· 102 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 8, 2026 at 9:19 AM

China confirms it helped Pakistan’s air force during last year’s war with India

Posted by batman8990777


China confirms it helped Pakistan’s air force during last year’s war with India
South China Morning Post
China confirms it helped Pakistan’s air force during last year’s war with India
Engineers tell state media they offered technical support during conflict that saw an Indian-owned Rafale downed by a Chinese-made fighter.

🚩 Report this post

102 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Thurak0 5 days ago +777
China probably gladly gathered first hand experience. Especially against India. So it makes a lot of sense that they have technical stuff in Pakistan.
777
nishitd 5 days ago +238
For sure. They got to test their defensive and offensive technologies without getting their own hands dirty. In case it ever has to face to face with USA or Europe while capturing Taiwan.
238
active2fa 5 days ago +62
also us gear in Pakistan . Eg f-16s in combat roles
62
crimsonhues 5 days ago +120
Or face India and other southeast Asian countries.
120
gtr06 4 days ago +13
Or face Indochina and other Chinas.
13
Brief_Hospital_1766 5 days ago +68
Oddly enough, if they do it before Trump leaves office they won't have to worry about America intervening on behalf of Taiwan.
68
k4kobe 5 days ago +30
You’re assuming he leaves office
30
cinemasosa 5 days ago +23
Well, he'll eventually die!
23
Brief_Hospital_1766 5 days ago +17
3 cheers for the Golden Hamberder!
17
TheRealistoftheReal 4 days ago +3
Ever see Weekend at Bernie’s? We’re almost there.
3
No-Estimate-1510 3 days ago +2
There are DJT Jr and Eric and Baron (just male-line succession, if you go by female lines you also have Ivanka and Tiff).
2
cinemasosa 3 days ago +1
The United "Kingdom" states, "You have become the very thing you sought to destroy."
1
Round_Year_8595 5 days ago +6
When he passed, it would be hilarious if his will says to sit him at the desk in the oval office, seal the room, and pipe in preservative gas to keep him pristine and presidential for eternity. The Oval Tomb
6
Akrab00t 5 days ago +21
Europe isn't willing to defend their own - they surely would never raise a finger for Taiwan. Hopefully USA does.
21
maverickhawk99 5 days ago +31
Yea people forget that China hasn’t been involved in an armed conflict in decades so most of their current military lacks experience.
31
JarvisModeOn 5 days ago +358
So basically, it wasn't just Pakistan vs India in the air, it was also a live test of the Chinese system under real conditions. That part is probably what makes this more significant than the usual post-war claims.
358
Poupulino 5 days ago +197
The Chinese used that and the Iran war to gather colossal amounts of data, [they even sent the largest intelligence ship in the world to the Gulf during the first weeks of the war](https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/china-liaowang-1-spy-ship-gulf-of-oman-us-israel-iran-war-surveillance/#google_vignette), a 30,000 tons vessel entirely filled with large radars and antennas, along with 6 destroyers. The amount of data they captured must be colossal.
197
bradland 5 days ago +73
China is playing 5D chess right now. As America squanders its influence around the globe, China is strategically weakening all of its geopolitical adversaries without firing a single shot. Military power is a bit like a magic trick. Much of its power is derived from the mystery. Once everyone knows how the magic trick works, it's no longer powerful. Every time the American military deploys their forces, their adversaries have an opportunity to study the "trick". This is among the many strategic failures of the DJT administration. DJT and his Secretary of War pick think there is no point to having a powerful military that we don't use. Reality is that the opposite is true. In large part, the point of a large military is so that you don't *have* to use it.
73
JarvisModeOn 5 days ago +5
Exactly. The data from real-world radar, sensors, and EW activity is probably the bigger prize long term
5
babloochoudhury 5 days ago +43
And yet the Chinese military is still regarded as a paper dragon that only engages in saber rattling at worse or small military skirmishes at best which they get humbled.
43
KGB_cutony 5 days ago +87
Maybe it's just me, but I would rather the Chinese army sabre rattle than engaging in any real fighting.
87
Inside-Line 5 days ago +30
IKR, people say it like having no hot war experience is an insult to the country. Thank f*** they don't actually start shit, and shame on countries that actually do.
30
themeanreds1 5 days ago +16
The pentagon would beg to differ
16
LegsAndArmsAndTorso 5 days ago +41
People keep repeating this but from where I am sat it is not true. Spend some time reading https://twz.com China are modernising at an insane pace. The US military are beginning to think of them as a peer adversary instead of a near peer adversary. We must not underestimate the threat from China.
