*The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) is a peacekeeping mission established in 1978 to monitor the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon and restore security. Headquartered in Naqoura, it supports the Lebanese army and monitors the "Blue Line" ceasefire. The mission is currently under high-intensity conflict, with fatal attacks on peacekeepers reported in March 2026.*
48 years and still going. It's like time has no meaning when it's an old grudge in the mideast.
278
arathorn3Mar 31, 2026
+254
And in 2006 after a war between Israel and Lebanon UNFIL as retasked to support the Lebanese army in making sure Hezbollah was not firing.rockets into Israel from South of the Litani river. (UN Security council resolution 1701).
The Lebanese army and Unfil have.proven themselves either incompetent at best or in collusion with Hezbollah at worst in following UN Security council resolution 1701 as by spring 2007 Hezbollah was.firing.rockers into Israel again and has continued to do so periodically for 20 years.
Israel got fed up and decided to enforce UN resolution 1701 thenselves.
254
FireRonZookApr 1, 2026
+75
They were Irish peacekeepers. Is there really any question of incompetence vs collusion?
75
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
+10
Not sure what you're getting at, could be both lol
10
I_SawTheSineMar 31, 2026
+12
Perhaps they could enforce [UN resolution 242](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_242) while they're at it.
12
thewoobaApr 1, 2026
+39
Yeah, all of that land in the Sinai still held by israel makes me angy
39
YogiBarelyThereApr 1, 2026
+26
Israel withdrew from all of Sinai as of 1982. That decision led to peaceful relations with Egypt. What land in the Sinai are you referring to?
26
eyl569Apr 1, 2026
+25
I assume they were being sarcastic
25
YogiBarelyThereApr 1, 2026
+9
I think you must be right,
9
thewoobaApr 1, 2026
+8
Can confirm, was being sarcastic
8
Red-Flag-PotemkinApr 1, 2026
+6
Oslo kinda supersedes 242.
6
randomacceptablenameApr 1, 2026
+2
>Israel got fed up and decided to enforce UN resolution 1701 thenselves.
Sure, that may be justifiable.
However, forcing a 1/5th of the country's population to evacuate, and saying that they will not be able to return while destroying civilian infrastructure and homes while under occupation and not allowing civilians to return is not. Every single one of those things is a war crime and Israel has done, or has said it will do, all of them.
It is as if they can't understand that despite beating their enemies over and over again militarily, they will come back to fight again until the underlying issues are solved. Hezbollah, after all, was created to fight the Israeli occupation of Lebanon. How many times do they plan to go through this cycle? If it weren't destroying so many lifes it would almost be tragically comedic.
2
ScumBunnyExApr 1, 2026
+26
For almost 3 years since October 7th and until the pretend cease-fire with Lebanon Israel's entire north was evacuated as all of Israel's towns along the border were being hammered by direct fire as well as rockets and missiles. Not a peep out of Canada.
The cease fire was supposed to allow Israelis to finally safely return to their homes, but right now towns like Metula and Rosh Ha'ain up north as well as northern cities beyond the border like the Haifa metropolitan area are still being hammered by Hezbollah rockets and drones on a daily basis. I know because I have to run to the f****** shelter with my wife and kids evey few hours.
Israel once again needs to do whatever it takes to secure the safety of it's citizens. That's what countries are supposed to do.
26
randomacceptablenameApr 1, 2026
+9
>For almost 3 years since October 7th and until the pretend cease-fire with Lebanon Israel's entire north was evacuated as all of Israel's towns along the border were being hammered by direct fire as well as rockets and missiles.
The evacuations in Israel are ordered by Israeli authorities, or done out of fear by Israeli civilians. Neither the government of Lebanon nor Hezbollah came there to enact those evacuations. In southern Lebanon, Israeli authorities are orderiing evacuations. These are not equivalent things. Not even remotely close.
>Not a peep out of Canada.
Canada not only publically denounced Hezbollah for its actions 3 years ago and now by calling them illegal. It also lists it as a terrorist organization. So by default any military act it decides to take is illegal by definition. Not only are you just simply incorrect but what more would you expect from Canada?
>The cease fire was supposed to allow Israelis to finally safely return to their homes, but right now towns like Metula and Rosh Ha'ain up north as well as northern cities beyond the border like the Haifa metropolitan area are still being hammered by Hezbollah rockets and drones on a daily basis. I know because I have to run to the f****** shelter with my wife and kids evey few hours.
Like I said: actions against Hezbollah may be justified. I am no lawyer but they seem plainly justified. That is not at issue.
