· 142 comments · Save ·
Questions & Help Mar 14, 2026 at 10:36 PM

Another 3 members of Iran’s women’s soccer team decide against staying in Australia as refugees

Posted by RolePsychological890


https://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/iran-women-soccer-three-more-return-9.7129171

🚩 Report this post

142 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
jigsaw153 Mar 15, 2026 +405
Once they saw the house prices it was over.....
405
FreakyBugEyedWeirdo Mar 16, 2026 +10
That and the spiders.
10
Redditor-K Mar 17, 2026 +1
That and they threatened their families.
1
justjoshingu Mar 15, 2026 +112
One of my friends that fled the fall when she was 12 has family over there and they keep losing land, people have been tortured and lost for months at a time and general actual dictatorship type social things and she said its because theres always someone you care about back home. This was a conversation in 2015
112
theantig Mar 15, 2026 +15
It’s a tough choice yourself versus your family…
15
chromedgnome Mar 15, 2026 +14
When it comes to personal safety, I would hope every member of my family would chose to leave a dangerous situation even If it means I don't. It would be a hard choice to leave though, absolutely.
14
MarsRocks97 Mar 16, 2026 +3
The problem is someone leaving puts the people behind in a more dangerous situation.
3
princemousey1 Mar 16, 2026 +2
Even if it means torture for you, as the relative?
2
millerlit Mar 15, 2026 +289
They probably have family in Iran that is being threatened.
289
[deleted] Mar 15, 2026 +16
[removed]
16
stomacake Mar 16, 2026 +3
What a stupid insane take. I'm Chinese and I talk shit about the CCP all the time. My family isn't going to be held hostage in China just because I'm talking shit. There will be problems if I become a politician in America. But normal citizens aren't just going to become "spies".
3
xande2545 Mar 15, 2026 -260
Threatened?? you mean more than the bombs trump and israel are dropping??
-260
I_SEE_GAY_PEOPLE Mar 15, 2026 +163
Are you so daft that you don't think the Iranian regime would threaten or kill innocent civilians? Just because Trump and Israel suck donkey balls, that doesn't make the Iranian regime good guys
163
TheBigMotherFook Mar 15, 2026 +32
Yeah really. The Iranian regime gunned down tens of thousands of civilians for protesting against the government. Trump is nowhere near that level.
32
Azznorfinal Mar 15, 2026 -51
If you don't think trump would have everyone who doesn't kiss his ass killed if he could get away with it and smile while doing it, you haven't been paying attention.
-51
johnk419 Mar 15, 2026 +49
It's amazing how even when explicitly explained to you you still don't f****** get it. We all know Trump is a corrupt douchenozzle, but him being a douchenozzle is not mutually exclusive to the Iran regime also being a cruel dictatorship. Can we have one f****** conversation without one of you idiots jumping in and parroting "but Trump"?
49
melisadhoc Mar 16, 2026 -4
Why would you excuse Trump? Your logical despite trying to be convincing with swearing don't make any sense. What do you know about the Iranian leadership.or the Iranian country? Are the ayatollahs great to their people? No. Does that give America the right to invade them and decide who will rule the country? Hell no. Do they have a right to defend themselves in their own land against greedy invaders trying to steal their resources, identity and culture? I'm assuming you are an American. Your country is 250 years old. Iran is 3000 years old. Given the turmoil America and Israel has created trougout mena for almost 100 years and especially in Iran it's completely understandable they don't want the American dream. Trough a coup via CIA America overthrew a democratically elected leader and placed an American puppet that was as bad if not worse as the ayatollahs. Why are you not ashamed even for your vile defense of American values??
-4
johnk419 Mar 16, 2026 +3
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit is it?
