The barest of minimum statements.
"We agree that we don't want to spend money needlessly."
Yes, I'm sure. And water is wet.
If this is all the administration has to share with the public, then talks must be going pretty rough.
245
therealallpro13 hr ago
+49
There’s a world where Iran charges US ships and not Chinese so yes I would say this matters
49
Aggressive_Lie_444610 hr ago
+5
There’s a world where Iran charges US ships and not Chinese so yes I would say this matters
China would never agree to any type of toll because it sets a dangerous precedent.
Now if Iran is allowed to toll a natural waterway, what stops Djibouti and Yemen from doing the same to the Bab el Mandeb, Spain, UK and Morocco to the Strait of Gibraltar, Singapore and Indonesia to the Malacca and Singapore Straits and Indonesia to the other straits amongst its islands like the Sunda Strait?
Ditto Denmark and Sweden to the Baltic Strait, Britain and France to the Strait of Dover and in future, Canada and the US to the North-West Passage??
Some of the above are even narrower than the Strait of Hormuz.
And they also become selective like Iran, for example exempting the ships of allies while everyone else has to pay a toll.
China knows that. Even If Singapore said it would not do it (now), normalize what Iran is doing and all of a sudden, 60% of Chinese trade is going through multiple tolls because the precedent has been set and normalize.
5
seven_worth7 hr ago
+3
I don't think there a world where Singapore would put a toll lmao. reminder Malacca Strait is the most efficient strait for ship, not the only strait available. Ship could either goes around Indonesia instead or stop at Malaysia(or Thailand even). Singapore entire deal is that it the most convenient and most efficient port, the moment they stop being that it over. The more dangerous scenario would be Indonesia closing it water.
3
therealallpro8 hr ago
+1
I agree but getting them to agree and express it publicly is a big deal even if an obvious conclusion
1
LiKaSing_RealEstate5 hr ago
+1
Singapore opposes tolls, but Indonesia have already floated the idea.
1
citizen4206910113 hr ago
+15
That world currently exists from what I gathered.
Trump will never admit it on camera, because then he would be admitting he fucked up. I don't think he's even at the helm anymore TBH. They're going to just keep pumping him full of stims until they can't keep him upright.
15
madhattr9996 hr ago
+1
After that, there'll still be the weekend at Bernie's plot.
1
ThatsItImOverThis9 hr ago
+2
Well the Chinese delegation is probably full of educated people who know what they’re talking about. The Americans however…
2
rsa16 hr ago
What's wrong with the dream team of Witkoff, the first son in law and the couch f*****?
0
Sardaukar9915 hr ago
+23
Insert meme about “aren’t you missing someone’s consent “
23
marqjone70617 hr ago
+202
That’s great. But, the key is getting Iran to agree - not China.
202
Significant-Issue78116 hr ago
+163
IRGC has few allies. Russia and China are the largest. If one of the few people willing to support you, and the largest buyer of the oil you produce tells you "that's not gonna fly boss", you don't just say "too bad".
163
cscottnet14 hr ago
+4
Notable absent from this statement: Russia, who seems to like that all the embargoes against Russian oil have been lifted while the strait is closed.
4
s4nid16 hr ago
+44
It's the same with Ukraine and the US. You think the Ukraine would just surrender if the US told them? How did the Trump peace deal work out that he promised. Iran and China are allies, Iran is not a client state.
44
Mewhomewhy16 hr ago
+37
It’s “Ukraine” that’s the name of the country.
37
s4nid15 hr ago
-9
Ok, thats what my comment says?
-9
ThePeasantKingM15 hr ago
+20
They're objecting to "the Ukraine".
I don't fully understand why it's a thing, but Ukrainians have been pushing to eliminate this way of speaking.
20
clarkdashark15 hr ago
+19
It's sort of like saying, "The south". Russians often refer to it this way. Rather than acknowledging it's its own country.
19
WhatamItodonowhuh15 hr ago
+45
Because "the Ukraine" is a holdover from the USSR where they spoke of it as a region and not a distinct people and/or culture.
It diminishes them to refer to them by the old soviet nomenclature.
45
rbb3611 hr ago
+4
Interesting! I've known about the "the" for a long time, but didn't know why. TIL. Thanks!
4
Uniumtrium14 hr ago
-27
Ukraine means borderland. The borderland. Thus, the ukraine.
