· 197 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 18, 2026 at 5:47 PM

Charlize Theron Says ‘In 10 Years, AI Is Going to Be Able to Do’ Timothée Chalamet’s Job, but it ‘Will Not Be Able to Replace’ Live Performance Like Ballet

Posted by cmaia1503


Charlize Theron Says ‘In 10 Years, AI Is Going to Be Able to Do’ Timothée Chalamet’s Job, but it ‘Will Not Be Able to Replace’ Live Performance Like Ballet
Variety
Charlize Theron Says ‘In 10 Years, AI Is Going to Be Able to Do’ Timothée Chalamet’s Job, but it ‘Will Not Be Able to Replace’ Live Performance Like Ballet
Charlize Theron says 'in 10 years,' AI can replace Timothée Chalamet, but it 'will not be able to replace' live performance like ballet.

🚩 Report this post

197 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Conan-Da-Barbarian 1 day ago +547
Ai robot ninja ballerinas
547
ayoungsapling 23 hr ago +74
We’ve got that today. [Look at them go](https://www.listnook.com/r/therewasanattempt/s/YWOmz3SFtv), it’s beautiful
74
Ok_Story_7924 23 hr ago +19
They came out with that robot stretcher with the quickness! 🤣
19
tjtillmancoag 22 hr ago +4
Also, what about those Kungfu robots during the Chinese New Year special? https://youtu.be/NwOXRGDstXg?si=o0IxRmRZ3on0emL7
4
Putrid_Anybody_2947 23 hr ago +4
Its funny how you picked the one that crashes to self soothe. https://youtube.com/shorts/x0ecQlTJ0Bw?si=_Y3pRnUgY96Bm9HJ You will be replaced you are being replaced it is easier to use bots that dont complain. you or your children will be starved out. You ever thought about how painful it can be to starve to death. The billionaires and Curtis yarvin have written about this. Unionize ur work place.
4
Safe_Software_1640 19 hr ago +3
why is it funny that they picked the one that crashes ?
3
Putrid_Anybody_2947 19 hr ago +3
Cause robot tech has advanced a lot more than that. So the person is minimizing the danger. Also, the money isn't interested in dancing robots. It's the cute features that hide the danger. If it can dance, it can fight in close combat like a human and can shoot like a robot. That's what the money behind ai robots are interested in.
3
Final-Nebula-7049 10 hr ago +2
Robots cost too much, labor with poverty level wages will always stay
2
topscreen 22 hr ago +11
Boston Dynamics is taking this as a challenge
11
hearmymotoredheart 19 hr ago +3
Why did I think to try and sing it to the tune of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles?
3
Conan-Da-Barbarian 10 hr ago +2
What I was aiming for
2
UpsetCryptographer49 18 hr ago +2
Ai robot ninja ballerina’s vs Predator
2
WeWantMOAR 23 hr ago +5
Yeah like talk about not having a clue. Holographic projection could replace it. At a cheaper value.
5
CappnMidgetSlappr 22 hr ago +14
"Ballet's in town. Wanna go?" "Nah, sounds pretty lame." "They replaced all the dancers with kick ass robots." "On second thought..."
14
cmere-2-me 22 hr ago +6
Rich snobs will always want to see the real deal. The more expensive the better. It would only make it more exclusive. AI could introduce it to a new audience.
6
CongealedBeanKingdom 22 hr ago +9
Some not rich not snobs like to watch live performances too.
9
cmere-2-me 22 hr ago +3
Of course. My point is there will always be an audience for live performance
3
ObviouslyJoking 1 day ago +626
The real question is will the customer pay $20 to see a film entirely generated by AI with no human actors made for a small fraction of the cost of a normal film? Or to phrase it another way how stupid do they think we are?
626
Darkdragoon324 23 hr ago +368
They think we’re pretty damn stupid and honestly that assumption isn’t entirely without merit.
368
CompensationProf 23 hr ago +108
A lot of movies that will be AI generated will be animated and targeted at children
108
CountryOk6049 23 hr ago +59
AI learning openly concentrating on making content that hooks young kids as much as possible, what could possibly go wrong?!
