This update is based on the sheriff being asked if the department was any closer to solving the case, to which he answered, “we are.” That’s it. Doesn’t inspire confidence.
2269
blackweebow1 day ago
+615
"Yup, we startin to believe she ded ded"
-AZ sheriff dept
615
MeganK801 day ago
+81
No cap
81
AlsoAllThePlanets23 hr ago
+29
awnnn gawwwd fam
29
BurdTurglary22 hr ago
+6
Also we are 💀🍑.
-AZ sheriff
6
CrocodylusRex1 day ago
+17
Nancy is no more more
17
IOVERCALLHISTIOCYTES19 hr ago
+2
We may add the third ded by summer
2
BenMcAdoos_ElCamino1 day ago
+83
In their defense, they’re closer now than they were the day before she was kidnapped
83
RecordHigh1 day ago
+24
Are they, though? if they never solve the crime or ultimately charge the wrong person, they'd be as far or farther from solving it today than the day she was kidnapped.
24
iankilledyou1 day ago
+20
Yeah but you’re moving the goal posts. Person you’re replying to said “the day before she was kidnapped”.
20
TheAskewOne23 hr ago
+10
I mean if it’s solved one day, every minute that passes brings us closer to that moment. What they said is true, it’s just entirely devoid of substance.
10
Chastain8622 hr ago
+5
It inspires roughly the same amount of confidence that the policeman does in "The Big Lebowski" when he says they're "all working in shifts!"
5
taco_cop22 hr ago
+6
What’s he going to say, “We’re not”. Stupid question by a reporter.
6
TJ_learns_stuff20 hr ago
+3
Yeah. I think it’s a dumb question, but it could have been answered more effectively, no doubt. “I don’t have an update for public release, but can assure you we’re following all leads and making use of all resources in our effort to find Mrs. Guthrie.”
Regardless of the answer provided to any questions related to this case, I have no confidence in the law enforcement agencies working it.
3
cruzrman20 hr ago
+3
They don’t know jack shit. If they did they’d be all over the news with it
3
Kbudz23 hr ago
+8
Lmao the sheriff the entire city of Tucson is trying to have resign because he's incompetent as f*** and lied on his resume
8
Swallagoon1 day ago
+4470
How do they know they’re closer if they don’t know the solution yet?
4470
jessnotok1 day ago
+2881
Today comes after yesterday therefore they're closer.
2881
Ahindre1 day ago
+365
The logic is sound.
365
Ritaredditonce23 hr ago
+62
The sound is Pretzel logic.
62
Past_Reference_657023 hr ago
+12
That's cheesy.
12
Anxiety_Fit21 hr ago
+10
Could be a Möbius strip donut.
10
HeyNineteen9620 hr ago
+5
I never met Napoleon, but I plan to find the time.
5
MrFaversham23 hr ago
+55
I bet they find her the last place they look.
55
stevesmele22 hr ago
+14
I’ve heard this one. So why didn’t they look there first?
14
true-skeptic16 hr ago
+3
That’s where I always find my glasses.
3
pantstoaknifefight220 hr ago
+2
That's why I always check the fridge multiple times a day
2
blazingunicorn21 hr ago
+3
Why would they keep looking after they find her? (Things are always in the last place you look…)
3
GMGarry_Chess1 day ago
+12
Basically. This "interview" was just a random guy approaching the Sheriff outside the Sheriff's Office. The Sheriff was just talking.
12
WhenTheDevilCome1 day ago
+37
Indeed, like the "we're closer than we've ever been" corporate speak about a company objective.
Whether it's solved by law enforcement 10 years from now, or by visiting space aliens 1000 years from now, we're closer to that future timeline *now*, compared to when she first disappeared.
37
SpiralOutski1 day ago
+49
Big if true
49
mood-park1 day ago
+18
Big if, true.
18
MaterialDetective1971 day ago
+6
True, if big.
6
nuisible23 hr ago
+7
Tomorrow is just your future yesterday
7
Warcraft_Fan15 hr ago
+3
The only question is how much closer? Will they finish solving it tomorrow? Or will it sit unsolved for 30 years while still "getting closer"?