-27
WhatamItodonowhuh11 hr ago
+12
Yeah man, try saying that to "the blacks."
It's not what the people of Ukraine wish to be called. So stop being obtuse.
12
jyper10 hr ago
+3
most slavic languages including Ukrainian and russian don't have articles (a,the)
3
Lunar_BriseSoleil14 hr ago
+10
As others have said, it suggests it’s only a region and the assumed part is “of Russia.” Ukrainians didn’t want to feel like a subsidiary part of Russia even when they were friendly, so now they insist on a sovereign name.
10
RT-LAMP14 hr ago
+2
They used Ukraine singular in the first half of the comment so maybe that was meant to be "the ukrainians would..."?
2
Mewhomewhy14 hr ago
+3
Because “the Ukraine” is how Russia implies it’s a region of Russia rather than a country called Ukraine.
3
jyper10 hr ago
+2
Intrestingly Ukrainian russian and most slavic languages lack articles but the "The" debate mirrors the in(V) vs on(na) debate in a couple of slavic languages especially russian
we call very few countries the (if they end in republic or are plural like The Bahamas or The Netherlands) but use it more often with regions
With On it was often used for territories or sometimes for island nations. Ukraine has insisted on in Ukraine in both russian and Ukrainian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_of_Ukraine#Preposition_usage_in_Slavic
2
gummo_for_prez9 hr ago
+1
It's not though
1
Mission-Coffee1510 hr ago
+1
Why should they? The us does bascically nothing anything for them anyway since trump, eu and uk are their real partners here
1
GameOfThrownaws14 hr ago
+11
I've been saying this since day 1 and getting downvoted to shit for it since Listnook is an anti-US echo chamber where only the worst possible outcome can ever happen. I'm not even a patriotic person, I just live in reality. There's a reason that the Strait of Hormuz has been declared and utilized as international waters for decades. It's not like Iran wouldn't have liked to consider it territorial waters and profit off of it for all that time. But a bunch of richer, stronger, better countries with richer, stronger, better allies said nah, because they all need to use it. Because that's how reality works.
Iran will not be allowed to control Hormuz and charge money for its use on an ongoing basis. The only reason they're "getting away with" messing with it the past couple of months is because they're an active warzone and other countries don't want to get ensnared in Trump's shitshow tantrum. This was never going to be, and will never be, a permanent ongoing situation. Half the globe will absolutely shit on Iran, economically if not militarily, if they tried to pull this shit as a new status quo during peacetime.
11
Hackerpcs6 hr ago
+1
> Half the globe will absolutely shit on Iran, economically if not militarily, if they tried to pull this shit as a new status quo during peacetime
This, Western sanctions can be survived but if China decides to shit on them, with many Asian countries that they are allied to, they won't do it militarily because they're not stupid like Trump, they'll economically blockade them and force them to stop it and a dual blockade from both China and the west is not survivable
1
Bearded_Hobbit12 hr ago
-6
We literally gifted them the ability to shut down the straight for "checks notes" no f****** reason.
-6
AlphaB2712 hr ago
-6
I see a scenario in which Trump gives a lot of concessions on the grounds that the Strait returns to neutral territory, allowing Trump an off ramp to victory. Basically get us back to where we started but we wasted a majority of our missiles to accomplish f*** all and the Iranians make out like bandits, truly the Art of the Deal there.
-6
Diezelbub12 hr ago
+5
> trump gives a lot of concessions
Serious question: why would you think he would do that?
Its not an economically critical thing for the US to resolve. The countries it matters to most dont matter to Trump. He has more time to wait this out and keep Iran in hyperinflation, starved of the foreign currency influx that slows that, and ratcheting up the pressure on a regime that was needing to slaughter thousands of its own dissidents en masse just to stay upright even without that pressure.
5
FeistyGate87848 hr ago
-1
Trumps approval hit -19, the lowest since bush in 2008 and it’s getting worse due to the gas price increase. If gas prices set all time highs he might hit disapproval numbers not seen in decades
So that’s one reason. The other is, yes it would hurt our economy. Iran would be hurt far more by waiting for sure. But do you really think that the USA can just wait it out and be fine? Trump was elected partly because of the prior inflation burst post Covid. Now he is historically unpopular due to the economy and inflation and you are seriously saying there is no harm to be had in waiting months for the strait to open?
-1
Magistricide15 hr ago
+3
That's not really how oil works.
