· 188 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 20, 2026 at 4:55 PM

Anyone else frustrated by the high volume of television prescription drug advertisements on TV?

Posted by MatchaMan007


The amount of prescription drug ads these days (Amazon Prime, CNBC, etc.) are overwhelming and depressing. Perhaps this goes to prove (sort of) that the healthcare is nothing but profitable business, sadly.

🚩 Report this post

188 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
NoTitleChamp 5 days ago +84
I'm British but often use a VPN on American sites. it genuinely amazes me those ads are allowed. "ask your doctor for medication x"", No the doctor advise me on medication not the other way round,
84
GoAgainKid 5 days ago +33
To add to this point, in case Americans don't realise it, we do not have any ads whatsoever for prescription medicine in this country.
33
ukexpat 5 days ago +16
In fact the only two countries where it is permitted are the US and New Zealand.
16
[deleted] 4 days ago +5
[deleted]
5
AltruisticRider 4 days ago +2
In a sane world, any doctor that gets any kind of kickback like that would lose their license instantly.
2
myassholealt 5 days ago +4
Cause you guys get to buy the generic/discounted formulas. We're stuck having to pay out the ass for the brand name patent-protected designer drugs, and recouping the marketing budget is a big part of that price.
4
GoAgainKid 5 days ago +12
Well sort of. We get brand and generics (after a certain time) for over the counter stuff, but with the way prescriptions work here, there's no incentive for the drug companies to advertise to the consumer. We get little to no input in what we receive on prescription (beyond presenting symptoms) and the doctors aren't influenced in the same way.
12
bros402 5 days ago +13
well don't worry, our doctors don't get to decide our drugs in the end: the insurance company decides if we can get it
13
Hanifsefu 4 days ago +10
*our insurance company's new AI algorithm decides if we need medicine.
10
neongreenpurple 4 days ago +2
They don't increase the number of prescriptions written (mostly because it usually goes the way you mentioned). But they do increase the number of prescriptions refilled.
2
Familiar-Banana-8116 5 days ago +6
Consider: What if the effect they are after is not necessarily, 'Hey doc I really want 'drugnamefromTV' to treat the wart on my testees!' And what it really is, is, 'Hmmm I have had that incredible wart on my testees for years now, maybe I should ask my doctor about it?'. There is an other side of this coin to consider as well. Drug reps run to doctors constantly pushing medication. When you walk through the door asking about the wart on your testees the doctor is already prepped cause the marketing push to your TV included a marekting push from the drug rep.
6
jake3988 5 days ago +3
> Consider: > > What if the effect they are after is not necessarily, 'Hey doc I really want 'drugnamefromTV' to treat the wart on my testees!' > > And what it really is, is, 'Hmmm I have had that incredible wart on my testees for years now, maybe I should ask my doctor about it?'. That's the case for me with migraines. I've suffered for them from years but until relatively recently there was ZERO treatment for them. Now, thanks to ads on tv, I know there's like a half dozen treatments... which means I need to get my butt to the doctor so I can get one. That said, I know a ton of people that get migraines and none of their medications help them at all... so... it probably won't work anyway.
3
lessmiserables 5 days ago +3
But most of these ads aren't for "here is this life saving medicine for your cancer," it's almost always "hey, that problem you had that five years ago didn't have a solution? Well, now there is." Or, more likely, "Existing prescription has side effects X, Y, and Z. This new one has X, A, and B. Maybe you'll like this one better!" And a good number of the ads are for "optional" cures, like allergies or heartburn, that are still prescription strength. None of those are things your doctor is going to proactively offer you because they almost certainly don't realize it's an issue for you. I always find these arguments against prescription ads to be a bit weird. It's like people have a visceral reaction and don't actually pay attention to what's being said. I don't love Rx ads either but they're not nearly as nefarious as people make them out to be.
3
jake3988 5 days ago +3
> I don't love Rx ads either but they're not nearly as nefarious as people make them out to be. What I don't understand is the drugs they actually advertise. One of them, seemingly the most common, is for 'plaque psoriasis'. I've never known anyone in my entire life (either personally, celebrity, random person online, anyone) that's had that. How is there enough people in the country with plaque psoriasis that it's worth advertising that freaking medication NON FREAKING STOP? I get it for migraines, or cancer, or A1C medication with so many overweight diabetics (those are the others I see commonly). But... plaque psoriasis?!
