· 98 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 23, 2026 at 4:24 PM

'Clueless' Sequel Series No Longer in Development at Peacock

Posted by Anchor_Aways


‘Clueless’ Sequel Series With Alicia Silverstone No Longer in Development at Peacock (EXCLUSIVE)
Variety
‘Clueless’ Sequel Series With Alicia Silverstone No Longer in Development at Peacock (EXCLUSIVE)
The "Clueless" sequel series, which would see Alicia Silverstone reprise the role of Cher Horowitz, is not moving forward at Peacock

🚩 Report this post

98 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
AMA_requester Apr 23, 2026 +212
For the best really, people have nostalgia and appreciate Clueless but I don't really think that translates to wanting to see what this now in her late 40s early 50s year old character is doing now.
212
QuasiJudicialBoofer Apr 23, 2026 +118
Here's the pitch : Clueless; but no 90s, no high school, no hopeful idealism. But it will be called Clueless and we expect a hefty cashgrab
118
lavahot Apr 23, 2026 +20
It will be called "Clued" and will be about how they've started an uprising against the wealthy.
20
MtFuzzmore Apr 23, 2026 +15
There’s already things like Vanderpump or RHW to see how this would turn out.
15
thePinguOverlord Apr 23, 2026 +9
I mean it’s Emma. It is one of those literary classic contemporary adaptations. 10 Things I Hate About You is my favourite of it though.
9
monty_kurns Apr 23, 2026 +8
Clueless, 10 Things I Hate About You, O, and Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet…the mid-90s to very early 2000s had some banger modern adaptations of classics!
8
xOHSOx Apr 23, 2026
Yeah exactly no thanks. I rather they make something new that’s maybe inspired by it and other movies but let’s get back to making original movies not remakes or unoriginal sequels.
0
HotBrownFun Apr 24, 2026 +1
she's still clueless, she was eating random berries from the street not too long ago. Her chat was freaking out thinking she'd killed herself since she was incommunicado for a day.
1
ImLaunchpadMcQuack Apr 23, 2026 +287
Good.
287
realblush Apr 23, 2026 +27
2 different versions of the musical even flopped, that IP is dead
27
nowhereman136 Apr 23, 2026 +15
No to a sequel series Maybe to a reboot that does what Clueless did but with a different Jane Austen novel
15
lefrench75 Apr 23, 2026 +10
“Emma” was particularly well suited to the high school setting because Emma was a total queen bee, but other Austen stories in a modern setting would be fun too. “Fire Island” à la “Pride and Prejudice with gay men” is a great example and perfectly applies Austen’s humour and mode of social commentary to a different demographic and setting.
10
VampireHunterAlex Apr 23, 2026 +84
Has any of these ‘years later’ reboot series worked? And i dont mean just lasted a handful of seasons, i mean moreso that if you’re a fan of the OG, then you MUST WATCH the revival.
84
landalezjr Apr 23, 2026 +160
The new Scrubs reboot is actually quite good. However this is not the norm and most of these have not worked well.
160
steve-d Apr 23, 2026 +52
It helps Bill Lawrence is involved.
52
TrapperJean Apr 23, 2026 +23
Him and Mike Schur are so f****** good and the best creators/directors going right now Scrubs, The Office, P&R, The Good Place, Man on the Inside, Ted Lasso, Rooster, Spin City, Cougar Town, insane catalog between them *how the hell did i forget Shrinking?
23
nearcatch Apr 23, 2026 +5
Left Shrinking and Bad Monkey off that list for Lawrence. Ted Lasso really snowballed into a second career stage for him.
5
TrapperJean Apr 23, 2026 +3
Omg I cant believe I left Shrinking out, I f****** love Shrinking
3
raysofdavies Apr 23, 2026 +17
He is so good. You can see how Ted Lasso ent so downhill after he left.
17
steve-d Apr 23, 2026 +5
For real - he's got the Midas Touch.
