· 105 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 21, 2026 at 6:14 PM

Canada plans to allow commercial space launches, reduce reliance on US

Posted by Immediate-Link490



🚩 Report this post

105 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
the_blackfish Apr 21, 2026 +49
Enter the Maplespace
49
cindylooboo Apr 21, 2026 +210
Let's gooooo 🇨🇦
210
New_Student1645 Apr 21, 2026 +46
Maritime Launch Services 🚀
46
Ray_Pingeau Apr 21, 2026 +10
I suggest MDA. They own 10% of MLS and aren’t limited to just being a launch service.
10
Pipnotiq Apr 21, 2026 +6
This is only one word off from being my actual works name 😂
6
maxmurder Apr 22, 2026 +8
Maritime Lunch Services
8
FakeRickHarrison Apr 22, 2026 +1
Loonie Toonie Space Agency
1
emezeekiel Apr 21, 2026 +19
We will be goooooing…. to polar orbits only. Which would be OK for many national security launches but most of those require medium to heavy lift launch vehicles which currently only have pads at Vandenburg or Cape Canaveral. So this will be limited to smallsats in polar (or sun synch) orbits, but it’s a start!
19
BrianWantsTruth Apr 21, 2026 +11
I heard about this new space initiative today, and I thought “that’s great, but what kind of orbits can we even offer?”
11
Acceptable_Noise651 Apr 22, 2026 +4
It’s good enough for Canada to have 100% launch control over their own satellites besides you guys have plenty of empty space to build a sweet launch site. Hopefully it works out well enough for Canada to eventually launch their own Astronauts into space. It would be pretty cool if the Artemis project started to have multiple countries for launches to scale things up quicker.
4
Sixstringthings Apr 21, 2026 +51
This would be a good time to have a Caribbean province [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed\_Canadian\_political\_association\_with\_the\_Turks\_and\_Caicos\_Islands](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_Canadian_political_association_with_the_Turks_and_Caicos_Islands)
51
yellow_banditos Apr 21, 2026 +35
Low lying , hurricane ally, everything would have to be shipped in. Very not Ideal location.
35
Old_Caterpillar_5385 Apr 21, 2026 +20
Carney should go to Cuba and strike the deal of a lifetime. (And no I’m not serious, Cubans want a free Cuba, but just imagining the look on Trump’s face makes me laugh)
20
ErmahgerdYuzername Apr 21, 2026 +8
Not that I want us to take Cuba from the Cubans but I’d love a Canadian province which is a Caribbean destination.
8
manfr57 Apr 21, 2026 +30
Si vous voulez, nous sommes prêts à vous prêter Kourou en Guyane pour vos vols spatiaux. De la part d'un cousin français
30
Conscious_Spare247 Apr 21, 2026 +18
We already have a commercial space launch complex on our eastern coast.
18
WABAJIM Apr 21, 2026 +14
Yep but, near the equator it's less expensive to launch to space. Alors moi je dis qu'on ne devrait pas dire non trop rapidement. 
14
Conscious_Spare247 Apr 21, 2026 +7
So you don't want Canada doing space launches. You want France doing them for us? Might as well just keep using US launch capability at that point. the whole point is building our own complex to launch commercial rockets.
7
OpeningTechnical5884 Apr 21, 2026 +2
Entirely depends on the orbit you're wanting. High inclination and polar orbits are more efficient from Canada than the equator.
2
Voltae Apr 21, 2026 +2
Cheaper and easier for equatorial/low inclination orbits, yes. For polar orbits, launching from Canada will be fine.
2
manfr57 Apr 21, 2026 +1
Ok, je ne savais pas merci pour l'info quoi qu'il en soit vous êtes tjrs les bienvenus.
1
NOT_EVEN_THAT_GUY Apr 21, 2026 +12
to the moon!
12
airship_of_arbitrary Apr 21, 2026 +6
God bless Jeremy Hansen.
6
NOT_EVEN_THAT_GUY Apr 22, 2026 +2
Moongod
2
slingbladde Apr 21, 2026 +6
More satellites for everyone..
6
grenamier Apr 21, 2026 +3
Whatever happened to Spar Aerospace?
3
Canada1971 Apr 21, 2026 +1
It was purchased by L3 Communications and largely went out of business although parts of it had previously become Ipart of what is now MDA Space.
1
YourOverlords Apr 21, 2026 +3
Black Brant is back baby!
3
Frankishe1 Apr 22, 2026 +1
Time to scare the shit out of the Russians again :D
1
Necessary-Music-6685 Apr 21, 2026 +32
Most space launches need to be from somewhere near to the equator to take advantage of the earth’s rotation to save fuel, so this seems mostly symbolic.
