· 191 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 24, 2026 at 1:05 AM

David Wilcock, History Channel personality and alien researcher, dies at 53 after police respond to 'mental health crisis'

Posted by JoyousCacophony



🚩 Report this post

191 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
StuffonBookshelfs 2 days ago +1513
There isn’t anything nice to say about this. Sad situation all around.
1513
Jackbuddy78 1 day ago +1741
I will say that the History Channel has a lot to answer for during years of boosting conspiracy theories to the public from the mentally ill and con men. It has helped set the stage for a lot of bs.
1741
Defiant_Sonnet 1 day ago +604
History is interesting, why the hell do we need shit like these shows. 
604
allnamesbeentaken 1 day ago +421
Because the people who find history interesting are in shorter supply than the people who believe in conspiracies, and revenue is generated from viewership
421
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +233
The outright stupid part of this true statement is that history is filled with so many amazingly interesting things, including true conspiracies. * Remember the Mossad pager attack? Things like that have happened since before recorded history (relative to their current tech); we had germ warfare before scientists knew what germs were. * And things like whole pods of dolphins have symbiotic relationships with human fishing tribes. * And scientists doing bug f*** crazy stuff like the radioactive demon core (The core of the third bomb not used after Hiroshima and Nagasaki) kill a guy because he was essentially playing with it with a screwdriver. * and explorers mapped the arctic with clothing that paled in comparison to what you can get at goodwill. * so many cryptids are based in cultural traditions going back hundreds or thousands of years, and a surprisingly large amount of them are based on, or actually full one are, real animals. * edit as I think of them * that it turns out the sound of wind on a snowy mountain very likely caused psychosis in a bunch of Russian college students, and ultimately took their lives. * [there are peoples *today* living on the ocean that have basically, and actually, never set foot on dry land.](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/10/the-last-sea-nomads-stateless-bajau-face-up-to-a-future-on-land-a-photo-essay) * [a relative of an anaconda existed ~65 million years ago that was likely so big it couldn’t fit through a standard bedroom door.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanoboa) * before the first faux salamander (our terrestrial ancestor) set foot on dry land, there were 10 foot long scorpions and 30 foot long lobsters. And those are just the relatively well known examples. There are so many obscure events Channels like History and Discovery used to tell those stories.
233
zevonyumaxray 1 day ago +75
And back in the day, so did A&E and The Learning Channel (TLC).
75
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +11
Animal Channel
11
thumble1988 1 day ago +26
Animal Planet
26
Hopeful-Flounder-203 21 hr ago +1
Enshitification reigns supreme.
1
DerekB52 1 day ago +56
I read your comment and thought, "that's not what happened at the Demon Core", and it turns out there were TWO lethal incidents with the demon core. According to wikipedia, you were referring to the second one. The guy was doing an experiment where you hold 2 bowls basically around the core. You were supposed to use shims between the 2 metal "bowls" so they didn't seal around the core and cause a reaction. A darwin award w***** used a flathead screwdriver instead of the shims. He did this at least a dozen times before the incident that killed him. Enrico Fermi even warned the guy he'd be dead within a year doing that that way. He was right.
56
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +34
The fact that it was allowed to kill two scientists the same way roughly a year apart is the bonus crazy in that story. It’s like when you first heard that some captive orcas killed multiples of their handlers across many years.
34
ThaddeusWerner 1 day ago +12
10 foot lobster? Dada chum dada chig, that lobster is f\*\*king big!
12
bhayn01 1 day ago +4
posing their never ending questions….
4
nuclearpiltdown 1 day ago +9
What's this about ocean people?
9
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +14
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/10/the-last-sea-nomads-stateless-bajau-face-up-to-a-future-on-land-a-photo-essay
14
Particular_Wear_6960 1 day ago +9
Yaaaaawwwnnn... but did you hear about Kim Kardassian's new dress? I think she's a total drama queen but that dress omg
9
Shad0wF0x 1 day ago +3
Jeez that Titanoboa is terrifying. It's like something from a Resident Evil game.
3
TurMoiL911 1 day ago +3
If you played the last Indiana Jones game, a Titanoboa is the boss in the Siamaese temple.
3
PrestigeArrival 1 day ago +2
The Tim Minchin song Storm touches on that. The world is so amazing and bizarre and wonderful all on its own. Why do we need to make up fake bullshit?
2
SickBurnerBroski 1 day ago +1
it isn't that those stories are less interesting. they take more work, and therefore money, to make. crackpots will tell their 'theories' for free.
