· 188 comments · Save ·
Announcements Apr 28, 2010 at 7:24 PM

blog.listnook: We've revamped our sponsored links! [with an explanatory comic by TheOatmeal]

Posted by KeyserSosa



🚩 Report this post

188 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +3
[deleted]
3
KeyserSosa Apr 28, 2010 +9
Baby steps. This version is already much more complicated than the untargeted one, and we wanted to make sure targeting is working as expected before we start breaking bids down into even smaller units. We also figured that if we added that in this version, the natural follow-up would be "but I want to put 2x in listnook.com, 1x in wtf, and 3x in circlejerk!"
9
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +4
The math is hard. If you spend $20 on an ad, targeted at /r/pics and /r/some_obscure\_listnook\_somewhere, what should we do?
4
tulioz Apr 28, 2010 +2
I'd vote let the purchaser decide how much money they want to spend on each one within the order, so they could say hey I want to spend $15 on /r/pics and $5 /r/some_obscure_listnook
2
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +3
Not a bad idea. But let's make sure the plain-vanilla targeting code is working well before we mix things up a little with your raisins and sprinkles.
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +142
[removed]
142
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +50
>I'd hate to think that "print" media can do something that you guys can't... You're gonna be *pissed* when you find out about paper airplanes, boats, and hats.
50
Malgas Apr 29, 2010 +3
Alright guys, it's **internet airplane** time!
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +2
I want an internet hat.
2
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +3
Free hat! Free hat!
3
Mattyi Apr 29, 2010 +2
And I want a boat, m***********. Don't you ever forget.
2
scottynosabe Apr 28, 2010 +49
I support this idea. Too many times I've seen an ad and been like "I don't need this." But then days or weeks later I'm scrambling to find out the name of that site.
49
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +17
[removed]
17
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +9
[deleted]
9
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +4
a....sou...
4
enkideridu Apr 29, 2010 +1
or [hostgator](http://www.listnook.com/comments/bvbm2/hostgator_web_hosting_better_faster_stronger/)
1
christopheles Apr 28, 2010 +2
I upvoted a hosting ad but it didn't go to my liked page so I saved it and that worked. Maybe they've fixed this now.
2
Donlife Apr 28, 2010 +12
As an advertiser who uses listnook ads, I can only give 2 thumbs up to anything that would keep my ad around longer!
12
redwall_hp Apr 28, 2010 +6
That's how ads are supposed to work. They plant the idea of something in your head, so when you need it you'll remember. Where did this idea that they're about tricking you into clicking or buying something come from?
6
FlawedLogic Apr 28, 2010 +4
Most likely all those click here for a free [insert popular item of the time] or shoot [insert major political/celebrity of the time] ads Not to mention everytime someone mentions ad statics they usually mention click-throughs and such.
4
scottynosabe Apr 28, 2010 +3
It doesn't help anyone when I need something and I can't remember what site or company it was.
3
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +3
Yea me too - I often seek out Internet advertisers for fun and adventure. Many times in my life I have seen an Ad for something and then later wished like hell I could find it. I click on everything btw. If it moves, I click on it. I'm actually building a database that tracks Ads I see on websites so that I can go back later and click on them. I have a custom mouse driver that clicks on shit even when I'm sleeping. How much would you guys pay for a database and automatic mouse clicker that tracks all ads?
3
jamt9000 Apr 28, 2010 +10
Here you go http://listnook.com/r/promos/search/?q=promos&sort=new
10
dieselcreek2 Apr 29, 2010 +2
Weird ... "403 Forbidden" for me on the sublistnook home page.
2
TundraWolf_ Apr 29, 2010 +2
Happy birthday, o' hero of half naked women.
2
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +2
[deleted]
2
Tiomaidh Apr 29, 2010 +1
>I'd hate to think that "print" media can do something that you guys can't... Well, now they can't...
1
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +23
Speaking of ads, what's the deal with the couple of really dodgy ones that slipped through the approval process lately? Like the free iPads one?
23
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +26
[deleted]
26
shiduke Apr 28, 2010 +6
Adultfriendfinder was on here too...
6
gfixler Apr 28, 2010 +45
It was quite helpful. I found 2 adult friends.
45
unantimatter Apr 29, 2010 +4
This is sarcasm, so you know listnookads... No one really uses adultfriendfinder to find *friends*.
