As an Australian I just want to say, good for her, and I hope I never ever have to hear from her again. Every time somebody from the military comes up it's for all the wrong reasons. May she have a long and boring career!
342
Nz_Kasadiya6 hr ago
+56
\+1 The good eggs are the ones just get it done, she looks solid.
Unlike some of the other officers promoted, like that dickhead that had multiple complaints against him, still getting pushed higher up the chain.
56
Adventurous-Total6366 hr ago
+9
She is a good un'
9
Equivalent-Repair4884 hr ago
+6
Idk about Australia, but over here in my country, we will hear about them usually thrice. When they assume a high command position, then their step down from said position years later, then a little bit later news about their new position in our politically dominant party.
Not many scandals though thankfully.
6
jango_mando_mango2 hr ago
+1
Sounds like Singapore.
1
Equivalent-Repair4882 hr ago
+1
It is lmao
1
plutoforprez2 hr ago
+1
As an Australian, I’d be worried about the glass cliff if I were here (See: Susssssan)
1
Wakkaboyy6 hr ago
+103
That still doesn't change the fact that there are 49 million kangaroos in Australia and 3.5 million people in Uruguay.
Which means if the kangaroos were to invade Uruguay, each person will have to fight 14 kangaroos.
103
TowelCarryingTourist6 hr ago
+43
Wait until you hear what the emu can do.
43
herlanrulz6 hr ago
+7
American here: (sorry) Aren't they the birds that participate in non-consensual love?
7
TowelCarryingTourist6 hr ago
+10
Search for "great emu war". Thr kangaroos have never won a war.
10
herlanrulz5 hr ago
+3
That sounds like some current conflicts. Conventional armies spending their nations into oblivion to combat drones that cost a couple hundred bucks.
3
EtherealPheonix5 hr ago
+1
Maybe not on their own, but the Canadian's brought hundreds of them to battle the Germans back in the day.
1
Idrawstuffandthings6 hr ago
+6
I thought ducks were the biggest offenders there?
6
herlanrulz6 hr ago
+4
I've spent a lifetime online, and used to have a bunch of Aussie guildmates. It's not always easy to separate fact from "aw I was just yankin' your chain mate".
4
TowelCarryingTourist5 hr ago
+1
Yep. Just when you think we are taking the piss by pulling your leg, we turn around and take the piss be being straight as.
1
redmusic14 hr ago
+1
You need to read up on The Emu Wars ( spoiler - the Australian Army lost ).
1
AlcoholicWombat3 hr ago
+1
It was consensual with the ginger and boots
1
ExistentialMeowMeow5 hr ago
+2
you afraid of the roos and emus? it's the drop bears that'll get ya
2
za724 hr ago
+1
Emus aren't real, that's just a coverup
1
Sans-valeur6 hr ago
+6
Does that mean that next door with 5.3 million, we’re safe because we’d need to fight less than 14 per person?
That’s reassuring. Plus the wallabies and laser kiwis would have our backs.
6
poukai5 hr ago
Excellent, our masterplan luring Kiwiland into a false sense of security has worked. Emutopia for ever! Release the Tasmanian devils! \*evil laughter intensifies\*
0
danimal60006 hr ago
+3
Do you think that’s going to be a thing or can I rest easy in my opera house?
3
Trep_xp5 hr ago
+2
If you're in an Opera House you're more at risk from attack by [seals](https://incidentallysydney.com/blog/bennytheseal).
2
KnotSoSalty6 hr ago
+3
The President of Uruguay probably has a Ned Stark type who reminds him that the Kangaroos have no ships.
3
N0guaranteeofsanity2 hr ago
+1
They don't need ships!
https://youtube.com/shorts/g6R-tE_HjQE?si=qo9RZmwUhE1UimcL
1
squeeze-my-lizard6 hr ago
+3
As a neighbor of that amazing small country, I can confirm you (or cangurus) cannot fight Uruguay. It’s impossible. They are the nicest people, in less than 5min you’d be drinking mate with them and calling them hermanos.
3
Trep_xp5 hr ago
+2
Pffft that's so unrealistic
But they *could* invade NZ. It's just across the ditch.
2
Acceptable-Lie1883 hr ago
+1
Found Bob Catters sock puppet account right here.
1
sljxuoxada6 hr ago
+76
...and she probably still uses less makeup than Pete Hegseth.
76
beegtuna5 hr ago
+14
Less eyeliner than couch f*****
14
herlanrulz6 hr ago
+15
probably? Trump and Kegsbreath could give the cast of Drag Race a run for their money on makeup used.
15
HungryCurrency84813 hr ago
+22
Facebook dads about to lose their minds between this and their favourite war criminal getting arrested
22
derverdwerb3 hr ago
+6
They’re way ahead of you. My Facebook feed is just full of these mysogynist idiots saying they stand with the murderer and accusing the army of DEI.
6
Uzorglemon2 hr ago
+1
As someone who is on Facebook all to often for work, I'm already seeing a staggering amount of negativity and outright misinformation. It's really sad.
1
ILUVMOVIESSS6 hr ago
+21
But what's her plan for the second emu war?
21
Unumbotte6 hr ago
+6
A pre-emptive strike.
6
beegtuna5 hr ago
+9
They have been 2 months away from making a nuclear bomb for 3 decades.
9
TowelCarryingTourist5 hr ago
+1
Wasn't it 47 years?
1
Klarok3 hr ago
+2
Pre-emutive strike
2
Metacomet995 hr ago
+15
Congratulations from this female US Army veteran!
