ListNook

CA719 Mar 26, 2026 +160

is this a prequel to Ecks Vs Sever?

160

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +25

Such a niche joke aha

25

trevorthewebdev Mar 26, 2026 +12

Ballistic: When Ecks met Server

12

pmish Mar 26, 2026 +28

Damn, you beat me to the joke. Well played. ;)

28

Two-FacedMarlin Mar 26, 2026 +7

Movie aside, probably one of my fave gba games too

7

FasterOnFire Mar 26, 2026 +2

Haha No, she’s a mother.

2

Monster-Zero Mar 26, 2026 +7

Yes I know she's Ma-Ma, but is this a prequel to Ecks vs Sever

7

spctclr_spiderman Mar 26, 2026 +2

Ecks vs Sixer

2

RefinedBean Mar 26, 2026

Dubleyu vs Sixer

0

patatjepindapedis Mar 26, 2026 +128

At first glance I thought that was Walton Gogglins

128

1800pengwings Mar 26, 2026 +83

Lena Headey as Walton Goggins

83

JasonVorhehees Mar 26, 2026 +30

Lena Headey as Uncle Baby Billy goes so hard

30

LibraryAndStepOnIt Mar 26, 2026 +15

Lena Headey is… **TEENJUS**.

15

2naFied Mar 26, 2026 +7

Who wants to suck an old man's d***?

7

carloslet Mar 27, 2026 +2

Lena Headey Bible Bonkers!

2

Highside1269 Mar 27, 2026 +2

Just a lady, dressed as a dude, playing another dude!

2

TrueLegateDamar Mar 26, 2026 +10

My thought was Mickey Rourke

10

pembunuhUpahan Mar 27, 2026 +3

Could be Walter Groggins grandmother

3

Hi_Im_Paul1706 Mar 26, 2026 +2

Probably dug coal together in backwoods of Kentucky

2

OsitoPandito Mar 26, 2026 +1

I thought it was Miguel from Cobra Kai

1

TheThirdKing Mar 26, 2026 -12

You deserve many upvotes for this 😂

-12

MyWorldTalkRadio Mar 26, 2026 +40

Do the app really update in a way that YouTube posts now have unskippable 15 second ads?

40

acabincludescolumbo Mar 26, 2026 +14

revanced, smarttube, ublock

14

AlludedNuance Mar 26, 2026 +2

Cleantube

2

JWAdvocate83 Mar 28, 2026 +1

Do any of those work on an iPhone?

1

MorsVigiliaAstartes Mar 26, 2026 +114

For a movie all about guns, they seem to have gotten a lot wrong just in the trailer to include the scene where the round is being ejected you can still see the bullet seated inside the casing

114

Adefice Mar 26, 2026 +30

It's likely because they are tamping down on the use of live ammo in filming. Looks like they just racked a round and sped it up to "look" like it was being fired.

30

dakotanorth8 Mar 26, 2026 +53

In “Elevation” Morena Baccarin literally puts a round in backwards and then loads the mag into an AR (during her scene where they are trying to establish her as some skilled military firearms person). It’s clear as day lol. Quick google, and there’s a Listnook post already:) [https://www.listnook.com/r/movies/comments/1h3mge7/in\_elevation\_2024\_that\_round\_does\_get\_put\_in/](https://www.listnook.com/r/movies/comments/1h3mge7/in_elevation_2024_that_round_does_get_put_in/)

53

lipp79 Mar 26, 2026 +20

Well see if you put the bullets in backwards, they just hit people with the blunt end and knock the wind out of them.

20

Kaldricus Mar 26, 2026 +16

"Set weapons to non-lethal" *Flips mag around*

16

Ghetto_Phenom Mar 26, 2026 +9

This is some naked gun level shenanigans and would fit perfect.

9

MyStationIsAbandoned Mar 26, 2026 +14

In the Suicide Quad game Harley Quinn kills >!Batman!< with a revolver and they play audio of a bullet casing being automatically ejected and dropping onto the ground... millions of dollars and hundreds of people working on the game and no one caught it.