3
melisadhoc Mar 17, 2026 -1
Weak people like you will make personal attacks to deflect focus. My English is better than your Swedish, Arabic and Chinese little American man. You always pretend to be Bruce Willis in Die Hard when you are in a discussions? Hows that working out for you? You are Vilifying The Iranian leadership in order to excuse a Ginger psycho that is paid to invade a soverign nation and you dont want to discuss that but instead focus on the dictatorship of Iran. What does that tell me about you? Either you are an Israeli Hasbara bot or you really are a propaganda lobotomized human.
-1
johnk419 Mar 17, 2026
Are you on drugs? Quote me where in my comment I supported Trump or this war against Iran. You can't, because I didn't. In fact I did the opposite, I called Trump a corrupt douchenozzle. You're going off on this insane tirade based on some hallucinated comments you "read". Don't do drugs.
0
LCAshin Mar 15, 2026 +4
It’s fascinating to me that a % of the population actually has these thoughts and beliefs. I’d love to see a study on your brain
4
Then-Volume6098 Mar 16, 2026 -9
still waiting on a source for this claim. doesn't it bother you?
-9
mangabalanga Mar 15, 2026 +68
Look everyone, it’s someone simping for the Islamic Republic by whatabouting their very well documented threats against dissenters and their families! Tell us, what is it like to be so brave?
68
Hour-Passenger-8513 Mar 15, 2026 +18
These women are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Let's put it like that. Iran regime suppression bad. US/Israel bombing civilians also bad.
18
secret_squirrels_nut Mar 15, 2026 +15
the real sad part is iran will probably kill them and their family even after they extort them back to iran.
15
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
But in regards to the question, the reason they are going back is likely because their families are being threatened. >A member of the Iranian-Australian diaspora, who asked not to be named, said reports out of Iran suggested members of the team staff had been relaying messages from the Iranian government to the players who’d chosen to stay in Australia. >“They also reported that their families were threatened and even some voice messages by their families were played for the football players to convince them to go back,” the diaspora member said. Source: *The Guardian* Unsubstantiated of course. But not at all out of line with what the regime does and has been known to do.
1
melisadhoc Mar 16, 2026 +1
You are clearly living the American dream of swallowing blue pills and listening to your reassuring propagandist media. This could be true but it could also be propaganda just like the lies being spread by fbi and a bunch of security services in West that Iran is seeking to commit terror attacks in the west. Yet they can't prove Iran has ever done any attacks outside of mena.
1
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
Propaganda by who? The Guardian? >Yet they can't prove Iran has ever done any attacks outside of mena. Seriously? >Carlisle Rivera, a man who prosecutors say was hired by Iranian operative Farhad Shakeri as part of a murder-for-hire plot to assassinate Iranian dissident Masih Alinejad, was sentenced to 15 years in prison on Wednesday. >Alinejad has survived three plots by the regime to kill or kidnap her. She confronted Rivera at his sentencing in federal court in Manhattan. Who's: "swallowing blue pills and listening to your reassuring propagandist media" again? Every accusation, a confession.
1
jimmy_three_shoes Mar 15, 2026 +4
Dude got his account banned. Bot maybe?
4
GooseyDuckDuck Mar 15, 2026 +6
Yes, you absolute moron. No one is disputing the immorality of Trumps actions but the Iranian leadership killed 10’s of thousands for protesting - so threatening family members is nothing to them.
6
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
These people man. I really wonder what their news feed looks like that leads them to believe that the regime isn't, or wouldn't, threaten them.
1
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
>A member of the Iranian-Australian diaspora, who asked not to be named, said reports out of Iran suggested members of the team staff had been relaying messages from the Iranian government to the players who’d chosen to stay in Australia. >“They also reported that their families were threatened and even some voice messages by their families were played for the football players to convince them to go back,” the diaspora member said. Source: *Captain of Iranian women's football team leaves Australia after initially accepting offer of asylum - The Guardian*
1
Classic_Low933 Mar 15, 2026 -1
Go touch grass kid
-1
tooshpright Mar 15, 2026 +36
How will any of them get back to Iran? I did not think there would be planes.
