This is the same part of Indiana as the newly proposed Bears stadium....
1874
GruGruxLobMar 18, 2026
+472
Mike Braun is a Nazi
472
muegleMar 18, 2026
+59
Da Bears want to move to f****** Indiana???
59
TheMadQuackerMar 18, 2026
+124
Yeah. They are pissed that Illinois won't use taxpayer money to build their new Arlington stadium so they are threatening (maybe actually will) that they will move out of state.
124
Guac_in_my_rarriMar 18, 2026
+60
The site the bears want is a super fund site. They don't have the money to clean up that site.
60
cutthemalarky87Mar 18, 2026
+56
They definitely have the money. As a season ticket holder the prices went up 20 percent not the advertised 11-13percent.
56
Guac_in_my_rarriMar 18, 2026
+10
No, the bears do not age Superfund money site clean up **and** stadium. They barely have stadium money as it is.
10
goblueMMar 18, 2026
+14
don't worry, Indiana just relaxed their environmental regs again, it won't be an issue on their part
14
Guac_in_my_rarriMar 18, 2026
+3
Lolol did they really? Why am I not surprised
3
CharcoalGreyWolfMar 18, 2026
+3
So, the Gary Bears?
Will they add a third eye to the mascot?
3
blowfish257Mar 18, 2026
+4
Under appreciated comment my good sir
4
TheMadQuackerMar 18, 2026
+17
I still don't understand why they even want a new stadium. Soldier Field is plenty nice.
17
trojan_man16Mar 18, 2026
+36
They want to own their stadium so they can take all the revenue. They also want to have an entertainment complex around the stadium.
It’s why they completely gave up on the city. There’s not a lot of space in the city, plus they want the city to pay for part of the stadium and infrastructure upgrades.
The Arlington Heights site would have provided that opportunity, but the state and Arlington heights did not want to pay for the infrastructure or give them tax breaks.
Indiana then bent over backwards to give them a package.
As for Soldier, to me if your whole purpose of going to an event there is the event it’s a fine venue. But for some reason people need every event to be an “experience” and yes Soldier does not offer the modern stadium experience, whatever that means. It’s also hell to drive in for game day, so you see suburbanites in the Chicago sub constantly whining about it, even though the stadium is right downtown and has decent train access within a 20 minute walk.
36
Guac_in_my_rarriMar 18, 2026
+10
It's not that the city doesn't have the space, they do, the bears are unwilling to put in the effort to make their idea work.
10
trojan_man16Mar 18, 2026
+3
The current lakefront space does not fit the monstrosity the Bears want to replace Soldier for. They could have moved them to the 78 or the former Lincoln Yards site, so the real estate does exist- but the Bears don’t control those sites either.
3
Guac_in_my_rarriMar 18, 2026
+6
Yep, like I said, the bears are unwilling to make the current situation work.
The fire are building a stadium and district along the river in a spot that would have been perfect. The sox are looking at a new spot too. Imo, Sox and fire should share districts. Idk if the bears would fit there.
Edit: Lincoln yards would be a great spot for the bears. There's enough shops that need help along clyborn or empty shops that would be available for new business.
6
SkunkMonkeyMar 18, 2026
+12
Probably not enough luxury suites.
12
h3rp3rMar 18, 2026
+16
"Those other billionaires got taxpayers to pay for their new stadiums! Why don't we scrap our stadium to get the taxpayers to build us a shiny new stadium?"
16
TheGreatGamer1389Mar 18, 2026
+3
Then I'll switch teams that I root for then. Maby I'll starting buying Saints merch.
3
the_guy_who_sleeps_Mar 18, 2026
+55
? I'm not following the connection
55
LauflouyaMar 18, 2026
+370
The rich are eating the people and we're all just sitting back saying how disgusting it is.
370
geologicalnoiseMar 18, 2026
+22
I do get it. But I also think we fail to realize that once that genie is out of the bottle, literally no one has any idea how it ever goes back in, and that is a terrifying prospect.
Like, once we cross that line, the violence won't just magically stop. Even if we get everything we want. Once something is "proven to work", people stop caring about why it might have been necessary in the first place.
22
Upset_Development_64Mar 18, 2026
+32
> the violence won't just magically stop.
Maybe not immediately, but eventually it will.
*gestures at 1945-2016*
32
Pedrov80Mar 18, 2026
+22
The only difference between 1960 and 2016 is that the violence finally came home. America is doing to itself what it's done to the world for a century.
22
Eighth_EveMar 18, 2026
+8
I used to have an old Life magazine with pictures of machine gun nests outside a detroit auto factory 1945. Troops coming home as an organized experienced army waned their jobs back and a nice fat raise. And they had the gear and know-how to fight for it. The strike lasted 3 days and wages were tripled.