Acts against Lebenese civilians is not. That is at issue. As you clearly point out above, what you see being done to you and your neighbourhood is not acceptable. Yet you somehow see it as acceptable against the Lebanese civilians? Not only is that illogjcal it is absurd.
>Israel once again needs to do whatever it takes to secure the safety of it's citizens. That's what countries are supposed to do.
No they are not. If you accept this statement than why is Hezbollah not allowed "to do whatever it takes to secure" their safety and interests? Again you are being completely illogical. If Israel can justifiably terrorise a neighbouring country, displace millions, bulldoze homes, and destroy infrastructure; than why aren't Israel's neighbours allowed to do the same to Israel?
Fighting wars is not illegal. How wars are fought can be. You compare Israel's actions to Hezbollah's actions as if there is some equivalence here. Hezbollah is a terrorist organization. Are you seriously suggesting that the world should look at its actions and compare them to Israel's? Are you really defending Israel on the same playing field as a terrorist organization? Because we don't treat Israel as one and we expect a hell of a lot better from it than we do from Hezbollah.
9
ScumBunnyExApr 1, 2026
+17
Leabnon has failed to enforce it's own sovereignty over its south time and again, allowing Hezbollah to entrench itself there and constantly attack Israel's north even after the most recent cease fire.
If Lebanon nor the UN can't enforce it, who does? And how far do they need to go to not only push Hezbollah out, but to make sure they don't return right after?
It's easy for you to decide "no they are not" on whether Israel is allowed to go as far as it takes to keep it's people, as in me, safe. The thing is, "allowed" or not Israels neighbors Hezbollah (and the Houthis, and the Iraqi militias, and Iran itself) are already constantly attacking Israeli infrastructure and have been since the war started and before that from almost the moment Israel retreated from Lebanon (remember the 2006 war?). There are missiles dropping on the oil refineries across the bay from me every day, and interceptions or not some do hit.
Being "allowed" or "legal" isn't the deciding factor on whether my city goes boom.
So to me, and for a lot of Israelis, if the choice is between getting frowned upon by world leaders or even becoming a pariah state to not having to spend another day in a bomb shelter with our kids as we hear the sounds of rockets and interceptors blowing up overhead and frantically checking the news to see if anywhere we care about got hit this time? Yeah, f*** it. War crimes all the way. Nothing else worked so far.
Edit:
Well, nothing except peace. It worked with Egypt. Could have worked with Lebanon, if they got their shit together and actually took control of their own country.
I don't know. I may be one of the last remaining Israelis that still believes in peace. When we have elections this year I will be voting for a pro-peace party. And after the elections, with whatever constellation of hopefully less bugfuck insane politicians we have for a government, I hope and pray they give a chance to peace with Lebanon and as hard as it promises to be find a path to leaving Lebanon and handing the reigns back to the Lebanese.
But until then I just want ONE F****** DAY of not having to run to the bomb shelter.
17
Dvash1Apr 1, 2026
+8
What's your solution to the Hezbollah problem? I'm deeply interested. What would you do if you were Israel?
8
NoHetroApr 1, 2026
+13
They would bend over and take it, too afraid to be politically incorrect.
13
zapreonMar 31, 2026
+83
At the very least, UNIFIL will meet its end by December 2026. That massive waste of money will finally cease to exist
83
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
+2
Hopefully the rest of the UN is next
2
Blurry_BigfootApr 1, 2026
+5
A "grudge"?
There are rockets being launched at Israel by a terrorist organization. What is the correct response?
5
PMJamesPMMar 31, 2026
+118
Don’t know that it’s fair to say Lebanon ‘let’ Hezbollah in per se or even that there is one Lebanon. But they are there and they are a blight.
118
YellingatClouds86Mar 31, 2026
+64
It's really sad to see what has happened with Lebanon. Many of its Christians were forced out/fled. And the government is too weak to push Hezbollah and Iranian interests out. Sadly, that causes them to become a battleground between Israel and Iran because the Israelis get mad at Hezbollah's actions, which in turn create violence, which in turn makes things hell for the people of the country. The Lebanese are great people and I hate this for them.
64
PMJamesPMMar 31, 2026
+21
Agree. Michael Totten’s book, Fatima’s Gate is an interesting read. Most deserve much better than what they get all over that part of the world.
21
YellingatClouds86Mar 31, 2026
+5
Thanks, I'll have to check that one out.