If a barrel goes for $100 on the global market, any barrel of oil going for $90 is going to be a good price. Even if China refuses to buy from Iran, some other country will buy from Iran at reduced prices, then just sell it to China, or use it themselves.
3
DeathMetal00714 hr ago
+11
Yes, but how do you sell oil you can’t move? No country has the military infrastructure to bypass US blockade - not even China. And pipelines don’t exist to supply China or any Iran-adjacent country.
11
Ian_W11 hr ago
+1
If a Chinese-flagged tanker exits the straits escorted by a Chinese military vessel, will the US stop and sink it ?
If not, then the USA does not have escalation dominance.
1
DeathMetal00711 hr ago
+3
Show me a single Chinese action (not words) to defend their oil shipments from Iran. I can wait.
On the priority list for China, engaging the US blockade for a pittance of oil is so low, the only people who I’ve seen calling for it are Listnookors.
3
Ian_W11 hr ago
-1
You can call 2.5 mmbd a pittance, if you like.
Xi's cautious. But the Chinese strategic oil reserve has limits.
-1
nomoneypenny10 hr ago
+2
I'm not even sure the PLA Navy can support an operation that far away from their shores
2
Ian_W10 hr ago
+2
It'd be a lot easier if they had the help of some neighbouring poor country with close links to China and a need for oil imports to be resumed.
Nahh, no way India or Pakistan would ever agree to reopening the Straits of Hormuz.
2
No-Ear798816 hr ago
-16
What incentive does China have to end this conflict? They can get oil over land, they have a huge oil reserve, and they have electricity as an alternative.
-16
FerretAres16 hr ago
+37
They can’t get enough oil over land. 50% of their 2025 supply transited the strait of Hormuz
37
faffc26016 hr ago
+18
oil is needed for more than just transportation and power, it and it's products are used in a lot of manufacturing, which china does quite a lot of.
18
MeatImmediate654916 hr ago
-1
They get a recovering global economy in which China, not America, is seen as the peacemaker and the center of the rule of international law.
When one considered how Trump's supporters decried the downfall of US industry on the world stage the irony of Trump propelling America's rivals to the forefront of the international order becomes acutely apparent.
Anyway. Release the Epstein files.
-1
pppiddypants15 hr ago
+7
Don’t forget, China is deeply intertwined with said global economy.
Avoiding a protracted energy supply shock induced global recession/depression would be pretty nice to avoid.
7
No-Ear798812 hr ago
+2
They'll get that regardless. If they prolong it, they'll get more openings to ship out their solar panels, opportunity to extend their EV reach, and grind down US forces and morale even more.
2
IncidentalApex12 hr ago
And if they decide not to charge their allies the fee then only their enemies have a problem, right?
0
CasinoNdnOk14 hr ago
-1
I think you are giving too little power to the one which holds thy oils.
-1
marqjone70616 hr ago
-16
The Iran foreign minister met with China last week, and as of me writing this, Iran has yet to back down on tolling, but go off.
-16
Significant-Issue78116 hr ago
+14
Are you suggesting that American and Chinese officials didn't meet in May and in April, saying no country should impose shipping tolls in the strait?
I don't think you quite understand how fractured the Iranian leadership is. There's no clear commander in charge, but sects that have a vague understanding of what they want.
14
DrB0012 hr ago
+1
Which means it's even less likely that the strait gets opened anytime soon.
1
Phoenix_Lazarus15 hr ago
+9
Well, I'm sure China won't have to pay tolls...
9
Any-Interaction606614 hr ago
Exactly. Iran wouldn't be that fuckin' stupid to charge them.
0
Diezelbub12 hr ago
+7
They still wont get past the blockade if theyre coming from Iran, toll or no
7
Any-Interaction606612 hr ago
-1
Do people seriously believe the US would fire on Chinese vessels if they decided f*** the blockade?
-1
Diezelbub12 hr ago
+3
Do you actually think that is how the blockade has been functioning? That's how Iran "closes the strait", thats not how the US has been blockading commercial vessels doing business in Iran. Chinese vessels do business in Iran because its cheaper since they dont care about sanctions and will accept their easily manipulated currency (since they immediately turn around and spend it importing things from China, its more of a barter sysyem because Iran's currency is even less reliable due to hyperinflation) when that isnt the case and its more trouble than its worth the tankers are not ramming US Navy vessels. Theyre just returning to port to sit things out if its already too late to go elsewhere.