36
Draano Mar 15, 2026 +8
Maybe they could present themselves to the embassy for repatriation.
8
Rare_Trouble_4630 Mar 15, 2026 +65
Most likely, their families were threatened. Unfortunately, this sort of coercion is routine autocratic regime behavior; you are almost guaranteed to find it in any regime you can think of.
65
Nono6768 Mar 14, 2026 +158
I too would stay if my home countries government threatened my family with harassment and torture
158
KohlsCashOfficial Mar 15, 2026 +13
Do you mean go back?
13
Ethereal_Nutsack Mar 16, 2026 +9
No he would stay. He hates his family
9
nocoolN4M3sleft Mar 15, 2026 +17
But they’re not staying in Australia? The headline basically says they’re returning to Iran, not staying in Australia.
17
RavensQueen502 Mar 15, 2026 +5
Or if your family is in a war zone and might not survive.  Iran doesn't even have to threaten much at this point, Hegseth and Trump are doing it for them.  'The only ones who need to worry are the IRANIANS who think they're going to live '.
5
Brushies10-4 Mar 15, 2026 +4
Iran gets to be so passive they have to put out statements they’ll kill anyone remotely questionable and have check points. 
4
iamwelly Mar 15, 2026 +50
This is so sad. That regime kills women for less than they’ve already done. If their families are being threatened lest they return they are almost still certainly returning to prison or death.
50
GardenPeep Mar 15, 2026 +61
Sounds like Iranian agents have been working on them, maybe making threats or misleading promises.
61
vbnc112 Mar 15, 2026 +38
Going back won’t save them or their families at this point, regardless of what they’ve been told.
38
mister_potato_butt Mar 16, 2026 +3
Rock + hard place eh. But you'd think even the IRGC would leave their families alone if they came back to face punishment, because the only way they can keep using that leverage over people is if they follow through. If they just tortured and killed everyone and their families, even after those fleeing agreed to return, they would soon find their threats would not coerce anyone back in future.
3
TropicalBonerstorm Mar 15, 2026 -48
I mean it's total speculation either way, but I don't think the IRGC wants the bad press that could come from someone with access to the western media calling them out. In other words the refugees have leverage as well.
-48
Fanfics Mar 15, 2026 +25
>with access to the western media bruh months after the mass protests and we still have barely any info about what went down. Western media access to people in Iran is basically nonexistent right now.
25
mister_potato_butt Mar 16, 2026 +1
Time to drop leaflets from reaper drones lol, like back in WW2
1
TropicalBonerstorm Mar 15, 2026 -14
That's my whole point... The athletes taking refuge in Australia would have media access.
-14
GardenPeep Mar 15, 2026 +2
But the ones who go back will just disappear.
2
squidgytree Mar 15, 2026 +14
If they don't go back, the regime will just hang their entire families instead
14
lhommetrouble Mar 15, 2026 -15
LMAO the insane mossad propaganda here. Show us where Iran every hung someone’s family because they decided to apply for asylum in another country
-15
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +7
So Irans lesdership saying they'll kill them isn't proof but mossad propaganda? You bots sure are stupid
7
lhommetrouble Mar 15, 2026 -6
Okay show us then. Where did Iran’s leadership say they will kill people’s families for seeking asylum.
-6
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +7
The fact you guys don't think Iran won't kill them is hilarious. They've murdered 30,000 protesters, shut off the internet to kill them.
7
lhommetrouble Mar 15, 2026 -8
No they haven’t murdered 30,000 protesters. The internet is shut off because Israel & the US are using it for cyberattacks and spreading disinfo. We remember the Stuxnet attack on Iranian nuclear power plants. You might be a bit stupid but don’t assume I am. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet
-8
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +9
Yes they did BBC Iran's supreme leader acknowledges thousands killed during recent protests Jan 17, 2026
9
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +7
They shut it off in January lol or are you gonna ignore the protests of January that saw 30k protestors shot dead by the Iranian Government?