3
Spire_Citron1 day ago
+279
They may have a suspect. Or they might just be saying they're closer because it sounds really bad if you say you aren't. Means a whole lot of nothing, really.
279
rrRunkgullet1 day ago
+131
Sometimes the authorities lie because they have eyes on someone and want to see how they react.
131
GeorgeCauldron71 day ago
+85
It's like Michael Scott's 30-day plan to save the company.
Day 30: The case is solved.
Day 29: ... we'll figure that out as we go.
85
zoeydoberdork1 day ago
+18
30 points in 30 days! Case closed
18
almostsk84globe23 hr ago
+7
Good thing no one was dumb enough to say she'd be found by a certain date. Then it'd be more like a Scott's Tots situation.
7
BubbleThinker1 day ago
+43
They ruled out two circus clowns and a Tupperware salesman from Kenosha so there are three less people to investigate
43
lesath_lestrange1 day ago
+31
I’m still suspicious about that second clown. I know his alibi was that he was in a car with 30 other clowns, but how do you fit that many clowns in that small a car?!
31
BubbleThinker1 day ago
+4
Someone in West Corvallis saw a clown near the convenience store acting fishy, so there might be a connection
4
Classic-Exchange-5111 day ago
+27
I would assume this means they have a pretty good idea of a suspect/ perpetrators but do not have the evidence to prove it in court yet
27
LittleKitty23523 hr ago
+25
I'd assume it's a generic response, because "We haven't made any progress", doesn't sound good.
25
DeliciousYoghurt756022 hr ago
+5
Right-they’re not going to say “We’re actually further from solving it than ever!”
5
afternever23 hr ago
+19
And you run and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death
19
GGXImposter21 hr ago
+13
If all the CSI I have watched is realistic, this is actually a psychological game they are playing. The police have no information what so ever. But by saying they are "close" the dumb criminals will screw up.
The investigators will go from zero leads to knowing exactly who the criminals are. They will then put on bullet proof vests and take point on a swat raid of a rust barn in the middle of no where.
13
mothandravenstudio22 hr ago
+14
Probably because they DO know the solution but they are waiting for final evidence to come in to make a better case.
Similar to the D4VD case, of course they knew from the beginning, but they needed to tie it up with a bow to present a very, very good case to a jury.
The suspect(s) will probably be someone we’ve already been introduced to in Nancy’s case.
14
WoolshirtedWolf1 day ago
+8
I think they do this possibly to flush out a suspect. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. This case has gotten way too much publicity and that kind of works against the SD, IMO.. I really thought they would've been able to do something with those pics taken off of her home camera.
8
trk291 day ago
+10
In two weeks time the kidnappers will have a nuclear weapon.
10
Predator_22 hr ago
+5
Things people say when they're at risk of being recalled / removed from being sheriff
5
Kianna919 hr ago
+2
Someone keeps sending them "waaarrrmmmmerrrr...." texts.
2
PrettyCoolBear21 hr ago
+2
The sheriff seems to just like talking to Media. I don't think they have any leads; they've been acting like they're on top of it from the start when obviously there have been no substantial benefits. (I hope I'm wrong, BTW, because if I'm right, the sheriff has just been needlessly giving the victim's family hope of some kind of resolution that may never come.)
2
katarina-stratford1 day ago
+719
I can't fathom families of missing persons/kidnapping going through an experience like this and having no closure. I'd absolutely lose my mind.
719
bbob_robb1 day ago
+465
A friend of a friend looked for his sister for almost three years after she vanished walking to her doctors office.
He led search parties, made fliers etc.
She was abducted and murdered. The murderers wife (married after the abduction) eventually tipped off police because the murderer kept some of her belongings.
I'm not sure I'd want to know my sibling was abducted and tortured. Not knowing might be worse though.
I didn't hang out with him during that time, but he was much quieter afterwards. It's been a few years and he still doesn't seem the same.