1
ThesisWarrior 1 day ago +13
My God. This is so true. Very sad. People are more interested in fantasy or improbabilities than the fascinating reality we all live in.
13
DjangoTheBlack 1 day ago +4
The problem is we still give a f*** about revenue, if we want to build cool shit we need hierarchies, and if you want hierarchies, there’s gonna be pain and suffering to justify them
4
tomrichards8464 1 day ago +1
Not necessarily even in shorter supply – just less likely to be unemployed and watching TV all day. The Rest is History makes crazy money, presumably a lot of it out of people listening on their commute. 
1
MaxPower91575 1 day ago +1
don't forget it's way easier and cheaper to just let nutjobs make up shit than actually have to research history.
1
PleaseBeChillOnline 1 day ago +1
I don’t think that’s true at all. It’s more that people are lazy. You could make compelling content for the average viewer about real history but it would require rigorous fact checking & high production values to keep their attention. That is slower & more expensive than just using history as a backdrop for your own bullshit lore. People will eat it up either way.
1
HonestyMcNasty 1 day ago +74
History is *really* interesting! I just learned that somebody had the job of throwing loaded rifles at piles of rocks to see if they'd misfire. This was in the early 1900s, mind you, well before OSHA or safety glass. I love finding dumb moments of humanity in history.
74
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +30
I’m a biologist that works with reptiles and amphibians. I’ve got paper in my office from the mid1900s (before ethics in animal studies) where scientists threw snakes off a three story scaffold on a football field to see how they fell. They were not flying snakes.
30
Bedbouncer 1 day ago +7
I don't even want to know if flying snakes are a real thing.
7
acarp25 1 day ago +18
“Flying snakes” are actually a thing but its a misnomer, they can only glide
18
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +12
Yup, like flying squirrels, sugar gliders, flying lizards, flying frogs, and flying fish. We just use that label all willy-nilly. Except I can’t think of any actually flying creature called “flying [name]”. Flying Fox comes close, but that’s not a *Fox*.
12
lilesj130 1 day ago +1
I got so irrationally mad as a little kid that "flying squirrels" wasn't accepted as an answer on a test question about what mammals can fly. In hindsight that probably was a sign of a few things, but we didn't talk about that stuff back in the olden days.
1
sweepme79 1 day ago +4
I'm fairly certain u/Bedbouncer said he don't even want to know if flying snakes are a real thing. Like, come on now!
4
acarp25 1 day ago +4
I told them but also reassured that they can’t actually fly so… a little give a little take? *shrug*
4
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +3
Decently glass half full at least. *life pro tip* don’t stand below a snake.
3
bootymix96 1 day ago +4
[“As god as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.”](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf3mgmEdfwg)
4
phyneas 1 day ago +4
> They were not flying snakes. Well, they were for a very short time.
4
amart591 1 day ago +3
Well don't leave us hanging, how did they fall?
3
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +16
*poorly* Edit: lol, imagine throwing a garden hose off a three story building, including the thump when it lands.
16
ishpatoon1982 1 day ago +1
I mean...isn't that Science though? Learning how stuff works? Not saying it's the correct way to go about the details of gravity and snakes...but *Science*, no? Like in 100 years from now people are going to have more answers than us and be like "Wtf were they doing that for!?"
1
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +9
It is *commensurate* with the standards of science at the time. Absolutely. And we’re certainly doing things that’ll look that way in 100 years. But that doesn’t stop you from being a little wide-eyed when you learn about either of the above two (rifles and snakes) today. At least we’re not going to look as bad to 100 year future us as bad as they’ll look at 50 years past us. *Progress!*
9
echochambermanager 1 day ago +1
> And we’re certainly doing things that’ll look that way in 100 years. We are doing that today with dogs even tho we have equivalents to do research without dogs.
1
Tibbaryllis2 1 day ago +1
Yeah, I’m not going to justify current standards in research other than to compare them to past standards. At least we’re not quite to the level of [Vladimir Demikhov](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Demikhov) making doggy chimera.
1
Defiant_Sonnet 1 day ago +11
Try lions led by donkeys podcast youll find a lot of moments Joe talks about.  
11
Sir_Encerwal 1 day ago +7
Man, H2 used to be such a bastion for the old specials and Modern Marvels reruns back when I had the expanded cable package. Then it got replace by Vice, which, while not terrible, did not hit the same.