59
Ritchie_Whyte_III 21 hr ago +14
I mean we have been doing that for decades.  Just was done by smart people and traditional algorithms instead of AI. And look at the utopia we are in! /s
14
IDKimnotascientist 23 hr ago +4
Yep. There’s about as much “art” in these live action remakes that make a billion dollars as there is in AI
4
nicdrumandbass 20 hr ago +12
I mean that’s a ridiculous statement and I hate live action remakes. There are literally thousands of artists that work on them
12
IDKimnotascientist 19 hr ago +6
You’re right, AI is worse at least those remakes employ actual humans. AI is just the next step in evolution of soulless corporate driven media
6
Resident_Course_3342 22 hr ago +22
No one has ever lost money underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
22
RadarSmith 22 hr ago +4
Really any public.
4
ehrgeiz91 23 hr ago +17
50% of the country reads at or below a 5th grade level.
17
broha89 23 hr ago +77
I absolutely believe a major proportion of movie/tv watchers couldn’t give less of a f*** if their entertainment is AI generated or not
77
nimue57 23 hr ago +20
The general public might not necessarily care if it's AI, but they sure as hell aren't going pay to watch a bunch of movies that are even shittier than the ones that are already killing the industry, which is their real problem
20
SpookiestSzn 15 hr ago +4
If they can make it good that's the metric Whether it's ai or not people won't care they'll only care if it's bad
4
Unlucky-Public-2947 23 hr ago +12
Probably but it will take a lot longer than ten years, not doxxing myself but I work in the industry and generative AI is trash, what AI is good at is post or things like complicated transitions or zooms, but it can’t create shots. Right now it’s a cross between gambling and moving a picture in word, so it’s almost here but not quite or you change one thing and this other thing also changes or moves. And each time you do costs more credits that you eventually have to buy of.
12
thatandrogirl 23 hr ago +35
I think so. When it comes to AI, the average consumer doesn’t care much about the ethics so long as the product is good enough. If studios can generate a movie that’s interesting and well-done enough, people will still pay what they’re paying now for movies with human actors/crew.
35
zeptillian 21 hr ago +6
Then why do all the movies we watch have to have high budget recognizable actors? If they can save a bunch by hiring competent no name actors and still rake in the blockbuster money, they would already be doing that right now. People want to see their favorite celebrities. They do not want AI bots.
6
pain3m 20 hr ago +6
there's gonna be favourite models for AI. Maybe even based on our "favourite celebrities"
6
iamthesam2 15 hr ago +2
you’re literally going to be able to pay extra to have AI replace the main character with your own face.
2
Troyabedinthemornin 23 hr ago +10
Problem is I don’t think AI can make something worth watching. Plus culturally a lot more people are turning against it from a taste standpoint. Once something is deemed cringe, people will keep away
10
Gluverty 21 hr ago +6
Not yet, but it is improving at a scary rate
6
sadacal 23 hr ago +12
> Problem is I don’t think AI can make something worth watching. Why not? You don't have to replace the entire process with AI. You might still have writers and animators and editors, they'd just be working with AI generated footage rather than real footage.
12
ReverendHemlock 18 hr ago +2
It’s taken like 5 years from generating doodles to short films indistinguishable to most people from the real thing. Not sure why you would believe it can *never* get the rest of the way there.
2
Hosni__Mubarak 23 hr ago +8
Not to worry. We will create robots to watch the movies. Humans can then be used as a biodegradable energy source to power the robots.
8
Gardimus 23 hr ago +4
I will have no choice since there will be no electronics for me to game on.
4
2401PenitentTangentx 23 hr ago +3
Have you ever been to the comment section on a yahoo article? That's how stupid we are.
3
fuccguppy 23 hr ago +3
I wasn't even willing to pay $20 to see the movies we have now so yeah there's no chance for me lol
3
AtomicBlastCandy 23 hr ago +3
Yes, executives think we are that dumb and they are all geniuses
3
BlessTheHour 23 hr ago +3
They think we're really damn stupid. And they're right.
3
Majestic-Ad-7713 22 hr ago +3
Where would we get 20 when ai take all our jobs
3
alhanna92 22 hr ago +3
I really would like to agree with you but unfortunately millions of people watch ai slop TikTok and YouTube channels so who knows
3
hijoshh 23 hr ago +7
You know i actually think it might be good for child actors. Everyone knows how dangerous that is for kids so we can at least do it to replace the child actors
7
Troyabedinthemornin 23 hr ago +9
Or, maybe we just put laws in place that better protects kids? Like think of all the iconic performances by child actors, an algorithm cannot replace that.