3
Any-Interaction606612 hr ago
I'm sorry, but what? The US is blockading anyone doing business with Iran from passing. If China said mind your business to us here in the US, and decided to go do business with Iran, you believe the US would stop that Chinese vessel by any means necessary?
0
Diezelbub11 hr ago
+4
>Do you actually think that is how the blockade has been functioning? When business is more trouble than its worth the tankers are not ramming US Navy vessels. Theyre just returning to port to sit things out if its already too late to go elsewhere.
Which part of this was confusing? Chinese military and government owned vessels arent doing business in Iran. Their government and military arent willing to force commercial vessels past the blockade. Even if Iran lets them by because they're a favored trade partner, docking in Iran then waving a Chinese flag doesnt get them past the blockade, they get by because theyre not doing business in Iran.
4
Any-Interaction606611 hr ago
+1
Again, you think we would fire on Chinese vessels if they decided enough? You aren't answering that simple question. That's why I'm confused by your response.
1
Diezelbub11 hr ago
+4
The US has an actual deep water navy and air force supporting it, they can board commercial vessels, unlike Iran they dont need to sink them from the shore or launch tiny kamikaze boats after them. Which is why Chinese commercial vessels arent stupid enough to ignore radio transmissions telling them that will happen even if listnook struggles to understand why that is. I sometimes forget that this extreme disparity in capability needs a detailed explanation for many, my mistake.
4
Ian_W11 hr ago
> Chinese military and government owned vessels arent doing business in Iran.
Yes they are.
JV Innovation, although Marshalls-registered, was Chinese owned.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-08/chinese-oil-tanker-attacked-in-strait-of-hormuz/106659160
0
Diezelbub11 hr ago
+2
> owned by RONGHE CHANGYOU XIX LEASING and associated with Tianjin Yuanbo International Shipping Co Ltd, located in the Tianjin Free Trade Zone
>Chinese military and government owned
Do you see these two quotes as indistinguishable? Because I cant read them for you, I can only tell you they're not actually the same thing in reality.
If you actually read that link its about a ship that is trying to escape the strait after doing business in the strait before hostilities commenced, its not a ship still actually trying to do business there. The US blockade wouldnt apply and they have no idea who shot at them - except that it wasn't a missile and left them fully operational (so probably Iran). They tried to leave after Iran announced they could and continued to get conflicting reports from them since Iran has no actual central leadership or authority capable of guaranteeing passage...which means no ships with half a brain and their sanity intact will be arriving to do business with Iran.
2
HellcatSRT16 hr ago
+7
Take everything the US state department says with a grain of a salt, they are full of shit.
7
DDoubleDDog15 hr ago
+3
The Islamic Republic will never agree which is why the regime will be removed from power.
3
Ian_W11 hr ago
+1
You're wrong on both counts.
The Islamic Republic says yes to a deal is that the Straits are open, sanctions are lifted against Iranian exports and all the nuclear issues are kicked into the long grass for the future to deal with.
Of course, Israel will not agree to that deal.
1
Thud14 hr ago
+19
I remember a few months ago when there were no Hormuz tolls.
19
sonic_couth9 hr ago
-2
But the DOW was 50k then
-2
Rehberkintosh15 hr ago
+14
People being asked to pay tolls agree that they'd rather not pay tolls.
14
SushiJesus12 hr ago
+1
If Iran are happy to sell their oil in Yuan, then they're probably at least open to the idea of not charging China a toll.
1
Orwick17 hr ago
+46
I would like to confirm on this from both sides?
This could be market manipulation.
46
Hikarilo16 hr ago
+66
China opposes the tolling of the Hormuz strait for the same reason countries like Singapore opposes it. It sets a precedent for other countries to start tolling major maritime trade chokepoints, such as the Malacca Strait, which can cause large disruptions to China's trade and supply chain network.
This doesn't mean China doesn't support Iran in retaliating against the US. They just don't like how Iran is doing this by tolling the Hormuz strait. China are more than willing to support Iran in other areas besides the Hormuz Strait issue.
66
Bear_Jew-4215 hr ago
+7
Eh, I think you’re overestimating China’s appetite to help the Iranian regime. Yeah sure, china would love to give the US a black eye on the world stage, but they’d also be thrilled to get rid of the crazy islamists being able to hold the world economy hostage.
