tfw you're so bad even an anti vax pro freedom convoy MP is tired of you
62
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+22
Meanwhile the conservative party just passed his leadership review again earlier this year, trying to stick their heads in the sand and acting as if nothing bad has happened 😂😂
22
Big_Albatross_30501 day ago
+14
The problem with the leadership review is that it was done in Alberta at a time when they knew Ontario conservatives would be too busy to attend and unable to cast their votes.
14
xmaspruden1 day ago
+13
It seems like they stacked that room full of supporters on purpose, for whatever short term gain that got them. I for one am glad to see this idiot in such shambles.
13
Mas_Cervezas1 day ago
+8
The convention was held in Alberta but it wasn’t open to the regular membership, only invited members who also had to pay $1000 for the privilege of voting. It was a f****** sham.
8
Wolfreak761 day ago
+3
Even Conservatives weren't interested in paying $1000 to save their party. Maybe they can merge with the NDP.
3
Big_Albatross_30501 day ago
+3
yeah pretty much
3
La_Ferrassie1 day ago
+9
It was a sham. I think it was 2500 people -ish total, and he won with 87%.
According to Wikipedia, 678,708 members in the CPC.
To attend, it was $1000 and pay your own travel costs.
9
NotEnoughIsTooMuch1 day ago
+2
That is a recipe for dissent (serves approx. 676k).
2
Somecommentator80082 days ago
+243
So easy for the Cons too, just get a moderate leader that is more likable and they'll suck up votes like crazy.
243
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+275
Conservatives all seem to be going way too far right everywhere, that's why the old school Conservative leading the liberals got the vote
275
Somecommentator80082 days ago
+93
Cons in Canada will never get a majority going that far right. Canada for the most of its history is either left or centre. Going far right is completely out of the question I think for most Canadians. Old school Cons might just continue voting Liberal if the Cons just try nothing and are out of ideas.
93
Cosmosass2 days ago
+92
Our Canadian Liberal Party is honestly quite conservative anyway, especially under Carney. Perfectly placed to not only draw Conservative MPs across the line, but bring in Conservative voters who may dislike PP.
Liberals and Conservatives can fight all they want, but I'm just glad NDP voted Avi Lewis as leader. Hopefully we get an actual left wing party in Canada now.
92
Somecommentator80082 days ago
+55
I do think Avi Lewis can do really well if he stays away from identity politics and focuses on the NDP's roots. Back to supporting workers, lower class, unions, social services (healthcare, education, etc).
55
ForgetMeNotSummer2 days ago
+46
The NDP convention just went viral for embarrassing identity politics. Check out the clips on YouTube. I miss Jack Layton. He truly encompassed working class values.
46
airship_of_arbitrary2 days ago
+7
Billionaires are the minority ruining all of our lives. Trans folks don't come close.
Saying that out loud isn't really identity politics, it's just the truth.
7
ForgetMeNotSummer1 day ago
+2
What are you talking about? Did you intend to respond to me?
2
Sonicmaster293-Azure1 day ago
+2
Thank you for the support btw. Why do some people hate us for something out of our control, does anyone really think I *like* being trans in today's political climate!? It's like being gay in the 80s and 90s! I just want to live as myself...
But I agree with u/Somecommentator8008's statement for the most part. They need to focus on everything there, but who's to say that they can't support LGB**T** people and other minorities as well? We're all of the working class, even if some of you here don't like us for whatever reason...
2
TaurusRuber2 days ago
+21
NDP leaders and not doing identity politics? I enjoy your optimism, I do wish they would stop with it.
21
Cosmosass2 days ago
+13
I completely agree. Thankfully Avi seems to champion all of those things you mentioned. Identity politics has harmed left wing movements all over the world, largely I think because the right wing media networks have latched onto it and blown it severely out of proportion - but still, it's definitely time to move toward a worker class party focusing on things that actually matter.
13
BeautifulLaw2 days ago
+10
It’s also just that the nature of identity politics is inherently divisive since it requires acknowledging and placing certain groups of people ahead of others. Which can be fine so long as you do not let the groups get super specific or individualistic, which we saw happen at the NDP convention recently. It just seems to get out of hand and leads to weird infighting, woke scolding, and purity testing.
10
Brendan112042 days ago
+11
I saw people waving a Palestinian flag right on the stage next to Avi Lewis after he won. No thanks.
11
airship_of_arbitrary2 days ago
+8
Israel literally just bombed a bunch of hospitals today. We still acting like saying to stop killing kids is a bad thing?
8
Gullible_Zucchini1321 day ago
+6
Canadian opposition parties should probably not be too focussed on what’s happening in the Middle East.
I know that’s not what people want to hear, but it is very divisive. Someone up above said it best. NDP need to focus on being champions of the working class in Canada. We’ve already seen what happens to the NDP when they lose focus.
6
bilyl2 days ago
+4
Let’s be fair here: the Liberal Party’s platform is essentially whatever the PM’s/party elite’s position is. The platform has changed substantially between different leaders.
4
Cosmosass1 day ago
+2
That's true. It's kind of crazy how many variations of "Liberal Party" we can get in Canada. Not really sure what that word means other than, as you say, whatever the current leadership circle mandates
2
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+3
My only concern is that Avi is way too far left, which is just as bad as too far right
3
Spider-man20982 days ago
+5
Is it? Wild take. Avi Lewis was pushing the Leap Manifesto almost a decade ago, while far right are pushing actual fascism. Far left and far right are nowhere near comparable, and the fact that you seem to think they are is… well, I find it a little surprising.
5
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+6
Here's how I see it, any extreme usually doesn't work. When you're at an extreme, you really present the view of a minority of people in general and it just alienates most people. A more centrist, little left here, little right there will appeal to the most people overall. No one gets everything they want, but you get something that directly benefits most people. I'm not saying left and right can be compared, more like just saying they're both extremes
6
HotHits6302 days ago
+4
Harper won, because he played center right, but then got goofy and went too far right by the end. And his party paid the price.
