· 148 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 22, 2026 at 4:19 AM

Children Aged 17 and Younger Face a Lifetime Ban on Smoking in Legislation Aiming to Create a 'Smoke-Free Generation'

Posted by Miles_the_AuDHDer


Children Aged 17 and Younger Face a Lifetime Ban on Smoking in Legislation Aiming to Create a 'Smoke-Free Generation'
People.com
Children Aged 17 and Younger Face a Lifetime Ban on Smoking in Legislation Aiming to Create a 'Smoke-Free Generation'
A landmark bill has just been passed in the U.K. Parliament that will effectively ban smoking for anyone aged 17 and younger. The legislation also limits where vaping is allowed.

🚩 Report this post

148 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
raouldukehst 14 hr ago +741
One thing that is true is that actions like this never create black markets.
741
succsforever 14 hr ago +293
The cigarette and vape black market will be the lamest black market in the history of the world
293
maxk1236 13 hr ago +124
It already exists in places that banned flavored vapes
124
Holdmybrain 13 hr ago +65
And places that raise tobacco taxes sky high. The tobacco and vape black market is thriving in Australia. It’s pretty lame, mostly consisting of firebombings over territory, but the customers are loving it!
65
moosewiththumbs 11 hr ago +14
Also great if you love overpriced American snack foods
14
stiffgordons 11 hr ago +5
Blue cheese + very spicy + Cheeto like puff things for $7.99? What’s not to like?!?
5
RabidPlaty 8 hr ago +1
We have an office in Australia and after a coworker visited and introduced me to Tim Tams I don’t know why anyone would want American snacks over what you already have there.
1
smegg23 13 hr ago +18
It’s poppin off in Australia due to fucked prices for cigs
18
CumGuzlinGutterSluts 12 hr ago +14
I definitly dont stock up on like 30 vapes when I hit the city and bring them back to my town where vapes are banned and sell them for double the price. I would never do something blatantly illegal. But I heard it can be profitable... Definitly dont do that though (hits vape)
14
power899 11 hr ago +6
Good to know CumGuzlinGutterSluts!
6
zimmix 11 hr ago +2
It already exists where they are legal but are costly due to high taxes
2
TyburnCross 14 hr ago +35
IT SMELLS LIKE A CLOUD OF BLUEBERRY LIES
35
aaegler 11 hr ago +21
It's huge in Australia. More than 50% of smokers now get their cigarettes and vapes from the not-so-secret black market. Our government still denies it's because of the constant price hikes and excessive tobacco taxes. A side effect has also been an increase in young people taking up smoking, as well as people going back to cigarettes instead of vaping. Great job government!
21
stiffgordons 11 hr ago +12
A bunch of people I know who’ve never got so much as a speeding ticket in their lives now interact with organized crime weekly and are very okay with it, too. Wait till they see how much cheaper certain alternatives to alcohol are!
12
ArchibaldMcAcherson 11 hr ago +2
Went to an old blokes house recently to buy a coffee machine off Facebook marketplace and there boxes of Manchester everywhere. Reckon there was around 30 cartons in the kitchen alone. Didn't offer me a c**** pack!
2
TheNewGildedAge 13 hr ago +9
Not only does it already exist, but it is extremely large and lucrative, on the same scale as human trafficking.
9
interesseret 12 hr ago +3
I'm actually okay with black markets and illegal dealings being for something like this, instead of human trafficking.
3
TheNewGildedAge 12 hr ago +4
You can't really separate them cleanly like that. They all feed into one another with the same organizations often doing it all. And it's never a good idea to give organized criminals more money and power. Eventually they're gonna get a foothold in something you *aren't* okay with.
4
RiPPeR69420 12 hr ago +4
You haven't come to Canada. Though the black market is more grey then black, since c**** smokes, vapes and weed are sold on Native Reservations legally as opposed to some random dude.
4
WeedstocksAlt 8 hr ago +1
It’s just the same people that are already doing the rest of black market stuff adding cigarette/vapes to their business. Huge business in Canada in the Native’s reserve. They sell black market nicotine product beside mushrooms, weed, fireworks etc.