14

LeftSky828 Mar 27, 2026 +1

Those bullets get shot in the other direction.

1

betweenbubbles Mar 27, 2026 +1

This is also a famous meme that came from an HK advertisement. Maybe it was intentional and they were actually going for the lulz?

1

gongonzabarfarbin Mar 26, 2026 +15

They sure do say "bullet" a lot and is it a doctor giving her the casing?

15

scowdich Mar 26, 2026 +17

A casing with an unused, fresh primer.

17

Northbr1dge Mar 26, 2026 +13

It's fuzzy, but it looks like the ejected round has a crimped nose, like the ones you see with blanks: [https://blankammo.com/cdn/shop/files/SA31A1---223-A1-5-56x45-001---900px.jpg](https://blankammo.com/cdn/shop/files/SA31A1---223-A1-5-56x45-001---900px.jpg)

13

MorsVigiliaAstartes Mar 26, 2026 +8

Yeah on my watch back I would agree, but even so, lazy

8

sneakin_rican Mar 26, 2026 +18

I don’t understand how movies f*** this up so bad. Just hire some gun YouTuber guy to sit there and go “that isn’t how that works take that out. Maybe try this?” then put his name on the marketing and profit.

18

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +50

Because it quite literally doesn't matter. For every individual comment complaining about this online there are going to be thousands of people who will watch it and not notice or care.

50

Djinnwrath Mar 26, 2026 +17

I know more than the average person about guns and I could not care less. Action movies are better for not treating guns realistically.

17

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +10

The thing that's frustrating is that they nitpick these details but overlook numerous other details that are equally unrealistic. Like movies are all a fabrication, everything about them is a construction. People in movies do not talk like real people do, they talk in a way that is meant to advance the plot or underscore the themes. They do things like hang up without saying goodbye, or leave food unfinished. People walk into the front of one building and then the camera cuts and the interior is a completely different one. Nitpicking these minor details is a self report on how little one knows about the medium and its construction.

10

scowdich Mar 26, 2026 +6

People get hung up on details in movies that relate to things they're familiar with. Gun enthusiasts focus on gun details, computer people focus on computer details, car people focus on the car stuff. And they all post.

6

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +4

I know lol, and it's equally annoying every time. Most people are aware though that just because these things bother them, it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.

4

ThreeLeggedMare Mar 26, 2026 +1

Personally I don't understand how filmmakers can have the critical mass of desire and gumption to make the thing, but don't care to fix easily addressed inconsistencies. If I put my name on something, that I spent months or years on, I'd want it to be as good as possible

1

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +8

Because the things you guys care about don't matter in this context. It's very obvious you guys don't create art. Most artists are not perfectionists because most professional art is being made under certain stipulations. Budgets, deadlines, resources, etc. It doesn't make sense to worry about details that the majority of the audience both a) doesn't care for and b) doesn't have an impact on the film's artistry. Things like character, theme, cinematography, dialogue, etc, pretty much all of the actual artistic depth in a work has NOTHING to do with whether or not someone called a magazine a clip or vice versa.

