· 160 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 31, 2026 at 6:30 PM

China and Pakistan present new Iran deal: Ceasefire for opening Hormuz

Posted by no_technique



🚩 Report this post

160 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
La-li-lu-le-lo86 Mar 31, 2026 +2552
During market hours? must be real then
2552
DVoteMe Mar 31, 2026 +371
SSE is closed, and Xi don't give a F about US markets.
371
DwigtGroot Mar 31, 2026 +302
That’s the point: it’s coming from a source not trying to manipulate the US markets during US market hours, so it might actually be true. 🤷‍♂️
302
Odd-Visit Apr 1, 2026 +138
Man Trump spooked you americans pretty hard. You trust foreign countries more than your own government. Additional points are gained when they don't profit themselves from market manipulation. I feel dirty writing these words. The bar is literally in hell for an american president.
138
ygduf Apr 1, 2026 +79
Not spooked, realistic. There are very few people less trustworthy than this trump administration. Have they done a single honest thing for the good of anyone not them?
79
EnlightenedApeMeat Apr 1, 2026 +2
FFS we have to listen to the leaders in Iran to get any idea about what is happening bc the US president and their spokespersons are so demonstrably untrustworthy and unreliable.
2
TakeyoThissssssssss Apr 1, 2026 +26
Tbh, American or not, believe anything that Trump and his goons said at this point is stupid.
26
DwigtGroot Apr 1, 2026 +40
He didn’t “spook” us, he just lies. Continuously. Daily. Proudly. So, um, no, whatever comes out of the WH is not credible for now.
40
b3iAAoLZOH9Y265cujFh Apr 1, 2026 +9
I'd trust a dead dog more than the President of the USA at this juncture, and I'd be completely historically justified in that stance. Sure, nothing desirable or productive is going to emanate from the dead dog, but I know anything Trump vomits out is going to be a lie.
9
E_Kristalin Apr 1, 2026 +3
Yeah, if trump posts something on twitter and a north korean propaganda outlet would say the opposite, I would have real trouble deciding who to believe.
3
futuriztic Apr 1, 2026 +5
Magastan #1
5
goddamn2fa Mar 31, 2026 +244
They want the day to end up so it looks good on the books.
244
ZackRaynor Mar 31, 2026 +29
Yeah, but it would give China a win so he’ll probably say he brokered the deal.
29
royxsong Mar 31, 2026 +23
And it’s midnight in China
23
Some_Conference2091 Apr 1, 2026 +1
I hope this works. This war is hurting everyone.
1
hangtime79 Mar 31, 2026 +243
This sounds like a "we want things to go back the way they were" type negotiation talk. I don't even think a bunch of money from China is going to change Tehran's mind.
243
Free_Possession_4482 Mar 31, 2026 +167
>Inigo Montoya: Offer me money. Count Rugen: Yes! Inigo Montoya: Power, too, promise me that. Count Rugen: All that I have and more. Please... Inigo Montoya: Offer me anything I ask for. Count Rugen: Anything you want... Inigo Montoya: I want my father back, you son of a b****! It's going to be *real hard* to walk back America killing Ali Khamenei.
167
hangtime79 Mar 31, 2026 +63
Yea...and that was just Ingio's father. We killed a lot more than just his father. This is why you really don't use decapitation attacks. This is blood in the part of the world they think about this stuff for centuries.
63
Inspector-KittyPaws Apr 1, 2026 +19
Probably his son too, there is a reason he hasn't made any appearances since he got airlifted to Russia despite being made Ayatollah.
19
Irisena Apr 1, 2026 +9
Though in the end, China still holds the biggest leverage here. Without China, Iran can stop dreaming about eventually rebuilding itself if the regime survives. So it's not just about the money China throws at Tehran in the immediate future, it's about their long term survival too. China have a say in this, and a pretty big one too.
9
Vkardash Apr 1, 2026 +13
We just keep sending more and more military out there though. I doubt these "negotiations" are going well or even happening at all. I'm seriously concerned that he truly is going to try to invade Iran
13
Sam_Fisher91 Mar 31, 2026 +1145
So Pakistan went and spoke to China and decided a ceasefire plan without including Iran or USA or Israel. Is that what it takes these days to be news to influence markets? “Pakistan's foreign minister told Axios the plan came together during his visit to Beijing on Tuesday. Asked whether he supports the new initiative, President Trump declined to comment on the specifics but told Axios the diplomacy with Iran was going well.”
