18+ to My Listnooks 3. B**** at people who post NSFW stuff without NSFW flag 4. WIN But uh.. thanks :) Not sure what poop does, but I'm hoping you didn't flag every post that has poop in the comments.
1
Mitsuho Dec 15, 2009 +3
Yeah right, like I'm clicking this link at work.
3
the_argus Dec 15, 2009 +1
>i am over eighteen years old and willing to view adult content (required to view some listnooks) - yes >make safe(r) for work. - no thanks >label posts that are not safe for work (NSFW) - nope So, where are the b****.
1
gerundronaut Dec 15, 2009 +1
Is there a way I can mark my comments as NSFW? The preference "i be over eighteen years old, an' be willing t' view adult content (be required t' view some listnooks)" should then apply.
1
samsu3 Dec 15, 2009 +2
that is a welcome change
2
factorV Dec 15, 2009 +1
remember, I am saying with all due respect, but that feature ain't worth a velvet painting of a whale and a dolphin gettin it on.
1
db2 Dec 15, 2009 +1
I couldn't click this link and read your announcement that I can turn off the NSFW tag because this post is NSFW.
1
TheDude06 Dec 15, 2009 +1
thanks! it doesnt seem like that big of a deal, but i quite enjoy having a blurless line between all content
1
S2S2S2S2S2 Dec 15, 2009 +8
Thank you!
8
lucasvb Dec 15, 2009
This reminds me, why is it that when I'm at work, the top posts of the hour are full of p***, with thumbnails and everything, even if they are marked as NSFW, or are from NSWF sublistnooks, and even if I disable adult content on my preferences? Why doesn't any of it work?
0
raldi Dec 15, 2009 +5
That seems odd. Can you post the relevant sections of your prefs?
5
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
I thought I had developed really lame super powers. The ability to see little nsfws in red. Damn.
1
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +1
Thank you listnook. I now feel safe to use your site.
1
Nothing2DoWithPost Dec 15, 2009 +1
I like scrambled eggs best this week. Last week I liked fried better.
1
dopameme Dec 15, 2009 +1
yowza, now i can find them immediately.
1
mabelfoo Dec 15, 2009 +1
What the cuss are you talking about??
1
maniaq Dec 15, 2009
looks kinda orange...
0
ChickenCroquet Dec 15, 2009
I appreciate this. New features are fine for those that love them but the ability to NOT 'upgrade' is great for those who like listnook just the way it is!
0
yolkstalk Dec 15, 2009 -2
that is great. I clicked on a link before and i came up in a p*** video having say WTF? lol... this is not nice if there are other people in the room
-2
[deleted] Dec 15, 2009 +7
I'm not sure if you said WTF before you came or if you accidentally ended up in a p*** video, but hey, here's an upvote.
7
yolkstalk Dec 15, 2009
oh sorry I write so fast sometimes, bad habbit. I clicked on a link but i didn't know whether that goes to a p***, or a its was a catchy title to a funny vid. or parody ha ha , well, it wasn't, it was pretty raw, and she was screaming and my girl said "what is that" haha
0
zoomacrymosby Dec 15, 2009 +2
Have you ever heard of complete sentences?
2
← Back to Board