465
missmeowwww1 day ago
+175
A friend of mine has an eerily similar story except it was her aunt that had been abducted and murdered. My friend never met her aunt as this occurred when her aunt was a teenager but the experience caused my friend’s mom (aunt was moms sister) to be very strict and constantly wanting updates as to our whereabouts as teens. When we were old enough and learned more details about what happened, it no longer seemed overbearing. I cannot imagine how that family felt.
175
home-like-noplace21 hr ago
+55
I had a friend who was missing for 5 days before her body was found. The not knowing time is the worst part, every second is excruciating. Finding out she died and they found her was honestly a relief.
55
sashikku23 hr ago
+101
Not knowing is hard when true crime stories are everywhere. I barely know a girl from my area who’s been missing for 2 years now and sometimes I ruminate over her disappearance, wondering if she’s alive and being held captive. Wondering if she was murdered the day she went missing. She’s my age and we went to school together and run in the same circles so it’s a very eerie feeling.
101
gooba121 hr ago
+34
I'm from Iowa so Johnny Gosh is our famous long running missing child case. His mom has been a family aqquantince for years and while she's a lovely person she's definitely a bit off and my mom says she's really changed since he was abducted. Which is totally reasonable and understandable but I think if they finally found him she might get some closure instead of the constant thought he may still be out there and alive.
34
OperationMobocracy20 hr ago
+12
Does missing TV anchor Jodi Huisentruit still make the news in Iowa?
12
lacontrabandida18 hr ago
+10
I think about her now and then. I still have hope that they will find her remains so she can be laid to rest.
10
OperationMobocracy17 hr ago
+4
That provides some closure, but it’d also be nice to know who abducted her. There was a high profile abduction and murder here In Minneapolis six months later (Anne Barber Dunlap). In that case the only real suspect was her husband and no evidence could be found to pin it on him.
What creeps me out is that maybe both Jodi and Anne were abducted by the same person operating in the Midwest around the same time. The idea of roaming serial abductor/killers is pretty chilling, though this is really just my speculation and without any evidence besides the chronological proximity.
4
gooba118 hr ago
+3
Yes. There was a documentary recently about her. And one of the local anchors in desmoines who I believe was close to Jodi does stories on the anniversary of when she disappeared
3
asimplepencil19 hr ago
+3
My dad told me of something that happened in Oklahoma. A woman went missing and still has never been found. It's believed her family has ties to the county and city council, mayor, police, etc and so no one looked into it. It's a rural area so it's very easy to hide evidence. I hate that the family of the woman will never get closure. :(
3
SpiderRadio6 hr ago
+2
I'm sure the whole world doesn't feel the same, to him.
2
stellabitch1 day ago
+84
My family has been dealing with it for almost 60 years. Pima county had been little to no help at all. If anything they protected the perps. Still crickets from them. Poor uncle was buried 4 times at just 18 years old.
84
VivaZeBull23 hr ago
+19
I’m so sorry
19
jennyanydots7119 hr ago
+2
What do you mean by buried 4 times? So sorry your family has been dealing with that loss for so long with no answers. 😔
2
stellabitch9 hr ago
+6
Buried at the murder, found by dog walker, buried as John doe, then his body was dug up and stolen and later found by boys, reburied again as John doe and when he eventually got his name back after testing, buried in a family plot.
6
OPGuest22 hr ago
+30
We have a friend gone missing on a long hike in really difficult mountains. We suspect she’s dead, but we might never know for sure. Nothing has been found, after all these years and searches.
30
banshee_matsuri23 hr ago
+19
had an art teacher that went through it, and she definitely seemed to struggle a lot :( an absolute sweetheart, but definitely haunted by it.
19
allisjow22 hr ago
+16
I was thinking about [Kyron Horman](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Kyron_Horman) just two days ago. It’s been 16 years since he disappeared.
16
VivaZeBull23 hr ago
+16
Losing a cat is hard so, yeah. I don’t know how they do it. Stronger than me I think.
16
SnooDogs134021 hr ago
+7
Yeah not comparable but my cat disappeared one day. No signs of him. I was left with the what if and searching every day until I moved.
The loss was on me though, young and no idea on how to properly take care of a cat.
But I'll never forget searching and thinking every similar cat was mine.