3
lessmiserables 5 days ago +5
> plaque psoriasis Funnily enough, this is a perfect example! I didn't know anything about it, either, but a quick google search shows: 1. 80-90% of all psoriasis is plaque psoriasis, so if you know *anyone* who has psoriasis, it's almost certainly plaque psoriasis. It's about 3% of the total population has some form of psoriasis, so...that's a lot. 2. There is no cure, but previous treatments were basically ointments and UV treatments. A new drug that helps is actually legitimately a new thing--which is something you'd make an appointment for w/ a doctor to talk about, which is exactly why these ads exist!
5
itdothstink 2 days ago +1
Those drugs usually work on many different autoimmune disorders and these companies make different commercials highlighting the different conditions the drug is meant to treat.
1
throwaway35mmshots 5 days ago +2
This works until your doctor isn’t up to date with the latest prescription guidelines or latest drug advances. As someone with a chronic illness, I NEED to ask my doctor and guide them about my treatment or else I get nothing, and I’m not even talking about medication only. I don’t think TV commercials are necessarily the best way to communicate to patients, tho.
2
pumpkinspruce 5 days ago +2
Yes. The ads can be helpful. Even if the drug advertised is not right for a person, it can’t hurt to ask your doctor about it. Lots of doctors don’t keep up with research and medical news. It does illustrate how much drug companies are making when they can buy so much ad time and make so many commercials though. Like taxpayers pay for a lot of R&D, shouldn’t the profits that come from that be used to subsidize drug costs for us rather than buying ad time on TV?
2
Sandy_Koufax 5 days ago
Small detail but it’s always “If you experience [bla bla bla] ask your doctor *about* [whatever]”. I hate them too but I don’t know how they could constitutionally ban these ads and have it not run an issue with our first amendment right to speech. They’re technically just telling you to become informed. They could maybe restrict them on broadcast TV but no way for any streaming.
0
Boring_Bother_ 5 days ago +4
They banned tobacco ads
4
philbofa 5 days ago +2
“Side effects include anxiety, depression, and gouging out your own eye balls” yeah thanks. Just wanted to watch the game with my kid
2
GABE_EDD 5 days ago +34
It's also always like >Symptoms may include diarrhea (dad pushing kid on swing) constapation (family walking in park) abnormally high blood pressure (family laughing at dinner) it is also known to cause cancer or death (child being helped with homework by parent) and it's always funny to me.
34
Chataboutgames 5 days ago +20
My favorite is the new allergy disclaimer that seems new to me. "Do not take Lexapro if allergic to Lexapro." Sounds reasonable.
20
VerilyShelly 5 days ago +3
I've noticed that weird feature for years. Like duh. If I had taken the drug and it caused a negative reaction I don't need to be told not to take it, do I? But I guess enough people weirdly did that it needs to be a common disclaimer now.
3
itdothstink 2 days ago +1
Likely because of some dumbass who was allergic to a drug, still took it, sued and some dumb jury awarded damages.
1
martyrdumb38315 5 days ago +8
My favorite is the deadly taint infection side effect.
8
bootymix96 5 days ago +2
[Eucrisa](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mebghhoSomQ): do not use in eyes, mouth, or v*****.
2
Y0___0Y 5 days ago +10
Ebglebga will KILL you!! Ebglebga will KILL you!! Ebglebga will KILL you! Ask your doctor if Ebglebga is right for you
10
Pitiful_Mouse_5225 5 days ago +5
I always liked: "if you're allergic to this drug, don't use this drug."
5
launchcode_1234 5 days ago +5
Causing both diarrhea and constipation is always interesting to me
5
d11dd11d 5 days ago +4
Saw one that was like "may cause lesions on a*** or genitals", and I'm like aww hell nah I'll just live with ulcerative colitis (I don't think it was a drug for UC)
4
gayteemo 5 days ago +3
what’s funny to me is that people complain about what is legally mandated fair balance while supplement companies are out here promising to 10x the size of your balls with no fair balance.
3
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +2
They're all smiling and reading books and "doing normal life" like going to cookouts as the voiceover guy says so calmly that the drug may be responsible for diarreah.
2
okay_then_ 5 days ago +2
Every time my VPN is switched to the US my YouTube ads just become this. Your country is so f****** weird lmao
2
bryan49 5 days ago +2
Yes seriously. I don't get how these ads are effective. I've never once in my life picked a medication just because I saw a TV ad for it. I just take what the doctor prescribes
2
gayteemo 5 days ago +4
in other words, you’re privileged or otherwise healthy enough to have never needed to self advocate within the existing healthcare system.
4
vowelqueue 5 days ago +4
A lot of the time do you actually have a choice between different medications and your doctor will present options to you instead of just choosing one. As part of that conversation you can advocate for yourself and ask about certain medications. Additionally, there are conditions that people may deal either but have not seen a doctor about. If someone is dealing with like depression or their erections haven’t been as strong as they’d like, I could see how an ad might trigger them making a doctor appointment.
