ListNook

Artistic_Concern_33 Apr 27, 2026 +624

Who ever wrote that headline has no idea what a sovereign wealth fund is lol

624

WillSRobs Apr 27, 2026 +115

Willing to bet they do but realizing a lot of people don't realize the characteristics that would qualify one

115

dsswill Apr 28, 2026 +49

The specifically stated purpose is to help support domestic projects and national interest. It’s not like Norway or Saudi’s wealth funds meant for diversification in preparation for the end of their oil wealth. The two points in the title do indeed seem very closely linked and in turn I struggle to see how it’s clickbait or an uninformed writer given Canada’s current closeness and sometimes outright reliance on the US for capital investment.

49

rubywpnmaster Apr 28, 2026 +3

After reading a bit on the fund I fail to see how it’s not taking 18 billion dollars from the Canadian citizens and “investing” it into their elites. I’m sure all those startup mining conglomerates and tech companies will be the primary beneficiaries here. Lol

3

JohnnyOnslaught Apr 28, 2026 +1

I don't much like the direction of it, I feel like it doesn't do anything to address systemic issues in our current economy. But I'd still rather the money be going to "our" elites than America's elites.

1

sarges_12gauge Apr 27, 2026 +28

Headline writers are told to get clicks and not really bother with if you’re misrepresenting anything (and it works!)

28

PrincessNakeyDance Apr 28, 2026 +2

I think a lot of headline writers are AI

2

SlurmzMckinley Apr 28, 2026 -2

They’re told that? By who?

-2

Ok-Doubt-6324 Apr 28, 2026 +18

"Who ever wrote that headline has no idea what a sovereign wealth fund is lol". Can you explain to all of us what a sovereign wealth fund is... just so none of us miss your meaning. ?

18

Icy-Computer-Poop Apr 28, 2026 +1

People like that only mock, never help.

1

Serapth Apr 28, 2026 +39

American media simply can't conceive of the world not revolving around them... They better get f****** used to it, American exceptionalism is dead and the obscene amount of damage done to the US's standing in just one year is unbelievable.

39

sharp11flat13 Apr 28, 2026 +4

Thank you. These people don’t seem to understand that the plan is not to replace US involvement in our economy with a single initiative, but rather to chip away at it bit by bit until our reliance is minimal. The urgency is immediate, but the strategy is a long term shift away from a one-time friend and ally who has become an unreliable and mercurial business partner. Drip. Drip. Drip. And I for one trust that our Prime Minister, with his PhD in economics and his experience and connections from being the Governor of not one but two central banks, not to mention a very successful career in the business world, is the right person to shape our economic future for the good of all Canadians. 🇨🇦

4

Harbinger2001 Apr 28, 2026 +8

Too many people commenting here don’t realize that this is not a normal sovereign wealth fund. It’s more like a VC fund to encourage investment in Canada - thus reducing their dependence on US investors.

8

Addicted2Qtips Apr 28, 2026

Canada has been doing this for as long as I can remember though. The Business Development Bank, TPC, Working Ventures, all different sorts of VC funds companies to build and employee in Canada.

0

PuzzleheadedOven2165 Apr 28, 2026 +3

Thr Business development bank of Canada is a great institution. It's helped a lot of startups and small businesses get off the ground. My dad sold his business and retired successfully after 35 years... a business he started with a BDBC loan.

3

Thecobs Apr 28, 2026

Apparently Canadians dont either. Its supposed to be reinvesting surplus not going another 80 Billion into debt.

0

RetroSwamp Apr 27, 2026 -2

Ohh they're click baiting for sure.

-2

Flimsy-Ad2701 Apr 27, 2026

Just add distance economy from US to every headline.

0

Dirtsniffee Apr 28, 2026 -3

That's what the Canadian government is trying to call it lmao. Worst part is we're dumb enough to fall for it.

-3

fishtankm29 Apr 27, 2026 +181

How are those two things connected?

181

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +105

Canada is critically dependent on US capital markets for business investment and a lot of Canadian capital leaves for the US. This helps keep the equity in Canada and invested in Canada.

105

Worth-Ad-2795 Apr 27, 2026 +32

The fund is meant to DIVERSIFY away from the domestic economy so a domestic shock doesn’t just bring down the “savings account” as well.