4
workroom Apr 29, 2010 +8
whoosh?
8
unantimatter Apr 29, 2010 +9
whoosh?!?
9
iHaveNoTeeth Apr 29, 2010 +5
Adult friends give gummers.
5
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +3
Sent.
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +47
[deleted]
47
piderman Apr 29, 2010 +3
I came for http://porkchopmilkshakeinyourmouth.com but it doesn't seem to work :(
3
Digipete Apr 28, 2010 +3
I am guessing that a few also came here for... [r/trailofponyfarts](http://www.listnook.com/r/trailofponyfarts/)
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +9
I really disliked the "slice of pie" format as it was impossible to know what I would be paying per impression (or 1,000), or per click.
9
jedberg Apr 28, 2010 +5
Think of it like buying regular advertising. You spend some amount of money on ads. Either it performs like you want it to or not. Like buying an ad on the radio. You have an estimated audience, but they can't guarantee a cost per listener. Either the ad did what you wanted or it didn't. It's a cost of business.
5
Byeuji Apr 28, 2010 +5
I think it'd be better if you were told what the current ad-market is on listnook, so you can estimate how much it's going to cost you to get a certain percentage of the ad-space. If I buy advertising on TV or Radio, I am told exactly how many times my ad will air and I know for how long it will be airing and during what shows. On listnook, if I put in $200/day from my budget to advertise here, then I have no idea how much ad-space that's going to buy. It could buy 10% ($2000 total/day for listnook ad revenue) or .5% ($40,000/day for listnook ad revenue) I have no idea what your ad revenues are like, but if you're making $2000 a day, and I put in $20/day, that's not going to get me a lot of sponsored ad-space/time. And it will get worse, the more people advertise on listnook. I think it's not too much to ask for an estimate of what a current ad-buy will get me on listnook. You could just put a little % thing next to the money/date box on the campaign page to give me an estimate of what my exposure will be for the dates I specified (as listnook knows it currently). Then I can just monitor that % as long as my campaign lasts, and increase my daily ad-buy if I feel it's insufficient. Edit: >Like buying an ad on the radio. You have an estimated audience, but they can't guarantee a cost per listener. > >Either the ad did what you wanted or it didn't. It's a cost of business. A notable difference in the advertisement styles: You can guarantee a known % of the audience on a radio show will hear the advertisement, and then guess what % of people on that show will act on the ad. On listnook, not everyone is being served the same ad at the same time - only at the same rate. If I buy in a daily amount of 1% of the listnook ad space/time, then I'll get exposed to 1% of the users IF they click through listnook 100 times - and because it's exposing only that person to the ad, not the entire population of listnook at once, the chance of someone clicking on my ad (or using it) is more obfuscated, and I'd expect lower % than a radio ad (for people who don't click listnook 100 times per cycle).
5
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +4
> I think it'd be better if you were told what the current ad-market is on listnook, [You kinda are.](http://www.listnook.com/promoted/graph/)
4
Byeuji Apr 28, 2010 +6
That's useful, but it doesn't tell you how much the ad-budget per day is. In other words, you don't know how much the other advertisers are spending, so you don't know how much of the ad-space you're going to get in ratio to theirs. If I spend $20/day and someone drops $2000 on a day, I'll have completely wasted my ad budget, because his $2000 will destroy the other advertisers' ratios. Obviously, I don't need to know what each individual advertiser is paying (I'm certain that goes against some confidentiality), but it's fine to tell me what the total projected spending for that day will be. Edit: And if I'm missing some way to derive the information I'm looking for from that graph, please enlighten me. I just think advertisers should know what they're going to get, at the risk of losing their money as I described above.
6
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +8
Good point. I'll bring it up at the next meeting of the listnook circle of elders.
8
qgyh2 Apr 29, 2010 +2
Perhaps there could be an option to back out/cancel and reschedule the ad if your ratio goes below a set target / or a minimum no of impressions?