41
phycologist 5 days ago +13
> We must not underestimate the threat from China China certainly does not underestimate the threat from the USA.
13
LARPerator 4 days ago +1
I think it comes from a few things. 1. China has no overt military experience in the last generation. They haven't fought since Vietnam in the 70s, and even that was extremely limited. This is a good thing IMO, but it does make people think they are not effective. 2. They have no interest in power projection. China isn't concerned with how to unload a landing force or deploy an air wing in the Atlantic. They care about their region only. 3. The big one, economics. When people call China a paper dragon it's because they're analysing the capabilities of one weapon or vehicle compared to another. But that's not the whole story. China has a massive manufacturing sector with very high vertical integration and a blended state capitalist model. Simple military expenditure isn't the whole story. China building 50% more missiles that perform 80% as well for 35% less money will look on paper like a weaker force, but will in reality overwhelm the enemy. The USA is starting to realize that they simply weren't prepared for a real war. They've been bludgeoning part timers and small timers for a generation or two and have forgotten how to prepare for a more even fight. Iran, weakened by sanctions and isolation, with a significant tech disadvantage, has managed to weather the American onslaught surprisingly well, to the point that people are questioning if the USA has enough of its high tech weapons left to finish the job. And that's not talking about the multiple years that they'll be flat footed as they restock, since they didn't think they would need to expend more than a handful of missiles before the enemy capitulated.
1
Rich_Housing971 5 days ago +8
The people thinking China's a paper tiger are the same people thinking a heavyweight boxer is weak because they had a disagreement at a bar and the boxer didn't do anything.
8
tradetofi 5 days ago +14
\>>The Chinese military is still regarded as a paper dragon Listnook generals?
14
Ok-Echidna5936 5 days ago +14
Their intel definitely is. There were Chinese officials on the ground during the Venezuela raid for Maduro and were totally caught off guard But yeah that Filipino fishing boat that gave the Chinese navy the stanky leg was bad optics for them
14
Caesarea_G 5 days ago +8
China's neighbors would beg to differ. 
8
Suggondeezenutz_-_ 5 days ago +29
I think that's coming from a Chinese neighbor.. China is known for it's economic coersion tactics with military posturing... It has no real battle success.. Even in the skirmishes with Philippines which were highly provocative in nature. Personally I think it's great though, because they don't want to get tied down like Russia and now the USA, which tends to have a real drain on resources and causes local disaffection. But that also makes your capabilities theoretical...
29
Constant-Tax527 3 days ago +1
The PLA is not considered a paper tiger by anyone informed.
1
SurammuDanku 5 days ago +2
As someone who knows nothing about war, what sort of data would they expect to get from this?
2
Paradethejared 4 days ago +2
That ship looks crazy
2
Cheeky_Star 4 days ago +2
China has been doing this for decades especially stealing tech. This ain’t anything new and all countries spy on each other for weakness and tech.
2
Aviyan 5 days ago +14
Similarly, there was some Israeli and Russian equipment on the Indian side that also got some battle testing. But it's big for China as their technology has never been used in battle.
14
JarvisModeOn 5 days ago +8
Yeah, fair point. The difference is that China is still proving its systems outside drills and sales demos.
8
socialistrob 5 days ago +12
I think it's kind of amazing how many people in the west have totally overlooked the flare up between India and Pakistan in terms of understanding modern warfare. I'm not a military expert but one of the things that stuck out to me was that both India and Pakistan have competent militaries with air defense and yet both sides were able to get strikes in. Both sides also could have benefited heavily from a lot more air defense. It was a similar message that we also saw with the earlier Iran-Israel fight and the war with Russia and Ukraine yet military planners in the US especially seemed to think that there wasn't anything to be learned. Then when the US started fighting Iran it quickly became apparent the US went into the war without sufficient air defense stockpiles and layered defense networks. To me it just speaks to hubris on the part of the US. Do they really think that both Pakistan and India are incompetent nobodies?
12
JarvisModeOn 5 days ago +9
Yeah, I think the mistake is treating these conflicts like regional side stories instead of real case studies. Pakistan and India both have serious militaries, so if both sides are still getting hits through, that says something about how hard layered defense is now. Not every lesson has to come from a US/NATO battlefield to matter.
9
socialistrob 5 days ago +8
I think there's just a lot of arrogance in how the US approaches war. Obviously no one conflict is going to be a perfect example of how future wars are fought but I think when there is large scale fighting it's important to pay attention. Often times the reason major military powers lose wars is because they get comfortable in the way they've always done things and fail to adapt to the times.