4
floridorito 5 days ago +3
A number of people suffer with conditions "in silence" and don't bother seeing a doctor because there weren't any treatments 10+ years ago, or they've tried everything unsuccessfully in the past. Pharmaceutical ads are for newer medications, so seeing ads can prompt those people to make an appointment.
3
jbascnc 5 days ago +1
My favorite is "If you're allergic to (brandname), don't take (brandname)."
1
T0Rtur3 5 days ago +26
This isn't new to television. It's been that way for more than 30 years.
26
RegulatoryCapture 5 days ago +8
They feel way more prevalent than they used to be.  Probably because the demos have shifted. Prime time used to be way more valuable to advertisers so you only got the high budget pharma ads (like OG Claritin balloons) and they were diluted with lots of other product ads.  Now ALL TV feels like the 2PM Tuesday time s*** used to feel. The people still watching ad supported network TV (or free streaming apps) are the same types of people who were watching daytime TV 25 years ago. 
8
hotdoug1 5 days ago +4
The streaming ads are in part because of who you are. If you're over a certain age you're going to see a lot more.
4
vowelqueue 5 days ago +4
The drug market is also different. In the year 2000 the top selling drugs were like Lipitor and made a few billion. Now the market is full of very expensive biologic drugs for autoimmune diseases and cancers that are hard/impossible to make generics, new GLP1 drugs have been very successful, etc. There are more drugs out there and the pharma companies have more money to spend on ads.
4
itdothstink 2 days ago +1
Just be glad that the class action settlement commercials haven't inundated the networks yet. Those are all over the channels that don't even pretend to cater to younger demos. Medicare enrollment season is a special kind of commercial hell on those channels.
1
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +5
RFK Jr threatened to take them all off the air when Trump became president. It was the only good thing he said. And they're still not off the air.
5
Chataboutgames 5 days ago +4
That would have been cool, but it would take a lot more than a an order form a regulatory agency. That would be a case that would make it to SCOTUS.
4
Horny_GoatWeed 5 days ago +3
Network television is barely making any money as it is. Taking away their main source of income will not make things better.
3
faultysynapse 5 days ago +20
My country has heavy restrictions on what and how you're allowed to advertise drugs. It's great. Anytime I go to the states and get bombarded with drug advertisements it kind of drives me crazy.
20
unkyduck 5 days ago +4
Only the US and New Zealand what's up with that ?
4
RegulatoryCapture 5 days ago +4
To be clear, I think drug ads suck.  But I do find them way easier to ignore than anything else. I don’t even know what “moderate to severe plaque psoriasis” is, let alone do I need a drug for it.  Very easy to tune out and I know they aren’t actually influencing me, whereas as much as I hate to admit it, a loud commercial with a catchy slogan for fast food or candy absolutely does influence me and make me more likely to try it. 
4
Specialist_Seal 5 days ago +6
I don't know either, but it always gives me a hankering for some Skyrizi...
6
RegulatoryCapture 5 days ago +1
What's wild to me is how narrow some of these categories are. A quick google estimates there are only 2 million people in the USA with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Crohn's is closer to 1 million. These aren't ads for weight loss drugs or allergies that impact a large share of the population. These are ads that have no value to the vast majority of viewers--they will literally NEVER be a customer. No matter how much they like the commercial, they will never buy Skyrizi or Rinvoq. Crazy that it is worth spending so much money to put these ads in front of people like you and me just because <1% of viewers might be customers. Especially once you take out people who are either already on the drug, whose doctors have said they CAN'T be on the drug, or who are already well aware of it.
1
vowelqueue 5 days ago +2
As someone with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, I find them hard to ignore. It sucks when you just want to relax but are constantly reminded of your incurable chronic illnesses.
2
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +2
This is the way. In the US drug companies have too much power so any regulation is unlikely anytime soon
2
nextact 5 days ago +3
The US was that way until close to 2000. I actually remember the first drug ad I saw and was very taken aback. I hadn’t realized it was banned until they started airing.
3
faultysynapse 5 days ago +4
The US has had heavy advertisements for drugs since long before 2000. I remember going there all through the '90s and seeing it everywhere.
4
nextact 4 days ago +3
I’m sorry, I was specifically referring to television ads. In 1997 the laws changed to make it far easier for companies to create tv ads. Something about what risks had to be disclosed. But yeah, print ads were everywhere.
3
MultiPass21 5 days ago +50
I don’t pay any attention to commercials. They’re just white noise to me.