9
hijoshh 23 hr ago +7
There are laws in place. Some parents just really suck.
7
UpstairsBumble 23 hr ago +4
Yeah, but how does that make rich people more money? Think with your head.
4
Poku115 23 hr ago +2
You've already got ai defenders fully willing to buy in lol, the question is just if theres enough whales
2
AndrewH73333 23 hr ago +2
You really think people are showing up to animated films for the voice actors? People are already paying $20 for films without seeing actors because they like the story and the visuals.
2
ColdFIREBaker 23 hr ago +2
My 17yo daughter was just telling me that people are getting invested in online (I assume on some social media platform) series where animated fruit play out Love Island-style storylines. I keep seeing clips on Facebook of vertical series - original movies broken down into <3 minute clips that get people hooked on the series and then it redirects you to platforms like ReelBox where you pay/watch ads to unlock subsequent episodes. There is a ton of spicy content, vampire storylines, etc. I know those types of books are always popular, so now they're making very low budget series. The writing reminds me of popular Wattpad books. I could definitely see AI being used to churn out the type of content that's more reality TV or Wattpad stories-turned series or soap opera type of content. I'm not suggesting the AI content would be good, but there's already a lot of fully human content that's not particularly well-written or acted.
2
Islanduniverse 22 hr ago +2
At least 1/3 of the US is stupid beyond our wildest imaginations.
2
gorramfrakker 22 hr ago +2
The number 1 song recently is AI generated. So I think people don’t t really care how the product is made, they just want the finished good. It saddens me. https://www.msn.com/en-us/music/news/the-no-1-song-on-us-itunes-and-several-other-countries-is-ai-generated/ar-AA218S3T
2
20Years7Months27Dayz 21 hr ago +2
The Lion King (2019) grossed 1.6 billion worldwide. That movie, to me, is pretty close to what an AI movie would be. Just a remake that people are nostalgic about with new CGI.
2
Potential_Ice4388 21 hr ago +2
As a collective, we’re f****** stupid.
2
CuriousAttorney2518 23 hr ago +4
Yea, we have summer blockbusters for a reason lol
4
SafeKaracter 23 hr ago +3
Judging by the blockbusters , we re pretty stupid
3
BreakfastPizzaStudio 22 hr ago +3
So, so f****** stupid.
3
NotJoshLyman 23 hr ago +2
I'd say most likely, yes. The vast majority of it will probably be c***, but a small percentage is likely to be quite good. Think about all the film school kids who were never successful at breaking into the industry. They'll suddenly have the tools to realize their vision without any studio backing. Some of it is bound to be high quality.
2
_steve_rogers_ 23 hr ago +138
Why does she say Timothees job but not her job lol
138
Bondorian 23 hr ago +41
Cause her job will be gone in 5 year, duh /s
41
RedSoxFan77 23 hr ago +411
OMFG are we STILL on this shit??
411
Waddlow 21 hr ago +173
This is the most baffling "controversy" I've ever experienced. And still, he's right, ballet isn't that popular haha.
173
QueezyF 20 hr ago +93
Motherfuckers that have never seen a ballet performance in their life really came out of the woodwork for this one.
93
fredjutsu 17 hr ago +31
Reminds me of all the defenders of WNBA telling people they are misogynists for not watching, but couldn't name a single player other than Caitlin Clark.
31
Waste_Committee4406 13 hr ago +5
Bill Burr said it best. “Women failed the WNBA”
5
UrsusRenata 17 hr ago +13
I have seen a number of ballets. Every single one has been like fingernails on a chalkboard to me. Clearly I’m not alone. People have different interests and tastes, that’s what makes the world interesting.
13
Dearsmike 7 hr ago +1
Ironically it's probably the most opera and ballet has been in the news for a few decades.
1
elderlybrain 13 hr ago +5
I genuinely don't know why he got so much flak for an opinion, one that loads of guys share. It's just boring for some of us. Yes. That makes us knuckle dragging neanderthals and no we don't lose sleep over it.
5
tyleritis 22 hr ago +176
As someone else said, it’s like I’m taking crazy pills. His meaning is being almost intentionally misinterpreted so that every a****** can get attention for dunking on it.
