… longest Self-serving justice… there fixed it.
\*edit
Jeepers, thanks everyone.
9062
supercyberlurker4 days ago
+1925
My first memory of him was something about his sexual harassment of colleagues and underlings, at his initial hearings.
Since then he has only become an even bigger a******.
1925
MisteeLoo4 days ago
+1085
Anita Hill told the truth.
Edit: thanks for the glitter!
1085
Thizzenie4 days ago
+304
Joe Biden saved his job smh
304
mikemflash4 days ago
+40
The irony of that.....you're right. All I can do is SMH.
40
Yashema4 days ago
+47
As if any conservative appointee would have been better.
47
thatsnotwait4 days ago
+214
He and Alito are noticably more conservative than the others, moreso when you consider that nominees weren't *quite* as partisan as they are now back when he was nominated.
Plus it would be nice if we hadn't set a precedent that sexual abusers on the court were fine.
214
Yashema4 days ago
+86
Thomas was the start of the Heritage Foundation approved list of justices. There was going to be a staunch Conservative elected no matter what. Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas are equally partisan.
86
jigokubi3 days ago
+17
Whenever there's a decision with two insane dissenting opinions it's always those two. Every damn time.
17
lotrfish4 days ago
+54
George H.W. Bush's other Supreme Court appointee was David Souter, who became a reliable liberal vote.
54
Yashema4 days ago
+39
That's why he was pressured to select Thomas. He was Republican revenge for Bush Sr failing to be partisan.
39
QuickAltTab3 days ago
+5
Actually, given this record, its likely *any* conservative *would* have been better, they probably would have left sooner, maybe even during a democratic president's term.
5
Carrot_10753 days ago
+4
Souter, also appointed by HW Bush, was ideologically centrist. Thomas is just a menace
4
AcousticOnomatopoeia4 days ago
+132
And, strangely enough, Joe Biden fucked her over bad.
Horrible job as a chair, Republicans walked all over him and Anita and smeared her with bullshit, he had no balls at all, and he's the reason we have Clarence Thomas.
Joe Biden's legacy is no discharge of student loans thru bankruptcy, Clarence Thomas, allowing Trump to get us here, and being an old demented fool.
132
non-squitr4 days ago
+133
So much more - not codifying abortion rights, not pursuing criminal charges against Trump, not balancing the Supreme Court.
He wasn't a bad president per se, but I think his legacy will become more and more tarnished the further we get away from maga.
133
Mathfanforpresident4 days ago
+121
He did his job of keeping the status quo completely unchallenged.
121
impulsekash4 days ago
+85
Democrats refuse to read the room. Obama won because there was strong desire for change. Bernie put up a legitimate challenge to Hillary because there was a desire for change. Trump in 2016 won because there was a desire for change.
Then Biden wins in 2016 and Dems assumed everyone wanted normalcy, when reality we wanted to end the lunacy. So when the status quo resumed Trump was able to win again because there was a strong desire for change.
And reminder to all, don't throw your hands up in the air and give up because both sides are the same. Get involved in local, grassroots movements. Support candidates you want through primaries. And keep in mind it can take several election cycles for your preferred candidates to get elected so keep supporting them between elections.
85
fondledbydolphins4 days ago
+33
They're not refusing to read the room. They're getting paid to do nothing.
Don't blame people for listening to the "loudest" incentive - that's what humans do.
If voters were actually losing their minds it would speak louder than those donations.
33
impulsekash4 days ago
+36
> If voters were actually losing their minds it would speak louder than those donations.
We live in post Citizens United. Voters don't matter anymore.
36
fondledbydolphins4 days ago
+13
That may be true.
Even if it is, they weren’t doing shit *when it did matter*.
CU was just a solidification of that precedent.
13
FOSSnaught4 days ago
+9
The argument there is that it's what normally happens during a first term. So much damage has been done though.
9
impulsekash4 days ago
+15
Synema thumb down did incalculable amount of damage to this country.
15
Mirageswirl4 days ago
+4
Yea, that was his explicit promise to wealthy donors. Promises made, promises kept.
https://www.salon.com/2019/06/19/joe-biden-to-rich-donors-nothing-would-fundamentally-change-if-hes-elected/
4
MasterMentorJr4 days ago
+26
Also cost Dems the 2024 election. He had no business running for president again
26
IGingerbreadman4 days ago
+45
There was no way he was getting any of that done with the slim margins democrats had. Even with more democrats he wouldn’t have gotten it done. We can be on the blame one person train, most politicians have been complicit in this damn republican led train.