32
riko77can Apr 21, 2026 +55
The Baikonur Cosmodrome (one of the busiest launch sites over the history of launches) is even further north than the proposed site in Nova Scotia. What you’re saying only applies if you are seeking an equatorial or geostationary orbit. Higher latitude sites are common for polar, sun-synchronous, or high-inclination orbits and certainly have their use. It’s *not* just symbolic.
55
JerbTrooneet Apr 21, 2026 +11
For context the other Russian launch sites like Plesetsk and Vostochny are even further north than Baikonur and see frequent launches for satellites. Most of Canada would likely fall under similar latitudes to those sites so it's not unheard of to have far north rocket launch sites.
11
DaveidL Apr 21, 2026 +7
This guy geographies.
7
-ram_the_manparts- Apr 21, 2026 +6
And knows his rocket appliances.
6
Emergency-Hat-8715 Apr 22, 2026 +3
But apparently only has a rudimentary understanding of rocket launch sites. Launching from florida only gives an extra 80 m/s in free Delta from the earth's rotation. Less than 1% of a benefit to launch from Florida instead of Nova Scotia, big benefits in being outside of hurricanes and small outlying islands. It's different if you want to plane change to orbiting the equator. But why would Canada need that? Most domestic satellites would serve Canada and the European market. And if that's really important to you, use 2.7% of your mass budget, and run the ion thrusters intead of rocket fuel for a slow transition to equatorial geo over a reasonable timeframe. There's reason Russia China and Europe are more than comfortable launching spacecraft and nobody is beating down south america's doors for a percent or two gain in launch efficiency, and even then only when they absolutely need to launch the largest possible thing into equatorial geostationary orbit
3
binzoma Apr 21, 2026 +7
? new zealand has a commercial space launch programme. and nz is roughly the equiv latitude as canada also most of europe is north of the southern end of canada (where most people live), and lots of european countries launch satelites
7
Weak_Syllabub_7994 Apr 21, 2026 +11
Just to give people an idea of how much better it is to launch near the equator. It's cheaper for France to build rockets in Europe and then sail them all the way to South America to launch instead of just launching from Europe.
11
riko77can Apr 21, 2026 +6
That’s only true for geostationary satellites or equatorial orbits though. There are also plenty of satellite applications that don’t require that type of orbit and are suitable for northern latitude launches from sites such as Baikonur which has been one of the busiest launch sites historically.
6
JerbTrooneet Apr 21, 2026 +8
Equatorial launch sites also make sense for launches that need as much delta-V as possible since the Oberth effect reduces the amount of delta-V needed. The lower amount of inclination change burns also helps. It's why the James Webb Space Telescope launched from French Guiana since it needed as much delta-V it could to reach the Sun-Earth L2 Lagrange point. Though yeah equatorial launches aren't really needed for most satellite applications these days since those usually stay in LEO.
8
gwelfguy Apr 21, 2026 +21
Launches into geo-synchronous orbit, which is an equatorial orbit, benefit from being close to the equator. These days most launches are into low earth orbit, which are generally polar orbits. They do not benefit from being close to the equator. LEO launches may occur from Florida, California, French Guiana, etc. because they already have launch facilities.
21
Weak_Syllabub_7994 Apr 21, 2026 +13
>These days most launches are into low earth orbit, which are generally polar orbits. Where are you getting that from? Everything I've been able to find says that the vast majority of LEO satellites are *not* in polar orbits? Edit: Also, LEO satellites in non-polar orbits benefit from being near the equator too.
13
Dazzling-Rub-8550 Apr 21, 2026
Yes and also Canadian environmental laws and safety regulations will likely make it long and tedious to approve launch sites. Alberta will probably be ok with it though lol.
0
razordreamz Apr 21, 2026 +12
I approve launches from Alberta! First payload should be all the separatists!
12
DisastrousAcshin Apr 21, 2026 +7
Save money with the hot air assist
7
Overwatchingu Apr 21, 2026 -4
Oh those darn pesky environmental regulations not allowing us to pour mercury into ground water anymore, if only we could circumvent safety studies because it’s not like there would be any consequences if something went wrong with a rocket launch.
-4
wowthatsucked Apr 21, 2026 +1
There has to be some happy medium between “the river is so polluted it caught fire” and “the project to write an environmental impact report for high speed rail can now legally drink”.
1
two_to_toot Apr 21, 2026 -1
It's for satellites. It's not that difficult, even North Korea has done it.