There was a time we thought my elderly grandma was lost or abducted from the bus station. Now that gave a pain I haven't felt since.
This truly sucks and I hope there is some closure.
7
Prestigious-Pear62721 hr ago
+2
We lost a cat last summer (She was 12.) She sometimes slipped out the door. I was so thankful that we found her safe at home, laying on a bed. I would have worried myself sick if she just disappeared.
2
AdCreepy51651 day ago
+1170
Feels dystopian when government can read your email, tap your phones, pull up traffic c*** to write you fines, but can't find your kidnapped mom.
1170
Ready-Organization121 day ago
+698
Mass surveillance is to make money selling our data, not protect us, silly.
698
Tall_poppee23 hr ago
+65
Right? Dead people aren't buying anything.
65
Agreeable-Rooster-3720 hr ago
+17
plus her brand preferences were already set
17
RightC22 hr ago
+26
The will use stories like this to spread their tech even further fyi.
We are under 10 years away from police drones patrolling. Flock already builds them
26
BFTT19 hr ago
+5
“We help find lost dogs awww, aren’t we so altruistic?”
5
IceColdMilkshakeSalt1 day ago
+207
The surveillance state was never meant to benefit us. It was just sold to us that way for maximum compliance
207
Alicewithhazeleyes1 day ago
+50
I don’t ever remember being sold shit. It just happened. So…. Yea.
50
IceColdMilkshakeSalt1 day ago
+52
Idk how old you are but I am old enough to remember the Patriot Act being passed with massive support
52
gapipkin1 day ago
+20
You ever see Enemy of the State with Gene Hackman and Will Smith?
20
axonxorz20 hr ago
+3
Rotate around the Z axis.
3
SkunkMonkey22 hr ago
+7
I also remember the few hold-outs against the PA getting Anthrax mailed to them and changing their position to support it.
Yeah, not sus at all.
7
IceColdMilkshakeSalt22 hr ago
+8
The ONLY holdout from either party was Senator Russ Feingold, democrat from Wisconsin
8
Ancient-Candidate-7321 hr ago
+7
Loved that guy
7
Alicewithhazeleyes1 day ago
+10
41. Nobody’s asked for flock cameras and everyone hates them. But do go on.
10
sowhat418 hr ago
+2
And I'm old enough to remember that the Patriot Act was written before 9/11 as sort of a Conservative Wish List to derail civil rights. It was 'written' and passed a scant six weeks after 9/11. Most of its provisions are used to filch money off of drug dealers and people here illegally by nullifying the 4th Amendment.
It does nothing to protect against terrorism. It does everything to bolster police graft and corruption.
2
epidemicsaints1 day ago
+13
Social media and reality tv have made people romanticize surveillance and sharing personal info as a route to fame for 25 years.
13
Alicewithhazeleyes1 day ago
+7
I deleted all social media like Facebook and Instagram. I don’t have TikTok or anything personal for a social media. And it’s GREAT. I live my life like an undercover agent bc nobody ever knows what I’m doing bc I don’t share it with the world. I appreciate life more this way too.
7
LittleKitty23523 hr ago
+3
I mean...the government still knows what you are doing.
3
epidemicsaints1 day ago
+4
Yep I watch TV and troll forums like it's 1999. People who let their devices boss them around confound me. Answering 200 bells all day. I check enough on my own, I am online all day, I don't need corporation buzzers dictating my behavior.
4
Alicewithhazeleyes1 day ago
+7
Ok so I feel I need to share this bc I really don’t have anyone else to share with and it really blew my mind.
My boss man DELETES EVERY TEXT THREAD from his phone as soon as the conversation reaches its end point for that transaction. Every time.
He keeps a fully clean text message inbox and once that thread is solved or complete or fulfilled, he deletes it! He said it keeps his mind clean and clear and helps him organize his priorities each day.
We work in the funeral business so we do have constant change with in our work so he said it has helped him stay super on top of things so, I tried it.
AND IT WORKS SO WELL. Such an easy change and such a HUGE difference in my daily life and tasks and responding to people.
I have ADHD so out of sight out of mind is bad for me so this has become a real life hack so I wanted to share.