8

ThreeLeggedMare Mar 26, 2026 +7

It's not about perfection. It's about very easily fixed mistakes

7

GainOk7506 Mar 27, 2026 +4

Go listen to the guy who made VVitch. He literally talks about how perfection and tiny details are important to a film. [https://youtu.be/5qdP7lr8kI4?t=353](https://youtu.be/5qdP7lr8kI4?t=353) \--- Here is the youtube link if you don't want to read his thoughts. "I didn't obsess over Puritan buttons just because I like buttons. I didn't obsess over the saw the marks and the floorboards because I like saw marks. Like, I mean, I do like buttons and saw marks. I do. It's sad. But It's in the purpose of telling the story. It's about immersing you in the world. If you can't, you know, be actually transported to the 17th century, then you can't actually be transported into the mindset of these English Puritan Calvinist settlers. And if you can't do that, then you can't believe in the witch and the whole movie just doesn't work. So that's why this is important, you know, and like no one's going to stand up and and say like those clabards aren't the right clabards. Those are cedar. They should have been oak fail fail fail! No one's going to do that. But the more you let things slide like that, the more that the whole thing like doesn't work." \- [Robert Eggers](https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&hs=SlvU&sca_esv=ab7f61c36d6d1228&sxsrf=ANbL-n7zOU2V_qUt0NIem5nPyKrPu1LMUA:1774605192858&q=Robert+Eggers&si=AL3DRZGDMkmBg1SB5TH8o8Xeh03tgmwpgZCgiYi5BFB_ELNOTKIJJXCGQPEK4PGFdW1yLdVOjNKS7twWquSIiHY3QOtNwznUvt84rFC1RQMdhJWoCY7IBXmAoCaSUpv9gQ0IAPnPcsZ0fYlRZ6KyFsB60WuadcyLGSTqfENWHQAuM_kHC46wc8iBxrknCCUXD63SyzSWT6ymsg3GXdRr16sausVgVlTbfg%3D%3D&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwip44vB57-TAxWBh68BHavqKVQQmxN6BAgoEAI) His logic is that a films details have to be believable for the film to be believable for the film to even be considered good.

4

sneakin_rican Mar 26, 2026 +3

“It’s very obvious you guys don’t make art” 🤣 ok man it’s very obvious you think you do 👨‍🎨 Things like character, theme, cinematography, etc don’t sell movies. What world are you living in? Clearly it has a better film industry.

3

RedditReader4031 Mar 26, 2026 +2

Then explain character actors, Private Ryan actors boot camp, DeNiro, Crowe and others who gain or lose substantial weight to accurately portray characters, and so on.

2

sneakin_rican Mar 26, 2026 -5

Ridiculous. Most people aren’t going to care about any given movie anyway. Actually having accurate gun stuff in your definitely-not-a-John-Wick-movie movie could be the difference between making your money back and not making your money back. But clearly most people in Hollywood think like you so maybe you have a point lol

-5

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +7

It's not ridiculous, it's the truth. It's not most people in Hollywood who think this way, it's most people. Accurate gun stuff in a movie is not what makes a movie its money back. You guys are projecting your very specific tastes onto the general public and assuming everyone thinks the way you do about this subject, but they don't.

7

sneakin_rican Mar 26, 2026 -1

lol I’m not a gun freak, I just think gun freaks are an underserved market in the movie biz. And I think giving some kind of shit about what is physically possible with a firearm when one of your largest and wealthiest markets has more guns floating around than people could maybe possibly create some positive marketing spin. I’m not advocating for hyper-realism or anything, more just moments where nerds can go “oh wow cool detail” or “hey I know that too” before getting back to stylized action. It works for Marvel and Jurassic Park… Movies that appeal to “everyone” are stupid and risky. Nerd shit sells.

-1

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +7

"Gun owner" isn't a demographic. Those people fall into whatever age and gender bracket they are a part of. They already watch the same action movies as you and me. Making movies with realistic weaponry isn't going to open up some untapped market. It's just so painfully obvious how little you guys know about marketing or how movies are made.

7

Djinnwrath Mar 26, 2026 +7

Realism in gun play doesn't affect movie sales. If anything it's the reverse that's true.

7

BRXF1 Mar 27, 2026 +1

John Wick made bank and it's basically a superhero movie.

1

robot_ankles Mar 26, 2026 +5

Same for computer hacking security stuff. So much techno c*** could be *just slightly* adjusted in a way that's totally accessible to a general audience AND advance the plot efficiently BUT not sound like absolute horseshit.

5

Accomplished-Law-652 Mar 26, 2026 +2

I know! I fuckin' hated Predator and Terminator 2 because the minigun didn't have an external power source like it needs in real life! Who the f*** let that slip through!!

2

CaptainRedblood Mar 26, 2026 +3

Shame!