8
pixeltackleMar 17, 2026
+3418
> BP "will lock out approximately 800 United Steelworkers members from its 440,000 barrel-per-day Whiting, Indiana, refinery"
That will help with the gas prices for sure!
3418
Memory_LessMar 17, 2026
+1128
A little profit gouging the public.
1128
pixeltackleMar 17, 2026
+389
Squeeze the workers & the public at the great time. Go BP!
389
Distinct-Winner-6117Mar 18, 2026
+101
It’s shocking from a company with their reputation
101
Big_pekkaMar 18, 2026
+9
Yeah, they’re not even American
9
sviridootMar 18, 2026
+6
Don't forget the pelicans!
6
Euler007Mar 18, 2026
+96
Probably running the refinery on a skeleton crew, non union staffers working nonstop. I assume no turnaround was planned in the spring.
96
jasn98Mar 18, 2026
+165
Skeleton crew? We union guys call them SCABS!
165
Altruistic-Cut9795Mar 18, 2026
+74
SCABS and their names will be forever posted on The Wall of Shame.
Teamster here
74
SouthOfTheNorthPoleMar 18, 2026
+52
It's the English Oligarch way. I'm currently watching Sherwood, based on Thatcher's treatment of the mining union's members. Murderous b****. Same time Reagan was firing all the air traffic controllers. F*** BP. F*** Thatcher. F*** Reagan.
52
DudeDeudaruuMar 18, 2026
+22
They're rats. They aren't scabs until they cross a picket line.
This vocab was part of my IBEW training
22
Muslim_WookieMar 18, 2026
+2
Why are they rats just for not being part of a union?
Downvotes aren't an answer.
2
Jolly_Recording_4381Mar 18, 2026
+6
Unions are about collective power if you have workers outside of it it takes away the power so the can do shit like this and keep operating. If there were no rats they couldn't lock out the union without shutting down and loosing money.
6
Muslim_WookieMar 18, 2026
Is there any circumstance in which someone can be not part of the union?
0
Thelonius_DunkMar 18, 2026
+5
If you're a salaried role at a unionized plant, like engineer, supervisor, ops manager, accounting, HR, etc you will not be part of the union 99% of the time. If you're in an hourly role like operator, or mechanic, or forklift driver, you likely will be in the union. In some cases you might be able to opt out as hourly, but that depends on state rules and how the local contract is setup.
5
GanjakeMar 18, 2026
+5
You can always not be in a union. You have to pay dues and such to be a member and can leave at any time. It's not a governmental or regulatory obligation.
But then you risk being a rat, scab, and f****** over your own likelihood in the process.
The only time it's beneficial to not be in a union is in at will state. At will employment means they can fire you for any reason at any time. This includes trying to unionize. What usually happens is a movement will start, they will then fire those employees, and any employees that were thinking about joining now will not in fear for their jobs.
5
JackBlackBowserSlapsMar 18, 2026
+3
Not being in the union, but taking the union’s work.
3
phiacMar 18, 2026
+32
education for the uninformed:
[What is a turnaround?](https://youtu.be/2gCk9yBBOUo)
32
TheScrote1Mar 18, 2026
+7
Kind of want to start a refinery now just for some turnarounds
7
slothactual69Mar 18, 2026
+5
That video ruled but I assure you they do not rule in real life.
5
OakroscoeMar 18, 2026
+5
What, you don’t like the chaos of working 13 and 1s while a thousand random contractors f*** up shit outside messing with god knows what and then trying to start up and get back on spec without blowing up half the county?
5
slothactual69Mar 18, 2026
+5
The contractors are a problem. I work in the lab and a dude who didnt speak English decided the laboratory was the best place to deliver a semi full of pipes to at 2am so he could get out of there.
5
tetrahedralMar 18, 2026
+15
HUGE… tracts of land
15
Sw1nd3nMar 18, 2026
+4
I can’t believe this is a corporate training video! What a HUGE investment in learning systems!
4
Muslim_WookieMar 18, 2026
+2
Hey so as someone that know's a little bit behind the scenes this was on purpose. It's a great way to get the attention of the majority of your audience. No shame on the audience, or the presenter.
2
Father_DowlingMar 18, 2026
+2
I had to do both human trafficking and environmental safety courses every year that included such things as not pouring motor oil down the company drain, and insuring no toxic chemicals were unlabeled in the broom closet at our software company.
2
jellifercuzMar 18, 2026
+3
No maintenance workers would be hard on a refinery, I’d think. You can’t just mothball the thing overnight.