50
rumski 5 days ago +6
If I’m watching “media” on my TV it’s either my Plex or SmartTube but my wife uses whatever the Hell apps and I think it’s PlutoTV and there’s this ad I hear constantly about an acne medication with side effects of genital sores and possible death.
6
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +1
Exactly! So annoying
1
alyosha_pls 5 days ago +1
Acne medicine and horrific side effects. An iconic duo. 
1
SovFist 5 days ago +3
My favorite is the one that's marketed as acne medicine that doubles as birth control and i was like "this wasn't a planned outcome"
3
sexandliquor 5 days ago +2
“May make your p**** fall out. If you’re concerned with increased chances of your p**** falling out then talk to your doctor to make sure that this medication is right for you”
2
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +1
Good point. For many, hard to tune it out tho
1
ty1771 5 days ago +2
Sounds like ADHD…ask your doctor about Adderall!
2
Surtock 4 days ago +1
My tv has a mute feature.
1
MaskedBandit77 5 days ago +8
Yes, there are definitely other people who are annoyed by both the high volume of commercials, and prescription drug commercials. People complain about both of these things all the time. I have a hard time believing that you've never heard or read anyone else say that they're frustrated about it.
8
luckynativetexan 5 days ago +19
Totally! They are as bad as political candidate commercials.
19
Chataboutgames 5 days ago +9
I don't know about that. I'm no fan of any commercial but political candidate commercials are like, perfectly engineered to be offensive to the ear. Plus they remind you that politics exist.
9
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +5
Those are the worst. Those legit lie to you but you have to watch it because local TV is required to air them. Even if it's not true. "Democrat Joe Neely wants to let men into women's bathrooms. Can you trust Joe Neely?"
5
sexandliquor 5 days ago +7
The ones in Texas are all the most unhinged shit I’ve ever seen I swear to god. Even ones for local city races. “Bob Mcnulty wants OPEN BORDERS, MARXIST IDEALS, JOE BIDEN ERA SOCIALISM, TRANSIES IN YOUR BATHROOMS. If he’s elected you better hold your loved ones close and kiss your ass goodbye. Stock up on food and bullets. Everything is going t*** up if you vote for Bob Mcnulty” And I’m like: this is a political ad for the local tax assessor-collector? This is doing too much. lol
7
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +1
If not worse
1
dystopiadattopia 5 days ago +7
No, but my doctor is getting sick of me asking if medications are right for me
7
bootymix96 5 days ago +5
The really wild part is how niche they’re getting. 10-20 years ago the target consumer for these commercials was a far broader audience, relatively speaking—people with major depressive disorder, for example—but now the commercials have such a small laser-focused target consumer that it really leaves a majority of the audience just scratching their heads in confusion. The most niche one I’ve seen so far was some drug for people with “HR-positive HIR2-negative breast cancer,” and while I’m all for making sure patients are informed and are able to advocate for their care, I can’t help but wonder how many people from this group actually (a) saw the commercial, (b) “asked their doctor” about it, and (c) their doctor didn’t know about it beforehand.
5
OkayAtBowling 5 days ago +3
Yeah exactly, I've noticed that as well. Now it's not just depression medication it's, "If your depression medication isn't working as well as you'd like, ask your doctor about ____ which you can take in addition to your normal medication..." My main takeaway from that is that these drug companies don't actually need to reach *that* many people to make it worthwhile for them to spend the money on these ads. Even if it's only relevant to less than 1% of people watching, and even if only a fraction of those people ask their doctor about it, and a fraction of *those* people end up actually taking the medication... the drug companies still think it's worthwhile. Maybe it's because those specialized medications are very expensive/profitable for them, and it's the widest advertising net you can cast if you're looking to reach a small number of people.
3
vowelqueue 5 days ago +2
That’s like the most common type of breast cancer I think. But yeah, the drugs can be more niche because of how expensive a lot of them are. They can easily cost like $100k-200k per year
2
StuffonBookshelfs 5 days ago +13
These days? This has been happening for almost 30 years.
13
Paper_Street_Soap 5 days ago +4
As someone who only watches commercials in a hotel room on occasional work trips, it’s gotten MUCH worse in recent years.  It’s like the last gasp of traditional television. 
4
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +1
Correct, but more so now than ever
1
StuffonBookshelfs 5 days ago +5
Honestly, I’d take the drug ads over the gambling ads any day of the week.
5
Kundrew1 5 days ago +4
It’s really not more than ever. It’s closer to the same as ever only difference is the variety of platforms they air on.