3

blahyawnblah Mar 26, 2026 +1

She's one of the most anti-gun people around, so makes sense.

1

onehedgeman Mar 27, 2026 +1

At least the one hitting the ground (seems to be the second half of the same scene) at the end is empty

1

mr_ji Mar 26, 2026 +1

Thank you for ammosplaining it to us.

1

chrishouse83 Mar 26, 2026 -25

Anti-gun/2A stuff rarely get the facts right.

-25

Ratathosk Mar 26, 2026 +21

Mm, meanwhile movies with guns outside of anti-gun/2A stuff gets it right all the time. Nah dude, hollywood realism has been a thing since always.

21

chrishouse83 Mar 26, 2026 -14

No I get you, and you're right. I just know that when I'm reading a book and author uses "clip" when he means "magazine", it's a good sign he's probably never even touched a gun.

-14

Adefice Mar 26, 2026 +1

I'm reading Silo right now and that exact thing happens, lol.

1

Ratathosk Mar 26, 2026 +1

Sure, that's fair. It's also a typical example of when they might even do so intentionally with the audience in mind.

1

Own-Librarian-9699 Mar 26, 2026 +12

What is anti gun about vigilante justice?

12

SgtNeilDiamond Mar 26, 2026

Lmao thats actually hilarious

0

faultysynapse Mar 27, 2026

Maybe they were clearing a malfunction?

0

guilhermefdias Mar 27, 2026

"a lot wrong" Mentions a single scene.

0

jackcatalyst Mar 26, 2026 +7

Interesting to use the license plate thing. I remember when that was in the news for the DC shooter spree

7

snarpy Mar 26, 2026 +4

where is Sever?

4

OneOfTheLostOnes Mar 26, 2026 +1

lol

1

briareus08 Mar 27, 2026 +5

Realistically, I’ll watch anything with Lena Headey in it. Same for Charlize Theron, these women kill it with dramatic characters IMO.

5

1800pengwings Mar 26, 2026 +13

I bet she shoots guns in the movie, several times.

13

CultureWarrior87 Mar 26, 2026 +41

This seems like a solid revenge thriller with a murder mystery hook but the comments are so nitpicky. Y'all are miserable.

41

DopeyDeathMetal Mar 27, 2026 +4

R/movies actually hates movies. This is universally true for every large sublistnook.

4

TiberianSunset Mar 27, 2026 +2

Why does every large sublistnook hate movies?

2

betweenbubbles Mar 27, 2026 +1

It's just a weird premise. We're \*\*\*W A Y\*\*\* past it being significantly suspicious if an AR and 5.56 with a headstamp from a company which has a military contract is used against Americans. This stuff is everywhere now.

1

xEtownBeatdown Mar 28, 2026 +1

I'm curious on your take on this. The premise shown here is not a "murder mystery" in my eyes but more of a "the Government has secrets and is out to get you" message. It's not that it isn't a mystery as to why her son was killed and by whom, but anyone on a battlefield could potentially get their hands on a discarded gun and fire at someone else :P

1

CultureWarrior87 Mar 28, 2026 +1

Those things aren't mutually exclusive. A lot of noir films and murder mysteries involve government officials using their power to cover things up. I also didn't say that it was a murder mystery, just that they use the murder mystery style hook of "Who killed her son?". The trailer makes it seem like she's investigating her son's death and wants to know specifically who killed him.

1

[deleted] Mar 26, 2026 -15

[deleted]

-15

mr_ji Mar 26, 2026 +5

It's actually very easy to ignore. Movies botch things I know about all the time, and that's OK, because every writer and director doesn't have my same experiences and are trying to tell a story, not make a documentary. If it's so off-putting, maybe avoid movies centered on these sorts of things for you.

5

RancidVagYogurt1776 Mar 26, 2026 +14

Have you been tested? Movies get visual and clerical details of my job and hobby wrong all the time, shit happens

14

zodiac1968 Mar 26, 2026 +2

😂

2

ILoveRegenHealth Mar 27, 2026 -1

Your screen name makes you sound like the unhinged one. And stop glazing this Direct-To-DVD looking c*** so hard.

