· 200 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 31, 2026 at 7:21 AM

Can you name two movies that were released in the same year but feel like they were released years apart?

Posted by coreybudz


Last night, I rewatched the movie “HEAT.” When I saw Val Kilmer’s name on screen, I wondered if this was before or after “Batman Forever.” Surprisingly, it turns out that “HEAT” (1995) was released the same year “Batman Forever” (1995). I was only six years old at the time, so it seems incredible that these movies were released so close together. Extra points if the movie shares actors!!

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
gozroth Mar 31, 2026 +886
Alien and Star Trek: The Motion Picture They feel like they're decades apart if you watch them now
886
SouthernCoyote247 Mar 31, 2026 +457
Star Trek feels like the last ‘60s movie, Alien feels like the first ‘80s movie 
457
D_Warholb Mar 31, 2026 +37
The first Star Trek is solidly a 70’s movie, specifically because of Disco Bones in his open chested polyester white suit and gold chain.
37
IndianSurveyDrone Mar 31, 2026 +59
Interesting way of putting it. Especially considering the strong 2001 influences in TMP.
59
FrostyD7 Mar 31, 2026 +30
Makes sense, their goals were polar opposites. Alien was pioneering numerous action/scifi concepts whereas Star Trek was paying homage to 2001 A Space Odyssey.
30
CrispyHoneyBeef Mar 31, 2026 +22
There was almost no action in Alien. It’s as close to pure horror as Sci-Fi can get.
22
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +68
Same year? Holy shit.
68
[deleted] Mar 31, 2026 +16
[deleted]
16
adreddit298 Mar 31, 2026 +113
ST feels like a throwback to the 60s or 70s. Alien feels like it exists in the future.
113
drifters74 Mar 31, 2026 +58
Alien has that gritty, used future look to it
58
tdasnowman Mar 31, 2026 +8
And Star Trek represents a post scarcity society. The are opposing view points of the future. They are supposed to look dramatically different.
8
disp0ss3ss3d Mar 31, 2026 +70
Alien looks timeless; ST looks dated.
70
Showdown5618 Mar 31, 2026 +13
To me, Star Trek feels like 70s space epic, and Alien feels like 80s horror film.
13
thehandofdawn Mar 31, 2026 +27
I would have assumed Star Trek was part of a slightly earlier 'classic' wave of science fiction movies that Alien was responding to
27
zapatocaviar Mar 31, 2026 +21
Yeah, it’s the acting. Alien is more modern and method. ST is more set up and stiff blocking. I like both but I hear you.
21
PilotedByGhosts Mar 31, 2026 +6
It kind of is. The first Star Trek movie was a decade after the TV series finished.
6
Public_Fucking_Media Mar 31, 2026 +13
TV people making a Movie vs Ridley motherfucking Scott making one
13
flingebunt Mar 31, 2026 +13
Both feel like they are from that era, just different genres. 
13
Tr0nLenon Mar 31, 2026 +852
It'll always blow my mind that Spielberg made Jurassic Park AND Schindler's List simultaneously in '93.
852
Plane-Tie6392 Mar 31, 2026 +225
Jurassic was '92 and he started on Schindler's List 3 months later in '93. Both were released the same year though.
225
RacingNeilo Mar 31, 2026 +133
He was editing jurrassic park imwhile filming schindlers list.
133
RumHamComesback Mar 31, 2026 +53
He talked about this during an interview with Stephen Colbert and he said the only two things left were color correction and sound mixing. Everything else was done and he left it to George Lucas to finish it up. He said it was because he needed to film Schindler's List in Poland in the winter to get the full effect thus needed to get started now.
53
Plane-Tie6392 Mar 31, 2026 +15
Wiki says, "[Editing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_editing) had already started during filming, and within days of wrapping, Kahn had a [rough cut](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_cut) ready, allowing Spielberg to start filming [*Schindler's List*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_List).." Do you know how much editing he did compared to Kahn? Either way there was some work done on both at the same time but I still think it's a bit inaccurate to say simultaneously.
15
GuildensternLives Mar 31, 2026 +19
Spielberg was there for "the edit" but Kahn edited the film. [The film was finished editing but had some post-production work still to do, so Kathleen Kennedy and George Lucas stepped in to help finish the pic.](https://youtu.be/Ats3sY26kcM?t=114)
19
Reisklok Mar 31, 2026 +11
I've read that it was mostly post-production CGI stuff. Like, he'd work on Schindler's List during the day, and then go back to where he was staying for the night and either critique or approve CGI shots via video conferencing.
11
VerilyShelly Mar 31, 2026 +6
Yeah, I can't imagine he was trying to edit scenes for tone with his mind occupied by a film as far as it could possibly be from the family-friendly whimsy of a dinosaur movie.
