· 200 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 28, 2026 at 2:16 PM

Are there sequels to films where the cliffhanger at the end of the previous film was ignored?

Posted by RealHippyTheFrog


Are there sequels to films where the cliffhanger at the end of the previous film was ignored? I ask this out of curiosity and because of me having some film rewrite of a bad film (or what I consider to be a bad film) going on in my head. I won't say what said bad film is as I do not want it to distract from getting an answer to my question (as I, like anyone else, have not watched every film under the sun).

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Bunister Mar 28, 2026 +859
Nobody in Grease 2 ever makes any reference to the day two students left the prom in a flying car.
859
BrisYamaha Mar 28, 2026 +129
I’m upvoting you for knowing this. So you’re the person that watched Grease 2!
129
Sly_Wood Mar 29, 2026 +16
Grease 2 is f****** amazing bro. Michelle phifer…
16
captainxenu Mar 29, 2026 +28
That wasn't the prom, that was just some end of school fair.
28
Accomplished-City484 Mar 28, 2026 +98
The flying car was a metaphor for them dying in a car accident because they drive like idiots
98
sth128 Mar 28, 2026 +51
They would have lived if not for the grease catching fire from lightning and burning the two alive.
51
bluejester12 Mar 28, 2026 +1156
The first Shazam movie had an end credits scene showing Mr. Mind introducing himself to Dr. Sivana. The sequel completely ignored these characters.
1156
dordonot Mar 28, 2026 +360
And the sequel had the exact same end credits scene
360
Netsforex_ Mar 28, 2026 +178
That one felt insulting tbh. Like through the entirety of the gods coming back and tearing apart the city to get Shazam's powers, the two big-bads were just...chatting in their cell?
178
NoobFreakT Mar 28, 2026 +131
I thought it was a joke, especially since it was clear there wouldn’t be a third film, so the joke was that they’re still trying to get out of the cell
131
UnbuiltIkeaBookcase Mar 28, 2026 +70
I thought it was a pretty good joke personally.  the logic of Mr Mind explaining it takes him a long time to get places cause of the lack of legs and wings *does* actually makes sense 😅
70
NoobFreakT Mar 28, 2026 +28
Yeah I can't believe a lot of people didn't understand it. I didn't like the movie very much but that scene gave me a laugh
28
Crater_Raider Mar 28, 2026 +51
Technically it wasn’t completely ignored as they did address it in the following post credit squence.
51
ProfessorEtc Mar 28, 2026 +16
They're going for the record with World's Longest Serial
16
david_why Mar 28, 2026 +417
They also completely left out Sinbad
417
jarvisesdios Mar 28, 2026 +235
The monster that tortured Dennis Reynolds with Rob Thomas?
235
CauliflowerGreen214 Mar 28, 2026 +52
Hit him with your shoe!!
52
Keepitbrockmire Mar 28, 2026 +37
This Sinbad 🏡
37
HawkmoonsCustoms Mar 28, 2026 +25
“Sing a song! Shut up!”
25
Wooden-Criticism-167 Mar 28, 2026 +14
Beat his testicles!
14
lilbiggs Mar 28, 2026 +15
That first movie pretty much adapts the new 52 Shazam story that was a backup in justice league down to that post credits scene being the last page in the story. Only thing not adapted was any of the black Adam stuf. i don’t even think that page was followed up in any comics either
15
froderick Mar 28, 2026 +337
End of X-Men: Days of Future Past. Past Wolverine is recovered from the harbour and taken into custody by Striker, which is demonstrated at that moment to be Mystique in disguise. So you think oh.. maybe Wolverine never becomes Weapon X and his past changes? Nope. Next movie Apocalypse and friends make off with Xaiver, so the crew has to go get him. But their jet was blown up during the whole affair, so they need an excuse to get a new one. Real-Striker shows up, they abduct some of our main cast back to the Weapon X facility, where Wolverine gets set loose to kill everyone so the heroes can take *Striker CO's* jet to replace their old one. The whole sequence is a detour just to shoe-horn Wolverine into the movie, when the cliffhanger from the previous movie leads us to believe that in the changed timeline Striker never gets his hands on Wolverine in the first place (which ended up still happening anyway).
337
DaveyTaco Mar 28, 2026 +146
This is actually a perfect answer to the question. It’s a cliff hanger which gets completely ignored and is rendered completely meaningless in the next film.
146
TipTup85 Mar 29, 2026 +28
The only part of DOFP I hated was the Mystique eyes. Could have just been Stryker and carried on
28
ConstantRefills Mar 29, 2026 +13
That was the original ending https://youtu.be/TUSw27WijlA?si=3JmckWu-KRyz3HfW
13
JohnnyJayce Mar 28, 2026 +848
Dominic Toretto showing up in Tokyo Drift was ignored for multiple movies. They just straight up soft rebooted the timeline because people loved Han so much.
848
Mr_Wobble_PNW Mar 28, 2026 +241
Not cliffhanger, but the way they brought back the Japanese dude after blowing him up was great. I think in the timeline they try to suggest that Tokyo drift took place between 5 or 6 canonically, but then that would mean that they're drifting old cars and using flip phones in between 5+6 lol
241
BeserKing Mar 28, 2026 +154
It’s actually between 6 and 7, with the villain of 7 now retroactively responsible for Han’s death
154
PIEROXMYSOX1 Mar 28, 2026 +147
Except it wasn’t his death after all, he just faked it and then showed back up again in 9
147
ponderingcamel Mar 28, 2026 +125
God I love these movies.
