Like ok
I fully understand it's the age of the cellphone and they have some ppl who doomscroll while watching tv.
But almost EVERY show barring a few extreme exceptions on cable
Seems to have a moment about 35 minutes to 38 minutes into the run time.
Where all the characters have to stand around and explain Everything that's happened lest the viewer forget or not understan like they have to hand hold the viewer to the conclusion and even then it will be a stupid problem that would of been solved with a simple solution.
Or a plot device that will be mentioned later has to be shown, or discussed dozens of times.
It's like they think people are too stupid to follow a plot point or something these days
Viewers are their own worst enemy.
People b**** about the quality of tv these days, but then won't give anything actually intelligent a chance they just rather watch some stupid shit like laws of attraction or big bang
> It's like they think people are too stupid to follow a plot point or something these days
they very often are.
752
Pale_Fire21Mar 27, 2026
+70
I remember reading somewhere that a lot of TV shows are directed now with the belief the viewer will be spending a lot of if not the majority of their time staring at their phone and will need things reexplained multiple times.
70
MrchristopherrrMar 27, 2026
+63
I feel like it’s a self fulfilling prophecy because half the time if the show I’m watching is going over stuff that I already know I’m much more likely to pick up my phone, then I end up missing new information, which then means I need to pay attention when they review the information again.
63
spudmarsupialMar 27, 2026
+34
Not to mention BOOM BOOM mumblemumble CRASH YAYAYA mumble
34
IndigocellMar 27, 2026
+14
Netflix shows all seem to be mixed that way. Characters talking quiet, I turn the volume up. F****** LOUD MUSICAL MONTAGE SCENE! Turn the volume down. Characters talking quiet again...
14
ButtPlugForPMMar 27, 2026
+4
Their HDR mixing is shit too.
everything is overly dark for no reason.
even if u play it on a 4400nit refrence monitor and the scenes outdoors in the sun it looks like it's sunset.
4
PhilipJFriesMar 27, 2026
+12
In my house, volume is at medium-low levels and subtitles on. The crashes are at a reasonable volume and I just read the dialogue.
One benefit is it's lead me to watch more foreign language films/shows because the language spoken doesn't matter when you can't make out what they're saying.
12
ButtPlugForPMMar 27, 2026
+226
yeah actually i retract my argument fully..
i forgot we elected a rapist
226
TalidelMar 27, 2026
+125
You see it all the time with people online arguing that people instant travel in old films because "2 days later" doesn't appear on the screen, despite anyone with a brain being able to tell from the context that time has passed.
125
Tyrone_Shoelaces_EsqMar 27, 2026
+64
I ran into this back in the 90s with someone insisting that Pulp Fiction involved time travel because the stories were told out of chronological sequence.
64
torino_neraMar 27, 2026
+19
I wonder if their head exploded when they saw Memento
19
brownsugarandsaltMar 27, 2026
+5
That narrative device gave me goosebumps (not sure how common it was/is, but Memento was the first time I'd seen it). So unexpected and hectic.
5
GabelvampirMar 27, 2026
+5
So this is what it's like watching Pulp Fiction with brain damage. I was about 12 when I first watched it and easily understood that.
5
ButtPlugForPMMar 27, 2026
+18
how about when camera has to have an establishing shot..of the outside of the characters home/apartment.
like we won't be able to tell from context clues they are now at home now..not the previous location.
or..
when a show/movie
is like
PARIS-FRANCE...then zooms in on the eiffel tower to REALLY ramp it home that this scen is in france and paris...i think just a shot of the eiffel tower would be enough here lol
18
lindendwellerMar 27, 2026
+31
Regarding establishing shots outside the home... Sometimes it's just showing the outside once in a while to prevent the story to feel claustrophobic with only middle shots and closeups.
31
ChaosmusicMar 27, 2026
+9
San Francisco show the Golden Gate Bridge
Seattle show the Space Needle.
NYC show the Twin Tow...Empire State Building.
9
cabalusMar 27, 2026
+5
Okay I'll push back on this one, while having text saying Paris AND showing the Eiffel tower is a bit patronising, establishing shots are very important
One of those things you don't know you need but really miss when they aren't there, even if you know the story!
Don't underestimate the effect on narrative legibility when you leave too much up to assumption.
You don't want your audience to lose the emotional throughline of the scene because their brain is busy figuring out where they are through context clues at the top of the scene
5
CountVanillulaMar 27, 2026
+2
I didn’t usually get the change of locale until they showed someone’s underpants.
2
bookantMar 27, 2026
+20
Hey now! That's not right.
We elected a *child* rapist. Trump rapes little girls.
20
StuffonBookshelfsMar 27, 2026
+9
And adult women too.
9
Schubert125Mar 27, 2026
+1
C'mon, be fair! It's also entirely possible he rapes little boys too. Trump rapes little children.
1
MattyzooksMar 27, 2026
+3
Go into any episode discussion thread posted in this sublistnook. There's usually multiple people complaining about bad writing who mention one their reasons as something that was actually explain in the show but they just weren't paying attention.
Yea, it sucks that Netflix thinks we're ALL idiots but every now and then you get a Dark.
3
UsernameChallengedMar 27, 2026
+11
I remember Netflix said for their own produced shows, they bake in the idea that most viewers will be on their phones, so that they need to repeat key points multiple times.
11
wkavinskyMar 27, 2026
+6
Think about the most averagely intelligent person you know.
