The mechanics here are pretty straightforward. Cuba produces about 40,000 barrels a day but needs over 90,000. Venezuela used to cover the gap, but after Maduro was removed in January those shipments stopped. Mexico's Pemex also suspended deliveries on January 9 under US pressure.
Both backup suppliers gone within weeks of each other. Cuba needs about 8 fuel tankers a month. In April, one showed up. On March 16 the entire island went dark for 29 hours.
228
techleopard1 day ago
+26
I feel like, if I were a rule of a country on the brink of energy collapse because I was entirely dependent on getting oil from outside through embargos... I would find other ways to get energy.
26
Entegy1 day ago
+75
Does Cuba have the materials, space and buying power to generate and store the alternative methods? Serious question.
75
xXNorthXx19 hr ago
+8
Working towards it but need $8-10 billion to buy enough supplies for it let alone enough electricians to wire it. Problem is everyone is broke and they don’t really have credit to pull loans as a nation….how would they pay it back issue.
Electric scooters with makeshift solar charging setups are working for a few but not many.
8
tagrephile1 day ago
+61
They’ve been embargoed for 60 years by the world’s most powerful nation, quite the take you have there.
Bootstraps, amirite?
61
Kdave2123 hr ago
+2
Why don’t they just trade with China? Serious question, wouldn’t China love to support them?
2
SiezeTheMeans_18 hr ago
+3
They would, but they'd have to go through panama (US ally) to do it - or go around Africa (expensive) just to meet US warships around the island. The embargo is very effective for this reason.
Edit: I forgot that the Suez exists. Point stands though.
3
Final-Lengthiness-1920 hr ago
+9
Uh, what makes you think the US would tolerate other methods of Cuba getting energy? We would ban those too. The whole point of Trump deciding to stop oil deliveries is to cause turmoil, then revolution in Cuba. Or just weaken them enough so he can send in our military and "save" the people from suffering. Cuba regime not innocent but most of the material suffering is the express goal of the US to destabilize the Cuban regime because "Communism"
9
newzinoapp13 hr ago
+2
They've tried. Cuba signed solar deals with China in 2024 and had plans for 2 GW of renewable capacity. But you can't build solar panels during rolling blackouts with no foreign currency reserves. The grid itself needs around $2 billion in investment and nobody's lending while US sanctions block most international financing. It's a chicken-and-egg problem.
2
[deleted]1 day ago
+1273
[deleted]
1273
CT_Phipps-Author1 day ago
+1532
Because Obama normalized relations with them.
1532
AJDx141 day ago
+486
And also Rubio wants to do a regime change in Cuba.
486
memberzs1 day ago
+275
Yeah he wants the fascist party his parents were part of back in power.
275
evocativename1 day ago
+118
Surprisingly enough, that isn't actually it.
See, his family fled Cuba **while Batista was still in charge**.
He is blaming Castro for the government Castro overthrew.
Because Marco Rubio is a lying little shit.
118
WetCoastCyph1 day ago
+25
Genuine question - to what end? Or what alleged end?
25
evocativename1 day ago
+40
Political power and influence, mostly.
Anti-Castro sentiment is popular in the Cuban exile community, which is a major force in Florida politics.
40
serious_sarcasm1 day ago
+17
Rubio wants to be governor of Cuba, so when Thiel, Musk and Bezo balkanize America he has a piece of pie.
17
inconspiciousdude1 day ago
+188
Does that mean Trump is going to rebuild Libya?
188
SwissChzMcGeez1 day ago
+70
Why? Does it need a hotel?
70
WhenTheLightHits301 day ago
+7
Nah but I heard the man knows his ballrooms
7
SwissChzMcGeez1 day ago
+24
The man knows his way around a pageant changing room that's for sure.
24
FlyBulky1061 day ago
+3
If he’s complaining about his excessive ballroom, then he should talk to his tailor about raising the inseam up on his pants.