6
iamcharity Mar 31, 2026 +11
I don’t know that I would call Jurassic Park family friendly whimsy. It’s kind of a sci-fi horror movie.
11
VerilyShelly Mar 31, 2026 +13
Compared to Schindler's List it kinda is
13
Plane-Tie6392 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Yeah, I mean Schindler's List had nudity.
6
Cripnite Mar 31, 2026 +13
When did he make Schindler’s List 2?
13
Hoodeddragon Mar 31, 2026 +7
I read it as Schindler’s List 3 as well!
7
fuxoft Mar 31, 2026 +17
That was no coincidence. Universal basically told him "We will let you make your weird black and white 3-hour artfilm if you give us dinosaurs."
17
rapiertwit Mar 31, 2026 +6
And then the weird depressing black and white art film made them a boatload of money because Spielberg. His “one for me” still crushed at the box office. Good for him starting his own store after that.
6
sosodank Mar 31, 2026 +73
What's even more amazing is that it was originally supposed to be a single movie, Schindler's Park, where Jews and saurians came together to help the Allies develop the atomic bomb. Spielberg only changed his plans after bingewatching sifl-n-olly while shitting himself hoarse from olestra chips. "Spielberg phone home" he groaned, gripping the seat so as not to be launched skyward. "Aryans...saurians...non-trinitarians..." It all became clear.
73
pantstoaknifefight2 Mar 31, 2026 +13
Olestra chips... There's a product I haven't heard about since the last time I shit my pants.
13
WartimeHotTot Mar 31, 2026 +4
I thought they figured out a new formulation that resulted in 10% less a*** leakage?
4
pantstoaknifefight2 Mar 31, 2026 +3
"I'd buy that for a dollar!"
3
Heimatlos-Malot Mar 31, 2026 +8
"Shitting himself hoarse" is amazing prose. Shitting so long and hard that his voice was engaged and worn out? Shitting untill his sphincter was exhausted and his farts had vocal fry? So much magic possible in that little turn of phrase.
8
grimgrinning Mar 31, 2026 +7
Not a Sifl & Olly ref
7
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +25
This one I didn’t know. I’m going to be up all night thinking about this one lol
25
Tr0nLenon Mar 31, 2026 +23
Lol yeah it kinda evolves the revelation.. like, not only are both the films incredible.. they're both wildly different.. both directed by the same guy.. in the same year Had to share, figured you'd appreciate it 😉
23
brainkandy87 Mar 31, 2026 +3
One of many reasons Spielberg is the GOAT imo.
3
APracticalGal Mar 31, 2026 +4
Spielberg has had some wild double-bill years. '89 had The Last Crusade and Always, '93 as mentioned, '97 with The Lost World and Amistad, '05 with War of the Worlds and Munich, and '11 with War Horse and Tintin
4
Chessh2036 Mar 31, 2026 +8
He had George Lucas help with some of the post production on Jurassic Park 😂 it really is crazy he made them both in the same year
8
Wide_Okra_7028 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Actually, he chose to start with *Jurassic Park* first because he knew he wouldn’t be able to do a dinosaur film after he finished *Schindler’s List*.
6
rixxxand Mar 31, 2026 +5
Spielberg legitimately has multiple phases of his career that by themselves would be a legendary directing career. The early run of Jaws, Indiana Jones, ET, Hook. The 90s with JP, Schindler List, and Saving Private Ryan. The later part of his career with Lincoln, Minority Report, Munich, Catch me if you can, Bridge of Spies, etc. Crazy
5
-KFBR392 Mar 31, 2026 +382
St Elmo’s Fire and Breakfast Club were both released in 1985, just months apart. But it’s a trip because you got 3 of the same actors who just played high school kids now playing mid-20’s yuppies (and portraying them as super mature and come off even older when you don’t listen to their backstory of just being uni grads). I always assumed St Elmo’s came years later.
382
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +37
This is a great one.
37
Setanta777 Mar 31, 2026 +4
I didn't know that. I always considered St. Elmo's to be a stealth sequel to The Breakfast Club.
4
CaptDrunkenstein Apr 1, 2026 +2
Was St Elmo's Fire any good? I've seen Breakfast Club like 30 times, weirdly never seen St Elmo's Fire
2
_buffy_summers Apr 1, 2026 +3
St. Elmo's Fire isn't something you'll like, if you've seen The Breakfast Club that many times. I say this as someone who has seen The Breakfast Club about the same number of times. St. Elmo's Fire is still a John Hughes movie, but it's like he had just read a bunch of Bret Easton Ellis novels, so all of his characters in St. Elmo's Fire are self-absorbed jerks. If you do watch it and need to restore your view of John Hughes, I recommend Some Kind of Wonderful.