1
The49GiantWarriors 14 hr ago +51
I don't know if it's because of high prices or vapes or some other factor, but cigarette smoking has essentially disappeared from public life in San Francisco and much of California. There is no real black market because there is no real demand.
51
Lucky-Elk-1234 12 hr ago +14
Same here in Australia. Obviously there are still a few smokers around but in general it seems to have gone out of fashion a lot. I remember as a kid being in pubs and restaurants and being surrounded by clouds of smoke lol I prefer the way it is now.
14
ThaLunatik 11 hr ago +6
I hardly see any cigarette smokers in the city here in Seattle anymore. Been that way for several years now. Chinatown is the exception - old Asian dudes definitely still be smoking. I see a few more smokers out in the suburbs as compared to the city, and quite a lot of them out in rural areas still.
6
_Mephistocrates_ 9 hr ago +7
Yes. But it also lowers the occurrences in the general population. People are less likely to risk being a criminal to pursue their vices than to just not do it.
7
Raethrean 14 hr ago +40
yeah organized crime will never arise around markets of vices that are subject to PROHIBITION
40
Svennis79 14 hr ago +32
Best thing they could do, is just each year find the absolute uncoolest, cringeworthy person possible, to be in a smoking advert for youngsters. They should use the latest slang and trends, and basically just make it so god awful amd uncomforable, that they just would never want to smoke.
32
Dramatic_Side_856 13 hr ago +7
So Elon Musk or the Bogdanoff twins, posthumously?
7
Welsh_Pirate 12 hr ago +6
Yes. Get Elon Musk to wear a broccoli haircut and mumble rap on TicTok about how he smokes 6-7 cigarettes a day while doing Fortnite dances. Nobody will ever smoke again.
6
mromutt 12 hr ago +3
How much would this campaign pay the model? Asking for myself lol. They can put my ugly fat ass on the poster smoking if it pays well. I don't really drink but I'm willing to also comsume a beer for the ad too. On the topic, why did dare always pick cool looking people to be their "drug addicts" and "drug dealers" for their materials?
3
takesthebiscuit 12 hr ago +6
But only if there are addicts to feed it, I can’t see my 5 year old son ever being exposed to smoking There may be some edge cases on the cusp of the ban, some 15 year olds that have already picked up the habit need to seek out illegal cigs when vapes are available Just don’t get this argument. Sounds like some old person argument thinking they are 16 not 36 and unaffected by the ban
6
A_wild_so-and-so 11 hr ago +2
"I can't see my child being exposed to drugs" said every parent of an addict. It's always illegal to buy illicit drugs like cocaine, and yet there are still cocaine addicts and users everywhere. This situation is even worse, since you have younger people who are banned while older people are not. There is absolutely going to be a black market for cigarettes and vapes in no time.
2
Filmyboicrispy 14 hr ago +17
Seriously. They've raised the prices so much here in Canada our black market is bigger than the legal market.
17
c2ctruck 14 hr ago +16
Same in Aus. $50 odd for legit pack of 20's vs $20 for black market. The government f'd themselves thinking they had a captive market. And of course the government blames everyone but themselves.
16
lanfordr 14 hr ago +12
I don't doubt there is a black market, but there is no doubt in my mind that there is far, far less smoking going on now than there was in the 1980s when I was growing up. We had smoking sections in restaurants and planes. Taxi drivers smoked while us kids were in the back of the cab, until my dad would get mad and make them quit. Shit was wild. Even when I first entered the job market in the early 2000s there were a lot of co-workers taking regular smoke breaks. Now I very rarely run into anyone who smokes. There are a lot of factors, but making smoking unaffordable definitely played a part.
12
Oreos_Are_Anabolic 11 hr ago +6
And yet smoking in Canada has decreased https://uwaterloo.ca/tobacco-use-canada/adult-tobacco-use/smoking-canada/historical-trends-smoking-prevalence https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/can/canada/smoking-rate-statistics
6
AggravatingJudge7092 14 hr ago +23
Who is gonna pay black market rates for some c**** ass cigarettes?
