· 172 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 14, 2026 at 7:23 PM

CDC says 41 people being monitored for hantavirus in US

Posted by numbermaniac



🚩 Report this post

172 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
leaky-owl-syndrome 23 hr ago +791
they kept track of ~30,000 people during the 2014-2015 ebola scare. by the time the USA had our patient zero for coronavirus, there were over 50,000 infected people in china. I don't think this virus has such a big pool of infected to spread from. "As of May 8, 2026, WHO has reported eight cases (six confirmed and two suspected), including three deaths." not that worried at this point
791
LasVegasNerd28 23 hr ago +239
Woah I did not know we had 30k being monitored during the Ebola scare. I thought it was like 20.
239
leaky-owl-syndrome 23 hr ago +177
it was over the whole year, but yeah they kept surprisingly good contact with almost 30k people. they claim they never lost contact for more than 48 hours with 99% of the people, for the entire year.
177
in_animate_objects 23 hr ago +145
Well to be fair we had competent people in charge then they probably were careful with information so they didn’t inspire a panic.
145
LasVegasNerd28 23 hr ago +28
That’s what I was thinking as I thought it over because as I was remembering the news I don’t think they talked about more than a few people being monitored. I miss competent people.
28
in_animate_objects 23 hr ago +18
Me too! I miss going to sleep at night and not worrying about what God awful thing we’re going to wake up to next, be it a bought and paid for ruling going against 100+ yrs of precedent from SCOTUS (most of the time on a shadow docket with no explanation given!) or that we’ve declared war on a country for their oil, or tariffed an island that has no human occupants.
18
swervyy 21 hr ago +5
With tech the way it is now I’d wager it’s pretty easy for the government to know literally your every move if they want to. Who knows how invasive they’ll be w surveillance for a virus but I wouldn’t put shit past em
5
Beard_o_Bees 23 hr ago +44
I'm trying to work out whether or not this is something that's worth staying tuned for. The media, overall, seem to really want people to be worried. Then there's thoughtful people like you that help put it into some sort of understandable perspective - so thank you.
44
rabidstoat 22 hr ago +43
The media is bored because Iran is in a stalemate.
43
Rocketeer006 20 hr ago +6
Yes, because Putin told Trump to keep the oil price high.
6
VillageLess4163 18 hr ago +6
Yes but what is Xi telling him to do? You know he just listens to the most recent despot he talked to.
6
Craiques 22 hr ago +13
It’s one of those things that you individually can’t do anything about. Stock up basic emergency supplies (canned goods, basic hygiene stuff, first aid, etc). You should generally already have that, especially if you live in a natural disaster hotspot. But otherwise just continue on like usual. The only thing worrying does is waste your time.
13
Raregolddragon 21 hr ago +8
True but after trump and his best buddy musky raided and gutted everything I doubt we have that capacity now.
8
Xsiah 23 hr ago +12
Exactly, thank you
12
Ok-Scar-9677 23 hr ago +12
Transmission is also on the lower end.   Unfortunately, the pateint generally dies before transmitting the virus to new victims.
12
AnaisNinja76 20 hr ago +7
We don't really know that though. Whatever is up with this variant seems to be different from previous infectiousness. People that got infected were sitting at a different table several feet away for like 15 minutes. Realistically, I don't know that spread is controllable regardless since the government dismantled the programs and reporting that's helped keep illnesses like this in check in the past.
7
Hereibe 23 hr ago +10
That was before DOGE. 
10
Candymanshook 20 hr ago +2
You shouldn’t be worried at all, tbh, unless you know someone whose been on that cruise
2
Formal-Radish1413 23 hr ago +3
Ive heard from medical people that the incubation prriod for this is much shorter and you develop serious symptoms etc much faster, therefore it doesnt spread as easily as COVID did.
3
key2mydisaster 17 hr ago +7
Symptoms can take up to 42 days to show up, and they haven't figured out how it is spread yet. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/can-hantavirus-spread-through-the-air-what-we-do-and-dont-know
7
Formal-Radish1413 15 hr ago +3
Lovely. Lets hope they caught it early by quarantining everyone right off the boat.