4
SillyGoatGruff2 days ago
+6
Harper helped put orban and trump into power. "Got Goofy" is certainly one way to put it lol
6
MarthePryde2 days ago
+5
Especially now that there is a very stark reminder of what fascism looks like
5
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+24
That's exactly it. I'm old school Conservative, and didn't at all like the direction the CPC and my provincial UCP parties were going. Too many Bibles, too much negativity, too close to American and too far right. The liberals under Carney are a great compromise. No party will ever give you 100% of what you want, but generally, a party can give you most of what you want and not destroy the place in the process. The US showed us what too far right does and the UCP is following on their heels, I couldn't stomach seeing the federal government do it under the CPC
24
ImaginationSea27672 days ago
+18
Pierre lost his communications director today as well before all this happened. So I think many are not liking it in the CPC camp.
I remember there being many MPs that went to poltical talk shows and news agencies said in secret that they were unhappy and wanted Pierre to change course.
They wanted him to change and he did not.
A former prime minister of Canada told Pierre to change. He told Pierre you cant get support in Canada going to the populist far right. He also obviously didnt listen to him.
“Look, you can't get elected with that kind of stuff,” Mulroney said. “Canadians are not there. Canadians are in the broad, general centre.”
“I did say to him — which is pretty obvious — you cannot, in this country, get elected from the extreme left or the extreme right. It can't happen. We have 155 years of history to prove it,” he added.
18
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+7
Yup, just proves more and more that Canada isn't like the States, we don't want their right wing c*** here
7
cleofisrandolph12 days ago
+3
I mean…looking at Alberta and parts of BC, you can certainly make a case that far right politics plays.
Vancouver-Quilchena is currently represented by Dallas Brodie provincially, who was considered too extreme for the conservatives and tried to repeal the Human Rights Code.
3
thealkaizer2 days ago
+7
I'd consider myself a centrist, slightly leaning left. And I've always said that I could see myself voting for a moderate conservative or conservative-progressive party/leader. But the current state of the conservative party is just not my flavor of conservatism.
7
CBowdidge2 days ago
+3
I'm the same. I said back before Trudeau resigned that if we're going to get a Conservative government, couldn't it be the old Progressive Conservatives, since they're moderate and reasonable. And yes, you could say that's what we have. I think many Canadians feel the same.
3
Key-Rough-83462 days ago
+4
And it’s funny that these far right conservatives consider the moderates to be far left.
4
two_to_toot2 days ago
+2
But the odd thing is that this lady is a social conservative by Canadian standards.
2
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+2
All of this just screams desperation from all these conservatives in different countries trying to cling onto whatever flavor of "maga" in their country and just reeks of lack of imagination on how to actually properly reinvent themselves following the disastrous 2nd Trump term.
2
Marsupialmania2 days ago
+2
Ya that’s the crazy part. The guys horny for pollievre are mostly repulsive racist homophobic bigots. I don’t think pollievre is necessarily that or would govern like that but he would be forced to answer to that base. In another world health crisis Hed be forced to answer to that base. In another American war escalation Hed be forced to answer to that base. For these reasons I can’t see any path to him forming government.
2
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+5
That's exactly my take as well. We see that behavior in Alberta with the UCP. Their base is the redneck, oilfield trash, super Christian, racist and bigoted Albertans and the UCP bends over for them and they have a way of being able to justify everything that is a net negative to 90% of us
5
Visual_Fun_20141 day ago
+1
Got any examples of going too far right?
1
Sanhen2 days ago
+23
I can't believe the Conservative voters saw Poilievre blow a historic lead in the last election, while even losing his own seat, and then say, "Nah, let's run this back." Even if they like his politics, surely there was another like-minded option out there who didn't also have the baggage of such a monumental defeat.
23
Capable_Kiwi25142 days ago
+7
Their Leadership review had capped participation and cost $1000 to attend, so... it was pretty stage managed.
7
3000doorsofportugal2 days ago
+4
Also it was in person voting only.... in Calgary.
4
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+3
It's also funny that Poilievre of all people was the dude the conservative party chose to stick with again after losing an election (in spectacular fashion too) when they didn't do the same with Scheer or O'Toole following their losses in the elections in 2019 and 2021, immediately dropping them. Especially O'Toole who iirc was considered a pretty moderate conservative and probably would've done well (at least much better than Poilievre) last election of they kept him on, as long as he positioned himself against Trump instead of cozying up with him and that brand of politics.
3
No_Lemon_32902 days ago
+15
So easy for them, but they are doubling down on these far right leaders and it's biting them in the ass. Hell this latest floor crosser is a anti vaxxer and she's like nah I don't want to be conservative anymore.
15
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+4
That's the thing, is if anti vax doesn't want to stay at the party, what the hell else are they doing?
4
Double_Surround61401 day ago
+2
As someone from her riding. She is more than an anti-vaxxer. She is also a goofy religious nut who has voted to keep conversion therapy legal and has been pro-Donald Trump for the last 10 years. My Mom texted me about this yesterday and I thought she was falling for an April fools joke a little late.
Honestly, I'm disappointed that the Liberals would have accepted her crossing the floor. Any common sense Liberal should be upset by this.
2
rudown2brown2 days ago
+15
This. Carney is a blue grit liberal. He would be am amazing conservative leader and would have a majority govt with them too I bet.
15
Protean_Protein2 days ago
+7
They could’ve got Carney and crushed the Liberals.
7
XyzzyPop2 days ago
+2
Are we talking about wrestling, or good government? It's not a f****** game.