23
Oozex 14 hr ago +20
In Australia, black market smokes from Southeast Asia or China are a fraction of the cost of cigarettes sold in stores. - ~$20 for a pouch of "chop chop". - $60-80 for a pack of 25 or a pouch of tobacco.
20
Oreos_Are_Anabolic 11 hr ago +5
And yet the number of people who smoke has decreased consistently from 1990 https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/alcohol/alcohol-tobacco-other-drugs-australia/contents/drug-types/tobacco
5
AggravatingJudge7092 13 hr ago +4
Are cigarettes expensive in Australia ? Those prices sound ludicrous, where I live it costs about 3-4$ for a pack of 20 (including a 40% sin tax + cess, so about 60-66% tax)
4
W1nston1234 13 hr ago +9
Most of the decent legal government taxed ones are double the price that the last poster listed for the black market ones. So yeah they are ridiculously expensive.
9
exsnakecharmer 13 hr ago +7
In New Zealand is about $50-60 for a pack of twenties (minimum wage is $25ph for reference). Australia is worse.
7
aphroditex 13 hr ago +7
Average price for a pack of smokes in Oz is AUD 40-50 (€24.40-€30.50). Average price in Aotearoa is NZD 42-46 (€21.10-€23.20) For reference, cigs in Berlin are €9-10, London at £8.40–£13.30 (€9.66–€15.30), New York at USD 13.00–USD 14.55 (€11.06–€12.38), and Toronto at CAD 17–CAD 18 (€10.54–€11.16). Or I go down the street in the middle of nowhere and pay €5 for them, or go into Eastern europe and pay €3 or less a pack. (thank the gods i’m not a smoker, just a lover our sweet lady canna b)
7
vajrasana 14 hr ago +12
Eric Garner was murdered by the police for selling loose cigarettes, so apparently there is a market.
12
LIONEL14JESSE 14 hr ago +6
Selling untaxed loosies for a buck is very different from black market prices in a world where cigs are banned entirely
6
RhubarbAfter4008 13 hr ago +6
Do you think black market prices for cigarettes are going to be like 300 bucks a pack? They'll probably be cheaper than government taxed ones are today.
6
LtSoundwave 14 hr ago +10
Did smoking just become cool again?
10
A_wild_so-and-so 11 hr ago +5
I've seen an odd sentiment among younger people who prefer cigarettes over vaping. It seems to me that a lot of kids have been exposed to anti-vaping campaigns and "cringe" influencers who vape, and have come away thinking that cigarettes are the cooler and better way to consume nicotine.
5
ImpulseAfterthought 8 hr ago +1
Things old people do: cringe. Things the previous generation did: cringe Things your great-grandparents did: old-school cool!
1
Phoenix916 13 hr ago +2
Don't be a wise guy... give me some of those butts, yeah see?
2
MyNameCannotBeSpoken 10 hr ago +2
Better on underground markets than the supermarket
2
____DEADPOOL_______ 9 hr ago +1
A friend of mine's burger joint was next to a place that had something to do with smuggled cigarettes here in Australia. They got firebombed and my friend couldn't run his business for a couple of months and went bankrupt.
1
burundilapp 8 hr ago +1
Regardless it will significantly reduce harm in the future. Your ‘what about’ speculation cannot take that away.
1
Enzown 13 hr ago +5
Ah the old we can't reduce it by 100% so let's not reduce reduce it at all argument.
5
ux3l 14 hr ago +4
It reduces the accessibility, which will help a lot.
4
BemaJinn 12 hr ago +2
The black market is already there. Yeah, it'll get bigger, but so will the crackdowns.
2
suspicious_hyperlink 12 hr ago +2
It would still cut smoking by 90%. Kids aren’t going to use the black makers for cigarettes lol
2
Zolo49 12 hr ago +1
Or a teenage tobacco-fueled mafia.
1
Ginger-Nerd 13 hr ago +22
New Zealand did this, and then its current government under lobbying by the tobacco industry backed off it - It didn’t include vapes, so there was a readily alternative that kinda removed the appeal of a black market.