176
gaydameron 21 hr ago +77
I honestly think her comment here about AI and acting is way more disrespectful to artists than what he said.
77
karmagod13000 20 hr ago +31
I think it’s insane that people have put Chalamet under such an intense microscope that he can’t even speak his mind clearly without everybody trying to dissect anything and everything he says
31
gassyfrenchie 19 hr ago +13
These are the same people that jumped on Chappell Roan for something that never happened and jumped on a campaign that Taylor Swift is a secret MAGA. Both campaigns were discovered to be run and operated by a bot farm and I wouldn’t be surprised if the Chalamet hate campaign is also a bot network.
13
ChampagneAbuelo 20 hr ago +35
It’s clear there was a smear campaign against him to hurt his Oscars campaign. Unfortunately, because he doesn’t seem to have any real controversies, they just had to blow the small thing up out of proportions
35
nancybyersharrington 19 hr ago +8
I don’t want to jump to conclusions about who was responsible, but damn, that was so shitty. I’m indifferent to the guy but he had an excellent performance in an excellent film, he didn’t deserve to have all this garbage thrown at him to tarnish that. And obviously someone was pretty afraid he could win on merit
8
Unlikely-Business-72 22 hr ago +24
This is where I agree with right wingers. Hollywood can be obnoxious when it comes to this sort of thing.
24
Dodo_Baron 21 hr ago +27
I mean rightwingers do the same exact shit in return
27
RejectingBoredom 22 hr ago +8
Everyone agrees with this tbf. Even some major actors
8
No_Performance8070 21 hr ago +6
I feel like being “woke” would be more popular in 2026 if it wasn’t for all the wrong people saying the right things in all the wrong ways. Being self-righteous and annoying has never helped anyone’s cause
6
fredjutsu 18 hr ago +2
why is everyone so butthurt about it? He's right, ballet and opera are absolutely dying. And Pixar already figured out how to replace ballerinas on screen, so what point is she even making?
2
GlassHeart09 23 hr ago +204
It's weird how we have so many ballet and opera supporters once he said that.
204
brokenwolf 23 hr ago +77
If he had said it six months prior I don’t think anyone would have cared. I think that comment came at the end of a little Timmy fatigue and everyone just piled on. Ballet is in his family so he knows what he’s talking about a little bit.
77
GlassHeart09 21 hr ago +29
100% Even if he didn't have the dance connection(mom?)...was he wrong? Mediums update and we've moved past these two art forms. Next thing you know people will say they've always loved cave finger painting more than 4k UHD vids?
29
nicdrumandbass 18 hr ago +4
I only watch videos in 360p for the authenticity actually
4
GlassHeart09 18 hr ago +3
Well i only bathe with river water as that is the most early form of hygiene.
3
BiblicalWhales 22 hr ago +27
Notice they all disappeared again the second this story came out of the news cycle
27
GlassHeart09 22 hr ago +26
Timee probably did more for ballet and opera visibility than anyone else in the last 100 years.
26
CathedralEngine 21 hr ago +5
But what about ticket sales?
5
GlassHeart09 21 hr ago +4
If there are as many ballet & opera lovers as there are Timee quote detractors they would be thriving? When was the last time Charlize went to the opera?
4
CinemaDork 21 hr ago +12
Yeah, I'd love for these people to submit their ticket and donation receipts. Show us that you're putting your money where your mouth is. I'm a classical musician and even I rarely buy tickets to performances because they're so expensive so much of the time. I haven't been to the symphony concert that has felt worth the money they want for a couple of seats. This is why we should have more federal and state arts funding. A lot more.
12
GlassHeart09 21 hr ago +8
At my last job my manager was a former ballerina. We had extensive conversations about her experiences as a ballerina but not once about the "content" of the art. She never once mentioned her favorite piece or suggested something. Because even for her it's not exactly "entertainment". And that's another thing...this conversation has been treating ballet and opera as a monolith like it's all or nothing. So all ballets and operas are always superior? There can be no mediocre work? If I like one piece I have to love the entire medium?
8
Molnek 20 hr ago +5
Because it's not about the "content" of ballet or opera, it's how in the zeitgeist they're things rich people go to so they'll seem cultured, just look at Frasier. It's like how Ebert was so against video games and how they'll never have the prestige of movies to be real art only the other way round.