2
Byeuji Apr 28, 2010 +3
Thanks! :)
3
gfixler Apr 28, 2010 +8
What's the minimum amount that can be paid? If I put in $1, am I guaranteed that only one listnookor will ever see it? Can I use this to target ads to lucky winners with whom I hope to become best friends? Any chance we can put something in our ad photo that can be dynamically replaced with the name of the currently signed-in listnookor? Maybe it could just be a pink box that gets replaced with a rendered username in a choice of colors from a palette list on the purchase page. I could put up an ad that says something like: "Hey [jedberg]. That's right, I'm talking to you, and only you in this one-time advertisement. Wanna be besties? PM me! -gfixler" Whoever had the luck of the draw would see my ad and know they had a place forever in my world, and in my heart.
8
qgyh2 Apr 29, 2010 +2
I think the minimum is either $20 or $30.
2
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +2
There is a very reasonable estimate on what the radio audience will be. It's not a c*** shoot. And if there was a large variance in the audience due to lower than expected listeners, the advertiser receives a make-good.
2
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +2
I agree, it's a horrible format. Ex: Myself and another person pays $100, and we each get 50% of the total impressions. I decide to spend another $100 a different day, and 9 other people randomly pick that same day too. Suddenly I'm getting 10% of the impressions for the same price I was getting 50%. You never know what to spend, because $100 could get you 100% of the audience, or 1% of the audience, and it changes everyday. Why not charge by impressions? Find a good balance for cost per impression, and just keep a simple count when each ad is displayed. It's completely fair, and everyone knows exactly what they're getting, and how it should convert.
2
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +1
Yea, I was really surprised at [the response I got from jedberg](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/bxeer/bloglistnook_weve_revamped_our_sponsored_links_with/c0p1seg). It started out sounding like someone that had no experience with or understanding of advertising and then ended up somewhat unprofessional.
1
qgyh2 Apr 29, 2010 +1
You can get a rough idea [here](http://www.listnook.com/promoted/graph/).
1
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +1
It's just not usable info. Advertisers need to be able to control costs. That gives a range for the past week, but as you can see, today's CPM more than doubles anything before it, which if I was spending real money would be disastrous to my ad budget.
1
bkdeamon Apr 29, 2010 +6
What happens when a big brand comes in, has a budget of $10,000 and Mr low budget comes in and wants to spend $500 and then Mr I want to try Listnook with my pocket money comes in and spends $100....? Surely the $100 is going to get a VERY VERY small return on his investment, if any. Whereas if mr big budget wasn't there...it would be a huge return .I'm sorry...maybe I'm just not understanding it right but the system doesn't make sense to me.
6
MindStalker Apr 29, 2010 +4
Mr big budget would be an idiot to spend $10,000 when you get a very high percent of ads for $100 a day.
4
britishben Apr 29, 2010 +1
But he would guarantee a huge number of impressions. If some dude selling kitty sweaters posts an ad for $100, and Microsoft decides to drop $a bajillion on listnook ads, two things are going to happen: a) listnook staff relocates to the bahamas, and b) Mr. Kitty Sweaters gets screwed, hard.
1
MindStalker Apr 29, 2010 +1
Listnook would most likely assign them to the side image ad, and keep the regular ads flowing
1
demeteloaf Apr 28, 2010 +21
If I wasn't at work right now, I would so check out/start /r/LaserPenises and /r/BBQSauceNipples
21
ElDiablo666 Apr 28, 2010 +24
Laser Penises: a community for 5 years.
24
americanhipster Apr 28, 2010 +24
Wow, Google really likes listnook. You posted that comment 3 minutes ago and it's already a [top result](http://imgur.com/mVCHA.jpg) for "Laser Penises" (with quotes).
24
hylje Apr 28, 2010 +27
Google even indexes *4chan* to some success.
27
Bit_4 Apr 28, 2010 +9
But not even the mighty Google can tame the wild 4chan.
9
ElDiablo666 Apr 28, 2010 +2
Holy laser penises Batman!
2
Booster21 Apr 28, 2010 +6
badge employ pie squash meeting thought roof steep coordinated cooing *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev/home)*
6
americanhipster Apr 28, 2010 +16
Have no fear, [LaserTits are here](http://www.listnook.com/r/LaserTits/)! EDIT: THIS JUST IN: Holy shit! I made that sublistnook but it turns out there's actually [an entire site dedicated to this](http://www.lazertits.com/).
16
Rantingbeerjello Apr 29, 2010 +2
I...f******...love...the...INTERNET!!!