22
xXMr_PorkychopXx 13 hr ago +100
I feel like smoking and drinking are far too deeply rooted in human history to develop a smoke-free generation. That’s a large expectation imo. Their hearts in the right place though it’d be nice if less people smoked.
100
Imbendo 13 hr ago +75
US cigarette sales have dropped 70 percent since the 80s. No one thinks people will stop smoking altogether, the goal is just to reduce the amount of people smoking.
75
Cristoff13 12 hr ago +26
Fewer and fewer people will be legally allowed to smoke (and vape too I assume). The goal is to eventually completely eliminate nicotine use. It just seems like government overreach and probably won't work.
26
geek_of_nature 11 hr ago +9
I feel like they did a good job with my generation. Born in the late 90s so whatever that makes us. They rammed truly horrific anti smoking ads down our throats, and I only knew very few people to actually smoke. And those who did always came across as ashamed about it. But then it feels like they dropped the ball with it after that. I see so many people born in the 2000s on almost flaunting their smoking, like its something theyre proud of.
9
Combat_Orca 10 hr ago +6
I was born in the early 90s and plenty of people smoked growing up in their teens
6
VoDoka 11 hr ago +6
I'm not sure you understand how heavily people smoked in the post WW2 era and how much it got reduced by regulation and taxes.
6
SparkyPantsMcGee 8 hr ago +1
Even with the rise of vape usage, the smoking of tobacco with teens is still at an all time low. It was around 8% according to the CDC in 2024. I can’t find anything for 2025 from the CDC or FDA but Google says it’s 7.5% now…but I don’t trust the source. Point is I think modern hysteria over kids vaping, while valid, is way overblown. I feel like a full on ban is only going to push trends in the other direction.
1
Several-Opposite-746 14 hr ago +46
Interesting that in 20 years, 38 year olds will be getting carded to by cigarettes. p.s., as an ex-smoker, I wished cigarettes had been band before I started.
46
Imbendo 13 hr ago +10
All the stores in my area have you scan your ID no matter how old you look. Their system won’t allow the sale to go through unless an ID is scanned. Kind of funny seeing old ladies who look 85 get carded.
10
cinemachick 8 hr ago +1
Somewhat unrelated tangent: I worked in the states, and at one store you had to enter the date of birth from their license in order to sell alcohol. I was a strict rule follower so I asked for ID no matter the person's age. One time I was distracted (pandemic) and accidentally entered the license expiration date instead of the birth date. Once I hit 'enter', it completely locked out my ability to sell alcohol on that transaction. Even if I re-entered the correct date, or voided and re-scanned the item, it would not sell any alcohol. My manager ended up taking them to a different register to let them buy just the alcohol while I rang up the rest of their purchase, I felt so stupid!
1
CanadaMapleMoose 13 hr ago +5
As someone who quit for 15 years and is now smoking again ffs just ban them, I have no self control.
5
Working_Honey_7442 12 hr ago +28
I have great self control of drugs like alcohol and the occasional smoke. Why should it be illegal for me just because you don’t have self control?
28
TheFlightlessPenguin 12 hr ago +6
Well, you see, because we must sink to the lowest common denominator in all things.
6
DownwardSpirals 13 hr ago +28
Whew! Just in time! Man, I'm so glad we won that war on drugs first! # /s
28
UpsetKoalaBear 11 hr ago +3
Not being dismissive, but interested to know what the concern is here with regards to comparing this to normal drug laws? The primary addiction in cigarettes is the nicotine. No one is addicted to tar and other chemicals in cigarettes. Cigarette addiction related deaths here in the UK is ~70,000. Alcohol, which is commonly compared, is around ~10,000. We have plenty of other legal ways to consume nicotine, which are completely fine and an order of magnitude safer than cigarettes.