7
RogueCoon Mar 16, 2026 +3
Bad bot
3
lhommetrouble Mar 16, 2026
Saying something against your narrative = bot
0
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +4
https://www.iranintl.com/en/202603145682
4
lhommetrouble Mar 15, 2026 -5
Guy links an Iranian dissident outlet that supports the CIA puppet Shah as proof. Nothing in this says they’re going to kill people’s families for seeing asylum. You people are something else.
-5
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +4
They literally do. Read the wording or sre you incapable of doing that?
4
TheETERNAL20 Mar 15, 2026 +3
IRGC Bot lover.
3
MaygarRodub Mar 14, 2026 +26
I'm sure that'll work out well for them.
26
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 14, 2026 +68
Tbf if my family were in a war zone I’d want to get to them asap.
68
xxc6h1206xx Mar 15, 2026 +13
Your family would not want you there. They’d want you safe. “Yes, come back so you can die” is not what love should look like. If one of my loved ones escaped war I’d be happy for them.
13
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 15, 2026 +1
Yea, of course I won’t want them to come back. But I still will. Maybe it’s selfish or stupid but I’ll still do it.
1
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
I'm not so sure it's about that. The conflict started well before they decided to seek asylum in Australia. And they made their decision to seek asylum after they finished their last game and were planning on going back home. What's more likely, is like how one player reported some of their family members were detained afterwards, the rest were also possibly received threats on their families as well.
1
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 16, 2026 +1
Iran: fighting the strongest military in the world, while having old equipment (due to the US sanctions). As well as fighting Israel Why the fk will they be so eager to get those women back? Explain the logic and thought process
1
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
Sure. Before the final Iranian women's soccer game. They women's team players refused to sing the national anthem out loud during the pre-game ceremony, which the regime labeled as traitorous, especially during times of war. And said that there would be severe punishments for their actions. >On March 2, 2026, the Iranian women's national football team remained silent during their national anthem at the AFC Women's Asian Cup in Australia- a move widely interpreted as a protest agains the Iranian regime amid regional conflict. Following the act, Iranian state media branded the players "wartime traitors". The women's team chose not to do that because it was a sign of protest against the regimes brutal crackdown that was still ongoing even into the war (and to this day)- that saw *at-least* 7,000 people killed and other estimates putting the total death toll around 30,000+ people killed in early January. After being labeled as traitors, several of the women on the team were able to escape the hotel they were staying in (that was under supervision by the teams handlers) and then sought asylum from the Australian government. But now reports suggest many of them are changing their minds, after reported threats to some of the team members have been going around, and arrests made of their relatives. The reason the regime wants the women's team back is two-fold: 1) They were supposed to return to Iran after the end of the AFC cup. 2) The regime doesn't want people inside Iran being able to speak to the outside world right now. FYI: Iran still has it's January internet blackout in place (where they took the internet offline and severely restricted access), monitoring dissenters and people within the population who were part of the protests, or might go back to them again. International athletes going abroad, seeking asylum, and possibly speaking out against their government would be a very bad look for the regime, and might foment more unrest. So they want to as much as they can control what goes out, just like how they are doing so with the internet and people at home. And women, especially who are seemingly disobeying the regimes orders break that control and is a liability.
1
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 16, 2026 +1
Fair enough, you are right
1
MaygarRodub Mar 15, 2026 -3
That's a very good point. I actually hadn't considered that, somehow.
-3
LilyBelle504 Mar 16, 2026 +1
That is not a good point. Nor likely the reason why. What's more likely, is like how one of the members already was threatened and had some of their family members detained by the regime... Any of the other women who decided to seek asylum, but then suddenly changed their minds, probably also received threats. The regime does not want Iranians escaping the country and speaking out against them right now.
