Because you need alot of training to know what multiple flashing stop sign are about./s
Also the guy initially lied about having the sun in his eyes.
He got lazy, didn't want to bring his rig to a stop, took a chance and killed 16 young Canadians. Canada was damaged because of him so he deserves to be deported.
You need to stop carrying water for the guy.
1
[deleted]6 days ago
[removed]
0
LearingCenterAlumni6 days ago
+1
No amount of training will make up for a lack of care and complacency. The guy took a chance and through his negligence killed 16 young Canadians.
1
[deleted]6 days ago
[removed]
0
Global_Mud_74736 days ago
+1
It’s irrelevant.
1
LearingCenterAlumni6 days ago
He likeky was and didn't make a difference. The guy wanted to save himself the trouble of bringing his heavy rig to a stop. Turns out you don't need alot of training to know what a stop sign is, toddlers know what to do at a stop sign.
Would you have stopped at that intersection?
0
[deleted]6 days ago
+1
[removed]
1
[deleted]6 days ago
+1
[removed]
1
LearingCenterAlumni6 days ago
>You're claiming adequately training commercial truck drivers doesn't make a difference?
Not when it comes to knowing what to do at a f****** 4 foot wide stop sign. Lol
What do you do when you come up to a stop sign?
0
[deleted]6 days ago
+1
[removed]
1
portageandmainMay 1, 2026
+279
This guy is still in the country?!?
279
johndoe4shoMay 1, 2026
+205
He needs to serve his 8 year sentence instead of just walking free in his home country.
Edit: he’s been out on parole since 2023
205
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+156
[deleted]
156
johndoe4shoMay 1, 2026
+31
That changes things then, I should’ve read the entire article.
31
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+70
[removed]
70
RiajnorMay 1, 2026
+116
I don’t get why the media keeps trying to paint him in a sympathetic light, talking about his emotional distress etc. dude went through a red light, his negligence killed a bunch of kids and injured a lot more. His sentence was jail and then deportation. 8 years and a trip back home is a pretty light outcome when viewed from his victims perspective
116
NorthernFrostyMay 1, 2026
+86
> dude went through a red light,
Dude blew through a flashing stop sign at the intersection of Saskatchewan Highways 35 and 335 while driving at a speed of approximately 100 km/h (60 mph). [This is the intersection](https://www.google.com/maps/@53.1037221,-104.0255998,3a,75y,280.92h,89.2t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1suexWmviJAUjEa8fc5mkIIw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D0.7984479526537172%26panoid%3DuexWmviJAUjEa8fc5mkIIw%26yaw%3D280.920307142301!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDQyOC4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D) (You can see all the memorial markers of the people he killed off the the right)
86
AussieJeffProbstMay 2, 2026
+10
Wow a stop sign with a flashing red light and an overhead stop sign with a flashing red light. Insane they let this guy out
10
CreamyIvyMay 1, 2026
+25
All of the flak is the company sending him out without proper training. The company got away pretty much free.
25
zzyulMay 1, 2026
-6
When conservatives attack anything there are always a group of liberals that rush to defend whatever they are attacking. Doesn’t matter what it is, there will always be some whataboutism or gaslighting or flat out ignorance used to ignore or forgive anything negative about whatever conservatives are attacking.
We used to be able to agree that some things are bad, no matter which side pointed it out. Now we determine if something is bad solely based on the side pointing it out.
-6
RiajnorMay 1, 2026
+14
There has been a definite increase in people more concerned about the messenger than the message. It’s not unique to todays politics but i feel that modern technology has made it more apparent
14
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+2
[removed]
2
AussieJeffProbstMay 2, 2026
+2
Are the liberals in the room with us right now?
2
[deleted]May 1, 2026
-5
[removed]
-5
RiajnorMay 1, 2026
+5
I don’t understand your point?
5
dahms911May 1, 2026
+5
This is not a case where there’s a scary evil person who’s clearly wrong and bad.