7
poorperspective 1 day ago +9
Because real history is expensive and takes time. I watch a lot of history content, Great Courses Plus, several podcast, Ken Burns ect. All these creators have long cycles, because it takes a ton of research. That doesn’t work for network television. Time takes tons of money, that doesn’t work for networks. But what’s really c**** is giving some surface level information and then raising your eye brows and saying “Aliens?”.
9
GreatBandito 1 day ago +6
they were easy to produce and reuse the assets from other shows I'm assuming
6
einstyle 1 day ago +3
I mean, history is interesting but aliens are definitely more interesting. Especially if you’re kinda dumb. The audience for history shows is smaller than the audience for dumb conspiracy theories.
3
Terminated_Entropy 1 day ago +7
Money.
7
tanporpoise89 1 day ago +1
Probably a new network exec who had to “make their mark” like happened with “syfy” and basically every channel in the 40s where I grew up
1
valiantthorsintern 1 day ago +1
Because it’s not really about history, it’s about escapism, transcending everyday boring existence and the hope that someone is coming to save us because this can’t possibly be all there is to life.
1
pbghikes 19 hr ago +1
The Da Vinci Code was a massive hit and producers said "*This is what the people want!*"
1
Zerobeastly 1 day ago +32
My aunt truly believed the documentary of the "found footage" of the "mermaid" was completely real and she could not be told otherwise.
32
Hairy_Combination586 1 day ago +4
That was around the same time as the Mega Shark "documentary" with the mega shark staying motionless next to an oil rig pylon. Yeah, it would suffocate. And the shark circling above a submerged upside down boat for many MANY hours with people breathing in an air pocket. Jesus wept.
4
upstatedreaming3816 1 day ago +1
[That’s largely a myth.](https://www.britannica.com/story/do-sharks-really-die-if-they-stop-swimming) (
1
Hairy_Combination586 1 day ago +1
Eh, "Largely" is a big overstatement, unless you're talking about stopping "for a few minutes". The fake documentary had the sneaky mega shark lurking next to the pylon for quite a while. >**If you look at the nurse shark and the tiger shark, this belief is already proven false: these, and a few other shark species, can stop swimming whenever they want**. They breathe by way of buccal pumping, actively “inhaling” water by using cheek muscles to draw it into the mouth and over the gills. **This allows sharks to stop moving but continue breathing.** >But **some shark species don’t have the luxury of buccal pumping. For example, the great white shark, the whale shark, and the mako shark** don’t have buccal muscles at all. Instead, these sharks rely on obligate ram ventilation, a way of breathing that requires sharks to swim with their mouths open. The faster they swim, the more water is pushed through their gills. If they stop swimming, they stop receiving oxygen. **They move or die.** >**Other shark species, such as the reef shark**, breathe using a combination of buccal pumping and obligate ram ventilation. When swimming slowly, they can use buccal pumping to supplement the amount of oxygen received from ventilation. **And if they choose to stop moving for a few minutes, they won’t risk their life**, though they generally aren’t as adept at stillness as sharks that breathe by buccal pumping alone. >Of these three ways that sharks breathe, the **combination of buccal pumping and obligate ram ventilation is by far the most common**. Most kinds of sharks, then, won’t die if they stop swimming. Note - for a few minutes, for the combo buccal pumping and obligate ram.
1
shitty_owl_lamp 18 hr ago +1
Wait. If some sharks have to constantly swim to breathe, how do they sleep??
1
Lollipoop_Hacksaw 15 hr ago +2
That was an ACTUAL thing for a week, where people had to talk others down about the "mermaid documentary" played during Shark Week back in like 2012.
2
freedfg 1 day ago +44
They've basically been feeding his delusions for upwards of what? 15 years? He comes up to them and says he talked to aliens in the center of the earth and it all sound a lot like fanfic. And they went "yeah yeah, tell us more, and the aliens? Were they bigfoot?"
44
Neutron-Hyperscape32 1 day ago +4
You are making a pretty drastic assumption that these alien beliefs are why he killed himself. The likely answer for why this happened is his recent divorce and financial difficulties, not that he talked about aliens on the History channel...
4
Neutron-Hyperscape32 1 day ago +6
This guy didn't kill himself because he talked about aliens on the History channel. He had a recent divorce and was having financial difficulties... that is almost certainly going to be the reason for his suicide. Blindly jumping to blame the History channel is wild behavior.
6
Worsebetter 1 day ago +5
You mean the 13 part series about HITLER using alien technology wasn’t ACCURATE!
5
DerekB52 1 day ago +21
I remember seeing History Channel make this shift to Graham Hitchcock level weirdos(idk if they ever did him specifically, but it's always people like him) and thinking "man, this shit is like out of idiocracy", and then Trump became president.
