I know shows have always integrated product marketing into scenes - usually done through items lying around or being used by the main character. However, in the last week, 3 shows name-dropped brands in such a clunky way that it gave me the ick.
The Pitt with Lyft, High Potential with Copilot, and Elsbeth with Google Lens (does Google Lens even need an ad???)
Let’s be real: the best brand integration in a long while was the Community episode with the student named “Subway”
834
DanHero91Apr 12, 2026
+335
The episode when he came back working for Honda is probably the best of the later seasons.
335
NogluesApr 12, 2026
+120
Frankie attacking the Dean after finding him in a room full of Honda merch is my most rewatched clip from the whole show.
120
midgetcastleApr 13, 2026
+12
She has a rule about being constructive
12
Xenocide112Apr 13, 2026
+12
She has several questions but can't ask them because they're rhetorical and all end with the word 'idiot'
12
ShitchesAintBitApr 13, 2026
+9
Do you know what rhetorical...?
Of course you don't, you are an idiot. I'm sorry! I'm so sorry! You are so stupid and you have no idea, you are the only one who has no idea, because guess why?
Don't answer that, you'll get it wrong.
9
VaudevilleDadaApr 13, 2026
+2
That is a masterfully delivered monologue.
2
diego_simeoneApr 12, 2026
+73
F****** Billy Zane killed it in that episode.
73
BetellApr 12, 2026
+49
Level 7 susceptible
49
DanHero91Apr 12, 2026
+35
That's moon man talk.
35
GECollinsApr 13, 2026
+5
I'm only level 7 susceptible when it's the super bowl and those damn clydesdales come on the screen, makes me want a Budweiser so bad. only day of year
5
Fantastic-Bedroom81Apr 12, 2026
+107
That Subway episode was genius because they made the absurdity part of the joke instead of pretending it was natural
These new ones feel like someone just ctrl+f replaced "taxi" with "Lyft" in the script. When characters start talking about features of Google Lens unprompted it's just painful to watch
107
allthenamesaretaken4Apr 13, 2026
+36
Not to defend product placement by any means, but I feel like when someone says they're gonna call a car now, they say whatever brand they have on their phone unless they're one of those folks who checks both to see which has a lower rate. So whether it is Uber or Lyft or Gary, any of those is almost more believable than calling a taxi anywhere I've been in the last 15 years.
36
Electronic_Style_980Apr 13, 2026
+9
The weird bit was that the convo goes something like this:
Nurse: Let me call you an Uber or taxi
Old Lady: No, I don't have money to pay
Whitaker: I'll book a Lyft for you
Old Lady: Okay
9
Familiar-Banana-8116Apr 13, 2026
+19
I have to defend this entire thing.
The Nurse was making it clear the patient had to pay which generated the response of not having the money.
Whitaker made it clear HE was paying which got the yes. His offer was in reaction to, 'I am broke.'.
The only reason it felt jarring is that we have turned the company name 'Uber' into a generalized name for ride share. Lyft never got adopted in that way.
19
yourerightaboutthatApr 13, 2026
+3
And then Lyft charged him $250 bucks for the lady being racist and puking in the back seat. This after the driver picked up a rando that obviously wasn’t a 26-year-old man named Dennis. In the grand scheme of product placements, I feel like it’s not the most glowing endorsement of the product.
3
Familiar-Banana-8116Apr 13, 2026
+3
There is the remote possibility it was never product placement...
Consider: Lyft and Uber doing these surcharges after the ride is a well known thing. I think there is even conjecture drivers can do it fraudulently.
What if - and this is only conjecture, I am not suggesting I know anything - what if the writer had a grudge against Lyft and used this as a fun storyline?
3
yourerightaboutthatApr 13, 2026
+2
I was thinking similar. If I were Lyft, this definitely isn’t a storyline I’d pay for.
2
ChainsawSnugglingApr 12, 2026
+36
[30 Rock has the best product placement of any show.](https://youtu.be/d36wUmJGzvA?si=VqJ2H8fohgjxLnvo)
36
theduncanApr 12, 2026
+12
lol, I was thinking it was going to be Dot Com and Grizz, with swag.
12
ChainsawSnugglingApr 12, 2026
+9
There are many instances of hilariously bad ad placement in the show, I just think this one is the best. I also really like when Jack gets bedbugs and he's talking about how the Sysco teleworking equipment makes him feel as if he's in the room.
9
TheJuliettestApr 12, 2026
+26
My favorite brand integration was Reno 911!, where they spend the entire episode trying to figure out how a bag of “delicious, piping hot Arby’s” at the crime scene figures into their homicide.
https://youtu.be/86jtZVlC40w?si=T7FoMLJn1c6qHNx-
26
dat_1_dudeApr 12, 2026
+17
Eat fresh!
17
aelysiumApr 12, 2026
+34
Subway in Chuck was the best. Big Mike Salivating over it in character was hilarious
34
LaxSagacityApr 13, 2026
+8
One of the Subway episodes of Chuck was originally aired in 3D. I couldn't get the 3D glasses and normal red / blue ones wouldn't quite work and so it looked like ass. I have forever missed out on seeing Sarah in 3D.
8
katikaboomApr 12, 2026
+12
I've always been a fan of the Pottery Barn episode of Friends
12
Weird_Squirrel_8382Apr 13, 2026
+3
I still scream Pottery Barn in Phoebe's anguished voice
3
CakieaApr 12, 2026
+26
Toyota/Prius, Hyundai, Microsoft have been doing this stuff for at least 20 years. Burn Notice, Bones, Gilmore Girls, so many others... hell even west wing had a prius episode.