2
Sayhei2mylittlefrnd2 days ago
+3
I don’t think so at this point as Carney could have lead the Conservative Party. Conservatives are cooked like the liberals were after Paul Martin
3
metallicadefender2 days ago
+2
Call them Tories instead of Cons. Dont americanize it. Thats what the Tories would want.
2
manefa2 days ago
+5
Not Canadian, but it seems like Carney has provided the breath of fresh air the liberals needed ? Went from just scraping in to being pretty popular?
5
Marijuana_Miler2 days ago
+18
It’s more complicated. Trudeau got elected in 2013 based on a platform of expanding government services and spending more after years of government austerity under the CPC Harper government following the 2008 financial crisis.
As with any leader Trudeau started to become more unpopular. The CPC would have probably won in 2021, but they lost enough votes to a further right party (the PPC) that the Liberals were able to follow a coalition majority government with the NDP. During this time the CPC elected Polievre as their leader, and he went all in on the culture war and being anti-Trudeau. There were a lot of slogans. It worked to keep the PPC from siphoning off their votes. However, following Trump’s election and subsequent tariff/talk of taking Canada and voters seeing Polievre as being too cozy with Americans Carney was able to gain a minority government and Polievre lost his own parliamentary seat. Since then Carney has done a great job on the global stage and has bern gaining in popularity at the expense of the CPC.
It’s not just that Carney is a breath of fresh air, but that Polievre has shown himself to be an empty vessel. He was re-elected as leader of the party, but IMO he was really the only option. The CPC are now stuck in a tough place as the Liberals are taking their voters that held their nose for the social policies while voting based on the economy platform. If they elect a moderate leader like they had before with Andrew Scheer (Conservative leader during 2021) the maple MAGA people will move back to the PPC; effectively fracturing the Conservative Party and reverting them back to being two fractured parties of social conservatives and fiscal conservatives. However, Polievre is also apparently a complete a****** and pushing away his own party members; who have been jumping over to the Liberals. Carney will gain a majority government within the next week after the 3 by-elections and I expect we will see a fracturing of the CPC as the Liberals no longer need new parliamentary mebers but people want to get away from Polievre’s leadership.
18
thetermguy2 days ago
+12
He's not a typical bleeding heart liberal. He's really a posterchild for what Canadian conservatives are supposed to be.
Or as I like to say, I want a conservative prime minister even if I have to vote liberal to get it.
Plus, the conservatives aren't going right, they're going socon. And a lot of Canadians who lean conservative are not socons.
12
Independent_Zone_2342 days ago
+12
Yes, very much so. While the Trump factor did have a colossal impact on Carney being elected, and he would not have been elected without Mango Man, I think Carney would have been elected eventually. He is very much what the average Canadian prefers in a politician - pragmatic, socially progressive, and, time will tell for sure, fiscally conservative. We like our politicians to stay out of the spotlight and get to work.
12
TropicalPrairie2 days ago
+3
I am Canadian. I voted for Trudeau back in the day but soon realized it was all gloss. I do like Carney so far. I feel he is making hard but needed decisions and genuinely looking to build Canada for the future.
3
ConsequenceLow96882 days ago
+5
That's exactly it. The previous leader, Justin Trudeau wasn't a great leader, so they learned from their mistakes. The CPC didn't learn anything
5
Ecsta2 days ago
+2
Carney is a moderate and would probably be considered a conservative before the party imploded and decided to appeal to the crazies.
2
unidentifiable2 days ago
+1
Since the Reform merger, so much of the voting base for the UCP is way right though, I don't think they can get away from it.
The PCs and the Reform merger was IMO the worst thing to happen for the political right in Canada. Kim Campbell put a bullet in the head of the PCs, and it took until Harper to undo the damage, and frankly Harper's win was less to do with the Conservatives and more largely because of Layton and how strong the NDP were, effectively fracturing the left.
We need the PCs back, but there's very little hope for it.
1
cre8ivjay2 days ago
+1
I've been saying this for years but conservatives don't seem to like that idea (O'Toole anyone??).
It's really hard to to interpret this as anything other then Conservatives wanting to be even more conservative which hasn't been working out great.
1
Jinfoo2 days ago
+1
Tough to win the business minded vote when your opponent went to Harvard then Oxford Harvard; worked at Goldman, Bank of Canada, Bank of UK, then Brookfield.
The Liberal leadership pick basically sunk PP when it looked like he may win. Hopefully we won’t see any more leaders like Justin Trudeau out of the Liberals.
1
BigGwep1 day ago
+1
Meh I’d vote ppc if they got rid of Pierre, last thing I want is a more liberal conservative
1
Harold34561 day ago
+1
Carney is almost right wing economically, despite being at least nominally socially progressive. I feel like the conservatives are in an awkward position in that if they go closer to the center, keeping moderately right on economy and immigration while taking a more socially progressive stance, there will be very little to separate them from Liberals aside from a legacy of conspiracy theories and culture war nonsense. O’Toole tried and got crushed. So now they’re just all-in on the far right populist stuff.
1
Hot-Tap73461 day ago
+1
Oh yeah that worked so great with Otoole and Scheer. Polievre was the best shot to take down Trudeau. Would make a great PM likely. But Carney seems to be doing well so I don’t think it’s a slight against Polievre that he lost. Carney is just a strong competitor. I kinda wish Harper would give it another run however. Dude was amazing.
1
Majestic-Access-79071 day ago
+1
They tried with Erin O Toole no?
1
myslead2 days ago
+11
What a loser
11
Biggieholla2 days ago
+20
And yet that m*********** Rogan had him on as a guest instead of an actual leader like Carney.
20
IceIsGestapo7772 days ago
+20
Rogan is a cancer. Yet media companies keep feeding him money and resources for the cancer to grow. It’s fucked. Like go back to fear factor ffs
20
Mountain_rage2 days ago
+10
He is the Oprah for sad insecure men.