32

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +41

Just read what they said the purpose of the fund is. It’s specifically to support projects that are in the national interest. It’s not a traditional sovereign wealth fund. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2026/04/canada-strong-fund.html

41

JMJimmy Apr 28, 2026 +5

So effectively government bonds repackaged as an ETF or mutual fund?

5

canadian1987 Apr 28, 2026 +5

yes its another infrastructure bank renamed.

5

Harbinger2001 Apr 28, 2026 +2

Only philosophically. The government is not issuing debt that you purchase.

2

Adept-Donut-4229 Apr 28, 2026 -5

Oh, it's like the Hudson's Bay Company, if all it dealt with is investment capital.

-5

Serapth Apr 28, 2026 +14

Honestly the closest way to think of it, so far as I can tell, is a hybrid of Canada Savings Bonds / War bonds. The devil will be in the details, but essentially it will enable citizens to invest in a fund that will invest in nation building projects and share in the proceeds. So instead of having say China or Saudi invest in developing a lithium mine in Northern Ontario, this fund could instead.

14

Wambo74 Apr 28, 2026 -6

US investors invest in the US. But Canadian investors invest in the US too. Sucks to be Canada. Wealth and talent are fleeing south where the opportunities are.

-6

Harbinger2001 Apr 28, 2026 +2

If by “opportunity” you mean “debt fueled madness”, then sure. What’s the US deficit at this year? The US economy is fake, through and through. You just create debt, hand it out to military and agriculture and pretend you have a functioning economy.

2

Letzer-Mensch-hunter Apr 28, 2026 -1

yeah bro they should print bonds and give it to the first nations instead. Canada stonk!

-1

InvictusShmictus Apr 27, 2026 +13

They're not. Just journalists stirring up nonsense because that's what they do. No one really knows how this "Sovereign Wealth Fund" is supposed to work since we all just heard about it this morning.

13

Suheil-got-your-back Apr 28, 2026 +4

Look, I will put sovereign wealth fund onto my fancy canvas, i will also put some us dependency pin somewhere else on the canvas, put some photos from trump admin, pull a fancy string between them. Now can you visualize that? Thats how they are connected. I wanted it so, that is how so. /s

4

kjbaran Apr 28, 2026 +2

Dark pool management

2

TPCC159 Apr 27, 2026 +17

They’re not. Just terrible outlets desperate to push their agenda

17

Major_Ad138 Apr 27, 2026 +4

Yikes.

4

Perfect_Opposite2113 Apr 28, 2026 +14

I’ve heard this talked about all day on local radio here in Edmonton Alberta and not once did they say it was to distance the Canadian economy from the U.S. He doesn’t say it in the video clip or any of the sound bytes I’ve heard today. While I’m sure it plays a part this mostly is about Canadians investing in making Canada stronger.

14

TheIronMatron Apr 28, 2026 +9

It’s an American news outlet. It’s hard to get their readers interested in something that isn’t related to them somehow.

9

CipherWeaver Apr 27, 2026 +69

Sovereign wealth fund, yes. To distance ourselves from the USA economy.... ???

69

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +37

Yes. Too much Canadian equity leaves for the US. And not enough US equity invests in Canada - other than to extract the value back to the US.

37

theLuminescentlion Apr 28, 2026 +8

Norway's sovereign wealth fund that everyone using as the model is highly exposed to U.S. equities. Nearly 40% of the fund in invested in American stocks. Part of the goal of the Norwegian fund is to shield the fund from local recessions so it can be used as a very powerful tool to spend their way out of future hard times. If you model a fund after that a significant portion of your equity is still going to the U.S. to push American companies.

8

Harbinger2001 Apr 28, 2026 +15

Canada’s fund is nothing like Norway’s. It serves different purpose - to draw foreign investment into Canada. Read the press release https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2026/04/canada-strong-fund.html

15

Northern_Ice_2501 Apr 28, 2026 +2

Thank you.

2

theLuminescentlion Apr 28, 2026 -1

I see that the target equities are different aiming at Canadian instead of foreign investments... I don't see where this draws foreign investment into Canada though. This would just be the Canadian government buying Canadian equities and not worrying about the conflict of interest. I'm very worried this is going to be a way for rich people to leave the government as the bag holder.

-1

Harbinger2001 Apr 28, 2026 +1

It’s not buying equities. It’s providing equity to projects and then pairing that with private investment. It will be used to lower the investment required to fund projects. Think of it as a VC fund.