Half the world are dumber than that.
6
breaker94Mar 27, 2026
+2
Yup, they. Not us listnookors. Never us
2
7kcitsMar 27, 2026
+2
Not me and this isn't exactly the same case but they definitely need to do that shit when some of these shows take years to release a new season. But in-between episodes? Yeah people are tiktok brained.
2
spudmarsupialMar 27, 2026
+2
They can do that with intro blurbs tailored to the episode like B5 and numerous other shows did. I wouldn't mind a nametag on a character's first appearence too, but that's because my mind doesn't do names and faces.
2
EphemeralEchidnaMar 27, 2026
+421
It's not that they think we're stupid, they literally design shows around the assumption half the audience isn't even looking at the screen. And honestly... they're probably right
421
JuunlarMar 27, 2026
+129
They're not *probably* right. They're right. Except that it's higher than 50%
129
Robert_B_MarksMar 27, 2026
+63
> They're not probably right. They're right. Except that it's higher than 50%
I think it's a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy/vicious cycle. Make shows with the assumption that viewers won't be paying attention, and you will attract viewers who aren't paying attention. This reinforces that your viewers aren't paying attention, so you make more shows to cater to that audience...
The sad thing is that there was probably a point (and hopefully still is) where showrunners could instead say, "people aren't paying attention to our shows...how can we improve them so that they do?
(And honestly, if your viewers are spending their time on their phones rather than watching your content, I think that reflects more on your content than the viewers...)
63
maybe-an-aiMar 27, 2026
+29
And viewers who are paying attention end up getting bored and going to their phones anyway.
29
7URB0Mar 27, 2026
+13
I just turn it off if it's that bad.
13
Hank_Scorpio_ObGynMar 27, 2026
+3
It's not even always because a show is bad.
Younger generations are accustomed to consuming media 1-3 minutes at a time, not dedicating 45-60 straight minutes to a piece of media.
We've all, out of habit, reached for our phones for no reason because that's all we do all day whether for work, school, socializing, bored, etc.
Hard to break that habit.
3
Squirrelking666Mar 27, 2026
+3
I keep seeing that quoted but is there any evidence that's actually true?
3
N-BizzleMar 27, 2026
+3
Your last point is exactly right - I almost always have my phone in hand but if the shows good enough my focus will be on that
3
CountVanillulaMar 27, 2026
+5
I think you’re right about the self-fulfilling prophecy, but not just because they’re attracting that type of viewer, but also because they’re \*creating\* that type of viewer. I might just be getting dumber (it feels that way), but I find myself kind of \*having\* to stare at my phone while I’m watching tv, because I just… I get the premise. The character is trapped in a vehicle. She’lol either get out or she won’t. Now someone else has to say why it’s going to be hard to save her. I know, I don’t care why. I don’t need the long shot of the actress in pain, I know she’s in pain, she’s trapped in a car. I don’t need the reaction shot of the guy staring at her concerned, I know he’s concerned. And then they go through the whole ordeal, and I just started looking at my phone because I was bored waiting for the conclusion. They’ll save her or they won’t, and I’m going to browse Listnook until they tell me which it is.
5
navjot94Mar 27, 2026
+1
The self fulfilling prophecy works out in the studios’ favor because it’s cheaper to produce. As usual they drive and justify their own enshitification.
1
LowcaMar 27, 2026
+19
I invited some friends over to watch The Sting in 4K on my new TV. Not a single person besides myself had seen it and I was excited to share the experience. I suggested collecting phones and legit got a look like I was an alien from space. Surprise, shock, bemusement.
Well literally 5m in, and I'm the only person watching it. Everyone else is just scrolling. I asked a simple question about the plot, like "oh haha, see that?" And just got a bunch of half-hearted grunts.
Nobody gives a c*** about shared experiences anymore. Just live in your little bubble and worry about the algorithm.
Funny thing is, most of them will say they've "seen" the film now. I probably couldn't get a plot synopsis out of one of them.
19
JuunlarMar 27, 2026
+2
We have specific things we watch where phones just aren't allowed. Appointment TV like The Pitt, Survivor, Daredevil; prestige TV for us; or, even movies we haven't seen.
Then there's things like sitcoms we've seen, Law and Order, Matlock, etc, where the plots are thin and it's easy to just have on as background noise while we scroll.
The idea of having my phone out during stuff I *want* to watch is f****** insane to me
2
MoooneyMar 27, 2026
+21
>The idea of having my phone out during stuff I want to watch is f****** insane to me
The idea of putting on shows I don't want to actually watch so I can scroll on my phone is f****** insane to me.
21
JuunlarMar 27, 2026
+2
Why? It's background noise, like listening to music. Shows that I'm only tangentially or partially interested in, or things I've seen before.
2
ButtPlugForPMMar 27, 2026
+6
because that show is art..1000s of ppl worked on it to make that product.
it's a visual medium it requires ur attention to convey it's message.
just use the phone or watch tv.
but most ppl can't do that they are addicted to their phone
6
MoooneyMar 27, 2026
+12
Having background noise 'while we scroll' is just so dystopian and sad to me.
12
Squirrelking666Mar 27, 2026
+7
Don't you want another screen wall? What's wrong with you?
7
MoooneyMar 27, 2026
+4
I did kind of have F451 in my head when I commented, haha.
4
LowcaMar 27, 2026
+3
"I just want to feel like I'm with other people, while I zone out to the algorithm, alone. Oooh! A sale on the niche product I like!"