10
Starky513_2 days ago
+7
Carney would decline lol
7
Doc_1200_GO2 days ago
+5
I guess going on Rogan to talk about “Communism” and beef tallow wasn’t the boost he was hoping for.
5
clycoman2 days ago
+2
He honestly should not have been chosen as the Cons leader at their last leadership convention. He grasped defeat from the jaws of victory in the last Federal election, lost his own riding. He is a terrible candidate.
2
JaZepi2 days ago
+2
Word on the street is his resignation is coming.
2
Ash_Killem2 days ago
+1
He is calling for by-elections.
1
CBowdidge1 day ago
+2
He voted against floor crossings triggers by-elections in 2012
2
downvote4pedro2 days ago
+1
Poilievre seems to have shifted to the long game. No longer as pro America, settling into the "official opposition" role. I think he's counting more on the "New" NDP stealing liberal votes in the next election than actually swinging voters. That said he will absolutely jump on any obvious scandal or weakness.
1
Hudre1 day ago
+1
Conservatives in Canada think Carney is bribing these guys to cross over lol. The reality is that every single one of them is a reflection of Poilievre's leadership (or lack thereof). He lost the election AND his seat. They had to kick someone else out to get his back.
1
CBowdidge2 days ago
+165
This one is a surprise. She's pretty far right and a PP loyalist, but even she has her limits. The other three Conservatives were from the moderate wing and Lori Idlout is from the NDP (the left wing party in Canada). Speculation is there maybe up to ten.
165
thirty7inarow2 days ago
+151
It's actually baffling, to the point where I'm actually shocked the Liberals were even willing to accept her into caucus. She's one of the most questionable MPs in the country, and it's hard to fathom why she would make this change unless it's some kind of kamikaze move.
151
CBowdidge2 days ago
+55
It's been suggested she might not run in the next election or get re-elected. So, maybe she's hoping to get PP ejected.
55
Perfect-Hovercraft-32 days ago
+42
If she waits it out until the next election, her pension is secured^^ this ensures a potential LPC majority and guarantees her a tasty pension
42
entityXD321 day ago
+2
She's been MP for 11 years she already qualified for her pension
2
Chanana42 days ago
+44
I suspect the only reason the Liberals were willing to let her in (and why she wanted out) is because she's not the only one leaving today....I could see some type of announcement later tonight about the group of 10 mps leaving for the LPC.
44
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+23
Bro just how bad is PP's leadership that he's caused this much turmoil within his own party in like just a year? 💀
23
UmelGaming2 days ago
+9
Well, you see, even ignoring his own personal views, etc., his strategy for the last 2+ years has been to hold down Caucus with an iron grip. Don't let them have talks or interviews with the press. When he does do interviews, he or a handpicked group of 3 or so are the ones allowed to talk. These questions must be pre-asked/pre-screened beforehand. If someone tries to pull a fast one and ask a question he doesn't like, he berates them. He didn't even let the press travel with him during his campaign.
On the point of "don't let them have talks or interviews," he wouldn't even let his MPs/Candidates appear on local news for events and/or debates. He only let up slightly when he lost so hard; he lost his own seat and was out of parliament for a while. Afterwards, they were able to talk to the press some. Just recently, he sent a message to all his members of his "Shadow Cabinet" (basically the people in his caucus he would put in Cabinet positions should he become PM), asking them to prove themselves capable of the position.... although he himself isn't capable of being PM.
As I said, that doesn't even get into his voting history and/or political stances. If I was an MP under him, I would leave too.
9
Chanana41 day ago
+3
So to add to what Umel said.... regional conservatives associations in Ontario, Atlantic provinces and Quebec have been completely cast aside and pretty much are now fully ignored by PP.
Poilievre has shifted his party to only care about the grievances of Alberta/Saskatchewan and many MPs are now feeling that the CPC no longer represents the interest of their voters lol
Also PP is showing to everyone with a pulse that his political instinct is beyond terrible. He cannot for his life modify his messaging and keeps returning to the same 3 worded slogans he's been using for the past 20 years. Frankly he's bad at politics and he's trying to force feed the American MAGA formula to Canadians and its not working lol
3
quantumrastafarian2 days ago
+19
They'll take anyone if it puts them firmly in power. They'd probably take Poilievre himself.
She's making the change because she's getting something out of it. We just don't know what. She's an opportunist only looking after herself.
19
Alex_the_X2 days ago
+6
This comment is so underrated.
It is obvious Carney will go a long way and do whatever it takes if it means 4 years of majority.
6
workingwet2 days ago
+3
I mean aren’t they pretty well already guaranteed a majority with the 2 bi elections so they don’t even need Gladu?
3
Zomunieo2 days ago
+2
They need a tiebreaker after the speaker, and realistically you need a margin of 2-3, since over the next 3 years a few people in a group of 175 people who are on average 50+ will leave or be forced to leave for some reason.
2
InvisibleLandBorder2 days ago
+7
The liberals traditionally aren't as selective as they were under Trudeau. They've always been the centrists. Even Chretien overall was more like Carney than Trudeau.
7
thirty7inarow2 days ago
+5
It's not even a political alignment issue, really.
It's more that Gladu brings some serious skeletons, risks needless controversy if she pulls any similar stunts while on their side of the aisle, and her very willingness to join them comes across as suspicious.
5
BrgQun2 days ago
+2
They accepted her, since this gives them the majority they need to alter parliamentary committee membership.
There are 3 by-elections coming up, two of which the liberals are likely to win, but the third is a toss up. Prior to Gladu crossing the floor, the liberals would have needed to win all three by-elections to get the "real" majority they need. Now they only need the two shoe-ins.