3
manic_andthe_apostle 15 hr ago +6
They didn’t. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/cdc-no-quarantine-hantavirus-cruise-passengers-1795962
6
Xsiah 1 day ago +3263
Over 3000 people in the US have had measles this year - how about you monitor them and everyone they're infecting with their stupidity, or the stupidity of their parents.
3263
ASimpleWaterBottle 23 hr ago +1526
Fun fact, you can do both
1526
EternitySearch 23 hr ago +427
Not with the number of people who have either left or been fired from the CDC over the last year.
427
Svennis79 23 hr ago +145
Was going to say.. what does cdc monitoring even mean now? Is it a maga influencer stalking the peoples socials, incase they post "feeling kinda sick, maybe its hanta"
145
cubsgirl101 23 hr ago +54
The majority of people at the CDC are still competent medical professionals. It’s just the top leadership whose job includes public relations who are idiot anti-science “MAHA” believers.
54
Svennis79 20 hr ago +41
But are the competent scientists allowed to do their job, and have sufficient resource to deal with any kind of situation above normal? Doesn't matter how good you are if you don't have what you need to perform
41
pegothejerk 19 hr ago +16
Also keep in mind many people are now, by design, afraid to do their jobs because bringing any attention to ones self comes with the very real risks of being fired, being doxxed, having your life threatened, and putting your family in danger. That means less will get done. Again, by design.
16
TurnkeyLurker 20 hr ago +6
They get an official printed letter that states "if you are sick, click here, otherwise disregard this letter."^/s
6
No_Stress_2534 15 hr ago +2
You forgot one major part of their monitoring plan, which is live tweet their full name before it’s been verified that it’s even the right person
2
LABoRATies 10 hr ago +2
There’s an AI watching the search results from possible infected. It reports to “dr” oz and captain road f kill if they say anything autistic. Once confirmed autistic they send Joe Rogan to hunt the sick with a bow. He pours a bottle of Tylenol on his kills to avoid suspicion.
2
iforgotmyuserr 16 hr ago +5
In that case, I’d rather them monitor the deadly outbreak with a 40% mortality rate and no vaccine that’s spreading around the world, than a disease that primarily affects brainless antivaxxers.
5
Nervous_Ad_6998 20 hr ago +9
We still have a CDC?
9
BoneZone05 20 hr ago +17
I read somewhere that it’s been renamed the *Centers for Disease ~~Control,~~ and War*
17
Kapowpow 13 hr ago +2
Center for disease war + AI
2
Xsiah 23 hr ago +11
But you don't have to start mass hysteria over one while basically ignoring the other.
11
Zerokelvin99 23 hr ago +83
One has a 40% mortality rate. Both should be monitored but it's dumb to not treat these two scenarios differently. One also has a vaccine and treatment options, the other you juste wait and see if you fall into that 40% mortality rate.
83
Xsiah 23 hr ago +13
My point is that both _aren't_ monitored. One is very much monitored, which I'm not against, but everyone is obsessed with it like it's the beginning of the end - even though because of the diligence in containing it, nothing will come of it. Meanwhile the other is an ongoing and worsening public health issue that is not only not being monitored, the person who is in charge is an active _opponent_ of the thing that would decrease the risk, but that's not a priority for the news cycle or the people glued to it.
13
Active_Public9375 22 hr ago +16
People are just jumpy after COVID. Hantavirus isn't good at jumping between people, so it likely wouldn't have mattered no matter what sort of diligence they had in containing it. But the difference is, if hantavirus was as infectious as measles, like a third of the world would die. So it makes sense to keep a sharp eye on any potential version that could spread.
16
iforgotmyuserr 16 hr ago +6
It spreads easier than they initially reported. They’ve updated it now, and “close contact” is considered being within 6 feet for 15+ minutes. Sitting a few rows down from a sick stranger on a bus is considered close contact now. They studied this virus in a 2018 outbreak. A man went to a birthday party for 90 minutes and infected 4 people sitting 2 ft away from him, and a 5th he briefly passed on the way to the bathroom. One man who caught it passed it onto 5 more people including his wife, then died. At his funeral, his wife went on to infect 9 more people. We shouldn’t be writing it off as not being infectious so early on when we don’t know much. We should also be taking all of the precautions we can before it spreads, but unfortunately the official agencies have completely dropped the ball on this.