45
calling-all-comas4 days ago
+36
I think Biden is kinda Rutherford B Hayes v2.0. I toured Hayes' house last year and was surprised to see so many similarities between him and Biden.
Hayes presidency was marked by Reconstruction and ever increasing oligarchy in the nation. Based on his private diary entries and letters, Hayes genuinely believed in trying to make black lives better in the south and trying to rid DC of oligarchs' influence in politics. However with both house of congress and the Supreme Court against him he was a pretty ineffective president overall.
In Biden's farewell address he warned that the oligarchy was taking over America; which it's clear he often ran into problems with. I think Biden, like Hayes, was a well meaning president who may have been a good president if he were elected into a more favorable situation.
36
lanicorain4 days ago
+6
I think you just described a horrible president.
6
SeductiveSunday3 days ago
+3
> So much more - not codifying abortion rights
Voting Rights Act was codified. It wasn't saved because of it.
3
rustytiredchicken693 days ago
+3
His first year or two was great, but all went down hill after Oct 7 and then insisting on running again and then backing out with only a few months to go.
3
Tricky-Efficiency7094 days ago
+6
He did vote against him though.
6
PatReady4 days ago
+8
Now do Trump.
8
true-skeptic3 days ago
+4
She had no reason not to.
4
shuknjive3 days ago
+3
And way back then I knew it. I knew he did it and it was terrible what happened to Anita Hill.
3
typhoidtimmy4 days ago
+64
And here is a nice little addendum on how f****** petty he was:
Once he got into the seat, he sat there silent…..FOR TEN YEARS. No comments on cases uttered into record, no questions, nothing.
Yes he has every right to do that. But here is the thing: Pages working under him told of asking him about it and he pretty much admitted that he was not doing shit as ‘revenge’ for the hearings.
Also admitted that he would take every opportunity to sink any Democratic led case for it as well.
Yea rumors and all that but have you seen his record?
The joke on him is he is looking for a way to argue back black people to 3/5’s a vote if Republicans allow it. Who knows if that is a joke nowadays judging by what’s going on.
64
jsong1234 days ago
+9
He had a mentor. One of the other justices.
9
Carrot_10753 days ago
+14
Sexual harassment and then he became a mute for the next 15 years or so. Said nothing, wrote nothing. Now he’s just available to the highest bidder
14
johnnyribcage4 days ago
+25
I was ten and I remember it pretty well. The main thing I remember is “Long Dong Silver.”
25
Revolutionary-Law3824 days ago
+35
I remember "pubic hairs on Coke cans"
35
texasrigger4 days ago
+8
That was 91, so 35 years ago. I was in 8th grade. I'm a grandfather now and he's still in there.
8
confidential-edu4 days ago
+7
"Pubic hair in my coke."
7
fractalfay3 days ago
+3
He told Anita Hill it looked like there was a pubic hair in his coke, among other things. Glad to see that he’s dedicated his time on the Supreme Court to proving he was exactly as big of a piece of shit as everyone thought.
3
saurus-REXicon4 days ago
+12
Abusing power
12
JohnBrownOH4 days ago
+75
He's a molester and a fascist that deserves nothing more than to be flushed down the toilet like the motherfucking piece of shit he is.
75
kuahara3 days ago
+6
Also, we shouldn't be glorifying someone refusing to give that seat up until they take their last breath. Ginsburg burned us with that c***. If she'd given up her seat, we could have replaced her with someone that wasn't a complete douchebag. Holding it until death screwed everyone.
6
likamuka4 days ago
+7
Like the POTUS
7
Sardonnicus4 days ago
+38
Corrupt traitor
38
tiny_chaotic_evil3 days ago
+3
*he knows the bribes stop as soon as he becomes irrelevant*
3
PorgandLover4 days ago
+9
Longest self-serving
9
Sabertooth7674 days ago
+2743
Thirty-four years.
No one should hold a position of such power for so long, whether you like Thomas as a justice or not. While I agree that their terms should be long enough to insulate them from planning their next move, as it were, life is too long.
Make it 18 years, staggered such that a new justice is appointed every other year. Each House gets one, each President two, and each Senate three.