1145
vonwwijk Mar 31, 2026 +895
So now Trump knows how Zelensky felt when the U.S. and Russia were negotiating a deal without Ukraine’s involvement.
895
mountearl Mar 31, 2026 +418
Did Trump even say thank you?
418
whizzie Mar 31, 2026 +104
He was wearing a suit though. Very small sleeves ( for the small hands). But a suit nevertheless.
104
connleth Mar 31, 2026 +30
Did he have any cards?
30
HalLundy Mar 31, 2026 +20
yes. before going all in he had a ten of clubs, a get well soon card and an amazon gift card.
20
Masrim Mar 31, 2026 +5
he only owns the one suit, all putin lets him wear
5
Alche1428 Mar 31, 2026 +7
Did he even had cards at all?
7
Atheist_3739 Mar 31, 2026 +5
He isn't playing with a full deck
5
Sam_Fisher91 Mar 31, 2026 +36
Atleast Putin was involved and US is involved in Russia Ukraine war. Here two non participants are declaring ceasefire plan 😂
36
Feisty-Narwhal8400 Mar 31, 2026 +4
Unfortunately, Trump is incapable of knowing how anyone feels but himself
4
trisul-108 Mar 31, 2026 +9
Not really. Trump has bitten off more than he can chew and he is looking for a way to declare victory and leave. This plan is **exactly** what he would like to see happen.
9
DVoteMe Mar 31, 2026 +6
The U.S. and China can negotiate this without IRI involvement. In fact, those two countries can unilaterally enforce peace on their respective proxies.
6
madhattr999 Apr 1, 2026 +4
are you sure America isn't Israel's proxy?
4
iconmotocbr Mar 31, 2026 +8
lol he been knowing. He just dgaf
8
Capable_Kiwi2514 Mar 31, 2026 +94
Pakistan and China have a unique relationship, so anything Pakistan does foreign policy wise will involve them considering China.  
94
DoxDoflamingo2 Mar 31, 2026 +83
which is how allies should behave, not attacking a country with no purpose or reason other than imperialism and violence and destroying your allies economies in the process, just because you can.
83
CptIskarJarak Mar 31, 2026 +44
both your and the guy you are replying to are wrong. Because Pakistan never bothered to consult China when it came to the War with Afghanistan. In the Iran case it did go to china more for heft and maybe even permission for the proposal. this is for the below reasons 1) Pakistan wants the Iran war to immediately end because Pakistan is in a very bad spot. Pakistan already has a pretty fragile relation ship with Iran. A while ago both traded missiles at each other. if the war continues Saudi will pull Pakistan in and America will want to use Pakistan as base station giving Iran more than enough reasons to bomb Pakistan. even after he Iran war ends with American victory the successive government in Iran will continue targeting Pakistan just like the Afghan situation. 2) Pakistan's hatred for Israel is well known. if Pakistan gets involved it will be on the side of Israel. The citizens are not going to look at this in any other way other than religious backstabbing. 3) Pakistan basically sucks up to China and putting a proposal that would anyway harm China puts them in a bad spot for future dealings. 4) Pakistan is literally a month away from a major energy crisis. they need the Strait open to stop any kind of riots. If riots happen then it could put the whole country in a very precarious position. Especially since the Army needs to get involved and everyone knows how that will end. In short this Iran war dragging out puts in a major mess. This is one of the situations where the advantages of geography meets the disadvantage of decades long shitty governance.
44
UpsetKoalaBear Mar 31, 2026 +12
> Pakistan's hatred for Israel is well known. if Pakistan gets involved it will be on the side of Israel. The citizens are not going to look at this in any other way other than religious backstabbing. The government literally doesn’t recognise Israel. There is zero chance the Pakistani military or government would openly side with Israel. They will get involved on the side of is the US/Saudi, if they do. With that said, Pakistanis support Saudi. So most likely, the government will spin it as some Sunni/Shia issue and they’re supporting Saudi. > Pakistan basically sucks up to China and putting a proposal that would anyway harm China puts them in a bad spot for future dealings. Pakistan sucks up to both China and the US. It’s one of the reasons the Iran-Pakistan pipeline to bring over gas from Iran has stalled. They fear sanctions from the US, despite the fact that China would want it because it makes their access easier. They are sandwiched between both geopolitically. Currently they’re trying to use the Trump admin to boost their favours from the US (they nominated him for the Nobel prize last year lol). Pakistan will most assuredly ask for concessions from the US for helping to mediate this. Like any sanctions for the Iran-Pakistan pipeline being wavered or whatever else. Pakistan is also weary because, if Iran gets overthrown, they are probably next. They’re the only other “nonaligned” nation in the area. Except, they’re nuclear armed. The US already has stated that they’re the other main threat next to Russia, North Korea and Iran. If there’s a huge civil unrest due to Iran’s situation, and refugees/terrorists crossing the borders, it will most assuredly be a pretext for the US to “secure” Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. There are several Pakistani Shia militant groups whose support will be affected by Iran’s collapse and they will probably be heading back.