8
LazyAd7772 4 days ago +3
they didnt even learn from ukraine, and ukraine said they have been sharing data on how to counter shaheds for 2 years.
3
DependentEchidna87 5 days ago +151
It is assumed this would be happening. They. Are exercising their ISR and its integration with targeting cycles
151
chicknsnotavegetabl 5 days ago +104
Wait I thought they didn't meddle in others affairs
104
Hanc3y 5 days ago +84
It’s a lie. All big countries meddle with other affair. Surprise Surprise.
84
Striking-Still-1742 5 days ago +25
No, that's not interference. Logistics and maintenance support are normal components of an arms deal.
25
chefkc 4 days ago +5
This went far beyond that… India did not receive this level of help from France from whom they purchased the planes the my used.
5
Striking-Still-1742 4 days ago +10
India hosts French technical and logistics personnel, who are directly involved in support operations. The core source codes for the Rafale's avionics, fire control, and electronic warfare systems remain undisclosed. Annual operation requires remote authorization as well as on-site activation from France, which mandates the presence of French personnel.
10
pepehandreee 4 days ago +2
Didn’t meddle as like, they didn’t send troops to topple government, nor have they demand foreign country to alter their economic policies or face sanctions. This doesn’t mean PRC, the state known for its massive export volume, doesn’t sell things to foreign entity.
2
ValWillKay 5 days ago +39
Calling it a war is really stretching definitions. (I live here)
39
Teknoyrus 5 days ago +142
Atleat 1 Rafale gone, and yet India is signing its biggest ever defense deal for French Rafales at approx $40 B for more than 100 jets. Chinese PR to deter French sales is not very productive when their biggest customer is your adversary itself.
142
gree2 5 days ago +139
because international leaders and armed forces don't make decisions based on social media pr. that is simply to keep up their popularity among their own people. these sales are based on analysis of actual events of the engagement. all the Indian aircraft losses were on the 1st day of the skirmish when only Pakistan was attacking India and India was categorically not targeting any Pak state assets as it maintained that it is not in war with Pakistan, and only targeting known terrorist camps. When India also decided to retaliate next day onward, it was freely attacking air force bases and Pakistan air force did not even respond to defend, because they were more concerned about not incurring any losses. maintaining a favorable aircraft loss scorecard was more important for it than defending its bases.
139
Teknoyrus 5 days ago +20
I have nothing to say about what happened during the war. My point was more regarding the concentrated effort by the Chinese later to thwart Rafale sales globally.
20
gree2 5 days ago +11
yes, both China and France are competitors in that space right now, so they will try to gain market share from each other. not aware of the actual sales of both the parties though. apart from India, which alone is a big buyer, how many countries purchase from France and China respectively and what are the new orders figures in the past year?
11
Teknoyrus 5 days ago +14
Post the 4 day, just 1 undisclosed MoU for J17. Customer and total number of jets not publicly available. So the j17 demand stuff is actually more smoke than business. For J10, Indonesia has shown the intent for 42 jets. I beleive the first major customer outside Pakistan. Foe Rafale 26 Jets order from Indian navy. 114 jets approved, not placed from Indian airforce.
14
Uncrowned_Monarch 5 days ago +5
True but also social media and PR can affect the general population which can use their voting power to force politicians which can interfere with such decisions. It's definitely possible.
5
remer_1z101 4 days ago +1
But it is also true iaf got surprised by pak air to air missiles. I think they made mistake judging it's range.
1
woolcoat 5 days ago +35
To be fair, India doesn’t have any other viable alternatives
35
slimeyy_02 5 days ago +45
Well there's Su-57 (tho Russia is currently down the drain). Also didn't Trump offered F-35 to India on Modi's visit to America in 2025? Tho still Rafale being the last alternatkve is still not a bad idea, as inspite of losing one jet, the Rafale's EW suite was phenomenal in the May skirmishes
45
obeytheturtles 5 days ago +15
India spent a billion dollars collaborating on the Su-57 (Pak-Fa) program, and then immediately pulled out of it when they got the first technology demonstrators. Since then they have been pretty sour on having Russia be its only provider of weapons, and have been looking much more to the US and EU. But India is still wary of the "immaculate weapon" doctrine, and still wants to have a backbone of cheaper weapons in large numbers.