5
fredjutsu 17 hr ago +2
I love classical music, baroque music, romantic era music. But for the life of me I cannot stay awake during a live performance. I usually only play that kind of music when my brain is engaged in some kind of work activity.
2
CinemaDork 14 hr ago +2
Try 20th or 21st century music! 😎
2
flamingdonkey 20 hr ago +4
Yeah the dumbest part about all of this is that he was absolutely correct. No one really gives a f*** about ballet as an art form. At least not compared to movies. 
4
FreemanCalavera 6 hr ago +1
Ironically he might actually have helped the mediums through his comments. The exposure is doing more for ballet and opera visibility than anyone criticizing him has done.
1
Daimakku1 20 hr ago +2
It's just like Listnook, but in real life. All these people come out and pile on someone because it's a good opportunity to be self-righteous, but in reality they don't care about whatever issue they felt insulted on.
2
baz4k6z 1 day ago +43
There appears to be a great push towards normalizing AI slop. It's like too many people massively invested in it and are getting desperate to see some profitability. How strange
43
Sea-Cupcake-2065 14 hr ago +6
Yup. Ive noticed it too Theyre losing. Iv3 seen articles saying to stop fighting it. Nah we good. Ai can SMD
6
Gold_Repair_3557 23 hr ago +88
You’d think Chalamet killed someone the way people have been going on about that comment for so long. 
88
Future_Adagio2052 21 hr ago +20
People gave him more shit then Jamie fox supporting an abuser
20
One_Lung_G 23 hr ago +17
People don’t want to watch ballet now, they expecting a resurgence in 10 years?
17
OkDentist4059 23 hr ago +96
Might be the weirdest possible take on this situation, congrats Charlize
96
broha89 1 day ago +97
Oh we’re still talking about this? Ok
97
bluerose297 23 hr ago +11
Hey, it's a slow news week
11
MapleMonstera 21 hr ago +5
Next up is 500 posts about “The Pitt” and a few thrown in about clavicular for good measure. F*** Listnook man , what happened to this place
5
Kaiisim 23 hr ago +46
He just said he doesn't want to do an art where you have to beg the public to care. He didn't say it wasn't hard. He didn't say it was worthless. He just wants to make art that is popular. Which is also why Charlize is an actor and not a dancer
46
No-Carpet3079 23 hr ago +51
This whole discussion ended up being more annoying than anything Timothée said, am i supposed to believe that everyone and their mother cares so much about ballet to the point where we need to repeat the same discussion, same arguments, a month after the fact? I mean really who gives a f*** at this point? Performative bullshit
51
HummaKavula95 23 hr ago +23
I’ve never seen a bigger case of mass virtue signaling before
23
JeanVicquemare 20 hr ago +8
What Doja Cat said applies to everybody, when she said that she just dunked on him to join in on the trend and virtue signal, and she actually doesn't know anything about ballet or opera
8
jono9898 23 hr ago +18
Nobody was talking about ballet until Tim said something so all these ballet fan celebrities should be thanking him, again it’s more people upset with Tim over his comments than the actors who are Woody Allen apologists
18
Impressive_Youth1133 1 day ago +114
This is such a ridiculous take on his words and people won't shut the Hell up about it.
114
karmagod13000 20 hr ago +7
A full month after the Oscars is kind of insane to still be making comments about it, but I thought it was insane before the Oscars. I honestly think people blew it out of proportion and if he hadn’t said it with such a arrogant voice, it probably would’ve just been forgotten altogether.
7
Redmoonsbstars1 23 hr ago +24
She is 4 weeks late for this conversation.
24
WestsideGon 21 hr ago +3
Just wait until you hear her thoughts on the Ashley Simpson lip syncing controversy!!
3
jBasutei 23 hr ago +7
Holy f*** we’re still on this?