12
CptIskarJarak Mar 31, 2026 +19
You cannot call Pakistan non aligned when they were literally the staging ground for Afghanistan. Aligning with 2 major powers doesn't make them non aligned. It makes them multi alignment. Non- alignment means not aligning with any major Power's interest. India is a true Non aligned nation. " They will get involved on the side of is the US/Saudi, if they do." -So who's Side is Israel on?
19
DoxDoflamingo2 Mar 31, 2026 +5
You've been so brainwashed by your own media that you think the entire world revolves around conflict because this is how they justify the insane military spending. We live in a globalized world and EVERYONE, will be affected by what is happening, even oil producing countries, because we import and export a lot of materials. So yes, no one benefits from this, and even countries who arent aligned with the US interventionism, like China, Russia, NK, Iran, Brazil, etc. dont want the US economy to implode, why?, because of globalization, any harsh recession in the US will cause ripples to every other economy worldwide. Anyone with a brain can see the position in which Trump and Israel have put the US right now, either they back down and have to give concessions to Iran on almost everything and lose their presence in the region, or they continue and destroy the world by creating a massive crisis in the middle east, removing a huge portion not only of oil but also natural gas which is required in many different fields beyond just energy and most importantly, destroying their allies economies for no reason at all when they already had negotiated a favorable agreement with Iran, since no one in their right mind wants what is happening right now, only the insane people who, spoiler alert, are the aggressors in this instance. Why is China negotiating?, because thats how things should be done, with diplomacy and using economic ties as motivation, not conditioning submission and servitude with death and destruction.
5
CptIskarJarak Mar 31, 2026 +20
your response to my comment does not make any sense. I am talking about the situation Pakistan is in and why they are doing what they are doing and you are talking about Me being brainwashed, Globalization, US economy, and everything else that is not related to my comment. So I am going to assume you are bot. My first bot in the wild that I recognized.
20
ReddFro Mar 31, 2026 +9
Well Trump is a narcissist, so any plan he didn’t come up with (or is able to pretend he did) he’s almost certain to decline. However, he may come up with his own plan for a cease fire and the straight opening up 24 hrs from now thats definitely completely unrelated despite being essentially identical aside from some minor tweak(s) that he can claim are super important.
9
ghost-child Apr 1, 2026 +4
This is actually a solid prediction. If the ceasefire deal does go through, this is almost certainly how it would happen
4
Justame13 Mar 31, 2026 +4
The problem is if they say Iran then Israel will figure out who in Iran and kill them
4
Marco0798 Mar 31, 2026 +9
Isreal doesn’t have influence beyond telling the US what to do.
9
BlueSkyToday Mar 31, 2026 +4
Highly unlikely that Pakistan took this step without consultation with the US. The US wants to 'Declare Victory and Go Home', as the Vietnam era saying goes. And it's always been clear that China is much more dependent on ME petroleum than the US. China is reported to have ~1.2 billion barrels in reserve, but they're not going to sit back and do nothing. This war is a gift to China in terms of increasing its already very significant political and economic power. Pakistan, India, and China all have beefs with each other. There's a history of military conflict. And this war puts all three players in a position to benefit. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
4
Think_Monk_9879 Mar 31, 2026 +28
If china gets a ceasefire then trunp deserves the Nobel peace prize
28
--TheCity-- Mar 31, 2026 +11
FR doesn't the one who created the situation get some of the credit too?
11
Darkone539 Mar 31, 2026 +8
>So Pakistan went and spoke to China and decided a ceasefire plan without including Iran or USA or Israel. Iran and Pakistan are talking, China is providing them intel. The odd one it is America.