3
OakroscoeMar 18, 2026
+4
They don’t want staff maintenance guys. They want to cut those jobs and use contractors from other companies.
4
IAMA_Plumber-AMAMar 18, 2026
+7
"What if, instead of inflation we had like, double inflation?"
"More rubber stamps"
7
topscreenMar 18, 2026
+210
That's the plan, they're making money hand over first right now. Oil barrel prices are up, but all the gas we're buying was bought at pre-war prices. They gotta milk it.
210
AliegesMar 18, 2026
+14
And oil prices won’t rise as much as you would think because of the reduction in refining capacity. And refineries using sub-optimal feed stocks go much slower also. So the demand to buy the oil will drop.
The flip side is there won’t be enough gasoline and diesel/jet fuel, so refinery crack spread is going to increase massively.
14
GroundbreakingLaw149Mar 18, 2026
+6
Wouldn’t they just move it further south to Oklahoma or the Gulf for refining? I know Whiting is massive but can one refinery really suppress the price of WCS or w/e, and the price of oil overall?
Genuine question, I only have some actual real life experience with pipelines. I might just be misunderstanding you though
6
Defiant-Plantain1873Mar 18, 2026
+2
BP is a very mediocre oil producer and an exceptionally good energy trader. I would doubt that BP are making hand over fist from oil prices.
2
JJiggy13Mar 18, 2026
+20
Any BP union member who voted for trump got what they voted for. If that union leader did not endorse Kamala then the union was dumb as f*** to not remove and replace them.
20
lopey986Mar 18, 2026
+19
FWIW United Steelworkers (the union in question) endorsed Joe Biden for reelection. I don't know if they endorsed Kamala once Joe dropped out or if the local made a different endorsement.
19
GivesNoForksMar 18, 2026
+9
They did. I’ve still got pamphlets.
9
red08171Mar 18, 2026
+10
North west Indiana is very blue.
10
prz3124Mar 18, 2026
+12
It is but in my experience union workers around these parts are not very bright and would definitely vote for Trump.
12
Oracle_of_AgesMar 18, 2026
+7
I’ve told this story before. But I live in a pretty rural area. It relies pretty heavily on a Chicken Processing Plant to keep the economy alive. Super conservative and poor area.
There is no union.
I was sitting in Walmart and listening to these 2 ladies talking about their husband’s issues with the plant. They wanted literally everything a union could do. But the younger of the two brought up it sounds like a union. And they both looked disgusted and said they don’t want a union.
It’s just Obamacare again. They don’t know what they want. They just hear a trigger word and melt down. Even though it’s exactly what they are asking for.
7
colemon1991Mar 18, 2026
+4
Yep. I know the type. Key words are bad because they were told so. That's hard to undo. Unfortunately, they can't have it both ways: union or non-union. And if they aren't getting protections from the feds or state, they need a union.
4
Thelonius_DunkMar 18, 2026
+5
I've worked in NW Indiana quite some time and unfortunately it's culture war > class war overe here for an unfortunately large amount of unionized workers in the trades and manufacturing.
5
HoratioPornBlowerMar 18, 2026
+4
It makes me want to pull my f****** hair out that people are too stupid to see that that mindset is by design.
4
theantigMar 18, 2026
+3
Surely the man of the people will step forward and protect his voters…. Oh wait he will be golfing or calling newscum president? (Yes I know… that’s how he said it)
3
TdodoublegMar 18, 2026
+4
Damn, how could the oil compa- democrats do such a thing!
4
Warcraft_FanMar 18, 2026
+2
Already hitting $4 a gallon around Michigan thanks to Iran war. BP being greedy is sure to make the price reach $4.50 or $5
2
Sweetwill62Mar 18, 2026
+2
Looks like BP is saying that the CEO and shareholders are unable to be given any money if they can't afford to pay those workers. Tis a shame really, hope the stock price doesn't go down too much since they clearly don't have enough money to pay those people.
2
BmorewiserMar 18, 2026
+3
There’s less oil to refine. 2 birds, one stone.
3
xShooKMar 18, 2026
+10
~~It's fine if you're union is willing to loan union scabs. What a f****** joke USW.~~
10
gilbs24Mar 18, 2026
+18
Where did you hear or read that. It doesn’t say anything in the article about that.
18
xShooKMar 18, 2026
+20
I'm an idiot.
"The company has told maintenance workers at the Whiting plant to not report for work after Tuesday, and other union-represented workers to work through March 18."
I took this to mean other USW workers would be in the 18th.
20
SourFixMar 18, 2026
+863
Cocksuckers take in billions and get stingy with the crumbs falling off their laps. F*** BP. Pieces of shit.
