>In February, Amnesty International conducted an investigation into the strike. It concluded there had been no evidence of a military target at the time of the attack and that the strike should be investigated as a war crime.
How can Amnesty International legitimately conduct an investigation into the presence of Hezbollah inside of Lebanon? They don't have an intelligence agency, they don't have access to that information.
50
PeksyTigerApr 2, 2026
+36
They asked some Shia muslims that live there and they swore up and down that there definitely wasn't any hezbolla there.
36
KodaiClubApr 2, 2026
-2
Their verification appears to have relied on corroborating multiple independent sources: visual evidence, satellite imagery, witness testimony, and official statements, rather than a single source. Much like bellingcat. It’s in their report on the incident.
Edit: and to clarify your question is misleading. They have never stated they were investigating hezbollah presence in Lebanon. They investigated this attack specifically.
-2
Downtown-Ad-5990Apr 2, 2026
+20
Their investigations in the past were rubbish, their standards of evidence is ridiculously flawed, they would visit a damaged building a month after the incident and will conclude based on current findings.
They are probably the worst of bunch in terms of human right groups tho HRW is up there with them.
It’s not a serious organization but a an activists blog
20
ClankerCoreApr 2, 2026
+13
Artists can just do that? File a war crime case?
In all seriousness, though, why doesn’t everybody?
13
Wide-Equivalent6863Apr 2, 2026
+4
Maybe they didn't know they could (I don't really know how it works)
4
Ultra_MetalApr 2, 2026
+2
Hezbollah is guilty of everything that happens to the civilians they use as human shields. Using human shields is a war crime.
2
NateBerukAnjingApr 2, 2026
-10
nobody believe that anymore, this isn't 2016, everyone's waking up
9 Comments