8
petsruletheworld2021 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Not only that but there was a meeting in Pakistan on the weekend attended by Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Saudi’s and Malaysia apparently with Indonesia listening in.
2
yaboonabi Mar 31, 2026 +7
Diplomacy? In this day and age? 
7
idenkov Mar 31, 2026 +9
Let me translate this for you. China and Pakistan spoke with Iran and all three agreed they can pay for oil in chinese yuan if there is no ceasefire. You don't need US and Israel for that as this will be the end of the US petrodollar - US debt will become very expensive and the dollar will collapase.
9
BrainExpensive8916 Apr 1, 2026 +5
The petrodollar makes up a small portion of the trade in US dollars ( less than one day of yearly world trade volume). The Hormuz trade is 20% of that.
5
moan_of_the_arc Apr 1, 2026 +2
I also have a peace plan, someone get me Trump, Khamenie and Bibi on a conference call please. /s
2
HarEr89 Mar 31, 2026 +362
Everyone comes up with new "potential Iran deals" during market hours. Hilarious. Let's see what nonsense will be announced tomorrow.
362
Nick_Gilberts_Bowtie Mar 31, 2026 +38
Very timely announcement lol
38
SinisterCheese Mar 31, 2026 +11
Other than Sunday, it is always market hour somewhere. Australian and London Metal Exchange fills the gap that would happen around 22-00 UTC. I don't know why that seems so weird to me. I live in Finland so it isn't like the concept of "significant shit happens according to other people's hours" is new to me.
11
n0x103 Mar 31, 2026 +163
China probably wants to win the coveted FIFA peace price
163
Hypnoti_q Mar 31, 2026 +28
Imagine it happening, how mad would trump get
28
Enelson4275 Apr 1, 2026 +7
Iran should demand Trump regift his to them
7
ilikedmatrixiv Apr 1, 2026 +2
> China probably wants to win the coveted FIFA peace price You mean the covfefeted FIFA peace price?
2
Sea-Witness-2746 Mar 31, 2026 +116
Doesn't Pakistan have a mutual defense pact with Saudi Arabia? Before the war Pakistan kept saying if the Saudis were attacked Pakistan would destroy the attackers. The plan also excludes Israel's security which is one of the reasons for the war.
116
Thurak0 Mar 31, 2026 +23
> defense It has become very muddy, 2022 with Belarus at the latest, but also during the Israel/Iran strikes last year, but usually/formally allowing planes to use your air space and/or military bases makes a nation co-belligerent. It kind of hard to say they are neutral and attacked by Iran completely unprovoked. So Saudi Arabia claiming Iranian attacks and invoking the defensive pact will need more than has happened. Iran/Pakistan have a land border, so for Pakistan to actually do something they will demand Saudi Support in that area, I would assume.
23
TreatAffectionate453 Mar 31, 2026 +12
Saudi Arabia originally prohibited the US from using its airspace and military bases to attack Iran. That's why the US initially launched strikes from their aircraft carriers. Saudi Arabia only reversed its stance after Iran attacked its infrastructure. Per international law - which the defense pact is probably based on - Saudi Arabia was neutral when Iran first attacked it. Saudi Arabia allowing the US to use its airspace to execute an illegal war after it was attacked does muddy the issue if they try to invoke the pact for subsequent attacks, but they'd have a legitimate claim if they had invoked it in response to the initial attacks. At least, that's what I've surmised based on my limited understanding and readings on the matter.
12
Wooden-Variety175 Mar 31, 2026 +7
Yes but I think theyre not happy with saudi arabia since they didnt help Pakistan when Afghanistan attacked them i think that started right before Iran? I know its still ongoing
7
TreatAffectionate453 Mar 31, 2026 +4
Pakistan started the war with Afghanistan by launchibg airstrikes into Afghanistan's Nangarhar, Paktika, and Khost provinces. Those strikes were in response Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) terrorist attacks and were allegedly targeting their camps. However, those strikes still make Pakistan the aggressor since Afghanistan didn't sanction those attacks and nation's can't unilaterally take military action within their neighbor's borders.
4
no_technique Mar 31, 2026 +568
This would honestly be pretty embarrassing for the U.S. if China ends up leading these negotiations. That’s a huge shift from where we used to be on the world stage. At the very least, it should be a wake-up call. If other countries are stepping in and being seen as more effective at de-escalating conflicts that directly impact us, that says a lot about how far we’ve slipped.