3
well-lightedMar 27, 2026
+2
You’ve never had the TV on in the background while you did something else?
2
MoooneyMar 27, 2026
+3
Never. I know it's a thing lots of people do, but I don't understand it. I either watch TV or I don't.
3
amurica1138Mar 27, 2026
+12
My millenial daughter, caught in her natural habitat at home after work is commonly running 3 screens at once (at least) - tv/laptop streaming a show, a tablet with Instagram, TikTok or YT open and on her smartphone chatting with friends on Discord or IMing with her RL friends using noise cancelling headphones.
And God forbid I show up at her house unannounced. I would be banned for life.
12
thegracelesswonderMar 28, 2026
+3
I mean showing up unannounced was always rude, people just don’t put up with it anymore
3
DoodleBuggeringMar 27, 2026
+3
Just bring back radio dramas.
3
double_shadowMar 27, 2026
+6
I mean we kind of did with some of the serialized podcasts that got big...
6
VeronomeMar 27, 2026
+3
The irony is that a film with repetitive and trivial dialogue is also going to bore people, thus prompting them to keep going back to their phones.
3
The_RazielimMar 27, 2026
+3
My wife is like this. She'll sit in bed with something playing in the background while she does her nails, or crochets, or any other number of tasks.. then just rewind every few mins to catch up on what she wasn't paying attention to.
But also just the way she watches shows drives me insane and we can't watch anything together lol she doesn't even watch whole episodes, she just sorta skips through them, watches a scene then fast forwards through other stuff, seemingly at random. She'll also start a new show, start in the most recent season, *then* go back and watch previous seasons.
I don't get it, why even bother at that point... But whatever I've given up trying to make sense of it.
3
bros402Mar 27, 2026
+7
did you marry an alien
7
Silver-End9570Mar 27, 2026
+7
They're definitely right. I got irritated with my ex years ago because we were watching a movie and he was on his phone. And okay, that's wouldn't have been a major problem...except for the fact that the a****** decided that it was fine to watch a video at top volume.
To be fair, I don't think he paid full attention to literally anything we watched in the year or so we were together, but folks like him are the reason Stranger Things has to eat up 10 minutes of our time every episode explaining everything out bullet point by bullet point. Because realistically - half the folks watching it were really just skimming it by listening to it and only paying attention when they hear something that sounds important. Hell, for Stranger Things I was on my phone, but only because I was bored as shit all season and nothing really happened in the end anyway.
7
robby_synclairMar 27, 2026
+6
I think its partly a self fulfilling prophecy. I wasnt on my phone while watching severence. The 4 hour bert kreischer movie that was marketed as a sitcom? Sharing memes with my wife.
6
Salty-Werewolf-4119Mar 27, 2026
+5
dude this is so real, i teach fitness classes and have the tv on in the background and people are literally doing squats while "watching" their shows
like networks probably have data showing most viewers are folding laundry or scrolling instagram during episodes so they just lean into it hard with all the recap dialogue
5
EscapeSeventySevenMar 27, 2026
+26
To me there’s a huge difference between exercising, doing a light repetitive chore and scrolling on a separate screen reading/watching it.
26
LilacYakMar 27, 2026
+8
Yep I’m fully paying attention to the show when working out or doing laundry
8
YesmynameisOceanMar 27, 2026
+3
Yeah scrolling takes way more "focus" then lets say watching something while on a treadmill or listening to a podcast. Hell I'm listening to podcasts pretty much 24/7 while I'm at work and can still do my job and pay attention.
3
EscapeSeventySevenMar 27, 2026
+2
lol there’s no way I can do that at my job. But I have to write a lot of words.
2
Squirrelking666Mar 27, 2026
+2
Conversely I find folding washing during meetings helps me focus far more than sitting at the desk. Scrolling totally destroys any focus.
2
theghostsofvegasMar 27, 2026
+4
I got distracted halfway through your sentence. Do you have a TLDR?
4
KahzgulMar 27, 2026
+3
I pull out my phone *because* the show is stupid. I’d much rather have an engaging show full of subtitles that requires my attention, but instead we have this slop.
3
NoTitleChampMar 27, 2026
+118
Sometimes, Then I read some discussions online and think both tv and movies are given the auidance way too much credit.
118
IAmThePonchMar 27, 2026
+54
“Golly, that Tony soprano sure is a cool guy isn’t he??”
54
Vic_Vinegar89Mar 27, 2026
+28
“Is Tony Italian?? I’m on the series finale and he kinda sounds like he has an Italian accent. Thoughts?”
28
Astrosaurus42Mar 27, 2026
+7
I thought he was a varsity athelete.
7
WhatIsLoveMeDoMar 27, 2026
+2
He never had the makings of a varsity athlete.
2
GaryBuseyWithRabiesMar 27, 2026
+3
There are plenty of people who thought Tony was a good guy. Just like they thought Leo in Wolf of Wall Street and Gordon Gekko were heroes to emulate.
3
ChataboutgamesMar 27, 2026
+19
Recent favorite: post on this very sub who wrote a rant post about how The Pitt was beating us over the head with “technology bad”
19
tadcalabashMar 27, 2026
+33
For people who probably consume a ton of media, I'm often shocked at the lack of media literacy I see in online discussions.
People are regularly unable to infer anything that happens off screen, understand character motivations, or grasp backstory that's not laid out in an explicit flashback.