125
Vittulima Mar 28, 2026 +39
Fantastic drinking game movies. I've got totally obliterated trying to watch Fast X lmao
39
TBroomey Mar 28, 2026 +58
Tokyo Drift is set in 2015 in order for the timeline to work and that is hilarious.
58
three-sense Mar 28, 2026 +21
Yeah I remember seeing F7 and then the good guy from Tokyo Drift shows up and he’s like 38 lol. It’s so bad it’s good lol
21
m0viestar Mar 28, 2026 +9
The Korean Japanese dude.  
9
Pacman_Frog Mar 28, 2026 +317
I still love that Han showed up, alive, no explanation. And everyone just went with it.
317
BeserKing Mar 28, 2026 +128
They did kinda explain it tbf, Mr Nowhere was involved somehow
128
Shakespeare257 Mar 28, 2026 +90
Mr Nobody lol
90
BeserKing Mar 28, 2026 +38
yeah that guy lmao
38
TravelerSearcher Mar 28, 2026 +61
Wasn't it explained as Tokyo Drift taking place much later in the timeline than when it was released? Like Han shows up in the main movies after, then at some point the events of Tokyo Drift happen, then they have a reveal later that his death was faked. I just looked up the fandom wiki: the first movie takes place in 2004, Tokyo Drift is in *2014* after the events *Fast and Furious 6* and before *Furious 7*. Han returns in the ninth movie, explaining how he went into hiding. Admittedly it's a lot of twisted explanations after the fact. The whole franchise is just dumb rule of cool for the most part.
61
Vundal Mar 28, 2026 +82
FF franchise is a modded d&d campaign with cars. By the newer movies they are pulling off super hero moves.
82
CommissarThrace Mar 28, 2026 +18
It's actually a Chronicles of Darkness campaign. Dom is clearly an Acanthus, a mage whose primary arcane are Time and Fate. Manipulating luck and rewinding time are the only explanations for him surviving so many unlikely events.
18
nomorecannibalbirds Mar 28, 2026 +17
Yes, because the phones and cars and style of Tokyo Drift scream 2014
17
JohnnyJayce Mar 28, 2026 +18
Yeah, Tokyo Drift takes place before Fast 7. I wonder how pissed Lucas Black was about them having Vin Diesel as a cliffhanger in his movie and Black probably thought he'll be replacing Paul Walker in the next one but it took them almost 10 years to bring him back again for a minute long cameo lol
18
HUGO-THE-BEAR Mar 28, 2026 +8
Lucas Black did have a bigger role in furious 8 I think? Maybe it was 9? Possibly 10 as well lol.
8
defiancy Mar 28, 2026 +46
I mean personally I think Tokyo Drift is probably the best FF movie after the first one and to me might even be better. Lower stakes, focuses on actual racing etc.
46
Amon7777 Mar 28, 2026 +43
The first FF was a remake of Point Break. Tokyo Drift was a racing movie. Everything that came after was a superhero where their cars were their super powers.
43
dakilazical_253 Mar 28, 2026 +30
Tokyo Drift was a Karate Kid remake with car racing
30
orangeflava Mar 28, 2026 +13
The undercover cop plot infiltrating a gang of car thieves is basically the 80s movie "No Man's Land' with Charlie Sheen who would be the dom in this scenario. The undercover becomes infatuated with the lifestyle and even falls in love with his sister just like in fast and furious!
13
gumby_twain Mar 28, 2026 +15
Tokyo Drift is the only one I can rewatch. It’s just so fun, doesn’t take itself seriously at all. Most of all, it has one of the best lines in cinematic history. You’re not in control, unless you’re out of control.
15
Halfangel_Manusdei Mar 28, 2026 +365
The postcredit to Doctor Strange teases Morbo as a villain... and he never came back (except in an alternate universe)
365
Hyxenflay7737_4565 Mar 28, 2026 +174
They briefly say something like, "He dedicated his life to trying to kill me." And never showed any of these attempts in any form.
174
greg225 Mar 28, 2026 +143
Would love to see a montage of him showing up in really mundane situations trying to kill Strange, like "surprise m***********!"  Strange gets in a taxi and Mordo is the driver, Strange goes on a Tinder date and it turns out to be Mordo, Strange goes to put the trash out and Mordo jumps out of the bin as he opens it.
143
JesusStarbox Mar 28, 2026 +47
And he says "It's Mordoring time!"
47
Calvin_Hobbes124 Mar 28, 2026 +172
I know you meant Mordo but I can’t help but hope Morbo from futurama is in the next one
172
Halfangel_Manusdei Mar 28, 2026 +15
Oh c***, you're right XD
15
LebowskiVoodoo Mar 28, 2026 +16
ALTERNATE UNIVERSES DON'T WORK THAT WAY! GOODNIGHT!
16
Bing_Bong_the_Archer Mar 28, 2026 +46
Morbo is amused by the puny humans
46
PornoPaul Mar 28, 2026 +20
I read that a deleted scene from MoM had Mordo catching up to Scarlett Witch super early on, and hes all badass, and she immediately kills him.