21
fergult 1 day ago +3
The History Channelleaned into sensationalism for ratings. it’s frustrating to see how that kind of content can mislead people and contribute to harmful narratives
3
JeddyH 1 day ago +3
[Dinosaurs and the Civil War, only on the History Network.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ2HjSzva1A)
3
Kryptyx 1 day ago +5
Or they are on to something and are being silenced. Like the NASA reachers who all ended up dead recently. All in propulsion technology.
5
StuffonBookshelfs 1 day ago +5
You found a much nicer way to say what I was thinking. I appreciate that.
5
BrockSnilloc 1 day ago +2
Between Facebook and Ancient Aliens my mom has used both to help destroy her view of the world
2
AustinDood444 1 day ago +1
You said this perfectly!! I guess all that matters is ratings.
1
pushaper 1 day ago +1
The American pickers guy had a health crisis too recently. The history channel and their partners need to be looked into. Somehow I think bravo seems to find unhinged people that dont seem to hurt themselves. Deadliest Catch (discovery channel) has had a few incidents I think but the race to the bottom has not been good for anyone. The biggest issue fundamentally with history/learning/discovery channels is they have historically had one major competitor that generally does more reliable and better work than them... public television.
1
LowRough5156 23 hr ago +1
And I’m sure it’s no coincidence that’s why the current administration moved to cut funding for that. It’s wild what can be done in the name of spending efficiency to cut truly informative broadcasting
1
pushaper 22 hr ago +1
ratings being down is not a reason to cut public broadcasting. I dont like how the UK does it but PBS and public broadcasters should have money even at a loss to offer a higher standard. Prior to the internet these stations mattered because they were not out advertise because people talked about the cool show they saw.
1
VERY_MENTALLY_STABLE 1 day ago +1
oh come the hell on, you're trying to make a connection between History channel shows about bigfoot to the current political landscape...? do you even have a specific gripe outside of "a lot of bs"? nobody is watching ancient aliens & then turning around & assassinating technocrats, people are assassinating technocrats after just reading the news.
1
Lollipoop_Hacksaw 15 hr ago +1
110%. The Ancient Aliens thing was lame, and the people they had on there were total goober grifters, but no one cares to be a cynic about something tragic like this. Doesn't change the fact that whatever person or administration that pushed this trash TV onto The History Channel (and TLC while I am at it) can go f*** themselves severely.
1
Filmyboicrispy 1 day ago -8
Are they still conspiracies if congress is having hearings on it and admitting to UFOs and extraterrestrial life?
-8
VERY_MENTALLY_STABLE 1 day ago +2
most people are entirely unaware & not ready to accept that all that has / is happening
2
mechmuertos 2 days ago +446
He thought he was the incarnation of Edward Cayce, and was deep into Illuminati conspiracy. He wasn’t well.
446
SirCaptainReynolds 1 day ago +44
Edgar*
44
mechmuertos 1 day ago +11
Whoops!
11
FeetballFan 1 day ago +6
He also lost most of his livelihood after basically getting caught scamming people and committing fraud
6
mechmuertos 1 day ago +7
Yeah he smelled like grifter from the beginning.
7
Neutron-Hyperscape32 1 day ago +4
I still don't think those beliefs are the primary factor for why he did this when he also had a recent divorce and was known to have financial difficulties.. that is almost certainly going to be the primary reason for his suicide.
4
mechmuertos 1 day ago +2
True. Absolutely it was combination of many things.
2
yeet_n_pray 2 days ago +421
Sad on a human level, even if > his work was… out there. Maybe a reminder that “TV personality” doesn’t equal “okay.” Check in on your conspiracy‑loving relatives.
421
ElectricalDark8280 1 day ago +43
They spit and hiss at me when I check in on them.
43
Debaser1990 1 day ago +8
Well, that's because you're obviously friends with cobras, humans don't typically do that 😅
8
SomewhereNo8378 1 day ago +58
I wonder if TV personalities have higher rate of severe mental health issues, honestly
58
Shinydolphin 1 day ago +57
Probably. But conspiracy theorists definitely do, and he was definitely one of the craziest.
57
Throwaway19999990567 1 day ago +2
I worked at a hotel he would come stay at, it was a remote mountain hotel and he would come for a week or two every year to write. I’ve never seen the show, he was a very nice friendly guy. 