26
psimworkApr 12, 2026
+25
Seriously. The first time I noticed it was on an episode of Smallville when Lois Lane moves to town, and she's talking to Martha Kent and basically the dialogue is Martha saying, basically, "Lois I'm so proud of you for buying a new car on your own. And it's such a nice car."
Later on in the episode, it gets so much worse. Lois drives her new Ford Fusion^tm to a military base and she has to distract the guards. How does she distract the guards? Why by showing them the features of her new Ford Fusion, of course! The guard was like, "this is a really nice car!!" and Lois takes the time to show him the glove box that is ON TOP of the dash instead of on the bottom! What a unique feature!
It was just as bad, watching an episode of Modern Family, a couple years later, and it was basically a big Apple products commercial from start to finish. That it's one of the highest rated episodes in the entire series kinda makes me want to vomit.
Then there's also Summer Glau "sexily" devouring a sandwich from Subway on Chuck, or every electronic device in every Spiderman movie being specifically a Sony item...
Tl;Dr - brand integration in media has been this shameless for decades.
25
bristow84Apr 12, 2026
+12
The Sony stuff I’m SLIGHTLY willing to overlook considering Sony produced TASM movies. Only slightly thoughz
12
HuntedWolfApr 12, 2026
+11
The worst part of TASM was when he starts getting the weird spider symptoms and goes to Bing to find out what’s wrong. It made me laugh out loud. Nobody has ever used Bing intentionally.
11
psimworkApr 12, 2026
+5
I have to admit that I've used Bing intentionally. A lot. Back when I was in college (circa 2014), I used Bing translate to help me in Spanish class because (at the time) Bing translate was FAR better than Google translate.
Afterwards, I used Bing pretty regularly because I had a windows phone (which is a STRONGLY underrated mobile OS. Windows may be pretty garbage right now, but windows phone 8.1 was Awesome).
Finally, I used it on the desktop pretty regularly because I got points for every search that I could redeem for gift cards and whatnot. Nothing huge, but enough that I could buy an Xbox game every six months or so.
5
KaJaHaApr 12, 2026
+4
I dunno, I thought the worst part of TASM was Peter just stealing the web fluid instead of inventing it. Or how he unceremoniously dropped the hunt for Uncle Ben's killer halfway through the movie without any resolution. Or really anything else about those crappy movies.
4
faretheewellennuiApr 13, 2026
+2
I must admit I use Bing at work as it’s the default search engine on Edge and I’m too lazy to change the settings on my work computer
2
psimworkApr 12, 2026
+5
Yeah it's a small issue, admittedly. It's like every Apple TV show having ONLY apple products. I was just pointing out that brand integration was nothing new.
5
Morticia_BlackApr 12, 2026
+6
Remember that greenish car in The Walking Dead they had for the first two seasons? Never got damaged and somehow always looked tastefully dusty instead of run down
6
BgtobgfuApr 12, 2026
+4
I remember some pretty bad Microsoft product placement in Elementary too
4
bristow84Apr 12, 2026
+3
The amount of blatant in your face Surface placement in shows god.
3
scotchirishApr 12, 2026
+10
"Let me just Bing™ it" was probably the most jarring one for me.
10
theduncanApr 12, 2026
+3
When the surface was new, and they had the ads in the show. Where it seemed they needed to show them attaching the keyboard, it that stupid way from the ad, it made we stop watching some shows.
3
No_Use_9652Apr 12, 2026
+6
A more obscure show but on the Microsoft theme, Elementary was comically bad with the surface tablets. So many key pieces of evidence had to be shown off on that bad boy lol
6
WoodyMellowApr 13, 2026
+2
The best thing about that episode was it's title.
2
adietcokeadayApr 13, 2026
+1
It’s a bit more niche, but Teen Wolf had some great product placement in a completely different way. They had a few moments where a character would be talking about something completely relevant to the plot and say something along the lines of “they’re unexpectedly good together” and then pull out a Reese’s. For shows that are going to do product placement kind of seriously (so not like Community or Chuck incorporating Subway into the lore of the show and addressing it directly), it’s probably the best done product placement I’ve seen in a long time
1
EmeraldJunkieApr 12, 2026
+211
In regards to The Pitt it's an awkward one because it's just how people communicate in the modern day. We don't say "I'm going to get a taxi," we absolutely say "I'm going to order an Uber," or something to that effect. Like, in the earlier episode where they're trying to get the diabetes meds to the patient, they say they'll do it via Uber. It doesn't really stand out as product placement because that's absolutely something someone would say. They wouldn't say "I'll just get a ride share service to drop it off."
It's just how commercialized things are these days.
211
misterbowenApr 12, 2026
+107
Really feels like "Uber" is starting to "Kleenex." I "Uber'd" just the other day, but I only have the Lyft app on my phone...
107
SpontanemooseApr 12, 2026
+30
Genrecide lol. Uber would probably love if we said "rideshare". That said, I'll say Doordash even if it's Uber Eats so I guess you win some.
30
UnderPressureVSApr 13, 2026
+3
Yesterday I was too sick to drive so I used Instacart to doordash some Walgreens-brand kleenex and band-aids, then I had to use Bing to google how to get the xerox function on my HP printer to work.