It’s case of negligence and an accident.
By everything that’s been said about him no punishment could be much worse than the punishment he’ll inflict on himself for the rest of his life for what’s essentially a mistake.
Unless you believe he purposefully tried to hit that bus, yeah there’s room for sympathy for a person who didn’t mean for this to happen.
5
ArrasorMay 1, 2026
-5
You don't "accidentally" run through a flashing yellow light at a stop sign at 60mph. It's a choice.
-5
dahms911May 1, 2026
+5
I think you may need to think a little harder if you can’t see any scenario where someone could accidentally run a stop sign.
In court he’d stated he was focused on a tarp coming off of the trailer behind him, ergo distracted and not paying attention in front of him.
But yeah I’m sure he absolutely meant to hit that bus, if it makes you feel better to be able to categorize people as solely good or bad.
5
RiajnorMay 1, 2026
-1
The law is supposed to protect us from these scenarios. The facts should define the outcomes in the legal system. The man signed a contract when he came into Canada, agreeing to abide by the laws of the country. He broke the laws and was duly sentenced. Legally he should now be deported.
-1
dahms911May 1, 2026
+2
He/his lawyers filed an appeal. He was given a stay of deportation while the appeal is reviewed and is likely to be deported anyway.
No decision has been made.
Would you not agree that it’s important to oversee and progress through the existing legal framework rather than rushing things or disregarding it?
Hey really quickly though “the law is supposed to protect us from these scenarios”, so the company owner who put him on that road as an incredibly green driver and got given a 5000$ fine should be held more liable than he was right?
Him being extremely green is the reason we’re having this conversation in the first place, what can be expected if drivers like that are being put on the roads.
If anyone actually gave a shit about preventing things like this they’d be after Transport Canada to change their rules and legislation rather than arguing he needs a longer sentence, harsher punishments or a quicker deportation.
2
ayeamayeMay 2, 2026
+2
Correct me if I'm wrong but that same intersection had a mass casulty collision previously.
This accident could have been prevented by having a 4 way stop sign intersection. What is the likelyhood of that intersection having a 4 way stop now? Anyone know? I would wager that it does have a 4 way stop now.
The question should be asked. WTF wasn't it a 4 way stop after the first bad accident?
2
Late_Tonight_9148May 4, 2026
+2
> This accident could have been prevented by having a 4 way stop sign intersection.
He blew through the stop sign. What makes you think he wouldn't have blown through it if it was a 4 way stop?
2
[deleted]May 1, 2026
[deleted]
0
Previous-Height4237May 1, 2026
+1
He murdered 16 people.
8 years is basically a slap on the wrist.
1
SquareSecondMay 1, 2026
+32
You do not know what the word murder means. I'm glad you're not a judge.
32
Club0utrageousMay 3, 2026
+2
Killing people is best done with a vehicle, get the lightest sentence possible, part of life in car centric countries.
2
RiajnorMay 1, 2026
-4
Dude served 6 months for every kid he killed, ignoring the ones he permanently injured but sure lets call it “vengeance” 🤷♂️
-4
[deleted]May 2, 2026
-3
[deleted]
-3
Necessary-Dig-810May 3, 2026
Wow he was allowed to plead guilty to something other than killing people.. wow
0
Suitable_Amount2974May 1, 2026
-7
You can't base punishment solely off the random outcomes of mistakes.
What if he had done the exact same thing but narrowly missed the bus and nobody died. Would you still think he should get more than 8 years?
-7
secord92May 2, 2026
+8
Whether people die due to said mistake is a pretty f****** big mitigating factor yes lol
8
Suitable_Amount2974May 2, 2026
-2
Yes but intent and other things matter too, not just the random outcomes of mistakes.
Its just odd to me that people blow stop signs and fall asleep driving all the time and they get no punishment. But if it happens at the wrong time and you kill someone then people want you in jail.