1
NekoCatSidhe Mar 15, 2026 -8
That’s probably the main reason. But I have also read that anti-regime Iranians have been souring on that war quite quickly now that it is clear that the US and Israel are also targeting civilian infrastructure. And while I have no idea how Iran will actually treat them once they actually come back to their country, the only one who actually threatened them was some state TV presenter, which hardly makes it official government policy. The Iranian government probably has bigger fishes to fry right now. With all that has been going on, it also makes me wonder how much pressure the Australian government put on them to ask for asylum in the first place, if they changed their mind that fast afterwards.
-8
PoodleNoodlePie Mar 15, 2026 -9
To achieve what exactly, death together? ( I have family that have chosen to stay in an unstable country - zero chance im going back when the civil war starts)
-9
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 15, 2026 +10
I find it very weird how some societies became so individualistic, not only are we social creatures, but your family took care of u for years and years, paid a lot of money to see you grow, u can’t turn ur back on them. I don’t care if they make the right call or the wrong one, I’ll go help them either way. And I strongly believe that this should be the case for everyone. And that’s only the family part. I’ll also go back to protect my country, my neighborhood, my home, my memories. If it gets destroyed what do I have left?
10
zzazzzz Mar 15, 2026 +5
your life? do you really think your parents would want you to come back just to die after all that they did for you to grow up? really? i sure as shit wouldnt want mykids anywhere near.
5
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 15, 2026 -1
That’s true, I also wouldn’t want my kids anywhere near. But I can’t let my parents stay in a war zone, also death isn’t guaranteed, so I have to do something to help them get away. Or if they insist on staying, we just need to find a good spot.
-1
zzazzzz Mar 15, 2026 +5
question is do you really need to be there physically to help them get out? but in the end everyone has to decide for temselfs what risks they want to take obviously. but il be honest i dont think there is any "good spot" in a war.
5
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 15, 2026
I don’t really care. I just can’t imagine seeing them in a war zone then waking up to go to work or make breakfast
0
WindowLicker_Pro Mar 15, 2026 +1
The families of soldiers do this every single day, and they're not allowed to follow them into a war zone. If you wouldn't want your children to do it, why would you disrespect all of your parent's hard work raising you just to die trying to get them out, and leave your child without a parent? It might feel selfish to stay safe, but it's the opposite. 
1
PoodleNoodlePie Mar 15, 2026 -2
The family you built in your new home with the people who accepted you into to their society.
-2
Ok_Climate8599 Mar 15, 2026 +1
Ngl I’m interested in ur reasons. Would u be kind enough to explain the thought process?
1
[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 +69
[removed]
69
RobboCoppo1 Mar 14, 2026 +25
Or it's just people summing up their options in an incredibly complicated situation and making a difficult decision...
25
[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 -1
[removed]
-1
mido_sama Mar 14, 2026 +2
Yea F IRGC.
2
11Crt11 Mar 14, 2026 -21
Not as much as the Zionist Israel and imperialist USA
-21
[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 +3
[removed]
3
Zestyclose-Track5877 Mar 14, 2026
Well tbf I agree with the poster despite my family having suffered greatly under this brutal Iranian regime, the illegal war by the Epstein regime that has already displaced over 3 million people in Iran, I never thought I’d day this but I am 100% cheering on the mullahs. F*** the Epstein regime! Also let’s not forget the U.S. president rapes children!
0
BillionTonsHyperbole Mar 14, 2026 +4
Equivocation of screwup democracies with a straight up batshit death cult is not a good look.
4
IntriguedPsycho2 Mar 14, 2026 +4
Surely that was anticipated though?? Now they are earmarked for suspected deserters. Feels like a refrain of the Wagner leader’s coup attempt and backing out halfway
4
PolicyWonka Mar 14, 2026
They applied for asylum because the United States started bombing their country…they did not apply for asylum because of Iranian leadership.
0
wodat234 Mar 14, 2026 -1
Why else do you think you don't see any defections from China or North Korea at major sporting events? China has a like hundreds of athletes participate in the Olympics and other major events, but you don't ever see anybody defections. And everybody knows that China is an authoritarian country where people have no rights. Anyone who have the chance to escape, will never turn back, unless their family is being held hostage.