3
bros402Apr 13, 2026
+19
AirBnb, too. Nobody says Vrbo or Agoda or FurnishedFinder
19
VestalminApr 13, 2026
+7
Personally, I’ve never even heard of this ones. I feel like we all know Lyft but still say uber
7
JoyceecosApr 13, 2026
+3
Have only used Lyft this past year and still call it uber
3
ma2016Apr 13, 2026
+5
I still pronounce the letters for VRBO the way it was before the rebranding
5
StuffThingsMoreStuffApr 13, 2026
+3
I say vebo all the time, but i say it like verbo.
3
Pool_SharkApr 13, 2026
+7
I never got why Kleenex is the example used. I’ve never heard someone say pass me a Kleenex, at least up in the north east we say tissue.
Band-aid on the other hand…
7
Bionic_FerirApr 13, 2026
+16
GOOGLE IS RIGHT THERE. let me google that, so I google something, etc. probably the most prolific modern example.
16
_trouble_every_day_Apr 13, 2026
+5
That’s because google is the only search engine anyone uses so it’s not a very good example. No one says I’ll google it then pulls up bing.
5
goovreyApr 13, 2026
+18
There are dozens of us duckduckgo users
18
harrisarahApr 13, 2026
+2
I've even say hundreds
2
Jake_77Apr 13, 2026
+4
Xerox (old example now)
4
obi1kenobi1Apr 13, 2026
+3
Friendly reminder to always say “I googled it”, lowercase, never capitalize it. Google hates that, because it weakens their trademark enforcement. There’s basically zero chance anything will be done about it, from what I’ve heard the last time a corporation lost its trademark due to it becoming a generic word was the 1950s, but the least we can do is try, fight your autocorrect’s attempts to capitalize the word and maybe some day the dominos will fall.
There was a similar running joke on the podcast Comedy Bang Bang, Scott Aukerman would use “bing” as his verb for web searches, but made it clear he didn’t use Bing the product, leading to nonsensical sentences like “I binged it on Google”.
3
ian9outof10Apr 13, 2026
+3
I used to be a journalist, we got emails about using brands preferred capitalisation in our writing, which we obviously ignored.
3
[deleted]Apr 12, 2026
+21
[deleted]
21
DeaddyRuxpinApr 13, 2026
+8
I use Duck Duck Go to do my googling. :-)
8
Pool_SharkApr 13, 2026
+17
These days? It’s been a thing ever since products had names.
Band-aid, Q-tips, Zamboni, Crock Pot, Jell-O, chapstick, etc. All brand names used similarly for much longer than “these days”
17
StacheBandicootApr 13, 2026
+2
There’s other brands of jello?
2
BigRedNutcaseApr 13, 2026
+3
Store brand generics have always competed with the real deals.
3
badhouseplantbadApr 13, 2026
+3
Yes, Jell-O is a name brand for gelatine dessert
3
ZalvrenApr 13, 2026
+9
So it's not an awkward one lol. I definitively didn't even clock it as product placement where it of course is (otherwise why not Uber or something else?)
Although, he gets a surcharge and complaint so if anything, it does seem less appealing to use it.
9
nervelliApr 13, 2026
+4
The other doctor does mention an Uber as well. She suggests an Uber or a taxi and the patient says she can't pay for it. And they didn't make any note of Lyft being cheaper, it just seemed like that was what Whitaker uses. But him then explaining how ride shares work seemed a bit much.
4
ZalvrenApr 13, 2026
+6
Yeah and apparently, it wasn't a product placement so just natural speaking/actions.
> But him then explaining how ride shares work seemed a bit much.
Not really for an old woman who might not know what it is (she could say she can't pay when speaking of the taxi)
6
MILFHunterHearstHelmApr 12, 2026
+141
Have you seen Chuck?
Edit* subway literally saved the tv show but the deal was to heavily feature the brand https://web.archive.org/web/20220525092526/https://www.qualitylogoproducts.com/blog/subway-sandwiches-hero-of-almost-cancelled-shows/
141
JkayakjApr 12, 2026
+43
That show had so much product placement
43
StuffonBookshelfsApr 12, 2026
+31
Literally how they let it stay on the air.
31
cheesecake-gnomeApr 12, 2026
+31
And as a fan, I was so thankful to Subway that they saved the show, I got a footlong every Monday at 7:30 and ate it when Chuck aired at 8.
You can see posts from a lot of people that did that by sorting /r/chuck by Top of All Time
31
StuffonBookshelfsApr 12, 2026
+8
Chuck is one of my all time favorite shows.
8
harrisarahApr 13, 2026
+2
Chuck was great and I've watched it several times but now that Zach Levi turned into a raging MAGA asshat I dunno if I can do it again
2
CosmonateApr 13, 2026
+2
Salute to the man who saved Chuck
2
Elan-Morin-TedronaiApr 12, 2026
+15
But they did it so well, they made a joke about it that was pretty funny but didn't reflect poorly on Subway. It wouldn't be so bad if others were as good as they were at it.
15
mister-fergusonApr 13, 2026
+1
I had a discussion just today that featured Subway.
"Oh you're from *hometown*? I'm from *hometown*! I always see *hometown* as the Subway sandwich of cities. It's a city in the same way Subway is food."
1
lupin43Apr 12, 2026
+97
The high potential copilot thing had me rolling my eyes so hard. The money they’ll spend to get something to proliferate that nobody wants
97
TheJuliettestApr 12, 2026
+27
Genuinely surprised that one was a product placement given her spreadsheet looked like a shitty excel macro.