-2
AussieJeffProbstMay 2, 2026
+3
It's odd to you that people who commit negligent homicide or manslaughter are jailed?
3
Winbot4t2May 1, 2026
+8
That’s Canada for you.
It might hurt his feelings, so we can’t deport him. Oh and did I mention he’s just discovered he’s gay? Even his wife and kids are surprised!
/s
8
TonyMontanasSonMay 1, 2026
+11
Yea we can’t deport him. His extended family might have a hard time getting into the country if we do.
11
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+5
[removed]
5
elisabethofaustriaMay 1, 2026
+1
What exactly do you think the term “anchor babies” refers to?
1
BigButtBeadsMay 1, 2026
-2
Immigration scammers and criminals exploiting our compassionate policies
-2
ScaryPillow6 days ago
If he was white you wouldn't say this.
0
maxdragonxiiiMay 1, 2026
-1
right? I thought others chased him out the country a long time ago.
-1
solomons-momMay 1, 2026
+299
>Sidhu was behind the wheel of the semi-truck that blew through an oversized stop sign with a flashing yellow light, right into the path of the Saskatchewan junior hockey team’s bus, on April 6, 2018. The collision killed 16 players and staff and injured 13 others.
>his lawyers say Sidhu is living with mental health issues that could worsen after he is deported. His wife, Tanvir Mann, fears he won't get the counselling he needs because mental illness can be stigmatized in India.
After killing 16 people for regarding a Canadian stop sign as optional, one would hope he has "mental health" issues for the rest of his life where ever he lives.
299
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+40
[removed]
40
Knyfe-WrenchMay 1, 2026
+23
The pillar isn't retribution, it's deterrence. Punishments are only valuable insofar as they improve society at large.
23
dahms911May 1, 2026
+25
The problem is people have decided the only pillar that matters is retribution.
They want lifelong sentences or death sentences and decisions to be made on emotion rather than logic.
25
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+41
[removed]
41
Darko33May 1, 2026
+29
>When a person kills 16 people through an intentional action that they 100% should have know better to not do as a professional driver, is it wrong to treat them as a mass murderer?
I can answer this. Yes. He wasn't intoxicated or on his phone or even falling asleep at the wheel. He was momentarily distracted by a tarp that had come loose on his truck. So no, that doesnt make him Charles Manson.
29
Acid__godMay 2, 2026
+7
So he did a poor job securing his load. Part of the job of a professional(CDL) driver. Being distracted is no excuse because he should have pulled over and immediately remedied the issue with the tarp. Yet he stared in his side view mirror so long he missed the intersection. That’s bullshit.
7
mortavius2525May 2, 2026
+6
>So he did a poor job securing his load.
Or someone else did.
>Being distracted is no excuse
No one here is saying that it's an excuse. It's an explanation. No one in this thread is saying that he shouldn't face the consequences of his actions.
6
TheSnatchboxMay 1, 2026
-2
Yeah, Manson never actually killed anyone. This guy did.
-2
dahms911May 1, 2026
+14
A good example of an emotional argument.
14
dahms911May 1, 2026
+25
Yes is it wrong. Intent is the biggest part in deciding punishment and he did not have intent to kill anyone, a mass murderer does.
You’re going on a lot about him being a professional driver when he had barely any experience doing so and really shouldn’t have been on the road due to his inexperience. I believe he had about two weeks of training on the truck he was in. Of course the person who put him there gets a slap on the wrist and nothing more for his much more egregious negligence.
Does a year per life taken help anyone? Sure doesn’t bring those kids back to their parents. Just further institutionalizes an already remorseful individual.
Look to the US if you want to see if harsher punishments deter recidivism (spoiler, they don’t). Not that this is a crime where recidivism is even really a factor.
25
mortavius2525May 2, 2026
+2
>When a person kills 16 people through an intentional action that they 100% should have know better to not do as a professional driver
Where is your source that he saw the stop sign and intentionally chose to blow through it?