Even if the US was able to install the most puppet of puppet regimes in Iran, they’d still do business with china not too much would be effected there.
7
Lunar_BriseSoleil14 hr ago
+10
There is no way China would be supportive of a U.S. puppet regime in Iran. Plus, the track record of U.S. puppet regimes in the Middle East has not been one of stability.
10
Ian_W11 hr ago
+5
Every American interceptor and missile that gets sent to Israel is one not being sent to Taiwan.
If Iran sends China c**** oil, and gets Chinese made anti-shipping missiles, the US Navy away is pulled away from Taiwan.
Sure, none of this is in Israel's interests, but that's why China wants the Iranian regime buying weapons from it.
And there's a perfectly good road and rail corridor from Beijing to Tehran.
5
DrB0012 hr ago
+2
Which is why China has massively shifted it's energy production to green energy.
China is the world's highest producer of solar energy by a wide margin, generating roughly 1,175 TWh of solar power in 2025, which accounts for over 30% of global solar energy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_by_country
2
ttinchung11116 hr ago
+11
I mean- it affects everyone, I doubt China wants to be affected by the strait's issues, the question is whether they are going to do anything about it.
11
Unicornoftheseas16 hr ago
+2
It’s not market manipulation, that only happens on Fridays after markets close
2
jaquesparblue16 hr ago
+33
Does China also know this?
33
Snigglybear13 hr ago
-7
Yup! The CCP confirmed it. Iran messed up by playing around with China’s money. China’s going to whip Iran back in line!
-7
Ian_W11 hr ago
+2
Evidence, thank you.
I'll accept a statement from Chinese state media, if you can link it.
2
dougmcclean15 hr ago
+8
I mean, I certainly assumed as much. But if the State Department is saying so, maybe it needs another look.
8
Ian_W11 hr ago
+1
You mean 'it needs independent verification'.
1
PJM12345615 hr ago
+13
Trump’s State Dept claims China opposes tolls…. They claim a lot of falsehoods.
13
AbsoluteGote14 hr ago
+3
They probably made a complex statement that's essentially "yes, but..." And Trump cannot understand those. He heard what he wants which is yes. He still doesn't understand this isn't a used car salesman situation or one where people can just give him a completely hollow words-only political "victory" that amounts to nothing. Actual, difficult to navigate, substantive things have to happen here.
3
DownwardSpirals11 hr ago
+2
If only we had an plan of action that encompassed all of the things we're at war about that was signed off on by multiple countries. Like a joint comprehensive plan of... well, shit.
2
DrPsyz916 hr ago
+8
The entire world except Iran opposes it. Who's willing to do anything about it? Especially now that we've failed so miserably.
8
HardlyW0rkingHard15 hr ago
+7
I don’t know what’s going to happen in Iran but how can you say something has failed less than 3 months into a conflict?
7
DrPsyz914 hr ago
+2
Like this: We've failed miserably.
2
HardlyW0rkingHard12 hr ago
+4
Progress is not linear.
4
DrPsyz98 hr ago
-1
What progress? There has only been regression.
-1
ScoobiusMaximus14 hr ago
Because at this point it's clear that the only way the US could achieve anything militarily significant against Iran would be a ground invasion that the US does have the stomach for. It would be Afghanistan and Iraq on steroids.
0
HardlyW0rkingHard12 hr ago
+3
If the regime collapses and Iran has a revolution in a year or two, I would consider this option to be successful.
3
ScoobiusMaximus11 hr ago
So if that doesn't happen it's a failure and you will admit that?
Honestly if Trump wanted a regime collapse this was the dumbest way to go about it. Letting the 87 year old Khamenei die of natural causes probably would have caused a succession crisis on its own. Iran was in deep shit economically with the whole country running out of water and massive protests being violently put down frequently. The regime was unstable and autocratic regimes are always most vulnerable when succession is being fought over.
Trump united Iran against him and made Khamenei a martyr. He let them bypass the succession crisis and blame the US for all the internal issues that Iran has. He saved the IRGC.
0
HardlyW0rkingHard10 hr ago
+2
Lol I have plenty of family still in Iran. I can guarantee you that Trump didn't unite anybody against the US through the attacks. We all still hate the Islamic republic.
2
ScoobiusMaximus7 hr ago
+1
I'm glad you speak for all of Iran.
One question though, if everyone in Iran hates the government, why is it still there?