2
Ehrre 1 day ago +164
Holy shit I forgot this dude existed. 20 years ago I tried convincing my parents to let me go to a spiritual retreat thing he was holding in the US. I listened to Coast 2 Coast AM conspiracy shows every night back then and was totally convinced in this guy's story. I dont believe in any of that nonsense anymore but it's still sad to see someone struggle with mental health go out like that.
164
KingKliffsbury 1 day ago +55
Man I loved listening to coast to coast back in the 2000s. That was when conspiracies seemed fun, kooky, and kind of innocent. 
55
Ehrre 1 day ago +26
I feel you. I listened to their backlog and then actively listened live on air starting like 2003-2007 or 2008. Smoking a bowl and listening to truckers get themselves all worked up and scared recounting things they seen or having some guest with earth shattering "discoveries" was a trip
26
jopnk 1 day ago +11
Coast To Coast was great before George Noory took over. I still listen to old recordings of the Art Bell episodes on late night drives
11
KingKliffsbury 1 day ago +7
Art Bell had a healthy dose of skepticism of everything. Noory was way too credulous. 
7
Ronho 1 day ago +4
Bell was amazing. Noory is too cozy with right wing nutjobbery. Thats not conspiracy, thats straight up grift.
4
jopnk 1 day ago +2
Art also had a better voice and cadence to his speech
2
Internal_Wheel_89 1 day ago +3
same.  Lots of good memories of driving home after work in the wee hours of the morning.  Sometimes you got Art Bell and sometimes you got George Noory.   I liked all that kooky shit even though I never took it seriously, but it still kinda irritated me that George Noory was so credulous and let guests say the most far out shit without any pushback at all.  That's probably part of why I got into Skeptics Guide at the tail end of that decade. 
3
Induane 1 day ago +5
Yea, now scientists are vanishing/dying in somewhat sus circumstances, and the lead singer for Blink-182 is working in a legitimately official capacity on UFO disclosure. Everything is weird now, AI is getting creepier by the day and Peter Theil says regulating AI will hasten the antichrist, drones fight a lot of war operations, there are robot police patrols, literally everything Trump does, RFK is cutting racoon dicks off of roadkill, chainsawing off whale heads, and faking bear/bicycle accidents in central park, all the Epstein horror, multiple members of Congress stating unequivocally that there are aliens, and wtf is literally happening right now?
5
LowRough5156 23 hr ago +2
Tim “Daggumit” Burchett’s latest comments have to be among the craziest/funniest of them. That poor fool is working on a “self inflicted mortality” with the stuff he’s been saying
2
Crackt_Apple 1 day ago +42
What, if anything, made you break away from that kind of thinking?
42
Ehrre 1 day ago +141
I grew up, basically. I most heavily believed in spiritual and conspiracy stuff from ages like 13-17. I started questioning claims and investigating guests. By the time I was 19 I was tuning in for entertainment purposes only. I accepted that it was bullshit. Everyone had a book or a course or a retreat etc to sell. Stories stopped adding up and fell apart with any amount of scrutiny. Eventually I stopped believing in anything spiritual whatsoever- even the harmless sort of nice things I grew up with prior to the conspiracy side of things. Now I take supreme comfort in the idea that my being conscious and aware at all is an incredible random gift and that one day I will simply cease to exist altogether.
141
vektorog 18 hr ago +1
bro became an atheist because of some tv conspiracist😭
1
UnquestionabIe 1 day ago +3
I absolutely loved Coast 2 Coast AM, back in college found a stream (this was mid 2007, long before such things were common) that played archived episodes dating back to the early 90s nonstop. Had always been into paranormal stuff so it was an absolute blessing, spend many a weekend gaming for hours while listening to discussions on the wildest rang of topics. Despite basically a life long fascination with the topic managed to never particularly believe in it. Just love how big and weird the world is, like there is a hidden history happening just out of sight.
3
SoggyCroissant87 1 day ago +1
What convinced you to change your mind?
1
Ehrre 1 day ago +8
No one convinced me, I just changed my mind on my own. I replied to this same question more in depth to another user before you if you wanna know more
8
Low-Opening25 1 day ago
usually by growing out of children stories
0
TheRealProtozoid 1 day ago +37
I've known people like Wilcock my whole life. We don't talk enough about the intersection of mental health and spirituality/religion/conspiracy theories. I know it's generally considered polite to respect people's beliefs, but sometimes people's beliefs are a warning sign.