Though often I think those people just decide they dislike a show then are willfully obtuse when trying to argue that it's bad.
33
dspman11Mar 27, 2026
+8
The Pluribus sub was pretty rough as the first sesson aired. People asking questions directly answered by the show itself
8
blueSGLMar 27, 2026
+4
There is the flip side of this where an audience member is so invested in the show they will mentally fill in gaps, they have head canon that perfectly explains away the inconsistencies (and write large text wall missives about it)
This is really funny when future episodes/series put pay to the fact that the writing was not in fact smart and did not in fact have a grand plan.
The 'fill in the gaps' story people choose to make up in their head and smooth over inconsistencies is not the story shown on screen, only one of these is valid to talk about.
4
scenic_sardineMar 27, 2026
+2
I always hope that I'm not doing this but sometimes it feels hard not to. I think there's kind of a balance to it.
2
blueSGLMar 27, 2026
+4
I can enjoy things that are poorly written, cheesy fun, or that have great visuals and a threadbare plot and character, but I'll never elevate parts that are not good when discussing them or galaxy brain my way to a point where everything makes sense.
So many people have this weird idea that if you like something it must therefore be beyond reproach. They are a good person with perfect discernment, they only watch good things. Then anyone that comes along pointing out issues is personally wounding them.
Don't bind up your identity to the shows/movies you watch and it won't be an issue.
4
brobeanzhitlerMar 27, 2026
+16
The age old writing cornerstone, "tell, don't show"
16
PatchyWhiskersMar 27, 2026
+26
You should watch some pre-streaming serial TV. EVERYTHING is constantly repeated because they knew that people were half paying attention and missed last week's episode.
26
PaulFThumpkinsMar 28, 2026
+4
Yeah back in the day people were doing laundry or turning it on halfway through or whatever too, the only difference now is the shows are serialized instead of episodic. Normally a serialized show would count on people having seen everything up to that point, which is where people being on their phones versus watching broadcast TV comes in.
4
pendletonskyforceMar 27, 2026
+26
Whats a good example?
26
allmyhomiesluvlukaMar 27, 2026
+49
Stranger Things.
49
MelissaRose95Mar 27, 2026
+10
The new Percy Jackson tv show
10
shakegraphicsMar 27, 2026
+6
Starfleet academy
Acolyte
Halo
They genuinely have no subtleties or nuance, if the character hasn’t explained how they feel, they’re going to explain the exact circumstances that led to their feelings that was already shown on screen.
There’s way more i just don’t feel like goin nuts lol
6
mirachMar 27, 2026
+2
I don't think Starfleet Academy is a great example because it's a show about kids dealing with strong emotions for the first time so of course they are going to talk about it. A much better example is The Residence which had multiple characters repeat what was just shown with the assumption the viewer wasn't really watching.
2
ringoinsfMar 27, 2026
+47
I keep hearing about this but what are some specific examples of shows that are doing this? I feel like I haven't actually seen it in action yet (and no, it's not because I'm doomscrolling so not realizing it)
47
SwishDotaMar 27, 2026
+49
Stranger Things season 5, but it's not 'at the 35-38 minute' mark, it's at the 'every 5-8 minutes' mark.
49
carlos_the_dwarf_Mar 27, 2026
+3
This is more a clunky exposition device than a second-screen fix I’d say.
3
SwishDotaMar 27, 2026
+4
It's literally a directive from the higher ups at Netflix to make the dialog reiterate what is going on because they know most viewers are second-screen watching and not paying attention.
https://theweek.com/culture-life/tv-radio/netflix-and-the-second-screen-phenomenon
4
tvcneverdieMar 27, 2026
+32
It's gotta be super young people who grew up post-cord cutting and don't realize... Here's the thing.
TV has always done this.
It's not a "streaming" or any kind of new thing. Literally go find any top show from network television 15, 20, 30 years ago and it's all direct exposition, repetition, and hell sometimes a show would *REWIND* like 5 seconds of scene when coming back from a commercial break to remind a viewer where it just left off.
32
carlos_the_dwarf_Mar 27, 2026
+9
What’s that John Mulaney bit about Ice Tea on SVU? Every episode:
“You’re telling me this guy gets off on little kids?”
“Uh, yeah Ice…that’s the job. It’s been like 200 episodes.”
9
HerbsAndSpices11Mar 27, 2026
+3
TV was also more episodic, so it was fine if you missed a bunch of episodes. Now you have to watch it all, since it's more serialized.
3
ChataboutgamesMar 27, 2026
+7
Novels also often do this
7
scenic_sardineMar 27, 2026
+8
Emily in Paris. I haven't seen it but the term "ambient tv", as in tv that's on in the background that you can get the gist of without paying full attention to, was coined because of it.
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/emily-in-paris-and-the-rise-of-ambient-tv
8
thewholebottleMar 27, 2026
+2
Pretty sure Best Medicine does it. But I am also very dumb and find it helpful. And High Potential is always, "So what do we know so far." But I don't remember what I knew so far and the reminder is not informative.
2
Jabbles22Mar 27, 2026
+5
Also I've only seen complaints about this in the last few months.
5
OrtizDupriMar 27, 2026
+3
Yeah I’ve never seen this lol
3
fezfrascatiMar 27, 2026
+23
What I've enjoyed about Pluribus is how much of it is visual storytelling. If your eyes aren't on the show, you're missing the entire thing.