5
CFOMaterialApr 1, 2026
+1
While it is sad what happened to the Christians in the country, I don't think pitying the Lebanese is correct in this instance. If they really wanted to, they could've worked with Israel to remove Hezbollah. They didn't because 1/3 of the population supports Hezbollah at least. You can't let literal terrorists control your country and not ask for help and then complain when this happens.
1
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+2
It's fair.
2
abu_hajarrMar 31, 2026
+198
So what is the legal response to rocket attacks from your neighbor?
198
OvaryunderpassMar 31, 2026
+118
It depends which side is Jewish according to the UN
118
PracticalYellow3Mar 31, 2026
+38
And after France screwed Lebanon by not helping them so Lebanon had to ask Israel for help which they obviously didn’t want to do.
38
poonslyr69Apr 1, 2026
+28
They've announced an intent to annex territory, which is what Carney is responding to.
Edit: for the curiously private profiles all saying essentially the same comment casting doubt;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/31/israel-vows-occupy-large-parts-southern-lebanon-expand-buffer-zone
"Israel says it will occupy swathes of south Lebanon and destroy the homes along the border to prevent the return of about 600,000 residents, prompting concerns of long-term forced displacement."
28
yoyo456Apr 1, 2026
+5
You're the only one using the term annex. Occupation and annexation are two very different things.
5
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
-10
They have? I've not seen the word annex thrown out
-10
theaircraftaviationApr 1, 2026
+6
Your ignorance doesn't mean it didn't happen
6
Alonzzo2Apr 1, 2026
-2
Your ignorance doesn't mean it did.
Also, you have no proofs (because it didn't).
-2
theaircraftaviationApr 1, 2026
+5
Cool
Reuters - Israeli minister calls for annexation of southern Lebanon https://share.google/J0QeM6NW5gD5mFH38
BBC- Israel to control large buffer zone in southern Lebanon, its defence minister says https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy91j9qwp4do
5
Alonzzo2Apr 1, 2026
+1
So? So a far right minister said Israel should, so he's not the sharpest tool... That doesn't mean Israel does it.
Also the fact Israel evacuated Lebanese villages again doesn't mean there will be settlements.
Israel fought Lebanon many times (terror organizations) yet never settled there.
They are evacuating villages because they are fighting Hezbollah which attacked Israel a month ago by firing many missiles, while hiding behind the civilians.
They could have not evacuated the villages but the ln many civilians would get hurt.
So it is your ignorance of the situation and the history is the problem here
1
theaircraftaviationApr 1, 2026
+1
If Pete Hegseth says America will send ground forces into Iran, will you say that's "it's not true since he's just a far right minister."
1
DogBarf00Apr 1, 2026
+1
Is Pete Hegseth in an equivalent position as an Israeli **finance** minister or is he the Secretary of **War**?
1
theaircraftaviationApr 1, 2026
+1
what about the source about Israelis defense minister lol
1
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
I was asking an honest question, you're a rude son of a b****
0
poonslyr69Apr 1, 2026
-4
Isn't it funny how everyone always defending Israel has a private profile, and those calling it out never do?
-4
ZeesoApr 1, 2026
+2
"Isn't it funny how I make shit up that can't be proven or disproven to further my point because I'm a dishonest piece of shit without any actual moral fiber?"
2
NowayisthatwayApr 1, 2026
-12
No, they said that they want to have a buffer territory. In no announcement did they ever say that they are going to annex.
-12
poonslyr69Apr 1, 2026
+12
A buffer territory which displaces 600,000 with explicitly stated intent to destroy the homes there and which takes up 1/3rd of Lebanon.
12
NebuchanderTheGreatApr 1, 2026
+2
Then they could make the buffer terrotory from THEIR OWN COUNTRY instead of invading their neighbours.
2
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
+3
That's not how it works, but you can yell some more
3
NowayisthatwayApr 1, 2026
-1
How about their neighbour stop launching rockets into their territory? Before Octover 7th, there were no, literaly no invasions into lebanon ever since 2006. No major escaltions between the sides. Nothing. So Lebanon could have honoured their part of the 2006 resolution and unarm hezbollah, yet they refused to do so.
And why should Israel create a buffer zone in their own country?
-1
[deleted]Apr 1, 2026
+4
[removed]
4
ScumBunnyExApr 1, 2026
-10
No. The Israel government announced their intent to secure a buffer zone in southern Lebanon. If the UN and the Lebanese government can't keep Hezbollah from establishing themselves there and constantly attacking Israel as they are right this very moment then someone has to.
-10
munchi333Mar 31, 2026
+14
Go to the UN so they can tell you to pound sand.