3
only_for_browsing 10 hr ago +2
He's being facetious. We didn't win the war on drugs, which has been terribly harmful especially to black people. This is a similar situation on the surface. To your point about addiction, the primary drug that is addictive is nicotine, but it's more than that. The behavior itself becomes addictive. The ritual of lighting up, or going for a smoke, is as addictive of not moreso than the nicotine. That's part of why quitting so hard. It's not just dropping drug use, it's a lifestyle change as well, which means losing calming or comforting rituals
2
FewInvestment8495 13 hr ago +40
People should be allowed to be destitute, addicted, or gross. I think it is ultimately wrong for others to decide what is right, moral, or beautiful for others. This path will always lead to dystopia
40
ManicTeaDrinker 10 hr ago +9
Sure, individuals should to an extent be allowed to do what they like. But billion dollar multinational companies shouldn't profit off getting people addicted to death sticks that cause a huge burden on society and our publicly funded healthcare.
9
FewInvestment8495 9 hr ago +1
That's an entirely different arguement. Why do you view companies and institutions as separate? They are so similar sometimes it's difficult to tell
1
uponuponaroun 10 hr ago +10
Does that principle extend to countries that have universal healthcare? At what point is one’s right to be destitute or self-destructive countered by the reality of others needing to foot the bill? Slippery slope, perhaps, and I’m wary of most politics of enforced respectability. But in the UK we have a straining universal healthcare system, and a degree of that strain is caused by people exercising their ‘right’ to give themselves chronic illnesses that need significant medical attention. And there are ways to make oneself destitute or gross without cigarettes. People often frame it as ‘personal freedoms’, but, especially in a country that could never grow tobacco, the only real ‘right’ being infringed on here is corporations’ ability to profit from addiction and cancer.
10
Nek0maniac 9 hr ago +3
I 100% agree with you on your points, but as you say, it is a very slippery slope. There are plenty of other things that are proven causes of severe illnesses, like alcohol or overly suggary foods & drinks. It's pretty much a never ending debate
3
FewInvestment8495 8 hr ago +1
So what would you do with a person who lived in a pot on the side of the market surrounded by dogs? I fear we should just avoid slippery slopes in general. Government shouldn't have the ability to baby people. Healthcare is either free or it isnt. Dont fool yourself by sharing the costs. I imagine a government run hospital should be run like the post office. Destined to lose money.
1
vctrmldrw 12 hr ago +6
I think it's a few thousand years too late to be thinking that humans can't collectively decide on behaviours that aren't acceptable.
6
Goldenrah 8 hr ago +1
You would have a point, if your addiction didn't interfere with other people's right for a good health. Tobacco smoke affects everyone around you.
1
salizarn 10 hr ago +4
In the UK we have free healthcare. People can do what they like in a system where they just f****** die on the street and no one gives a f*** That’s much more dystopian though isnt it?
4
soft_taco_special 9 hr ago +2
What's significantly worse than having to deal with people making poor life choices with externalities is an overly compliant bureaucratic society facing slow and inevitable and yet obviously reversible stagnation where every generation is guaranteed to be worse off than their parents. The UK has much bigger problems than smokers and part of that is the constant outlawing outlawing of anything that has even the faintest whiff of risk acceptance.
2
mprsx 12 hr ago +1
Yes, but vaping companies market and sell to kids to get them addicted with the goal of creating life long customers. So in the same way you shouldn't let 14 year olds have access to heroin, they shouldn't have access to bubble gum vape.
1
Oldiebones 14 hr ago +60
A lot of people talking about black markets, and yes this is true they’ll be around, probably for decades, in the long run if they don’t reverse course it’ll lead to it being largely wiped out. This is how generational change starts, and it will take decades.
60
theefle 13 hr ago +79
Thats how it worked in the USA with booze! We banned alcohol in the 1920s, it was a tough first decade but now we're a completely alcohol free nation! We had similar success getting rid of all marijuana, cocaine, meth and such too.