4
damned_squid 5 days ago +13
Can't get TV ads if you're sailing the seas
13
Moooney 5 days ago +3
For serious. I haven't paid a cent or watched TV with ads since I moved out of my parents house in 2002.
3
piscikeeper 5 days ago +1
I prefer to be under rather than on. Sonarr all the time.
1
agent_wolfe 5 days ago +1
Sonarr?
1
piscikeeper 5 days ago +3
Dell server in the basement. Sonarr let's me add TV shows and then it downloads and organizes them. Plex server lets me stream to any TV or computer. No commercials in HDTV rips.
3
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +1
True !
1
quirkymuse 5 days ago +3
Better them than sports betting apps 
3
DanFarrell98 5 days ago +6
Must be a US thing
6
Mediocre-Touch-6133 5 days ago +3
We don't get them as much here in Canada. Instead we're flooded with annoying gambling ads.
3
its_justme 5 days ago +3
That’s how I know I’m watching an American channel. Drug commercials, lawyers trying to collect. They’re not allowed in Canada which is nice.
3
viscosity-breakdown 5 days ago +3
They have good music on those things. Jardience is really swell the little pill with a big story to tell
3
aniamixon 5 days ago +3
My mom says it's always fast food ad, beer ad, followed by prescription drug ad.
3
ratjar32333 5 days ago +5
NOTHING MEANS EVERYTHING TO MEEEEEEEE. SKYRIZI HAUNTS MY DREAMS
5
rumski 5 days ago +5
I really want to be sarcastic and rude about the “these day” part but I’ll abstain. But yes.
5
MatchaMan007 5 days ago +1
lol yes yes been happening since over 3 decades, etc. all true, but these days more than ever
1
RedHeadedSicilian52 5 days ago +2
Population’s getting older, dog, and therefore more reliant on various medications. It is what it is.
2
siqofitall 5 days ago +2
I always hated ads. But for the love of god they’re all so fake feeling. Everything feels like a grift or an ad for a mobile game. I’d give anything to see a f****** tide commercial at least. Jesus.
2
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +3
The stark difference between US and Korean ads is telling. US has the worst ads in the world. Korean ones are actually funny or realistic.
3
Pretend-Mango-1295 5 days ago +2
Pharmaceutical and AI ads are all I see on prime now. It's madness.
2
Sirlacker 5 days ago +2
I heard that they play adverts louder so that you hear them when you get up and do something else whilst waiting for the adverts to finish and it makes so much sense.
2
agent_wolfe 5 days ago +2
We don’t get drug ads on Prime. Usually travel, shampoo/beauty products, laundry detergent, sometimes gambling.
2
Senna_65 5 days ago +2
Drug ads are one of the few I can sometimes tolerate solely for the side effects. The best was some Restless-Leg-Syndrome drug...no lie one of the side effects was "increased gambling tendencies"
2
bmwkid 5 days ago +2
Canada has them too but you’re not actually allowed to say what the drug does, just “ask your doctor” Not sure if that’s better or worse
2
Metroidman 5 days ago +2
Nah cause i dont watch them
2
yaboonabi 5 days ago +2
I do get irrationally mad at these. With all the info they collect on me, they could give better targeted ads. Mine are 60 p*******/ 30 online gambling/ 10 travelogue for a garbage state I’d never visit. 
2
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +2
This is what I'm saying. I get the worst ads directed at me that don't apply to me at all. If you want to show me gaming ads and sports ads fine, but I get a shitload of drug ads, insurance ads, and other c*** "Hey you! Do you want a new Subaru?" No "That's fine. Do you want to see a poorly sung Bon Jovi ad to insure your new Subaru?" I have no experience marketing or selling products to people but why do they throw random shit on the wall like this? It's like I'm being hit by a howitzer of irrelevant ads that don't apply to me.
2
Serious_Lettuce6716 5 days ago +2
I miss the anti-drug commercials. “You, alright? I learned it by watching you!” “This is your brain on drugs.”
2
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +2
The best were the TMNT anti-pot ads https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr67DI940Uk
2
snowwarrior 5 days ago +2
My socials are where the ads for medications I’ve never heard of and dont need or want reside. I’m looking at one typing this comment. 😂
2
aircooledJenkins 5 days ago +2
It's frustrating when I'm in a hotel and trying to watch TV. At home I don't watch TV, unless it's the Olympic Games. We only watch our own media collection.
2
ripper_14 5 days ago +2
Welcome to America.
2
Zauberer-IMDB 5 days ago +2
They're the only ones making money in this fucked up hellscape.
2
thrilling_me_softly 5 days ago +2
Hate them. They should have remained illegal 30 years ago.