6
Active_Public9375 14 hr ago +3
Yeah, I've read the material about the 2018 outbreak. It still reached like 34 infected total. I'm not saying it's impossible to spread it, obviously it can spread. But sustained transmission like COVID seems extremely unlikely.
3
iforgotmyuserr 14 hr ago +4
You stated that “hantavirus isn’t good at jumping between people, so it likely wouldn’t have mattered no matter what sort of diligence they had in containing it.” That makes no sense. It has been shown to have either airborne or aerosol spread with brief periods of someone being highly contagious. 9 people on the cruise (so far) have caught it from the original couple. Any sort of diligence in containing it would’ve been helpful, it’s currently spreading around the world and people are ALREADY breaking quarantine. A British man who was exposed to it was found in a bar today when he was supposed to be isolating. If we actually quarantined the ship properly in the first place, we could’ve avoided the current chaos of it spreading through the world. It’s insane that we’ve been flying them home and the CDC isn’t requiring ANY isolation for those exposed. This virus has a 40% mortality rate, there is absolutely no reason we should be responding so nonchalantly
4
megthegreatone 22 hr ago +6
There are more CDC scientists working on measles than Hantavirus right now......
6
FromLefcourt 21 hr ago +1
I'm no fan of the current public health "leaders", but if it's not being monitored, how do you know about it? How do you know how many people have had it this year? Where are you getting this data that isn't being collected and reported?
1
KereruBod 23 hr ago +19
To be fair, the media is the one to cause the hysteria. The CDC is just doing what it can. The funding is horrendous and the leadership is wack but the majority of the employees still there are heroes dedicated to science and human health despite the decay surrounding them.
19
icantbelieveit1637 1 day ago +177
Measles doesn’t have a 40% fatality rate
177
-Work_Account- 23 hr ago +169
It's highly contagious and can cause immunity amnesia, meaning you lose immunity to dieases your body was already protecting you against.
169
Empyrealist 23 hr ago +83
Hugely important, because I'm guessing that your death certificate wont read death by measles, but death by whatever measles exposure made you body forget
83
Osiris32 16 hr ago +13
Just like how most people didn't die of AIDS. They died because they got a cold and AIDS kept their immune system from fighting it off.
13
slowporc 23 hr ago +109
Measles is much more contagious.
109
Miserable-Ticket-244 23 hr ago +155
How about both. JFC when did we get to the point of which killer virus we should be tracking.
155
raptearer 23 hr ago +75
When the CDC was gutted and our head of the Department of Health cared more about ghosts of autism and eating road kill than doing a good job
75
NimbusFPV 23 hr ago +16
How dare you! While we are all safe at home with our families, RFK is out there cutting off raccoon dicks for the benefit of our country!
16
Imwhatswrongwithyou 23 hr ago +6
Don’t forget he is also drinking contaminated river water and snorting coke off of public toilets while obsessing over the sperm count of teenage boys. He truly is a natural born scientist
6
Expensive-Document41 21 hr ago +5
The way to monitor measles was to keep herd immunity up because its so goddamn infectious that there arent the resources or staff to realistically contain a runaway epidemic. Hence why the vaccine was essential and these chucklef***s who think its govt mind control or whatever are so dangerous, specifically with measles. Hanta is a few people who MAY have an extremely dangerous but not very transmissible illness where we already know who and where they are and theyre already being monitored.
5
mulletstation 23 hr ago +5
Unless you have literally endless resources and human labor this is how medicine has always been done. Like that is the term 'Triage'
5
competenthurricane 23 hr ago +11
Measles already has an effective vaccine.