7
TrixnTim23 hr ago
+3
I do the same. Except I keep all texts from my adult kids. Just them. Everything else is deleted at days end.
3
axonxorz20 hr ago
+2
Some people consider Paw Patrol to be a pro-surveillance message. I don't think there's a grand conspiracy there, but it _is_ normalizing.
2
mayhemandqueso22 hr ago
+3
I mean there was one super bowl commercial about hacking cameras to find lost dogs like it was ground breaking to “rescue” our dogs lol. Not a cover to just freely hack our shit to sell data.
3
RightC22 hr ago
+3
Your tax dollars buy flock fyi
3
Alicewithhazeleyes21 hr ago
+2
Oh my gosh really?????? 😱
2
Vreas1 day ago
+19
Just like the cops it’s for policing rather than public safety. They just use “safety” as a bs justification PR term.
19
Machinegun_Pete1 day ago
+35
Just a reminder, they can't find the mother of the interviewer who interviewed the Epstein victims when the government was hoping the 'hoax' was going to blow over.
Not finding Nancy is part of their punishment to Savannah for doing her job. F*** the Guardians of Pedophiles.
35
utyuyt76tfyfg22 hr ago
+7
And how many other people have they kept quiet by doing this
7
bbmarvelluv20 hr ago
+4
That’s why I’ll never understand people rejecting the idea that Trump contacting Savannah and having the incompetent FBI “assist” on the case was just to taunt her. Not only did she interview the victims, people are forgetting the 2020 interview she had with Trump and she went hard on him.
4
Say_no_to_doritos1 day ago
+14
If you use a non-connected vehicle, fake or stolen plates, don't bring a phone, wear a hoodie/mask, and hide forensics it's good luck. Most PDs don't have enough time to analyze actual camera footage nevermind go try to deal with everything else.
14
Correct-Mail-194219 hr ago
+4
It also feels dystopian or something that this case is only getting this much coverage because her daughter is famous. There are hundreds of other missing persons out there - they're all someone's mom or dad or sibling or child too, but they don't get wall to wall coverage.
4
wip30ut19 hr ago
+4
... but also realize that these kidnappers are pros. They targeted Nancy Guthrie specifically because her residence was isolated, dark & insecure. And they scouted the location beforehand to check for private security monitors/patrols & c***. They turned off all their cell devices, used wifi jammers & disguised their license plate info. Moreover, there's some suggestions that they could be tied to Mexican or Central American mobs that regularly kidnap for ransom. If so their chats & social media are harder to trace because Latin nations use different messaging apps & their data isn't as scrutinized & dissected by algorithms as US/EU/Canadian users.
4
sharrrper22 hr ago
+9
But they tracked every step of the guy who shot the United Healthcare CEO from the moment he entered the city until he left. Seems like they can do it if a multimillionaire CEO gets killed.
9
Reddragon058521 hr ago
+14
I mean to be fair one took place in the middle of a major city while the other took place in a suburb in the desert.
14
AdCreepy516522 hr ago
+4
Until I see the evidence presented at trial, I refuse to believe they actually caught that guys killer. I think they just found a nutter who was running his mouth. Noticed the whole affair left mass media rather quickly after he was caught.
4
sharrrper22 hr ago
+8
Just to be clear: I'm not saying the guy they arrested is or isn’t the killer, but they did definitely track every step of the killer's (whoever that was) movements the entire time they were in the city by piecing together various camera footage from before and after the shooting.
8
_Panacea_1 day ago
+4
Especially when you're a really famous TV personality with a massive media presence behind you.
4
Gamer_Grease23 hr ago
+2
It is very likely they’ve already poured over the traffic c*** in the area.
2
DemoHD723 hr ago
+2
Seems like we should file a bogus claim against Nancy: "She never paid her taxes and made harmful threats to our congressmen", Feds will find her in no time! /s
2
Not_Sure__Camacho1 day ago
+2
Even more dystopian when there are credible odds that the government had a hand in the disappearance.