3
CaptDrunkenstein Apr 1, 2026 +3
This is perfect analysis thank you
3
BossKei Mar 31, 2026 +192
Ratatouille and Meet the Robinsons (both in 2007). Visually, Meet the Robinsons looks like an early CG film, Ratatouille’s artistry still holds up today (especially the attention to detail on the food).
192
Hufa123 Mar 31, 2026 +53
2007 was also when the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie came out, which is still probably has the best CGI of any movie ever in Davy Jones.
53
bbeccarr Mar 31, 2026 +23
Iirc, meet the Robinsons started production around 2004 and was in development hell around 2006 when Disney acquired Pixar. Parts of the movie were scrapped and reworked which is why it looks a bit dated to have come out in 2007. I remember an early trailer for it in front of another movie we owned as kids in like 05-06 but it was just a teaser. When it finally did come out I remember thinking “didn’t that movie already come out?” The original release date was december 15 2006 but it was pushed back to march 30 2007.
23
ze_ex_21 Mar 31, 2026 +3
The following year: Wall-E and Delgo
3
Writer_feetlover Mar 31, 2026 +142
Arnold Schwartzeneggar had very different movies come out the same year on several occasions. Conan/Terminator (1984). Twins and Red Heat (1988), Kindergarten Cop and Total Recall (1990) True Lies and Junior (1994)
142
Bill_Parker Mar 31, 2026 +68
The Rock could have had an even more ridiculous film career if he had learned to balance his role choices like Schwarzenegger did.
68
FeedMeACat Mar 31, 2026 +52
The Rock has the clause of not losing in a fight. Arnie loses in a fight to children.
52
RumHamComesback Mar 31, 2026 +12
Which is strange because Rock has no problem losing matches in wrestling. It's Hogan who refused to do jobs because "doesn't work for me brother".
12
Rohml Mar 31, 2026 +11
Dwayne Johnson had no creative control of what happened to The Rock while working for the WWF. This is much different when he became a Hollywood star that consistently drew audiences to projects he is involved in. His character also lost in The Mummy Returns, so this clause really came up after he became successful.
11
Kaertos Mar 31, 2026 +257
I'll toss out an example of two movies that made a ton of money, were both considered good, but completely on opposite ends of the pop culture scale... 1977 Star Wars & Smokey and the Bandit
257
CoderDevo Mar 31, 2026 +158
To which TV responded with Battlestar Galactica and The Dukes of Hazzard.
158
jamjamason Mar 31, 2026 +63
Looks like them Cylons are in a heap o trouble, Cooter.
63
umfum Mar 31, 2026 +11
Your Cooter's in a heapa trouble, Cylon.
11
kkngs Mar 31, 2026 +10
Somehow I never put that together
10
reten Mar 31, 2026 +11
Good one - same year also - The Black Hole by Disney Correction: 1979 - two years later.
11
dedsqwirl Mar 31, 2026 +20
If you want to compare something crazy, Logan's Run was made in 1976 and won an Oscar for best special effects. Then compare that to Star Wars 1 year later. Logan's Run budget of $9 million. Star Wars IV budget of $11 million.
20
jkmhawk Mar 31, 2026 +4
They were released only 11 months apart, so might fit in this depending on what op had in mind
4
ifinallyreallyreddit Mar 31, 2026 +4
One is a movie about two guys and their furry companion driving fast vehicles to evade the authorities and picking up a woman on the way, and the other is Smokey and the Bandit.
4
AmeliaMangan Mar 31, 2026 +184
Catwoman and Batman Begins had eleven months between them, and if you didn't know better you'd swear it was eleven years. Absolutely *nothing* about these two films indicates they're even from the same decade, let alone the same year. ...And you know, I'm too lazy to do it, but there are probably some interesting observations to be made here about the former representing the death-rattle of superhero films' past and the latter representing the first indrawn breath of the genre's future, and how that's turned out to be both for better and worse. (In particular, the loss of the earlier superhero films' more freewheeling, laissez-faire approach to 'canon' - you rarely get shite like Catwoman or Daredevil or Elektra these days, the hilarious ongoing efforts of Sony to make Spider-Man Without Spider-Man notwithstanding; but you also don't get fascinating hyperstylized weirdo experiments like the Burton Batfilms, D*** Tracy, Tank Girl, The Shadow etc.)
184
ja5143kh5egl24br1srt Mar 31, 2026 +24
The old Batman movies feel so low budget and campy compared to the ones from Batman begins on. It’s like they went out of their way to make it feel like a cartoon.