2743
I_Am_No_One_1234 days ago
+922
Thomas is on record stating that he intends to serve a 43 year term as retribution against the mean liberals who voted against his confirmation.
922
ZanthrinGamer4 days ago
+603
it really does feel like he's on a lifelong revenge tour against... humanity? I've never seen anyone who just seems so bitter and misanthropic.
603
ChronoLink994 days ago
+383
He hates himself because he is black. It's so obvious.
A self-hating black man. He's just a senile uncle ruckus.
383
Vhu3 days ago
+169
Behind the Bastards did a fun [deep dive](https://open.spotify.com/episode/4IdXMBM0JncdUDGY1ipzu7?si=4IeUhRezTMe5GX-i72W5kA) into his background.
He literally used the fact that *he felt out of place in college* as a basis for overturning Affirmative Action.
Truly Uncle Ruckus incarnate. Self-hatred so strong it becomes everyone else’s problem.
169
Tempesta_00973 days ago
+26
What??? F*** this dude
26
TheAngriestChair4 days ago
+39
Hates himself and everyone else will suffer for it.
39
Da_full_monty4 days ago
+25
Hes a disgrace to his race.
25
Thorough_Good_Man4 days ago
+31
the human race too
31
Sikirash3 days ago
+4
Same applies as Carlin said about Colin Powell.
He is openly white. He just happens to be black.
4
HerculesIsMyDad3 days ago
+20
He has to have the ego of all egos. He got embarrassed a little while being given one of the best jobs in the world for life. Any normal person would take that W and move on. He decided to become a prick of historical proportions. Didn't say anything in hearings for like 10 years. Intentionally rules against anything that might benefit his own race. Married a fat b**** who tried a coup. Endlessly funnels money into his own pocket and when caught just keeps right on doing it. I think it was less than a month ago he gave a shoutout to the big donor who has lined his pockets at some speech he was giving. Has probably never experienced a moment of actual joy in over 3 decades. Will die and be forgotten.
20
tomas_shugar4 days ago
+70
He is the **ultimate** affirmative action hire. He knows that the **only** reason he is a Supreme Court Justice is because he is black, conservative, and had the credentials on paper to be a Justice.
70
theLoneliestAardvark4 days ago
+196
He should be impeached and removed but if he wants to hang on to his seat and die when Democrats are in control of replacing him then power to him I guess.
196
Podo134 days ago
+103
The theoretical moment the Dems win the election, if the Senate is still majority MAGA, there is a 100% chance Thomas and Alito are retiring and forcing in 2 new Trump appointees.
The supermajority absolutely has to be broken through votes in a few months or we're all extra fucked. And this week's primaries in a few states aren't all roses for indicators of that happening.
103
C_Coolidge4 days ago
+28
What's to stop them from doing the same thing if they do lose their super majority this year? Couldn't they just resign this year and appoint new judges before the Republicans leave office?
28
Podo134 days ago
+19
Oh I think that's definitely on the table. They just have to hope that every seat lost will stay loyal and not pull a McCain by finally doing what's right by blocking the candidates before their seats officially swap in January.
But this midterm is extra important because it has the largest disparity between Dem(13)/Rep(22) seats of the cycle. There's more seats to possibly lose and that means the more unknowns when it comes to getting stuff through.
Edit: Though I think projections are still for a fairly even senate at the moment. A lot of the seats up for grabs this round are from very red/blue states. There's only a couple that seem possible to flip.
19
Desecratr4 days ago
+18
I think you're underestimating the egos of Justices. You do not make it to that bench without being completely full of yourself.
I'm not sure they can help themselves and will end up not retiring, regardless of who wins. Especially Thomas. Two more years and he goes down in history books as the longest serving Justice. You think he'd give that up for the good of the conservative movement? I doubt it.
This all assumes elections aren't just canceled.
18
Podo134 days ago
+21
That is also true. RBG fucked the country quite a bit by not retiring a decade earlier.
21
sonic_couth4 days ago
+3
Isn’t there some kind of Amendment solution that could fix that? Trump referenced it once, but I can’t quite remember which it was…
3
BoleroMuyPicante3 days ago
+3
It's extraordinarily unlikely Dems take the Senate in November, but if they somehow do you can bet Alito and Thomas will both resign the day after the election so their replacements can be confirmed before control of the Senate changes on January 3rd.