37
Underwater_Karma 1 day ago +7
I used to have a group of "club friends", with a girl who was batshit crazy. she talked about the spirits who lived in her house that she would interact with, the conversations she'd have with her dead mother and/or Jesus right in front of us. and these people would aggressively defend her as a "free spirit" or "very spiritual" any time anyone said "wtf?" when she eventually attempted suicide and was institutionalized by her family, all these same people said "I never knew anything was wrong" and I called bullshit right in a few faces. called all these people out on how they made excuses for her every expression of obvious mental illness because they thought it was cute. if your friends aren't even allowed to help, you've got no help at all.
7
GhostPriestess 13 hr ago +1
My uncle has schizophrenia and due to his ever-increasing beliefs in conspiracy theories, he’s now wandering around the US homeless and refusing to accept any sort of help. We knew he was getting into a psychotic episode because he started talking about “chem trails” and telling us not to walk under the electrical polls and stuff. He’s thinks the government is out to get him. I’ve recently given up on finding him bc he clearly does not want to be found. I still worry about him every day. I know one day I’m going to get the call, or worse, that I’ll never get the call because they won’t be able to (or care enough to) identify his body. He’s just a random crazy homeless guy to everyone else.
1
PleaseSirOneMoreTurn 1 day ago +103
Rest in Peace, be kind to one another, mental health is so important.
103
non_Beneficial-Wind 1 day ago +12
The psyche, so easy to snap.
12
Really-E-Lee 1 day ago +3
Especially when you're being targeted by military contractors.
3
SgtHulkasBigToeJam 2 days ago +78
It’s been a rough week for basic cable TV stars. Someone better check on the Flavor of Love girls.
78
itsthe_implication_ 1 day ago +94
One of those girls put a whole raw chicken in the microwave to cook it and none of the new information I've learned in the 20 years since has replaced that memory.
94
sphynxfur 1 day ago +40
Hottie my beloved
40
Maddie-Moo 1 day ago +35
The way they added a bicycle bell sound every time she blinked, that show should have won a Peabody.
35
vctrn-carajillo 1 day ago +8
Humanity peaked during that era. Everything went to shit after that
8
TooTameToToast 1 day ago +20
Ok, I don’t watch that show, so I really need to know the outcome of the chicken in the microwave situation.
20
edked 1 day ago +29
Even if you cooked it that way long enough to not make you sick, you're still going to want to puke from the rubbery, gelatinous texture.
29
itsthe_implication_ 1 day ago +23
I still remember Flava Flav's reaction: ["Y'all wasn't serious was you?"](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_vyvix1N7Q)
23
CeeArthur 1 day ago +9
That was great. The look the blonde girl gives her when shes preparing it
9
sudolicious 1 day ago +4
lmao, thanks for posting this, this is amazing. I downloaded the whole show now, episode 1 is even more bonkers from the get go. Like you can't tell me the people at 30 Rock didn't watch EVERY SINGLE MINUTE of this, there's just too much. Even the name, "Flavor of Love" - "Queen of Jordan"
4
SteelyFan3 1 day ago +7
Breaking: "Mayor of Flavor Town" Guy Fieri, drowns in "freak" Barbecue sauce incident.
7
Silicon_Knight 2 days ago +137
Please talk to a professional if you ever feel this way. Between this and Darrell Sheets please know people care about you and love you. I know there are reports of cyberbullying for Darrell Sheets as well. Just be kind people.
137
AttonJRand 1 day ago +27
I know this is supposed to be a positive sentiment, and maybe I'm just being too literal. But why do people *always* say, "please know people care about you and love you" when I was at rock bottom this was verifiably not true of me, and it always made me feel worse, as if my situation was uniquely hopeless. Not to mention it being really bitter to think about the people who did love me and were gone, or those I thought loved me but showed me very clearly they didn't. I guess its more supposed to be some vague general, we love the world and all the people in it type thing? Not literally that I have loved ones in my life personally?
27
VoraciousChallenge 1 day ago +5
It's people who mean well but have probably never been in that situation, so they're extrapolating from incomplete data. Yes, a lot of people have people who care, but a lot more really don't. Some people have people who are more acquaintances than friends. I jokingly refer to a group of people in my life as "rent-a-friends" because they're my only social outlet and I see them at weekly paid gaming events at a store. People who stop coming just kind of get forgotten. When I took a break from it myself, I only got one message from anyone in that group, unprompted, that wasn't a response to me reaching out. If I died, I know people would be sad for a bit, but they'd all move on quickly and soon I'd have never existed. There are also people who say these things not because they believe it, or even care if it's accurate. They just say it because they feel like they should, or want to think of themselves as someone who would be there when, in my experience, a lot of them wouldn't. 