24
MCWizardYT Mar 31, 2026 +50
Well they're based on a comic that was originally light and cartoony Dark gritty batman is a more modern thing
50
bretshitmanshart Mar 31, 2026 +20
Original Batman was pretty dark and grim. He generally killed the criminals. It got lighter when they brought in Robin to appeal to kids and especially when the Comic Code Authority existed.
20
_galaga_ Mar 31, 2026 +16
The Batman of my youth was Adam West so that made Michael Keaton’s Batman much more serious.
16
Tanthiel Mar 31, 2026 +3
The original issues from the 40s were dark and gritty, the light and cartoony Batman is really more post-Comics Code to early 70s.
3
kielbasa330 Mar 31, 2026 +44
At the time 89 batman was seen as dark and gritty.
44
MadBones359 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Man, I would be sad to live in a world without 'The Shadow'.  That movie was fantastic.
3
AmeliaMangan Mar 31, 2026 +3
Sure, the Dark Knight Trilogy is great and all, but do any of those films have [a Jim Steinman-penned, Taylor Dayne-sung, ten-car-pileup of a rock-opera power ballad](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXpWfd1BNkQ) playing over the end credits? No. None of them do. Advantage: The Shadow
3
johnsons_son Mar 31, 2026 +2
We did almost have a creative fork in the road at the time with Sin City and to a lesser extent 300, but yeah everything went the way of Batman, and the Dark Knight really cemented the era we’ve been in for the last 20 years.
2
Vesalii Mar 31, 2026 +2
What the hell that's just absurd! Catwoman does indeed feel a decade older.
2
zowietremendously Mar 31, 2026 +96
The Room and Finding Nemo. I didn't know about The Room until years later.
96
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +20
The room? With Brie Larson?
20
TrentonTallywacker Mar 31, 2026 +91
YOURE TEARING ME APART LARSON!!
91
Dagobert_Krikelin Mar 31, 2026 +39
I believe that's only called "Room" Probably because The Room was taken 😅
39
NazzerDawk Mar 31, 2026 +4
Nah, there are plenty of films with fully shared names. It isn't like actors who have a place their names get registered that forces them to be unique.
4
Dagobert_Krikelin Mar 31, 2026 +4
No, you're right, but how does that work exactly? You can't really release two movies with the same name, the same year can you? And what if I want to make a movie and name it The Matrix.
4
DannySantoro Mar 31, 2026 +7
You would TECHNICALLY be able to do that as long as you weren't trying to deceive the audience - avoid green scrolly text, the life is a simulation thing, and don't style it the same way. You'll still probably be sued because lawyers exist, but that goes for everything.
7
zowietremendously Mar 31, 2026 +9
The one with the legendary Tommy Wiseau
9
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +7
My bad I completely forgot about “THE ROOM” lol
7
CeruleanBlew Mar 31, 2026 +80
Two of my favorite movies are Mission: Impossible III and C***** Royale. Both came out in 2006, but M:I3 seems much longer ago for some reason.
80
TheNonCredibleHulk Apr 1, 2026 +10
I definitely think MI3 is the best in the series. I really thought it came out in 06 and C***** Royale in 07
10
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +9
Wow yes remember seeing both movies in theaters but mission 3 feels older.
9
Rdubya291 Mar 31, 2026 +4
I think it was the filming style. C***** Royale had a much more muted 'tech' tone. It just felt... more polished. MI3 just seemed like another rinse and repeat.
4
WoodpeckerHead8789 Mar 31, 2026 +96
Superman 2, Raiders of the Lost Ark, An American Werewolf in London...and Clash of the Titans, which looks like a Disney movie from the 60's.  Also, some Herbie movies. And Heavy Metal. 
96
blackpony04 Mar 31, 2026 +27
Comparing Raiders to Titans is perfect for this. Both period peices, and yet the special effects styles were so glaringly different. And yes, Raiders had a bigger budget, but only by about 25% ($20M vs $15M). But boy, did they spend it well. I saw both movies as an 11 year old in 1981 and loved them both. Raiders is still my favorite movie of all time.
27
jamjamason Mar 31, 2026 +14
You belong in a museum!
14
blackpony04 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Raiders made me a huge history buff and while I took archeology in college, I got my degree in History (and Political Science). I absolutely do belong in a museum!
10
disturbed286 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Do you happen to own a fedora and/or a whip?
3
blackpony04 Mar 31, 2026 +4
Nope, but I haven't shaved in a few days and practically everything hurts.
4
7ach-attach Apr 1, 2026 +3
It’s not years, it’s the mileage.
3
downvote_meme_errors Apr 1, 2026 +3
> but only by about 25% ($20M vs $15M). That's 33% more.