3
badwolf424 days ago
+25
Instead he’ll get a new gifted motor coach as a parting gift.
25
PYTN4 days ago
+6
I mean I'll fundraise to buy him 3 if he'll retire while Dems are in power.
6
padizzledonk4 days ago
+3
Ill also contribute to the "Bribe Thomas to get the f*** out" fund
3
m1k3hunt4 days ago
+26
"The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years, and I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years."
26
LoafRVA4 days ago
+9
Which totally allows him to remove biases
9
Tibreaven4 days ago
+90
Something like 20 years feels reasonable. It's long enough that their career should be basically over by then, especially given their average appointment age. So even if they try to leverage their role for post-position gains, they're only likely to be able to take advantage of it for a few years.
There's also an option where they're forced to retire at the age of average life expectancy in the US or something, so no matter when they're appointed, they can't stay past 78 or so.
Combine the two and you'd have a pretty safe way to avoid ancient SC justices holding their seats well into their 80s or 90s.
90
blaqsupaman4 days ago
+14
I feel like there still needs to be some amount of unpredictability to it so they can't strategically plan their retirements on who's in office at the time.
14
nachosmind4 days ago
+32
Or maybe Democrats should get as angry as their constituents and pursue criminal charges against Republicans and everyone that enabled them.
32
fieldsRrings4 days ago
+105
The House has no say on SCOTUS appointments. Only the Senate and President.
Which is why it will always lean conservative. Every state gets 2 Senators, regardless of population. So it's extremely difficult for Dems to get a meaningful majority in the Senate.
105
BoardsofCanada34 days ago
+63
The Senate was 57D/43R when Thomas was confirmed.
63
pm_me_ur_bamboozle3 days ago
+13
we dont do facts here
13
KingFebirtha3 days ago
+12
Here's a fact: Over 30 years ago, when Thomas was confirmed, we had a different concept of red vs blue states and the political demographics of each state. In the 1990 midterms, democrats won senate seats in Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Iowa, and Nebraska. Also, we had 100 million less people.
It is a completely different ballgame today, and yes, the senate has a fundamental conservative advantage like the OP said. And unless things drastically change, it will remain that way for the foreseeable future.
12
GenSecHonecker3 days ago
+4
Yeah and a lot of them were southern Democrats which functionally no longer exist
4
Constant-Plant-93783 days ago
+6
Thomas should have been arrested on 06/21/2021 for conspiracy to launch a coup and overturn a lawful election.
Unfortunately, Biden proved complicit with the coup's orchestrators.
6
ObviousExit94 days ago
+3
First amend Article 5 of the constitution to make it easier to make changes like this. Otherwise you might as well be talking about making yourself king of Mars.
3
Frank_the_Mighty4 days ago
+290
This f***** needs to stay alive for the next ~1000 days
290
Big_lt4 days ago
+96
Well if Dems take the Senate it won't matter
96
Bakedfresh4204 days ago
+79
They’ll have the period between November and January and Mitch follows no rules when it comes to the SCOTUS
79
TheHykos4 days ago
+35
Mitch isn’t in charge anymore, thankfully. John Thune is now.
35
Bakedfresh4204 days ago
+24
Even Mitch has been voting against some of the MAGA bills lately, nothing has improved.
24
JimmyKillsAlot3 days ago
+4
Well yeah, he announced this is his last term and he is not running for re-election so he has nothing to lose at suddenly doing the right thing a few times.
4
the_platypus_king4 days ago
+14
Same shit, different ass
14
fe-and-wine4 days ago
+20
Not that it particularly matters because I think they’re all in on the McConnell brand of ratfuckery these days, but Mitch doesn’t have the keys anymore - John Thune is the current Senate majority leader.
20
skitchbeatz4 days ago
+8
Big if. Big big if
8
AngledLuffa3 days ago
+3
i'm not saying give up, but we would need to flip 4 seats, and that just seems incredibly unlikely
even getting ME and NC is going to be a solid "win". all the other states are very solid red. TX, NE, AK... not sure where we get 2 more seats
3
Rooooben4 days ago
+7
Thats my hope, that they can’t convince him to retire before November, or that they are so confident in their election rigging attempts that they don’t try to get him and Alito to retire before the election.
7
KamaIsLife4 days ago
+731
He doesn't want to retire because then he would lose all the perks from his rich white friends who pay for better judgments.