(note: in our parliamentary system, one of the seats is lost to the speaker, who breaks ties, but generally votes to maintain the status quo. A one seat majority allows you to win some votes with the speaker as tiebreaker, like defeating confidence motions that would topple the govt, but for shaking up the status quo, you need one more non-speaker vote, which Gladue now gives them if they hold their two shoe ins).
2
OkFix40742 days ago
+37
PP did ask his MPs to Justify their roles recently - this is from a dude who lost his own riding and the election after biggest lead in recent history. People just dont like a micro managing and whiny boss , be it in burger joint or in the parliament !
[https://www.thestar.com/politics/political-opinion/conservative-mps-bristle-as-pierre-poilievre-asks-them-to-justify-their-roles/article\_91ae5e9f-22e3-4d8c-9399-f407500ce9dc.html](https://www.thestar.com/politics/political-opinion/conservative-mps-bristle-as-pierre-poilievre-asks-them-to-justify-their-roles/article_91ae5e9f-22e3-4d8c-9399-f407500ce9dc.html)
37
CBowdidge2 days ago
+15
Yep! And on CBC, they were saying there could be up to ten.
15
LadyHartell2 days ago
+11
I spoke to someone who knows Gladu personally, and this is basically what they said Gladu’s problem with PP is. He micromanages everything, and as a very headstrong woman, she wasn’t having it anymore.
11
3000doorsofportugal2 days ago
+1
So basically "f*** this I quit and im going over to the competition!"
1
UmelGaming2 days ago
+2
basically yeah. Then there is the fact that her riding is one of our manufacturing ridings in Ontario. ie, one of the ones hit the hardest under Trump's actions. It's believed she may not run again, so she did this to stick it to PP and to rally behind Carney's economic policies to mitigate the damage in her riding.
Even if she runs as a Liberal in the next election, her riding is a fairly safe CPC seat, so I doubt she will win. Evidence she isn't planning on running again.
2
BlackandRead2 days ago
+5
I missed that somehow. Jesus, what a tool.
5
Ok-Swimmer-26342 days ago
+12
Apparently she's actually pretty fervent about environmentalism, curiously enough. But I am still curious about her defection, yes. I've seen speculation that she just wants to sit on the back-bench with whatever benefits the Liberals offered her then retire once her term is up (she does look close-ish to retirement age)
12
DangerBay20152 days ago
+15
Eh, she's a social conversative which I absolutely have no time for, but in other ways she's strong on environmentalism (for a conservative) and has always been a *very* strong advocate for industry and infrastructure (her background), and her riding is very blue collar. It sounds like she's basically decided that crossing the floor will net better deals for her and her riding than staying with the conservatives, especially in light of the current government's infrastructure bonanza.
I expect the LPC will try to keep her more... batshit social conservativism on a tight leash, because there's a *very* real risk that you can make the Big Tent *too* big, and it's not insane to think some more progressives members of the Liberal party jump ship to the NDP (although so far the Liberals are winning that floor crossing race, too).
15
Wolferesque2 days ago
+2
All the defected Conservative MPs were a PP loyalist until the tide changed. My MP Chris D’Entremont spent years parroting Poilievre’s attacks and using populist rhetoric. On one occasion he co-wrote a vicious open letter to the Liberal fisheries minister calling her amongst other things a Marxist with wacko idealogy.
2
Nervous_Recover_61521 day ago
+1
I wonder what the liberals are pitching. There must be some big policy changes they’re about to push through once a majority is gained.
1
alexsteen7891 day ago
+1
Apparently a lot of conservative MP's think they'll lose their seat next election because ppl vote for the leader not the mp, and PP is gonna flop agajn. This is just more greasy politics of people trying to save their precious seat (or massive paycheck), rather then represent the ppl they were elected by
1
Canadian-and-Proud1 day ago
+1
Now she’s loyal to Carney’s pp
1
duglarri2 days ago
+67
It's simple enough: Carney is a more attractive Conservative leader than the current Conservative leader.
67
jard222 days ago
+41
The Canadian people are just happy to have someone who isn't a lunatic
41
Clemburger1 day ago
+1
Also happy our current PM isn’t dating Katy Perry
1
canadiankidwho21 day ago
+2
still can't believe that's real. the EX-CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA DATING POP STAR LEGEND KATY PERRY. that's some tomodachi life stuff right there
2
ChiefChunkEm_1 day ago
+2
Carney is not a liberal, he definitely seems like a centrist and that’s what every prime minister/president should be
2
Ok-Working37142 days ago
+132
Watching my far right coworker today absolutely crash out over all these “traitors” was the best part of my day
132
LifeGainsss2 days ago
+71
Make sure to remind them about bill C-306 in 2011. It would have forced an election any time someone crossed the floor, the conservatives had a majority and voted it down, including Poilievre
71
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+2
Well well well, if it isn't the consequences of my (and my party's) own actions 😂 though I'm sure PP will find a way to blame it on the woke left fake news media somehow
2
YourLoveLife2 days ago
+26
When your constituents elect you under one platform and you do a complete 180 and join another platform, how is that not betraying your constituents?
26
cyclemonster2 days ago
+25
We should ask the constituents of Battle River - Crowfoot to weigh in on that question
25
Ctrl-Alt-Q2 days ago
+17
A Liberal majority is looking extremely likely in the near future. This is the point in time in which conservative MPs have the most leverage to get things for their constituents. The people left sitting on the Conservative side will have little influence except to make pithy remarks in the House of Commons.
PP's national agenda isn't happening; these MPs can at least make progress on their local agendas. I don't think that's a betrayal, it's just pragmatism.
17
ridelance2 days ago
+11
It’s a feature of the Westminster system. We have regular elections so if the voters don’t like they will have an opportunity to punish the floor crossers or the party within a couple of years. I recall when Alleslev crossed over from the Liberals to the CPC there was no outrage from the CPC, instead they celebrated.