2
DrGonzzz1 day ago
+181
It’s crazy the coverage this case has gotten and they still have no idea who the suspect is or where Nancy is
181
Youngfolk211 day ago
+68
Well her daughter is a very well known broadcaster. Known countrywide and possibly worldwide. Hell I knew who Savannah Guthrie was before this case and I'm from Ireland.
68
MariettaDaws1 day ago
+59
Which makes it even crazier. You would think that this is the one time being a celebrity would come in handy and it just hasn't.
59
TiaxRulesAll20241 day ago
+20
Her mom was kidnapped to keep her silent about pedos. The current Whitehouse is full of people who are friends with convicted pedos
20
bbmarvelluv20 hr ago
+5
It wasn’t even just about the victims, she had been vocally against Trump and held that 2020 interview with him
5
Sea-Seesaw-86991 day ago
+6
Millions aren’t tv watchers though, I’m old and had heard of her but had to really think why
6
yourlittlebirdie1 day ago
+14
But you’ve heard of the case, that’s the point. Millions and millions of people have heard about this happening, have seen the photos of the guy, and yet no one has identified him or come forward with any information.
14
froggertwenty1 day ago
+16
They had video of the guy in the Delphi murders as well. Not as well known but massive news in the local and state level, and got national attention.
They had nothing for over 5 years. The guy lived right down the street from where it happened, sat at the bar next to the sketches of the suspect.
And there's still debate over whether he actually did it.
16
yourlittlebirdie1 day ago
+7
That case was wild. People who knew him definitely would have recognized him. And didn’t someone actually tip off the police early in the investigation but they screwed up and accidentally ignored it?
7
froggertwenty1 day ago
+5
That's part of what doesn't make sense. He is abnormally short for a man. None of the witnesses described the man they saw as short and he doesn't appear that short in the video. The FBI did a height analysis on the video but....it was never disclosed what that analysis showed. The description on the FBI website had a much higher height range than what the guy convicted of it actually was. They removed that description after the arrest.
He was never tipped in. He went to the police to tell them he was on the trails that day, before the murders, and the officer wrote his name down wrong and they filed him as cleared.
5
DisastrousDiddling20 hr ago
+3
He was smarter than that, he went to the DNR not the police. Enough to be able to tell others truthfully he checked in with the law, but he got the breakdown in communication between departments that he was counting on.
3
froggertwenty20 hr ago
+2
Not exactly. He didn't specifically go to the DNR, the police just happened to assign the DNR guy to interview him, because all the agencies were helping. There was no scheming involved on his end. The DNR guy also filed the tip just the same as the local agency, but it was filed as cleared by the local pd. There was no breakdown between agencies.
2
Sea-Seesaw-86991 day ago
+3
He did it, no question
3
maxxspeed5721 hr ago
+4
We don't know what they know.
4
SmallRocks1 day ago
+48
We don’t know what they know. There are numerous valid reasons for them to withhold information from the public.
48
ScottScanlon1 day ago
+104
When asked if they were close to solving the case, Nanos replied, “We are,” without elaborating. Yea he didn’t elaborate, because they still don’t have a f’ing clue.
104
Ozymannoches1 day ago
+46
"We doing everything we can from A to Z"
AZ Sheriff Dept.
46
nineteen_eightyfour1 day ago
+24
Id hope they’re not further from it after 100 days….
24
fcatw1 day ago
+45
Ka$h will find his bottle of bourbon long before this is solved
45
kapnkool1 day ago
+22
About as close as the release of George R.R. Martin's book "The Winds of Winter."
22
slurv31 day ago
+36
It’s an ongoing investigation, it does take time to build a case that won’t fall apart at trial. I think you can look at the D4VD case where everyone was shocked that he was allowed to be walking around free for as long as he was. Now we are learning some of the horrid details as the case and trial are starting to unfold.
Celeste’s body was found in September he wasn’t charged and arrested until February. I know our perceptions of law enforcement has been shaped recently by the DOJ, but this is what it takes to build a case especially one as high profile like this that will be scrutinized.