5
Burrito-mancer Apr 23, 2026 +4
Shrinking is the one of the best comedies to come out this decade
4
softrockstarr Apr 23, 2026 +2
He wasn't really involved, though.
2
Suchgallbladder Apr 23, 2026 +14
It’s not a reboot. It’s a continuation.
14
LiteHedded Apr 24, 2026 +1
clueless wasn't going to be either...
1
palinsafterbirth Apr 23, 2026 -11
Don't forget this is the 2nd attempt at a Scrubs reboot
-11
CrusaderLyonar Apr 23, 2026 +54
The first "reboot" wasn't actually a reboot it was a spinoff that aired the following year after season 8.
54
Mrchristopherrr Apr 23, 2026 +17
Learning some of the backstory for it kind of gave me some newfound respect for Bill Lawrence. Essentially he was muscled into making a spin off, then to hamfist it into being season 9. It was the height of the recession though so he opted to take the hit so the whole crew could keep their jobs
17
Kevbot1000 Apr 23, 2026 +66
King of the Hill and Scrubs are the two most recent examples of revivals done right.
66
ositola Apr 23, 2026 +14
Xmen 97
14
mike_pants Apr 23, 2026 +1
That one isn't a "years later" show, though. It's continuing the plot of the original series.
1
Mattyzooks Apr 23, 2026 +35
Twin Peaks.
35
LADYBIRD_HILL Apr 23, 2026 +7
Close the thread
7
RandomPersonBob Apr 23, 2026 +57
Malcom in the Middle was really good, probably because it was short and just the right amount. I forgot how much I loved that show and all the actors just nailed it, especially Reese.
57
shifty1032231 Apr 23, 2026 +7
I thought it was okay. There are some things that I didn't like but I overall enjoyed it.
7
lrodhubbard Apr 23, 2026 +38
Malcolm in the Middle, Scrubs, The Conners... Futurama... Even Peacock's own Saved By The Bell reboot. Yes it can work with the right team.
38
thatisnotmyknob Apr 23, 2026 +30
King of the Hill
30
_kvl_ Apr 23, 2026 +10
Kings of the Hill surprised me with just how good it was. One of the best revivals in recent years.
10
Kevbot1000 Apr 23, 2026 +17
Worst thing about the Saved by the Bell reboot was the theme song. Literally everything else worked for me.
17
BenderBenRodriguez Apr 23, 2026 +2
Futurama I would agree with in terms of the first revival on Comedy Central but the Hulu run has been a little rough unfortunately.
2
EchoesofIllyria Apr 23, 2026 +2
It’s funny. People said exactly the same about the CC revival when it came out. Now it’s treated in the same breath, or similarly, to the original Fox run compared to the Hulu run. I can only assume that when the Hulu revival is cancelled and it comes back again elsewhere, the Hulu run will also be lumped in with the other two when people say the newest version is rough lol
2
BenderBenRodriguez Apr 23, 2026 +1
I mean, for what it's worth I was there and I remember arguing with people about it lol. FWIW I do think the Fox run (more so specifically the third and fourth production seasons) are better than the Comedy Central run, but I thought people were too hard on those and would debate people about them. I also don't know that their reputation has totally come around...I mean, they were never THAT badly received but I still hear complaints about the "EyePhone" episode and such to this day. I think there's at least some persistent feeling that they weren't as good as the initial run. But I personally really enjoyed them and thought they were mostly pretty consistently funny and worth watching. I tried to be optimistic with the Hulu run, but in this case it really does feel like it came back a little "wrong" and despite a few good episodes I'd be hard pressed to name anything that I really think is among the best they've done (the CC run didn't hit it out of the park as often as Fox, but there were episodes like The Late Phillip J. Fry which absolutely did hit those highs), and a number of episodes are just genuinely weak and sometimes a little baffling to me that anyone thought they would be funny. Like they just finally hit that point where the people involved got a little too old and lost their edge for it or something. I do get what you're saying, but it's a thing people often say about The Simpsons and which proves to be less and less true in that case, given the long tail of less well-received seasons that has eventually caught up to them. Like, it's true there were some people that thought seasons 4 and 5 of The Simpsons represented a significant downturn and now those seasons are pretty universally considered classics, but as you go along in those seasons you do eventually hit a wall where no matter how old those seasons get they haven't been retroactively claimed to that extent (i.e. season 20 is now something like 16/17 years ago and while I'm sure there are people who grew up with it and love it, on the whole you'd be hard pressed to find a lot of people who think it's as good as season 4). We'll see, but I feel like Futurama has maybe just finally hit that point.