568
ResortClear730 Mar 31, 2026 +149
I thought it kinda made sense for China to be leading. They are a key ally of Iran while also have diplomatic relations with the US. Seems like both sides need someone they can directly talk to if the war is to ever end.
149
Mechasteel Apr 1, 2026 +26
China also has a huge interest in peace. Well, in the oil that's stuck on the wrong side of the strait, but peace is the likeliest way to get it flowing again.
26
BackgroundSpell6623 Apr 1, 2026 +6
Iran has a trade deficit with China. The amount of oil they get from Iran is like a small coupon, a nice but not must have.
6
call-the-wizards Mar 31, 2026 +42
It's not unusual at all for 3rd countries to mediate peace agreements. Norway helped negotiate the 1993 Oslo Accords for instance.
42
Khadgar1701 Mar 31, 2026 +6
Yeah, but how do you negotiate with the US if Trump's word is as dependable as Putin's? Who can trust anything he agrees to if he changes his mind two days later?
6
Jared000007 Mar 31, 2026 +160
How would it be embarrassing? China is a key ally of Tehran so of course they are gonna listen to them more and be more lenient on terms
160
Infamous-Mixture-605 Mar 31, 2026 +4
China also has good ties with the various Gulf States.  
4
Pockydo Mar 31, 2026 +116
We started the war Then needed daddy to come fix it. Shows the US especially trump is weak
116
AF2005 Mar 31, 2026 +13
He’s a frail old man, it’s laughable they still try to pretend he’s in great health and not decomposing in front of our eyes. All while his brains turn to oatmeal
13
AdmirableParfait3960 Mar 31, 2026 +13
Having their most powerful ally convince them to surrender isn’t really that terrible…?
13
TranslatorTough8977 Mar 31, 2026 +58
They aren’t surrendering. The U.S. is considering leaving in defeat
58
kye-qatxd-9156 Mar 31, 2026 +17
No, it makes the *US* look weak. The USA wants to “might is right” its way rn. Its not that terrible, unless youre the regime that’s beating its chest trying to be top dog
17
Intelligent_Sky_7081 Mar 31, 2026 +7
Hilarious you think iran is going to surrender. This isn't victory for the US lmao
7
zoopz Mar 31, 2026 +6
Of course. Yes, the rest of the world understands politics. Trump does not.
6
Unfair_Surprise_6022 Mar 31, 2026 +5
Because Trump was chest thumping about America being on top, and keeping China in it's place. Suddenly China has to come in and separate two warring nations, much like a parent or teaching with two troublesome teens. That's pretty sad for the US.
5
sarges_12gauge Mar 31, 2026 +6
Does that make this an embarrassment for China if their deal isn’t accepted? That’d be pretty sad for them right? I don’t think they are particularly in that role, but you should be careful of immediately lauding them before you even see if it leads to anything lol
6
obvilious Mar 31, 2026 -1
Damage is already done. US can’t negotiate anymore.
-1
sarges_12gauge Mar 31, 2026 +8
That’s not the point of either comment. I think China is pretty irrelevant to this conflict at the moment, but you can’t believe that them brokering a peace deal is evidence of strength and not believe that failing to get their ally Iran to agree on something not be evidence of weakness by that same thought process And their success or failure on that front hasn’t happened yet in either direction so either conclusion would be premature anyways
8
Jackadullboy99 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Why does US need to lead? Would you really want it to in its current state?
10
oxxcccxxo Mar 31, 2026 +3
The wake up call was in 2016 my friend. The United States is on a declining trajectory at warp speed under this administration.
3
jellyhessman Mar 31, 2026 +8
Do you... Think the US has any diplomatic capablity left at all? Your ambassadors have been openly hostile to the governments of your closest allies. Your government has publicly and repeatedly shown open contempt for the sacrifice and hard work of your allies. Your government has waged a trade war against the entire Earth for reasons unknown besides open corruption. I know it's hard for Americans to conceptualize, but the US as world leaders of anything is dead and gone. Forever. You got too greedy, too complacent, and you ruined it.
8
TriXter69 Mar 31, 2026 +18
The reputation of the US has already been completely ruined. You'd be hard-pressed to find people outside the US who actually have a favourable opinion of them, even in allied countries
18
no_technique Mar 31, 2026 +5
Plenty of people in the US are embarrassed at the US right now. Those of us who aren't in the cult have seen the decline in real time.