863
EntertainmentDue5749Mar 18, 2026
+80
BP have a history of making it worse for themselves. So I have my fingers crossed this will screw them over and that the employees get what they want
80
Krumm34Mar 18, 2026
+3
"We're sorry, so sorry. Sorryyyyyy"
3
Im_better_than__uMar 17, 2026
+1148
Only cops can have unions...
1148
ni_hao_butchesMar 17, 2026
+520
Immunity, unions, and punisher stickers.
520
vegetamanMar 17, 2026
+164
Don’t forget carve outs and exemptions from pesky things like gun laws!!
164
explosivecrateMar 17, 2026
+50
It's always good to remember that without resolving our other issues as a nation, draconian gun laws mean only cops and friends of cops will be able to have guns.
50
DarklySaltedMar 18, 2026
+42
Bud, you can have a gun now, but if you do anything with it that a cop doesn't want, they kill you anyway
42
akpenguinMar 18, 2026
+19
Lautenberg Amendment - prevents domestic abusers from owning/possessing firearms.
In the military, it will disqualify you from deployments.
It's estimated that 20-40% of cops nationwide are domestic abusers. That's a lot of exceptions.
19
Im_better_than__uMar 17, 2026
+41
Paid vacations while investigating themselves is a nice bonus.
41
move_machineMar 18, 2026
+3
In many states, they also get home and car loans at cheaper rates that beat the market by 2% or more.
3
EBBBBBBBBBBBBMar 18, 2026
+111
this is because cops aren't workers, they're the domestic arm of the ruling class's imperialist military
111
Im_better_than__uMar 18, 2026
+16
The domestic arm of the ruling class that U.S. citizens subsidize.
16
PrzedrzagMar 18, 2026
+7
There’s a reason they’re all branded as “fraternal orders”
7
strugglzMar 18, 2026
+9
I'm starting to think they should be the only ones without.
9
Previous-Height4237Mar 18, 2026
+4
Personal opinion is all public sector unions should be banned from political activity or face dissolution.
4
bartz824Mar 18, 2026
+354
So, $8.00/gal gas then instead of $5.00/gal?
354
copropnumaMar 18, 2026
+86
So, $8.00/gal gas instead of $5.00/gal because some billionaires need to make a few million more.
86
Neat-Bridge3754Mar 18, 2026
+45
To be fair, $8/gallon is more in line with what gas *should* cost without the obscene subsidies.
Bring it on. Americans are too f****** stupid to be proactive about their energy security, so maybe a little time with a taste of reality will wake us up.
Haha, who am I kidding. We won't learn shit.
45
Twelve2375Mar 18, 2026
+11
All I know is I NEED a bigger truck! Forward thinking at all be damned, if my truck isn’t the biggest in the WalMart parking lot, it’s not doing its job!
11
BoJackMolemanMar 18, 2026
+3
Every time
Question: and what did we learn?
Collectively: Nooooooothing.
3
GroundbreakingLaw149Mar 18, 2026
+2
It’s Chicago and Milwaukee that will really feel it. They have a completely different gas standard than anywhere else in the area and Whiting is one of the few refiners.
2
PigFarmer1Mar 17, 2026
+497
Another excuse to raise prices at the pump. Oil companies need to be regulated just like utilities.
497
Never-Compliant6969Mar 18, 2026
+158
If I were running for president, a big part of my platform would be to nationalize the oil industry over ten years so it can be phased down slowly without resistance from executives or propaganda from lobbyists. It’ll mean cheaper gas for everyone because we won’t be paying for c-suites, lobbying, campaign funding, dividends, etc. It’ll also ease the transition to renewables because it won’t be an industry fighting for its life, but rather running according to the plan. Gotta buy the profiteers out. Sort of a corporate eminent domain, for the good of the public.
158
soulbrotha1Mar 18, 2026
+157
I wonder how they would jfk you
157
mimisiku159Mar 18, 2026
+86
He just wouldn’t win. Big money would be against him and it would be easy to turn the populace against this socialist policy. A policy like this is much further left than any political party in the US.
86
hasslefreeMar 18, 2026
+12
They don't need extravagant executions when they can deny you Healthcare, raise food/ gas/ housing costs beyond reach, make jobs unavailable, and have paramilitary snatch squads abduct citizens and immigrants alike.
Toss in some natural disasters, imminent terror threats from pissed off victims, and neutered government warning and response systems, and we're all one hiccup away from being 'jfk'd by "circumstances" while struggling to exist.
12
Never-Compliant6969Mar 18, 2026
+5
I know they would. That’s why I’m not running.
5
Plus-Visit-764Mar 18, 2026
+2
Why do that when you could just post fake stuff on social media about said person?