11
mulletstation 23 hr ago +1
0.4x0.10 vs. 0.003x0.25
1
DeepSpaceNebulae 23 hr ago +27
Sure, but it’s also a game of numbers. This doesn’t spread very easily, well below the flu which on average only infects 1-2 other people Whereas someone with measles is likely to spread it to 12-18 people… it is insanely contagious. So while “only” 10-20% experience severe complications requiring hospitalization and a mortality rate of 0.1-0.3% you are looking at several factors more people being infected. 40% of 30 people is 12 people, but 0.1% of thousands (each of whom is very likely to spread it to more) quite quickly reaches those same casualty numbers
27
Complexology 22 hr ago +8
The R0 in the last outbreak was just over 2 in rural Argentina. So far its looking to currently be 12 in the much more dense population of a cruise ship. In the last outbreak a person who just said hello in passing got it and a person who sat at a nearby table with no contact got it. So I wouldn't say it doesn't spread very easily. Early quarantine is absolutely essential and during the last outbreak with full quaratine procedures they only managed to get the R0 to 0.98 barely enough to fizzle. So starting a narrative that these resources shouldn't be used on Hanta is insane.
8
Xsiah 23 hr ago +32
More people will die from measles than from this tiny outbreak this year.
32
icantbelieveit1637 23 hr ago +12
Ironically this single hantavirus outbreak has already killed as many people as Measles did last year (in the U.S.)
12
Xsiah 23 hr ago +19
Zero Americans have died from this outbreak. If you're going to limit the range of your data, apply it fairly across both groups.
19
Silicon_Knight 22 hr ago +5
You're misunderstanding the numbers. Given its infection rate globally there are about 1,800 deaths from measles (not including side effects and such). There are about 60–100 from HPS. Sure the "40% fatality rate" but you kinda comparing dying via an airplane crashing which is statistically lower than lightning to something that does actually happen all the time. Although the % of death may be low, the rate of incidence is very high.
5
MrJoyless 23 hr ago +7
I bet it's thousands of times more communicable than Hantavirus tho.
7
redline83 23 hr ago +6
Actually, no, it's about 7x based on R0.
6
noodleking21 23 hr ago +3
Measles estimated to cause 95,000 deaths in 2024. Hanta virus is estimated to cause 10-100k+ yearly infection, even with 59% mortality rate in America (1-15% in Europe and Asia), measles still probably cause more deaths (not to mention vastly more contagious). But I definitely agree that we should monitor both.
3
Kamakaziturtle 22 hr ago +10
We do both.
10
megthegreatone 22 hr ago +9
Fun fact: we literally are monitoring measles. They took a sledgehammer to us last year but emergency response scientists are still working hard on this.
9
malianx 18 hr ago +2
"As of May 7, 2026, 1,842 confirmed measles cases were reported in the United States in 2026." says the CDC. You just making numbers up?
2
willstr1 23 hr ago +3
Current regime is pro-measles
3
Xsiah 23 hr ago +4
The current regime needs to go on a bird watching cruise
4
Kelsusaurus 21 hr ago +3
While I agree, there are a few big reasons this is being tracked more than measles. Mainly that fact that the incubation period for measles is 10-14 days, vs 40-60 days for hanta. Likewise, fatality rate of measles is .01-.03%, while hanta is between 30-50% (in the US; less in other countries, but still much higher than measles). Lastly, there is currently no specific vaccine or antiviral treatment for hanta making it even harder to stop the spread if it does get out of hand.
3
MeatImmediate6549 23 hr ago +252
Gross oversimplifications incoming: The bit that remains unclear is what is the real R₀ of the Andes hantavirus strain that can be transmitted from person to person. COVID-19 had an R₀ of around 3. The Andes hantavirus might have an R₀ of around 1. Measles has an R₀ of 12. Measles and COVID have a similar CFR, hovering around 3% in vulnerable or low-income populations. With the net result being that we're not likely to have to lockdown to stop the spread of a hantavirus outbreak since the R₀ is low, which is good since nobody's gonna want to bother locking down since it's clear we're all just grist for some billionaire's mill anyway. Measles -- and possibly polio but whose counting? -- might have a better chance of breaking containment due to its high R₀ and low rates of vaccination in specific populations. But in the end who cares? The lads in the White House and Number 10 Downing Street will just use our bones to overcome the fertilizer shortage caused by the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and get right on with their day.