20
PlasmaDiffusion Mar 28, 2026 +402
Prometheus kinda. Elizabeth Shaw wants to visit the Engineers home planet for answers but a true sequel never happened. Instead we got Alien Covenant where halfway through the movie there is an attempted follow up except David dumps the Engineer's own deadly black goo pathogen on them all, killing them and making them barely important. It's technically a follow up but a really lame half assed one lol
402
PocketBuckle Mar 28, 2026 +264
Plus, having Shaw be killed off-screen and having the new characters discover her mutilated corpse is a real disservice.
264
PlasmaDiffusion Mar 28, 2026 +134
Yeah especially that. She got the Hicks and Newt treatment except at least they didn't get teased for a sequel like she did 🫠
134
samx3i Mar 28, 2026 +31
It's funny that Alien³ and Covenant have both been brought up on this thread for the same reasons. I feel like Romulus won't get the follow up it needs either.
31
DraculasDog Mar 29, 2026 +9
Nero is currently traveling through time to prevent the follow up to Romulus.
9
samx3i Mar 29, 2026 +14
I enjoyed Romulus, but it felt more like fan tribute than its own movie or a meaningful part of the franchise. I sometimes think we'd be better off if Alien & Aliens were the only ones ever made. They're such a perfect one-two punch.
14
Shas_Erra Mar 28, 2026 +29
A lot of the leaks from filming showed a Xenomorph and a Neomorph fighting each other and they cut it entirely from the final film
29
rechambers Mar 28, 2026 +392
The Resident Evil movies just skip past or retcon whatever happened in the previous movie in almost every single iteration. Paul W S Anderson flat out just did not care about any lore (I say this as a major fan of the games who still enjoyed the first movie quite a bit despite its lack of faith to the source material as well as each of the sequels if nothing more than mindless action for 2 hours)
392
Oerwinde Mar 28, 2026 +189
Yeah, I like the big reveal of a big clone army of Alices, and they all die in the first 2 minutes of the next movie.
189
perpetuumD Mar 28, 2026 +48
There was a thread here a few months ago where the OP asked the same question and put every Resident Evil movie as example of such trope
48
Fuselier Mar 28, 2026 +6
Would love to see that thread if you have it readily available. I am searching now and will link if I find it.
6
perpetuumD Mar 28, 2026 +8
[this comment links it](https://www.listnook.com/r/movies/s/R5mWwwI3aW)
8
failedartistmtl Mar 28, 2026 +18
Look as someone who played RE3 a lot at the time, i was so excited about Matt becoming Nemesis! I thought it would have made a great villain dynamic.
18
Moon_Beans1 Mar 28, 2026 +37
I like how Resident Evil Extinction can't even wait till it's own conclusion to retcon itself. Start of the movie - The zombie virus has dried up all the earth's water... Somehow. End of the movie - It's pouring with rain in Japan. I guess Alice punched the villain so hard she made it rain again?
37
zekthegeke Mar 28, 2026 +36
I thought the rainy Tokyo outbreak scene at the end of Extinction was actually a setup for the Umbrella-controlled underground simulation environments that are disclosed in the next movie, and actually a rare example of follow-through.
36
Th3_Hegemon Mar 28, 2026 +9
Maybe (though you're forgetting After Life, the movie in between those two), but regardless the oceans are back in all the subsequent movies.
9
Moon_Beans1 Mar 28, 2026 +11
Pretty much. I never understood the necessity of doing the "virus dried up the water" plot point anyway given it was set in Vegas. In any post apocalypse scenario Vegas will revert to desert, you don't need a virus to cause that lol
11
mofohank Mar 28, 2026 +99
On the plus side, Bill Murray was well s***, running around, high kicking and shooting zombies. Edit: I see you sneakily edited Wes Anderson to Paul WS Anderson to spoil my otherwise impeccable joke :(
99
occupy_westeros Mar 28, 2026 +34
The second to last Resident Evil movie(Retribution?) ends on such a killer shot, all the characters standing on top of the White House as the camera pans out to reveal they're surrounded by a hilarious amount of monsters. They were setting up to do a siege movie, it would have been awesome. But then the final movie starts and they're like "Yeah, they all died." Bummer.
34
UsernamesAllTaken69 Mar 28, 2026 +8
This was the first thing that came to mind for me. Even touting the next one as the final movie. Combine that with the insane final shot of the previous movie and we were set for the biggest dumbest movie of the biggest dumbest franchise. Then we got robbed and the final movie just skipped the part we all wanted.
8
EscapeSeventySeven Mar 28, 2026 +19
No no that’s his Jim Jaurmusch film: the dead don’t die
19
nojugglingever Mar 28, 2026 +32
As a Resident Evil fan of 28 years, I always enjoyed that the movies matched the video games in that the plot was dumb and unsatisfying to follow, but in a totally different way. Like they went a totally different direction and still ended up at the same location (don't think too much about the plot/previous installments).
32
red23011 Mar 28, 2026 +249
Not a film but the 1980s show Sledge Hammer had the main character accidentally setting off a nuclear bomb while trying to disarm it at the end of the first season. This was done because the people in charge of the show believed that it wouldn't be renewed for a second season. And then it was renewed by the network. The second season started with a message stating that the following episodes took place 5 years before the nuclear explosion.
249
snackofalltrades Mar 28, 2026 +102
Reminds me of 24 setting off a nuke in Los Angeles, then never mentioning it again.