1

theLuminescentlion Apr 28, 2026 -2

Providing equity would be a grant the article linked say their are taking equity in the companies they fund which means they are buying equities. Using it as a VC fund makes my fears even worse because anyone good enough to make money on those markets isn't going to be working for the government's fund. Government level bag holding for shitty startups doesn't help Canada even if those shitty start ups are Canadian. The government shouldn't be gambling on investments with taxpayer funds. Especially while the country has over a trillion dollars in debt.

-2

pyy4 Apr 28, 2026 +5

Right.... How would a man with a doctorate in economics with degrees from both harvard and oxford, who formerly served as the governor of both the bank of canada (through 2008 crisis) and bank of england (post brexit), as well as former chair at bloomberg LP and vice chair at Brookfield asset management possibly find someone or some people smart enough for the job???? Carney is fairly obviously the BEST person to establish a fund like this and have it be successful...

5

Harbinger2001 Apr 28, 2026 +1

This fund is addressing a specific weakness Canada has because of its close proximity to the US. We’ll learn the details later, but it is a very good move to keep equity and more importantly businesses in Canada.

1

Thecobs Apr 28, 2026 +1

Norways also is surplus money being reinvested, Canada is just 80 Billion in more debt.

1

Prestigious-Car-4877 Apr 27, 2026 +3

I kinda thought it might have something to do with Alberta getting uppity.

3

Perfect_Opposite2113 Apr 28, 2026 +3

I’ve been listening to talk radio all day today here in Edmonton Alberta and this article is the first time I’ve heard it mentioned that this is to distance us from the U.S. economy. Carney doesn’t even say it in the clip they chose. It’s worded like this to get people pissed off.

3

Fun-Astronomer5311 Apr 27, 2026 +27

Similar to Singapore's government investment body -- Temasek Holdings. Good idea.

27

Poyayan1 Apr 27, 2026 -6

Well, if the fund end up investing all in US companies, then what's the point? If you want to grow local companies, then do things that lead to that.

-6

Frigoffwidit Apr 27, 2026 +14

It cant invest in US companies. It's not a traditional sovereign wealth fund, its more like an infrastructure bank but instead of handing out loans it's buying equity in major projects in Canada. That will accelerate project development through providing government seed capital, but the government will hold equity in the projects that are expexted to deliver a return that will be reinvested in the fund. It will be open to Canadians, private investors and foreign equity to invest in.

14

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +3

That’s what it’s for. To ensure Canadian companies can funds outside of going to the US.

3

Thecobs Apr 28, 2026 -1

Except its going into 80 Billion in debt instead of reinvesting surplus money.

-1

DestructiveA Apr 27, 2026 -10

Lol it makes no sense for Canada to have a SWF, they could just directly put that money into the economy, instead of buying foreign PE assets and US equities. The countries with the largest SWFs include Singapore, Norway, UAE, Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia. I think that list speaks for itself.

-10

Yukas911 Apr 28, 2026 +2

You should have read the article.

2

FlipZip69 Apr 28, 2026 +2

Maybe read more than a headline. Every dollar has to stay in Canada and any moneys invested are directly invested in Canadian projects.

2

hackenclaw Apr 28, 2026 +5

I think 100% of all Canadian politician wages & their pensions should be base on this fund's annual profit & long term profit. That will align politician's interest to their people.

5

titanking4 Apr 28, 2026 +2

The reality is that members of political office anywhere MUST be compensated highly in order to attract the best talent among the masses. - And a political person in any form of financial distress let’s say by needing to support their family on 60K a year, is MUCH more venerable to bribery and corruption. Easy to say no to a 500K bribe when you have 3M in the bank instead of 20K in the bank. - Pay a person well, and the risk vs reward relationship goes out the window. That’s why government shutdowns in the USA don’t actually shut down compensation of lawmakers. Because the last thing you want is a bunch of highly wealthy politicians using their wealth as a weapon against other politicians and force shutdowns and financial distress. Politician compensation is a tiny fraction of government expenditures, and the rewards of “fairness” are dwarfed by the negatives of chasing off anyone smart or competent from seeking office when they can easily make more money in private sector.