2
MacAttacknChzMay 3, 2026
+1
It wasn't intentional. Personally, I think he should still be in prison or deported. But words matter.
1
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+5
[removed]
5
TheNobleHereticMay 1, 2026
+10
If he’s really sorry for what he did he shouldn’t fight being deported. He should accept it as the consequences of his actions
10
the_sunflowerMay 1, 2026
+15
The article says “some” have forgiven him. I’m not arguing either side but you shouldn’t misrepresent this fact. Other parents say he should’ve been deported a long time ago.
15
Smart_Resist615May 1, 2026
+5
Sadly we've moved on to an era of performative cruelty.
5
FloraoftheRiftMay 1, 2026
+4
People are cruel and apathetic when issues don't affect them, these sorts of opinions shouldn't surprise you. This is typical behavior, far as I'm concerned.
I'm sure the guy will live with regret the rest of their life but that won't stop people for wishing violence and suffering. I hope he gets the help he needs, regardless of circumstance.
4
AtmacrushMay 1, 2026
-1
I mean, what's he going to do? Say not guilty when there's overwhelming evidence against him? Heck, even D4VD is trying to plea guilty so he doesn't get the death sentence for murdering a little girl he had a relationship with.
-1
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+7
[removed]
7
AtmacrushMay 1, 2026
+1
He killed 16 ppl and injured 13 and here you are saying he plead guilty like a good person. There are witnesses against him so pleading not guilty makes him look evil and lack of care for life.
1
SudoDarkKnightMay 1, 2026
+5
At the end of the day this was an accident.
Comparing a murderer to this guy is dumb. Not to mention the reason for pleading guilty is also completely different.
5
[deleted]May 1, 2026
[removed]
0
[deleted]May 1, 2026
-8
[removed]
-8
mysillyhighaccountMay 1, 2026
+2
Hmm Muzzo a rich drunk driver who never repented or even tried to look remorseful in the public (I’m from Kleinburg doxx me all you want).
Or an overworked guy who immediately accepted all fault and blame.
Somehow I think the 2 situations are pretty different. But after they both did their time, wishing cruelty on either of them is not going to do anything to bring back the dead.
2
dahms911May 1, 2026
+1
Would that make you feel better? Is that a proper penance for this crime, something that’ll fix the parents that lost children?
1
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
-57
Damn, I’d hate for you to make a bad and stupid decision and have to regret it for the rest of your life, having millions of people think you’re worthless, and getting 0 help to process it and move on.
-57
RiajnorMay 1, 2026
+23
I think he would have had more sympathy if he accepted his punishment and deportation instead of trying to caste himself as some sort of victim. Dude committed a crime that resulted in sixteen deaths and life long consequences for others, it’s not like he had a minor fender bender that scratched the paint on someones car
23
elisabethofaustriaMay 1, 2026
-2
But he did accept his punishment. He pled guilty to all charges (instead of asking for a plea deal), apologized to the victims, and spent three years in prison, before applying for parole as is his legal right.
As for the matter of his deportation, he wants to stay with his wife and two children, one of whom has a rare lung disorder and whose health could be endangered by the poor air quality in India. I think that’s understandable. Or do you think he should abandon his wife and kids without even trying to stay?
Also — applying for deferral is a legal right. I don’t think it’s any different from exercising your right to a public defender or your right not to self-incriminate. I believe all people should have access to their legal rights regardless of the crime. If you have a problem with the court granting the deferral, that seems like an issue to take up with the court.
Edit: I also want to add that this was a mistake. He was not under the influence or on his cell phone; he was briefly distracted by a tarp coming loose. It could happen to anyone; I definitely see far more reckless drivers on the road every day.
I’m not saying that he should not face any consequences. But I am saying that it was a mistake, and if you would made this mistake, wouldn’t you experience depression and mental health issues? (I’m assuming that’s what you mean by “trying to cast himself as some sort of victim”)
I thought that this statement by one of the victims’ family members was really thoughtful:
Haugan doesn't think Sidhu should be deported, either, because it won't bring her husband or the other victims back and will only hurt Sidhu's family.