They control the media, and 99% of the country would only have the information on the social media to go by.
2
AurakolMar 18, 2026
+62
Then the next guy comes along and not only undoes it immediately but makes it 10x worse than it ever was
'Murica
62
rollin340Mar 18, 2026
+4
Western powers have eliminated plenty of leaders that did that at the behest of the oil companies. Being from within won't change their MO.
4
masstransienceMar 18, 2026
+2
Whoa, just who do you think you are, Carlos Andrés Pérez?
2
SparkieSupremeMar 18, 2026
+12
They need to be regulated better than utilities are.
12
GetsBetterAfterAFewMar 18, 2026
+10
The only solution - Nationalize fossil fuels. Dont care what you think, if energy is a national security issue, then youre on my side.
10
epistaxis64Mar 18, 2026
+5
Completely agree
5
SowingSaltMar 18, 2026
+2
So we have Aramco instead of Exxon? That doesn't sound good.
2
Emperor_ZarMar 18, 2026
+140
March 17 (Reuters) - BP on Tuesday said it will lock out approximately 800 United Steelworkers members from its 440,000 barrel-per-day Whiting, Indiana, refinery starting at 12:00 a.m. on March 19, citing a breakdown in negotiations over a new labor agreement.
The British oil major ended its 24-hour rolling contract extension and issued a lockout notice after the union rejected proposals that BP considers essential for the facility's long-term sustainability.
Maintenance employees were told not to report after March 17, while other USW‑represented workers will report through March 18. On Friday, BP presented a revised contract offer after union members overwhelmingly rejected what the company had called its "last, best and final" proposal.
"In today's meeting, the Union offered a slightly revised proposal, but once again unequivocally rejected the Company's proposals that are critical to the long-term sustainability of the Refinery," BP said in a statement.
United Steelworkers was not immediately available for comment. The company noted it would continue bargaining in good faith, but lifting the lockout would require the union's acceptance of its March 17 proposal.
BP said the decision to impose a lockout followed months of negotiations during which the union twice rejected key proposals without addressing BP's primary concerns.
Since February 1, the company said it has been operating amid "labor uncertainty," including the possibility of a strike with as little as 24 hours' notice, and regaining operational control was vital to ensure a safe and orderly transfer of refinery management.
The stakes at Whiting are high, as any operational disruptions could exacerbate an already tight global refined-products market, raising supply concerns across the Midwest and potentially beyond. U.S. gasoline and diesel costs have been rising as global fuel markets continue to reel from supply disruptions linked to the Middle East war.
The union had said BP proposed workplace changes, including cutting more than 200 union jobs in operations, maintenance and environmental safety as well as stripping away some workplace protections.
The previous three-year collective bargaining agreement expired on January 31.
The Whiting refinery produces transportation fuels including gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel.
140
lncognitoMosquitoMar 18, 2026
+212
> “*The union had said BP proposed workplace changes, including **cutting more than 200 union jobs in operations, maintenance and environmental safety** as well as stripping away some workplace protections.”
*emphasis mine*
This is the big take away for me. BP considers these changes to their contractual obligations essential to their long term operation, and a good union will never approve to have job cuts like this. That’s more than 25% of those affected by the lockout though it doesn’t specify what percentage of total union jobs would be cut.
This is greed plain and simple. To cut jobs in safety related fields and to do away with workplace protections. Energy, and oil in particular, is already a wildly profitable industry. I see no world in which these cuts to staff and protocols would make this operation unsustainable.
I can only think that it’s for YOY growth for shareholders. And *that* is what’s unsustainable.
212
Regular-Schedule-168Mar 18, 2026
+48
I'm one of the locked out members.
The core proposals were a restructure of "core craft lines," mainly affecting operators. Key supervisory positions would be made salary and, therefore, non-union increasing "management-rights." The restructure would require qualifications maintenance, but the company failed to specific what qualifications while having language that pretty much gave them carte blanch legal control of qualification requirements (when and what), no need to negotiate with the union. The union estimated they would lose members over time to this process.
The proposal included discontinuing "non core craft" support jobs (scaffold builders, pipe insulators, equipment operators, pipe-fitters, building maintenance) and outsourcing to contractors. About 100 people let go immediately on ratification.
Pay cuts throughout "core craft lines" up to -8$/hr (earlier proposals were a lot more) for fully qualified operators. (Our highest paid people make right around +/-55/hr)
Every single nook and cranny in the contract they scaled back overtime and work coverage. (Ex. If an emergency repair job was determined to need 4 people, 4 people would be called, separate from who was on shift, and would get overtime pay) the new proposal allows the company to redirect on site individuals who may or may not be specifically qualified to respond to the job and if they only get two they do the job anyway creating safety issues.