7
cmaia1503 1 day ago +37
> When Theron was asked about the major mental challenges of her past roles, the action star said, “Dance is probably one of the hardest things I ever did. Dancers are superheroes. What they put their bodies through in complete silence.” > Interviewer Lulu Garcia-Navarro then alluded to Chalamet’s now infamous “ballet or opera” statement, to which Theron replied, “Oh, boy, I hope I run into him one day. That was a very reckless comment on an art form, two art forms, that we need to lift up constantly because, yes, they do have a hard time. But in 10 years, AI is going to be able to do Timothée’s job, but it will not be able to replace a person on a stage dancing live.” > She continued, “And we shouldn’t [expletive] on other art forms. Dance taught me discipline. It taught structure. It taught hard work. It taught me to be tough. It’s borderline abusive. There were several times that I had blood infections from blisters that just never healed. And you don’t get a day off. I’m literally talking about bleeding through your shoes. And that’s something that you have to practice every single day, the mind-set of just, you don’t give up, there’s no other option, you keep going.”
37
zeptillian 21 hr ago +22
"you don’t give up, there’s no other option, you keep going" And that's why I quit to become an actor. LOL
22
fredjutsu 17 hr ago +12
Pretty much every dancer I know has a second job that actually pays their bills lol
12
chewbaccawastrainedb 23 hr ago +12
Doesn't that mean it will also do Charlize Theron's job as well since she is also an actress? What a dumb statement.
12
C__Wayne__G 21 hr ago +6
Someone tell Charlize Theron she’s a bit late to the party on this topic.
6
Isoturius 23 hr ago +20
Ballet is a dying art. This virtue signaling shit over ballet and opera has been wild to see.
20
Daimakku1 20 hr ago +3
But it makes me feel good to attack someone for saying something true!
3
coreoYEAH 23 hr ago +13
“that we need to lift up constantly because, yes, they do have a hard time.” So, what he said yeah?
13
picknicksje85 1 day ago +19
Those Chinese robots did quite the acrobatics recently.
19
sdvneuro 23 hr ago +6
It stops being exciting to watch when it’s robots.
6
salcedoge 22 hr ago +3
So is AI actors which just makes this entire point dumb. The entire entertainment industry is at risk of it but she just choose a side here just because
3
picknicksje85 23 hr ago +4
So is ballet as it's a dying art form. JOKE JOKE \^\^ both AI movies and dancing robots are not the same as the real thing. But I expect lines to blur more if Westworld robots should become a thing.
4
cinefilestu 23 hr ago +7
Still talking about this?
7
Potential-Bird-5826 1 day ago +7
They're already experimenting with robot stunt... Err... People..., I imagine robot ballerinas are closer than she thinks 
7
MercyMe92 23 hr ago +7
Dang leave him alone already lol. I like the opera too but it wasn't that serious
7
Sutech2301 23 hr ago +7
You are a bit late to the party, gurl
7
ScaredChain4256 23 hr ago +5
Are we still on this little comment Chalamet made? Who gives a shit. Yeah Ballerinas will still be able to do it ten years from now and very few people will still go and see it. People were just waiting to turn on someone whose incredibly talented and successful; America loves seeing someone whose had it a little too good get knocked down a peg for a minute
5
Basic-Collection5416 23 hr ago +3
It’s always interesting to see who actually watches an interview and who comments on a topic based purely on the headlines they saw. 
3
Gex2-EnterTheGecko 23 hr ago +3
If AI development continues, it'll eventually be able to do everything. Thats the the whole point of AGI. Now, whether or not most people will want to consume entirely AI generated content is the important question.
3
caponewgp420 22 hr ago +3
She hasn’t seen the shit China is doing with robots. In 10 years I wouldn’t be surprised if they looked human.
3
tjtillmancoag 22 hr ago +3
As others have said, robots or even more cheaply, projections could replace live performances. The bigger question is: who would care? Who would want to watch an AI performance live or otherwise. It’s soulless and easy, what’s the point? I mean it can look pretty, but like, so what? Once it’s ubiquitous, pretty is meaningless. Human art will still have meaning, even if just in our hearts
3
LongjumpingDiver8773 21 hr ago +3
In a world where society has accepted AI as a replacement for real actors on a large scale, the standards for art and culture would have fallen so far that something like live ballet would surely be dead as well. Same with live music, theatre, etc. All real art and performance would be gone by this point.
3
Sterling_____Archer 16 hr ago +3
Nah, AI sucks. It’ll never be able to fully replace humans EDIT: this was written with AI
3
Parking_Syrup_9139 16 hr ago +3
Wait, doesn’t Charlize Theron and Timothee Chalamet have the same job. Hahaha what f****** world are we living in?!?