102
Ripe_Tomato Mar 28, 2026 +32
The infamous suitcase nukes. Then Jack Killed poor Curtis for nothing
32
kirin-rex Mar 28, 2026 +41
Ah yes, Sledgehammer: The Early Years.
41
Flurb4 Mar 28, 2026 +9
And the show still referenced things that happened in the first season. I loved it.
9
lWishItWastheWeekend Mar 28, 2026 +360
I always thought it was weird how at the end of 1997’s I Know What You Did Last Summer, the last scene is Jennifer Love Hewitt in college after everything has happened and seemingly living a normal life. She goes to shower and the words “I Know” are written on the steamed glass and someone crashes through the glass, attacking her right as the end credits pop up.
360
monty_kurns Mar 28, 2026 +349
At least in the second one she mentions is briefly as a recurring dream. Kind of a hand wave dismissal of it, but kind of hard to use that as a plot point to pick up from.
349
Carnivile Mar 28, 2026 +78
Isn't the dream fake out a common horror ending trope anyway?
78
monty_kurns Mar 28, 2026 +47
It is, but it’s usually made clear right when it happens. I don’t think they were planning for a sequel so they just did what they wanted for a final jump scare with no explanation needed. When they made the second, they probably just used the dream excuse as a way to not have to deal with it.
47
Drelas_Hawke Mar 28, 2026 +23
"Don't think too hard about it" is a recurring theme of the second movie. Both movies honestly, but even more so the second.
23
GuybrushThreepwood99 Mar 28, 2026 +28
And then they did it again with the sequel. I still know what you did last summer ends with her being pulled under a bed, and the legacy sequel that just came out had no mention of that at all.
28
thxxx1337 Mar 28, 2026 +94
At the end of Insidious, 2 I think, Elise sees something that terrifies her to her very core... Series goes to 5 films and we still don't know what it was.
94
ConorYEAH Mar 28, 2026 +111
It was probably like a ghost, or somethin.
111
thxxx1337 Mar 28, 2026 +38
You know what... You should work for Blumhouse
38
AnnieTheThird Mar 28, 2026 +394
A lot of post-Endgame MCU movies have some huge implications in their ending, or some big reveal in the post-credits scene, that just doesn't get acknowledged at all in later movies
394
ToxicBanana69 Mar 28, 2026 +81
I’m still annoyed that Arishem appearing in the sky at the end of Eternals didn’t even get a background easter egg or anything in following films. Like, no matter how crazy day-to-day life in the MCU is, a giant being bigger than Earth appearing put of nowhere, kidnapping people, then disappearing through a black hole should be on the front page of every news article.
81
tarrach Mar 28, 2026 +123
Most of them haven't had any continuation yet though, so there hasn't been much storyline ignoring the ending/post-credit
123
kkngs Mar 28, 2026 +122
I think a lot of that was abandoning their plans around using Kang as the next main villain.
122
neoblackdragon Mar 28, 2026 +32
Most of it was to set up some Avengers multiverse conflict. While Antman was specifically for Kang and that's going nowhere. The others were vague enough they can conclude it all with Doomsday. Still a far cry from Phase 1 where each post credits or ending is addressed in some way in the next. Though Hulks ending was basically undone in a short because they didn't want Stark to have been approved for the Avengers as per IM2..........which mean not one thing come Avengers. Eternals? Wtf knows if that's ever going to be addressed.
32
ghotier Mar 28, 2026 +80
I can't wait to never find out about the 10 rings.
80
Kimantha_Allerdings Mar 28, 2026 +60
Right? Shang-Chi is one of the best post Phase 3 films, and they seem to have basically abandoned it entirely
60
Jonaskin83 Mar 28, 2026 +43
I can’t wait to never see Charlize Theron or Harry Styles characters again or even have them mentioned
43
Val_Killsmore Mar 28, 2026 +13
A division of the Ten Rings were responsible for kidnapping Tony Stark in Iron Man also. We finally get a movie that revolved around them and it seems that they were never brought up again after Shang-Chi. Shang-Chi, himself, hasn't shown up since. They also said the Rings were sending a signal somewhere, right? Did we ever find out where it was sending a signal to?
13
N8CCRG Mar 28, 2026 +32
That's always been the process for the MCU. End with a bunch of loose threads and someone later looks back and decides to pick up a couple of them. It's not something new or different post-Endgame, it's just that they finally tied off the ones from Infinity War because there's been more time (see, The Leader finally getting tied off 17 years later). Edit: In fact if we're limiting ourselves strictly to sequels from OP's question, none of the Multiverse Saga movies have had a sequel yet. Spider-Man: Brand New Day is going to be the first one.
32
mggirard13 Mar 28, 2026 +46
Dr. Strange ended with Mordo going bad/rogue and killing off sorcerers but he only reappeared in Multiverse of Madness for like five minutes as a villain in that one other universe. 616 Mordo should still be running around offing sorcerers.
46
z4guy Mar 28, 2026 +12
Yep, 616 Mordo shoulda been there with Wanda having a field day on all the sorcerers in Kamar-Taj
12
train153 Mar 28, 2026 +8
They actually did almost use that plot thread. Sam Raimi apparently was going to have a sequence in the beginning of Multiverse of Madness of Mordo fighting Wanda. It got cut because it slowed to the beginning of the movie too much.
8
N8CCRG Mar 28, 2026 +6
Yes, there are still some loose threads from the Infinity Saga too that get lost/dropped.