5
moonsugarcornflakes Apr 1, 2026 +8
As a non American, I consider all Americans to be culpable. The Democratic party is a right wing, capitalist party that abandoned the working class and directly created the conditions that led to Donald Trump. He is your president just as much as any Republican's. You are all to blame.
8
Sportslegend Apr 1, 2026 +2
It's been pretty embarrassing for 10 years already
2
mignonhow Mar 31, 2026 +4
I mean hard to have credibility in leading any peace negotiations when you start the war and constantly violate your own promises to de-escalation by targeting civilian infrastructure, leaders, etc. Third party negotiations are standard.
4
imaginary_num6er Mar 31, 2026 +3
The U.S. has nothing left to be embarrassed about. The only thing that matters is if China will enforce the ceasefire against the U.S.
3
Intrepid_Egg_7722 Mar 31, 2026 +5
>if China will enforce the ceasefire against the U.S. How exactly would they enforce a ceasefire against the US? They don't have the means or an appetite to shoot down US aircraft in the region or force economic pain onto the US that would be costlier than compliance. For a ceasefire to work, Iran and the US need to be on board. No signs indicate we are there yet.
5
Sardin Mar 31, 2026 +3
iran already voted for a toll system where ships that want to pass have to pay toll in chinese yuan instead of dollar
3
Underbadger Mar 31, 2026 +2
Given that Iran is currently charging tolls for boats through the Strait payable in Chinese Yuan, it's pretty clear where the power lies right now.
2
doglywolf Mar 31, 2026 +2
I mean you can't shift to being an isolationist - shit on all your allies - close your borders - shut down trade - then complain how you dont have global standing anymore. It like the guy moving to the woods complaining he doesnt get a say in city politics lol
2
Mediocre_Comedian739 Mar 31, 2026 +1
Trump begged China to help with the strait in one of his first posts telling others to fix his mess.
1
watch_out_4_snakes Mar 31, 2026 +1
I don’t think its embarrassing anymore. Every single serious person already knows Trump is a f****** dumbass who only cares about himself.
1
therealallpro Mar 31, 2026 +1
This is the problem with Trump not understanding how the leverage of working with others. Having Europe on board with you gives you overwhelming leverage but they knew the hazards which is why they stay behind. Can wait until Trump is gone and we get a more rational leader.
1
shauniexx Mar 31, 2026 +1
It's giving Suez Crisis
1
MakoSmiler Mar 31, 2026 +1
Trump has destroyed the credibility of the US with the entire world. Get ready for more embarrassment over the next 3 years.
1
halmyradov Mar 31, 2026 +1
> seen as more effective at de-escalating conflicts that directly impact us Two things, impacts us makes it sound like USA is the victim lol and Iran would rather give the "well done" point to anyone but USA
1
boturboegt Mar 31, 2026 +39
I think we all know the end result. We will have done all this damage, spent billions etc and wind up with something even less beneficial for the US than the original deal Obama worked out with Iran.
39
AzonIc1981 Apr 1, 2026 +11
Don’t forget further alienated the western world against US/Trump
11
giboauja Mar 31, 2026 +23
Me and my friend Ted were shooting the sht yesterday and our new peace deal between Russia and Ukraine is really gonna get traction.
23
SidewaysFancyPrance Mar 31, 2026 +62
Trump must be thrilled that some adults are finally willing to wade into this shitshow to clean it up for him. But how will his ego handle being told to leave, and not on his own terms?
62
Thagyr Mar 31, 2026 +18
He's been whinging nonstop for someone to come help. But if China comes in Trump can't use it as a reason to b**** about EU and NATO, the usual sore spots. Can't wait for the truth social rant.
18
DARKKRAKEN Mar 31, 2026 +28
The U.S needs a off-ramp.... F****** take it Trump. You just know he won't though.
28
--TheCity-- Mar 31, 2026 +2
Yea because the obviously intelligent thing to do now is get ASAP. So no.
2
realKevinNash Mar 31, 2026 +6
Thats a new deal?
6
CryptoThroway8205 Mar 31, 2026 +4
🇨🇳👀 thumbnail image
4
isekai_cheese Mar 31, 2026 +21
*\*sends drones and ammo\** pls stop war
21
fec2245 Mar 31, 2026 +2
China wants this war to end, they're far from immune to oil and LNG prices.