3
andizzzzi 15 hr ago +3
Ai won’t be able to make someone as naturally beautiful as either Charlize or Timothee though.
3
LargeAdvice1789 12 hr ago +3
No it won’t. It will get 99% of the way there, but that final 1% is the difference between humanity and machine. The human mind will ALWAYS be able to tell it’s fake. Just like how Meta will NEVER be able to replicate the oasis from ready player one. Our minds can tell it isn’t real and we reject it.
3
TeaInASkullMug 12 hr ago +3
I dont care what your ai can replicate. I aint buying your slop.
3
Bongressman 1 day ago +5
Absolutely guarantee robot ballet will be a thing.
5
Howard_Cosine 23 hr ago +9
People are still talking about this??
9
xDeathRender 23 hr ago +10
Not even picking sides with the Timmy ballet thing but she is just hilariously wrong. We are far closer to a lifeless machine being able to physically mimic human movement if not out perform it in 10 years especially on specialized task. But to get all the nuances of acting and all the emotional control and complex narratives and voice infections and soo on. If Charlize was trying to defend ballet as some holy art form she is doing a good job of accidently showing it may be one of the easiest art forms to produce non organically... Which I feel could add even more fuel to this wierd fire.
10
Suchgallbladder 1 day ago +26
Could Hollywood actors please get off this ballet bullshit? It was a smear campaign designed to cost Chalamet the Oscar. It worked. Please move on.
26
othersbeforeus 1 day ago +18
The Oscar voting had already closed by the time the comments were made, so it didn’t affect his Oscar chances. But I agree with the sentiment; I think celebrities are jumping on this controversy just to get attention. Everybody has made a ballet/opera joke in their life and what Timothee said was just not that big of a deal
18
in_animate_objects 1 day ago +10
Voting ended before it even happened. Edit: I’m not talking about his comment I’m talking about the online commentary around the comment Edit: didn’t mean to offend you & make you block me u/Suchgallbladder
10
Suchgallbladder 23 hr ago +2
It didn’t. Voting ended March 5th. Comment made February 24th.
2
Indigo903 1 day ago +11
I agree. What he said wasn’t even that bad, like maybe he could’ve worked on his phrasing but I feel like we should all be able to understand what he meant and the fact that it wasn’t that big of a deal lol
11
TheLegacies21 1 day ago +2
But Chalamet kinda cost himself the Oscar. I think when you’re that young and so obviously thirsty for it(he was EVERYWHERE) its oft-putting to the ‘establishment’
2
in_animate_objects 1 day ago +7
I agree he acted like he was entitled to an Oscar and that clearly rubbed people the wrong way.
7
thegreatredwizard 1 day ago +14
Are we still milking this story? He was trying to say he didnt want Cinema to become a dead or pretentious artwork, which Ballet absolutely is.
14
22LOVESBALL 23 hr ago +4
I feel like the uproar to all of this is proof that he was right. If Ballet was so great they wouldn’t even respond to this shit
4
puma46 23 hr ago +4
Still on the ballet thing? Get over it
4
Hi_Im_Dadbot 1 day ago +5
Ok, how about in 15 years, though?
5
[deleted] 1 day ago +6
[removed]
6
Suspicious_Hand_2194 23 hr ago +2
I feel like ai can replace live performance like ballet also. With the way that ai is advancing over the years and even months, ai can pretty much take over the entertainment industry and other industries and nobody can do a thing about it
2
Mm2k 23 hr ago +2
Way to center him out.
2
Johnny0230 23 hr ago +2
Although the controversy has gone on a bit too long and I don't think AI is that big of a threat (like everything, you have to find the right balance, otherwise it's just a technological development like CGI, etc.), you're not entirely wrong. They are live art forms.
2
Gamerxx13 23 hr ago +2
everyone saw those layoffs that just happened. companies are looking to cut costs with AI, people aren’t going to the movie theater as much, and they need to make their money. AI is gonna be a real deal for entertainment
2
Zack_410 23 hr ago +2
People still mad at him over that?
2
Limp_Huckleberry_575 22 hr ago +2
I do not like chalamet ,and his words were quite dumb but I'm I the only one who feels that insane prolonged backlash is seriously overdone . Like yes he did say dumb shit ,but are we going to headline it every day like he killed someone?