252
efilwsefililws 22 hr ago +59
There was a study of a super-spreader event from 2018 in Argentina, and pre-control-measures, the R value was estimated to be \~2. Interesting read (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2009040)
59
Rocketeer006 20 hr ago +29
2.12 to be exact
29
youkaime 23 hr ago +39
What is the word for the R 0 thing? It's how many one'd spread it too, right?
39
badastronaut7 23 hr ago +102
It’s pronounced like “R-naught”, it means how many people an infected person is likely to pass the virus on to
102
youkaime 23 hr ago +6
Gotcha thanks
6
Wiseduck5 21 hr ago +20
It’s the basic reproduction number. The naught is often used to denote initial/time zero. There’s also Re (or Rt) the effective reproduction number. How many people on average is an infected person actually infecting. In other words, what effect are control measures having. If you effectively quarantine and isolate everyone, the Re would be 0. “Flatten the curve” meant reducing the Re of COVID to 1.
20
youkaime 21 hr ago +2
Ooh good to know, thank you
2
arlu3827 23 hr ago +8
The word is R-knot, with the 0 indication the amount of transmissions stemming from one case.
8
livinglavidajudoka 22 hr ago +17
Naught. Same pronunciation. Naught means zero.
17
Catazat 21 hr ago +3
In some dialects (such as mine), "knot" and "naught" are pronounced differently.
3
HasGreatVocabulary 21 hr ago +7
r0 is contextual when the number of patients are small, during andes Epuyen outbreak the rvalue ranged from 1.4 to 6 settling at 0.97 after quarantine was put in place
7
Rocketeer006 20 hr ago +5
The R0 for Andes is 2.12
5
Fantastic_Smile9746 18 hr ago +5
Had to bring up the fertilizer, didn’t you?
5
Bitter_Concert_514 22 hr ago +3
I learned that R-0 from the movie Contagion
3
Illustrious-Dot-5052 22 hr ago +2
Jesus Christ, that last statement is the real danger 😬
2
Flash_ina_pan 1 day ago +175
K, hopefully it doesn't spread. I don't think I could stand dealing with the absolute shitbirds a national medical emergency tends to bring out, again.
175
Seastep 23 hr ago +130
Two terms. Two pandemics? I don't believe in God, but perhaps somewhere, someone is sending us a sign that we need to turn this ship around.
130
alficles 23 hr ago +56
I saw a meme recently: Trump was sent to America by God Himself! The Almighty ran out of locusts.
56
manbeardawg 23 hr ago +9
Don’t worry, I do believe in God, and this is exactly the kinda shit He found funny in Old Testament times. Just waiting for the locust plagues to confirm.
9
pchlster 22 hr ago +8
Are we gonna see RFK wave a racoon p**** about until it turns into a snake? "Pharaoh. Let my people drink raw milk."
8
SeaDots 22 hr ago +3
It's like China's "mandate of heaven" in history. Natural disasters or social unrest was seen as a sign that heaven is taking back the mandate from the current ruler.
3
pchlster 22 hr ago +9
"It appears you've caught the hanta. We're prescribing one raccoon p**** every morning to be taken orally. You know, none of this would have happened if we'd just built the ballroom."
9
After_Ad4088 17 hr ago +2
Oh I'd straight up quit. No thank you. EDIT: F*** it, I'd probably stay if they offer time and a half
2
drunkandy 23 hr ago +91
Stupid people on social media have absolutely lost their minds about hantavirus. The reaction is as though the government's response to COVID was happening with hantavirus, except it's completely happening in their heads. People are posting "Wait if this is a new virus how come they talked about it in this old episode of House?" and it's like nobody is saying it's new! People are posting themselves burning masks and insisting that they're not going to let "them" close down churches- and none of this is happening or being discussed. It's so bizarre
91
watering_a_plant 23 hr ago +39
i've noticed this shift too. not even just for "lockdowns" or whatever, but with...everything? people are so quick to react to things that are not yet happening and may not happen at all.