2

Novel-Lifeguard6491 Apr 27, 2026 +14

The obvious question nobody in Ottawa seems to want to answer directly is where the $25 billion comes from. Sovereign wealth funds are typically built from budget surpluses, which is how Norway's fund became the largest in the world. Canada currently runs a **deficit**.

14

Another-attempt42 Apr 27, 2026 +23

Norway's was built on taxation on fossil fuel extraction. It would be great if Canada could do something similar.

23

airship_of_arbitrary Apr 28, 2026 +4

The problem is that the provinces own natural resource taxes, they're not federal.

4

lastSKPirate Apr 28, 2026 +2

The province's do own the resources and they do get all the royalties from extraction, but that's not the impediment you think it is. The federal government's taxation power is unlimited under section 91 of the constitution. If the federal government wants to tax something, it can. That's why all the carbon tax lawsuits were just pointless theatre on the part of the SK/AB governments.

2

Minttt Apr 27, 2026 +15

This has been asked by the media already, and for those curious, here is the government's response to where the $25 billion is coming from when the government has been in deficit for over a decade: "Carney said the Spring Economic Update on Tuesday will deliver news that Canada's finances are on stronger footing than they were when Carney's government projected a $78.3 billion deficit for the fiscal year that just ended." Take that for what you will.

15

MrKyleOwns Apr 27, 2026

Just got a headache reading that quote..

0

InvictusShmictus Apr 27, 2026 +3

Its not really a sovereign wealth fund. Its more like an infrastructure bond program, or something.

3

roscomikotrain Apr 28, 2026 +3

If we invest and get tax breaks similar to TFSA or FHSA I am all in-

3

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +6

This isn’t true at all. Sovereign funds are built from taxes. You should not mix investment with deficit reduction. Especially when most of our deficit is not structural.

6

lastSKPirate Apr 28, 2026 +1

You're not talking to someone interested in a good faith discussion, they're just mindlessly parroting whatever PP said on the subject.

1

DannyDOH Apr 28, 2026 +4

Iran War oil prices.

4

sex-emu Apr 28, 2026 +1

[Canada has the lowest debt to net gdp ratio in the G7](https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/GGXWDN_G01_GDP_PT@FM/CAN/FRA/DEU/GBR/USA/ITA/JPN). Carney's argument is there is room to spend as long as it's done intelligently. Trudeau got away with his reckless spending for 10 years while investment left. Carney is trying to fast track investment in the country any way he can.

1

Novus20 Apr 28, 2026

Know what would save us some money closing federal office buildings and selling that shit. We could save billions

0

slingbladde Apr 27, 2026 -8

So our PM has another gig as ceo/s of an investment fund...nothing new...the gains will trickle down to where now? Still have to clean up every corps hole dug in this country also..PM

-8

chesterforbes Apr 27, 2026 +14

I’ll be the first to say that I don’t understand shit about finances and economics but I’m down for anything that makes it possible to cut us off from the US permanently.

14

Thecobs Apr 28, 2026 +1

Should definitely learn a few things before you form an opinion. Another 80 Billion in debt doesnt help us.

1

Expert_Put_7492 Apr 28, 2026 +3

It's a shame the U.S. has lost a good trading partner. It didn't have to happen. We could have kept a synergy.

3

Foodconsumer89 Apr 28, 2026 +2

We should call it our TACO fund

2

Sneaky_SOB Apr 28, 2026 +2

I can't understand how Canada can create a sovereign wealth fund with no money. Norway did it with its surplus oil revenues. Canada has massive debt therefore no surplus money to invest. It doesn't even invest in its own natural resources, crazy as that is. They purchase LNG from Australia and oil from Saudi Arabia even though they have the third largest oil and gas reserves in the world.

2

Weak_Flamingo_3031 Apr 27, 2026 +3

So there just borrowing 25 billion to invest it? They still have to pay interest on that money?

3

Ecstatic-Island-9778 Apr 28, 2026 +2

We have the concept of a plan!

2

Character_Comfort440 Apr 27, 2026 +2

carney and the rest of them are finally waking up to how much we need our own piggy bank.

2

Worth-Ad-2795 Apr 27, 2026 +2

Sovereign wealth funds are meant to diversify away from the domestic economy as to not put too many eggs in one basket.

2

FlipZip69 Apr 28, 2026 +4

In no definition does a Sovereign wealth fund suggest money has to be diversified away from the domestic economy. Quite the opposite. Most Sovereign wealth funds are mandated to invest only in the domestic economy. As this is designed.