"I forgive him," she said. "When he closes his eyes, I'm sure he sees horrific things and I just would hope that there's some way that he can forgive himself and know that he's allowed to be happy, too."
-2
HousingThrowAway1092May 1, 2026
+44
Therapy exists in India. It’s a bogus claim that is being advanced in bad faith.
44
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
-33
When did they claim that therapy doesn’t exist in India? They said there’s a giant stigmatism against therapy in India, which is true in a lot of parts of the world, just especially in India. But just because they have therapists in India doesn’t mean it’s accessible to those with no income or a means to support themselves, like the conditions one would find themselves after being deported. It’s expensive because it’s a specialized service that not many ppl in India use. Also, the society looks down on people who go to therapy, so he’d be shunned by more people in his community putting him in a worse place with zero support. To give an example of the stigmatism, it ranges from being shunned to being kicked out of your parent’s house because you want to go to therapy for depression.
Not saying he doesn’t deserve to be shamed for his stupidity that killed 16 people. But he needs to learn how to live with it and make amends so it never happens again. I’d like to believe some people can be saved and shown their errors (obviously there are ppl who cannot, but those ppl are usually sociopaths/psychopaths/sycophants)
-33
HousingThrowAway1092May 1, 2026
+36
Not remotely a valid consideration for determining whether he should be returned to India.
If you do not have PR and are not a citizen, you have no inherent right to live in Canada. A temporary visa is a privilege. If you commit crimes or are a risk to the safety of others, you are a net negative to the country that offered you an opportunity and should be sent home.
India has therapy. Dude can get therapy in India. There is nothing even remotely close to a valid refugee claim here. “I would have a better quality of life if I was allowed to stay in Canada” cannot be a valid consideration or else 99% of the worlds population all of a sudden is entitled to stay here.
36
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
+6
According to Canadian law, if immigrants, even those on work visas, commits a crime in Canada, they serve their time in Canadian jail and then are deported if deemed unable to be rehabilitated.
https://criminalnotebook.ca/index.php/Immigration_Consequences_from_a_Conviction
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/inadmissibility/overcome-criminal-convictions.html
6
pauljaworskiMay 1, 2026
+13
Sounds like he should be deported without a chance for appeal because he was convicted of a serious crime and served more than 6 months for it. It also sounds like he would have to be at least 5 years off of probation before he could apply to be considered rehabilitated
13
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
+5
He still has time on his sentence, so he has not fully served it (ends March 22, 2027) and his hearing on whether he can stay based on humanitarian grounds is after he was scheduled to be deported. If his request is denied, which it likely will be, and his sentence ends (even while on parole), then he should be deported (this is practically the only comment where I post my opinion on the matter, everything else was factual based)
And it’s not up to the general public to determine if he is considered rehabilitated, or how many years after their sentence they are considered rehabilitated. That’s something the courts decide. If they deem him too dangerous for the community, not able to be rehabilitated, etc, then so be it.
But I can’t tell you how many times I see people run red lights to make a u-turn, and narrowly miss hitting people (and I have seen one where the person hit a motorcyclist and they died; don’t think he should be deported, hung, or forced to work 16 hour labor shifts like another commenter stated). He was also just dumb enough to try it in a big rig. Serve the sentence and rehabilitate, or face the consequences.
5
pauljaworskiMay 1, 2026
+6
Yeah the 5 years was because in your link, it said you have to be 5 years passed the end of your sentence for it to even be considered after a serious crime.
It sounds to me like this whole humanitarian thing is a last ditch effort because the law is pretty cut and dry that he should be deported
6
codyzon2May 1, 2026
+3
But he's not in jail though? So by your own logic you should agree that he should be deported.
3
coolest35May 1, 2026
+10
Mental health is stigmatized everywhere, this isn't a lone country that has it. Infact, the country he is wanting to stay in also has stigma.