731
apurimac7774 days ago
+142
He was so close to retiring before he just magically happened to meet and become "best friends" with Harlan Crow though
So glad after a few vacations he saw reason and decided to stay
/s
142
Se7en_speed4 days ago
+17
I want the court to be expanded for a lot of reasons, but one of the top ones is so that he can be made an irrelevant voice in the minority and get to watch his bribes dry up.
17
HolycommentMattman3 days ago
+3
In all seriousness, we should be happy for that. Him retiring opens up a spot to put in a better justice. Right now, that would allow Trump to get another Gorsuch or Kavanaugh. But since Thomas is so self-serving, him sticking around opens a chance for Democrats to replace him.
3
xtheproschx4 days ago
+7
John Oliver(HBO) even offered 1 million to retire and then clarence can get his beloved RV so him and his spouse can travel the country.
That was 3? Years ago 😢
7
BOHIFOBRE4 days ago
+21
You mean his owners?
21
bong_residue4 days ago
+10
I’m genuinely surprised this dude hasn’t tried bleaching his skin or some shit. He wants to be white so f****** bad it hurts.
10
Nayko2144 days ago
+440
Term and age limits on the court now please. No one should be allowed to dictate policy and legislation for that long. Especially one as corrupt as Clarence.
440
Big_lt4 days ago
+91
Every public office. It's not ageism when there are already minimums to run for offices.
It should be something like 2 terms for president (8 years. 10 under special circumstances). 2 terms for senator (12 years) and 5 terms for congressperson (10 years).
As for SCOTUS they are voted in however I would say upon age 70(?) they will need to step down. No term limits here
91
Reylun4 days ago
+12
Should be whatever retirement age is imo. They should be forced to retire
12
shellexyz4 days ago
+15
Presidential limit is already 8, 10 under special circumstances. (VP ascending just over 2y into the term, then two successful campaigns. I’m not clear how things would go if you ascended to the presidency twice and attempted to run for the big seat too.
President Alice dies just over 2y into office, VP Bob ascends. Gets elected on his own the next election.
Bob decides not to run (or loses) the next one, but is elected/named VP in the future. Again, rises to the presidency just over two years into office.
Can Bob run on his own again?
15
brutinator4 days ago
+3
> It's not ageism when there are already minimums to run for offices.
Unfortunately ageism, as defined in the legislature, applies to discrimination against people 40 or older. The only justifications for age-based retirement is when there is a measurable safety risk directly attributable to age (like pilots or the military). Forced retirements in all other cases is against the law.....
Is what I thought before I looked up the ADEA, and it SPECIFICALLY has a carveout for forced retirement of executives over the age of 65 in high policy-making positions being completely legal, which I think easily fits the majority of goverment.
3
[deleted]4 days ago
+467
[removed]
467
Mojo1414 days ago
+79
Look up got-mine in the dictionary and there he is
79
PatchyWhiskers4 days ago
+42
Not now though... he'd get replaced by a teenager with a law textbook.
42
threenil4 days ago
+32
“Supreme Court Justice nominee, Nick Shirley, known for his YouTube channel where he barely strings together sentences of 5 letter multi-syllabic words, sits before the nomination committee today…”
32
Rumpled_Imp4 days ago
+127
He serves justice? News to me. I'm pretty sure he only serves himself.
127
3nterShift3 days ago
+12
It's so bizzare to me that a supposed democracy has a lifetime vizier position where people make decisions impacting the whole nation for possibly centuries based on vibes and no amount of blatant corruption, partisanship or moral dubiousness can disqualify you from your seat.
12
Novasauce94 days ago
+96
Anita Hill showed us who he really is. He never should have been appointed and his tenure on the court, like Kavanagh’s, is a national disgrace.
96
mompos4 days ago
+14
I still have my "I believe Anita" button pinned to my purse.
14
RicRacer4 days ago
+17
That is something Biden f'd up on.
17
Weazerdogg4 days ago
+10
Just another sexual assaulter who has no right working for the public. Which I guess he understands, as he does NOT work for the public. This dude also has the distinction of being one of Biden's greatest failures. I was in college when Joe defended this guy to the very end. Bet he wishes he had kept his mouth shut now.
10
DreamsiclesPlz4 days ago
+50
And the US has been worse off for it. Corrupt piece of shit.