3
kingkongsdingdong4201 day ago
+45
No. Plz no more ideas
45
UnitSmall22001 day ago
+41
The US had it out with Cuba since the revolution
41
OPA731 day ago
+33
Unfortunately so many people have no idea what you are talking about.
33
Aviri1 day ago
+22
No, most people know the political choices that have been made over the years, we’re wondering what’s the benefit of continuing like this.
22
glaba31411 day ago
+10
Most people absolutely have no idea of Cuba's history. You're frankly deluding yourself if you think they do. The average person has no idea who Batista is or why there was a revolution.
The American public's complete political ignorance is a big part of how the ruling class manages to do all this evil shit without anyone batting an eye, and it's deliberate. That's why they defund education
10
trollsong1 day ago
+6
Jingoism basically
6
mcchicken_deathgrip1 day ago
+171
We are trying to break their government so we can open their markets for US companies.
Obviously this strategy has been a failure, as it's gone on for 60 years with no impact other than making life miserable for every day Cubans. But it's basically turned into a political football as so president wants be the one to take the political heat for admitting we failed or looking friendly to so-called communist governments.
However Cuba does now appear to be at a breaking point. Largely due to the energy crisis from the US taking over Venezuela's oil production and exports and now the larger oil crisis.
171
cosmicaith1 day ago
+35
I thought it was those Cubans who were kicked out and now living n Florida who want to return to their homeland and claim back all the business's and properties that were taken off them during the revolution. Isn't little Marco the guiding light on this?
35
Useful_Respect33391 day ago
+21
Castro seized US owned Assets.
The island was owned by US corporations and the Mafia.
21
iggyfenton1 day ago
+12
I’m pretty sure they will get nothing as it’s divided up by the billionaires and Trump’s family.
12
LystAP1 day ago
+3
>I thought it was those Cubans who were kicked out and now living n Florida who want to return to their homeland and claim back all the business's and properties that were taken off them during the revolution.
Everything else aside, yes this is the voting base that's help keep Florida red for decades. A good number of them actually left Cuba after the Revolution, but blaming Castro for everything wrong with their lives is a easy thing to do. They do exist and are loud for their size. Would they get what they want? Unlikely. But generations upon generations have built their political perspectives off this 'dream.'
3
trollsong1 day ago
+16
HAHAH they will own nothing and cheer for it.
16
AndroidUser371 day ago
+2
Why is this some sort of "gotcha"? I have relatives who had their land taken away from them when they fled Communist Romania in the 80s. They're finally getting some compensation for that now, four decades later. It's not an unreasonable thing to hope for.
2
Btherock781 day ago
+12
I mean, Obama normalized relations and took that PR hit more than a decade ago. Mango Mussolini just decided he wanted to do it all over again for no justifiable reason
12
Tricky_Search_51811 day ago
+105
Magaland likes to starve people and say “see, they don’t function properly, they need us”
105
Significant-Owl-29801 day ago
+48
All while wearing comically oversized crosses around their neck and waving their bibles. 🙄
They love to say they are Christian but hate to act like followers of Jesus.
Jesus would be very angry with MAGA
48
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+19
Jesus would be terribly disappointed with most sects of Christianity.
19
jacksbox1 day ago
+19
Jesus would get crucified on social media today if he tried to speak out against Americans
19
Useful_Respect33391 day ago
+8
Trump is trying to force their hand or initiate a regime collapse.
He wants American corporations to own Cuba.
8
dxrey651 day ago
+23
We've been doing it at some level or other since 1960. It's working as expected - trapping a whole country in miserable grinding poverty. The idea is that the people would rise up and over-throw the government. The reality is that the government would massacre the people if they tried.
Not that Trump is justified, but it's not a new problem, and it's one stupid and cruel policy that both sides have been on board with for a long time. One side just enjoys it more.
23
SG_wormsblink1 day ago
+35
The whole blockade / sanction an economy so that the people rise up strategy has been shown to be mostly useless.
North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Myanmar, Russia, etc. The elites can ignore the sanctions and get whatever they want while the average people become even poorer and have even less power.