It's a better call saul argument at best.
10
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
-10
The country that his family wants him to stay in would provide him that support while in prison. India would provide no such service and he wouldn’t have the means to get it and would’ve vilified more than in Canada. That’s their point right there.
And yes, most countries have a stigmatism against seeking support for mental health. But most countries wouldn’t disown someone for wanting therapy and blame it on bad spirits haunting and cursing someone, making them an untouchable in Hindi society. Context is key brother, and empathy is King.
https://www.centerformentalhealth.in/mental-health-stigma-in-the-indian-context-why-it-matters/
-10
coolest35May 1, 2026
+16
Again, what his family want doesn't automatically provide merit to his stay. Should Canada start providing mental health therapy for anyone that shows up at their doorstep claiming stigma in their own country as a basis for asylum? What? The claim he can't get therapy in his home country is false. He's going to a country that actually has medical tourism for godsakes.
You mention his community vilifying him, do you think Canadians won't? Dudes a mass murderer. He's going to be socially rejected everywhere. Giving him the ability to stay in their country *because* he screwed up seems stupid at best.
Also, going to point to the better call saul argument here.
16
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
+1
1)Notice how I never statement my opinion on the matter? Because it’s not up to me. He still has time on his sentence and he has a hearing to plead his case to stay. By law, he should have his hearing, and he needs to finish his sentence while on parole. Then, if they deny his request, and he finishes his sentence on parole, deport him. That’s what the court basically said
2) he is not a murder, they charged him with dangerously operating a motorized vehicle that caused fatal injuries. He did not intentionally decide to kill 16 people, but his intentional decision, that was dumb and wrong, accidentally killed 16 people. He didn’t go on a mass murder spree like a terrorist.
Lastly, my opinion on the matter, it should go one of two ways: he should be denied the humanitarian grounds, finish the sentence, and deported, or accepted on humanitarian grounds, strip his license to drive away and deny him access to Canadas free healthcare. But do you know who that decision isn’t up to? Me or the general public. It’s up to the court system of Canada, and they made it clear that he should stay at least until his hearing.
1
alwayssunnyinskyrim3 days ago
+1
Why let him stay but deny access to healthcare? Who does that help? If he’s legally allowed to stay and live and work and pay taxes here, he should have healthcare. I would support deporting him; letting him stay here but not access health care means he’s more likely to become even more a burden on a strained system. Worst of both worlds.
1
IllustriousPhone98May 1, 2026
+8
He murdered 16 people.
8
RedditAdminSucks23May 1, 2026
+7
Incorrect. He was charged with dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death. Murder is defined as intentional killing with malice aforethought.
IE man was dumb and stupid, thinking he could make a maneuver with enough time, not realizing he did not have the time, space, or legal right to make that turn. He didn’t say “f*** that bus load of athletes, I like their competitors more, so I’m going to kill them”. If NA deported every person who made stupid decisions that directly ended up directly costing people their lives, our jails would be empty and we’d have no politicians left (/s)
7
alwayssunnyinskyrim3 days ago
+1
I mean… as far as bad decisions go, that’s a pretty big one. Killing 16 people, most of them teenagers, isn’t something you *should* just be able to “move on” from
1
expomacMay 2, 2026
+20
Canada is so lax its nuts
20
Karmawhore6996May 1, 2026
+77
This guy is fighting to stay in Canada for his kid and child’s health. There are 16 families who don’t have such a privilege. I don’t care what country you’re from, get em out.
77
tooshprightMay 1, 2026
+24
Just deport him already, this is ridiculous.
24
Saltynut99May 1, 2026
+37
He needs to be deported. Why the f*** are we keeping someone who killed so many people. As for his “distress”, good. I hope he feels the weight of what he’s done for the rest of his pathetic life. He obviously isn’t that sorry or he would leave on his own. The country doesn’t want him here, our justice system is a f****** joke.