-1
Nono6768 Mar 14, 2026 +5
It’s also that in communist countries the party sets successful athletes really good for life.
5
wodat234 Mar 14, 2026 -2
But we don't see those athletes that lose, attempt to defect, do we? There are plenty of Chinese athletes that do not win any medals. So the only conclusion one can draw, is that the China is holding their families hostage. Otherwise, what other reason can there be for so few Chinese defectors for asylum?
-2
ScriptKiddo69 Mar 14, 2026 +1
Maybe they want to live in china?
1
wodat234 Mar 14, 2026
China is an authoritarian hellhole. Nobody person wants to live there. Stop promoting pro-China propaganda and talking points.
0
DroppedAxes Mar 15, 2026 +8
I'm extremely critical of china for many reasons but pretending ypu can't have a good life in china and want to live there is so insane.
8
NamerNotLiteral Mar 15, 2026
Before anyone else wants to respond to this sheer ignorance, just remember this guy's a delusional troll. One look at his profile should make it clear. Just ignore and downvote him until he goes back to his little safe space.
0
wodat234 Mar 15, 2026 +1
So why don't you explain why there are no defections from Chinese athletes?
1
drinkduffdry Mar 14, 2026 +1
No probably about it.
1
Kitchen_Society2618 Mar 15, 2026 +8
Just my opinion, but I believe they've already been told what will happen to their families there if they don't return. Correct me if I'm wrong, cause I sometimes am!
8
BackgroundPass1355 Mar 15, 2026 +5
You're right, this is Islamic Republic textbook play.
5
haiduy2011 Mar 15, 2026 +10
Why is everyone assuming these women don’t want to go back to Iran? edit: a lot of people who have never interacted with refugees are in the comments
10
DoeCommaJohn Mar 15, 2026 +74
Because they filed for refugee status. It would be weird for them to go through all the effort of filing for refugee status, probably ruining their reputation at home, and then just change their mind on a whim. Clearly *something* happened, and that *something* must be pretty significant
74
haiduy2011 Mar 15, 2026 -45
Wanting to go home is a pretty significant feeling.
-45
CanadianPanda76 Mar 15, 2026 +39
Filing for refugee status isn't something that one does on a whim, especially when your literally representing your country on a international stage.
39
haiduy2011 Mar 15, 2026 -32
and people who are granted asylum sometimes get buyer's remorse at their destination. They were about to go from representing their country and had futures to suddenly have to live and fend for themselves in a country they don't really understand yet.
-32
Structure5city Mar 15, 2026 +22
A country where they could choose to live how they wanted, free from a repressive theocratic regime. You act like there is no appeal to staying in Australia. 
22
CanadianPanda76 Mar 15, 2026 +11
The country they represented but also didn't sing the national anthem at a match? Yeah I doubt buyers remorse.
11
haiduy2011 Mar 15, 2026 -3
Plenty of refugees have buyer’s remorse. You can ask Ukrainians.
-3
CanadianPanda76 Mar 15, 2026 +2
Ukrainians actually live here not show up for a one time event. And they aren't going back when there's a war. And its not buyers remorse if they come here are unhappy but can't go back home. Unhappy about an unideal situation isn't buyers remorse. And I dont get why you assume they'll be treated so well if they go back? They don't look like they're gonna even rank top 3. Especially considering this reaction back home. >The Iranian squad had arrived in Australia to compete in the Women’s Asian Cup, where the team refused to sing the national anthem during their opening match. >The gesture triggered fury in Tehran, as one state broadcasting presenter labelled the players traitors and warned they would be “dealt with” severely.
2
KohlsCashOfficial Mar 15, 2026 +40
They didn’t sing the national anthem until they were forced, they were photographed without a veil with a man, they looked into refugee status in Australia. They are 100% being threatened to return home and it is not going to be good for them when they get there
40
CanadianPanda76 Mar 15, 2026 +14
Yeahs its not a giant leap to say they were not happy in Iran.