2
pitrole 5 days ago +2
I mean the demographics that are still watching tv skew older, causing this type of advertisement to concentrate on tv instead of other venues. What’s the point of advertising some common consumer goods to this demographics anyways? New toothpaste, drink, snacks, detergents etc.. don’t work well with this demographics that why we are seeing them less on TV. All the major retailers are concentrating through mergers/acquisition no point putting out so many ads for them. Besides, everybody complains about the long list of side effect they have to speed up to go through during the ad, maybe complain about the regulations that’s causing this phenomenon, all the disclaimers just to have the plausible explanation of avoiding some liabilities.
2
AbbreviationsReal366 5 days ago +2
“Side effects include…..lower limb loss” Maybe lead with that?
2
kinisonkhan 5 days ago +2
What I find funny is Ro. Theres a ro pill for erectile dysfunction, theres a ro pill for losing weight. I assume there will be a ro pill to soften your stool. At some point SNL is going to need to make a sketch for this.
2
BrickPig 5 days ago +2
They do bother me, but not nearly as much as the all the ads for gambling apps. Maybe it's because the only time I watch live TV is for NHL games, but I find it genuinely disturbing how many gambling apps are out there, and how aggressively they're marketed.
2
Dreadwolf67 5 days ago +2
RFK said he was going to do something about them.
2
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +1
he's a fuckin liar
1
-haha-oh-wow- 5 days ago +2
Drug ads are so f****** gross. I can't stand them.
2
superdupermensch 5 days ago +2
No because rfk jr banned them. Right after he cured autism.
2
Randeth 5 days ago +2
I don't consume content with advertising any more. Your observation is a big part of why. But really all advertising has gotten out of hand.
2
txa1265 5 days ago +2
I'm just waiting to hear about AdVerta - the once monthly infusion when all of the pharma ads get to be just too much for you ... consult your marketing specialist to see if Adverta is right for you.
2
Competitive_Help8485 5 days ago +2
I haven't really noticed it myself. I feel like most days you'll see one or two each time commercials come on anyway.
2
phillytimd 5 days ago +2
I saw one yesterday for dog medicine shot like an Ozempic commercial
2
dfeeney95 5 days ago +2
I don’t understand why pharmaceutical companies pay the money to advertise a product I typically can not go out and buy. Do they really think my doctors is going to listen when I say “I saw a commercial for drug x on cnn and I want you to prescribe me that” I just don’t understand what benefit they get from spending so much money on advertising, it’s never made sense to me.
2
Boggie135 5 days ago +2
This always amazes me about American television
2
charlieyeswecan 5 days ago +2
I need to cancel prime. I’m not watching this propaganda bs.
2
Swiggy1957 5 days ago +2
It's to make up for the revenue networks lost when cigarette ads were banned. 😁 The big problem has always been that they didn't always say what the product is for. How many doctors here have had a patient ask about a medication that was not made for their gender. Imagine a 20-something guy asking his doctor about a post-menopausal hormone treatment.
2
x6ftundx 5 days ago +2
It's been that way forever, I remember seeing them and Y2K survival rations at the same time. Remember, the demographic doesn't change year after year. You eventually get to the point of needing them, and they never age out.
2
Naive_Confidence7297 5 days ago +2
Thankfully, my country has zero. I was so weirded out when in the US and they had ads for drugs. So odd. We just get prescribed exactly what we need by the medical professionals.
2
diecorporations 5 days ago +2
Who watches ads ? Mute them and change the channel.
2
myassholealt 5 days ago +2
I hate them too, but a fun way to pass the time when you can't skip it is try and spot all the phallic imagery they put in the erectile dysfunction commercials. There's one with a muscle car slowly coming out of a driveway, and if that doesn't scream a certain imagery, nothing will.
2
flynnsmom 5 days ago +2
YES! It’s one of the reasons the drugs are so expensive! It’s criminal! Wait…it’s not because of guess who…THE SACKLER FAMIKY!
2
Inevitable-Fix-3212 5 days ago +2
The government never should have started allowing Big Pharma or attorneys to make advertisements for television. Huge mistake for everyone except the advertisers.
2
FakeRealGirl 5 days ago +2
I've always wondered who these ads are for. It's not like I'm going to impulse buy gut-focused entivio, no matter how catchy the jingle is. Do enough people really ask their doctors about drugs they saw an ad for to make those ads worthwhile? Or are the ads aimed at someone other than the consumer, like maybe doctors? The structure of the ads, where they have to spend considerable run time describing often-horrible side effects, seems like it would make the ads a liability for the platform airing them, with a higher likelihood of people being made uncomfortable and changing the channel/app than an ad for just about anything else.