Floors crossings have occurred federally and provincially hundreds of times since confederation. They’re a feature not a bug.
11
Alex_the_X2 days ago
Summary: if the result of an election is changed soon after an election, it's ok cuz you have another election 5 years later.
It's a feature!
0
ShaqShoes2 days ago
+4
So what are you arguing for? That these MPs should be legally compelled to vote in line with their party? "Crossing the floor" is more of a symbolic declaration but for practical purposes all they are doing is voting in line with a different party.
4
FeebleCursed1 day ago
+2
As someone who lived in a riding where a longtime Liberal crossed the floor to join Harper's conservatives, and later a longtime NDP member went independent before going Green. I can tell you it's complicated.
From the perspective of the floor crossing MPs, and the people who continue to support them, the party they've vacated is not representing the local constituents as promised. From the perspective of the party partisans, it's undemocratic and motivated by self interest.
Which perspective is more true than the other really depends a lot on the issues that are local to that riding, and the national press corps does an absolutely awful job at capturing the local feelings. So we're left with over-simplified questions about electoral fairness versus Canadian democratic norms, with partisans rushing to the talking points that best represent their party at that moment.
2
Harbinger20012 days ago
+1
She will have talked to many of the politically active ones in her riding.
1
AmbitiousBossman1 day ago
+1
Exactly... All these celebration comments don't grasp the respect of the voter
1
BigGwep1 day ago
+1
Enjoy the dystopian censorship laws later this year, I will be celebrating from the US when carney pushes those in too ;)
1
Itisd2 days ago
+19
The Cons should get there heads out of their asses and admit that Poilievre is the reason that they lost the last election. The last election was polling as close to a guaranteed win for the cons as they could get, and Poilievre absolutely blew it because he is cut from the same cloth as Trump. The Cons continued support for Poilievre after this epic failure further proves that the Cons are more interested in Trump style BS than they are in actually trying to solve some of the very significant challenges that Canada is facing right now.
It is worth mentioning that The Trudeau administration was generally hated by the population, and he did cause a great deal of economic issues across the country. The only reason that Trudeau kept winning elections over and over was due to the Cons bringing ineffective, out of touch, phoney baloney leaders to the table. Carney has been a very reasonable (and ironically very conservative) prime minister so far, but it's a miracle that he won at all considering the damage that the Liberal party had allowed to occur on their watch... The fact that the Liberals won simply says that even with everything that happened before, they were still a better choice than Poilievre and the Cons... So again, the Cons don't seem to be able to read the room and realize they need to drastically overhaul their mess of a party if they want to win.
19
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+5
I mean it should tell you something of where the conservative party is headed that Carney who could've easily run as a conservative candidate in another election is now heading the liberal party, and people really like him. The overton window has shifted so much
5
island-roamer2 days ago
+43
I think we're underestimating how shitty it is being on the opposition side of House. I think these folks want to feel like they're actively contributing to governance, and not just knee-jerk-negative reacting to anything the government proposes.
The Liberals are demonstrating what it takes to be successful. The Cons need a more moderate, likeable, sharp candidate who is close to center. Carney has shown that you can collect assets from the other parties if you can steer the ship in that direction. Is this what Harper did? I can't remember.
43
Ctrl-Alt-Q2 days ago
+24
I'm fairly left-leaning, but I'm not too good to vote for a centrist conservative who isn't pushing US-inspired culture war nonsense. If their platform is better than the others, I'll vote for it.
I suspect if Carney had run as a conservative, the election might have gone differently - because people were swayed by their perception of his competence, and by his clear stance about how he was going to handle the US.
The conservatives need a clear vision, and a leader who can embody it. Pierre Poilievre is not that candidate.
24
xGray32 days ago
+8
Same. This honestly has me questioning the assumed wisdom of all that culture war BS. Carney has provided a unifying message and a steady hand in government and people are so here for it. I think we're all just so tired of the chaos and constant divisiveness. People are hungry for someone that they can believe in and feel safe putting their trust in.
8
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+2
This is definitely a big part of Carney's appeal especially in this current political environment and why he won the last election (with assist from PP's good buddy Trump). People are just severely culture war fatigued
2
Ecsta2 days ago
+10
Poilievre lost the election much more than Carney won it.
10
PenonX1 day ago
+1
Not sure how you think it would've changed, but I agree it would've gone differently in the sense Carney probably would've got a supermajority if he was running as a Conservative. At the very least, a solid majority. He lost a lot of votes simply for running under the Liberal banner.
1
Ctrl-Alt-Q1 day ago
+1
I agree. The momentum was absolutely with the conservatives. It was a shocking fumble given how much the country was tired of the Liberals under Trudeau.
1
Better_Ice30891 day ago
+2
The issue is the last candidate they ran was Erin O’toole who ran an extremely moderate campaign that failed spectacularly. Polievre got the party the best results it’s had since the 80s. What’s the next move forward for the Cons is hard to pick. They’re in an unenviable spot.
2
NoSuggestion28362 days ago
+2
Harper seemed quite conservative to me, though I was pretty young at the time. I remember being concerned that he might try to repeal marriage equality, and there was that “Stop Harper” student thing. Oh, and I believe he made a comment about “old stock Canadians” 🤮. Trudeau seemed refreshingly aligned with most Canadians’ viewpoints in comparison
2
island-roamer2 days ago
+2
I think Harper succeeded because he was largely successful in tamping down the far right social policy (religion, gay rights, women's rights), he kind of got control of it and silenced it. I think Canadians are for the most part fiscally conservative and socially liberal - but that's just my take.
If that is generally true, it explains why Carney is so popular.