1
EchoesofIllyria Apr 23, 2026 +1
Tbf I was mostly being flippant with my “prediction” lol I agree people were overly harsh on the CC seasons (I was there too, it made interesting reading lol). But then I also think people are being overly harsh on the Hulu seasons. Maybe I’m just easily pleased, but I feel like there’s been enough to enjoy to be glad it exists and if my memory was wiped I’m not sure I’d notice a difference between its middling episodes and at least the CC middling episodes. The Simpsons is a little different because it’s never gone away for people to miss it, but there have definitely been periods that people have cited as improvements, though not to the level of the classic seasons. I wouldn’t know tbh, I haven’t watched anything from like the last 20 years outside of the movie. I suspect a lot of CC’s image rehab in recent years came from having a pitch-perfect finale. Sticking the landing can do a lot to improve a reputation, I reckon.
1
jake3988 Apr 23, 2026 +4
> Malcolm in the Middle, Scrubs, The Conners... Futurama... Even Peacock's own Saved By The Bell reboot. Yes it can work with the right team. To be fair the 'revival' for The Conners was the roseanne season and that sucked hard. After they kicked out Roseanne and toned down the over the top politics and it settled in, turned into a really freaking great show. I also really enjoyed the one-year revival of Mad About You. I also enjoyed the Will and Grace revival. I've also been finishing up the 3rd season of the Anamaniacs that they revived. Also great.
4
[deleted] Apr 23, 2026 -3
[deleted]
-3
explosivo85 Apr 23, 2026 +5
Viewership and quality are two different things.
5
paulerxx Apr 23, 2026 +5
Scrubs + Malcom In The Middle both worked, just in the last few months Futurama and King Of The Hill both fit the bill as well.
5
whichwitch9 Apr 23, 2026 +6
Not all are series, but for soft reboots in general the first Jumanji sequel movie, Scrubs, Malcom in the Middle, the Psych movies... there's a handful. But people are happy about them so you don't have the discourse keeping them around the same way bad ones do.
6
BenderBenRodriguez Apr 23, 2026 +2
Star Trek: The Next Generation (and a couple of the others like DS9 and Voyager). I think that's pretty much it to be honest. Reputedly Twin Peaks too I guess but I still need to finish that.
2
othersbeforeus Apr 23, 2026 +2
Degrassi: The Next Generation was very successful, I watched it as a kid with no knowledge of the original. But that was some time ago.
2
Premislaus Apr 23, 2026 +2
I mean... a fair amount? There was a time when they were almost universally terrible (like video games adaptations), but (like video games adaptations) they drastically improved the last couple of years. At least people here seems to have liked Scrubs, King of the Hill, Malcolm in the Middle.
2
SwagginsYolo420 Apr 23, 2026 +2
The Twin Peaks revival arguably was the greatest season of television ever made, surpassing the original aired seasons.
2
TheCooze Apr 23, 2026 +7
Cobra Kai and Ash vs Evil Dead. Only two that worked imo. The new scrubs is not funny and barely anyone came back for it. New Malcom in the Middie has everybody come back but still not really funny.
7
EchoesofIllyria Apr 23, 2026 +5
Funny is subjective but “barely anyone came back for it” is objectively wrong whether you’re referring to the cast or viewers.