79
evilparagon 11 hr ago +2
That’s why age/generational bans are the best way to do things. When it’s so rooted in culture that it feels impossible to get rid of, the culture needs to be broken. Generation 0 still gets access to the vice they love. Generation 1 feels cheated, and maybe skirts the rules, but many others won’t care. Generation 2 has a tiny minority of people who still care, meanwhile everyone else has moved on and sees it as archaic and bad for you. Generation 3 is broken free from the culture entirely. They don’t care inherently, any people still on the banned vice are not holdovers, but are completely new users, a much more manageable problem for a society.
2
OffbeatDrizzle 10 hr ago +2
I'd argue that this is pretty immoral discrimination between adults of legal age. If they want to ban it they need to ban it outright, otherwise it's just seen as unfair. Also they need to stop being hypocritical and ban alcohol, which is far worse for society - but they won't, because they know that would be too unpopular. Literal nanny state. They won't be happy until you're sat in a box working your balls off until you're 90, eating your tomatoes and costing the NHS nothing like the perfect citizen they want you to be. No p*** or hurty words allowed. No fun allowed.
2
Winterplatypus 10 hr ago +2
It shouldn't be controversial at all, it will reduce the chance of people taking up smoking even if it doesn't eliminate smoking. Most smokers have tried to quit at some point. If you gave them a chance to go back in time and roll the dice for a 90% chance of never taking up smoking in the first place, they would jump at it. This is just giving people of the future that chance.
2
_Daedalus_ 13 hr ago +34
As a long time smoker who's struggled to quit over and over again, part of the reason they're so difficult to give up is because you can get them *everywhere*. You can walk into any gas station and get a pack of smokes no matter where you are.  I wish they'd just ban them altogether.
34
TurbulentCustomer 13 hr ago +7
It’s very easy to give in, quite unhelpful. I think in Australia they’re like $45 AUD, I don’t know what effect that’s had. But if it was $45 USD here I’d certainly be more hesitant
7
chocobowler 13 hr ago +5
Main reason I quit after 15 years of being a smoker was constant price rises due to tax increases
5
PedroFPardo 11 hr ago +2
When I was a teenager, I used to get free cigarettes from a friend whose race car was sponsored by a cigarette brand. Once the ban on race car advertising took effect, my friend's unlimited supply of free cigarettes was cut off, and that was the last time I smoked. The ban indirectly saved me from become a serious smoker.
2
surmatt 13 hr ago +2
As long as they dont allow plthem to be sold in singles or 3-pk or something. Getting it to anattractive price point, even if the unit cost went up would rob many fools of their money
2
thedigisup 12 hr ago +2
Can’t speak to the smoking rates but it’s led to a majority of cigarettes sold being black market.
2
evilparagon 11 hr ago +2
Only rather recently (last few years). This shows us that high prices work, but only to a certain extent, then the higher prices allow for black market operations to compete and dominate. While the black market has always been around, the price difference wasn’t enough for that many people to want to cross the threshold into supporting shady business, but now the legal price is so high that for many smokers, it’s just common sense to buy black market.
2
rcanhestro 8 hr ago +1
i could use that logic for anything really. Alcohol is so addictive to some, so alcohol should be banned. Betting is so addictive to some, so betting should be banned. video games are so addictive to some, so video games should be banned. p*** is so addictive to some, so p*** should be banned. and so on.
1
FerBaide 14 hr ago +11
Exactly, it’s not it will wipe cigarette use completely, but it WILL reduce it
11
fatbongo 11 hr ago +8
This was proposed in NZ along with other restrictions on tobacco purchases and vapes but the current Government overturned the legislation as they(openly admitted lol) they need the taxes from sales
8
AidenStoat 12 hr ago +12
Prohibition works every time! Don't look it up, just trust me.
12
NativeMasshole 14 hr ago +16
It's pretty ironic to watch so many countries lighten their laws on smoking cannabis while cracking down on and even trying to outright prohibit nicotine.
16
Boris_Ignatievich 10 hr ago +10
by any risk assessment of various drugs i've ever seen cannabis is way less harmful than cigs tbf, so its a pretty consistent stance if you're looking at harm reduction rather than a pure "drugs good/bad" lens
10
Reonu_ 10 hr ago +6
Based. I hate being around smokers. We need to get rid of the idea that smoking in public places is acceptable. I shouldn't be forced to breathe in your poison. And the less people who get tricked into starting to smoke, the better. I hope the same thing is done in Spain eventually.