15
socialistrob 5 days ago +3
Trusting Russia to be a long term weapons provider for India is a mistake. India already paid for a bunch of S-400 systems that were supposed to be delivered in 2022 but Russia diverted them because of the war in Ukraine and India is still waiting. Russia is also extremely close with China especially economically and if India if India is reliant on Russia it opens up the possibility that China and Russia just sign some sort of deal to cut off India. Long term India needs to make their own weapons if they ever want to be a great power. I know that's easier said than done but relying on a weird mix of Russia, France and Israel is just not a good long term strategy. Producing them domestically would also enable India to pump military spending back into the Indian economy rather than sending it overseas which would effectively mean they could buy much larger amounts of weapons.
3
TeaSharp3154 5 days ago +17
F35 is a very bad deal for India. It's an amazing plane and better than anything else India has now, but the dependence it creates on the US (with regards to maintenance, parts, software) is unacceptable to India's plans for self reliance and being a non aligned power. It is much better from the Indian strategic perspective to have a worse air force but be self reliant than to have a really good one in the short term but be reliant on another power
17
Brief_Hospital_1766 5 days ago +16
Congress would have stopped any F-35 sales to India.
16
Nerezza_Floof_Seeker 5 days ago +4
The SU 57 is an option, but yeah with Russia as it is right now, theres no chance of it happening (short of some sort of full tech transfer to India and allowing then to make it domestically) even before considering the potential optics of such a deal nowadays. And theres really no practical chance of the US selling the F35 to India, because of how close their relationship is with Russia (hell, the US made turkey go without the F35 for picking the S400s, and Indias relationship with russia is way closer than that).
4
slimeyy_02 5 days ago +3
Well US did the CAATSA waiver for India to buy S-400. Also didn't Boeing get the license from American government to market the F15-ex for India's MRFA programme and US also pitched the F/A- 18 for the Indian carriers but the navy went with Naval Rafale. Tho, i agree with you F-35 would be a way different story given the precedents of America selling it to only the closest strategic partners.
3
Teknoyrus 5 days ago +1
That was not the point. The point was China made a sweeping attempt globally to disrupt rafale sales and pitching their jet as an alternative. That falls on the face when the largest importer in the world is not your customer, rather choose to advertise the same product all over again in the grandest way possible.
1
Big_Huckleberry_6851 5 days ago +25
I don't think even the Chinese expected India to buy their jets
25
infidel11990 5 days ago +13
Aircraft losses by India were due to operational failure and the way Indian conducted those strikes. Without targeting radars based in Pakistan first, they asked Imdian pilots to attack targets inside Pakistan. This isn't on Rafale or Indian pilots themselves. It was due to the mission set up and due to underestimating Pakistan Air Forces ability to track and hit Indian jets with BVR weapons.
13
brainanimaniac 5 days ago +49
And this is why Kashmir can never be independent. Even if India agrees to it, Pakistan and China won't allow it. I'm sure Afghanistan will shoot its shot too. That's the reason that Kashmir signed up to be part of the Indian federation in the first place.
49
Miracle_0001 5 days ago +338
Imagine getting help and still losing thier shit
338
BojackInMan 5 days ago +228
As expected, Chinese claims of being a peaceful country which doesn't interfere in affairs of others is totally farce.
228
madtoothbrush97 5 days ago +62
Chinese will claim they are helping a sovereign nation defend itself even though that sovereign nation has a habit of using terrorists against another nation. Chinese - we dont care about that!
62
Striking-Still-1742 5 days ago +9
Logistics and maintenance support are normal components of an arms deal.
9
--iamrightHERE-- 5 days ago +8
When did China claim they did not interfere in international affairs? What?
8
madtoothbrush97 5 days ago +20
They have routinely said this many times during UN resolutions and when they want to show moral upper hand vs West. Are you living in a cave?