27
thesecretbarnApr 12, 2026
+17
The only people who might use copilot would be fooled by that
17
jangle_bo_jinglesApr 12, 2026
+6
Oh god yes - watched that the other day - couldn't believe it
6
imbeingkidnappedApr 13, 2026
+2
I didn’t think it could get worse than their Amazon Prime product placement and then they did this.
2
dgard5thApr 12, 2026
+183
Lyft actually said they were not officially part of The Pitt. They joked on Threads they would have never fined precious Dr Whitaker. 😂. (Lyft has since taken full advantage……)
183
ZPTsApr 12, 2026
+153
People do say "I'll call you an Uber/Lyft" in real life. I think it's more jarring when they say "rideshare" or make up a brand name. Plus the Pitt's situation wasn't exactly a glowing use of their product (the lady racked up charges for him and was racist to the driver).
153
YukonCigsApr 12, 2026
+68
It would be like hearing someone say “Let me use a search engine for that” instead of saying Google. No one says “let me call a ride share”, that’s just not how people talk
68
Jake_77Apr 13, 2026
+3
I guess it’s regional because my friends and I will say, let’s take a rideshare, or I’m going to order a rideshare
3
ZalvrenApr 13, 2026
+3
They could just say a taxi or a car really, close enough.
3
TheSecondEikonOfFireApr 12, 2026
+12
Yeah of all examples to pick, that one didn’t even cross my radar
12
busigirl21Apr 13, 2026
+11
I feel like "it's totally possible that one act of kindness could cost you hundreds of dollars and the precious rating you rely on to get picked up" isn't exactly the brand integration the company would have looked for intentionally
11
clain4671Apr 12, 2026
+13
Im pretty sure that what happened here is a version of how apple won't let villains use an iPhone.
13
Toby_O_NotobyApr 13, 2026
+7
That one was either overreported or just badly reported. If you Google “Apple won't let bad guys use iPhone," literally every article cites Rian Johnson and Knives Out. So you get dozens of reports about it, but only one source.
Meanwhile, there are plenty of villains using Apple products both on Apple TV+ and shows like Only Murders in the Building, with >!Marshall using a MacBook to write his screenplays!<
What Apple doesn't want is someone using their products in a nefarious light. So you can have a bad guy call his mom on an iPhone, but not using an app on it to detonate a bomb in a grade school.
7
ZalvrenApr 13, 2026
+2
Every appearance of Apple product isn't necessarily an Apple product placement though, it's just the most common phone for the US. And if it's not, they don't have any control on who is using it and how.
2
caspararemiApr 13, 2026
+2
I do totally agree, it's like when Apple TV was launching there were all these reports that characters wouldn't be allowed to swear in their shows?! Just clickbait nonsense.
BUT there is a funny thing in the current season of The Last Thing He Told Me, where everyone iMessages with blue messages, except when they message the mob family, then their messages are green.
2
ExtraGlovesApr 12, 2026
+2
I thought it was an uber ad to get to people to not take Lyft.
2
bristow84Apr 12, 2026
+57
Clearly you have never watched Fringe or Designated Survivor with scenes that are more or less Ford commercials.
Or Chuck and Community with Subway. Although on Chuck’s part I will fully admit I went out and got a Subway sub just to eat while watching the series finale.
Being blatant with product placement in this manner has been a thing for ages.
57
septober32ndApr 12, 2026
+15
Even [Breaking Bad](https://youtu.be/_V0LZdFPVTs?si=BG4gw-ordNt91L4Z) did it.
15
browncharliebrownApr 13, 2026
+2
this isn't a link to when they play sonic 06
2
IMayBeIronManApr 12, 2026
+8
I'm rewatching Fringe and the mini Ford commercials get more blatant as the show goes on as well.
8
Spiritual_Weight_416Apr 12, 2026
+7
I think that Ford must have had a huge push for product placement in the early '00s. I remember watching an episode a Smallville where Lois is trying to drive onto a military base and the guard is very impressed with her new Ford Focus.
7
bristow84Apr 13, 2026
+3
I just started Season 3 on my rewatch and man I forgot how much Ford/Lincoln marketing there really is. Like it didn’t really take me out to see FBI driving Navigators but the amount of main/notable characters driving Fusions or Tauruses or the Flex is ridiculous.
I also completely forgot about some scenes that were absurd, like Peter using the hands free navigation to find a route to Portland only to go “that was absurdly easy”. Like nobody talks like that.
3
Orcus424Apr 12, 2026
+9
Bones did the same thing with Ford product placement. It was cringe.
9
pm_me_vegsApr 12, 2026
+4
Never forget the burn notice car ad.
4
PkockApr 13, 2026
+2
The whole Blue Sky era of USA Network basically doubled as car ads.
2
StuffonBookshelfsApr 12, 2026
+3
Do you remember when they had the 3D glasses for the terrible 3D episode??
3
bristow84Apr 12, 2026
+2
No but that sounds like a Fringe episode so I’ll hit it eventually during my rewatch.
2
StuffonBookshelfsApr 12, 2026
+3
It’s Chuck vs The Third Dimension. I think season two.
3
DynamiteWitLaserBeamApr 13, 2026
+2
Yeah really, there were lots of shows in the 00's that would just go on and on about how great their car's satnav system was. This is nothing new and honestly I feel like it's become less intrusive than it used to be.
