I suggest MDA. They own 10% of MLS and aren’t limited to just being a launch service.
10
PipnotiqApr 21, 2026
+6
This is only one word off from being my actual works name 😂
6
maxmurderApr 22, 2026
+8
Maritime Lunch Services
8
FakeRickHarrisonApr 22, 2026
+1
Loonie Toonie Space Agency
1
emezeekielApr 21, 2026
+19
We will be goooooing…. to polar orbits only.
Which would be OK for many national security launches but most of those require medium to heavy lift launch vehicles which currently only have pads at Vandenburg or Cape Canaveral.
So this will be limited to smallsats in polar (or sun synch) orbits, but it’s a start!
19
BrianWantsTruthApr 21, 2026
+11
I heard about this new space initiative today, and I thought “that’s great, but what kind of orbits can we even offer?”
11
Acceptable_Noise651Apr 22, 2026
+4
It’s good enough for Canada to have 100% launch control over their own satellites besides you guys have plenty of empty space to build a sweet launch site. Hopefully it works out well enough for Canada to eventually launch their own Astronauts into space. It would be pretty cool if the Artemis project started to have multiple countries for launches to scale things up quicker.
4
SixstringthingsApr 21, 2026
+51
This would be a good time to have a Caribbean province
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed\_Canadian\_political\_association\_with\_the\_Turks\_and\_Caicos\_Islands](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_Canadian_political_association_with_the_Turks_and_Caicos_Islands)
51
yellow_banditosApr 21, 2026
+35
Low lying , hurricane ally, everything would have to be shipped in.
Very not Ideal location.
35
Old_Caterpillar_5385Apr 21, 2026
+20
Carney should go to Cuba and strike the deal of a lifetime.
(And no I’m not serious, Cubans want a free Cuba, but just imagining the look on Trump’s face makes me laugh)
20
ErmahgerdYuzernameApr 21, 2026
+8
Not that I want us to take Cuba from the Cubans but I’d love a Canadian province which is a Caribbean destination.
8
manfr57Apr 21, 2026
+30
Si vous voulez, nous sommes prêts à vous prêter Kourou en Guyane pour vos vols spatiaux.
De la part d'un cousin français
30
Conscious_Spare247Apr 21, 2026
+18
We already have a commercial space launch complex on our eastern coast.
18
WABAJIMApr 21, 2026
+14
Yep but, near the equator it's less expensive to launch to space. Alors moi je dis qu'on ne devrait pas dire non trop rapidement.
14
Conscious_Spare247Apr 21, 2026
+7
So you don't want Canada doing space launches. You want France doing them for us? Might as well just keep using US launch capability at that point. the whole point is building our own complex to launch commercial rockets.
7
OpeningTechnical5884Apr 21, 2026
+2
Entirely depends on the orbit you're wanting. High inclination and polar orbits are more efficient from Canada than the equator.
2
VoltaeApr 21, 2026
+2
Cheaper and easier for equatorial/low inclination orbits, yes. For polar orbits, launching from Canada will be fine.
2
manfr57Apr 21, 2026
+1
Ok, je ne savais pas merci pour l'info quoi qu'il en soit vous êtes tjrs les bienvenus.
1
NOT_EVEN_THAT_GUYApr 21, 2026
+12
to the moon!
12
airship_of_arbitraryApr 21, 2026
+6
God bless Jeremy Hansen.
6
NOT_EVEN_THAT_GUYApr 22, 2026
+2
Moongod
2
slingbladdeApr 21, 2026
+6
More satellites for everyone..
6
grenamierApr 21, 2026
+3
Whatever happened to Spar Aerospace?
3
Canada1971Apr 21, 2026
+1
It was purchased by L3 Communications and largely went out of business although parts of it had previously become Ipart of what is now MDA Space.
1
YourOverlordsApr 21, 2026
+3
Black Brant is back baby!
3
Frankishe1Apr 22, 2026
+1
Time to scare the shit out of the Russians again :D
1
Necessary-Music-6685Apr 21, 2026
+32
Most space launches need to be from somewhere near to the equator to take advantage of the earth’s rotation to save fuel, so this seems mostly symbolic.
32
riko77canApr 21, 2026
+55
The Baikonur Cosmodrome (one of the busiest launch sites over the history of launches) is even further north than the proposed site in Nova Scotia. What you’re saying only applies if you are seeking an equatorial or geostationary orbit. Higher latitude sites are common for polar, sun-synchronous, or high-inclination orbits and certainly have their use. It’s *not* just symbolic.