36
CrocodylusRex1 day ago
+27
But Celeste's body *was* found. If Nancy was found I don't think they'd have kept it secret this long
27
slurv321 hr ago
+4
There are cases where the body is never found, but they have enough overwhelming circumstantial evidence to suggest someone has something to do with the disappearance and charge them. They usually try to leverage it into a plea deal to locate the body, but there are cases where families can get justice, but not closure because they won’t reveal the location of the body.
My point with the Celeste and D4VD case is that work is likely being done to build the case that we aren’t aware of and even then it still took time to charge and arrest him and they had a body to work with.
4
nardling_131 day ago
+5
It can’t be getting further away from a solution, so this is technically true, I guess
5
funkiestj21 hr ago
+4
I'll wait for the Coen brothers movie to get the details.
4
Serenity201510 hr ago
+5
Nothing new to the investigation is in this article.
5
Warcraft_Fan9 hr ago
+2
except police claiming they are making "progress"
2
GeekFurious1 day ago
+39
Much like the Moscow, Idaho murders, when the cops get quiet, it's a sign they're homing in on someone. So, the fact he said this... means they've got nothing, or he wouldn't have said anything.
39
WalterPecky1 day ago
+8
Right right...
8
Warcraft_Fan1 day ago
+32
No name or details yet, just that they're closer.
32
catonsteroids1 day ago
+23
If you’ve still got a suspect/person of interest you’re looking at and trying to gather more evidence against them or still investigating them then I wouldn’t give out names or details either.
23
MeanGulf1 day ago
+30
I don’t think that’s at all weird
No need for the investigators to divulge
30
Available_Usual_973118 hr ago
+4
Was it the FBI? I bet it was the FBI.
4
jebei17 hr ago
+3
I live in Tucson and have always liked Sheriff Nanos.
But this case has shown he's clearly out of his depth. The man doesn't know when to shut up. I don't think the result would be any different if we had a different sheriff but he keeps stoking the flames when most times his answer should have been 'no comment'. In the future, PR experts will be teaching this case as an example of what not to do if you want to give people the impression you have everything under control.
3
a_phantom_limb23 hr ago
+10
That sheriff has struck me as full of c*** right from the start.
10
wittor1 day ago
+6
I sadly can't believe.
6
Time_Explanation121218 hr ago
+3
Sheriff's only doing this for his fame.
3
Technical_Anteater4516 hr ago
+3
Yeah sure thing, reality show sheriff
3
Toomanyeastereggs16 hr ago
+3
If there is one thing that outdoes the brutality of US law enforcement, it’s their sheer incompetence when it comes to solving crimes.
3
Ornery_Car688315 hr ago
+3
Translation: "We ain't found shit so we're going to release a bogus stetment saying we're close to spook the perp into doing something stupid."
3
polarwaves1 day ago
+22
I’m guessing alcoholic Patel couldn’t solve this so he just gave up entirely?
22
OMGBeckyStahp1 day ago
+21
I’m sure he’s diligently looking in the bottom of every bottle he empties
21
Glyph81 day ago
+13
J. Edgar Boozer, on the case
13
Bunbunsfun1 day ago
+4
They’ve said this from day 1. They don’t know shit.
4
ike717722 hr ago
+4
What a bunch of BS. If you haven’t found her-alive or dead- you are definitely not closer to solving jack shit. Poor Guthrie family has had an absolute bunch of imbeciles handling this case. How terrible
4
StDiabolique1 day ago
+5
"Disappearance"
Weird word choice.
She was kidnapped.
Why the change?
5
MariettaDaws1 day ago
+13
To be fair, it wasn't him who used the phrase . Iirc he said "yes we are" to the question and that was enough to write an article about because these tabloid people are very sad
13
Felon_musk19391 day ago
+6
No beer will be left unturned in the FBI search.
6
huebomont1 day ago
+7
Gotta stop publishing cop quotes like they’re news. This guy doesn’t have any more information than he has two weeks ago or we’d know it because there would be a celebratory press conference to pat themselves on the back.
7
ProTurtlee1 day ago
+7
I doubt she’s still alive
7
LittleKitty23523 hr ago
+12
Thank you Detective Obvious.