5
TheCooze Apr 23, 2026 -2
Yes not funny is my opinion. Never stated as a fact. I shouldn’t have to add imo to everything I say, use context clues. Turk, JD, and Elliot are the only main returning characters. Carla isn’t even in most of the episodes. Dr Cox is barely there. Janitor only shows up at the end. The Todd and Hooch are barely around for a couple jokes. So how am I wrong?
-2
EchoesofIllyria Apr 23, 2026 +3
Sorry, when I said funny is subjective I meant I wasn’t arguing that part and was gonna focus on the other part. My fault, probably wasn’t clear. Turk, JD and Elliot are 3/4 of the main cast and Carla was only in it so little because of other commitments (same with Cox). They’ve already said both will be back a lot more if the show gets renewed. The Janitor not being there makes perfect sense given how he exited the original run (not to mention his age). Jordan, Todd and Hooch showed up about as much as they did in the original show. Kelso’s long retired, Ted’s actor died. Regardless, “barely anyone came back” is a gross exaggeration and incorrect.
3
TheCooze Apr 23, 2026 -1
Ok so maybe I didn’t choose the best wording. But I stand by the sentiment. Though tbh I haven’t watched the original show in many years. But I would disagree that Jordan, Todd and Hooch are getting the same amount of screen time. Jordan isn’t even there till the end. Hooch got maybe 3(?) jokes in the season. Same with Todd. And whatever reasons are behind others barely being there or not at all doesn’t change the fact that they aren’t. And I guess when I said “main returning characters” I should specify I mean “known characters” who are in most episodes. And all this is made more clear to me after watching the new Malcom episodes which had so many characters come back that there just wasn’t enough time for them all.
-1
EchoesofIllyria Apr 23, 2026 +4
Tbf Jordan would frequently disappear for episodes at a time especially in the first half of the show. She’s only in around half of them overall. 1/10’s on the low side but it wasn’t unusual for her to miss several episodes. Hooch is in *FIVE* episodes in the entire original run (and three of those in season 4). He just made one hell of an impression in those five episodes. The Todd’s the only one you could make a good case should be in more to emulate the original - he appears like 50% more times than Jordan.
4
TheCooze Apr 23, 2026 +1
Well fair enough on hooch and Jordan then. But having 3 of the original main 7 (again I can’t really count cox, carla, janitor as they are essentially guest roles) and having at least 9 new regulars on the show just doesn’t sit right with me. And to be clear, I get why Kelso and Ted didn’t return, but combined with the others the lack of presence is felt more.
1
EchoesofIllyria Apr 23, 2026 +2
Yeah that’s fair. I mean they always had a somewhat rotating supporting cast because of the nature of the interns, but I can see why it might be jarring to have so many at once, especially because of how *modern* these interns are compared to the returning characters. Anyway, I hope it gets renewed and we get more Cox and Carla (didn’t seem like Janitor was sticking around as a regular but who knows)!
2
FlukyS Apr 23, 2026 +1
I quite liked the Malcolm in the Middle miniseries
1
gmark109 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Like any other show, they work when the right people are involved, and don’t work when made for the wrong reasons. There may be disproportionately more examples of the latter, but the “nobody asked for this” excuse is just as bunk here as it is usually.
1
Pugilist12 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Twin Peaks. Party Down.
1
Phallic_Moron Apr 23, 2026 +1
Party Down worked when they did it.  This Clueless remake is a Ron Donald Don't.
1
PejicFilip Apr 23, 2026 +1
Does Cobra Kai count?
1
Luci-Noir Apr 24, 2026 +1
The new Dexter is excellent.
1
jyper Apr 25, 2026 +1
Most of the examples people are giving are continuations. One reboot that really worked was DuckTales 2019
1
Cardude86 Apr 23, 2026
Better Call Saul, The Originals, Futurama, Angel, the 50 NCIS shows, Bosch, Justice League Unlimited, The new Batman series, and I'm sure many more. Although the majority do seem to suck and only last a season.
0
JulianVanderbilt Apr 23, 2026 +3
Better Call Saul in no way fits their category. 