15
Sieve-Boy2 hr ago
+1
Just go read General Coyle's experience, leadership and command history, training and education.
The General has a lot of experience.
1
vacri3 hr ago
+3
Was wondering why she and her predecessor were 'only' lieutenant generals. Apparently the only full 'general' in our army is whomever holds the post of chief-of-army
(I'm used to hearing other militaries having many 'generals')
3
AdventurousDay30202 hr ago
+1
The rank of “General” in Australia is only held by those appointed to the position of CDF, not CA. Hence why both Simon Stuart and Susan Coyle are “only” Lieutenant Generals. There are only 2 permanent three star positions in the ADF being the other service chiefs who hold an equivalent rank but there are other three stars across the Australian Defence Organisation.
1
vacri2 hr ago
+1
So sometimes we have a 'general' and sometimes we don't, depending on if a soldier is holding that office at the time (rather than a sailor or airman)?
1
AdventurousDay30202 hr ago
+1
Correct. In the same way that navy only have a four star Admiral if the CDF is navy.
1
GageRoadsGull2 hr ago
+1
Close but not quite, a full General (a four star rank) would be Chief of the Defence Force, while the heads of Army, Navy and Air Force are all three star ranks (Lieutenant general, Vice Admiral or Air Marshal).
The previous Chief of Defence was from the Army and was a General. The current Chief of Defence Force was appointed from the Navy and is a four star Admiral, while the Chief of Navy is ‘only’ a three star Vice Admiral.
1
[deleted]6 hr ago
+2
[deleted]
2
beegtuna5 hr ago
+3
He’s probably drunk right now
3
Krocsyldiphithic5 hr ago
-6
Go girl! Women are just as capable of perpetuating immorality as men!
-6
drainfrog_926 hr ago
-23
Genuinely cool milestone, but I’m way more interested in what she does about stuff like veteran care and procurement waste. Maybe media should press harder on those instead of just the “first woman” angle.
-23
derverdwerb5 hr ago
+33
The Chief of Army doesn’t have jurisdiction over veterans’ affairs, and if she did, it’d only be for members of the Army - not the other two services. Those issues are the jurisdiction of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.
33
AdventurousDay30203 hr ago
+15
I would recommend knowing what Australia’s Chief of Army does prior to commenting on it if you’re going to make silly comments and disparage her achievement
15
-Striking-Willow-3 hr ago
+10
Maybe you should try harder at knowing what you're talking about before you start looking for something to criticize. Neither of those are things she will be responsible for. If those are topics that you actually care about and aren't just bristling automatically because a headline mentioned the "first woman" angle, which is, as you acknowledged, a noteworthy milestone, you could start by looking up the department of veterans affairs and the minister for veterans affairs and defence personnel, Matt Keogh
10
Dismal_Animal46372 hr ago
+1
Army don’t run large procurement projects - CASG exists to do that, and is where you’d be looking for procurement waste (outside of small procurement, but that’s not the main waste). CASG have a civilian head (Depsec CASG) not a uniform one.
1
Unhappy-Bullfrog55974 hr ago
-32
That's some prime DEI right there, gj
-32
AdventurousDay30203 hr ago
+17
She’s been commander of the Middle East AO for Australia, previously held the appointment of Chief of Joint Operations, Commander of FORCOMD and has multiple deployments under her belt. She’s had a distinguished career since 1987, and there are only three out of the nine three star officers in the ADF who are female, so please tell me how she is a DEI hire when she has clearly gotten to where she has on her own merit.
17
derverdwerb3 hr ago
+10
She isn’t a DEI promotion, u/Unhappy-Bullfrog5597 just hates women.
10
Unhappy-Bullfrog55973 hr ago
-20
I do? Ah thanks for clarifying that
-20
joefarnarkler3 hr ago
+12
Are there any conditions for you, under which a woman could have this kind of job without being accused of being a DEI hire?
12
Unhappy-Bullfrog55973 hr ago
-21
That's the problem nowadays, it's so pushed everywhere all the time that we don't know anymore who deserves it or not
-21
joefarnarkler3 hr ago
+16
You seemed to have been able to make up your mind. How did you come to your conclusion?
16
Unhappy-Bullfrog55973 hr ago
-10
What do you mean?
-10
Ohmynamageoff3 hr ago
+1
Surely an Officer who’s been in since 1987 is a person who would clearly qualify, ya gronk
Ps worked with her, would do so again
1
Unhappy-Bullfrog55973 hr ago
+1
Plenty of old timers in the army, and plenty have worked with plenty. What's you point
1
Athrul3 hr ago
+1
Yet you know exactly that she doesn't deserve it...
1
Unhappy-Bullfrog55973 hr ago
+1
We don't know who deserves it anymore
1
Highwinter3 hr ago
+7
Saying this right after it came out that the head of the US military blocked promotions of certain people (almost all POC and women) in order to push people who share their loyalties is hilarious.
You're being played like a fiddle.
7
AdvertisingFun37393 hr ago
+1
DEI is when women do things
1
Unhappy-Bullfrog55973 hr ago
+1
DEI is when you force things to happen because of a bias
1
AdvertisingFun37392 hr ago
+1
Could you provide an explanation as to why a woman isn’t deserving of this position?
1
Unhappy-Bullfrog55972 hr ago
+1
Already discussed above. Not saying she doesn't deserve it, the problem is we'll never know
1
Lase1893 hr ago
+1
Yay, more women war criminals. This is the second best news for feminism I've heard after Kim Jong Un's daughter being named his successor.
73 Comments