2
ketralnis Apr 28, 2010 +6
The world was just not ready for it yet
6
BonKerZ Apr 28, 2010 +20
>Two weeks. I **f******** love this movie.
20
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +4
[See you at the party, Richter!](http://seeyouatthepartyrichter.com)
4
RedditCommentAccount Apr 29, 2010 +1
How ridiculous is it that we have web sites dedicated to one video clip. Or sound. Or whatever.
1
DEADB33F Apr 29, 2010 +2
Hah, I read the blog post five minutes ago, and am now three minutes into the movie.
2
gregshortall Apr 29, 2010 +2
[TWO WEEKS](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V17duGlHEYY)
2
GiantBatFart Apr 28, 2010 +25
In case anyone was wondering, it takes around 10 days for [hot dogs to begin growing white fur](http://www.listnook.com/r/pics/comments/bxfmh/my_girlfriend_constructed_a_listnook_alien_out_of/). -The Oatmeal
25
Bornhuetter Apr 28, 2010 +20
Thanks again for keeping the ads unobtrusive.
20
dchestnykh Apr 28, 2010 +8
Is it still only available for US advertisers?
8
ketralnis Apr 28, 2010 +24
Sadly, yes, we require a US credit card to pay for it :( The lawyers aren't yet familiar with this concept of "other countries"
24
masklinn Apr 28, 2010 +8
That's seriously bizarre, why not go with "hey you have a visa or a mastercard? We want your money" as almost everybody else does? Credit card fees?
8
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +9
Legal exposure.
9
psilokan Apr 28, 2010 +1
You can offer something like paypal, where you have no clue where the funds came from?
1
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +4
The law doesn't care whether or not you know where the funds came from. The law cares where the funds came from.
4
greenskin Apr 28, 2010 +11
Dudes, I've been wanting to spend some good money here... get this working, OK?
11
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +20
Our programming powers are useless against lawyers.
20
ketralnis Apr 28, 2010 +10
Our traversers can't recurse DAGs of this structure!
10
Bit_4 Apr 28, 2010 +4
Have tried typing at them _really loudly_?
4
gfixler Apr 28, 2010 +2
I am willing to work as a go between. Just give me your bank account information and I will make a transfer to my account here in the US. From there we can talk ads, or whatever you're into.
2
bryn Apr 29, 2010 +4
You seem legit.
4
sgorf Apr 29, 2010 +1
Understood, but to help you get some numbers to wave at your lawyers: I'm a UK user who was accepted in the beta but am still waiting to give you my money.
1
wryall Apr 29, 2010 +1
Out of interest, anybody tried one of those travel cards that can be put in USD? Also I can get a US based credit card even though I don't live in the US nor have I ever stepped foot their - so your lawyers reasoning for not allowing international publishers doesn't seem like it would hold out.
1
jxf Apr 28, 2010 +13
With this new revenue stream, maybe Listnook can finally buy enough high-grade cocaine to fuel a coding o*** that results in an awesome and useful internal search engine! Or I guess they could just buy the coke and skip that other stuff.
13
Mulsanne Apr 28, 2010 +4
spoken like someone who has not tried the search engine at all in the last month. It works now
4
CaptSpify_is_Awesome Apr 29, 2010 +2
Really? Every time I try (this week) it says something along the lines of "our servers are too busy, try again later..."
2
guitarromantic Apr 28, 2010 +47
Upvoted for "follow the trail of pony farts". What other site uses that in its advertising policy?
47
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +76
MSNBC.
76
redwall_hp Apr 28, 2010 +3
>In this major revision, we've added the ability to target specific listnooks (and the subscribers thereof) as well as the ability to extend links. Yes! Now it might actually be useful for some of us!
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +5
[deleted]
5
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +8
We love you too, but our revenue is what Conde Nast looks to when deciding whether to let us hire, keep us the way we are, or shut the site down as a failed project. So far, nobody's come up with a better business plan, but if you have some ideas, we're all ears. (Except "listnook subscriptions!" and "listnook donation box!" .. we've already considered and rejected those.)
8
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +2
[deleted]
2
hueypriest Apr 28, 2010 +6
Funny you mentioned saturday morning cartoons considering that many (but not all) of them were in fact ads for toys.
6
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +5
[deleted]
5
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +7
Yeah, but it's not like they were all just ads for toys.. I mean, consider G.I. Joe. Er, I mean He-Man. Oh, that is, uh, Rainbow Brite. My Little Pony? Saturday Supercade? Damn. Even the cartoons were infomercials.