Sanctions are mainly an economic weapon to cripple an economy so that it can’t threaten you, it’s a very poor tool of regime change.
35
TheNatural140631 day ago
+26
Most revolutions (such as French, American, Russian, etc) have been started by educated middle class or upper middle class who feel as if the system isn't working for them and decide to use their education and resources to mobilize people against the government. French revolution had alot of alienated middle class and upper class professionals driving it. Many of the American Revolutionaries leading the effort were wealthier people who didn't want to pay taxes to the British and wanted more wealth for themselves (why they didn't allow those without property to vote when the country was set up for example). Jefferson, Washington, Adams, etc. All upper class with education. Russian Revolution had Lenin, Trotsky and multiple others come from privileged upper middle class backgrounds and have education. Cuban Revolution. Well Castro and Che had education and came from privileged upper middle class backgrounds.
Poor people hardly ever successfully rise up on their own and start a revolution.
Cuba doesn't have a wealthy enough middle class or upper class willing to overthrow it sooo
26
reasonably_plausible1 day ago
+7
>We've been doing it at some level or other since 1960.
An embargo (we just choose not to trade with a country) is very different than a blockade (we forcefully stop anyone from trading with a country).
7
[deleted]1 day ago
+46
[removed]
46
OK_x861 day ago
+30
A few things: the oil refineries were seized when the American controlled refineries at the behest of the State Department refused to refine Russian crude which Cuba had a right to import.
This pissed off the Americansl government who in turn slashed Cuban imports of sugar into the US. Cuba responded by seizing the plantations.
Then followed the initial embargo by Eisenhower. This specifically only covered trade between the US and Cuba in retaliation for the seizure of assets. Cuba was still free to trade with other countries, including the USSR. And they had loopholes in place specifically for humanitarian reasons.
It wasn't until the Kennedy administration that the embargo expanded significantly. And that was more in retaliation for the failed Bay of Pigs invasion and as a broader attempt to contain Russia/fight the cold war. They also retained some exceptions for humanitarian reasons.
Interestingly the Americans had imposed an arm's embargo on the Batista government which Castro overthrew because of its abysmal human rights records and regular repression of political dissent and opposition.
They just didn't like that Cuba might make deals with the USSR. This is frankly more about American hegemony than it is about stolen property.
30
WreckNTexan481 day ago
+21
So the US Military is a token gang for the elite Americans?
21
RVAteach1 day ago
+11
🌎🧑🚀🔫🧑🚀
11
ASZapata1 day ago
+34
You’re such a hack Cuba offered to pay the US back before they ever established ties with the Soviet Union. They offered, and paid out, the same deal to every other nation that owned land in Cuba.
The US refused the deal, embargoed Cuba, and then spent the next 50 years trying to assassinate its leader, stage coups, choke off its economy, and malign the nation at every opportunity. Who got ripped off again?
34
[deleted]1 day ago
+8
[removed]
8
ASZapata1 day ago
+21
You can look at the terms of each proposed deal. They were more than fair.
And mind you, all foreign-owned land in Cuba was taken through violence. Guess colonial violence is okay but not revolutionary violence. Hey, what about that American Revolution against the British… how did that one go again?
21
Codspear1 day ago
+2
>colonial violence
Cuba is just as much a settler colony as the US.
2
[deleted]1 day ago
[removed]
0
ChaoticGoodRaven1 day ago
+8
All that British infrastructure and contracts that businesses had set up, we paid back some private debt, but by no means every cent; how dare the US not pay back Britain every cent. Just like we paid back the indigenous people in America for every cent of land value taken from them. And I’m sure the people/companies that wrote the contracts in Cuba secured the resources and land fairly and without any unjust means, paying back every cent to everyone that they exploited in the process.
8
journeymanreddit1 day ago
+5
Cuba failed to pull of their "El Juche" plan.
5
Outrageous-Tell12181 day ago
+26
Many of the Cuban exiles are white or lighter skin. Most of the Cubans in Cuba are black or darker skin.