2
grilledcheese2332Apr 12, 2026
+27
Riverdale was so funny with old navy... 'look at these baby jeans"
27
pbnchickApr 12, 2026
+7
Nancy Drew did the same. It was so obvious they might as well have broken the 4th wall to advertise the jeans.
7
[deleted]Apr 12, 2026
+27
[deleted]
27
BgtobgfuApr 12, 2026
+11
Vertically integrated?
11
framedraggedApr 13, 2026
+2
My tummy hurts
2
PosingAsCinephileApr 12, 2026
+64
No one says ordering a taxi anymore
64
moderatenerdApr 12, 2026
+15
yeah i didnt find that out of place whatsoever. most young people order uber/lyft even when it makes no sense to do so. at least the scene made sense!
15
sleepyotter92Apr 12, 2026
+9
yeah i think people are more likely to say "calling an uber"
9
ShadowVulcanApr 13, 2026
+2
Except in Japan (or fine dining places, lol)
2
codemen95Apr 12, 2026
+15
In the pitt, it would've been far more clunkier if Whitaker said "let me get you a ride share" rather than naming either uber or lyft
15
bros402Apr 13, 2026
+2
tbh I could see "Let me order you a car"
2
codemen95Apr 13, 2026
+8
Even that too sounds weird, especially when he gets the email and having him say "the car is fining me $250" instead of saying what the ride share service is
8
1cecream4breakfastApr 13, 2026
+6
If someone says they’re “ordering me a car” I’m thinking a Lincoln Towncar or something. “Call you an uber or Lyft” makes most sense in every convo if we are talking about one of those platforms.
6
Isaacjd93Apr 12, 2026
+25
The Boys with Taco Bell this week too
25
diego_simeoneApr 12, 2026
+10
I think the writers were subtly taking the piss out of Taco Bell. Previously Sage gave herself a lobotomy to relax, now she’s eating Taco Bell.
10
jordanFromJerseyApr 12, 2026
+2
Wasn’t she eating Taco Bell, or something similar, back during the lobotomy as well?
2
thatditzyguyApr 12, 2026
+8
Yeah but she wasn't listing off menu items then lol
8
liamemsaApr 12, 2026
+35
Do you really think Lyft did a paid product placement when they ended up taking his entire first paycheck when the lady vomited and cursed at the driver?
35
ecattApr 13, 2026
+5
Seriously, that doesn't strike me as product placement given how the situation ended!
5
bristow84Apr 13, 2026
+2
The fact that it would cost Whitaker his entire first paycheck when it was like a $250 fine is what took me out the most. Like I know Residents aren’t paid that much but really, $250 is the majority of your paycheck? Even after starting to pay back loans that should leave him more then that considering his living situation,
2
pabo81Apr 12, 2026
+9
Yeah it really took us out of the scene to see the characters in Game of Thrones constantly plugging Liberty Mutual insurance.
9
GECollinsApr 13, 2026
+3
Leaving their Starbucks cups all over the place
3
VaguelyArtisticApr 12, 2026
+15
Just today I learned that the BBC doesn’t allow products placements of any kind. Other UK channels are more lax but they still have pretty strict guidelines.
I also learned that sometimes a show will leave an area, say a kitchen cabinet, empty and then CGI the product after an agreement has been made.
15
theboyrossyApr 12, 2026
+10
In the UK a TV show has to show a P symbol at the beginning, end of the show and advert breaks so viewers know it contains product placement.
10
eddmarioApr 13, 2026
+2
>I also learned that sometimes a show will leave an area, say a kitchen cabinet, empty and then CGI the product after an agreement has been made.
Apparently an episode of *F-R-I-E-N-D-S* did that with a pack of Oreos
2
ian9outof10Apr 13, 2026
+2
Product Placement in UK TV wasn’t allowed for many years, it’s only recently been permitted with the PP symbol at the start of a show on ITV/Channel4 etc
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/consumers/2011/02/product-placement-final.pdf?v=324161
2
TIGHazardApr 13, 2026
+2
Absolutely true. Though they can still show real brands - co-productions must have product placement edited out but programme acquisitions are fine.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/independence-from-commercial-and-other-external-interests/guidelines
> The use of, or reference to, branded products, organisations or services in drama, comedy, entertainment and lifestyle content must be editorially justified and a wide range should be used over time to avoid undue prominence.
> Any spoken reference accompanying a visual reference must be editorially justified.
> When real products are used as set dressing, lingering shots should be avoided, and content makers should try to avoid their visibility in other shots. Consideration should be given to whether there is any conflict of interest in relation to a product and any external commercial relationships of talent used in the content.
---
> The BBC must not commission, produce or co-produce output for its UK Public Services which contains product placement. All programmes made by the BBC or an independent producer for broadcast on UK Public Services must be free of product placement.
---
> When a UK Public Service acquires content containing product placement that it has not commissioned or produced and that has not been commissioned or produced by a connected person, such as a BBC Commercial Service, there is no product placement signalling requirement.
> There must be no conditions attached to the acquisition that the product placement will be broadcast.
> Any visual or aural mentions of products that have been placed in an acquisition that is not from a connected person should be editorially justified and must not be promotional or unduly prominent.
> A record should normally be kept of the existence of any product placement where known, and of any measures taken in relation to it.
2
jdbinnjApr 12, 2026
+6
Abbott Elementary did the same last week. Used a product on the show and 30 seconds later a commercial for it.