7
sblinn Apr 29, 2010 +1
> listnook subscriptions First, I think the targeted self-serve ads are a good step in the right direction. (As in another thread being able to target more than one listnook, etc.) Second, why not both? Why not have subscriptions which enable more features, such as "disable promoted links" and give (optional) user page badges, etc.
1
westofthewest Apr 28, 2010 +17
How much did The Oatmeal get for this illustration?
17
MajesticTowerOfHats Apr 28, 2010 +17
Several n*** photos and a signed bacon rasher.
17
workroom Apr 29, 2010 +3
wow, I was gonna make a joke about a "bacon rash" by taking a rash photo and photoshopping it into the shape of bacon, but then I googled "rash" and now.. umm... not feeling so funny anymore.
3
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +9
Isn't that sort of like asking me how much Conde Nast pays me to write code for listnook?
9
bnelson Apr 29, 2010 +3
Well....how much do they pay you? :-P
3
davelog Apr 29, 2010 +2
I heard they all get paid in magazine subscriptions.
2
Rantingbeerjello Apr 29, 2010 +1
Although I'm not much of a programmer, I'd write code in exchange for subs to Wired, The New Yorker and GQ (hey, a geek's gotta learn how to dress sometime...)
1
raldi Apr 29, 2010 +2
[Wired is $10/year](http://www.amazon.com/Wired-1-year/dp/B00005N7TL), [The New Yorker is $40/year](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005N7T5/), and [GQ is $12/year](http://www.amazon.com/GQ-1-year/dp/B00005N7QI). Not to brag, but I *do* get paid more than $62/year.
2
Rantingbeerjello Apr 29, 2010 +2
I'm Canadian - quadruple all those prices
2
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +10
As much as he deserves, I hope. A few sound kicks to the temple and a lecture on how to create inspired, considered and humorous content.
10
SUCK_MY_FUCK Apr 29, 2010 +3
UPVOTED THIS SO HARD.
3
TheSausageKing Apr 29, 2010 +4
I know using vulgar comics to explain things is all the rage for techno-hipsters, but that comic was 1) not funny and 2) harder to read than the blog post.
4
littlekittycat Apr 29, 2010 +2
That's why the blog post was there. So you could choose either.
2
psilokan Apr 28, 2010 +2
I think the $20 min is kinda lame when you're targeting by listnook. That means if I pick some obscure listnook that gets little traffic I'm just throwing away cash. I have a couple niche websites that have sublistnooks for the topic but get maybe 1 post every 2 months. It should simply be a bid system in that case.
2
ImLyingWhenISay Apr 28, 2010 +22
God, the oatmeal is terminally un-funny. Pony farts? The only part mildly amusing was the wolverine chasing the children.
22
strolls Apr 28, 2010 +23
Unfortunately and due to your username, I am uncertain of whether to up- or down-vote this comment.
23
ImLyingWhenISay Apr 28, 2010 +8
I get that a lot.
8
starkinter Apr 28, 2010 +19
OR DO YOU
19
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +4
Why is listnook enlisting the aid of the Dane Cook of webcomics?
4
ImLyingWhenISay Apr 29, 2010 +3
I dislike Dane Cook a great deal. +1
3
MattProspect19 Apr 28, 2010 +2
This is awesome. I have had tremendous success with your sponsored links and was hoping sub-listnook advertising would be next. Continuous campaigns will also be a huge help, it saddened me every time my sponsored link finished and I knew all those great comments were lost forever.
2
BlackCloud1711 Apr 28, 2010 +3
Not to sound like a spelling nazi, but targeting only has two 'T's in it, not "targetting".
3
nirreskeya Apr 28, 2010 +8
I'm a little disappointed that porkchopmilkshakes.com isn't a live site yet.
8
megadeus Apr 28, 2010 +8
_yet._
8
sirspate Apr 29, 2010 +1
I suspect it's only a matter of time before a bunch of ads for porkchop milkshakes start appearing on listnook, live site or not..
1
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +11
> tldr: oh look! here's a [web comic](http://www.listnook.com/selfserviceoatmeal)! Heh.