14
haiduy2011 Mar 15, 2026 -19
This is a weird patronizing stance to take. It’s like you wish for them to be repressed so you can look like saviors. They’re human beings with capacity to weigh risks and situations.
-19
KohlsCashOfficial Mar 15, 2026 +22
Patronizing? You can’t be serious. They’re in an impossible situation right now.
22
hollyjazzy Mar 15, 2026 +4
No, it’s being worried about how they were coerced into going back, and what their situation will be like back in Iran.
4
sluglife1987 Mar 15, 2026 +9
Well the originally ran away and tried to claim asylum then they changed their mind. Sounds like they were threatened or coerced into changing their mind.
9
WindowLicker_Pro Mar 15, 2026 +2
Idk, maybe look into how countries like Iran actually treat their women, and then you can try to tell me you're cool with being treated as a second class citizen. 
2
ionosoydavidwozniak Mar 15, 2026 -31
Because Iran bad, west good
-31
iamwelly Mar 15, 2026 +21
More like “West not currently great, Iran murders women for looking the wrong way”
21
Arno_Dorian_11 Mar 15, 2026 -15
West bombs elementary schools yes
-15
iamwelly Mar 15, 2026 +19
Hey, you know, it’s completely possible to disagree with both the rationale and methods used by the US and Israel (which are horrific and evil) without simping for the similarly evil Iranian regime.  The Iranian people are by all accounts wonderful, but their country is run by fascist religious zealots who have put more women to death in the last decade than anyone else on the planet. And the ones they don’t put to death have very little rights. This isn’t a “both sides” argument; but people here are very clearly acting like these poor women are afraid to go back simply because there’s military action going on. I would bet that being bombed by the US or Israel is the lowest fear they have at this moment versus returning to a regime they publicly repudiated - who will punish them very severely upon return for daring to try and escape that life.
19
TikvahT Mar 15, 2026 +12
Thank you for expressing that so accurately and well in the face of stubborn ignorance.
12
CanadianPanda76 Mar 15, 2026
And that means its not a great place to be a woman? And it was an Iranian group that pushed the Australian government to offer the asylum. Not all Iranians are in Iran.
0
hipi_hapa Mar 15, 2026 -9
Because their governments and press have been telling them for decades that Iran is evil
-9
r3dditr0x Mar 15, 2026 +4
Must've seen the spiders?
4
yzerman88 Mar 15, 2026 -1
Decision was made after trying Vegemite
-1
LoserBroadside Mar 16, 2026 +2
“Decide.” They were told their families would be killed if they didn’t return. They didn’t “decide” shit. 
2
sinpajaroazul Mar 15, 2026 +1
Most likely they misjudged and thought the government would go down quick
1
[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 -16
[deleted]
-16
SaltyRedditTears Mar 15, 2026 +11
/r/iamverybadass
11
RedTulkas Mar 15, 2026 +8
The IRGC might take the PR win and explain there reluctance with "being seduced by westerners but overcoming it" Or they just went old school and threatened their families But one can hope
8
[deleted] Mar 14, 2026 -15
[deleted]
-15
Nono6768 Mar 14, 2026 +6
Does this Eastern power have to be a radical Islamist oppressive regime tho?
6
11Crt11 Mar 14, 2026 -4
Better than western pedophiliac king backed war criminal led genocidal "democracy"
-4
Grand-Apartment-5944 Mar 15, 2026 -13
Aside from possible threats to their families, I think about the parts of Australian society that support the Iranian regime. I suspect they didn't see Australia as enough of a safe haven to make it worth abandoning their families.
-13
antman_greaseman Mar 15, 2026 -23
Even they think that Iran is better than Australia.
-23
JonathanJoestar336 Mar 15, 2026 +7
>Even they think that Iran is better than Australia. You cant be this dense
7
← Back to Board