55
JerbTrooneetApr 21, 2026
+11
For context the other Russian launch sites like Plesetsk and Vostochny are even further north than Baikonur and see frequent launches for satellites. Most of Canada would likely fall under similar latitudes to those sites so it's not unheard of to have far north rocket launch sites.
11
DaveidLApr 21, 2026
+7
This guy geographies.
7
-ram_the_manparts-Apr 21, 2026
+6
And knows his rocket appliances.
6
Emergency-Hat-8715Apr 22, 2026
+3
But apparently only has a rudimentary understanding of rocket launch sites.
Launching from florida only gives an extra 80 m/s in free Delta from the earth's rotation. Less than 1% of a benefit to launch from Florida instead of Nova Scotia, big benefits in being outside of hurricanes and small outlying islands.
It's different if you want to plane change to orbiting the equator. But why would Canada need that? Most domestic satellites would serve Canada and the European market. And if that's really important to you, use 2.7% of your mass budget, and run the ion thrusters intead of rocket fuel for a slow transition to equatorial geo over a reasonable timeframe.
There's reason Russia China and Europe are more than comfortable launching spacecraft and nobody is beating down south america's doors for a percent or two gain in launch efficiency, and even then only when they absolutely need to launch the largest possible thing into equatorial geostationary orbit
3
binzomaApr 21, 2026
+7
? new zealand has a commercial space launch programme. and nz is roughly the equiv latitude as canada
also most of europe is north of the southern end of canada (where most people live), and lots of european countries launch satelites
7
Weak_Syllabub_7994Apr 21, 2026
+11
Just to give people an idea of how much better it is to launch near the equator. It's cheaper for France to build rockets in Europe and then sail them all the way to South America to launch instead of just launching from Europe.
11
riko77canApr 21, 2026
+6
That’s only true for geostationary satellites or equatorial orbits though. There are also plenty of satellite applications that don’t require that type of orbit and are suitable for northern latitude launches from sites such as Baikonur which has been one of the busiest launch sites historically.
6
JerbTrooneetApr 21, 2026
+8
Equatorial launch sites also make sense for launches that need as much delta-V as possible since the Oberth effect reduces the amount of delta-V needed. The lower amount of inclination change burns also helps.
It's why the James Webb Space Telescope launched from French Guiana since it needed as much delta-V it could to reach the Sun-Earth L2 Lagrange point.
Though yeah equatorial launches aren't really needed for most satellite applications these days since those usually stay in LEO.
8
gwelfguyApr 21, 2026
+21
Launches into geo-synchronous orbit, which is an equatorial orbit, benefit from being close to the equator. These days most launches are into low earth orbit, which are generally polar orbits. They do not benefit from being close to the equator. LEO launches may occur from Florida, California, French Guiana, etc. because they already have launch facilities.
21
Weak_Syllabub_7994Apr 21, 2026
+13
>These days most launches are into low earth orbit, which are generally polar orbits.
Where are you getting that from? Everything I've been able to find says that the vast majority of LEO satellites are *not* in polar orbits?
Edit: Also, LEO satellites in non-polar orbits benefit from being near the equator too.
13
Dazzling-Rub-8550Apr 21, 2026
Yes and also Canadian environmental laws and safety regulations will likely make it long and tedious to approve launch sites. Alberta will probably be ok with it though lol.
0
razordreamzApr 21, 2026
+12
I approve launches from Alberta! First payload should be all the separatists!
12
DisastrousAcshinApr 21, 2026
+7
Save money with the hot air assist
7
OverwatchinguApr 21, 2026
-4
Oh those darn pesky environmental regulations not allowing us to pour mercury into ground water anymore, if only we could circumvent safety studies because it’s not like there would be any consequences if something went wrong with a rocket launch.
-4
wowthatsuckedApr 21, 2026
+1
There has to be some happy medium between “the river is so polluted it caught fire” and “the project to write an environmental impact report for high speed rail can now legally drink”.
1
two_to_tootApr 21, 2026
-1
It's for satellites. It's not that difficult, even North Korea has done it.
-1
Weak_Syllabub_7994Apr 21, 2026
+4
Which parts of Canada are closer to the equator than any part of North Korea?