50
FillFrontFloor3 days ago
+12
Funny enough, I was helping someone prep for the citizenship test. An official question is "why are the supreme court justices allowed a lifetime appointment?" An official answer is I shit you not "so they can stay away from politics"
12
awildboop3 days ago
+3
That's also the "correct" answer per civics class. It was intended to protect the court from being too heavily influenced by politics, right? Essentially preventing "vote to allow this and I'll make sure you get reelected" or "if you don't do X, we'll make sure you never serve after this term"
We REALLY should've had a way to recall justices as citizens
3
khalbur4 days ago
+60
Multigenerational society destroyer.
60
Lost_Birthday_31384 days ago
+4
There's a great Behind the Bastards episode on this scumbag. He's truly terrible.
4
MrTwatFart4 days ago
+70
The court is such a joke. He should’ve had to step down so long ago. He’s so f****** corrupt.
70
LittleKitty2354 days ago
+39
If he steps down now Trump will just appoint yet another a****** judge who is younger.
Democrats really need to expand the court
39
By_Way_of_Deception4 days ago
+14
His wife supported the January 6 riot. He often just sits like a bump on a log, never asking questions. His connections to wealthy, powerful and not disinterested people are questionable. He is not doing any great service to our nation, that is for certain.
14
Tigerlily_Dreams2 days ago
+6
I've seen Crunchwraps more supreme than this court.
6
sp_404 days ago
+19
All my homies hate Clarence Thomas
19
Spyk1244 days ago
+17
Remember when a bombshell report came out that he was openly taking bribes from conservative billionaires ? They bought his mother’s house and paid for his many vacations?
And our system enabled us to do absolutely nothing. Ridiculous.
17
tubbo4 days ago
+16
clarence thomas scientifically proves that assholes live forever
16
Matman1614 days ago
+26
The craziest part of that is that Donald Trump raped children with Jeffrey Epstein
26
Proud-Masterpiece-823 days ago
+4
to quote Sonic Youth:
"Black robe and swill / I believe Anita Hill / The judge will rot in hell"
\-Youth Against Facism(feat. Ian MacKaye) 1992
4
ogo_pogo3 days ago
+5
Mannn F*** CT, he’s a traitor
5
VikingBlade3 days ago
+5
If only we had known what a garbage human being he was before his confirmation….
….oh wait, we did. And he got confirmed anyway.
5
creminibobini3 days ago
+5
F*** him entirely. Anita Hill still deserves justice.
5
Tee_i_am4 days ago
+18
Never should've made it after that Anita Hill debacle.
18
Weary_Necessary_24344 days ago
+9
I loved how they tried to make it about racism when the accuser was black just like him.
9
flat54 days ago
+8
Should have just listened to Anita Hill. It was really that simple.
8
Outcast_LG1 day ago
+4
I only have TOS violations to say about this 🦝
4
superstevo784 days ago
+6
Can't shame someone who has no shame...
The dude took millions for conservative activists who had cases before the court. He should have been impeached decades ago
6
ibeatyou93 days ago
+7
He should have been removed thirty years ago
7
darkjad3n4 days ago
+13
Pubic hair on the coke can
13
AmericaVotedTrump4 days ago
+18
All these A-holes defying high cholesterol risks.
18
KingDarius894 days ago
+3
Should have taken that RV.
3
Balrog714 days ago
+3
“Serving” is doing some mighty heavy lifting
3
Ocean8984 days ago
+3
He should be serving a prison sentence for bribery.
3
60wattsoul4 days ago
+3
Already saving piss for his grave
3
StableGeniusCovfefe4 days ago
+3
Uncle Clarence belongs in prison
3
Oregon-Pilot4 days ago
+3
Term limits for these greedy bought-and-sold fuckers
3
gjboomer4 days ago
+3
And we’re all worse off for it.
3
MichaelHunt0094 days ago
+3
Best SC justice that money can buy..
3
gnanny024 days ago
+3
Anita Hill. We should not be the least bit surprised about Epstein. We have been on that road for years.
3
PickleCipher4 days ago
+3
30+ years of f****** up the country
3
dayshiftpremadonna2 days ago
+3
He has to go down as one of the most inept and crooked judges of all time.. he has taken millions in gifts and him and his wife are only loyal to MAGA...
3
Mr_Ergdorf1 day ago
+3
And the world is much worse for it.
3
SnowPudgy1 day ago
+3
Serving who exactly because it’s not the people.
