· 16 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 17, 2026 at 7:19 PM

Aung San Suu Kyi to be freed earlier as Myanmar releases ex-president Win Myint from jail

Posted by AudibleNod


Aung San Suu Kyi to be freed sooner as Myanmar releases her ally from jail
www.abc.net.au
Aung San Suu Kyi to be freed sooner as Myanmar releases her ally from jail
Myanmar's ex-leader Aung San Suu Kyi has her prison sentence cut as thousands of prisoners are freed. Meanwhile, the UN reveals 2025 marked the deadliest year on record for Rohingya refugees fleeing Myanmar.

🚩 Report this post

16 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Toxic_Lantern 1 day ago +97
Feels less like reform and more like the junta trying to look reasonable while keeping power. Hopeful for them personally, but I’d wait for independent monitors before calling this any kind of progress.
97
Pale_Fire21 1 day ago +30
The Chinese have backed a new offensive against Myanmar since they refused to crackdown on human trafficking and organized crime in the border region between Myanmar and China. The Juntas days are numbered
30
oreography 1 day ago +10
Have you got a source for this? I thought China had been supporting the Junta with drones etc
10
eskjcSFW 1 day ago +17
China supplies all the factions. All the factions know not to touch China's shit in the country.
17
Vibingcarefully 19 hr ago +1
When most people pony up sources or "research" on the internet--it's hardly reassuring--just more confirmation bias, wobbly journalism and straw man stuff.
1
rajatsingh24k 1 day ago +16
The peace prize committee sure knows how to pick them!
16
Romeo_Glacier 1 day ago +55
She is not a saint. There has been quite a bit of evil shit she has done or allowed to be done. Things like jailing journalists and her silence and active denial of the Rohingya genocide.
55
CT_Phipps-Author 1 day ago +38
I'm not unsympathetic to the idea her presidency was always just a puppet to normalize Myanmar's junta but making the choice to do that was her choice.
38
Romeo_Glacier 1 day ago +37
She just isn’t a good person. The western media is always searching for a democracy overcomes dictatorship story. She just so happened to be chosen to push that narrative. Once it became clear that her portrayal was extremely false they stopped reporting on it. Leading to most only remembering the bullshit stories that were spun.
37
YANN-PAING86 1 day ago +3
40 million of her supporters disagreed with you. What was she supposed to say? She was representing the whole of Burma, not just as ASSSK. "Oh yeah, the junta definitely committed genocide. I stand with Rohingya?? 😁😁😂 What about international communities?? What about their silence?? If jailing a couple of journalists makes her evil, that makes her better than most of the rest of the world leaders. For your information, those Rohingya are being supplied and trained by the junta to weaken the Arakan army advances in Rakhine state. How about that?
3
Romeo_Glacier 1 day ago +17
77 million people voted for Trump. So maybe we shouldn’t peg someone’s morality on a popularity contest. The international community by and large condemned the genocide. It is actually one of the reasons the western media stopped sucking up to here like she was some sort of saint.
17
Soepyinnyar 1 day ago +6
What if shes not a saint? Shes has done far better for Myanmar as a whole than the junta themselves. THe junta with its military coup of 5 years have destablized the country, made Ethnic armed group more powerful, lost almost an entire state to an Ethnic armed group. Mind you they have also bombed hosipitals , schools and shelters and even POW ( their own men) Their troops pillage villages because they cant even afford to eat in the frontlines and are found with drugs . She recieves support from the public because of her stance for democarcy I feel the attention should be on the junta that has done the actual killings then the one who has indifference to it
6
Bilbog_Fettywop 10 hr ago +2
The military faction did almost all the killing. In Myanmar, the military (Tatmadaw) have their own political party. It's like the US marines having a party you voted for in elections, except in this case, they reserve 50% of the parliament seats + 1 seat (when Aung San Suu Kyi was active in the 2010s), and they don't report to anyone and provide their own funding. You know how tohe IJA and IJN pretty much decided things on their own and ignored everyone? It's like that except everyone else has their own private armies too. The changing of that parliamentary rule, and the coalition that actually won that election with 51% of the seats ousting the military was what cause the civil war to kick off again and as the military moved to take back control and dissolved all other political parties. It's not an exaggeration to say that the military party in Myanmar takes orders from no one. I know ASSK was called the president but she's not capable of giving them any orders. She can only shake hands with the devil and try to get a chance to stab him the back which ultimately failed. I don't think the Tatmadaw actually wanted to genocide the Rohingya, this was an operation to take more land and resources while everyone else was busy shaking hands. I would say however that it was ethnic cleansing. Myanmar isn't a unitary or even a federation government. To get anything done you have to talk to the different heads of the factions like the Karens Union, the Arakans, the Kachin Union, or yes even the Rohingya amongst a myriad of others. They're almost like little kingdoms inside of the country that have their own government within the regions they control. Every group has its own private military force which is why the civil war kicked off again so fast after parliament's dissolution and with such archaic weapons if you ever look at the battle footage coming out of there. Ever since the fighting began after WW2, the civil war in Myanmar never really truly stopped, it only ebbs in intensity. The whole releasing Aung San Suu Kyi thing in 2010 was a push by all sides to lay down their weapons and arguably is the closest thing to stopping the decades long fighting ever since ww2.
2
pihb666 17 hr ago +1
Wasn't she a total mother f***** in her own right? Something about killing a bunch of minority Muslims? Maybe the junta needs her help?
1
GCU_ZeroCredibility 1 day ago +2
Maybe there's another genocide she needs to tacitly endorse?
2
limits660 1 day ago +1
Wasn't she the one who won the Nobel Peace prize until they uncovered all those atrocities?
1
← Back to Board