6
ogmarkerApr 13, 2026
+7
The Amazon ones are sooo obvious and off putting. They’ve done ‘em at least three times now. Sumn sumn “I’m so grateful we were able to prime these supplies with overnight delivery!”
At least the one last week woth the Kleenex kind of tied into the joke with the teacher crying. Then I was like, “….a on-the-go kleenex dispenser??”
7
NavitachApr 12, 2026
+4
Cheers did the same thing in the 80s: Carla talked about eating a certain kind of Life Saver in the dark making a spark, and then there was a commercial for that very thing, and they said it too (or maybe the commercial was during the episode before the conversation; I can't remember). But that was probably intentional for fun.
4
maverickcanuckApr 12, 2026
+6
I just watched the movie Is This On? And Will Arnetts characters buys a new Volkswagen ID Buzz. It did nothing to move the plot and was such an annoying product placement.
6
Emotional_Signal7883Apr 12, 2026
+6
I only date guys who drink Snapple.
6
AppollixApr 12, 2026
+16
[It’s like people only do things to get paid, and that’s really sad.](https://youtu.be/s9FUgzAJun4?si=H6OUfmSUZqI30aUt)
16
zeusoidApr 12, 2026
+5
Bones and GMC or was it Toyota
5
minnick27Apr 12, 2026
+3
Definitely Toyota in later seasons, but I think GMC was there earlier
3
BgtobgfuApr 12, 2026
+5
Ugh that High Potential Copilot bit was so awful.
5
obi1kenobi1Apr 13, 2026
+5
You’re not wrong, but honestly this is a return to form rather than some new thing.
Go watch any random episode of The Burns and Allen Show from the 1950s. In addition to being surprisingly creative and postmodern in some ways, like George Burns pausing a conversation and literally stepping outside the set to deliver an aside to the audience à la Malcolm in the Middle, the other shocking thing is that half way through every episode Gracie Allen just starts baking a cake with Carnation Evaporated Milk. This isn’t an ad break, there’s no cuts or anything, she’s just having a conversation with her friends and suddenly “hey check it out isn’t Carnation Evaporated Milk great? Let’s make a recipe with it”.
I might be misremembering, the show is long before my time, but I think that was literally the only advertising the show got, no commercial breaks but a five minute Carnation Evaporated Milk sales pitch worked into the middle of every episode. This sort of thing wasn’t unusual, it was the early days of TV and brand integration was just how advertising was done. Some shows were literally called “the [brand name] show”, even if that had nothing to do with the content, and other times the brand owned the time s*** and would decide what shows they wanted to put in it.
Even a decade later when normal modern commercial breaks were universal there were still a lot of brand integrations and sponsor control of a show, like every episode of the first couple seasons of The D*** Van Dyke Show had a segment with Laura Petrie doing dishes to show off the dish soap. These were more like normal commercials, a pre-shot segment that was the same in every episode (although I think there were a few variations as time went on) but for some reason the DVD box sets include them at the end of the episodes as if they’re an important part of the show.
But for a few decades that sort of thing went away and we just had normal commercial breaks and maybe the occasional paid-for product placement. It’s not that jarring and clumsy brand integrations are a new thing, it’s just that they’re back after a prolonged absence. And maybe they weren’t even that gone, just not as common on popular shows. Because [Angie Tribeca made fun of it a decade ago](https://youtu.be/e9MNEIJsoGA), [Comedy Bang Bang made fun of it in 2012](https://youtu.be/OjSYreFuXCg), and of course the most infamous example was from [Wayne’s World in 1992](https://youtu.be/8lgLYGBbDNs). So even when it was “gone” I think it was more just under the radar and not as in-your-face.
5
Electronic_Style_980Apr 13, 2026
+2
You're absolutely right. I think I was taken aback because we haven't seen random name drops like these in some time.
2
obi1kenobi1Apr 13, 2026
+2
I think another reason it feels so jarring is the *type* of show. The more I think about it it seems like that sort of thing mostly stuck around in the form of reality shows and other “low tier” TV, it wasn’t very common in scripted TV.
In scripted TV you’d typically have more subtle stuff like all the computers in the background being Macs with the Apple logo visible, except for the one episode where a computer broke or got a virus when it would inexplicably be a generic PC with no branding. Or some shows might have a character push the voice control button in their car to ask for GPS directions, no overt references to the brand but they’d certainly zoom in to make sure you caught it. Usually the only times you’d get overt name drops would be in comedy shows either making fun of or lampshading the practice.
But reality shows were often a lot more shameless with the brand integrations. I have vague memories of the first season of American Idol featuring like heavily sponsored day trips for the contestants between rounds where they’d do lots of product placement and name drops, and of course rewards and prizes on reality shows and game shows would often just be plain old ads for the products. If some dating show had them all take Waymos to dinner or something nobody would bat an eye, it’s when the scripted shows do it that it feels forced.
Also for a long time it was seen as kind of “off limits” in the industry. Like it happened and corporations and perhaps even networks wanted to push it, but it was seen as selling out and stronger creative leads would push against it. There was an episode of The Larry Sanders Show about the network forcing brand integration and the whole subtext was that it was beneath them and a sellout move that made Larry and the producers look weak. And when other shows addressed it it tended to feel like saying “we’re above this, you can’t make us do it”, or “we’ll do it but lampshade it and not take it seriously”. If the show was big or had a strong team they could rise above it and not stoop to that level, and for a long time with “peak TV” there was plenty of audience and ad revenue to go around so maybe it wasn’t pushed as much to not upset the balance.