5
RipperReeta 1 day ago +26
Reports? [This channel/podcast](https://www.youtube.com/@HiddenInPlainSightRadio) did 6-10 hours a week just ripping the guy to shreds. It was 95% of their content. Just unrelenting. Think what you want to think about the guys beliefs and path in life. But people like these hosts are scum.
26
Move20172017 1 day ago +7
That guy has videos ablut David not darrell
7
wrathmont 1 day ago +39
I followed him and people who ran in similar circles back in the 00’s. I never actually believed any of it but it was entertaining to hear their fantastical ideas about aliens and stuff. He always seemed like a nice guy. Him apologizing to the dispatcher and saying “sorry to put you through this” was particularly sad. RIP
39
Introverted_Extrovrt 1 day ago +9
… 2 days after he released a video asking people to get help if they fell prey to thoughts of self harm. Seems like a bit of projection, in hindsight.
9
Kryceks-Revenge 1 day ago +10
This show is kind of my guilty pleasure. He was someone I recognized as a regular fairly quickly. So so sad. Damn.
10
thrilling_me_softly 1 day ago +6
I feel like we will be going through a major mental health crisis the next few years. No one has mentally recovered from Covid, the current state of the world is jsut make it all so much worse.
6
blue_sidd 1 day ago +26
He was a grifter and conspiracy theorist. Which is sad enough on top of being extremely mentally unwell. It’s sad in that way.
26
frmr000 1 day ago -37
What is a “conspiracy theorist” exactly? Two years ago people who said there was a billionaire pedophile cabal of sadistic elites were labelled “conspiracy theorists”. Does thinking any conspiracy exists mean you’re a “conspiracy theorist”?
-37
RetPala 1 day ago +17
Like Peter Griffin's skin tone chart, there are "OK" and "Not OK" conspiracy theories.
17
frmr000 1 day ago -4
Like I said, two years ago, people talking about Epstein would have been ridiculed, and now? These things change over time as facts come to light, but of course my completely reasonable point is being mocked and ridiculed. I guess I shouldn’t expect anything more from the television sub though. Just keep watching your stories folks.
-4
MarkDue8315 1 day ago +3
The amount of downvotes you are getting is baffling. You haven't said anything out of left field. You are totally right and the proof of the downvotes just shows how many people still want to remain closed minded.
3
frmr000 1 day ago +1
F*** knows. Herd mentality, lack of an ability or willingness for critical thought. This is the television sub after all, probably not a bastion of the brightest minds.
1
SteamedHamSalad 1 day ago +2
That is demonstrably false. Epstein has been discussed in the main stream since that Miami Herald article came out in 2018.
2
frmr000 1 day ago +1
And?
1
frmr000 1 day ago +1
Just to be clear, you do realize the official narrative is that Epstein acted alone, committed suicide and that the DOJ sees no evidence or reason to go after anyone else, right? So unless you believe that narrative, you are a conspiracy theorist. Do you not see why there may be a problem with that? Just because Epstein has been discussed in the mainstream media since his original charges, does not mean any meaningful truth about the situation came out. Hell at this point, if you're NOT a conspiracy theorist on the Epstein files, you are either complicit with the cover up, or you're a complete and utter moron. Hence why I take issue with the term being used pejoratively. But seeings how this whole f****** sub seems to not see that, I dunno, maybe the general public really is more f****** clueless than I realized and everyone really does have a childish, black or white view of the world that all conspiracy theories are wrong, and there is just no room for nuanced critical thought.
1
SteamedHamSalad 1 day ago +1
Maybe we are using different definitions of what makes someone a conspiracy theorist. A big part of my definition is someone who believes many conspiracies without having much evidence to back them up. They are skeptical of the official narrative but not the theories they either come up with or hear from others. I don’t think you should completely trust the official narrative. You should always be open to alternatives. But you also shouldn’t assume the official narrative is wrong without evidence. Epstein is the perfect example: Is it reasonable to believe in 2026 that Epstein acted alone? No Was it reasonable to believe in 2018 that Epstein might have acted alone? Maybe. It would depend how much you knew about the story. Most people likely knew Maxwell was involved at this time Is it reasonable to believe that Epstein might have killed himself? Yes Is it reasonable to believe Epstein might have been murdered? Also yes Is it reasonable to believe that there MIGHT be an evil pedo cabal? Yes Is it reasonable to believe that there IS for sure an evil pedo cabal? Maybe. This depends a bit on what we think cabal means. Is it reasonable to believe that there is an evil pedo cabal that eats babies for their adrenocrome so that they live longer? No not at this point.