12
PhysicsIsFun21 hr ago
+3
I remember the police in Colorado saying the same thing about the murder of Jonbenet Ramsey in 1996. It remains unsolved 30 years later.
3
Sad-Math-20391 day ago
+6
In the same way my autobiography is closer to being finished after writing the word "the" on a blank piece of paper.
6
Mental-Rush20111 day ago
+5
In sheriff talk this means we're looking for a poor, homeless, mentally ill person that we can blame this on to get the heat off us.
5
123abcde32122 hr ago
+2
What, he's got her in his garage? C'mon...
2
Gypsymoth60616 hr ago
+2
While I never pay any real attention to anything labeled Fox News, I do think it’s really important to see Nancy Guthrie’s name and abduction mentioned in the news. Not only because it reminds the public about her, it puts pressure on someone who knows something to give it up. Because I don’t believe only one person was involved in this.
2
SiWeyNoWay14 hr ago
+2
Is she with the aliens?
2
naitsirt8914 hr ago
+2
If the cops all line up at arms length forming a human chain, eventually that chain will come in contact with the kidnappers.
2
MonchichiSalt13 hr ago
+2
*sherrif wants MAGA media attention again*
"We have nothing new but still want credit for showing up"
Meaning:
"Please vote for me again as Republican candidates are being flushed across the board"
2
SamuelYosemite1 day ago
+6
Surprised the Sheriff gets the opportunity to speak and not Kash Patel in an oversized jacket after a minor delay
6
oingapogo23 hr ago
+3
And he's got a bridge he wants to sell you.
3
This-Top739823 hr ago
+3
Lies lmao. They’re still clueless on who did it
3
Boonies222 hr ago
+3
We are also closer to landing on Mars.
I sincerely hope that she is found and brought home to her family, but it seems like the sheriff’s department and the FBI aren’t up to the task.
3
Big-Leadership-460422 hr ago
+3
Will have the answer in 2 weeks I'm sure....
3
Plastic-Ad-24961 day ago
+4
I completely forgot about this distraction when the Venezuela war happened.
4
FaustianBargainBin1 day ago
+2
Closer to the public moving on so they can bin the case, which is sort of like “solving” it in their books
2
boosayrian1 day ago
+2
Is it assumed that she is deceased by now?
2
SoFLShelfLove1 day ago
+2
Find out.. when Guthrie returns to host Wordle!
2
PlayedUOonBaja23 hr ago
+2
Yeesh, I hope this is solved before [her daughter's new game show](https://people.com/savannah-guthrie-announces-new-hosting-gig-nbc-game-show-11971233) premiers or it'll be an awkward watch.
2
Substantial_Hat_459023 hr ago
+2
Of course it is. He’s about to be removed from office and a someone else will finally manage the case
2
CantAffordzUsername22 hr ago
+2
In 2014 with just some random photos, people tracked down the Russian vehicle that shot down airliner MH17
Now with every home having a ring camera let alone city traffic c***, and local businesses I’m sure as hell that kidnappers car would be tracked for miles let alone getting a plate number. But no…we got the AZ sheriff who probably stands around and uses hand sanitizer like the TX officers in that horrible tragedy at the school
2
Sir-Bruncvik22 hr ago
+2
Either give the public evidence or a suspect. If you can’t do either one of those things, then keep your mouth silent - stop giving people false hope! 😡 It’s especially cruel to do that to the victims’ families!
2
Akron4433220 hr ago
+2
This crime being solved soon is as legitimate as the orange ass saying the war will be over quickly.
2
ColoradoNative71915 hr ago
+2
Yet the amount of non-wealthy people who are missing and don’t get this level of investigation is frustrating.
2
TanAllOvaJanAllOva15 hr ago
+2
She’s not getting nearly as much investigation as you’d think. That’s why ~~her remains~~ she hasn’t been located yet
2
ColoradoNative71915 hr ago
+2
This is true. Realistically she was very likely deceased after 48 hours. That said this is more attention than any woman from a reservation would get upon disappearance and this is why I point this out.
2
Infinite_Respect_1 day ago
+1
Government hit in the open. She isn’t getting found.
194 Comments