14
ux3lApr 1, 2026
+2
Displacing their uninvolved civilians for the feeling of safety of your civilians definitely isn't.
2
LifeOfHiApr 1, 2026
+1
Retaliatory attacks. Actually.
Taking territory is a whole different thing, and using attacks as a justification is what’s being questioned here.
1
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
+2
Taking it with a nice Canadian "sorry" and a smile apparently
2
mad-dataMar 31, 2026
+90
There was Lebanon Israel agreement on Hezbollah disarmament and removal from South Lebanon. Lebanon, being occupied by Iran, failed to execute it. What is illegal about Israel enforcing the agreement?
90
MVP_Legend_87Mar 31, 2026
+54
"Carney is also calling for a ceasefire, marking a strengthening of his government's language as the armed conflict worsens and Israeli ground troops move deeper into the country."
Yeah, there was a ceasefire until Hezbollah violated it by refusing to disarm, and by attacking Israel. Hezbollah firing rockets is what broke the ceasefire.
Perhaps Hezbollah shouldn't break the ceasefire if they don't want Israel to retaliate. I would argue Israel is legally allowed to defend themselves from a conflict Hezbollah started.
You know what though, PM Carney is more than welcome to send Canadian troops to help enforce the disarming of Hezbollah. Lebanon couldn't do it, but hey, if Carney supports the ceasefire he could help make sure this doesn't happen again by helping to disarm Hezbollah.
54
SleepyZMApr 1, 2026
+4
**17 October 2025:** [UN experts warn against continued violations of ceasefire in Lebanon and urge protection of civilians | OHCHR](https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/10/un-experts-warn-against-continued-violations-ceasefire-lebanon-and-urge)
>“Despite the ceasefire, Israel continues to strike Lebanese territory almost daily,” the experts said. “These attacks have resulted in a mounting toll of civilian deaths and injuries and destruction and damage of infrastructure, housing, the environment and agricultural zones vital to civilian livelihoods."
4
MVP_Legend_87Apr 1, 2026
+5
Part of the ceasefire agreement was that Hezbollah would disarm, or stay above the Litani. If they weren't doing that they were violating the ceasefire. Lebanon was also supposed to disarm Hezbollah, but they couldn't do that.
[https://www.peaceagreements.org/media/documents/IL\_LB\_241126\_Announcement\_of\_a\_Cessation\_of\_Hostilities\_and\_Related\_Commitments.pdf](https://www.peaceagreements.org/media/documents/IL_LB_241126_Announcement_of_a_Cessation_of_Hostilities_and_Related_Commitments.pdf)
If Hezbollah was not above the Litani and not disarming then they violated the ceasefire. So your argument is incorrect.
5
infraGemApr 1, 2026
+10
Evidently, Hezbollah kept re-arming and moving weapons and soldiers down below thd Litani.
They didn't adhere to what the agreement.
10
ScumBunnyExApr 1, 2026
+5
And by "Lebanese territory" they mean "Hezbollah assets" right? You know, the ones who are somehow suddenly firing tens of rockets and drones at Israel every day from all over Lebanon? Wasn't the UN supposed to be doing something about that? Like maybe even report that they weren't being disarmed as promised?
5
SleepyZMApr 1, 2026
+7
Not everything in Lebanon is Hez assets. Just like not everything in Gaza was Hamas assets but was blown up anyway. Its the same playbook
7
ScumBunnyExApr 1, 2026
+2
Of course not. But seeing as Hezbollah is currently very active in fighting Israel, is it so impossible to believe Israel was attacking non-disarmed Hezbollah assets specifically like it was saying all along and not just doing bombing runs on random Lebanese for shits and giggles?
2
HaptenMar 31, 2026
+97
Is this the same Lebanon that allowed Hezbollah to remain a major political and military actor for the last 20+ years? I understand, displacing hundreds of thousands of civilians is a terrible thing, but when you let a terrorist organization participate in your government and you're not doing anything about, don't be surprised when that someone starts retaliating.
97
Sea-Witness-2746Mar 31, 2026
+98
How is the invasion illegal when Hezbollah broke the ceasefire and attacked Israel ftom Lebanese land?
98
magicaldingusMar 31, 2026
+80
Because whenever Israel does something you're supposed to say "illegal" and then get lots of votes
80
FartExpoApr 1, 2026
-40
What's different between the illegal occupation and annexation of Lebanon, and the illegal occupation and annexation of Ukraine? Please, enlighten me
-40
yosisoyApr 1, 2026
+10
Self defense principle, further questions?