6
muad_dibs Mar 28, 2026 +8
Which ones?
8
InvestigatorLast578 Mar 28, 2026 +61
Well any with a Kang scene for starters. Like the third Ant-man and Wasp. 
61
deadowl Mar 28, 2026 +57
They should have just recast the dude.
57
jawndell Mar 28, 2026 +37
Yup, it’s a comic book movie.  Recasting a character is so easy to explain.  Like, oops this dude is the actual multiverse Kang, all those other ones were just replicas or from timelines that didn’t matter, that’s why they were easily beat. 
37
feartheoldblood90 Mar 28, 2026 +15
They already recast James Rhodes without even acknowledging it, they could have done it again lol
15
Jonaskin83 Mar 28, 2026 +17
They could have done something really funny and recast Terence Howard as Kang.
17
DCDHermes Mar 28, 2026 +22
They kind of dealt with it by having Rhodey’s first line in Iron Man 2 be “Look, it’s me, I’m here. Deal with it, let’s move on.”
22
SometimesILieToo Mar 28, 2026 +7
And with baby Reed introduced it woulda been nothing to switch his “origin” to that Kang.
7
MrCanoe Mar 28, 2026 +7
It wouldn't be even hard, they literally did it with The Mandarin. "Oh hey that guy we said was the The Mandarin? turns out he was an actor paid to play The Mandarin. This is the real one"
7
SometimesILieToo Mar 28, 2026 +16
A mulitiversal character with different skins?! Preposterous!
16
busstamove14 Mar 28, 2026 +10
This reads like a Dennis Reynolds quote
10
Astrium6 Mar 28, 2026 +5
Disney hasn’t thought of the smell.
5
Godzilla_Fan Mar 28, 2026 +35
Should’ve been Giancarlo Esposito in that role instead of wasting him in Brave New World
35
OrangeVoxel Mar 28, 2026 +10
That was resolved in Loki season 2. Though not a movie, so it does still qualify for OPs question
10
92tilinfinityand Mar 28, 2026 +28
The Eternals, both Doctor Stranges
28
Kimantha_Allerdings Mar 28, 2026 +7
Shang-Chi
7
DizzyLead Mar 28, 2026 +11
*Doctor Strange* is one.
11
Mr_Noh Mar 28, 2026 +16
Pre-Endgame, the stinger from the first Avengers movie comes to mind. Hint at the comic storyline for the Infinity Gauntlet of Thanos trying to woo Death (as in the literal embodiment of death), then in the next film turn Thanos into some lame Malthusian a-hole.
16
JoshOliday Mar 28, 2026 +13
I think they felt that personified Death would have been too unbelievable... Nevermind the fact that they ended up going thru with it in Agatha All Along anyway, but arguably she fits in better there.
13
TrueOrPhallus Mar 28, 2026 +126
Not a movie but trueblood always ended episodes like that and then started the next episode right after what you expected to be the climax which seemed to always turn into a nothing burger
126
Jonaskin83 Mar 28, 2026 +138
It’s like in Goosebumps books. A chapter ends with something like “and then I felt an icy cold hand around my neck!” And then the next one will start with “I turned around and saw my little sister holding a can of cola she’d just gotten from the fridge. ‘Honestly protagonist, you’re such a scaredy cat!’ she said.”
138
Chainsmadeinlife Mar 28, 2026 +12
I remember these! I loved them as a kid they were my favourite book. My mum once busted me at about 1am still reading, had my lamp taken away for a week or something. Anyway now that you say it yeh they h******* did cliffhangers with poor explanations every chapter.
12
DudeUnduli Mar 28, 2026 +15
That was weirdly one of my favourite things about True Blood. Eventually there were so many characters with their own stories going on that the first half of an episode was catching upon all the cliffhangers from the previous episode. Then the second half was just cliffhangers and it would just repeat till the last episode tied most things up. It kinda felt like you watched episode one then the second half of episode one and the first half of two then the second half of two and the first half of three and so on.
15
RuleNine Mar 28, 2026 +126
Growing up, my favorite thing in the whole world was to go to the movies on Saturday afternoons for the chapter plays. Cliffhangers. They also called them serials. My favorite was Rocketman, and once it was a no-brakes chapter. The bad guy stuck him in a car on a mountain road and knocked him out and welded the door shut and tore out the brakes and started him to his death, and he woke up and tried to steer and tried to get out but the car went off a cliff before he could escape! And it crashed and burned and I was so upset and excited! The next week, you better believe I was first in line. And they always start with the end of the last week. And there was Rocketman, trying to get out, and here comes the cliff, and just before the car went off the cliff, he jumped free! And all the kids cheered! But I didn't cheer. I stood right up and started shouting. This isn't what happened last week! Have you all got amnesia?? They just cheated us! This isn't fair! HE DIDN'T GET OUT OF THE COCKADOODIE CAR!
126
Mobsey Mar 28, 2026 +30
You're my #1 fan, you say?
30
Educational_Sky_1136 Mar 28, 2026 +18
I get that reference.
18
Edthelayman Mar 28, 2026 +14
This was my first thought upon hearing the question.
14
JJNitrofan3944 Mar 28, 2026 +14
Love the Stephen King reference.
14
powerstride96 Mar 28, 2026 +32
All the Resident Evil films are pretty famous for this.