The company wanted a 6-year contract term instead of 4 and a 150-day strike/lockout notice. Refer to Beaumont TX ExxonMobil on why that's not acceptable.
They had language that said we waived all local, state, and federal laws regarding electronic systems for time keeping and payroll, as well as AI.
The proposal document was 150 pages long, but those are the big things that stood out to me.
48
Choice-Try-2873Mar 18, 2026
+18
Thanks for sharing this - corporate was really going for it, weren't they? BP's Risk Management department lawyers must be asleep on the part that deals with emergency repair jobs - but maybe they think if they get the union to sign this Shanghai-sh*t of a contract they'll be covered? But even so, the equipment could be damaged by inexperienced workers and cost more money.
This really makes me mad - turning positions to salaried, and all the rest, everything you've shared. is an insult to you professional workers.
Good luck to you and your coworkers! I'm rooting for you guys!
18
Regular-Schedule-168Mar 18, 2026
+4
The insulting nature of the proposals, I believe, was intentional.
Last weekend, the Local bargaining committee wanted to prove to the company that the membership was united, so they put BPs' "Last Best Final Offer" to a vote. 94% of the membership voted, and 98% voted no.
The company responded the next day with a worse offer.
I believe the company wanted a work stoppage so they could get us out of the plant one way or another. Without an effective NLRB, the company can violate labor laws, and there's nobody to enforce.
Maybe they'll just ghost the union at the negotiating table and pretend we don't exist while they continue operations and hire contractors to replace us.
4
darth_jewbaccaMar 18, 2026
+6
Appreciate the inside knowledge. I work in a USW refinery in a different location and the differences are pretty stark. Our ratified CBA this year was pretty union friendly. Healthy pay increases, loosened attendance policy, expanded use of special pay, no cuts to the workforce.
Does BP Whiting struggle to stay profitable? These proposals only make sense if the site is at risk of shutting down.
6
Regular-Schedule-168Mar 18, 2026
+6
I can't speak to specific profitability at Whiting. They had a rough couple of years for reliability. They were investing a lot of capital in trying to improve reliability after a big upset a couple of years ago February. Then, the Trump administration started the tarrif chaos, and the markets became volatile and uncertain.
I'm happy for you to get some stability from your local. Hang on while you can.
BP brought in new plant management, which were transplants from ExxonMobile a few years ago. Some of the people who came over were specifically involved in the Beaumont TX lockout. So, I think they're intentionally trying to break the union.
They have a much better chance with the federal government gutted.
Billionaires gonna billionaire.
A bunch of my coworkers voted for this.
6
pete_68Mar 18, 2026
+70
>The British oil major ended its 24-hour rolling contract extension and issued a lockout notice after the union rejected proposals that BP considers essential for the facility's long-term sustainability.
People, think about poor BP. They're hemorrhaging money (into their bank accounts). Their stock has only gone up 50% in the past year. That'll barely pay for the CEO's new fleet of yachts. /s
70
SilverAgedSentielMar 18, 2026
+10
"BP successfully delivered first oil from the Atlantis Drill Center 1 expansion in the U.S. Gulf of America — its seventh upstream major project startup of 2025. The project adds approximately 15,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) of gross peak production to the existing Atlantis platform, which has a total gross capacity of up to 200,000 barrels per day."
"Looking ahead, BP is planning an Atlantis Major Facility Expansion for 2027 to further increase production using existing infrastructure, and is targeting further Gulf of America projects as the region sees a surge in energy development aligned with U.S. energy policy.
BP has been seeking to regain investor confidence by slashing renewable spending and prioritizing its traditional oil and gas business, a shift that has broadly been welcomed by investors, with share prices up more than 13% year-to-date as of late 2025
A major leadership change is also underway — following the resignation of CEO Murray Auchincloss in late 2025, the board appointed Meg O'Neill, formerly CEO of Woodside Energy, to take over as CEO effective April 1, 2026.
The Q4 underlying RC profit was $1.5 billion, down from $2.2 billion in Q3, reflecting lower upstream realizations, adverse production mix, lower refinery through puts due to higher turnaround activity, and a temporary outage at the Whiting refinery. The reported loss for Q4 was $3.4 billion, largely driven by $4.3 billion in net adverse adjusting items.
10
FriendlyDespotMar 18, 2026
+18
> On Friday, BP presented a revised contract offer after union members overwhelmingly rejected what the company had called its "last, best and final" proposal.
It's astounding how these corporate negotiators lose the ability to be normal human beings. Every offer from the corporation is "best and final." Everybody knows that the phrase means nothing. Nobody is intimidated by the wording. Why do they still insist on talking like this?