3
SpaceForceAwakens Mar 31, 2026 +5
I always thought Clash was from the 60s. This is blowing my mind.
5
Sumeriandawn Mar 31, 2026 +100
Lawrence of Arabia To Kill a Mockingbird
100
wailonskydog Mar 31, 2026 +27
Also Lawrence of Arabia and Cleopatra. Cleopatra came out after Lawrence but it feels like a classic old Hollywood sword and sandals movie with artificial looking sets and overacting. LoA is a modern masterpiece that embraced (and invented a lot of) the future of film.
27
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +3
Two movies I have yet to watch. It’ll be interesting to see the difference in quality.
3
haysoos2 Mar 31, 2026 +38
It's not so much a difference in quality. Both movies are absolutely top-tier masterpieces. But To Kill a Mockingbird is black & white, with tight, close blocking, and editing that emphasizes dialogue over action. At a glance it fits into the classic cinematic tradition of Casablanca, or It's a Wonderful Life, and you could believe it had been filmed at the time the movie was set. Lawrence of Arabia is a sweeping historic epic shot in Super Panavision, and printed in 70 mm, with broad, sweeping vistas in brilliant colour showcasing the desert setting. Film blocking, composition, and editing are all modified to prioritize that widescreen vista. So they look very, very different. In many ways they are emblematic of the old school vs new cinema approach to film making.
38
bongo1100 Mar 31, 2026 +28
Goodfellas and Home Alone, both starring Joe Pesci
28
TheNonCredibleHulk Apr 1, 2026 +6
Goodfellas and My Blue Heaven. Both released in 1990, and technically Goodfellas is a prequel to My Blue Heaven.
6
Effective_Coach7334 Mar 31, 2026 +45
Apocalypse Now Alien
45
Fadedcamo Mar 31, 2026 +21
I feel like we cna put alien with any movie from that year and it'll feel ahead of it.
21
Effective_Coach7334 Mar 31, 2026 +5
Alien Kramer vs Kramer =0)
5
fakebc Mar 31, 2026 +23
Blew my mind to realise Kurosawa's Ran came out the same year as Back To The Future (1985)
23
algorithmicamalgam Mar 31, 2026 +17
The Matrix and Office Space
17
ohfuckimdrunk Apr 1, 2026 +6
When you get right down to it, they're about the same thing really
6
[deleted] Mar 31, 2026 +90
[removed]
90
mdmnl Mar 31, 2026 +28
The contrasting pair, for me, is Shawshank and Natural Born Killers. Shawshank is almost leisurely in pacing, the production design is impeccable - the inmates' clothing, the furniture in the warden's office, the vehicles - and it's an often dark but ultimately hopeful film about friendship. While I haven't seen NBK in ages, I remember it being vulgar, twitchy, garish and flashy. I know it has its fans, but I never took to it. The comparison is more stark for me because my then girlfriend and I went to the cinema and chose between the two on my birthday. I chose poorly... Edit: choosing the film AND the girlfriend.
28
DrVurt Mar 31, 2026 +5
Let's give that key lime pie a day in court
5
pantstoaknifefight2 Mar 31, 2026 +3
A classic example of a Tarantino line.
3
ja5143kh5egl24br1srt Mar 31, 2026 +3
Pulp fiction feels like 2000 and Shawshank Redemption feels like 1980.
3
ThatsARatHat Mar 31, 2026 +21
I feel completely the opposite. Pulp Fiction to me feels almost overwhelmingly 90s; so much so the 90s wouldn’t exist without it (like Nirvana or Seinfeld). Whereas Shawshank could have come out any decade ever and fit.
21
tjalek Mar 31, 2026 +39
Eyes Wide Shut and The Matrix. They don't even feel like they're in the same century, let alone the same year. I actually notice the audio the most, it sounds like an older film while the sound in The Matrix is super sharp and clear.
39
Fadedcamo Mar 31, 2026 +18
I think this was done on purpose in some ways to add to the dreamy off feeling of the film. The green screen walking scene was def chosen for such.
18
Badnapp420 Mar 31, 2026 +6
The Matrix changed cinema for me. The part where Neo and Trinity lit up the lobby was unlike anything I’d seen before.
6
EggElectrical669 Mar 31, 2026 +24
Jurassic Park and Schindler’s List both dropped in 1993 and that still messes with me. Same director, totally different vibe, feels like they came out years apart.
24
Wide_Okra_7028 Mar 31, 2026 +12
Here is the classic example of what you are asking for: *Doctor Dolittle* (1967) and *Bonnie and Clyde* (1967) both competed against each other at the 1968 Oscars and seemed to be made in two totally different eras of filmmaking. One was an overproduced musical with Rex Harrison that was old-fashioned and stuffy even by the standards of the ’60s, and the other an explosive and violent gangster film that ushered in the New Hollywood era.