2
CBowdidge1 day ago
+2
Yep. Nailed it. Harper was a smart and savvy politician (not saying I like him. I don't). The only time the CPC won was under him. We're pretty centrist as a country. Stay out of the culture wars, and leave people alone and you're fine. The CPC doesn't understand that.
2
Dunkelz2 days ago
+111
Hilarious how all Carney has to do is point across the border and say "see what voting conservative gets you??"
111
C2SKI2 days ago
+105
He's done so much more than that
105
Trap_Masters2 days ago
+2
I agree with you but I think at least for the uninformed voters, whose votes are easily swayed in elections, and who don't really pay attention to what Carney has done so far, Carney pointing to the south of the borders probably is a much more convincing argument for those people which helps his overall outlook amongst all Canadians
2
WillNotComplyToGoons1 day ago
+1
like what?
1
obliviousmousepad2 days ago
+36
In Canada we are so democratic that even if you vote conservative, the liberals get the seat
36
OkFix40742 days ago
+24
to be fair NDP also crossed to join the government , just accept Canada is a centrist country. PC/ centrist values will every day win over extreme right or left in this country.
24
AgreeAndSubmit1 day ago
+2
🤗🤗🤗 you guys are so cool.
2
BornNerd781 day ago
+3
We don't vote for parties here...
3
gimmedatvoice2 days ago
+5
The conservatives had a chance to force a by-election in these cases when Bill C-306 was brought in 2012. Guess which way they voted, along with PP himself?
5
axloo71 day ago
+3
It's funny because because you still think you vote for a party instead of a candidate.
One day perhaps people will understand.
3
obliviousmousepad1 day ago
+1
Would she have got elected running under an independent banner? No? Interesting. 99.5% of MP votes align with the party they are sitting under. Sounds like party actually matters tremendously
1
axloo71 day ago
+1
She probably would if all candidates had been independent.
They just have to put the "conservative party" logo under her name to help the people who don't understand the electoral system.
It's too much of a hassle apparently for the average voter to spend a cupple minutes looking up who there candidates are and what views they have on topics.
If you don't trust the MP to not walk to the other side then perhaps the voters should not have voted for them.
Or more accurately perhaps the conservative party should not have endorsed there position in that riding.
There are party politics people can engage in that decide these things. If you want to make a change get involved.
1
Yoshichage1 day ago
+1
you only proved the guy’s point lmfao
1
TheMadBaronRvUS1 day ago
+1
The party whip means that we do vote for a party, and this mealy-mouthed liberal talking point all over Listnook is really stale.
1
3000doorsofportugal2 days ago
+2
Man if only a certain bill had been proposed in that past to trigger a by election for floor crossings.... oh wait an attempt was made and the Conservatives voted against it!
2
TzeentchsTrueSon1 day ago
+3
How did Poilievre win his leadership race?
3
maniacchef711 day ago
+2
If someone wants to join another party that isn’t a problem but there must be an election for that riding!! They were not elected as an MLA for that party and being able to stay a minister should be illegal IMO!!
2
FlyGuyYYZ191 day ago
+2
PPs next leadership review will be interesting, if he even makes it that far… 🫣
2
Any-Ad-4461 day ago
+2
Hell ya..love Carney he is not the typical woke liberal. He still believes in freedom of choice but not push it or willing to spend money on token fringe groups projects. He is very smart in finances and willing to cross the aisle to meet opposition leaders for compromises. He made deals with Ford and Chow in Ontario which are complete opposite and made them both happy. F maga and their idealogy.
2
try_repeat_succeed2 days ago
+4
I kind of understand the (4) conservative MPs wanting to get off a sinking (PP) ship and join the party that holds power and is gaining momentum… but the (1) NDP MP that did so, I don’t really get. Could see getting off a sinking ship being a motive as well but with Avi Lewis theirs a chance they get a ressurgence. The NDP (and this individual MP) obviously has more leverage in a liberal minority vs majority.
I saw someone (it might’ve been Avi Lewis actually) said, “if Canada had proportional representation, and could do so, the majority of Canadians would choose the Liberal Minority option”. I know I would prefer it to a majority as they have to collaborate across the aisle which I think represents more of us than if they have all the decision making power without need for collaboration.
Curious what other think.
4
McGrevin2 days ago
+34
For the NDP - liberal convert I think it's important to note a few things.
- they represent Nunavut and they only beat the liberal by 41 votes last election
- There's a huge focus on building up Canada's armed forces as well as arctic infrastructure to support a stronger arctic military presence
- Nunavut is probably the most natural place for much of this spending to occur
- by jumping to the liberals she gets to say she influenced stuff to help Nunavut, regardless of whether anything she did actually changed the numbers. It looks great for her and she's still basically representing the same number of voters, so backlash is unlikely.
34
FiveThreeTwo2 days ago
+10
I might have this wrong, but i thought i also remember reading or hearing at the time - the culture of MPs/parliament members is different up north than other ridings around the country.
It was my understanding that they truly vote for the member (as the number of constituents is small, communities are closer) - and they sort of collectively match their needs of the community with the MP and more or less trust the MP when it comes to things like crossing the floor. So they don't see it as; I want conservative brand so i'm voting conservative.. Much of it is is aligning with a person that matches their wants/needs on culture or job creation or public funding or exposure to northern issues.
Which oddly enough, lol is how Canadian politics was envisioned lol before it turned into factions - you voted for your local representative and not the PM candidate or party (which is a big thing many americans or even staunchly opinionated canadians still get confused about).
You voting for the person probably meant naturally that they aligned on party affiliation, but thats just the vehicle they chose to deliver results for the riding/people in area. That's what enabled traditional floor crossing; because if you picked the candidate that worked for your local ridings needs - moving to another party that better suited the local needs/wants from a pure output perspective (not just "we want blue" or "we want red" - but more is my local riding getting actual economic results, better quality of life, or getting more out of current policy vs. an alternative) makes more sense. It's sorta only the last 3 decades being married to the US, social media, and by proximity assumption that Canadian politics = American, and people think systemically and in general they are voting for the PM or the Party. But they are technically voting for the MP to represent them in how they see fit.
