AfD leader demands the US withdraw troops from Germany

Though people posting here who may or may not even be in the United States aren't doing it as official representatives of a political party and are not privy to asking for national security information. [https://eutoday.net/afd-used-parliamentary-tools-to-seek-sensitive-data](https://eutoday.net/afd-used-parliamentary-tools-to-seek-sensitive-data) If a US politician started choosing Iran, China or Russia over their own intelligence community or hoarding classified information, that could possibly be a red flag that might warrant an investigation. But as you indicate, they might get away with it too.

What war plans? All the experts said this was going to be a disaster and trump decided to do it anyway to distract from the Epstein files. But I guess trump knows better than all the generals like he always says. Is he still negotiating with imaginary Iranian leaders?

Sadly, it doesn't seem like you folks have an easy solution to all that.

that’s because we have freedoms. and a free press. and “our enemies” are an actual country full of other human beings that we’re currently trying to ”bomb back to the stone age” so our pedo protector can keep his epstein files out of the news.

Trump has the attention spawn of a fly, he's not the one they're banking on. It's the likes of Vance and Miller who are leading the support for the European far right, and they'll continue to do so. Yeah sure it's a game of optics, but again, the AfD gets support from *Russia* too - everyone knows it, but it's impossible to prove conclusively because the AfD themselves don't even need to be doing much, and their voters don't care. It'll continue to be just the same with the US, except they'll be taking money rather than endorsements from now on.

It’s true that the report concluded that there was an effort by Russia to influence the 2016 election. It did not however, find that anyone in the campaign personally conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts. Why wasn’t the investigation opened again by the last admin? It’s because there is nothing.

All of it's true. There's no "alternative facts". That doesn't exist. And it all depends on the US interests. NATO's membership isn't all about seving U.S interests. It's about a defensive pact that serves all members interests. There was a perfectly good deal with Iran where there was oversight into the enriched Uranium Iran could and were allowed to have. Which was good for the whole of NATO. Trump tore that deal up single handedly. Then the US and Israel (or must I say Trump amd Nethanyahu) decided, without consulting allies to f*** the whole middle east again. Pressuring and insulting allies when confronted with their own f*** ups. First threathening to withdraw all US bases in the EU and using it as pressure tactics along with tariffs on allied members and invading an allied territory. And now insisting to use the bases and territory you wanted to abandon in the first place to be used to draw allies into a foreign war of your own making. And now I won't even go into detail about the whole Russia/Ukraine debacle, where Trump is siding with Putin because Zelenskyy didn't want to fabricate lies about Biden/Burisma. Where in this whole story since Trump took office in 2016 was there any sign of working together on the NATO allience from the side of US. Trump made it clear he wanted out of NATO and f*** europe over way before he even was president. NATO is open to defensive support to NATO allies, (and even more nations) it isn't a get out of jail free card for maniac despots. It's gonna take a long time before relations are normalised again, and I don't think it's gonna happen under Trump. So tl;dr : No, NATO is not there to "consistently serve US interest" because it never was meant for it and maybe never will be again. Why don't you try asking the newly formed "Board of peace" if they are willing to clean up this mess?.