11
mrjoshzombie Apr 28, 2010 +38
I want the oatmeal to narrate *my life*
38
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +33
[deleted]
33
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +23
Freeman: "Follow the trail of pony farts to your pork chop milkshake..." ...?
23
hackysack Apr 28, 2010 +18
Morgan Freeman made that sound glorious.
18
MorganFreemansVoice Apr 28, 2010 +12
Everyone wants me to narrate their life. My inner monologue is beautiful.
12
bmatul Apr 28, 2010 +13
I'd prefer the announcer from NBA Jam...
13
cigerect Apr 28, 2010 +8
RAZZLE DAZZLE!
8
drtyfrnk Apr 28, 2010 +5
HE'S ON FIRE!
5
dropkickdog Apr 28, 2010 +6
You know on second thought...
6
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +3
Is it the shoes!?
3
nirreskeya Apr 28, 2010 +1
I've said the same about Noah Baumbach and he's still my first pick, but I know what you mean.
1
spazmaster Apr 28, 2010 +2
This is a great feature, but do you still only support US credit cards when paying for ad space on listnook? I would love to run ads on listnook but can't till you change this....hopefully soon?
2
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +1
http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/bxeer/bloglistnook_weve_revamped_our_sponsored_links_with/c0p1erb
1
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +2
[deleted]
2
jedberg Apr 28, 2010 +3
Advertise on Saturday. Traffic is only about 20% lower, but no one does it.
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +2
So I was sad that [/r/KeyserSosaPlayground](http://www.listnook.com/r/keysersosaplayground "off limits, sad trombone sound") was forbidden.
2
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +4
[deleted]
4
jedberg Apr 28, 2010 +3
I've been responding, and explaining that it is ad revenue that keeps this site free for our users.
3
GuruMeditation Apr 28, 2010 +3
[Meatshakes, as seen on TV!](http://www.aquateencentral.com/epguide/images/screenshots/robositter/full/robositter33.jpg)
3
phelonius Apr 28, 2010 +4
[Lies!](http://porkchopmilkshakeinyourmouth.com/)
4
GiantBatFart Apr 28, 2010 +11
I just tried to register it but someone snapped out from under me. They better sell porkchop milkshakes on there, god damnit. -oats
11
jedberg Apr 28, 2010 +8
That would be me. :) As soon as the whois info filters though, it will point to something cool.
8
gfixler Apr 28, 2010 +2
Still hoping for a porkchop milkshake, though. -hall
2
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +1
Actual question-- the amount of money you're spending determines the % of chance your ad gets viewed that day, right? Is that determined by the whole of listnook, or only targeted listnooks? I.e.: Advertisers are spending $200/day on listnook total, you pay $10/day so you get 5%, **or** advertisers spend $200/day on listnook total, but you only want your ad to show up in the "business" sublistnook, where advertisers are spending $50/day-- would $10/day get you 5% or 20%?
1
randomb0y Apr 28, 2010 +2
You've also seemed to have revamped something about your potential spammer detection algorythms ... can't even post two coments in quick succession anymore. :(( A 10 minute time-out is just too much.
2
deserted Apr 28, 2010 +1
Once a user get a few hundred karma or a few thousand comment karma that should really stop, and I suspect your case is a fluke. You're obviously a dedicated and h******* listnookor, if I don't have noticeable restrictions you certainly shouldn't.
1
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +3
The real karma thresholds are much more lenient than the numbers you give.
3
littlekittycat Apr 29, 2010 +1
Yes and thank you for that. I may not comment every day or in every article, but in a thread like this one it is awesome to be able to comment multiple times, even with my relatively low karma.
1
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +10
[deleted]
10
ascendant23 Apr 29, 2010 +1
So, what if I wanted to advertise on listnook in a slightly different way. Let's say instead of choosing a sublistnook, I wanted to choose a search term that somebody was using in the search engine? Could be a whole new revenue stream... of course you'd need to fix the search engine first, but.... :)
1
hngovr Apr 29, 2010 +2
Great. Now tell your [mods](http://www.listnook.com/r/whatofsaydrah/comments/bxljn/another_mod_submitting_for_profit/) to stop submitting advertising links....
2
slaorta Apr 28, 2010 +3
i am currently debating whether or not to purchase porkchopmilkshakeinyourmouth.com and forward it to lemonparty...