12
kilkenny99 Mar 31, 2026 +3
You could probably look at the Oscar best picture nominees and find competing films that represented different / contrasting trends like that. 1994 Forrest Gump & Pulp Fiction come to mind. Or Do The Right Thing and Driving Miss Daisy in 1989.
3
ZorroMeansFox Mar 31, 2026 +10
1968 gave us both **The Love Bug** and **2001: A Space Odyssey**.
10
FX114 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Neither of them are movies, but I always get whiplash when I watch the Seinfeld episode that features a Green Day song.
10
WoWthenandNoW Mar 31, 2026 +34
Fight Club and Arlington Road Both great films but Fight club could easily be early to mid 2000s, while Arlington Road could be borderline late 80s and early 90s. Both 1999. Great year for film!
34
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +15
Fight club The matrix The mummy
15
drifters74 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Three great films
3
boba-fett-life Mar 31, 2026 +3
One amazing year for cinema.
3
flingebunt Mar 31, 2026 +46
Not the same year, but Star Wars was released in 1977 and the Disney made The Black Hole in 1979 because they wanted to cash in on the sci-fi thing, but it looked like it was made in the 1960s.
46
VikingTeddy Mar 31, 2026 +31
What has always stuck with me is that the last person to be executed by guillotine, was the same year as Star Wars came out. It feels like those things should be a century apart.
31
streakermaximus Mar 31, 2026 +9
Star Wars and Pete's Dragon both came out in '77
9
Successful-Tie5386 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Good point. And we're talking early '60s, not Rosemary's Baby time.
6
Empanatacion Mar 31, 2026 +19
That is crazy that it's been 8.5 years since Blade Runner 2049 came out.
19
LegacyLemur Mar 31, 2026 +3
And 23 years until 2049
3
Johncurtisreeve Mar 31, 2026 +18
The Lord of the rings, the Fellowship of the Ring, and Harry Potter and the sorcerer Stone.
18
APracticalGal Mar 31, 2026 +17
Two Towers, Chamber of Secrets, and Attack of the Clones all came out in 2002, which means we got our first real look at Gollum, Dobby, and the debut of cgi Yoda all in the same year. We needed our little digital freaks.
17
HoodsBreath10 Mar 31, 2026 +10
The difference in quality of CGI is so stark, especially comparing the troll fights
10
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +4
Oh wow. Yeah I forgot they were both 2001 if I remember correctly
4
AllStarSuperman_ Mar 31, 2026 +9
Ironman and The Dark Knight
9
MotorBobcat Mar 31, 2026 +7
2001: A Space Odyssey and Night Of The Living Dead. Both came out in 1968.
7
steeple_fun Mar 31, 2026 +7
The Lion King and Shawshank Redemption Lion King feels very 96-2000 and Shawshank feels very late 80s.
7
tokinmuskokan Mar 31, 2026 +6
Dumb & Dumber and Ace Ventura: Pet Detective Simply put: I find it hard to believe Jim Carrey put out two of the funniest movies of the decade barely 10 months apart from one another (Also, through researching this, I found out The Mask was also released in 1994 about mid way between D&D and AV:PD) Frankly 1994 was a crazy great year for movies Here's a short list of movies that came out in 94 Forrest Gump Pulp Fiction The Lion King Speed Dr Strangelove True Lies The Little Rascals Natural Born Killers The Shawshank Redemption Clerks Stargate The Pagemaster I feel like I'm missing a few, so feel free to add your favorite 94 movies
6
Public-Tiger-4791 Mar 31, 2026 +38
Matrix and dark city.
38
fuxoft Mar 31, 2026 +28
Matrix and Dark City even used the same rooftop sets.
28
joe12321 Mar 31, 2026 +11
This one seems perfectly sensible to me, but then I think about them together fairly often (along with The Thirteenth Floor and eXistenZ)!
11
Bill_Parker Mar 31, 2026 +10
different years... Dark City was 98 and Matrix was 99
10
jamjamason Mar 31, 2026 +6
I'll allow it.
6
nicolasknight Mar 31, 2026 +3
Holy SH\*\*. That blew my mind. I always thought of Dark City as a early 90's movie that INSPIRED the Matrix.
3
disp0ss3ss3d Mar 31, 2026 +19
The Prestige and The Illusionist are a pair. I remember there was a whole big thing about them releasing close together but now they seem like they're from two entirely different timelines.