20
BojackInMan 5 days ago +8
I clearly wrote 'CHINESE'. read properly China's government does too BTW. here's a small copy paste of article from Chinese embassy in India: 2023-09-24 13:43 The Chinese people are now marching ahead on the path to modernization. Modernization, however, may not evoke pleasant memories for everyone in the world. In many cases, it comes along with expansion, friction, and even conflict. But does it have to be this way? China has given a resounding answer: its modernization will be achieved through peaceful development. In fact, China is the only country whose Constitution says it “keeps to a path of peaceful development.” Why is this a big deal?  Peace is in China’s DNA  Like the Mayan, Inca and Egyptian civilizations, the Chinese civilization is an agrarian one. With their vast plains, the Chinese developed a generally self-sufficient economy, and would earn nature’s blessings through their hard work and resilience throughout millennia. Self-sufficiency, to a large extent, shaped the Chinese national character of cherishing peace.  From statesmen advocating the governance philosophy of “peace among all nations” to the ordinary people believing “friendliness brings wealth”, the culture of peace has long been woven into the fabric of the Chinese society. Even The Art of War by Sun Tsu, a military work widely acclaimed by strategists across the world, stresses that “the skillful leader subdues the enemy’s troops without any fighting.”  The pursuit of peace is a consistent theme in China’s history. The Belt and Road Initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping is inspired by the ancient Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road, which started and flourished respectively during the Han (206 B.C. to 220 A.D.) and Tang (618 A.D. to 906 A.D.) Dynasties, the heyday of China’s feudal society. But the purpose of the two roads was trade and exchange, not invasion or expansion. In the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), China was leading the world economy and capable of building the world’s largest fleet. But when the great navigator Zheng He led seven voyages to the western oceans, what China sought was fair trade, not plundering or looting; it sent porcelain and tea leaves to countries along the route, not “sword and cross.”  China needs peaceful development for its modernization drive  On the path of peaceful development, China has never waged a war, or encroached upon a single inch of another country’s land. After the People’s Republic of China was founded, it took the lead in proposing and acting on the five principles of peaceful coexistence. Among the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, China is the largest contributor of peacekeepers. China is also the only one of the five nuclear-weapon states (P5) that has pledged no-first-use of nuclear weapons.  Peaceful development is the most realistic and best solution for China to pursue its national interests. China is advancing the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation on all fronts through a Chinese path to modernization. The key to this ambition is running its own affairs well, focusing on development and making its people better off. That, first and foremost, requires a peaceful and stable environment at home and abroad.   Giving up peaceful development is not cost-effective considering China’s endowment and its interdependence with the rest of the world. China has a supersize market with 1.4 billion people, including over 400 million in the middle-income group. China is a major trading partner of more than 140 countries and regions. These mean enormous potential in China’s consumption and export. China is also an innovation powerhouse and has complete industrial and infrastructure systems. Its high-tech industries such as new energy vehicles (NEVs), 5G and photovoltaics (PV) are highly competitive and enjoy a strong momentum. China is also deeply integrated into the international system, making huge progress amid globalization and benefiting the world in the process. As President Xi Jinping put it, “all countries are in a community with destinies linked.”  The global significance of China’s peaceful pursuit of modernization  From the 2nd CELAC Heads of State and Government Summit declaring that the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) was a “zone of peace”, the ASEAN Regional Forum Statement on Reiterating Commitment to Preserve Southeast Asia as A Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone, to the Jeddah Declaration adopted at the 32nd Arab League Summit emphasizing Arab unity and cooperation, and the AU Agenda 2063 aiming for “an integrated, prosperous and peaceful Africa” in 50 years, peace has always been the aspiration of the vast majority of countries and people.  As the world’s second most populous country and the second largest economy, China is developing itself by unleashing its internal dynamism and peacefully utilizing external resources. It does not oppress any other nation in any form or rob others of resources and wealth; instead, it goes all out to help and support fellow developing countries. The Chinese path to modernization via peaceful development will bring new hope to people of all countries who yearn for peace and development, and contribute even more to world peace, tranquility, prosperity and development
8
ReflectionUnlucky172 5 days ago +20
>peace is in chinas dna This is the same country where a dude declared himself brother of jesus chirst and then had a war where 30 million died
20
Snoutysensations 5 days ago +37
I expect India will find some way to show China how it feels about that.   Not a direct act of aggression, no, but maybe an offer of assistance to, I don't know, Taiwan or the Philippines?  
37
cleon80 5 days ago +106
Philippines here. We already bought the Brahmos missile from India.
106
Snoutysensations 5 days ago +36
I hope you never need to use them!  
36
Uncrowned_Monarch 5 days ago +12
I hope they don't need to, but I hope they do use it for the funsies. Drop it on winnie the pooh
12
Man_from_Bombay 5 days ago +17
if properly used, Brahmos is one of the few carrier killers missiles in the world.
17
Boyslop_Enjoyer 5 days ago +45
The current ongoing talks of BrahMos sales to Vietnam might be something
45
TetrasTetra 5 days ago +32
isn't India already trying to make the Andaman Nicobar side like Strait of Hormuz, so in theory, they can block China's oil supply.