18
all4theloveofthegameMar 18, 2026
+6
"Last, best, and final" is a legal term. This is the point at which the union strikes.
6
jagerbombastic99Mar 18, 2026
+32
8$ gas because BP won't take "f*** you" as a response to cutting every single positions wages and firing 1/4th of the plant
32
strangerduclyMar 18, 2026
+70
So no BP gas or convenience buys. Got it.
70
PoetrySubstantial455Mar 18, 2026
+39
I haven't patronized BP since their oil spill in the gulf, f*** them!
39
PoobblyMar 18, 2026
+20
You might have. This BP gas will go to many stations, not just BP branded stations.
20
DepartmentNaturalMar 18, 2026
+5
You might not have shopped at their store but you buy their fuel
5
Drak_is_RightMar 18, 2026
+2
Likely sells to all gas stations.
Will spike prices across the Midwest.
I wonder how many states it serves.
If it hurts Wisconsin and Michigan prices much...
2
TheSpatulaOfLoveMar 18, 2026
+11
I had a short term project at BP Whiting years ago. I’ll never forget how it felt like I wasn’t even on earth anymore.
11
VonnegutsPallMallsMar 18, 2026
+18
These assholes are responsible for us being at war with Iran and now this.
18
Defiant-Peace-493Mar 17, 2026
+23
Would they be able to file labor complaints in the UK? It does look like there's a BP of America, but that's a subsidiary of the main one.
23
lilithweatherwaxMar 18, 2026
+14
No, UK protections apply to UK workers. This was a refinery in Indiana
14
NeoLephtyMar 18, 2026
+13
>It noted it would continue bargaining in good faith, but lifting the lockout would require the union's acceptance of its latest proposal.
"We'll continue negotiating but only if they accept all of our terms" is a hell of a position.
13
Sweetwill62Mar 18, 2026
+11
Time to lock out the CEO and shareholders from their money.
11
Real_Ad6375Mar 18, 2026
+17
F*** you scabby Bp cunts
17
dsv853Mar 18, 2026
+11
locking out 800 workers at a refinery during an already volatile energy market. galaxy brain move right there
11
MCB1317Mar 18, 2026
+4
BP should have been given the corporate "death penalty" after the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
It's an indictment of our entire system of corporate regulatory bodies that they were allowed to survive.
4
Warmstar219Mar 18, 2026
+9
Big talk for a company whose primary assets are famously extremely combustible.
9
TheHappyPieMar 18, 2026
+21
I haven't bought BP gas since the Gulf spill and I was just thinking "oh that's silly, it's been a long time."
And then here we are...
21
Secret_Account07Mar 18, 2026
+7
wtf? Since when was Reuters pay walled? I can’t read it
7
PorkyrogueMar 18, 2026
+2
Hey we all trying to make a dollar
2
CaffeinatedBarbarianMar 18, 2026
+9
This is why legislation is necessary to protect worker rights. The free market will do whatever it can to reduce labor costs. Workers will only be protected when we protect them.
9
furrysalesman69Mar 18, 2026
+6
Invest in renewables, and EV.
6
Old_Yesterday322Mar 18, 2026
+5
you would think now would not be the time for that. but alas, and we're not surprised and it's fucked up.
5
BadDongOneMar 18, 2026
+8
Oh boy I can't wait for the US CSB video about the Whiting Indiana refinery incident!
8
Everythings_FuckedMar 18, 2026
+2
It'll be one for the history books.
2
OakroscoeMar 18, 2026
+4
Fortunately congress passed a bill in January to fund the CSB. I’m sure that you’ll be surprised that the current administration wanted to defund and disband the CSB. Their videos are excellent and I always made new trainees watch a couple of them to see how quickly things can go wrong
4
BadDongOneMar 18, 2026
+2
I'm not even in any fields they cover but I still enjoy the failure analysis aspect of it, it's very fascinating to understand why things fail and very telling that it's almost always a cost issue. Be it lack of training, deferred maintenance, or poor materials selection.
2
OakroscoeMar 19, 2026
+2
I can assure you, if you work in the field it’s even more interesting. Deferred maintenance, how many times has that bit us in the ass? I’d always show new guys the duct tape one: https://youtu.be/tltN0wTZ0ck?si=gU7osoTC9NSJs9Ve as well as this one about end Richmond Chevron fire: https://youtu.be/juIkiuXN9Es
2
BadDongOneMar 19, 2026
+2
I'm semi-adjacent to some of the risks discussed in the videos, but I'm only in automotive repair. We do hot work near fuel and oil, we have overhead hazards, hydraulics, electricity, pressure vessels, etc. Years ago I was astounded to learn that garbage worker and automotive tech were about on par for deaths on the job and both were higher than police.