-1
Weak_Syllabub_7994 Apr 21, 2026 +4
Which parts of Canada are closer to the equator than any part of North Korea? Also, North Korea has launched three total satellites in their whole history.
4
Trick_Math42069 Apr 21, 2026 +5
North Korea is only like 2 degrees closer to the equator
5
Weak_Syllabub_7994 Apr 21, 2026 -10
Well shit. Maybe Canada is destined to become a great space power like North Korea. Maybe you'll even surpass them and launch a *fourth* satellite into orbit one day? Or is that unrealistically ambitious?
-10
Trick_Math42069 Apr 21, 2026 +14
Canada already has a huge space in industry, just not launch sites
14
VivaLirica Apr 21, 2026 +7
I guess you don't know enough about space to understand that Canada already has a major space industry and is the largest foreign partner in NASA.
7
two_to_toot Apr 21, 2026 +3
You seem to be trapped in your American thought bubble. The Apollo missions for example relied heavily on Canadian engineers. The lunar module’s landing gear was created by Héroux, the heat shield was development by engineer Bryan Erb, and Kennedy went to Ottawa to recruit the engineers from the Avrow-Arrow.
3
FingalForever Apr 21, 2026 +12
Welcome move
12
chief_blunt9 Apr 21, 2026 +7
Do they even have space launch startups?
7
Spotter01 Apr 21, 2026 +20
We do! 2 off top of my head is Nord Space and Maritime Launch Services!
20
chief_blunt9 Apr 21, 2026 +3
Have they launched anything?
3
Spotter01 Apr 21, 2026 +15
Yes! We had 1 launch thus far it was a simple proof of concept that it is indeed possible!
15
Liquado Apr 21, 2026 +5
Ease off the exclamations there, sparky. Just kidding, I love space stuff too!
5
HouseofMarg Apr 21, 2026 +5
Yes, mostly [sub-orbit](https://www.maritimelaunch.com/news/maritime-launch-completes-second-successful-suborbital-demonstration-spaceport-nova-scotia). One of those was in partnership with The Netherlands. At least two major lower-earth orbit (LEO) launch projects are scheduled for June of this year and next year
5
pasatroj Apr 21, 2026 +6
I know certain launch points have advantages at certain times during rotation etc. but would launching closer to the Pole have an advantage?
6
BritishBenzene Apr 21, 2026 +7
Iirc- Low earth orbits (below the Van Allen belt, above the atmosphere) are fine for launch from higher latitudes. It wouldn’t work for most of the higher-flying satellites in geosynchronous orbit as the plane change from the higher latitudes to the equator would be prohibitively expensive in terms of fuel. Like it’d literally be cheaper to just launch a different one from closer to the equator. They could probably also do polar orbits, but idk much about where those are used as most of my knowledge comes from a combination of amateur space geekery and hard sci-fi novels.
7
Weak_Syllabub_7994 Apr 21, 2026 +6
>Iirc- Low earth orbits (below the Van Allen belt, above the atmosphere) are fine for launch from higher latitudes. Just a note, this is only for polar and sun-synchronous (near polar) low earth orbits. Non-polar low earth orbit (which is most LEO satellites) very much *do* benefit from being closer to the equator.
6
BritishBenzene Apr 21, 2026 +1
Good to know. I love space but spent my career in biotech instead, so I’m still learning.
1
pasatroj Apr 21, 2026 +2
I love U guys. Have a question about a specific Space thing? Minutes later Multiple answers with context. Thank You.
2
CanadaMapleMoose Apr 21, 2026 +6
For Polar/Northern Orbits yes, it's the only thing that makes sense as well for Canada, satellites etc to monitor the north which Canada needs.
6
pasatroj Apr 21, 2026 +1
Cool, all of this is fascinating. I grew up next to JPL and was always learning something new. A lot of neighbors in the 80's worked there.
1
riko77can Apr 21, 2026 +2
Suitable for polar, sun-synchronous, and high inclination orbits which have many applications. Just not practical for geostationary or equatorial orbits.
2
obliviousjd Apr 21, 2026 +2
Generally you want to be as close to the equator as possible. There's a reason the US launches from Florida, Texas, and Southern California. Russia does most their launches in another country at a site in southern Kazakhstan. While Europe does most their launches on another continent halfway around the world in French Guiana. Canada is honestly not the best place to launch a rocket.
2
Yvaelle Apr 21, 2026 +6
Launching closer to the equator is always cheaper to get into orbit, but it's not necessarily better for all orbital paths - and the paths Canada is specifically interested in launching into are not the geosynchronous equatorial orbits - so it's actually a great launch spot for the niche Canada wants to build in polar and asynchronous orbits.