It feels like creative control and integrity is maybe at an all-time high for particular creators who have a lot of clout and pull but also lowering across the board for everyone else. If you want a new show and aren’t the guy the network gave a blank check contract to you have to submit to demands of brand integration or stupid stuff like verbalizing the action on screen for people second-screening the show. And that’s a big part of what makes it feel so new and different, because it’s showing up in the types of shows that didn’t used to be subject to that kind of thing, at least not as obviously.
2
kristinL356Apr 12, 2026
+9
Be glad you're not watching kdramas lol
9
superkeerApr 13, 2026
+5
I love kdrama product placement. They've leaned so far into it that you start to appreciate the subtle art of handing your dreamy love interest a caffeine pick-me-up.
5
kristinL356Apr 13, 2026
+3
While making sure the label is perfectly positioned facing towards the camera
3
TuckyeEastApr 12, 2026
+3
Kopiko is the best character in any kdrama!
Also Eggdrop sandwiches look delicious
3
davidswintonApr 12, 2026
+5
Just watch Can’t Stop the Music from 1980 and it’s just as clunky with Dr. Pepper and Baskin Robins integrations
5
TrueBlueFriendApr 12, 2026
+4
[subway strikes again with Hawaii 5-0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQYwFND7rHE)
4
JunkMale975Apr 13, 2026
+5
I hate this one so much.
[The Rookie](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKP0xAdxTj4)
5
AussieDog87Apr 12, 2026
+8
I'm normally blind to product placements, but I recently got into Ghosts and several times they've had an item ordered through Amazon Prime.
8
General_Disaray_1974Apr 13, 2026
+3
The Domino's pizza on Mars in the most recent *For All Mankind* caught me off guard.
3
SapTheSapientApr 13, 2026
+2
Domino's stands out so much on that show, I think, because they're logo doesn't fit with the show's color palette. Everything is so muted and industrial, and then there's the big Domino's sign.
2
PremislausApr 13, 2026
+3
Are you sure this is a new thing? Let me Bing that
3
CMDR_omnicognateApr 12, 2026
+2
Becoming? I feel like especially US shows have kinda always been like this
2
MistyPowerApr 12, 2026
+2
CBS Ghosts has some really awkward Amazon advertising. It’s very obvious and the dialogue can be very cringy.
2
shmammerheadApr 13, 2026
+2
Next Level Chef had a laughable “I can’t believe it’s not butter” ad on its last episode where contestants had to use it in their dishes. Richard Blais even said he, “…had it in his fridge.” As if Michelin Star chefs would ever. Honestly can’t believe they allowed it.
2
aLegionOfDavidsApr 13, 2026
+2
Oh my god the High Potential one actually almost made me and my partner stop watching. Like, it was SO BAD. Even the actress like, stopped acting when she was doing that bit and it was just such an obvious plug. We are still a little mad about it…both of us are having AI shoved down our throats at work and it’s so far just making things 4x harder.
2
StarChild413Apr 13, 2026
+2
The Elsbeth thing wasn't too bad, the High Potential thing wouldn't have felt as bad as it did if A. it wasn't in such an otherwise emotional episode and B. if I could find a way to wrap my head around it Watsonianly (as yeah it was kinda an off moment but the way some people talk about it you'd think the show went full The-Truman-Show with how that movie did the in-show-native-advertising) as maybe if they didn't mention CoPilot specifically they could have an episode dealing with the consequences
Also that wasn't the worst in-universe-use-of-AI by a procedural when Matlock literally had parenting and legal decisions being made by AI "resurrections" of dead people
2
AlphaTangoFoxtrtApr 13, 2026
+2
*Sellier & Bellot* in fallout was jarring as f***. Like bro that's a box from 2010 at the earliest. Like I have that exact box, literally dozens of them, sitting in my gun room. At least make some fake-ass 50s-esque ammo boxes.
2
imforitApr 14, 2026
+2
The Copilot plug on High Potential was indeed JARRING.
My sister in christ, this is EXACTLY the kind of thing where the subtle details need to be actually truly correct, not just sound convincing.
Police are probably relying on AI hallucinations left and right and I simply don't want to think about that
2
Pon_deApr 12, 2026
+2
Abbot Elementary had a decent one recently for a new kleenex easy open container.
2
UncleBuckRedditApr 12, 2026
+1
Love story on fx had a pretty egregious KFC brand integration lol
1
thatditzyguyApr 12, 2026
+1
You're forgetting the boys with sister sage shoving her taco bell into the dialogue
1
TitSharkApr 12, 2026
+1
I wouldn’t hate it as much if we didn’t also have the same/higher commercial times
1
HLOFRNDApr 12, 2026
+1
I don't really think the Lyft drop in The Pitt was exactly good publicity, though. 😂
1
hnglmkrnglbrryApr 13, 2026
+1
I mean they all wear Figs scrubs and have them in their vending machine. Go to an ER and only a few of the doctors and the boujee nurses wear Figs. In the vending machine are just old sacks of potatoes.
1
rdgarlicApr 13, 2026
+1
Hawaii five O's subway ad was hilarious
1
MacDoesRedditApr 13, 2026
+1
The High Potential one was very funny to me due to the fact that Microsoft had to have seen that scene, where (at least semi-)privileged police information is fed into a public facing LLM, and signed off on it. That, and the fact that it was so obviously a copilot ad mid scene, of course.