6
notcabron 8 hr ago +1
I was about to say, try living in Spain. Every time your food is set down outside, some a****** lights up and it blows right to your table. Then when he’s done, some other a****** lights up.
1
arul20 13 hr ago +12
Yeah telling people what to do with their bodies really works well.  /s 
12
KrampyDoo 9 hr ago +4
Prohibition never, ever forever works…especially when it’s been a part of society for a couple millennia. Good luck, UK.
4
[deleted] 14 hr ago +7
[deleted]
7
Flohmaster 14 hr ago +11
Tiny difference: the prohibition took alcohol away from people who were already used or even addicted to it. This takes away from people who hopefully aren't addicted yet.
11
slimj091 13 hr ago +6
Imagine telling someone in their 30's 15 years from now that they aren't old enough to smoke.
6
adamg511 10 hr ago +2
Making it uncool would be a better solution. Have Andrew take up the habit. 
2
wiegie 14 hr ago +13
This is good news. As a nicotine addict, I support this. Yes black markets blah blah but this will reduce the overall numbers of people addicted to tobacco and nicotine.
13
history_is_my_crack 11 hr ago +4
The governemnt should not be able to dictate what people consume. If they want to harm their bodies over decades from smoking thats on them. It seems like everyone is for this stuff so long as its not something they partake in. If this is about health they should ban alcohol and high sugar content too since those also cause health issues down the road. Hell...might as well ban people from sitting in front of a computer too long as thats unhealthy. This shit is a slippery slope. I say all this as a non smoker that hates smoking. Government has no place being a nanny state dictating what people do that concerns themself.
4
cinemachick 8 hr ago +1
If an adult wants to grow, process, and smoke their own tobacco, that's one thing. It's another to allow mega-corporations to profit from getting millions of people hooked on addictive, life-threatening substances. It's the same reason you can't buy fentanyl or heroin at the grocery store, some substances are not truly safe in any dosage. Alcohol, cannabis, sugar, caffeine, etc. have safe dosage amounts, nicotine does not.
1
Equivalent_Track_133 10 hr ago +3
This sounds like prohibition all over again
3
Entire_Train7307 14 hr ago +7
yeah like that's ever going to stop people from smoking lol
7
yunus89115 13 hr ago +7
It will make it more difficult to get and that alone is likely to discourage newer users. If the penalties are financial and not incarceration that will also discourage without life altering consequences as well.
7
succsforever 14 hr ago +1
Nicotine is not like other harder drugs, it's a lame lifestyle drug. It doesn't deliver the oomph that is required for an illegal market. IT's not coke, it's not weed, so if nicotine is banned no one will pay top dollar for it I'm in the US and even here people act like vaping is a bad habit to be excused
1
everyonemr 14 hr ago +29
People have been smuggling cigarettes to avoid taxes in US for ages.
29
ta_pacific123 14 hr ago +7
This has got to be a joke lmao, smuggled cigarettes is a rounding error on a national scale (and I have known some broke-ass mfs have even been one myself)
7
succsforever 14 hr ago +7
Yes they have, I used to buy them as loosies in New York City (the place eventually got busted). But it's not about taxes, it's not about about driving to North Carolina and back. It's a ban. It's the dude at the counter who checks the ID, and says "yeah I can't sell it." That's different than saving a couple of bucks
7
CanadaMapleMoose 13 hr ago +3
Like 1/3 of all cigarettes sold in my Province of Ontario Canada are black market, as soon as you jack up the taxes the black market emerges, hell I've heard stories about people doing it with beef, gangs stealing carts of meat from Walmart in the US
3
Gamelove0I5 14 hr ago +7
The demand is already there. Take Australia as an example. The black market trade of tabbaco is widespread.