23
realhenrymccoyMar 27, 2026
+14
Vince Gilligan loves a long opening scene where you just follow some random character you’ve never met showing every little detail of some mundane task but it turns out to be something important.
I loved the introduction of pirate lady I think in the start of ep 2.
14
5_on_the_floorMar 27, 2026
+29
It’s been a formula for a long time; you’re only now starting to notice it. The beginning states the plot, the middle is mostly filler, attempted plot twists (the most obvious character is never the perp lol), and side plots (romantic tension among a couple of characters), and then it’s time to wrap up, so here’s a quick reca.
29
byebybuyMar 27, 2026
+16
Like, a *long* time. Repeating important exposition and plot points for the audience has been a thing since at least *Casablanca*. That movie is studied in film classes for this exact thing. They tell you everything like two or three times in that movie, it's just done elegantly so you don't really notice.
16
HerbsAndSpices11Mar 27, 2026
+3
Night Train To Munich (1940) is really bad for this, since the main characters turn to the camera to whisper their secret plan to each other (and the audience), while the Nazis are in the same room as them. I get it was early in cinema, but treating the audience like they are that stupid is pretty annoying.
3
TheDadThatGrillsMar 27, 2026
+12
I feel like this has always been true but these shows fade into obscurity over time. It feels different because the platform (cable vs. streaming) has changed.
12
NzyMar 27, 2026
+19
As someone in their late 30s who has watched quite a lot of TV and films, I'm not sure that it's any worse than ever. At least now we have waaaay more shows that feel like soprano's than we had back in the day.
When watching TV with my foreign partner I can see why they make everything so obvious. If you haven't watched as much TV or if English isn't your first language...or if you don't pay full attention you might need stuff spelled out for you.
Watching TV is like playing video games - after you've seen enough you know exactly what to expect and what to look out for.
19
mr_miggsMar 27, 2026
+18
I’m not sure if it’s because of this, but I have recently found myself not responding to most new shows that I pick up.
I’ve liked The Pitt, The Bear, A Knight of Seven Kingdoms and Pluribus enough that I stay engaged with them. Pretty much everything else I’ve started watching recently I just give up after a couple episodes.
I do think the fact that they treat audiences as though they’re half paying attention is probably degrading quality for a lot of shows. I also think that most people probably are only half paying attention and are on their phone. I’m sure it’s a hard balance, because if you make something that you need to pay close attention to, it needs to be pretty engaging otherwise you’re going to lose your viewers. So I think a lot of the material that needs to do. This is probably kind of shitty anyway.
18
Ancient-Dust3077Mar 27, 2026
+5
i don't know, ive seen some incredible shows that have come out past few years that I did not see the level of quality in the 90s.. so i disagree with you. I think we are getting both stupider shows and smarter shows. It's like the K shape curve, rich get richer poor get poorer; shows are getting dumber and smarterå
5
Razzler1973Mar 27, 2026
+15
I hear this complaint all the time but I swear it's always been like this
Expositon happening in dialogue cause we aren't going to see everyone's back story
*"yes, Diane (character name established) but you know I can't resist x and that's why you divorced me (establish relationship)
It doesn't offend me whatsoever and if they don't do this in a film I don't feel I deserve a cookie for how super clever I am
15
Salarian_AmericanMar 27, 2026
+3
And it's not even helping. All day long all I see on Listnook is dog-shit takes from people who clearly did not understand what they were watching, no matter how dumbed-down it is.
3
grinrMar 27, 2026
+3
There are competing reasons (and they're all winning simultaneously.) Poor education, lack of humanities and critical thinking mainly, lead to simple understandings - whole generations raised like robots with no experience exploring their own minds or the world. The attention economy is the metastasized result of advertising - you don't exist without being seen, so "engagement" is existential and perpetual. These contribute together to ensure huge numbers of people have no time to do anything but work constantly or seek dopamine - in short, no one has time, inclination, or ability to "think" about anything, especially entertainment.
3
snowhawk04Mar 27, 2026
+3
A lot of viewers **are** stupid, so writers gotta meet them where they are.
3
LaxSagacityMar 28, 2026
+3
The big issue that people rarely talk about is the decline in the writing talent. New writers used to come up working on shows doing 20+ episodes a year and forced to learn the art of concise storytelling with short deadlines. There was a mentorship and apprentice learning process about how to construct and effectively and efficiently tell a story. Then do it again straight away. That doesn't happen in this current age of TV.
People are show running with far less experience as a writer than was needed a decade or two ago. With new writers coming up under them.
While streamers may have some demands to cater to casual watchers, a big issue is the writers are padding out their work and don't have the confidence to trust the audience. They never learned how to concisely tell a story.
You can tell when you're watching a 8 episode season, and it's basically one story, a movie idea stretched out and padded. Versus a season where it is 8 stories, telling a larger story.
3
corporal_sweetieMar 27, 2026
+6
Yeah it f****** sucks.
6
JupiterInTheSkyMar 27, 2026
+8
I am so sick of listening to three characters reexplain the plot again and again in full sentences one right after the other. I get it, show me don't tell me.
8
ory1994Mar 27, 2026
+7
I recently watched His & Hers with my wife on Netflix and almost pulled my hair out when one of the detectives would keep asking the main character why they need to do something. I’m exaggerating but it would go something like:
“We need to go to the crime scene and scan for fingerprints.”
“Why do we need to do that?”