32
MoobyTheGoldenSock Mar 28, 2026 +34
Terminator did this with both Salvation and Genisys. Heck, the entire *films* were ignored. And the films ignored the tv series' cliffhanger (and continuity) as well.
34
Mike_R_5 Mar 28, 2026 +59
Smokey & the Bandit. The end of the first one sets up a sequel perfectly. It ends with the start of the clam chowder run. They completely ignore it and instead wrote a sequel about and elephant and Bandit’s drinking problem. Yes. I’m still bitter
59
Fickle_Alternative_ Mar 28, 2026 +170
The end of 28 Weeks Later shows a horde of infected running towards the Eiffel Tower (showing the virus has escaped England and made it to mainland Europe). The very beginning of 28 Years Later shows text onscreen that says “the virus was able to be pushed back to England”. So I guess that doesn’t count as ignoring the cliffhanger as they did address it, but no explanation how, just not at all interested in the premise of having the virus be on the mainland.
170
Upbeat_Tension_8077 Mar 28, 2026 +81
I think Danny Boyle in an interview basically said that in his canon, Paris got nuked
81
Linenoise77 Mar 28, 2026 +35
That doesn't make a ton of sense though. If it is now viewed as an existential threat to humanity and you are willing to go scorched earth on continental Europe to fight it back, and do so successfully......why do you just let the UK be after that and trust that you can contain it? Especially after it already was able to break quarantine once. You could just have guys in choppers hop over from france and pluck off anything that moved so you don't risk leaving a reservoir. Yeah it would take a long time, but this is 28 YEARS later.
35
The420thOfJuly Mar 28, 2026 +8
Which I think is a pretty reasonable response to the rage virus going mainland. They had to shut that shit down ASAP.
8
JosefMcLovin Mar 28, 2026 +31
I think this is because 28 days later and 28 weeks later are owned by two different companies, so 28 years later is a sequel to 28 days later, not 28 weeks later
31
fading_stars Mar 28, 2026 +26
Can't believe this was so far down the list! It almost feels as if all the canon established in Weeks, that there could be a form of immunity, that the virus spread to Europe etc. is completely disregarded 
26
Azidamadjida Mar 28, 2026 +26
Not necessarily a cliffhanger, but a HUGE plot point that got completely ignored was in Underworld: Rise of the Lycans. There’s an entire plot in the first one that revolves around the brand the werewolves get when they’re enslaved by the vampires - they literally show the skin with the brand on it taken off Michael Sheens character and they’ve stored it in one of their history books and this was used as evidence that his character was dead. It’s literally the reason why nobody believes Kate Beckinsale when she says he’s alive because hey, we’ve got his skin showing the brand on display. In the sequel? No brand. And they show him shirtless for like half the movie. None of the werewolves have the brand. And no, it’s not like it was somewhere else on his body, like his ass or something, because 1) they show that too, and 2) they specifically say it was on his arm in the first movie. It was always weird to me that this was such a major plot point in the first movie and completely ignored in the sequel
26
BunsenHoneydewsEyes Mar 28, 2026 +346
Not really a cliffhanger, but Alien 3 essentially renders the climax and ending of Aliens useless. You spend the second half of Aliens getting the kid to safety and in the span of the opening credits of the next movie she and Hicks are dead. Such a f****** waste. 
346
sharrrper Mar 28, 2026 +148
Honestly I think this is at least 80% of why Alien 3 is considered bad. It opens by shitting all over one of the greatest movies ever made. The rest of the movie is generally pretty good if you ask me though certainly not without flaws, but just that puts such a bad taste in your mouth right out of the gate that it never has a chance. Similarly, Rise of Skywalker is terrible for many reasons, but opening with "It was Palpatine all along!" just undercuts all the struggles of the entire original trilogy. The movie really has no chance after that. (Continuing to fall on it's face every step of the way for the full runtime also doesn't help, but it was doomed with that opening)
148
blackstafflo Mar 28, 2026 +21
What frustrates me the most, is it would have been so easy to simply have two escape pods, and only the one with Ripley and the droid falling and crashing, while the other is just said to have been rescued in space out of screen.
21
TheConqueror74 Mar 28, 2026 +46
Alien 3 is a really solid film that just has the misfortune of following up two of the best of all time. They really didn’t help themselves by killing Newt and Hicks off screen right at the start. Whoever okayed that idea should’ve been fired. Worst decision in the movie.
46
Jonaskin83 Mar 28, 2026 +17
Even with the trailers bringing back Palpatine being a bit of a cop out, I was prepared to go into Rise of Skywalker giving it the benefit of the doubt. I threw that out as soon as I read “The Dead Speak!” in the opening crawl.
17
GeekAesthete Mar 28, 2026 +117
In a similar vein, The Force Awakens really deflates the end of Return of the Jedi, telling us that after the rebels defeated the Empire, the First Order quickly stepped in and returned the galaxy to the same status quo.
117
Humblebee89 Mar 28, 2026 +73
I really can't express my amazement at how badly they fucked up what should have been an easy slam dunk with the sequels.
73
GregBahm Mar 28, 2026 +12
Yeah I've always been baffled at why nobody stopped this at the "story outline" phase. There are all these hard parts to movies (casting, dialog, on-screen chemistry) but the story outline should have been super easy. If you just write down what happens in the story in \~4 or 5 sentences, anyone reading those sentences should be able to say "Wow this story is c***. We should change it to a better story."