7
Filmyboicrispy 13 hr ago +5
Yep. New Zealand tried this and had to reverse it
5
QuestionableEthics42 14 hr ago +4
Exactly. The demand is already there, thats why it thrives. This is removing access to it from people who didn't have it yet anyway, so the demand isn't there. It'll stop a lot of people, which is the point.
4
Vracity 14 hr ago +3
Wrong, look at Australia.
3
imaloony8 14 hr ago +3
I hate smoking, but this ain’t going to work. The correct option is to continue to limit it in indoor public locations and businesses and tax the shit out of it.
3
EruantienAduialdraug 12 hr ago +3
This is the UK. We raised the age to buy/use niccotine products to 18 in 2007, just after we banned smoking in enclosed public and workplaces. No one affected by this new law has ever been able to legally smoke.
3
4EZKATKA7 12 hr ago +2
I support eliminating public smoking. If someone wants to ruin thier lungs with cigs thats thier choice but its so unfair that in crowded cities where we all have to take public transportation these mfers get to poison us with second hand smoke at bus stops, sidewalks, subway tunnels etc.
2
UnexpectedAnomaly 14 hr ago +5
People have effectively stopped smoking on their own so I don't see why a ban would be necessary. 20 years ago I used to see tons of people smoking and now I can't even remember the last time I saw somebody smoke a cigarette.
5
mromutt 13 hr ago +3
Yeah it's a fraction now. But nicotine usage is on the rise or actually rocketing because vapes and nicotine pouches. Why do they care about the few people actually smoking? It's not like it's in public places, no one cares people drink at home or get stoned at home.
3
Xsiah 13 hr ago +1
It's gen alpha or whatever they're calling the kids now - they've decided it's cool again and are starting it back up.
1
Alternative-Ad-1027 13 hr ago +2
The harm caused by social network for teen is worse than smoking/vaping.
2
vctrmldrw 11 hr ago +3
Yeah, being sad is definitely worse than being dead.
3
moretodolater 14 hr ago +2
I guess they just got rid of smoking then. Impressive governing 😒
2
thebarkbarkwoof 13 hr ago +2
From a health standpoint sure. But reality is that it will just turn into pot. People will be arrested, lives will be ruined. It will all be over a bad habit. It's stupid to legislate. Work on real issues! Tax the shit out of tobacco companies to pay the heathcare costs.
2
vctrmldrw 12 hr ago +3
Tobacco sales are already taxed very highly. Higher than anything else.
3
only_for_browsing 10 hr ago +1
Tax the shareholders. Raise the company tax. If they can still lobby they have too much money
1
DukeandKate 9 hr ago +1
It is unclear to me how this is a "lifelong" ban. Does this mean the age to buy cigarettes will rise each year? 16, 17, 18, 19? Here in Canada, smoking has been on steady decline. They are hard to buy, age has been raised in most provinces, they are VERY expensive, socially unexceptable and hard to even find a place to smoke. And even though cannabis is legal - it's not really a problem either. Is it really still and issue in the UK. I didn't notice it last time I visited the UK.
1
bigboss_snakee 9 hr ago +1
sounds good, doesnt work
1
mdhunter99 8 hr ago +1
Not going to work. What will work is psychological warfare. I’ve been casually drinking since I was 13 (yeah I know it’s a bad) but I got fucked up ONCE and I never touched liquor again.
1
TheNinjaDC 8 hr ago +1
I don’t like this. If you are going to ban something, it should be banned equally. Grandfathering in grandfathers just feels unequal.
1
King_James_77 8 hr ago +1
How is this going to be enforced? They’re going to make it a crime for someone under a certain age to smoke?
1
cjeremy 8 hr ago +1
this is stupid. let us f****** smoke or vape like everyone drinks alcohol and gambles.
1
notcabron 8 hr ago +1
Good. What a dumb f****** habit that annoys the shit out of people who don’t do it.
1
theHoundLivessss 8 hr ago +1
Ah, the good ol' war on drugs approach. That never backfires!
1
rcanhestro 8 hr ago +1
i give it 5 years before that law is overruled.
1
Heldpizza 7 hr ago +1
This needs to happen everywhere in the world
1
← Back to Board