6
2peg2city Apr 21, 2026 +10
Just wait until we add our newest province, Belize
10
Xeiliex Apr 21, 2026 +1
I know your joking but we kinda already took over Belize in 40’s Something to do with American Jesuit priests and banks… You’re far too late…
1
pasatroj Apr 21, 2026 +1
The equator thing I knew,growing up next to JPL has it's advantages. I just wondered if their could a specific adv. in specific circumstances. I have thankfuly been schooled by multiple replies. In the best way. Like OG Listnook was.
1
CamusCrankyCamel Apr 21, 2026 +1
There’s also 4 pads at Wallops in Virginia
1
Burgoonius Apr 22, 2026 +2
That’s awesome
2
Sweet_taco28 Apr 22, 2026 +2
But the best commercial space launch company is American.
2
ChatamKay Apr 21, 2026 +3
Everyday they announce a new f*** you to the USA. We’re (Canadians) all for it.
3
125capybaras Apr 22, 2026 +7
Lmao. When you guys can build something that gets to the Moon, we'll respect you a bit more. Until then, we'll keep an extra seat warm on our rockets for you
7
ChatamKay Apr 22, 2026 -2
Sure thing.. you brainwashed zero.
-2
Plenty_Beautiful_547 Apr 21, 2026 +1
No one can rely on the US. Canada is no exception.
1
HalfOffSnoke Apr 21, 2026 +1
The ticker symbol is $MAXQ. Buy it now while its still under $1.
1
GuaSukaStarfruit Apr 22, 2026 +2
The market cap is already 500million with 0 revenues lmao
2
HalfOffSnoke Apr 22, 2026 +1
Yrs thats the whole story. Nice research.
1
magwai9 Apr 22, 2026 +1
[Nova Scotia's new space launch pad is a beaut!](https://youtu.be/1rIJA720sc4?si=E32thBQE5LVedV3m)
1
Overall-Phone7605 Apr 22, 2026 +2
No no yeah!
2
rudolf_waldheim Apr 22, 2026 +1
From where? Does Canada have colonies near the equator?
1
pishposhpoppycock Apr 21, 2026 +5
Trudeau's astronaut girlfriend must be so excited!
5
teddykaygeebee Apr 21, 2026 +1
And this is what happens when you go against allied nations instead of working together. Nice job, Donnie and co.
1
Astrid_Nebula Apr 21, 2026 +1
FRIENDLY COMPETITION! LFG! Hey CA, Well see your asses on Mars 😀
1
Weird_Pomegranate908 Apr 22, 2026 -1
The first step for a nuclear Canada.
-1
Beautiful-Lynx-2825 Apr 21, 2026 -4
Hahahaha, those silly snow Mexicans
-4
Perfect_Opposite2113 Apr 22, 2026
I hear mumbling coming from the basement. Is that you United States?
0
roller_coaster325 Apr 22, 2026
Makes sense except launching from Canada isn’t ideal. Could share a spaceport with France though.
0
Miss_L_Worldwide Apr 22, 2026 -5
LOL oh canada. There's a reason spaceports are in Texas and florida.
-5
Perfect_Opposite2113 Apr 22, 2026
Is it the hurricanes?
0
Miss_L_Worldwide Apr 22, 2026 +2
uh, no. It's to leverage the maximum rotational speed of the earth.
2
SlumdogSkillionaire Apr 21, 2026 -3
Sp-EH-ce
-3
delicioustreeblood Apr 21, 2026 -1
Didn't know you could use maple syrup for fuel but I'm here for it
-1
125capybaras Apr 22, 2026 -7
You're welcome for helping you grow some balls, Canada. Let us know when you make it to the Moon and can stop taking up seats on our spaceships. Sincerely, US Republicans 
-7
Perfect_Opposite2113 Apr 22, 2026 +4
Your country is a sinking ship thanks to republicans. See ya, wouldn’t want to be ya.
4
Kooky-Solution-4840 Apr 21, 2026 -21
Wasting money while children are starving is not  very Canadien.
-21
faultysynapse Apr 21, 2026 +6
Explain.
6
Kooky-Solution-4840 Apr 21, 2026 -17
There are 2000 children a day dying of starvation from genocide and we’re going to spend billions sending satellites into space for vanity projects?
-17
faultysynapse Apr 21, 2026 +11
And how are we going to fix that?
11
VivaLirica Apr 21, 2026 +10
Not in Canada there aren't.
10
← Back to Board