2
Hangry_Howie Mar 31, 2026 +9
But if China can't stop Israel from bombing, is there even an actual deal?
9
ch4ppi_revived Apr 1, 2026 +3
I suppose it is more about stopping bombing oil economic infrastructure around.
3
Glittering-Quote-635 Mar 31, 2026 +12
Lets see how Iran reacts.. I suspect Iran wants this to go on a bit longer to prove a point. Trump can still somewhat walk away and declare it a win, Iran needs it to be a solid L.
12
JBru_92 Mar 31, 2026 +35
Both countries are going to walk away from this in worse positions than when it started, and both will declare victory. The markets will still love it somehow.
35
Glittering-Quote-635 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Well, thats true.. However, Iran needs to make sure this doesnt happen again in the future. They cant/wont be signing anything that takes away their ability to build drones and missiles at a large scale, and I doubt anything on their Nuclear program either. If that ends up being the case, its a solid L for the U.S./Israel, and a big W for Iran. That W comes with a huge price though, cratered economy and infrastructure that will take years to rebuild. So, yeh, no one comes out looking good here..
10
JBru_92 Mar 31, 2026 +20
I wouldn't say it's a W for Iran in anything other than propaganda. Getting your entire leadership killed, your entire air defense system and most of your military infrastructure destroyed, and almost your entire navy sunk would be just about the biggest L a country could take. They've proven to have a lot of resolve and the ability to wage asymmetric warfare but Israel and the U.S. very easily destroyed a lot of their shit. I think the one point of contention that is going to keep this dragging on for months is the nuclear program. They could have prevented all of this by giving up the uranium enrichment, but it's clearly viewed as an existential thing by Iran so I doubt they will ever give it up.
20
Ambitious-Wind9838 Mar 31, 2026 +16
Israel is guaranteed to attack again if Iran manages to restore its nuclear program.
16
JBru_92 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Almost surely, yes. It's the only rational action from their POV.
10
jqman69 Mar 31, 2026 +7
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/17/us/politics/us-iran-nuclear-talks.html?smid=url-share This was a month ago before Israeli attack "Three Iranian officials familiar with the talks said that Iran had indicated a willingness to suspend nuclear enrichment for three to five years — which would cover the duration of Mr. Trump’s presidency — and then join a regional consortium for civilian grade enrichment. Iran would also dilute its stockpile of uranium on its own soil in the presence of international inspectors. In exchange, Iran has demanded that the United States lift financial and banking sanctions and the embargo on its oil sales." Also this "Last year, U.S. and Iranian officials tried to negotiate a nuclear deal that would end the sanctions, but Israel launched a military campaign against the Iranian nuclear program as the talks were underway, leading to a 12-day war between the two countries." Guess exactly what happened again over a late Friday night that kick started this war. They did it last year and did it again recently and they absolutely will in the future. Israel doesn't want their perceived threat to go away. Twice Iran and US come close and twice Israel bombs them
7
JBru_92 Mar 31, 2026 +10
Israel wants their nuclear enrichment capacity to be completely eradicated. From their POV as long as Iran even has the capability to enrich to bomb grade in a short window, they're an existential threat. Trump just wanted a political win, I honestly think he just didn't like that the JCPOA was negotiated by Obama and wanted the credit.
10
jqman69 Mar 31, 2026 +8
Short window? Iran has been weeks from a nuclear weapon for how many years now? https://youtu.be/V9k_IvboV4s?si=yTZ2ZyOKlVdkGsvq
8
Astralsketch Mar 31, 2026 +6
Israel is guaranteed to attack even if they don't have any nuclear...
6
Glittering-Quote-635 Mar 31, 2026 +5
It's a W in the sense that Iran has shown that Israel and the U.S. just can't exert their will on the country. I really doubt the U.S. will be supporting ANY strikes on Iran again for a generation after this shit show. So, they gain a bit of legitamacy, albeit at a super high cost. In the end though, it may gurantee the survival of the regime for a long time, and it will prove to themselves that doubling down on Ballistic Missiles and Drones is the winning hand. They wont bother with a Navy and AF in the future, just more missiles and drones..