“Because if we find fingerprints, we can find a suspect.”
7
ButtPlugForPMMar 27, 2026
+6
yeah that shit is exactly what im talking about.
FBI on cbs which my wife for some reason loves does this FOR EVERYTHING
so..
New case information comes in..then the dude "jubel" has to then turn to someone else who just got the same info and tell them what they now need to do with it.
"Okay vivieene i need you to run this dudes license plate see where it is registered"
like she's an fbi agent who would know thats the next step and most viewers should be smart enough to know that...she would know that...but the viewer has to be told that in step so they know whats going on.
6
hairspraykingMar 27, 2026
+10
Cop shows specifically are made for the dumbest of TV audiences.
10
tgabsMar 27, 2026
+3
That’s what happens when the target audience is retirees. They have trouble following any but the most basic of storylines.
3
ReleventReferenceMar 27, 2026
+5
One of the major rules of storytelling is “tell don’t show”
5
ShadowWriter28Mar 27, 2026
+7
I completely agree but most people also have the attention span of a goldfish.
7
ButtPlugForPMMar 27, 2026
+8
Let us be brutally honest even a goldfish would not be stupid enough to elect trump a 2nd time.
8
ShadowWriter28Mar 27, 2026
+3
I am not going to disagree with you. I am still shocked that he got elected.
3
5k1895Mar 27, 2026
+2
Based on some of the basic ass questions or fundamental lack of understanding I see from people regarding shows that DON'T do this, I get why it happens. Media literacy is at a low point.
2
justhereforhidesMar 27, 2026
+2
Given the amount of obvious questions that are asked in different tv show sublistnooks it probably is necessary
2
Afferbeck_Mar 27, 2026
+2
This has been a thing in procedurals since forever, due to not wanting to lose people who are too dumb to interpret to what they are seeing and hearing, and not wanting to lose people flipping channels who don't know what's happening.
2
AnonymousFriend80Mar 27, 2026
+2
Viewers need to stop proving them correct over and over.
2
kingkongwormMar 27, 2026
+2
Yeah…I don’t disagree generally, but TV used to be thought of as disposable and inconsequential content that mostly existed as a means of advertising oven cleaner and sub prime mortgages…then the prestige era started, but that’s transformed into tv that is big budget but influenced mostly by the algorithm and even more granular demographic data…hopefully it’ll swing back, but I think this is a phase that will eventually push viewers toward other things.
2
bwanabassMar 27, 2026
+2
Television shows are written for the phone-scrolling audience that isn’t really paying attention these days, unfortunately. Hence the constant plot recaps via dialogue to fill everyone in that wasn’t paying attention. It sucks.
2
osmlolMar 27, 2026
+2
Because they are stupid and won't stop looking at their phones. Those who can pay attention are the outliers now.
2
neonTULIPSMar 27, 2026
+2
I was glad Tell Me Lies didn’t do this and just trusted the audience to get it. But then browsing that sub after it aired made my brain hurt because no one could use the very blatant context clues to figure things out and argues that since certain things weren’t explicitly spelled out for them they didn’t understand.
2
canigetsumgreypouponMar 27, 2026
+2
i just watch old shows - modern television is straight up garbage and honestly a great representation of the brain rot affecting most of society
2
RebuttlahMar 27, 2026
+2
i stopped watching shows that do this
2
braunyakkaMar 27, 2026
+2
These decisions are driven by studio execs who are quite often the stupidest people in the room.
2
joeyweb32Mar 27, 2026
+2
I hear you. But then you have a show like Andor and people complain that it's too slow.
2
FGX302Mar 27, 2026
+2
Ok Bots, can you at least give some examples. This topic has been an over the internet Fire the past month or so.
2
Tomhyde098Mar 27, 2026
+2
I rarely watch newer tv shows. I have such a backlog of older shows that I’ll be busy for years. I do try to watch newer stuff sometimes like The Penguin and I enjoy it, but mostly I’m not a fan of new shows
2
DriyenMar 27, 2026
+2
Maybe you need to watch smarter shows
2
Angry_WalnutMar 27, 2026
+2
And just because there are stupid and disinterested viewers doesn’t mean they should be catered to, honestly seems like an excuse for studios to put out absolute shit content.
2
SkAnKhUnTFoRtYtwMar 28, 2026
+2
Better Call Saul, Sopranos, The Wire, Mr. Robot, and more recently Pluribus are the shows that I've seen that I think are the best at NOT doing this.
Comedy wise, definitely arrested development.
2
gendrywaterzMar 28, 2026
+2
You forget they need to cater to 77 million of the lowest possible denominators Trump voters…
2
Niku-ManMar 28, 2026
+2
Provide some examples
2
thenaschMar 27, 2026
+3
I just encountered this in Blindspot. A few minutes ago we learned that there are 40 canisters of poison gas missing. An agent says they've found 36. Ok we're up to speed right? Nope. Team leader says "The general said there were 40 missing." All right now we all know the situation. Apparently not. Agent 3 then says "That means there are 4 still unaccounted for." Thank you agent 3 I wasn't sure what 40 minus 36 is.
3
paul_having_a_ballMar 27, 2026
+2
This sounds like writing from a 90s drama. After the second commercial break characters almost always recap (in conversation) what is going on for audiences that joined late.
2
False_Appointment_24Mar 27, 2026
+3
Does anyone have an example of this? Because I am just not seeing it. I don't know if I'm clueless, or if I just don't watch the type of shows that have them (I promise I am not bragging about anything here.)