2
OakroscoeMar 19, 2026
+2
That actually doesn’t surprise me. Having worked elsewhere than a refinery now, it’s crazy how little some hazards are respected, and those are hazards that can kill you.
2
TheGreatGamer1389Mar 18, 2026
+3
Right now is a very bad time to do that.
3
DickDongMcLongMar 18, 2026
+5
Being a scab can be hazardous to one's health...
5
Pleasant-Ad887Mar 18, 2026
+9
It is funny how America has ALL THESE rules and laws to "protect" workers but companies don't give a shit because they only get punished with pennies for fines.
9
JustatickleroneMar 18, 2026
+6
Boycott ARCO gas immediately nationwide. Loss of revenue plus unsatisfied gas station franchise overhead equals back to the table.
Edit: Looks like the Republicans are already downvoting this lol. losers.
6
vnzjunkMar 18, 2026
+2
I already did this several years ago after their actions caused the oil platform to blow up and ended up pouting the waters and beaches of the gulf and they got off with a slap on the wrist.
2
sayerofstuffsMar 18, 2026
+6
I’m sure BP is partnering with the orange clown on this
6
[deleted]Mar 18, 2026
+5
The United States needs a reckoning and purging of all these rich fucks and corporations, when is it going to be enough for everyone to band together and take this country back?
5
PossiblyATurdMar 18, 2026
+4
Something something seize the means something something
4
WordsWithSamMar 18, 2026
+7
Hmm now why would a corporation stop a union if they don’t work and aren’t good for the workforce?
7
userhwonMar 18, 2026
+2
Oh no! I guess they'll just have to raise prices...
2
Skibidibum69Mar 18, 2026
+2
Imagine thinking not going to a BP means you’re not supporting BP 😂
2
Mort8989Mar 18, 2026
+2
Article without the paywall
http://archive.today/JIqTo
2
cef911f1Mar 18, 2026
+2
I hope the first government officials that funded a sports stadium are rotting in hell. Taxpayers should not be expected to pay for stadiums.
2
Consistent-Leek4986Mar 18, 2026
+3
can’t share the increased profits, except to billionaires
3
Everythings_FuckedMar 18, 2026
+3
One reason I love driving an EV is because it is a constant, physical F*** You to the oil barons. Everyone should do it.
3
bobotoonsMar 18, 2026
+2
It amazes me, reading the comments, that hardly anyone has read the article. It's a labor dispute and contract negotiations have failed.
2
bubba4114Mar 18, 2026
+2
So they pause work for a little bit, make gas prices spike, and then start pumping it out at the higher price to profit even more?
2
MudJumpy1063Mar 18, 2026
+3
I like the way Snrub thinks.
3
OverseerIsLifeMar 18, 2026
+2
Another company to boycott.
2
jeepfailMar 18, 2026
+6
BP gives a fresh reason every decade or so. I’ll give it to them, others just sell or rebrand while they say f*** it.
6
wilhelmbetsoldMar 18, 2026
+1
The whiting plant is a bit of a shitshow to begin with. Deeply unsurprised
1
CharcoalGreyWolfMar 18, 2026
+1
I’ve stayed away from BP stations since Deepwater Horizon. It’s a feeble protest, but it’s about all I can do.
1
MD90__Mar 18, 2026
+1
im guessing all unions will be dealing with this mess down the road if companies want to cut costs
1
Souldestroyer_RebornMar 18, 2026
+1
As a Brit that’s worked for BP previously, I only managed to last 24months before I left, they’re f****** useless and I’ve no idea how they’re still in business.
They are a shocking company, with piss poor management.
1
Drak_is_RightMar 18, 2026
+1
This refinery has a consumption greater than 80% of the world's countries, edging towards 85%
Spreads across like 10sq kilometers of land.
1
AddanDeithMar 19, 2026
+1
Lol. Just so people are aware BP is the direct evolution of the Anglo- Persian Oil company, that had its assets nationalized by Mohammed Mosaddegh, the democratically elected leader of Iran in 1951. Mosaddegh tried to get a deal that would repatriate the British company for its losses over a 15 year period. Instead, the British sanctioned Iran's Oil and together the US, sponsored a coup to overthrow Mosaddegh.
So, f*** BP in 1951. F*** BP today and forever.
1
samIam70000Mar 19, 2026
+1
This is what happens when talks break down and it turns into pressure tactics. Not really a good outcome for anyone. If they’d just stayed at the table and worked it out, it probably wouldn’t have escalated like this.
178 Comments