26
jackrabbit3231 day ago
+50
Not mentioned enough, the land owning system in pre-revolution Cuba was virtual slavery.
50
RetroHiztory1 day ago
+8
Because in the 50s they overthrew an American backed dictator.
8
sergiocamposnt1 day ago
+6
This is the correct answer.
The US is still pissed off that a Latin country did not become submissive to them during the Cold War.
6
Dhiox1 day ago
+3
Because we're assholes.
3
LucidNonsense2111 day ago
+1
You destroy the economy, then you buy it. Sadly. I bet in 20-30 years they’re a new American market.
1
necrotica1 day ago
+1
> Why are we blockading them?
Going to guess the sheep will belt out "51st State!!!"
1
Xyrus20001 day ago
+807
This administration isn't happy unless it's causing some sort of humanitarian crisis somewhere on the planet.
807
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+142
Now that is an absolute fact. Donnie’s regime is insane and loves chaos.
142
weelluuuu1 day ago
+8
1% = Thanos.
8
B-Jeovane1 day ago
+24
The US has been bullying Cuba for over half a century so this isn't new. Main difference is they no longer have the support of Venezuela.
24
Memitim1 day ago
+7
It's been too many days since conservatives had a good hit of human suffering, so the Republicans need to feed the evil.
7
privacyplease271 day ago
+3
It's only a matter of time before they start a humanitarian crisis at home too.
3
CT_Phipps-Author1 day ago
+1168
Trump's blockade is another meaningless display of cruelty designed to destroy everything Obama did.
1168
sleeptightburner1 day ago
+357
He [let Russia](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/30/world/americas/russian-oil-tanker-cuba.html) through though.
357
santz0071 day ago
+120
Is anyone surprised that he will do anything to help Russia
120
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+40
Wonder why Trump lets Putin do whatever he wants for the last ten years? Just asking for a friend.
40
Nicol2221 day ago
+20
Because if we ever had the guts to correctly overthrow him and the rest of maga he’s gotta run somewhere.
On top of Putin probably has some sort of leverage on him
On top of shitty birds of a feather be shitty
20
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+6
It’s pretty sure that Putin honeypotted him. How could that nimrod resist?
There are a lot of horrifying thoughts after this if you think about it. So DONT.
6
IamTheEndOfReddit23 hr ago
+5
He had to have been the easiest kompromat target they ever had
5
BeBearAwareOK1 day ago
+2
Vlad wore a suit and asked nicely.
Plus he holds all the cards.
2
arthurno11 day ago
+2
Yeah, once, so Putin has something to show at home.
2
ike71771 day ago
+66
Everything ANY US President did!
66
FlyingSceptile1 day ago
+16
And that includes earlier Trump (reference Canada and the USMCA)
16
livy-aurelia1 day ago
+10
the blockade, while being slightly curtailed, was still very much in effect under obama.
10
Im_better_than__u1 day ago
+340
I'm sure his base is sleeping better at night knowing that the pesky "cuba" thing is finally getting handled.
340
spiritualskywalker1 day ago
+129
What exactly did Cuba do to us? I must have missed something. Why are we starving them into submission?
129
Romeo_Glacier1 day ago
+374
Fidel Castro’s Revolution led to Cuba kicking out all of the US businesses and those aligned with them back in 60s. This led to the very rich leaving at first. Then the middle class ‘Varaderos’ leaving. Cuba was backed by the USSR at the time so the US stormed off fuming. Since then the US has had a hard on to reassert their control. This is a super boiled down explanation.
374
MonkeyCube1 day ago
+197
A lot of the Cubans who left are now in Florida and make up a large voting block. Marco Rubio's parents came from Cuba, though slightly before the revolution, I believe.
197
0Hakuna_Matata01 day ago
+100
Ted Cruz’ father is also from Cuba and was an evangelical preacher.
100
OPA731 day ago
+31
Damm Canadian immigrants.