The most recent show I watched was "The Night Manager", with Tom Hiddleston. Others I have seen in the past year are "Fallout" and "IT: Welcome to Derry". I think we're starting up "The Pitt" this weekend.
I have heard this specifically about Netflix shows. Is that were it is concentrated?
3
NoDadYouShutUpMar 27, 2026
+3
77 million people voted for Trump. Sadly, there are massive numbers of functionally brain dead people in the audience. They treat the audience like they are stupid, because they are.
3
johnsmiththeMar 27, 2026
+2
I started watching modern family recently, and this is exactly how i feel despite it being a 15 year old show. Like the jokes are so obvious and STILL they have a talking head segment of them explaining the already obvious joke, i just dont get it.
Ik this isnt that relevent i just needed to vent. But yes, modern tv is in a painful spot
2
Caesar_RisingMar 27, 2026
+2
It’s very evident in many shows and maybe that’s why I’ve enjoyed watching The Pitt so much. That show really just says “hey if you’re not paying attention you’re getting left behind. They literally have characters ask questions to each other and explain what they’re doing but it never feels like exposition or even really attempts to hold your hand, it’s just doctors talking to doctors”
2
Emotional_Signal7883Mar 27, 2026
+1
The beauty of live sports is that they were unknowingly future-proof for the smartphone era.
1
cokeiscoolMar 27, 2026
+1
Hey you said it at the beginning
It's the cell phones. So many people are on their phone while watching these shows. If they don't do those dumb it down scenes people will miss important plot points and maybe just give up on watching the show
1
YoF3Mar 27, 2026
+1
Watch the Pitt ! So refreshing for this reason, it doesn't take you by the hand, you're in charge of what you remember from the previous episodes
1
PhantomNomadMar 27, 2026
+1
I've always hated the "Last time on ..." About the only time I need a recap is when it's 2+ years between seasons, then then I can always search that out my self.
1
raviaMar 27, 2026
+1
Try Britbox, Acorn or MHZ.
1
KeremyJylesMar 27, 2026
+1
I'd sure love to hear some specific examples that establish this apparently overwhelming pattern.
1
Myanmar_on_my_MindMar 27, 2026
+1
Have you seen how people write now? There are actual adults out there out-sourcing their brains to LLMs. Television isn’t pandering anymore.
1
Boring_Bother_Mar 27, 2026
+1
> about 35 minutes to 38 minutes into the run time
Shit needs to stop trying to be prestige TV. A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms was perfect in this sense
1
ThePaineOneMar 27, 2026
+1
I feel like this almost always happened post commercial breaks in the past.
1
ChataboutgamesMar 27, 2026
+1
People b**** about the quality of everything always
1
second_toastacctMar 27, 2026
+1
This is a deliberate thing that companies are forcing writers to do now because marketing tells them (correctly) that the majority of users are viewing TV as a "second screen viewing," with their attention primarily on their phone. So, the show must be written so that it can be followed by someone who is not watching the screen.
Jameela Jamil talks openly about it here.
[https://www.listnook.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1of89mc/jameela\_jamil\_explains\_how\_tv\_shows\_are/](https://www.listnook.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1of89mc/jameela_jamil_explains_how_tv_shows_are/)
1
TheShadyGuyMar 27, 2026
+1
Now, lol.
1
paragon-interruptMar 27, 2026
+1
Discussing The Pitt is exhausting half the time because people make shit up half the time and it telegraphs that they are not paying attention *at all* lmao
1
brownepMar 27, 2026
+1
Reminds me of that actor (director?) who said they need to explicitly explain the plot in Netflix movies because young people are on their phones (WHILE WATCHING A MOVIE???) and don’t know what’s happening, horrifying article.
1
PKblazeMar 27, 2026
+1
I don't watch much tv but I find it very tiresome when things are stated more than a couple of times. Like I get the characters are maybe discussing things they learned with other characters but you don't need to have them explain events play by play, especially when it's just not relevant. It's lazy and it sucks.
1
Ancient-Dust3077Mar 27, 2026
+1
i don't know, ive seen some incredible shows that have come out past few years that I did not see the level of quality in the 90s.. so i disagree with you. I think we are getting both stupider shows and smarter shows. It's like the K shape curve, rich get richer poor get poorer; shows are getting dumber and smarterå
1
ex0thermistMar 27, 2026
+1
I hear this all the time, but I need specific examples because I haven't noticed it very much in the shows that I watch.
1
zoobisoubisouMar 27, 2026
+1
Some shows do. But we are so spoiled for choice and there is a lot of great television out there.
1
1cecream4breakfastMar 27, 2026
+1
I recently read that this is highly intentional by writers/studios because they know people aren’t fully paying attention. It’s not “some ppl” it’s most people.
1
Infamous-Lab-8136Mar 27, 2026
+1
I was until I started engaging with people that insist they're not on their phones on various sublistnooks for shows who still can't absorb something they just watched
We have questions on The Pitt sublistnook last night about where a character was in that episode. One person was complaining because they can't be expected to remember that last week he asked to accompany a patient into surgery. Thing is last night a character asked where he was and someone reminded him that he followed his patient to the OR. When people told them to put their phone done they vehemently insisted they did
And it happens constantly on every show. It's not even enough for them to come out and directly state something with a character later in dialog because people just don't even listen and every time a bunch of people who still missed key plot points insist they're paying attention fully
1
KrivUKMar 27, 2026
+1
Hate this dialogue to cater to second screen watching.