-1

RancidVagYogurt1776 Mar 27, 2026 +3

Son, I think you might be confused. I didn't say a singular word about this movie.

3

CultureWarrior87 Mar 27, 2026 -1

Some of the best action movies were direct to video, you don't know ball.

-1

ILoveRegenHealth Mar 27, 2026 +1

Name some, guru

1

lipp79 Mar 27, 2026 -1

Tested for what? I never said they didn’t get stuff wrong. Was just simply putting a theory out as to why some things bother people and other things don’t. I guess I should have said it annoys me more than drives me nuts when it’s such a simple detail to get right.

-1

ILoveRegenHealth Mar 27, 2026 -5

B**** it's called different opinions. Ya'll sound like a baby "You must like what I just watched waaaaah!"

-5

CultureWarrior87 Mar 27, 2026

You sound like an idiot. That's not what I said. No one has to like the movie but if you think a movie is inherently bad because they got some terminology wrong then you're nitpicking. Maybe you should google what the word "nitpicking" means?

0

ILoveRegenHealth Mar 27, 2026 +2

>but the comments are so nitpicky. Y'all are miserable. You sound whiny and idiotic If someone says it looks like c***, stop crying about it. Are you an investor in this low budget shitfest? Just say your piece ("I love it!") and leave others out of it, idiot kid You want me to try one? This movie looks like c***. All the people who loved the trailer have pieces missing from their brain and are miserable people to be around. See the difference when I bring in other people on top of my personal opinions, genius?

2

robot_ankles Mar 26, 2026 +29

"Why does a translator know so much about firearms?" LOL, is this a European film? Why does my hilarious unemployed idiot cousin know so much about guns? They're like a walking encyclopedia of firearms knowledge.

29

RancidVagYogurt1776 Mar 26, 2026 +6

Nobody on this planet is obsessive about gun trivia quite like Americans, as an American myself.

6

reddituser748397 Mar 26, 2026 +3

Her lips in that thumbnail remind me of Willem Dafoes

3

skilas Mar 27, 2026 +1

I was thinking Cillian Murphy.

1

ILoveRegenHealth Mar 27, 2026 +1

Lips so large it "confused" the crew

1

Impostor1089 Mar 27, 2026 +2

Was this film financed by a bunch of guns?

2

Microwave1213 Mar 26, 2026 +4

I dunno what it is but Lena Headey is just one of those actors where my brain can’t comprehend them playing a different character. Even with a new hair color and accent I still just see Cersei

4

arashi256 Mar 26, 2026 +8

She will always be Sarah Connor to me.

8

Swordf1sh_ Mar 26, 2026 +3

This. But also Queen from 300

3

forever87 Mar 27, 2026 +6

and most importantly Ma-Ma from *dredd* (but also she was in *jungle book* (1994))

6

Swordf1sh_ Mar 27, 2026 +3

A nice reminder to rewatch Dredd 👌

3

Swordf1sh_ Mar 26, 2026 +3

Cobie Smulders is like that for me. A recent casting of hers is perplexing.

3

timmojo Mar 27, 2026 +2

Shrinking?

2

Swordf1sh_ Mar 27, 2026 +1

I see her and think Maria Hill must have gone undercover

1

siraolo Mar 27, 2026 +1

I was half expecting/wishing Nicolas Cage would appear and this being connected to Lord of War.

1

comeback68 Mar 26, 2026 -7

So the ammunition factory job pays enough to cover plastic surgery?

-7

robot_ankles Mar 26, 2026 -2

Plastic surgery DIY kits from Temu

-2

likeonions Mar 27, 2026 -1

it probably would have been a good idea to hire people who know something about guns and ammunition for this movie. or someone who knows how to use google.

-1

Gadoguz994 Mar 27, 2026

Damn Cersei really getting up there

0

Ballistic (2026) | Official Trailer | Lena Headey

💬 Send a Message

113 Comments