31
trollsong1 day ago
+13
Was it his father or grandfather that was tortured by Batista yet he blames Fidel?
13
bonheurboy691 day ago
+50
Cuba’s not sending their best…
50
FOTORABIA231 day ago
+10
Scarface enters the chat.
10
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+4
Scarface was about the fact that Cuba sent their murderers and h******* criminals to the USA, and it caused chaos. Fidel called it flushing the toilet.
Those Cubans raped snd killed a lot of people.
Everyone collectively forgets Fidel was NOT a great Socialist revolutionary. He was a thug and he was down for the games.
4
blackfocal1 day ago
+5
Trump continuously talks about Mexico is not sending their best. Dementia patients have a habit of referring back to previous time frames. Is there a chance that Trump doesn’t know the difference between Cuba and Mexico?
5
FOTORABIA231 day ago
+4
I know. I lived in Miami briefly in the late 80s.
4
Ozone22018 hr ago
+2
yeah they fled the dictator before Castro, Batista. Similar in terms of oppression, very different ideologies.
Rubio has said that his parents fled Castro, but that's simply not true they fled 3 years before he took power
2
Some_Number_85161 day ago
+44
Mostly right, but an important distinction is that the USSR did not back the original revolution.
The revolution was actually independent, starting with Castro and a small band of revolutionaries evading capture, operating a guerilla insurgency after returning from exile. Castro was made famous because of his talent for showmanship and fiery rhetoric. As his army of revolutionaries was very small, stories of their efforts spread via radio over the country, leading to swelling of popular support against the oppressive Batista regime.
Once in power, Castro naively believed that the U.S. would still have trade relations with communist Cuba, but the U.S. chose to institute a hard-line blockade stance. Nikita Khrushev being the shrewd operator that he was, saw this opportunity and reached out to pick up trade with Cuba, and as a result, ultimately led to the Cuban Missile Crisis because the U.S. did not want the USSR having an ally so close to our borders.
This "failure" by JFK, and the general sentiment that we let the evil commies gain a foothold so close to the U.S. was used by warhawks against JFK to say that he was a weak. As a result, he and then LBJ felt compelled to take a more hard-line stance on communist advances in Vietnam to show they were tough, as part of their efforts to win re-election in '64.
44
trollsong1 day ago
+13
\>This "failure" by JFK, and the general sentiment that we let the evil commies gain a foothold so close to the U.S. was used by warhawks against JFK to say that he was a weak.
You forgot the best part the goading got to JFK so much he almost started a Nuclear war with Russia.
13
templeofsyrinx11 day ago
+13
I think some of this is in the godfather part 2
13
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+5
Yes to all of that. But we all forget the nuclear escalation, and the hijackings and ransoms, and the fact that Cuba was a Soviet sandbox that Fidel was down for as long as he was alive.
5
cheesaremorgia1 day ago
+13
60 years ago some American businesses lost some money.
13
RampantJellyfish1 day ago
+17
They had tbe audacity to be a communist country within 1000 miles of the US
17
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+11
Dude, not defending them, but there was a lot of bad things they did too.
11
sergiocamposnt1 day ago
+9
Not even close to as bad as the things the US has been doing since the Cold War started.
9
HungryCurrency84811 day ago
+41
They had the nerve to stand up for themselves and nationalize foreign businesses. That privilege is only reserved for Westerners.
41
effectsHD1 day ago
+2
Since when has the US nationalized foreign businesses? And it’s not standing up for yourself when you allow tons of foreign investment and then go and steal all the proceeds… remember they just stole those refineries with zero compensation.
2
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+6
Remember when they let people hijack American planes and held the people and planes for ransom? That’s some good standing up for yourself right there. Real moral stuff.
6
HungryCurrency84811 day ago
+3
Womp womp, probably shouldn't have backed a corrupt dictator and then enforced an embargo when Castro sent his ass packing to begin with
3
DiscordantAlias23 hr ago
+2
With a response like that, it doesn’t seem like you care much about what is right at all
2
HungryCurrency848115 hr ago
+2
We might have different ideas of morality, because I don't think a foreign power backing a puppet dictator that supports their exploitative economic interests over a small country is right at all.