Just put your phone down and watch the f****** show.
Can you imagine some of the classics like B5, DS9, Farscape, 24, The West Wing, Sopranos etc having to do this shit. F*** that.
1
BerkyjayMar 27, 2026
+1
It's been this way since reality TV
1
boomosaurMar 27, 2026
+1
Hate to break it to you, but the viewers really are that stupid.
1
77ateMar 27, 2026
+1
Depends what you mean by “over” it.
“Over it”, as in, “I couldn’t care less”? Maybe.
“Over it”, as in, “I gave up watching TV decades ago”, then, yeah.
1
El_humanMar 27, 2026
+1
Yes, and unfortunately it's working its way into movies as well. Netflix has a policy, that the plot must be restated three or four times throughout the movie, as a stipulation for it to be in production for their studio.
I crave movies with quality, by people like Stanley Kubrick, Ari Astor, David Fincher, etc. that level of quality is a very hard thing to find these days
1
UltimaLyonMar 27, 2026
+1
OP, I love your optimism but 99% of people are willingly stupid. 🤣
1
PropDadMar 27, 2026
+1
Ever since it was pointed out to me a few months ago in an article that they were doing this, it's really standing out to me now. We were just watching Monarch last night and we would comment every time they did something like that. They could shorten the show if they didn't do it.
1
LonesomeWulfMar 27, 2026
+1
This is why Game of Thrones was so good. Everything was mysterious and intriguing because I couldn’t keep track of half the characters and plot lines, especially with breaks between seasons.
1
COMMANDEREDHMar 27, 2026
+1
Don't watch the dumb shows, there are plenty of good ones to fill your time.
1
AndNowAStoryAboutMeMar 27, 2026
+1
Try The Leftovers. It does the opposite.
1
Oh_hey_a_TAAMar 27, 2026
+1
It's an ouroboros situation. They literally started engineering shows and movies to support "second screen usage", which lowered the bar, which required even more consideration for second screens...
And here we are just a few years later and every few scenes require an exposition dump.
1
h3rpad3rpMar 27, 2026
+1
I stopped watching Cable TV like 15-20 years ago because the advertisements treated the audience like they had a single digit IQ.
Ever seen an infomercial? Good God...
1
AporiaParadoxMar 27, 2026
+1
I would argue that it actually used to be a lot worse, TV shows treating the audiences like idiots is nothing new. Not helped by how before streaming, shows were written with the expectation that many viewers would tune in several minutes into the show as well as an expectation that any episode could be someone's first and they'd be watching them out of order, so information often got repeated even more than in modern shows, especially after commercial breaks.
1
Wonderful-Creme-3939Mar 27, 2026
+1
It makes me want to doomscroll or turn it off.
1
madmadaaMar 27, 2026
+1
Yeah, whenever comes a masterpiece like The Acolyte, people say it doesn't make sense and full of plot holes.
1
JebusJMMar 27, 2026
+1
To be fair, the break between seasons is long enough to forget everything.
The break between The Capture season 2 and 3 was almost 4 years.
1
BeHappy123456789Mar 28, 2026
+1
Why would producers think ppl are smart? Netflix top 10 speaks for itself. If you think tv is stupid, first we should check if we are part of the problem. If we watched “stranger things” then we cant b****. If we thought one piece la was a good show, then we cant complain. We are part of the problem. Only ppl who never interacted with the sin of consuming dogshit content are allowed to b**** tbh.
1
ScreenTricky4257Mar 28, 2026
+1
I think part of that is that so many series these days are serials. It's all about resolving plots from the previous episode and setting up plots for the next. They don't make self-contained shows anymore.
1
PaulaDeenSlaveMar 28, 2026
+1
Im on what has to be my 60th rematch of The Wire and 10th of True Detective S1.
1
Nvenom8Mar 28, 2026
+1
Based on my experience of the people around me over the past several decades, I fear it’s quite necessary.
1
VestalminMar 28, 2026
+1
I feel like it just depends on the show you choose to watch. That’s always somewhat been the case
1
jadethebardMar 28, 2026
+1
I've been multitasking while watching TV my entire life. Before cellphones it was drawing or playing with toys or playing board games, etc. I follow along better that way. If I try to watch without a sidetask I almost always fall asleep. The only things I genuinely hate about newer TV is showing text messages on the screen. Some of us still watch television on televisions across the room and also have trouble reading tiny script in various colors. This feels specifically made for people watching TV on cellphones, not us dinosaurs who still like a big screen.
The point of my ramble is that multitasking is not a new phenomenon and dumbing down the writing is insulting.
1
eddmarioMar 28, 2026
+1
Didn't Matt Damon or Brad Pitt or someone else confirm this is literally what Netflix requires their scripts to have?
1
arkhamiusMar 28, 2026
+1
I dont really watch wester movies or series Soni don’t have this kind of problem
1
Kgb725Mar 28, 2026
+1
Ive seen people watch Harry potter and get confused why Hermione didnt present the wand even though the same scene clearly states they were onto her and knew the wand was stolen
1
jbrowder24Mar 28, 2026
+1
This year's Oscars actually had a bit on this, albeit with movies. Here's the clip with Conan O'Brien and Sterling K. Brown in case you missed it: https://youtu.be/fQK_Uy8xjZg
193 Comments