39
Gekokapowco 20 hr ago +14
Well its kinda like, there's a hypothetical baseline of 0.1% chance that this will even affect your life tangentially this administration, famous for its refusal to contain covid and stripping health protections and expertise, has been, at a rate of about once a week going, "we've doubled that chance" next week "we've doubled that chance" week after "we've doubled that chance" for like a year. Obviously this *should* be nothing. A small and easily contained tragedy. But there's just been constant reinforcement that the people in charge will actively make things worse as a matter of principle, so its a bit naive to settle for that 0.1% as an accurate reflection of reality.
14
Dependent_Rain_4800 21 hr ago +6
They are probably sales people from the toilet paper industry. I think you should stock up though 🧻
6
Grace_Omega 22 hr ago +53
I see we're not bothering to read the article again. >41 monitored include passengers and flight contacts with potential exposure to symptomatic case They're just monitoring people who were in contact with one person who had it. None of them are confirmed cases, and these aren't random people in the general population. Zero sign of uncontrolled spread. There's no reason to worry about this at the moment.
53
Hasler011 20 hr ago +13
Would be nice if people would post non paywalled links. I’m not paying to see a rueters article.
13
Longjumping-Panic-48 17 hr ago +2
Was it in the US where the medical team didn’t follow the appropriate protocols while treating someone in active illness and now they also have to be monitored?
2
True-Industry-4057 16 hr ago +2
No, that was in the Netherlands
2
Ritaredditonce 23 hr ago +44
Bad news all around since the administration eliminated funding for a group that had been running a pilot project aimed at studying the type of hantavirus.
44
Hokie23aa 23 hr ago +12
Did they actually? thats insane
12
PokemonTrainerWinter 22 hr ago +7
Yes yes they did… makes you wonder what else X-Files predicted
7
5kyl3r 18 hr ago +7
while not actively telling anybody to quarantine for it. i hate this timeline
7
Ok_Pollution7093 23 hr ago +37
41 people monitored is already more attention than most outbreaks get early on. Hope they stay ahead of it.
37
Niceromancer 18 hr ago +7
The same admin that decided if they stop testing for covid the number of cases would go down. Yeah nobody is going to trust anything this admin says.
7
Loose_Clock4873 1 day ago +82
Are we supposed to drink bleach yet?
82
Ok-Scar-9677 1 day ago +23
I would not put it past RFK Jr.  Hopefully he does it himself.
23
ecafsub 23 hr ago +5
Nothing like leading by example.
5
Zelnite 23 hr ago +1
Not if the raccoon d*** gets him first.
1
Largofarburn 23 hr ago +7
Get with the times, you boof it so it’s more effective.
7
nutationsf 23 hr ago +6
Absolutely do not boof bleach if you already have a uv lightbulb up there
6
sef-here 23 hr ago +5
Nah, you’re supposed to inject it.
5
SimpleDose 1 day ago +3
Stock up and wait for instructions
3
0thethethe0 23 hr ago +2
Daily perineum sunning is the only way.
2
McChibken 23 hr ago +27
If I've learned anything from the COVID pandemic, it's that if China isn't locking down, I shouldn't yet be concerned
27
SeaDots 22 hr ago +24
Ehhhh the whole thing started because China initially covered it up and didn't lockdown or contact trace while it was exploding after potluck celebrations etc. They also disappeared journalists that whistleblew that COVID was happening. But then the US was just as bad, too. Editing to add details from Google: Zhang Zhan: A former lawyer who documented overcrowded hospitals and funeral homes, she was imprisoned for "picking quarrels and provoking trouble." After completing a four-year sentence, she was reported missing again shortly after her scheduled release in May 2024, raising major alarms among rights groups. Chen Qiushi: Went missing in February 2020 after reporting from hospitals. A friend reported he was under state supervision before he resurfaced in September 2021, stating he had suffered from poor health and depression. Li Zehua: A former CCTV host who went to Wuhan, he was pursued by authorities and "disappeared" before resurfacing in April 2020, stating he had been quarantined and then released. Fang Bin: A Wuhan resident who posted videos of bodies outside a hospital. He was detained and later sentenced to three years in prison, reportedly released in April 2023.
24
UnfazedReality463 18 hr ago +6
I had no idea that the incubation period for this virus is more than a month.
6
DietOwn2695 23 hr ago +10
Wasn't one of them "mildly infected."