2
HixOff1 day ago
+14
they don't want to lick boots
14
Im_better_than__u1 day ago
+14
60 years ago the aligned themselves with the soviet union! /s
14
fluffy_flamingo1 day ago
+2
Assuming you’re asking about why this is all happening now, as opposed to the historic reasons, the Trump admin is reacting to the vulnerable position Cuba found itself in after Venezuela’s Madura was removed from power. There was no specific or recent action Cuba took that the Trump admin is responding to.
There’s long been an appetite for Cuban regime change within conservative American politics. In a best case scenario for the admin, the Cuban government will collapse and the admin will have a hand in a peaceful restructuring of a new government. More likely, the admin is hoping the Cuban government will break in some way, new leadership will temporarily take over, and they will then pursue relief in exchange for some version of democratic reform.
While the admin has not openly shared their internal discussions or short-term goals surrounding Cuba, Marco Rubio is most likely the key figure within the administration pushing for the current course of action.
2
5121151 day ago
+3
Taking a page out of Netanyahu’s book, I guess. Starve them and break them. If he could do that to Canada and Greenland he would.
3
Offduty_shill1 day ago
+8
isn't this Rubio's pet project basically?
8
ZonaDesertRat1 day ago
+154
JR and Eric are currently working on a crypto backed investment to sell Cuba some of Florida's $6 a gallon diesel for $50 a gallon. All is well in the swamp.
154
Tacomouse1 day ago
+52
Can’t wait to see my doge check! Any day now…
52
ZonaDesertRat1 day ago
+35
I comes with your Gold Trump Phone. No longer made in America, but made with "Americans in mind."
35
NOFORPAIN1 day ago
+7
All the parts are shipped to South Florida and constructed by those Cuban kids so it's "made in the USA"*. No seriously, this isnt sarcasm.
7
OPA731 day ago
+1
Yea, just like the red hats. All made in 🇨🇳
1
digiorno1 day ago
+53
Time honored tradition of the U.S. using its military to crush another country and then blame that country’s policies for their collapse.
53
MsZRowsdower1 day ago
+33
They are ramping up their solar power. I hope they become the first fossil free country
33
Soupeeee1 day ago
+10
Me too. As long as they can get the materials, Cuba has the chance and the incentive to have a world-leading, high-tech energy grid. If they can secure the resources, they will probably leave the US in the dust so that in 10-20 years time, we will be jealous of what they have.
It's astounding how fast renewable energy technology has progressed, and how fast US policy is sprinting away from it.
10
0Hakuna_Matata01 day ago
+51
The business interests, the industrialists, in the US decided that we can’t have countries near the US with communism or socialism having any amount of success so they got the politicians to put embargoes on these countries to block them from trading with the largest economy in the world. They got decades of refugees telling everyone that socialism ruined our country and that scam worked to perfection bc people still don’t see it
51
Low_Pickle_1121 day ago
+27
>bc people still don’t see it
Fun fact, before he was one of the lead authors of Project 2025, the co-founder of the Heritage Foundation was on the board of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, advocating for the scam you mention. His success speaks for itself.
When Americans finally realize how those things are intrinsically connected, then the country will have a chance to improve from it's present situation.
27
Recidivous1 day ago
+12
Do you have a specific name? I need to learn more about this.
12
Low_Pickle_1121 day ago
+8
His name was Edwin Feulner.
8
dlxnj1 day ago
+5
Was that the same “victims of communism” memorial in Canada that had to remove all the names from the monument because half of them were found to be Nazis/fascist collaborators?
5
this_dudeagain21 hr ago
+2
Success..... riiiiiiight
2
SpeshellED1 day ago
+90
Meddlesome Yankees doing what they do best. F****** up some little nation because that's what you do when you are exceptional.