32
slimeyy_02 5 days ago +27
Nah it's just usual thing. Anyone who is even remotely aware of the India-Pakistan conflicts knows that it's China that is keeping Pakistan afloat. They provide about 80% of Pakistan arms and lots other loans and grants with strategic help too, well buying arms is bilateral matter tho no one is foolish enough to think the massive d******* and several grants China provides to Pakistan for thier arms don't have ulterior motives. Like recently as per reports they are giving 5th gen J35 A to Pakistan at significantly lower costs than what it's market at, now this is gonna stir up more headache for India, this clearly shows China's hostility to India despite India still maintains One China policy. Well most people who aren't aware of the asian power dynamics think that hey it's only America that is the sole hegemonic bully, but China also plays it parts well, it's just that they do it covertly. India and other neighbours of China like Japan, Phillipines etc clearly knows that after Taiwan falls, China will shift it's focus on them as they've builiding up across their land border and the 9 dash line based on some bullshit claim of "oh my 7 gazillion old empire set foot in here so this is muhh territory" . I've seeing some gullible people in India based on their hate for US recently saying that it's just US that is pushing India and China fight one another, we are civilizational brothers lol, looks like someone forgot the 1962 War, well yeah US is currently down the drain at withholding their international relations, but they are still a democracy albeit flawed, so things have atleast some probability to get changed.
27
gree2 5 days ago +1
india, like the rest of the world, is too reliant on china to even think of doing any such thing.
1
Calledinthe90s 5 days ago +139
I don’t think that’s something for China to brag about, seeing as Pakistan got wrecked.
139
NoPerformance4830 5 days ago +42
the problem is less with pakistan getting wrecked and more with the fact that china got to test their stuff with 0 risks if they lost it gives them feedback and if they won, well that would be good for them ig? the main thing is that they have their own military equipment along india's west while they have their own borders along the east AND they are gaining geopolitical monopoly cuz the US and russia are being f****** stupid
42
fancczf 5 days ago
Huh? The article was about the air engagement involving Chinese J10C that led to 8 Indian aircraft losses, and at the very least one confirmed Rafael loss. That was for sure a Pakistan victory and probably the best example of modern standoff air engagement we have got in the last 20 years. That was the first time ever China’s top line equipment got proper modern high stake combat test. Against a top line 4.5 gen fighter, used by a competent modern military force.
0
OrdoXenos 5 days ago +40
With how Indonesia and India still buy tons of Rafale and China is not expanding their market I think the Chinese have failed.
40
mindful-hedonism 5 days ago +60
And yet, they were thrashed
60
Simple_Mall_9388 4 days ago +10
That guy Prof Jiang on YouTube will keep crying hoarse about how China doesn’t want any new territory, they just want to do business and make more money and nothing else. Meanwhile China does everything possible to economically subjugate other vassal countries over dependant on them like Pakistan or use proxy war tactics on countries like India who do not bend the knee and kiss the Chinese boots.
10
Mr_Coco1234 5 days ago +16
A few engineers provided product support for equipment they provided which is literally their job.
16
babloochoudhury 5 days ago +9
Must be bad equipment, bad support, or both.
9
Furiosachan 5 days ago +40
So India beat 2 countries? sorta...kinda...
40
NoPerformance4830 5 days ago +9
calling it a war is just media sensationalism it was something closer to a skirmish imo and you can't exactly 'beat' another nation when you didnt even declare war
9
regal107 5 days ago +10
Pakistan is lovely country, but it's relevant only because of China these days lol
10
Moral-Relativity 4 days ago +2
Slow news day huh? It would be extremely weird if China refused to provide technical support after selling Pakistan defense equipment. Plus it's a good learning opportunity.
2
needefsfolder 5 days ago +4
I thought they were allied as BRICS
4
babloochoudhury 5 days ago +39
BRICS is not a defense pact. It's more focused on economic cooperation.
39
obeytheturtles 5 days ago +16
It's barely even that.
16
Argues_with_ignorant 5 days ago +2
Given their aspirations, which I believe eventually includes conquering of large swaths of india as well, they'd be foolish to not support the weakening of a regional rival. Not to mention the amount of data they'd surely have gathered from this. Formal complaints from india would naturally be expected, but are unlikely to go anywhere. China doesn't frequently give a shit when they abuse their neighbors, and will probably deflect or try to act like a victim. India is also unlikely to pursue more punitive measurements against China, it's not in their economic interests to do so.
2
DDoubleDDog 5 days ago +3
All China accomplished was to show the world how poorly Chinese equipment performs in battle.
3
← Back to Board