12
Isolated_Hippo Mar 28, 2026 +10
In some ways I liked the concept actually. You defeat the leader of the ruling political party and expect the whole thing to fold. There are remnants. There are split factions. There are still Nazis to this day. I dont think the movie executed on it very well. But the concept was the problem
10
Mr_Noh Mar 28, 2026 +13
To be fair, the EU did similarly, because "happily ever after" doesn't sell future works. I mean, how many times did the Alliance start juggling idiot balls just to make the Empire a threat again? :P (That's part of why when Mon Mothma talks about how many Bothans died to get those plans, I think "it wasn't enough".)
13
eagledog Mar 28, 2026 +11
It is supposedly 30 years of things being relatively normal, but yes, basically replaying the exact beats from the original trilogy with no actual plan from Disney was peak stupidity
11
Interesting_Olive_92 Mar 28, 2026 +24
The Resident Evil films are INFAMOUS for this. Each goes out of its way to ignore the previous one as fast as humanly possible.
24
the11thdoubledoc Mar 28, 2026 +37
The later Resident Evil movies tend to either do this or immediately handwave the cliffhanger away
37
EdmundTheInsulter Mar 28, 2026 +35
Highlander 2 What was this prize of knowing the thoughts of world leaders going to be used for? They didn't know either so they made him into an alien and rendered much of Highlander pointless.
35
dsmith422 Mar 28, 2026 +32
Him using the prize is actually explained in that abomination of a sequel. At the end of Highlander he explains the prize as *"like a whirlwind in my head. But if I concentrate... I know what people are thinking... all over the world. Presidents... diplomats... scientists. I can help them understand each other."* And then in Highlander 2: The Sequel That Was Not Made he explains that he used the prize to discover the idea for and build The Shield that protects the earth after the loss of the ozone layer. God, that movie sucked.
32
StarChaser_Tyger Mar 28, 2026 +18
Highlander 2: There Should Have Been Only One.
18
SESHPERANKH Mar 28, 2026 +8
Andrew Morahan, said he wanted to pretend that movie didnt exist. He personally hated it
8
somebuddyx Mar 28, 2026 +87
Not ignored but Mortal Kombat to Mortal Kombat Annihilation you kind of go "Wait...what?"
87
tisdue Mar 28, 2026 +56
Lol. That whole sequel was a wait what
56
Beginning-Action-602 Mar 28, 2026 +19
That whole sequel was straight ass 🤣
19
ghotier Mar 28, 2026 +19
Not that the first movie was Shakespeare, but the stakes of the first one make no f****** sense in light of the second.
19
z4guy Mar 28, 2026 +13
I love how Raiden just casually says “what closes can also open again” as a throwaway explanation
13
NeverCadburys Mar 28, 2026 +369
Half the Halloween franchise continued on tha very basis.
369
NiceBeaver2018 Mar 28, 2026 +180
Halloween II starts literally minutes after the first film. Halloween 3 is an outlier with nothing to do with Michael. Halloween 4 picks up with Michael escaping after being caught and in a coma from the events of Halloween II. Halloween 5 picks up literally during the ending of 4. It also addresses the Jamie angle, just in a shitty and lame way. Halloween 6 follows up on the ending of 5 with flashbacks to what happened immediately after the ending. Halloween H20 is where they change the story a bit, and the following film Resurrection follows the H20 ending. Rob Zombie’s movies follow each other similarly. The reboot trilogy also follows each other minutes after each previous film, with the exception of the last one (I *think*, I tried to forget the last one as much as possible). I ***really*** think Halloween is a bad example here.
180
No_Team_6326 Mar 28, 2026 +55
This guy Halloweens...
55
Electrical-Sail-1039 Mar 28, 2026 +6
Halloween 3 is a fun underrated horror flick. I loved it as a kid and I finally saw it recently and it held up well.
6
NeverCadburys Mar 28, 2026 +7
I liked Season of the Witch, it's a shame the idea to have multiple stories in the Halloween franchise didn't take off. 
7
chadowan Mar 28, 2026 +55
Don't get me started on the travesty of Halloween 5. It completely ignored the great franchise revival that was Halloween 4
55
CausticAvenger Mar 28, 2026 +25
Technically it doesn’t ignore Halloween 4’s cliffhanger, it just decides not to follow up on it in an interesting way.
25
Original_Sunset Mar 28, 2026 +78
Not a movie, but the ending of Stranger Things S4 ends with the upside down opening up the literal earth and billowing out into Hawkins, insinuating a massive battle of some sorts, only the have S5 immediately open up with having it covered up and life is normal
78
Unlucky_Actuator5612 Mar 29, 2026 +14
So many things wrong with season 5 🫣 so many things set up in previous seasons ignored. Made the whole thing feel like a joke. Me sad, statement.
14
jayjester Mar 28, 2026 +41
This is a personal vendetta between me and the Kingsman movies. The first one obviously ended with the world in complete and total anarchy and destruction. All the world political and financial leaders heads blown up, everyone violently slaughtered each other for several minutes. Tell me there would not be apocalyptic life after.