4

Thecobs Apr 28, 2026 -4

No, it is supposed to reinvest surplus money but what we get is another 80 Billion in debt because the Liberals

-4

Mac62961 Apr 28, 2026 +1

Derp. The commonwealth fund maybe

1

dudeatwork77 Apr 28, 2026 +2

“By investing in US stocks “

2

Comfortable-Face4593 Apr 28, 2026 +1

Ouch

1

thisisnahamed Apr 28, 2026 +1

I support this as a Canadian. But what has this got to do with the US.?

1

TauCabalander Apr 28, 2026 +2

It wasn't necessary until the U.S. administration changed so radically that 'Business as Usual' wasn't possible.

2

RobinsShaman Apr 28, 2026 -2

Funny how everyone's putting on their big boy pants all the sudden.

-2

[deleted] Apr 27, 2026 -5

[removed]

-5

SomeRandomGuy0321 Apr 28, 2026 -2

Hoping for the best since this is my country after all, but I have zero hope that this is anything but a scam.

-2

Huge_Wave_9169 Apr 27, 2026 -20

This is typical liberal policies. Carney will ask Canadians to invest in the fund and once you take back your money they will tax you to hell.

-20

Amori_A_Splooge Apr 27, 2026 -15

>Mr. Carney linked its creation to his plans for major infrastructure projects like pipelines, ports, new nuclear generation and a high-speed passenger rail line. They are intended to bolster the economy in the face of President Trump’s trade war with Canada. >“For the first time in the history of Canada,” Mr. Carney said, “Canadians will not just contribute to the realization of these projects, they will benefit directly from their return.” I don't understand, does the Canadian government not already invest in infrastructure projects and have Canadians not already seen the benefiting of such projects? Oh so it's just more of the same..... >Mr. Carney made his announcement standing between two steam locomotives on display at a science and technology museum in Ottawa. He used them to evoke the history of the Canadian Pacific Railway, the first transportation link to unite Canada, which involved both private and public finance. In the 1870s, the government provided the railway’s promoters with over 25 million Canadian dollars, 25 million acres of land and generous tax exemptions. >“Facing at that time an economic depression and threats to our sovereignty from our southern neighbor, Canadians chose to build,” Mr. Carney said. “And the Canadian Pacific Railway became the connective tissue of a new country.” >After a reporter reminded the prime minister that the awarding of the railway contract also led to a political scandal, Mr. Carney said that the government would do things differently today. >“We have this same reliance on private enterprise to build and run these businesses,” he said. “But at the same time, we’ve also learned from our past.”

-15

madlovin_slowjams Apr 27, 2026 +9

What are you talking about more of the same? Carney mentioned the major projects which are being undertaken by private investment, not in any way owned by Canada. The sovereign wealth fund is going to be a crown corp that directs it's investment funds. Also, Canadians will have the option to invest personally. Really don't understand what you're on about, taking a random bunch of quotes and excluding all kinds of information. This is good news.

9

Amori_A_Splooge Apr 27, 2026 -6

>He said that its investments would be made in conjunction with private sector investors and other funds. So it's a blend of public and private dollars. How is this different than his example of the railroad from 1870?

-6

madlovin_slowjams Apr 27, 2026 +6

I think you should just listen to Carney's press conference. Pretty simple answer is it's not 1870... I don't really get what you're arguing? The crown corp can invest in private projects...

6

Amori_A_Splooge Apr 27, 2026 -4

>While Mr. Carney said that the fund would focus on investing in Canada, he offered no specifics. Doesn't sound like listening to the press conference would yield any additional information. Either way I'm going off the article that was posted. He literally said the fund would mix private and public funds that would invest in major infrastructure projects and Canadians would benefit from these projects for the first time.... Then he pointed to the example of the railroad built in 1870 which was built using private and public funds to benefit Canadians. How is this some new concept? Had the Canadian government never funded ports, railways, energy projects previously? Those were the only other types of projects listed. I get that setting aside the $25 billion into an investment account is new, but the idea to use of public and private dollars to finance projects in Canada does not appear to be a new concept.

-4

madlovin_slowjams Apr 27, 2026 +2

I say this not to be rude, but honestly, have AI explain it to you. You'll get a better response than I can give anyways. Compare it to the historical CPR deal of 1870 and how the Canadian Pension Plan is managed. It's a "new concept" in the sense that Canada doesn't have this. It has been done elsewhere.