2
LRCM 5 days ago +2
[https://pi-hole.net/](https://pi-hole.net/) \+ [https://ublockorigin.com/](https://ublockorigin.com/)
2
sparklingvireo 4 days ago +2
I really don't know what most of them are treating. Sometimes I try to guess based on the trademark name. I'm guessing there's a law about it in Canada.
2
PocketNicks 4 days ago +2
I only ever see ads when watching live sports, and probably 80% of the ads are for betting/gambling websites. It's really annoying and predatory.
2
fothergillfuckup 4 days ago +2
Why do they advertise drugs you can't actually directly buy? Isn't the, er, qualified medical professional, supposed to prescribe medicine?
2
ZorakOfThatMagnitude 4 days ago +2
Not really.  The conditions they treat are so specific and the names are nonsensical enough that, combined with the visuals that have little to nothing to do with the product, make it some sort of AV test pattern or screen saver I don't mind missing while I'm cruising listnook, taking a bio break, snack break, etc.
2
Nunwithabadhabit 4 days ago +2
This is one of those cases where a little bit of personalization would go a long way. I do not have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. My time and their money is wasted marketing the treatment to me.
2
monchota 4 days ago +2
No, don't watch ads. You all should stop watching them too. Also is thisnone of those post to try and normalize watching ads? If its free, it can have ads, if you pay it should be sd free.
2
HumanDissentipede 4 days ago +2
My biggest mark of success is that I don’t have to watch any media with prescription drug ads.
2
TwoPercentTokes 5 days ago +4
Just wait until you find out they spend the vast majority of their budget on advertising, R&D and manufacturing are afterthoughts. We spend exorbitant amounts on drugs so they can market them back to us to spend more money on them.
4
bomilk19 5 days ago +2
Hit pause on the warning graphic sometimes. You’ll see something like “Patients who took Zeltreekuh lived an average of 5.4 months vs patients who took a placebo who lived 4.8 months”. Who doesn’t want to bankrupt their family to live two more weeks in agony?
2
adz568 5 days ago +2
Glad I don’t live in America
2
Sonichu- 5 days ago +1
You see ads?
1
Tafts_Bathtub 5 days ago +1
If you watched TV with an older viewing audience like the nightly national news, it has been like 80% pharmaceutical ads since I can remember in the 90s. The reason we’re seeing more pharmaceutical ads these days is probably because we’re getting older and watching shows older people watch.
1
itslikewoow 5 days ago +1
I never get tired of hearing about potential side effects between the a*** and genitals (looking at you Monjouro).
1
YuntHunter 5 days ago +1
Lucky you you're one of two countries in the world that does this.
1
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +1
Yes. All of them are reprehensible. Even the anime one. At least that one is good to look at stylistically. But they all follow the same plot. Overly cheerful people doing shit normal people don't do, while a voiceover asks if you have a symptom you never heard of in your life. "Do you have **tardive dyskenesia**" "Do you have **Pieronie's disease**" Then they implore you to "ask a doctor about Tremfydant" or whatever medication they are shilling. But not after informing you of the possible side effects of **death**, **vomiting**, nausea, oxidation, manifestation, diarrhea, and gas. Listen, it's quite possible that even if you could even afford the medication or had insurance, you might be "helped" by whatever. And I'm not naive, peptides like "GLP-1" and Wegovy with happy cheerful singing people singing off-brand covers of 70's pop hits ("Let's groooovveee tonight!") may help some people lose weight, but overall, if you're not feeling well, go to a doctor, and let him prescribe drugs to treat your ailments. You should not "ask your doctor" about any drug at ALL that you saw on TV. This, and political ads, are the two most reviled ads I see. When Youtube shows me them I actively rush to my computer to block and report them as soon as I physically am possible. /rant
1
gdmfsoabrb 5 days ago +1
I've seen a couple recently where, buried in the list of horrific side effects, is a disclaimer that studies are ongoing to prove the drug's effectiveness. So now they're selling pills that might not even help with the issue they're telling us about.
1
ModernWarBear 5 days ago +1
I wish we had laws against it like other countries do.
1
breakfastbenedict 5 days ago +1
Welcome to America 
1
Well_Socialized 5 days ago +1
I'm always amazed by that when I visit someone's house who watches TV with commercials.
1
SBABakaMajorPayne 5 days ago +1
every week it's about 3 new ones too. Along with the fact that the advertisements for drugs are every other commercial.
1
bynaryum 5 days ago +1
Super frustrated. They take up 80-90% of ad space on Hulu which is gross. We’re back to the point where we mute ads and leave the room for a minute.