19
coreybudz Mar 31, 2026 +10
Prestige being the better film. I think I’ve only watched the illusionist 2-3 times. It’s good. Not great. What Nolan does great is play with time. Makes the movie feel younger
10
disp0ss3ss3d Mar 31, 2026 +4
Agreed. I just rewatched the Prestige. While I thought The Illusionist was good, I don't really care to rewatch.
4
umbly-bumbly Mar 31, 2026 +25
ITT: answers to the question, "What is a good movie and a bad movie that came out in the same year?"
25
kneeco28 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Planet of the Apes and 2001
6
Lost-Potato3894 Mar 31, 2026 +19
Blade Runner 2049 and The Emoji Movie both came out in 2017 and I still can't wrap my head around that. One's this gorgeous, thoughtful sci-fi masterpiece and the other... well, exists. Also wild that Get Out and Fifty Shades Darker were the same year. Talk about a spectrum of quality right there.
19
mdmnl Mar 31, 2026 +19
>One's this gorgeous, thoughtful sci-fi masterpiece and the other... well, exists. I thought you were going to give the old "One's this gorgeous, thoughtful sci-fi masterpiece and the other... is Blade Runner 2049"
19
HappyGilOHMYGOD Mar 31, 2026 +6
I dated a girl for 2 years that was moderately intelligent. One day she randomly became OBSESSED with the 50 shades movies and then broke up with me out of nowhere. I'm still confused by it lmao
6
DickButkisses Mar 31, 2026 +10
She had needs, bro
10
annie_leonhartt Mar 31, 2026 +4
maybe the social network and toy story 3 both in 2010. one feels so grounded and modern, the other feels timeless and almost from a different era somehow
4
fullmoon63 Mar 31, 2026 +4
No Country for Old Men and Transformers (both 2007). Same year, completely different universes.
4
SKULL1138 Mar 31, 2026 +3
The Shawshank Redemption and Clerks 1994
3
plushydoll333 Mar 31, 2026 +3
The Mummy and Magnolia.
3
helm_hammer_hand Mar 31, 2026 +4
The Dark Knight and Iron Man.
4
nananananana_FARTMAN Mar 31, 2026 +5
Oh I have one! Seven was released in 1995. The Usual Suspects was released in 1996. The production timeline between these movies overlap. But The Usual Suspects was made with a much less studio backing that it took longer to complete the final movie than Seven, so there was like 6 or 8 months gap between the release of these movies. Kevin Spacey actually did his part in Seven after he completed The Usual Suspects. Seven looks like it could’ve been made last year. The Usual Suspects, on other hand, shows age. It is a movie that distinctively looks like it was made in the 90s.
5
Kurt_Vonnegabe Mar 31, 2026 +5
Planet Of The Apes and 2001: A Space Odyssey both being in 1968 is kinda zany. And the fact that Planet Of The Apes won the Oscar for best costumes is kind of funny too.
5
res30stupid Mar 31, 2026 +3
1980; The Empire Strikes Back and Friday the 13th.
3
FOUREVER_04 Mar 31, 2026 +3
The Dark Knight & The Incredible Hulk
3
Mordor2112 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Flash Gordon and SW The Empire Strikes Back.
3
Negative-Vehicle7352 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Not a direct answer but when I (re)watched Terminator 2 (1991) and then some of the movies released around that same time, it never ceases to amaze me just how refined, timeless and well-done it was; everything else seemed almost shoddy in comparison, even when discussing films released a few years later. This is especially the case if you take into account one of the actors Robert Patrick, who previously and otherwise participated in mostly lower budget projects - to not say these can't be good necessarily. It might just be a James Cameron budget or direction thing, as everything he directed or helmed seemed to be of the super high quality and cost caliber like True Lies a bit down the line but equally epic as T2.
3
Emeraldsinger Mar 31, 2026 +3
The first Pirates of the Caribbean showed audiences back in ‘03 that movies based on Disney rides could in fact be great Then we got Haunted Mansion later that year 
3
A_Random_Sidequest Mar 31, 2026 +3
even worse: Cocoon is from 85 but feels early 70's Back to the Future and GhostBusters are from 84 but they're timeless!
3
GrantSays Mar 31, 2026 +3
Not the same calendar year, but "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" and "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles II: The Secret of the Ooze" were released just within one year of each other.
3
ms_merry Apr 1, 2026 +3
1968 Both nominated for best picture — Bonnie and Clyde & Dr. Doolittle
3
EataDisk Apr 1, 2026 +3
Two classics from 1971, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory along with Clockwork Orange.