37
iam_tunedINMay 1, 2026
+71
Improve driver training standards. Create better drivers, prevent tragedies like this.
71
rusticnachoMay 1, 2026
+16
https://www.cbc.ca/news/marketplace/bribes-trucking-industry-hidden-camera-1.7348425
We implemented them after this accident but as per the above article there are lots of people skirting the rules.
16
Disgustipated_SaturnMay 1, 2026
+63
Yes, but trucker turnover is crazy high because the companies hiring them use them up and toss them aside. If you want good, reliable truckers then the companies hiring them need the role to be lucrative enough to stay and let that training and expertise build into lasting careers.
63
LR0989May 1, 2026
+4
So less (but better trained) truckers with the same demand for truckers, companies have to be more competitive on wages instead of throwing people in the driver seat for minimum wage, therefore the role is more lucrative? I don't seen an issue there
4
hyper_espaceMay 1, 2026
+90
No amount of training will prevent negligence. The guy was grossly negligent. When you're driving you focus on driving and nothing else, especially a big truck. This isn't about "training" at all.
90
The_Rampant_GoatMay 1, 2026
+74
Not that it excuses him, but this is largely about training, even the victims families have called for better driver training. Doesn't make sense to blame one guy with 2 weeks of training, this is obviously a systemic issue.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/humboldt-broncos-bus-crash-licensing-class1-semi-trailer-truck-drivers-1.6197636
74
organik_productionsMay 1, 2026
+50
2 weeks?! That definitely isn't enough.
50
Dust601May 1, 2026
+15
That’s insane. In the U.S. I went to a cdl school for about 3 weeks to get my cdl, but then when I got hired by my first company I had to drive with a trainer for like 2 months before I was solo.
There are so many different scenarios, and situations you run into while truck driving that would have absolutely no chance of covering in only 2 weeks.
15
tonic613May 1, 2026
+31
You need training to know not to ignore a stop sign?
31
PhantomNomadMay 1, 2026
+8
Wasn't he trying to argue that there where trees or something so he couldn't see it? I'm not saying it's okay, but even in the city there are a lot of signs being blocked by trees and you really have to pay attention (again something we should all be doing anyway).
8
BurzyGuerreroMay 1, 2026
-14
you've never made a mistake on the road?
-14
ActivatingInfinityMay 1, 2026
+26
I can't believe I have to say this, but not everyone runs stop signs.
26
TrickstirMay 1, 2026
+11
Most people are obviously not making a habit of it intentionally, but it only takes being distracted, exhausted, and/or otherwise unintentionally missing a sign one time.
11
afz8May 1, 2026
+10
One time I turned into a one way road going opposite of traffic. No drugs, alcohol, phone or distraction. Just confused and trying to navigate a new city.
10
tonic613May 1, 2026
+2
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatoon/jaskirat-sidhu-pleads-guilty-humboldt-broncos-1.4969739
“Sidhu drove into the intersection at a speed of 86 to 96 km/h. This was despite a 1.2-metre-wide (four feet) stop sign with a red flashing light on top, as well as clearly marked highway signs warning of an intersection from approximately 400 metres, 300 metres, 200 metres and 100 metres away.”
He had MORE than enough warning a stop sign was upcoming.
2
TrickstirMay 1, 2026
+2
Nothing I said was defending this case specifically, I was just pushing back on the idea that only bad people run stop signs. It's usually normal people making unintentional errors.
2
Rampaging_DucksMay 3, 2026
+1
It seems to me that if you're a professional commercial truck driver being paid, there's a heightened responsibility for following all the rules of the road. 'Stop at stop signs' being one of the foremost among them. If his job caught him doing that, he'd be fired in a heartbeat, even if he didn't kill people as a result of his negligence. But even if he wasn't a truck driver, if this was just a guy, he'd still be responsible for the deaths of all those people.