10
Stupid_Watergate_ 23 hr ago +20
Mildly positive 😂
20
DietOwn2695 22 hr ago +5
You're right
5
ntsp00 14 hr ago +3
There's no validated test for asymptomatic individuals and the CDC isn't following WHO guidance. They're unreliably testing people and making up terms like "mildly positive" on the fly because they know it's not a reliable result. > When asked whether the six Canadians who have returned home have been tested for hantavirus, Reimer said they haven't. > The reason for that, she said, is because **"there is no validated test for asymptomatic individuals."** > **"That means if we were to do a test on them, my biggest worry is if it came back negative, that could falsely reassure them that they're not infected when in fact we wouldn't be confident of that."** > That might cause them to take less precautions than necessary, she added. **There's also a chance that they get a false positive on the test, which could create unnecessary worry.** https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/livestory/hantavirus-questions-answered-9.7192423 They probably assumed the test would come back negative so they could use that test result to quell fears, but through their own sheer incompetence they've just created more fear with a false positive.
3
cubsgirl101 23 hr ago +5
That person is being quarantined in Nebraska and being tested again after inconclusive test results.
5
jcblueinc 12 hr ago +3
Today I wore my mask in public for the first time in 3 years. Hope we actually learned our lesson this time. We probably haven't. F*** MAGA.
3
dburr10085 23 hr ago +6
Didn’t the cdc just fire the top person?
6
ballsmigue 22 hr ago +6
Is this including ANY hantavirus case im guessing? Because i kept having people freaking out about a few articles of a few in Illinois... Who got the regular version that's been around forever and has 0 relation to the andes variant.
6
snailhair_j 11 hr ago +3
If there's anything everyone should know about this administration, it's that they are short-sighted and always behind the curve. If they say they are monitoring 41 people, then there's 410 that they should be monitoring.
3
Nervous-Tour-884 21 hr ago +4
The best thing to come out of this will be "H***** Virus".
4
ceribus_peribus 20 hr ago +6
Look how quickly things fall apart when Trump isn't around. The CDC is tracking cases again!
6
ShedTail 22 hr ago +4
"WHO says outbreak not comparable to COVID, poses no pandemic risk."
4
Cowabunguss 18 hr ago +4
USA is so f****** cooked lmfao
4
pickandpray 16 hr ago +4
So by tomorrow that unofficial number will be 250 but they won't show symptoms until the infected are closer to 5000. What a time to be alive.
4
Kamakaziturtle 22 hr ago +5
Hantavirus has been around a long time before this cruise. Cases were already monitored, the only reason this is a headline is due to recent news.
5
HolidayNothing171 23 hr ago +8
How tf did it get to 41?????
8
kittenpantzen 23 hr ago +44
This is people that are being monitored for potential signs of infection and not people that are confirmed to be infected. They are going to keep an eye on everyone who was on that ship and some of the people who had passing contact with confirmed infections until the potential incubation period has passed, and that's a fairly long incubation period.
44
HIM_Darling 22 hr ago +8
IIRC there was a group of people that disembarked the ship about a week before it was confirmed that there was a hantavirus outbreak and those people had been wandering freely around their home countries until it was confirmed. I'm guessing at least one of those was from the US and the additional people being monitored are the ones those people had prolonged contact with.
8
opposite_of_hotcakes 17 hr ago +3
41 people who potentially might have it because they were in contact with someone who was confirmed to have it. It’s not 41 confirmed cases.
3
GreatStateOfSadness 23 hr ago +5
Cruise ships are pretty big. 
5
Purplecatty 22 hr ago +9
This cruise ship only had about 200 people 
9
Kamakaziturtle 22 hr ago +3
And those people are going to be in close quarters with one another so naturally a good chunk are going to need to be monitored.
3
kittenpantzen 23 hr ago +11
The Hondius is not. 
11
c4upinhisbhole 20 hr ago +2
Why? If you don’t monitor it the virus will just go away.
2
JRR5567 20 hr ago +2
Science VS dropped a very interesting episode about Hantavirus. Check it out.
2
Sacred-Lambkin 19 hr ago +2
Don't worry, RFK will release them tomorrow to a few random high density population centers around the country. Gotta immunize the people and only such people will die from it anyway.