5
Skeeter_206 Mar 31, 2026 +2
They are still slinging rockets and drones on a daily basis, "most" of their military infrastructure is untouched as it's hidden inside mountains. I know you're not serious though because you're talking about uranium enrichment which their leader(who was killed in the opening attacks) was fundamentally against nuclear weapons and the guy who took over is not. So if the US cared about nuclear enrichment they probably shouldn't have killed the one guy who prevented enrichment to hit weapon grade levels.
2
Dispator Mar 31, 2026 +3
Yup if they are able to make nukes/icbm with security guarentees (which seems possible) then it's a huge W for Iran. Will take time to rebuilt but they will get what they never dreamed. If course itll be a L for usa/trump/isreal but trump can declare victory and his people will believe it. 
3
Crazy-Ad5914 Mar 31, 2026 +13
Trump can walk away and call it a win, but only maga supporters will believe that. 
13
ptmck Mar 31, 2026 +7
That's all that matters to trump as long he hears people whispering in his ear how great he is. The world can burn otherwise.
7
RainbowStreetfood Mar 31, 2026 +1
Trump might be done with Iran but I highly doubt Iran is done with Trump.
1
TobiSmith25 Mar 31, 2026 +4
Wonder if Trump said thank you
4
beefstake Apr 1, 2026 +2
If that deal is real the US should take it immediately, that is the best deal they are going to get. I'm surprised there is no sanctions relief demanded, I would have thought that the bare minimum to them to agree to relinquish their biggest leverage.
2
1-randomonium Apr 1, 2026 +2
It's a simple enough trade, but not enough 'wins' for Trump to brag to MAGA about.
2
boogi3woogie Mar 31, 2026 +5
Iran’s handler spoke Woof
5
HT_redux Mar 31, 2026 +3
China and Pakistan are the countries that are actually negotiating with Iran. The pedo and his terrorist regime want to take the credit.
3
stickeeBit Apr 1, 2026 +4
and immediate change of name to Strait of Epstein
4
KindnessComesBack2U Mar 31, 2026 +3
What a timeline. China is helping negotiate a deal between Iran and the US and helping trump extricate himself from a disaster of his own making. Demanding other countries help him despite getting no coalition, and giving no warning of his abominable decision. Jeezus effing christ, trump is such a buffoon. Such a moron. Such an embarrassment. I know what you’re all going to say…yes, I’m being too kind.
3
serpenta Mar 31, 2026 +4
Winnie the Pooh handles the situation, as Piglet squeels and throws tantrums.
4
Negative-Start9414 Mar 31, 2026 +3
Trump raped children. 
3
HoboCopTD4W Mar 31, 2026 +2
Take the damn deal Donny
2
yassssssirrr Mar 31, 2026 +1
Here I am rooting for China for the save. Pls save us from Trumps stupidity and selfishness.
1
Exotic-West3751 Mar 31, 2026 +2
Only Pakistan can save the world!!
2
KAKYBAC Mar 31, 2026 +3
If this is the start of the end, then Iran won the war.
3
GuttiG Mar 31, 2026 +1
I assume this is why the markets soared?
1
Dispator Mar 31, 2026 +1
If they took this deal then Iran would be wayyy better off than before and could make nukes/icbm with guaranteed security. Lol
1
Extension-Pick8310 Mar 31, 2026 +1
But what about regime change?
1
abittooambitious Mar 31, 2026 +1
It’d probably needs to come with weapons guarantees so they don’t easily get attacked again.
1
Spright91 Mar 31, 2026 +1
I reckon China already got what they wanted. The end of the US security system and international solar customers. Any more damage is detrimental to them. They would probably be quite pleased for it to stop here.
1
ReggieCorneus Mar 31, 2026 +1
Can't happen. Trump needs a victory to get out of it. Exactly like Putin, the one leader he admires the most.
1
Bikrdude Mar 31, 2026 +1
But china and pakistan are not firing anything. How can they present a deal?
1
Awkward-Candle-4977 Mar 31, 2026 +2
They are mediators
2
Awkward-Candle-4977 Mar 31, 2026 +1
Donald will say it's something that joe couldn't
1
ogpterodactyl Mar 31, 2026 +1
I mean this is where we need to get to.
1
butchudidit Apr 1, 2026 +1
Petrodollar is fuct
1
evoc2911 Apr 1, 2026 +1
I think this just jeopardize the big Trump announcement planned for today...
1
← Back to Board