10
ArcFurnaceApr 1, 2026
+48
The part where Ukraine wasn't attacking Russia at all and Israel/Lebanon (well, mostly Hezbollah) have been in an on-and-off war for decades? We can argue about annexation, but invasion and occupation is a pretty standard part of warfare.
48
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+18
Useful idiot.
18
magicaldingusApr 1, 2026
+21
The difference is that no one annexed any part of Lebanon, ever.
That. And you know, Ukraine wasn't literally hosting a terrorist organization openly trying to take over Russia, equipped with elaborate plans to do so, going so far as to barrage them with rockets in unilateral acts of aggression, synchronizing themselves with similar minded terror groups.
21
Bright_Aside_6827Apr 1, 2026
Israel didn't stop bombing Lebanon during that "ceasefire". Where you following the news ?
0
YogiBarelyThereMar 31, 2026
+162
Haven't rockets been fired indiscriminately from Lebanon into Israel by Hizbollah for many years? It seems just to respond to that by removing the capacity for them to continue committing such acts.
162
RedNewzzApr 1, 2026
+26
Yes, and those rockets were fired at civilians in Northern Israel resulting in mass evacuation of 60,000 israelis for a solid year.
Reminder Hezbollah took Southern Lebanon by violent force and considers in "Palestinian Territory"...just as they do with Jordan and parts of Egypt.
People fixated on "The warvof Israeli aggression" really need to dig a little deeper into the history of the conflict.
26
dkonigsApr 1, 2026
+15
Yeah, but nobody cares about that and its barely even reported on.
But the moment Israel dares to actually shoot back? The whole world screams for a ceasefire and/or condemns them for taking action.
15
TrumpBad_UpvotesPlsMar 31, 2026
+43
They're just trying to do some anti-zionism my guy I don't see what the big deal is.
43
ThomYorkeSoupMar 31, 2026
+4
What's wrong with a little annexation among neighbours
4
Ultra_MetalMar 31, 2026
-51
Yes but the leader of Canada doesn't care because the victims are Jews.
-51
DisastrousAcshinMar 31, 2026
-28
Oh f*** off with that. Shitting on Israel isn't shitting on jews
-28
khiladi-Mar 31, 2026
+39
TheN explain why Hezbollah firing rockets is dismissed? The annexation didn't come out of thin air.
If neither Lebanon nor the UN can keep Hezbollah in check, Israel will do something about it, they can't afford to get attacked forever.
39
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+2
Did he/her answered yet or did they just ran away?
2
Ultra_MetalMar 31, 2026
+23
He's not shitting on Israel. He is ignoring the Jewish victims of Hezbollah's terrorist attacks. He is showing total disregard for the lives of Jews while pretending to care about the lives of others.
23
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+5
Like the rest of the useful idiots around the world, unfort...
5
philomathieApr 1, 2026
-1
How does this stop it? They moved the people and seized the land. Do you think that is going to make people want to attack them with rockets *less*?
After you killed their family and stole their home?
-1
DogBarf00Apr 1, 2026
+4
Yes because most of their rockets won’t be able to reach Israel.
4
philomathieApr 1, 2026
+1
Okay, but Israel takes it and builds houses like they did in the Golan heights, now you've just moved a border and pissed everyone off?
1
DogBarf00Apr 1, 2026
+1
The golan heights is the high ground, southern Lebanon is not.
1
YellingatClouds86Mar 31, 2026
+46
What about Iran's contiguous illegal occupation of Lebanon as its proxies limit government action and its ambassador refuses to leave?
46
AniviaKid32Mar 31, 2026
-31
>What about
Classic
-31
YellingatClouds86Mar 31, 2026
+19
It's moreso me getting tired of people not recognizing the nuances of Middle East politics and defaulting to their "Israel is bad!" rhetoric while giving the Iranians (and the Syrians before them) a pass.
19
Ionic_liquidsMar 31, 2026
+79
Lebanon declared war on Israel in 1948 and has maintained this position. They have tried to completely destroy Israel multiple times. Lebanon is still at war with Israel, and now has the cancer of Hezbollah, which has festered and destroyed their country, and threatens Israel. There is a history here. Where are the condemnations?
79
fuckin_atodasoMar 31, 2026
+30
Lebanon and Israel were actually on pretty good terms for awhile post-1948 or, at the very least, not openly hostile to each other. It was Arafat's PLO and the Palestinian population that ultimately fucked the entire country over in the 70s and relations have been soured since then.