Also, North Korea has launched three total satellites in their whole history.
4
Trick_Math42069Apr 21, 2026
+5
North Korea is only like 2 degrees closer to the equator
5
Weak_Syllabub_7994Apr 21, 2026
-10
Well shit. Maybe Canada is destined to become a great space power like North Korea.
Maybe you'll even surpass them and launch a *fourth* satellite into orbit one day? Or is that unrealistically ambitious?
-10
Trick_Math42069Apr 21, 2026
+14
Canada already has a huge space in industry, just not launch sites
14
VivaLiricaApr 21, 2026
+7
I guess you don't know enough about space to understand that Canada already has a major space industry and is the largest foreign partner in NASA.
7
two_to_tootApr 21, 2026
+3
You seem to be trapped in your American thought bubble.
The Apollo missions for example relied heavily on Canadian engineers. The lunar module’s landing gear was created by Héroux, the heat shield was development by engineer Bryan Erb, and Kennedy went to Ottawa to recruit the engineers from the Avrow-Arrow.
3
FingalForeverApr 21, 2026
+12
Welcome move
12
chief_blunt9Apr 21, 2026
+7
Do they even have space launch startups?
7
Spotter01Apr 21, 2026
+20
We do! 2 off top of my head is Nord Space and Maritime Launch Services!
20
chief_blunt9Apr 21, 2026
+3
Have they launched anything?
3
Spotter01Apr 21, 2026
+15
Yes! We had 1 launch thus far it was a simple proof of concept that it is indeed possible!
15
LiquadoApr 21, 2026
+5
Ease off the exclamations there, sparky.
Just kidding, I love space stuff too!
5
HouseofMargApr 21, 2026
+5
Yes, mostly [sub-orbit](https://www.maritimelaunch.com/news/maritime-launch-completes-second-successful-suborbital-demonstration-spaceport-nova-scotia). One of those was in partnership with The Netherlands. At least two major lower-earth orbit (LEO) launch projects are scheduled for June of this year and next year
5
pasatrojApr 21, 2026
+6
I know certain launch points have advantages at certain times during rotation etc. but would launching closer to the Pole have an advantage?
6
BritishBenzeneApr 21, 2026
+7
Iirc- Low earth orbits (below the Van Allen belt, above the atmosphere) are fine for launch from higher latitudes. It wouldn’t work for most of the higher-flying satellites in geosynchronous orbit as the plane change from the higher latitudes to the equator would be prohibitively expensive in terms of fuel. Like it’d literally be cheaper to just launch a different one from closer to the equator. They could probably also do polar orbits, but idk much about where those are used as most of my knowledge comes from a combination of amateur space geekery and hard sci-fi novels.
7
Weak_Syllabub_7994Apr 21, 2026
+6
>Iirc- Low earth orbits (below the Van Allen belt, above the atmosphere) are fine for launch from higher latitudes.
Just a note, this is only for polar and sun-synchronous (near polar) low earth orbits.
Non-polar low earth orbit (which is most LEO satellites) very much *do* benefit from being closer to the equator.
6
BritishBenzeneApr 21, 2026
+1
Good to know. I love space but spent my career in biotech instead, so I’m still learning.
1
pasatrojApr 21, 2026
+2
I love U guys. Have a question about a specific Space thing? Minutes later Multiple answers with context. Thank You.
2
CanadaMapleMooseApr 21, 2026
+6
For Polar/Northern Orbits yes, it's the only thing that makes sense as well for Canada, satellites etc to monitor the north which Canada needs.
6
pasatrojApr 21, 2026
+1
Cool, all of this is fascinating. I grew up next to JPL and was always learning something new. A lot of neighbors in the 80's worked there.
1
riko77canApr 21, 2026
+2
Suitable for polar, sun-synchronous, and high inclination orbits which have many applications. Just not practical for geostationary or equatorial orbits.
2
obliviousjdApr 21, 2026
+2
Generally you want to be as close to the equator as possible. There's a reason the US launches from Florida, Texas, and Southern California. Russia does most their launches in another country at a site in southern Kazakhstan. While Europe does most their launches on another continent halfway around the world in French Guiana.
Canada is honestly not the best place to launch a rocket.
2
YvaelleApr 21, 2026
+6
Launching closer to the equator is always cheaper to get into orbit, but it's not necessarily better for all orbital paths - and the paths Canada is specifically interested in launching into are not the geosynchronous equatorial orbits - so it's actually a great launch spot for the niche Canada wants to build in polar and asynchronous orbits.