2
kpmsprtd 9 hr ago +3
It's unfortunate that the CDC and public health, in general, have been highly compromised. I figure we're pretty much on our own at this point.
3
AnyKangaroo8851 17 hr ago +5
I’d like to know why Governor Newsom isn’t mandating that the California Department of Public Health require the persons who were exposed to the Andes virus be quarantined, per the recommendations of WHO, instead of being “monitored.” What exactly does being monitored mean? It’s a scientific fact that this strain of hantavirus is spread human to human.
5
paint_thetown_red 23 hr ago +13
If it’s like last time this will be a non issue and everyone will be over-reacting. Right up until the point we have to shut everything down over a weekend and do a temporary 2 week quarantine for the next 3 years
13
TitleOfYourSaxTape 23 hr ago +30
> If it’s like last time this will be a non issue ... up until the point we have to shut everything dow The actual last time was the Oropouche Virus scare in 2025, which had cases pop up in the US. And before that was the H5N1 Bird Flu scare in 2024. There was also a Polio risk in Gaza, and a Marburg outbreak in Rwanda that was contained with tons of resources dedicated towards fast contact tracing and vaccinations. Most of these aren't remembered because their low risk didn't pan out and/or they were well-monitored and contained. So when you say "last time we had to shut everything down", you're specifically ignoring every virus that was successfully contained since then, and all the successful containments before then as well.
30
Kamakaziturtle 22 hr ago +2
If you are talking about virus scares, the last time this happened wasn't Covid
2
TheDoomBlade13 23 hr ago +3
This is such a nothing, don't let the media rile you up. Scientists from WHO made it clear immediately following the initial report that there is no pandemic threat because of how hard it is to transmit.
3
TheGooseFraba 18 hr ago +2
I don't give a damn what the CDC says.
2
PrincipleUnusual7244 23 hr ago +3
When they kept saying... its nothing to worry about. In this "administration" hell yeah i worried
3
hufflefox 22 hr ago +2
Which seems like sane public health. Next do measles or tuberculosis.
2
SloppyMeathole 23 hr ago +1
It's funny how they keep saying that this virus is hard to spread, but people who spend 30 seconds with infected people are testing positive. I don't think anyone trusts our current government to tell us the truth either way.
1
Little_Noodles 23 hr ago +20
The only people infected that we have details about were the original patient, his wife, and the ship medic. The others are all from the ship as well, and we have no information on their degree of contact with those other three. Nobody that’s had incidental contact off the ship in the way you’re describing has tested positive
20
kilometr 23 hr ago +11
These people aren’t confirmed to be infected they’re just being monitored cause they came in contact with someone who was.
11
cubsgirl101 23 hr ago +8
There are only 11 positive cases of Hantavirus related to the cruise ship, everyone else is being monitored for symptoms by local health authorities. These people are all notified about contact tracing because they were exposed to the virus, they are not testing positive for it.
8
Ok-Scar-9677 23 hr ago +9
Science isn't political.  There isn't any cases of incidental contact causing an infection as of yet.  You're probably referring to the flight attendant who was hospitalized, and she tested negative.
9
ntsp00 14 hr ago +2
> people who spend 30 seconds with infected people are testing positive You got a source for that or you just spewing bullshit?
2
PlanetTourist 22 hr ago +2
We still have a CDC? Neat
2
Kannazuki1985 21 hr ago +2
I am also surprised about that.
2
Outrageous-Tell1218 20 hr ago +3
Let's not over-react. Just because the last pandemic killed millions while intense public health and vaccination measures were being carried out, does not mean that the next pandemic will be as bad, especially where public health measures and vaccines are non-existent.
3
IceMysterious3056 19 hr ago +3
Why does this virus makes me feel like numbers will slowly jump up in a few weeks.
3
Shtankins01 23 hr ago +2
I'm sure some ivermectin will clear that right up, lickety split. Redneck penicillin, they calls it
2
unbanned_lol 18 hr ago +2
Lol it just keeps growing. Why did Biden do this?
2
YonderMTN 21 hr ago +1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
← Back to Board