3
KirkWylie Apr 29, 2010 +2
So I see I'm not the only one who immediately went to porkchopmilkshakeinyourmouth.com to see if there was more cleverness therein.
2
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +7
Christ, The Oatmeal is one talented m***********. Great stuff on this one. :D
7
workroom Apr 29, 2010 +2
Nice try, Oatmeal creator going by pseudonym.
2
rDr4g0n Apr 28, 2010 +3
step 6 in the comic reads "One approved" where it should prolly be "Once approved". Do I get something nao?
3
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 -2
Big surprise. I called out TheOatmeal for being a listnook shill when every single comic he shit out made it to the front page, regardless of whether it was good or not,...and now look at this, he's making comics for the site. Saydrah shit all over again, and it runs deep.
-2
starkinter Apr 28, 2010 +12
While I'm not the biggest Oatmeal fan, this is a pretty stupid conspiracy theory.
12
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +1
The revamping seems to have fucked up the hide-feature. The submission at the very top of the front page says "hidden" when you click on "hide", but it's not gone until you reload. That's different for all other submissions listed there.
1
workroom Apr 29, 2010 +2
Now I want a porkchop milkshake.
2
TheLawofGravity Apr 28, 2010
TheOatmeal has certainly taken gaming the system via "gaining community acceptance" to a level Saydrah never even dreamed of.
0
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +31
We've never found any indication that he's cheating, or misrepresenting himself, or asking friends to go vote for his stuff, or abusing a position, or anything like that. He just makes comics that appeal to listnook, and then submits them. And then real, human, non-affiliated users vote them up because they genuinely enjoy them. What exactly are you accusing him of? Being popular?
31
willis77 Apr 28, 2010 +16
That's exactly what TheOatmeal would say if Saydrah used her admin css hack to grant him entry to MercurialMadnessMan's raldisphere. Nice try, TheOatmeal.
16
GiantBatFart Apr 28, 2010 +5
Willis77 is onto me. I use SEO and CSS to hack listnook. I am totes hax 4 sure.
5
ymrhawk Apr 28, 2010 +3
I was a real big fan of the TheOatmeal and really dug his work however his twitter posts have revealed him to be a huge a******.
3
willis77 Apr 28, 2010 +15
Who is Saydrah?
15
ReaverXai Apr 28, 2010 +2
Can I use it from Canada yet?
2
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +1
Dude. That is clearly a picture of a [Tasmanian devil](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasmanian_Devil), not a [wolverine](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolverine).
1
Coriform Apr 28, 2010 +2
Unfortunately (for advertisers), in compressed view, I do not see sponsored links.
2
ketralnis Apr 28, 2010 +4
You and the three people still using that view
4
raldi Apr 28, 2010 +3
[Official statistics to back that up](http://www.listnook.com/r/announcements/comments/bnskk/youve_just_been_drafted/c0noiqk?context=1)
3
BlackCloud1711 Apr 28, 2010 +3
I'd never heard of compressed view before now. It makes me want to puke.
3
mattsilv Apr 28, 2010 +1
It was worth reading that whole thing purely for seeing [that woman](http://www.i-mockery.com/minimocks/total-recall/10.jpg) from total recall.
1
lordkoba Apr 28, 2010 +1
I never understood why he made that scene at the spaceport. Did the mask malfunction or what?
1
netfool Apr 29, 2010 +1
If TheOatmeal (the TheOatmeal?) made textbooks I would still be an idiot, but I would be an entertained idiot. But seriously I read that entire thing even though I have no interest in using a sponsored link just because it was made by TheOatmeal.
1
[deleted] Apr 28, 2010 +5
how much was oatmeal paid to do this webcomic.
5
Swayze Apr 29, 2010 +1
Thanks listnook! it was a good run, but this topped with a comic explaining to us in retard-speak the new changes for the user that can't read normal writing, by that most gracious moron GiantBatFart is that last straw. Stay classy!
1
superdug Apr 29, 2010 +1
Please please please please tell me /r/circlejerk is one of the communities!
1
enkideridu Apr 29, 2010 +1
Why is blog.listnook.com blocked in China?! I want to read Oatmeal comic :(
1
[deleted] Apr 29, 2010 +2
[The Oatmeal comic is here](http://www.listnook.com/selfserviceoatmeal)
2
← Back to Board