90
Low_Pickle_1121 day ago
+30
A decade or so from now we'll be hearing all about how this was all Cuba's own fault. Just like how the US takes no responsibility for every other Latin American intervention it was involved in and instead blames the people for voting for the wrong thing, like fair wages for banana pickers.
30
UnitSmall22001 day ago
+14
A decade from now? That's always the position of the US, past, future and present.
14
Intelligent-Parsley71 day ago
+5
In Cuba’s case, there’s a hell of a lot of blame to be put on the Castros as well. Let’s not act like one side was not down for party tricks. They were backed by the Soviets who have always been down for the party tricks.
5
w33dw1zard4201 day ago
+36
It’s funny that I’m supposed to believe socialism “collapsed under its own weight”
What is the keystone of socialism? Nationalizing industry and natural resources.
What happened basically every time a country tried to nationalize resources? Say it with me: **the United States did everything they could to murder the leaders and install a friendly dictator so we could extract all of the profits** 😀👍
36
5121151 day ago
+51
F*** America. Leave the Cubans alone. Let them get aid and energy.
51
ZoomZoom_Driver1 day ago
+26
Trump rapes kids and murders citizens of other nations.
26
norkb1 day ago
+20
This is about total control of our hemisphere.
20
Arbdew1 day ago
+29
The USA has a President who isnt in total control of his bowels never mind his hemisphere. Or did ypu mean haemorrhoids?
29
__O_o_______1 day ago
+1
Ah yes, the Donroe doctrine. Absolute insanity.
1
AbbreviationsSea79121 day ago
+13
Entirely within the realm of the barbarian Dumbroe Doctrine, manifesting the cruel suffering on the Cuban people.
13
Captlard1 day ago
+7
The peace guy is really helping others again /s
7
KardelSharpeyes1 day ago
+2
What does Cuba have on us that we are still blockading them? Aren't they insignificant in the grand scheme of things? Guess its just spite at this point?
2
Pantheon_Of_Oak1 day ago
+1
It has been spite for a long, long time.
1
Alb_1 day ago
+2
This american feud with Cuba is insane and petty. We need to STOP Jesus christ.
2
SnooPineapples2801 day ago
+2
What is it that the US is trying to gain by doing this to Cuba?
2
TheBoosThree1 day ago
+6
How many Cubans have they murdered with this blockade? It can't be 0 at this point.
6
ramdom-ink20 hr ago
+4
This is so inhumane. There’s no logical or geopolitical reason for this - it affects hospitals (births, machinery, ICUs etc.), supply chains, refrigeration of food supplies, air conditioning heading into record summer heat, economics of tourism, irrigation, entire workforces, internet access, fishing \*(again, food supplies)\* and so much more. It’s cruel and needless at the whim of an administration of madness.
4
[deleted]1 day ago
+3
[deleted]
3
meechmeechmeecho1 day ago
+5
It’s part of a multi decade long military strategy centered around the Caribbean.
5
kofybean22 hr ago
+3
A communist government selling oil on the black for cash is the height of irony.
3
Full_metal_pants0771 day ago
+4
Should have kept those missiles.
4
shadedmagus1 day ago
+2
I'm not surprised by this. But I was happy to hear that they are building up their solar capacity super quick. Hopefully soon they'll at least have stable electricity again.
2
Rivthea1 day ago
+1
almost time for the horse and buggy embargo
1
Turdfurgsn1 day ago
+1
Ahhh so that’s another play with this here war — to take cuba as well
1
ChillingwitmyGnomies1 day ago
+1
What is Cuba doing to harm the US? Why are they considered the enemy?
1
RadoBlamik20 hr ago
+1
“Just stop oil!”
“Okay, we’ve stopped all oil to Cuba”
“Whoa…not like *that*”
1
fleebleganger13 hr ago
+1
Woohoo!
We’re number 1!
We’re number 1!
1
moutonbleu8 hr ago
+1
Imagine this environment for 11 million people. The people always suffer for the people in charge. It’s cruel.
156 Comments