2

Amori_A_Splooge Apr 27, 2026 +1

What is ai going to explain if there are no details available from the Canadian government? He made an annoucment and dumb comments that are idiotic at face value: >“For the first time in the history of Canada,” Mr. Carney said, “Canadians will not just contribute to the realization of these projects, they will benefit directly from their return.” This is statement is simply not true. Canadians have provided public funds for projects before and the Canadian people have received benefits from them. Underpinning my point is his own example of the railroad. He's making an announcement and acting like this is the first time Canadians are investing in infrastructure projects to their own benefit.

1

LEAP-er Apr 28, 2026 -5

The only province that can provide net-input to that SWF is AB. Feds will just use it to continue to appease Ontario and Quebec. Canada system is dysfunctional

-5

titanking4 Apr 28, 2026 +3

Alberta as a province is projecting a 9.4B deficit, wtf are you talking about? These “net-inputs” are federal taxes. Of which both only depend on the incomes of people living there. A person living in Alberta making 100K pays no more or less into the federal system than a person living in Ontario’s making 100K This “Alberta is getting financially stolen from” rhetoric is complete BS pushed by albertan politicians in order to secure the votes.

3

Standing_At_The_Edge Apr 27, 2026 -10

LOL, Google Crocus Fund in Manitoba just a national version of that. They say it will be protected - yah with our taxes….

-10

BagFriesAreFries Apr 27, 2026 -6

The question is: how do countries with sovereign wealth funds avoid them becoming soft power manipulation?

-6

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +2

They operate at arms length. Most developed countries have a long tradition of operating arms length state corporations. Canada even has two of the largest pension investment funds in the world - the CPP and the OTPP. There are a few “developed” countries that are too politically corrupt to manage this. I’ll let you guess who I’m referring to.

2

samsun387 Apr 27, 2026 +1

Who else, aside from our obvious neighbour

1

Harbinger2001 Apr 27, 2026 +3

You guessed right. They have normalized corruption under the guise of letting democratically elected politicians have supremacy over the government.

3

Xelvorian Apr 27, 2026 -17

Because nothing says independence like copying Norways homework

-17

Xelvorian Apr 27, 2026 -16

good luck diversifying away from that 75% export reliance on us

-16

Novus20 Apr 28, 2026 +5

K….you do know that’s going into america as you’re buying out stuff…..

5

roscomikotrain Apr 28, 2026 +2

Ok.

2

Limnuge Apr 28, 2026 -16

Sovereign wealth funds normally need wealth to work and Canada has none

-16

[deleted] Apr 28, 2026 +1

[removed]

1

BasicTelephonic Apr 28, 2026 +3

Actually you’re probably from Florida.

3

[deleted] Apr 27, 2026 -7

[removed]

-7

Acrobatic_Fig2657 Apr 27, 2026 +5

They haven't given any info because it would pre-empt the spring financial update happening tomorrow morning. Take your tinfoil hat off, bro.

5

Typingdude3 Apr 27, 2026 -4

Come back to this comment tomorrow after Carney supposedly reveals all. And after Canadas economy stops shrinking under his leadership. Carney's travel budget must be bigger than Taylor Swift on her last world tour. So far his results are negligible to put it politely.

-4

Happinessisawrmgun Apr 27, 2026 +5

How come its always people with shit takes that are chronically online and are too scared to stand behind their comment history? Its embarrassing

5

scotchtree Apr 27, 2026 +4

Holy hyperbole!

4

[deleted] Apr 28, 2026 -18

[deleted]

-18

DiscoLew Apr 28, 2026 +13

Your a****** president started this. F*** you guys for electing that piece of shit

13

rustyiron Apr 28, 2026 +8

Narrator: They might as well be a Trump supporter.

8

jijitalk Apr 28, 2026 +13

F*** us? F*** you, f*** your stupid ass pedo president who’s breaching trade deals that HE signed and f*** everyone of you who voted for him.

13

Novus20 Apr 28, 2026 +3

As a Canada I will not take anything you say seriously as you’re a KISS fan…..get some taste mate

3

Canada Setting Up Sovereign Wealth Fund to Distance Economy From U.S.

💬 Send a Message

126 Comments