That is not to say Israel is the good guy here, but Lebanon has been getting ethnically cleansed and occupied by a number of Arab factions for decades at this point and the international community only gets concerned when Israel is involved.
30
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+6
So you mean to tell me that "Palestinians are basically coming to places that aren't really theirs, making a claim for that land for themselves, and ruining said country and the lives of its population while highjacking the government? NO-WAY!!! /s
6
jpmjakeApr 1, 2026
+14
Not sure how Israel responding to decades of aggression from Hezbollah, Lebanon's inability to control their own territory, and the UN's utter failure to enforce its own ruling on controlling Hezbollah makes it an illegal invasion, but OK.
14
dce42Mar 31, 2026
+39
I would love to know what this fool is smoking. Lebanon starts another conflict with Israel, then whines that it's in conflict with Israel. UNFIL was supposed to bring peace not shield Lebanon from consequences of constantly starting donkey poo.
Edit: fixed a word
39
krayniacMar 31, 2026
+11
If Lebanon didn’t want to get invaded then Hezbollah should have been dismantled. The total failure of Lebanon and the UN to actually secure the border wholly justifies Israel’s invasion.
11
Dorkzilla_ftwApr 1, 2026
+2
Are we forgetting that it is not an invasion since Lebanon leader actually asked them to do so?
Like, there are many things to be outraged at but this ain't one.
2
CBT7commanderApr 1, 2026
+7
Lebanon attacked Israel here. Israel attacked Iran illegally, and then Lebanon (Hezbollah) attacked Israel. There is nothing illegal in invading southern Lebanon to fight Hezbollah, when it is Hezbollah that started hostilities
7
K0TEMApr 1, 2026
+6
So Hezbollah can violate the ceasefire by joining Iran, but retaliatory operations against a terrorist organisation is "Illegal"?
6
[deleted]Mar 31, 2026
+9
[removed]
9
ThePickleConnoisseurApr 1, 2026
+7
So is Israel supposed to let a terror orgs that’s been bombing them for decades continue after Lebanon failed the disarmament?
Feels like no one wants to actually but themselves in Israel’s shoes and just say “war bad” and people go with it. But these are the same people who appeased Putin in 2014
7
niceufo777Mar 31, 2026
+1
It's sad, but Lebanon let Hezbollah in... and they launched missiles and bombs; Israel was only defending itself.
1
MarcusP2Apr 1, 2026
-3
Israel's stated aim of depopulating the entire area probably strays into collective punishment areas though, which is illegal. There are plenty of people there that don't support or enable Hezbollah.
-3
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+8
And what about the 350K Israeli civilians that first had to be evacuated from northern Israel two years ago, and now found themselves under constant - and I mean constant barrages from Lebanon, after the Lebanese gov have come to a ceasefire agreement that supposedly was meant to allow people to go back to their homes.
These civilians are now TARGETED by Lebanon. So, yeh, it's Lebanon's turn to evacuate their people so that people in Israel can live without air raid sirens every ten minutes.
Lebanon is responsible for this first and the most
The UN is a close second.
So if anyone, including the UN, has got anyyyything to say about Israel solving ANOTHER one of the west's problems by her self- they can come crying to Lebanon, its gov, and the world's apathy towards attack on civilians because their Jews.
Anything else?
8
DaemonPrinceOfCornApr 1, 2026
I don’t think “we’re no worse than Hezbollah is the slam dunk argument you’re treating it as”.
0
dijonazeMar 31, 2026
-8
Let me guess, “living space”right?
-8
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+4
Let me guess, anti-semite, right?
4
dijonazeApr 1, 2026
-2
I’m literally Jewish lol
-2
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
-2
A. Yeh right whatever.
B. It doesn't mean you can't self-hate (not limited to the Jew faith obv.).
-2
Sgt_FoxApr 1, 2026
-8
Carney needs to be careful, I got a 2 day ban on here for saying Isreal has invaded Lebanon /s
-8
The_BooKeeperApr 1, 2026
+7
Just like I got banned from a thousand anti-semitic subs while dealing with anti-semites like yourself. Listnook is a shit place. Enjoy.
7
ImsorrywhatnowayApr 1, 2026
-2
Yet he opposed cutting funds to Supply arms for Israel. Make it make sense.
-2
Niceguy955Apr 1, 2026
Carney is welcome to send Canadian troops to disarm Hezbollah, and remove the reason for Israel’s military action in Lebanon. Or he can offer his opinion for free, to be disregarded by all involved.
111 Comments