3
violue Apr 23, 2026 +2
I think you're mixing spin-offs with reboots...
2
Mattyzooks Apr 23, 2026 +1
Angel and JLU weren't years later reboots though. They were spinoffs/shows in a TV universes, coming out soon after or during the previous show in the universe. JLU came out right after JL ended which came out soon after Superman/Batman Beyond and aired during Static Shock's run.
1
Purple_Compote_386 Apr 23, 2026
Have you been living under a rock?
0
DrMostlyMittens Apr 23, 2026 +16
AS IF!
16
davidbernhardt Apr 23, 2026 +11
Paul Rudd will still look the same age as the he did in the original even if they wait 10 more years to launch it
11
CrissBliss Apr 23, 2026 +5
I wanted to watch just so I could see Alicia and Paul together again.
5
Mountain_Wafer_9340 Apr 23, 2026 +4
Elevator pitch - so we go again right, but everyone is old and rough and the world is in flames and then about 15 minutes in we dump all the oldies and a load of their kids and such turn out ot be the focus and its about social media and ADHD and it's got this amazing AI written song about something and at the end there is a big BBQ and the kids and the adults all dance together and do wacky faces.
4
bguzewicz Apr 23, 2026 +5
That is probably for the best.
5
Jarita12 Apr 23, 2026 +3
I didn´t even know they were making one. Not everything needs sequel or remake
3
Ok_Tell3168 Apr 23, 2026 +3
Thank god. As if.
3
honey_rainbow Apr 23, 2026 +3
No one even asked for this. So thank goodness.
3
Ikarus3426 Apr 23, 2026 +2
Smart choice. Nothing about how they were going about this made sense.
2
WoodpeckerGingivitis Apr 23, 2026 +2
On Peacock even 🥴
2
violue Apr 23, 2026 +2
Sounds good!
2
TanAllOvaJanAllOva Apr 23, 2026 +2
It’s a sequel to the movie or the show? Either way, picking up nearly 30 yrs later is a choice
2
Jackielegs43 Apr 24, 2026 +2
Good.
2
mike10dude Apr 23, 2026 +1
The ABC and upn series was decent enough
1
blond_nirvana Apr 23, 2026 +2
I was wondering if anyone else remembered the TV show. More than a few actors returned to do the series. Silverstone couldn't because she had a development deal and couldn't reprise her role.
2
Turbulent_Tale6497 Apr 23, 2026 +1
They must have watched The Requin
1
aunty-kelly Apr 23, 2026 +1
They couldn’t find a Jane Austen story that would fit. There’s no sequel to “Emma” right?
1
Strict_Berry7446 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Shocking!
1
BenTramer Apr 23, 2026 +1
Good. Just watch the movie if you’re in the mood for Clueless.
1
Accomplished-Head449 Apr 24, 2026 +1
There's a fantastic new 4K transfer of the movie. That's good enough
1
HankSteakfist Apr 24, 2026 +1
I totally forgot that they already made a Clueless TV series in the 90s.
1
SmooshedLion Apr 24, 2026 +1
Rachel Blanchard IS the better Cher
1
Scottify Apr 24, 2026 +1
Good, now cancel the legal blonde prequel next
1
bigdog701 Apr 25, 2026 +1
Weird.. People are tired of recycled garbage. Didnt see it coming
1
wildcatofthehills Apr 23, 2026 +1
Yes, good. No more shitty tv remakes masquerading as sequels to great films. It literally only worked with Fargo because they just followed the idea of crime in the Midwest. We didnt need a Tewlve Monkeys nor a Snowpiercer tv shows. Let this trend die
1
astroglitch0 Apr 23, 2026 +1
Sometimes(almost always) it is just best to leave things alone.
1
sarbeans9001 Apr 23, 2026 -1
the only revival i can think of that actually worked was... honestly i'm drawing a blank lol. they all feel like cash grabs and clueless specifically feels like something that only works as a 90s time capsule
-1
← Back to Board