10
nightonfir32 days ago
+3
Yes this is very true but even the American system was envisioned this way. That is why they have the electoral college. I think the system has broken with our lack of strong community and the growth of news and instant communication. This allows national leaders to communicate with us and we never meet our local leaders.
3
try_repeat_succeed2 days ago
+3
Interesting points, thanks for sharing!
3
Agitated_Award_98312 days ago
+9
\> with Avi Lewis theirs a chance they get a ressurgence
LOL no.
9
mcurbanplan2 days ago
+6
Honestly, this makes zero sense. She was never a centrist Conservative but firmly a right wing wacko that even the leadership of the Conservative party didn't like. Anti vax, anti LGBT, the whole 9 yards.
Also, what's the point of voting when your MP does this?
MPs in Canada are trained seals who do what the leader and party says and are considered mavericks if they dissent 5% of the time... so most people are *not* voting for the candidate themselves.
Canadians know this. During the 2011 election, the NDP was so popular in Quebec that [university students](https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/10/10/les-mcgill-five-sollicitent-tous-un-second-mandat) with no experience and even a candidate who [couldn't speak French](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Ellen_Brosseau#2011_election) (and was out of the country during the campaign!) beat longtime incumbents in rural Quebec.
6
Ecsta2 days ago
+12
In Canada you vote for the person not the party.
12
CipherWeaver2 days ago
+2
Eh, this is a weird one. This lady is an anti-vaxxer and has said some crazy stuff. By all rights Carney should refuse her, but he won't because he wants his majority.
2
UmelGaming2 days ago
+3
Yes, but she is also from a manufacturing-heavy riding in Ontario, hit by Trump's economic practices. PP also just pissed off a large portion of his caucus recently with reports to as much as 10 MPs considering on crossing the floor. She also only needs to last another full term and she nets her pension.
So rather than retire under PP, she decided to cross the floor, stick the knife into PP's back after he pisses her off, then join Carney's fiscally conservative tent, which could help her manufacturing-heavy riding. If she joined specifically to get economic policies passed and has decided to give up her social-conservative policies, such as anti-vaxxer stances, to get the economic ones she needs passed, I am for it. The real problem is if in the next election, if Carney continues to try and be PM, if she runs under his banner again.
3
Repulsive_Chemist2 days ago
C’mon one more one more!
0
CBowdidge1 day ago
+1
They're coming and by-elections
1
MachineDog902 days ago
+1
Ita double edged sword here political, if Carney gets his majority, he safe until the next election without needing other parties support, but then its completely his show and the current political shift we will see were everyone stands in the next few years.
1
Atiaxra1 day ago
+1
Politics has been banned in my work trailer since my coworker wouldn't stop complaining & was pretty close to being violent
1
Big_Albatross_30501 day ago
+1
Pollivere has basically turned the Conservatives into a Bloc Style party for Alberta/Saskatchewan.
I'm expecting the party to fracture at some point and create an East/West divide for the Conservatives
1
tmuellerc1 day ago
+1
Bullshit, the tides will turn one day. Majority of liberals in Canada are bootlickers just like the MAGA bums in the states
1
EffectAccomplished151 day ago
+2
Why would anyone vote for a conservative in Canada after seeing what trump is doing in America
2
Hefty-Strike-61711 day ago
+1
Proving that Canadian’s in general don’t fall for American Style Politics
1
TheLibraR1 day ago
+1
As a Canadian and Long-time Liberal.... I don't like it when either party is too strong and takes control.... Because they start doing stupid things.
1
Outrageous-Dish-43751 day ago
+1
What does it really matter? Aren't they all just going to vote the way they want? Titles mean nothing, they are still conservatives
1
MeasurementQueasy751 day ago
+1
This shit should be f****** illegal. We dont vote for this. Why can the government just decide to change itself
1
yycoding1 day ago
+1
Money dictates most of what happens in politics but not always. Polievre is the leader that Canada's ultra-rich want in power, but to represent them effectively he has to advocate for policies that the vast majority of Canadians reject. Or we see it play out more as opposition to things most Canadians like and want.
1
Weekly-Bear-24181 day ago
+1
How did carn dog pull shrek to the other side of the swamp is the real question. I bet he’s got a lil stash of gum drop buttons for all of his new friends
1
Budget_Technology8941 day ago
+1
The Liberals are conservative, the Conservatives are reformed, they're new. New Democrats are liberal.
1
alwaysonesteptoofar1 day ago
+1
The conservatives are sticking with Pollievre the way Liberals did Trudeau. I get that its not good to swap leaders too often but could we just have 4 parties with viable leaders at the same time?
1
djflylo691 day ago
+1
Can we recognize that a liberal majority is the pressing concern here? Why is it that everytime I open a comment section for these articles I see commenters just talking about how embarrassed and dumb Polievre must feel after losing party members. I get the Pierre is a dumb f*** but how can you not see what they’re trying to do? The liberals have been tabling horrendous legislation since carney came in that are raising red flags for a lot of people about stripping peoples rights away. Majority governments are very undemocratic and will allow this new wave Harper government to do horrible things. Why is it that all we’re talking about is how shitty of a party leader Pierre? there is an obvious concerted effort to come after us with a majority government that favours the financial ruling class. Start kissing your rights goodbye if you’re not wealthy
1
redbulldrinkertoo1 day ago
+1
Hope to never hear of PP ever again. Hope the PC's purge the Reform wing and get back to sensible policies. The far right Albertan crazies have had their run, time to end the culture wars.
188 Comments