1
TrickstirMay 3, 2026
-1
I don’t disagree, but none of that really has anything to do with the point I was making and I wasn’t making a statement about the person’s responsibility.
-1
SaskatchewonMay 1, 2026
+8
Most people don't, at least intentionally. But stop signs get missed hundreds of times a day in this country. This just happened to be an instance of it with horrific results.
The guy isn't evil. He didn't set out to flaunt road laws that day. He made a mistake that most drivers commit at least once in their lives.
8
[deleted]May 1, 2026
+2
[removed]
2
McJuggernaugh7May 1, 2026
+3
This is a systemic issue with truck drivers in particular though. Humboldt was obviously an extreme example. But we see truck drivers causing accidents and road closures on the daily and they are all very poorly trained. The issue is companies aren't penalized enough for repeat offenses and when they are they just create a new company and move the trucks over. A week of training isnt enough for a professional driver. Canada is notoriously great for people who dont give a f*** about the law though.
3
[deleted]May 1, 2026
-1
[removed]
-1
TrickstirMay 1, 2026
+2
Okay, and your claims are flat out racism, which is why your first comment was removed. Why is that less ridiculous?
2
LearingCenterAlumni6 days ago
+1
Need alot of training to know what a stop sign means./s
1
wrathofmogMay 1, 2026
+1
He blew a stop sign, killed 16 kids and you think that has something to do with driving standards? Toddlers know what a f****** stop sign means.
1
Nyx-ErebusMay 1, 2026
+46
Our justice system really just bends over backwards to protect murderers when they kill people using their cars. It’s pathetic.
46
ActivatingInfinityMay 2, 2026
+9
Jesus christ, did no one ever tell you that murder requires intent? He killed 16 people and didn't serve nearly enough time in prison, still not a murderer.
9
SquareSecondMay 1, 2026
-14
He did not murder anybody, stop misusing the word.
-14
Late_Tonight_9148May 4, 2026
+2
But he did kill 16 people.
2
SquareSecondMay 4, 2026
+1
Kill =/ murder
1
Late_Tonight_9148May 4, 2026
+1
And yet the end result is the same.
1
SquareSecondMay 4, 2026
+2
Yeah, but justice isn't based just on result but also intent. It's a pretty important distinction.
2
Nyx-ErebusMay 1, 2026
+1
Oh sorry, you’re right. It’s mass murder. If he had killed those people with any other means that’s what he would be called, but since he used a car suddenly it’s “no, cars aren’t actually dangerous! No drivers aren’t continuing to get worse and putting everyone at risk! Yes thousands of people every single year in this country are killed by cars but we can’t actually do anything about that!”
1
alwayssunnyinskyrim3 days ago
+1
Nothing you said changes the fact that getting in a car accident does not make it murder. He’s a killer, he’s a criminal, he should be deported, but he does not meet the legal bar to be a murderer. Words have meaning for a reason.
1
BaselineUnknownMay 2, 2026
+4
They can easy renounce when they move due to having parents both of Indian descent.
Quite the mental gymnastics you’re going through here to excuse keeping a murder.
Everyone has different values I guess.
4
Late_Tonight_9148May 4, 2026
+2
> Sidhu was granted full parole in 2023
I mean he only killed 16 people and injured 13.
He pled guilty in 2019, so apparently the price of 16 lives is 4 years in prison. So taking 1 life is worth 3 months of prison, nice.
2
BobBelcher2021May 1, 2026
+8
This news is a week old, there is no new development.
8
Nyx-ErebusMay 1, 2026
+1
[ Removed by Listnook ]
1
Maureen_JohmaMay 1, 2026
-13
He should go to jail in his country
-13
Necessary-Dig-810May 3, 2026
+2
Wow I just read that 8 years is the most stiffest penalty ever given out for a crime that is killed 16 people.. damn if you want to be a criminal go to Canada
2
ElspinMay 3, 2026
+1
The criminals have unfortunately already learned this, please send help
144 Comments