41
Linenoise77 Mar 28, 2026 +18
Marvel does a shit job of handwaving away the consequences of the blip. I'll die on the hill that She-Hulk was a perfect opportunity to just do a normal legal procedural dealing with that. Financial cases, family law, crimes related to it, big picture legal concepts. You have a limitless number of thought provoking, funny, and touching stories you could hit on each week and still keep stuff grounded. Her character would have been a perfect way of blending their world with real, relatively low stakes consequences that still had significance, and introduce entire new audiences to it. Great way to introduce or touch base with new characters with quick scenes or cameos. Re-occuring quick B-Plot things like Ant-Man fighting parking tickets for his van while he was caught in the quantum realm, that slowly make it to the supreme court...... You could still have a story line on top of all of that as well. We could do a 3 season arch just on heady concepts around copyright law and what the blip meant to it.
18
hawaiianbry Mar 28, 2026 +12
The end of Evangelion: 2.0 You Can (Not) Advance plus the post-credits tease show a markedly different 3.0 than what we got. Somehow Third Impact happened? Nerv was destroyed? None of that was even suggested by the end of 2.0.
12
hornyjaildotorg Mar 28, 2026 +5
Came here to find this. It can definitely be assumed that those events happened off screen but yeah it definitely makes for a shocking viewing experience when you watch 3.0 for the first time
5
Warpmind Mar 28, 2026 +13
The original Species had a rat eat a piece of the alien creature and get mutated by it. Never came up in the sequel.
13
AsexualNinja Mar 28, 2026 +8
And, since I wasted money on the expanded universe tie-ins, I can say it never came up in them.
8
AnAquaticOwl Mar 28, 2026 +41
https://www.looper.com/123930/cliffhangers-sequels-totally-ignored/
41
kcox1980 Mar 28, 2026 +22
I think a lot of people here are misinterpreting the intent of OP's question(or I am, wtf do I know?) We're not talking about sequels that quickly resolved or explained the cliffhanger but then went in a different direction. I think OP is talking about sequels that straight up pretended the cliffhanger ending didn't happen. People keep bringing up the Resident Evil movies, but iirc I don't think they ever actually did this. Didn't they always acknowledge and address the cliffhanger in the opening of the next one and then move on to a whole new plot? Highlander 2 also keeps getting mentioned but that also doesn't really count. That whole abomination of a story was actually written to accomodate the ending of the first one. They had to make them aliens/time travelers specifically *because* Conner was the last immortal left standing after he killed the Kurgen and they couldn't figure out how to explain there being more of them all of a sudden.
22
Johncurtisreeve Mar 28, 2026 +8
Not exactly a cliffhanger, but the descent two completely ignores the ending the actual ending of the descent one
8
Kangarou Mar 28, 2026 +16
There was a post in r/TopCharacterTropes that noted the like, seven times the Resident Evil movies did this. https://www.listnook.com/r/TopCharacterTropes/comments/1qnrehi/loathed_trope_the_movie_has_an_ending_the_sequel
16
Organic_Complex7783 Mar 28, 2026 +23
The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum kind of do the opposite of this. Supremacy skips ahead and has a little coda that wraps up rather than introducing a cliffhanger. Ultimatum seems to ignore the time skip and coda and continues from the scene before the wrap up. >!Ultimatum has its own time skip after the first scene, but you find out that most of the movie still takes place before Supremacy’s coda, and then repeats the coda, subverting the meaning of it, making it a pivotal point in the action.!<
23
largebrandon Mar 28, 2026 +27
The Mario Brothers movie. The first one, Princess barges in needing their help. In the next movie, they’re cartoons and never met before.
27
shadebug Mar 28, 2026 +7
At the end of Goal II our hero picks up the phone to find out that his estranged wife is pregnant. Goal III is a film about completely new characters going to the World Cup and also something about Romanian dwarf p*** if memory serves. I do not recommend you watch it. I consider it the worst professionally made film of all time and not in a good way
7
GhostBird12th Mar 28, 2026 +17
The ending of 28 Weeks Later shows the infected running through Paris, 28 Years Later however completely ignores that, and maintains that the virus never breached containment from the UK.
17
MajorStupi Mar 28, 2026 +22
A lot of horror movies like to have one final scare as the ending, which is then never mentioned in the sequel. Nightmare on Elm Street(1984), Friday The 13th Part 5, and The Evil Dead(1981) all end with cliffhangers but they’re not followed up on in the sequels
22
monty_kurns Mar 28, 2026 +40
The Evil Dead 100% follows up, though. The first bit of Evil Dead 2 is just an abbreviated speed run of the first since they couldn’t get the rights to re-use any footage. It picks up the continuity when Ash is thrown into the tree.
40
No-Obligation3993 Mar 28, 2026 +21
Evil Dead has followed it up in the sequel tho, the first 7 minutes of Evil Dead 2 were just a rehash of 1, but after that it continues the story.
21
SaltySteveD87 Mar 28, 2026 +10
A better example is Army of Darkness from Evil Dead II. It keeps the setup of Ash being sent back in time but ignores the knights hailing him as their savior.
10
Sonic10122 Mar 28, 2026 +11
Remember when Morbius ended with Michael Keaton’s Vulture coming out of nowhere? Implying some connection to the MCU?
11
StellaZaFella Mar 28, 2026 +4
Ask Annie Wilkes
4
PippyHooligan Mar 28, 2026 +6
... BUT I DIDN'T CHEER!
6
CartoonWeekly Mar 28, 2026 +5
He never got out of the c***-a-doodie car!
5
exaviyur Mar 28, 2026 +5
X-Men Apocalypse introduced the Phoenix Force to Jean Gray only for Dark Phoenix to do it again in a different way.
5
← Back to Board