1
ukexpat 5 days ago +1
*Don’t take dibubblipeptide if you’re allergic to dibubblipeptide.*
1
nimbuscloud9 5 days ago +1
A mostly American problem
1
JingoboStoplight4887 5 days ago +1
No
1
silentwind262 5 days ago +1
Capitalism run rampant. I think we’re the only country that allows this.
1
Mundane-Area6067 4 days ago +1
I hear a lot of doctors say that patients are constantly asking them for the drugs they see on tv so the stupid incessant advertising must work.
1
thetatershaveeyes 4 days ago +1
On some post asking international folks about culture shocks they experienced in the US, I said prescription drug adverts, and things got pretty heated. For whatever reason, there are a lot of Americans who will defend to the death their god-given right to watch prescription drug ads on tv.
1
darthjoey91 4 days ago +1
The only way it's going down is if we get Congress to ban it like they did smoking adverts. So it's never going down.
1
greenufo333 4 days ago +1
Don't watch tv
1
Glass_Ad9489 4 days ago +1
Definitely!!
1
Uvtha- 3 days ago +1
The depression meds ads are fascinating.  The core message is always that the depression is always looming, even with the medication.  There's one where there's like a sunny town on the edge of a dark cliff, the one where the lady carry around the "mask" she used to hide her depression in her purse.  I think there was one where it was a little cartoon guy that followed the actor around. All the actors were clearly given the direction "you are coping, but the depression is still there".  The lady in the mask one is so good at acting like she's empty inside, it's crazy. There's a good YouTube video essay going over these just waiting to be made.
1
JDz84 3 days ago +1
I tend to zone out on most commercials, but apparently my 8 y/o pays enough attention that she asked her allergist about Neffy at her appointment last week. 🤦🏼‍♀️
1
UnnamedStaplesDrone 3 days ago +1
If you’re allergic to ebglyss, don’t take ebglyss! You don’t say??? How many people have these fuckin diseases? Like 1% of the population?
1
the_talented_liar 3 days ago +1
Part of it is that people in the States tend to ignore symptoms due to our miserable healthcare system so for every thousand people who will ignore the ad one person may go “huh, that’s a thing and there’s a treatment?”. The sane answer is to only get advice from medical professionals but if you’re not going to the doctor’s in the first place you may not ever have the opportunity.
1
mikayd 3 days ago +1
Same here man, I’ll add those HIV drug commercials, you know the one that promotes unsafe life styles and says the HIV can be undetectable! Who the heck wants to hide HIV! Like it should even be allowed. I don’t understand it
1
Realistic-Try-8029 2 days ago +1
I’m from Australia and was (still am) astounded at the number of ads for prescription medication airing in the US.
1
Electrical-Wasabi137 23 hr ago +1
Billy mays here.
1
RonWill79 5 days ago +1
I don’t see ads. 🏴‍☠️
1
bnuuug 5 days ago +1
Nope they're really fun, especially if they list the side effects before saying what the medicine is designed to treat. Then I can go "damn this shit better cure AIDs and double my d*** size" I think the last one ended up being for congestive heart failure
1
Notorious2again 5 days ago +1
*may cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, spontaneous erections, and congestive heart failure
1
unfamiliarjoe 5 days ago +1
It’s only in the US and it’s disgusting. Plus all the celebrities peddling. You don’t see this in Canada or Europe.
1
piscikeeper 5 days ago +1
I think New Zealand allows it also. Two out of the entire planet should say something.
1
HowardBunnyColvin 5 days ago +1
US and NZ. But yeah whenever I watch Korean TV they openly advertise beer commercials and even AI and I love it. But US commercials, ugh...
1
unfamiliarjoe 5 days ago +2
Yeah I watch more Canada TV when I can. I really feel bad for people because it’s targeted marketing that is clearly working.
2
BenTramer 5 days ago +1
No. Who pays attention/watches commercials?
1
Jmazoso 5 days ago +1
I report all listnook, YouTube etc drug ads as misleading
1
1ndomitablespirit 5 days ago +1
They pay for advertising to influence the networks.
1
RaisedByBooksNTV 5 days ago +1
And food. We eat more b/c of all those commercials. But those medicine commercials are one of the reasons the prescriptions cost so much. I hate them. I hate healthcare in the US.
1
OppositeRun6503 5 days ago +1
American political opinion programming networks that once called themselves the cable news media rely on seniors as their target demographic audience and as a result that demographic is also big pharma's target demographic audience as well so the majority of the advertising on these networks is from big pharma.
1
ilovebeetrootalot 4 days ago +1
Why are you watching ads?
1
← Back to Board