3
Consistent-Resort2701 day ago
+3
The longest sexual harassing judge.
3
mompos4 days ago
+8
Coin operated Clarence. I believe Anita.
8
Professional_Dr_774 days ago
+5
To the detriment of everyone
5
nyjac7574 days ago
+4
The most corrupt supreme court justice in history is more like it
4
Romston4 days ago
+7
The most corrupt a****** of the supreme Court as well.
7
alu54214 days ago
+3
Millions in cash from bribes and a lifetime appointment and a racist against his own people. What a life
3
TheBigC874 days ago
+3
Clarence Thomas is the ultimate DEI hire.
Literally got the position because they wanted a black conservative justice to replace Thurgood Marshall and he was the only one available. He's one of the most disgraceful justices to ever serve and replaced one of the best Supreme Court justices of all time.
3
PokeYrMomStanley4 days ago
+5
He needs to f****** go to jail like the rest of the corrupt fucks in the gov
5
worldscollice4 days ago
+3
This is just more reason to have term limits for these clowns. Thomas is just as corrupt as some of the others.
3
hopeful73214 days ago
+4
His corruption is off of the scales. Needs to go!!!
4
Big_Primrose2 days ago
+3
This corrupt pig should never have been seated.
3
DaisyHotCakes4 days ago
+7
….and the most BLATANTLY corrupt. The Supreme Court is a f****** joke.
7
Reyjr4 days ago
+2
We need serving limits.
2
BubbaTheGoat4 days ago
+2
For this court that’s like being the second longest skid mark on Trump’s underwear.
2
Cama_lama_dingdong4 days ago
+2
He only serves himself and his bank account. But that is a long time to lack integrity!
2
Barfly20074 days ago
+2
Hes the worssssstttttt
2
mightbedylan4 days ago
+2
He's a f****** b******
2
SirWishbone4 days ago
+2
Corruption doesn't die.
2
Apart-Steak-71834 days ago
+2
He needs to retire now not later
2
waffle_iron_maiden4 days ago
+2
And congratulations to him as he's become the biggest b****** in the supreme court too
2
TomUpNort4 days ago
+2
To celebrate, he's going to accept even more bribes from the rich and powerful.
2
Rurumo6664 days ago
+2
The SCOTUS Pube Gremlin has taught generations of interns to never leave a drink unattended.
2
tyedge4 days ago
+2
If Clarence had his way, he’d only get 3/5ths credit for his tenure
2
spatula4 days ago
+2
“Serving” isn’t really the right word is it.
2
No_Statistician82864 days ago
+2
34 years! This should never be allowed
2
m3e8x3e84 days ago
+2
Longest serving doorstop.
2
JacoRamone4 days ago
+2
And the number one scumbag.
2
troveofcatastrophe4 days ago
+2
Long enough to destroy the court. Kudos, you corrupt clown.
2
oldmanbelly4 days ago
+2
And he hates black people. Two facts that go together.
2
fav4534 days ago
+2
I can't look at him without seeing Uncle Ruckus
2
delicateanodyne4 days ago
+2
why does evil live so damn long
2
AloneChapter4 days ago
+2
When you are given so much why leave ? Gravy is really hard to give up
2
Corporate-Scum4 days ago
+2
Now that’s an injustice to the American people.
2
Im_gumby_damnit4 days ago
+2
And the biggest a******
2
garmannarnar4 days ago
+2
The party we will have in the streets when…
2
Builderwill4 days ago
+2
Only the good die young, they say.
2
SymbiSpidey4 days ago
+2
There NEEDs to be term/age limits on Supreme Court justices. Why the f*** do these unelected fossils get to set legal precedents until they're on their death bed?
2
cosettemeetsmarius4 days ago
+2
The biggest POS to milk a job in history.
2
O-parker4 days ago
+2
He needs to be replaced
2
strugglz4 days ago
+2
He's such a stain on jurisprudence.
2
abstrickler4 days ago
+2
We need term, and age limits for all elected and appointed officials
2
UrsaMajor7th4 days ago
+2
Is that the one who put his pubes on a Coke can?
2
Olden_Grey_18894 days ago
+2
Longest serving a******?
2
Danktizzle4 days ago
+2
Remember guys, there is always someone more corrupt out there. And I have complete certainty that he will be replacing this dude soon.
198 Comments