1
FeistyGate87848 hr ago
-1
Because they said it would take 4-6 weeks max, and they declared victory like 5 days after it started. And the SOS just said that the operation was over a week ago.
So it was gonna take 4-6 weeks, took 2.5 months and is now over apparently. So now ask yourself why can’t we say it failed it they literally said it’s over and would only take 4-6 weeks
-1
HardlyW0rkingHard8 hr ago
+2
Trump says a lot of things. Don't take anything he says at face value. The full scale attack was about the 6 weeks you mentioned and I think the Hormoz issue has complicated things. However I believe the islamic republic has collapsed and the only thing holding things together is the fact that they're shut the strait. But their money has dried up as well, they haven't shipped any oil via the strait for 28 days now.
2
FeistyGate87848 hr ago
Right but it wasn’t just Trump. The entire admin and his allies in congress said it
I have no doubt the regime in Iran is weakened. But I believe you are severely underestimating how much pressure Trump is to get this to end quickly as the war is already unpopular here and he was elected to bring inflation down and not get into foreign conflicts. I never believed anything he said but other Americans did. So the idea of continued energy inflation and food inflation is dire for him and the republicans
Americans just don’t care as much about the war as Trump wanted us to, and his approval numbers are going the way of Jimmy Carter if this drags on
0
Bear_Jew-4215 hr ago
-4
Maybe you should try wringing your hands some more, it’s early days war is always a gamble we’ll see what happens.
-4
DrPsyz914 hr ago
+4
I'll try that, thanks for the suggestion. How many more months past initial projections until it's no longer early days?
4
the-awesomer15 hr ago
+4
'early days' this short operation was supposed to be over like 4 times by now. but I do agree, its likely this is just the beginning of this quagmire
4
rsa16 hr ago
The war was over in a few hours if we go by what the presidential pedophile said.
0
East1st15 hr ago
+4
I feel like NACHOs tonight
4
PluginAlong13 hr ago
+1
It's Tuesday though, TACO Tuesday.
1
Wollastonite15 hr ago
+4
does china know?
4
Rialagma12 hr ago
+1
Yeah, obviously. The whole world agrees, it's just being used right now as a bargaining chip by Iran
1
bigredthesnorer12 hr ago
+1
China says ‘what?’
1
Ice_Milk10 hr ago
+1
Isn’t Rubio still on China’s sanctions list? In keeping with his usual style, you’d expect him to reflexively reject anything China signs off on.
1
phatbody10 hr ago
+1
I agreed to oppose the tolls here on our bridges. Still paying.
1
Mewhomewhy16 hr ago
China opposes US tolls.
0
1Beholderandrip16 hr ago
-4
How bad do you have to run a country for China and the U.S. to agree you're making a mistake
-4
Neither_Owl867116 hr ago
+10
How bad to you have to f*** up to have to run to China for help, when your supposed to be the greatest country ever
10
1Beholderandrip16 hr ago
-12
> run to China for help,
🤣 lmfao
-12
dz450515 hr ago
It’s more for self interest. If Iran is allowed to do this, I’d imagine other nations will start doing this eventually, for everything, not just oil. Think Panama Canal but not man made.
Seeing how China exports most in the world, I’d imagine this affects them the most.
0
Snigglybear13 hr ago
China just b**** slapped and put Iran back in line. Iran messed up by messing with China’s money.
0
EdiblePeasant12 hr ago
I sense a new lovefest starting, but it could just be my imagination.
0
Puzzled-Maize-224115 hr ago
-2
Well, it’s not their straight so both of them can f*** off.
-2
Morfe14 hr ago
-1
So China holds the cards eh. Wondering what the US will give to get the strait open again as it was before the war.
-1
SideInitial396115 hr ago
-6
Bullshit. China is NOT joining US to oppose Iran. Don't be so gullible listnook.
-6
the-awesomer15 hr ago
+6
China can not want to pay tolls in hormuz but also want the USA to hurt themselves as much as possible during operation epstien fury. They arent mutually exclusive.
6
SideInitial396115 hr ago
-5
You've seen proof Iran asked China to pay toll?
-5
Hockeyhoser14 hr ago
-1
Can you smell the winning?
-1
RidiculousRex8911 hr ago
-1
So China and the US dont agree...
What the actual f***....
-1
briyijones13 hr ago
-6
Who gives a rip what Chinese think it's Iran who decides now mother f***** too late lol 👌
127 Comments