Dan Stevens Joins 'Dexter: Resurrection' Season 2

Sheridan is on the way out. Maybe his exit will force them to reinvest in the Dexterverse?

Landman is the shit lol edit: who the f*** hates Landman?

I mean my theory is because he literally says in the narration of the original series that Doakes is the only one who senses something off about him not the first but only I honestly felt that he meant at that time meaning maybe someone knew something was off about him before so that would have been Sarah’s character considering she was a forensics expert

It’s a mistake - resurrection is top quality tv - Peter Dinklage, and many other awesome cameos

You're missing out. Seriously.

We likely won't know the truth for a long while. NDAs and all. Frankly, Original Sin could have kept the Dexter fanbase supplemented and growing while Resurrection was in the works for more. Space them out to different times of the year so they won't compete at the same time. It'll be interesting to see what the truth of the matter is down the line. But frankly, between the two shows, I am glad Resurrection is carrying on for now. But with this merger upcoming, I am worried on how long it will last. They are going to need profitable IPs, and Dexter is one of them right now.

Ah well I was unaware that it was so widely streamed so yeah it doesn't really make sense why it got cancelled. Agreed though, Resurrection is such a good watch (so far at least) that I hope it keeps going until they've told the story they want to.

I thought I remember the reasoning being that they didn’t want to confuse the audience with 2 Dexter shows running at the same time. I guess they figured it could cause confusion/problems down the line? But you’d think if Original Sin was making money they would’ve kept it going. Especially because it was already renewed.

I see Godzilla as him taking his licks to make something special again. The ol quid pro quo with the entertainment industry. Really liked You’re Next and the Guest so I’m hoping for a return to form!

Sure, but those were all thirty years ago. Standards for an action star have changed dramatically. Daniel Craig’s issue with the part after Quantum of Solace was how brutal the physicality he was required to have was into his forties. Even without that factored in, by the time the next Bond releases, Stevens will be older than the oldest Bond in their first film, which was Roger Moore at 46. And even back then, Moore was a puzzling choice because he was older than Connery and much older than George Lazenby, who had already inherited the role from Connery. If you look at the ages of all Bonds when they were cast, all were in their thirties with the exception of Moore and Brosnan, and Brosnan was forty exactly, not to mention he would have been Bond in his mid-thirties if Remington Steele wasn’t renewed and he was able to accept the role the first time it was offered. Amazon would be idiots to cast somebody who isn’t in their thirties to lead the franchise for a decade or more. Moore is the outlier in the franchise for being well above forty when taking on the part.

Who wants that tho today?

I'll watch anything with Kristin Ritter

Skipped New Blood and went to Resurrection. The opening sequence recaps it fairly well. Far from essential viewing, thankfully, since it seemed kinda dumb.

[deleted]

[deleted]