2
Coveted_AF 22 hr ago +2
It can already do Charlize’s job as she plays the same role as cold, angry woman in every movie.
2
immortalalchemist 22 hr ago +2
That’s a pretty good burn honestly lol.
2
Similar-Bother7672 22 hr ago +2
I hate when unc thinks she knows
2
thesame98 22 hr ago +2
Jesus Christ, isnt that the whole point of what Chalamet was saying, that he fears cinema becoming a dying art form and now Charlize thinks cinema is gonna a dying art form in 10 years. How are these rich celebs who can afford lavish ballets and plays such sourpusses about the mildest insult.
2
LatterTarget7 22 hr ago +2
Are people still upset about his ballet comments?
2
TillEducational2379 22 hr ago +2
I mean that’s fine but that doesn’t mean anybody is going to go to the ballet because of it.
2
Spaghettiisgoddog 22 hr ago +2
Is she saying his work is ass? 
2
Rent-A-Tard 22 hr ago +2
They took a 10-second clip of a guy being honest about market trends and turned it into a month-long advertisement for why people find the "fine arts" community exhausting.
2
Unite-Us-3403 21 hr ago +2
Is she only saying this just to get on Timmy’s nerves?
2
Movies_and_Stuff 21 hr ago +2
Virtue signaled so hard that she’s trying to replace her job with AI to prove that Ballet and Opera are better art forms.
2
GL2U22 21 hr ago +2
If even a quarter of the people who have come out vigorously defending ballet and opera actually attended these shows then Chalamet probably wouldn’t have said what he did.
2
GorganzolaVsKong 21 hr ago +2
We are still talking about this ?
2
Ryanlew1980 20 hr ago +2
Damn just keep beating up on the guy that said what most the population already thinks.
2
neomaniak 19 hr ago +2
Oh my sweet summer child
2
HotOne9364 19 hr ago +2
I don't think it's right for other actors to c*** on other actors. I know the interviewer brought him up but Theron could've just avoided it. They are all in this together.
2
QIMF 19 hr ago +2
Nah, I dont think AI ever will. Its still comically bad at doing any sort of acting that needs human emotions
2
lik3sbik3s 18 hr ago +2
In her 45 minute interview, she spent less than 10 seconds in total on this topic after the interviewer made a remark indicating his public opinion on dance (she was a professional dancer). This article and the post are pure click bate designed to insight you. To all the top comments fueling the “debate,” you’re being played.
2
Kannibelanimal1966 17 hr ago +2
Why was this technology let loose on society without regulation. It has been a negative for so many types of jobs
2
Clean_Gas2558 15 hr ago +2
Doesn't she have the same job?
2
GothmogBalrog 14 hr ago +2
We get it, ballet is an amazing art form with a long tradition. But modern ballet is culturally irrelevant. The majority of people do not go to see it. Or Opera. And even just theater, though of the 3 that has thr hughest uptake. It would be a crime if the same happened to cinema. In the west, cinema is a common uniting experience. It would be tragic for that to be lost.
2
Waste_Committee4406 13 hr ago +2
It’s crazy how every person on earth loves ballet apparently, and yet I’ve never met someone in my life who talked about the ballet they saw the night before.
2
Optimal_Lifeguard575 12 hr ago +2
Wack him again Charlize
2
blah191 12 hr ago +2
He really let his ego show with that one and I’m glad no one is letting him get away with it.
2
IceFireHawk 23 hr ago +3
Ironically cinema replaced ballet and plays
3
Risperidone- 23 hr ago +3
There still going on about this uh
3
SillyDilly0537 1 day ago +3
Well no one is gonna do AI ballet since there’s barely any market for ballet these days
3
Ok-Bar601 23 hr ago +3
Probably her job first because she’ll be unemployable.
3
Corona2789 22 hr ago +3
Theron just says shit to sound cool. She said she knew her kid was trans when they were like 2-3 years old and bragged about how she had an awesome time sleeping with some 25 year old. Now she’s going for easy brownie points getting in on this nonsense.
3
String-Tree 23 hr ago +3
Nobody gives a f*** about Ballet, Charlize. Being butthurt doesn't make Mr. Chardonnay wrong.
3
← Back to Board