I haven’t watched The Pitt, but it seems they could’ve easily said taxi or Uber instead of Lyft and got the same point across, so I doubt it was *that* jarring.
Edit: I watched the Elsbeth episode. The person's screen isn't even visible, she just mentions that "Google Lens says" that two pots are slightly different colors. That's not jarring, and is barely even product placement.
1
Barf_The_MawgApr 13, 2026
+1
The Prius commercials from Bones were the first time it ever really jumped out at me.
It wasn't just a couple logos here and there, unprompted, the Bones Actress sat there and described features of the car as if she were doing an actual commercial for like 30 seconds.
1
mommyaiaiApr 13, 2026
+1
There was an old SYFY show called Eureka that took brand integration to the next level. There was an entire season that involved Degree deoderant. The funny thing was it somehow wasn't super jarring even though it literally became a plot device. They had a similar season with Subaru.
And their successor Warehouse 13 had an unhealthy obsession with Priuses.
1
oozekipApr 13, 2026
+1
IIRC HBO, at least historically, does not do paid product placement. If you hear a product referenced it was because the writers chose to include that reference for whatever reason, not because a brand paid them to.
(I don't know if that's changed in recent years, but I also can't find anything to the contrary, so I'm assuming it's still the case)
1
edgeplotApr 13, 2026
+1
Regarding The Pitt using Lyft, what would have been more distracting? Using Lyft (whether or not it was a paid placement), an actual brand, or making up some fake name of a fake brand, for phrasing things awkwardly so as to avoid naming any app?
1
ThePr0viderApr 13, 2026
+1
brought to you by carls junior
1
meatball77Apr 13, 2026
+1
Eeh, they're great compared to what they used to be.
Remember Bones. She was always talking about the car she was driving.
Chuck's Subway integration was so good that fans would go buy sandwiches to try to keep the show on the air.
1
fothergillfuckupApr 13, 2026
+1
Like Nutella....
1
MtPolluxApr 13, 2026
+1
I can't believe no one has mentioned The Office. They spent so much time at Chili's and Staples that I wondered if those were the only big chains in Scranton.
The second season of Heroes had a few ham handed placements by Nissan. Hiro and his friend (Ando?) were looking for someone based on the car they drove, and at some point in the middle of a conversation in Japanese they both said in English "blue Nissan Versa". Also that season, teenager Claire asks her dad if she can take his car, but instead of saying "can I take your car" she says "can I take the Rogue?". I think they had previously made a point of mentioning that he had a Nissan Rogue.
1
Familiar-Banana-8116Apr 13, 2026
+1
Lyft with The Pitt was done well.
The jarring part was that 'Lyft' is the 'Pepsi' to 'Uber's 'Coke'.
If he had called her an Uber instead it wouldn't have registered as out of place.
The entire bit was done well and reflected a bit in Season 1 where one of the doctor's (my brain says Langdon, I think my brain is wrong) to have medication run to someone's house that couldn't afford the medecine.
1
kristy3mApr 13, 2026
+1
Ah yes, and lyft did a cutsie response in social media refunding the surcharge to Whitaker.
1
BilverBurferApr 13, 2026
+1
Just watched Mike & Nick & Nick & Alice last night. Fun movie but there's a shot where a character sits down on the couch and opens a bag of Doritos Dinamita, and it just lingers on the shot of the bag pointed directly at the camera for like 10 seconds. I had to laugh
1
4EcwXIlhS9BQxC8Apr 13, 2026
+1
The car commercial in a bones episode stands out in my mind as one of the most absurd I've seen.
1
MidwestTroy92Apr 13, 2026
+1
The Lyft one in The Pitt was brutal lol. Felt like somebody from marketing wandered onto the set for 10 seconds.
1
LiontreebleApr 13, 2026
+1
How was the the Pitt scene clunky? Whittaker just sees this old lady and tells her he'll order her a lyft and then shortly explains to her what it is when she asks. Ordering someone a Lyft is just something people say, I've heard Americans say that and I'm not even American. I could maybe see the explanation being clunky, but it makes sense an elderly person wouldn't know Lyft. Also googling it lyft actually offers hospital transportation in Pennsylvania and other states. I'm honestly pretty sure this wasn't a product placement and just showcased both a real thing that happens in hospitals and works as characterization for Whittaker.
1
ArchDuckyApr 13, 2026
+1
Lyft on The Pitt?!? That was 100% for the joke that she puked in the back of his car and killed his account.
1
melithiumApr 13, 2026
+1
Olive Garden and Shrinking was decently done
1
henry_thedestroyerApr 13, 2026
+1
Emily in Paris is the worst shit for this that I’ve ever seen
1
illini02Apr 13, 2026
+1
The High Potential one last week REALLY took me out of it. Because the way she was talking about what copilot was doing just seemed so much like a commercial.
The Lyft thing on the Pitt I could almost tolerate, just because it seemed to fit the story about an older woman with no way to get home.
1
DataDude00Apr 13, 2026
+1
The High Potential Copilot scene was the most cringe thing I have seen on TV in a long time.
Like a character literally just said "Copilot can solve this for us" and grabbed a Surface branded laptop on her desk, turned the screen towards the camera and started repeating advertising points
1
JosephNarrowsApr 13, 2026
+1
Scrubs & Carhart
1
KaneidaApr 14, 2026
+1
Then again how many of todays people call for taxis? Majority use Lyft/Uber etc equivalent.
194 Comments