6
2peg2cityApr 21, 2026
+10
Just wait until we add our newest province, Belize
10
XeiliexApr 21, 2026
+1
I know your joking but we kinda already took over Belize in 40’s
Something to do with American Jesuit priests and banks…
You’re far too late…
1
pasatrojApr 21, 2026
+1
The equator thing I knew,growing up next to JPL has it's advantages. I just wondered if their could a specific adv. in specific circumstances. I have thankfuly been schooled by multiple replies. In the best way. Like OG Listnook was.
1
CamusCrankyCamelApr 21, 2026
+1
There’s also 4 pads at Wallops in Virginia
1
BurgooniusApr 22, 2026
+2
That’s awesome
2
Sweet_taco28Apr 22, 2026
+2
But the best commercial space launch company is American.
2
ChatamKayApr 21, 2026
+3
Everyday they announce a new f*** you to the USA. We’re (Canadians) all for it.
3
125capybarasApr 22, 2026
+7
Lmao. When you guys can build something that gets to the Moon, we'll respect you a bit more.
Until then, we'll keep an extra seat warm on our rockets for you
7
ChatamKayApr 22, 2026
-2
Sure thing.. you brainwashed zero.
-2
Plenty_Beautiful_547Apr 21, 2026
+1
No one can rely on the US. Canada is no exception.
1
HalfOffSnokeApr 21, 2026
+1
The ticker symbol is $MAXQ. Buy it now while its still under $1.
1
GuaSukaStarfruitApr 22, 2026
+2
The market cap is already 500million with 0 revenues lmao
2
HalfOffSnokeApr 22, 2026
+1
Yrs thats the whole story. Nice research.
1
magwai9Apr 22, 2026
+1
[Nova Scotia's new space launch pad is a beaut!](https://youtu.be/1rIJA720sc4?si=E32thBQE5LVedV3m)
1
Overall-Phone7605Apr 22, 2026
+2
No no yeah!
2
rudolf_waldheimApr 22, 2026
+1
From where? Does Canada have colonies near the equator?
1
pishposhpoppycockApr 21, 2026
+5
Trudeau's astronaut girlfriend must be so excited!
5
teddykaygeebeeApr 21, 2026
+1
And this is what happens when you go against allied nations instead of working together. Nice job, Donnie and co.
1
Astrid_NebulaApr 21, 2026
+1
FRIENDLY COMPETITION! LFG! Hey CA, Well see your asses on Mars 😀
1
Weird_Pomegranate908Apr 22, 2026
-1
The first step for a nuclear Canada.
-1
Beautiful-Lynx-2825Apr 21, 2026
-4
Hahahaha, those silly snow Mexicans
-4
Perfect_Opposite2113Apr 22, 2026
I hear mumbling coming from the basement. Is that you United States?
0
roller_coaster325Apr 22, 2026
Makes sense except launching from Canada isn’t ideal. Could share a spaceport with France though.
0
Miss_L_WorldwideApr 22, 2026
-5
LOL oh canada. There's a reason spaceports are in Texas and florida.
-5
Perfect_Opposite2113Apr 22, 2026
Is it the hurricanes?
0
Miss_L_WorldwideApr 22, 2026
+2
uh, no. It's to leverage the maximum rotational speed of the earth.
2
SlumdogSkillionaireApr 21, 2026
-3
Sp-EH-ce
-3
delicioustreebloodApr 21, 2026
-1
Didn't know you could use maple syrup for fuel but I'm here for it
-1
125capybarasApr 22, 2026
-7
You're welcome for helping you grow some balls, Canada.
Let us know when you make it to the Moon and can stop taking up seats on our spaceships.
Sincerely,
US Republicans
-7
Perfect_Opposite2113Apr 22, 2026
+4
Your country is a sinking ship thanks to republicans. See ya, wouldn’t want to be ya.
4
Kooky-Solution-4840Apr 21, 2026
-21
Wasting money while children are starving is not very Canadien.
-21
faultysynapseApr 21, 2026
+6
Explain.
6
Kooky-Solution-4840Apr 21, 2026
-17
There are 2000 children a day dying of starvation from genocide and we’re going to spend billions sending satellites into space for vanity projects?
105 Comments