3
adriandu Mar 31, 2026 +5
Dune (1984) & Aliens (1986). I love both films, but Dune feels very late 70's / early 80's to me in terms of special effects, costume and set design. Aliens is only 2 years later but feels decades newer in terms of effects, production design, cinematography and just style in general. It could easily be out of the mid-90's in terms of feel to me. Terminator 2 & Total Recall (both 1991). Both are amazing films, but Total Recall feels like an early 90's film while T2 feels like it belongs in the next century. Cameron really does an amazingly consistent job of producing films that are just on a whole other level and ahead of their time.
5
Damthemalltohelp Mar 31, 2026 +6
Val Kilmer was one of the hottest stars of the 1990s. 1 year later The Island of Doctor Moreau came out.  Fight Club and American Beauty. Fight Club being ahead of its time with similar themes.
6
captainalphabet Mar 31, 2026 +5
Fight Club and American Beauty are both firmly class of ‘99 I think. They even have similar themes.
5
VikingTeddy Mar 31, 2026 +5
Not a movie, but the last person to be executed by guillotine happened the same year as Star Wars came out. Like, you'd think they'd be a century apart.
5
HoodsBreath10 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Way off topic, but the reason the guillotine persisted as long as it did is it really is more humane for the person who is being executed. It’s just so gruesome for anyone viewing it
6
Fadedcamo Mar 31, 2026 +3
Yea we were sitll electrocuting in thie country in the 70s, right? Guillotine may be the better way to go.
3
PointOfFingers Mar 31, 2026 +4
Dobbie the Elf was in Chamber of Secrets in 2002. Two Towers brought us Gollum in 2002. Gollum looks years ahead. Harry Potter used a puppet and LOTR used mocap based on acting by Andy Serkis. Dobbie didn't get the full motion capture treatment until Deathly Hallows a few years later.
4
I-am-not-Herbert Mar 31, 2026 +6
I think Zendaya has four movies coming out this year. Odyssey and Spider-Man will probably even be in theaters at the same time.
6
HoodsBreath10 Mar 31, 2026 +5
Five - The Drama, The Odyssey, Avengers, SpiderMan, and Dune
5
I-am-not-Herbert Mar 31, 2026 +3
Oh, didn't know she'll also be in Doomsday.
3
HoodsBreath10 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Not sure that’s been confirmed yet actually now that you say it. So maybe only four.
3
Quarlo1970 Mar 31, 2026 +2
“The Green Slime” and 2001: A Space Odyssey” were both science fiction films released in 1968. “Slime” - a joint U.S. and Japanese production - a fun, campy space adventure/alien menace runs amok story with dated special effects. “2001” was a thought provoking mystery involving a menacing A.I. and mankind’s existence with amazing special effects.
2
joe12321 Mar 31, 2026 +2
My Own Private Idaho and Point Break. Maybe it's as much the difference in Reeves that sets them apart as their own style, and on that score you can throw in Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey.
2
tommyjohnpauljones Mar 31, 2026 +2
Blade Runner and Tootsie
2
MisteeLoo Mar 31, 2026 +2
Bruce Willis made Unbreakable, The Whole Nine Yards and The Kid in 2000. Each one shows a leap in his acting progression, so this one has the actor’s approach making it feel like the Kid was a wholesome fantasy, Unbreakable was noirish, and Nine Yards was a goofball rom-com with murder.
2
appuiromonsta Mar 31, 2026 +2
The 2023 movie Plane and literally anything else released that year. It feels like such an 80s movie in a very unintentional way
2
Odd_Theory_1031 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Star Wars & Smokey and the Bandit - 1977
2
zowietremendously Mar 31, 2026 +2
Well for me, that's most movies. Unless I was actively involved in their marketing campaigns, a lot of movies pass me by. The majority of movies I've seen in my life, I watched years after their initial release. Back in my day, I used to go to this place called blockbuster video. And they had movies galore on every shelf. Every single shelf in this store, had nothing but movies. They had every movie ever made. All in one place. Not like today, where movies on streaming are all over the place, or just not there. Blockbuster always had a copy of every "not on streaming" movie available to rent. And a lot of those movies, I watched years after they were released. So to me, when I watch them, I was in a completely different place in my life, compared to the movies I saw I the theaters the year that movie I rented from blockbuster originally was released. I miss blockbuster, and pre-social media life
2
lostinadream66 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Ace Ventura, the mask, dumb and dumber
2
mckulty Apr 1, 2026 +2
1971: Dirty Harry and Clockwork Orange.
2
elpantera88 Apr 1, 2026 +2
The matrix and the 13th warrior
2
arackan Apr 1, 2026 +2
Helen of Troy (2003) and Troy (2004). Vastly different in execution. Helen of Troy feels like a lat 90's movie, and certainly not like it came out same year as The Return of the King.
2
← Back to Board