1
frmr000 1 day ago +1
But this is exactly why I asked the question. The very term is a problem because it has lost its meaning. My original reply (which was downvoted into oblivion for even asking the question) was asking the user what a conspiracy theorist is, because they said it was sad that Wilcock was a conspiracy theorist. I do not see that as remotely sad, it should have no emotional attachment whatsoever. So I was asking what their definition of the term was. The term has taken on a new life to just be synonymous with crazy person, and that's not helpful. The reason why this is relevant now is because there is literally a massive conspiracy unfolding in the US government right now, which by definition, if you believe, you are a conspiracy theorist. But you would have to be a total simpleton to believe the official narrative. So that's why I asked in the first place, because OP was using the term negatively, while if looked at from a different perspective, it would be a negative NOT to be conspiracy theorist with current global events. And as always, nobody knows what they don't know and at any given time, something that was once deemed crazy, could be proven true if new information comes to light.
1
kaizoku222 1 day ago +7
Katma farm bot account. Report/block please.
7
blue_sidd 1 day ago +4
Sunlight is ok. You can go out into it for a bit.
4
Schroevendraaier 1 day ago +3
Born in Rotterdam (New York), died in Nederland (Colorado). As a Dutch person, I had to read it twice. Strange coincidence.
3
Low-Opening25 1 day ago +3
he was a mental health crisis for long time before now
3
Coilspun 1 day ago +12
RIP you absolute grifting fraudster. F****** "History" Channel...
12
SpaghettiNCoffee 2 days ago +7
Just heard about this earlier. I always liked his contributions on AA. You never know what people are going through inside. Very sad. RIP
7
masterdizastah 1 day ago +3
I was into this guy in 2009ish I think. I thought his stuff about the pineal gland and a giant mechanical version that can bring consciousness through time and space was really cool but never believed it,
3
Icy_Alternative_3962 1 day ago +7
What's crazier is there is a yt channel dedicated to shitting on him. IHIP. They were even joking about him committing suicide the day or day before he did.
7
wild-thundering 1 day ago +2
Robert Phoenix talks about him a bit extensively on his 15minutes of flame show. I think it’s pretty tragic
2
doctor_sleep 1 day ago +1
That's the second History Channel personality to die by suicide this week.
1
iiSpook 1 day ago +4
If someone is injured you send an ambulance because it's a health issue. If someone has mental health issues you send the cops because?
4
Lfeaf-feafea-feaf 1 day ago +1
Because he has a gun?
1
iiSpook 1 day ago +1
Everyone in your god forsaken hell hole of a country has one, that's not an argument.
1
pdjudd 1 day ago +1
Well no not everyone does. But that is the answer. The standard response to someone threatening violence is to call the cops.
1
LaserWeldo92 1 day ago +4
Sounds about right for alien c***. So many conspiracy theorists just have mental issues or deep seated paranoia
4
lynivvinyl 1 day ago +7
Is everybody who has any interest in aliens and a platform going to die?
7
DraperPenPals 1 day ago +37
Well, everybody is going to die….so….
37
the__ghola__hayt 1 day ago +6
Speak for yourself, mortal.
6
darsynia 1 day ago +1
We'll really find out if it's 'any' interest if Miniminuteman bites it (hope not!), as a debunker
1
Trump-is-the-pedo 1 day ago +4
Almost like obsessing over something as inconsequential as the distant possibility of aliens on earth is a sign of mental illness. Big overlap with new agers in the hobby-to-mental breakdown tragedy pipeline.
4
HanSolo100 1 day ago +2
Really sad. I remember watching him so many times on ancient aliens. RIP.
2
Underwater_Karma 1 day ago +2
"alien researcher" is a hell of a way to spend your life. it's worth taking the lesson here that some of these people aren't just grifters and hoaxers, some of them are genuinely mentally ill and providing them a platform to perform is the opposite of what they need.
2
mr9025 1 day ago +1
Whaaaaaaaaaat???
1
Top-Translator3920 1 day ago +1
It's a sobering reminder that behind every wild theory is often a person struggling with real demons.
1
Frangipani_x 16 hr ago +1
Also, his biographer, Wynn Free, died 2 days before David. Same cause of death.
1
Acidhive 16 hr ago +1
I seriously don’t understand the comments here. He’s mentally ill because he thought thousands of years ago that the earth was visited by other beings of intelligence? And that there are people who believe in a parallel religion of negativity. What’s wrong with that? I think people here are mentally ill for not taking into consideration how warped of a planet we live on and the things people do for money and power. RIP.
1
QCfatNugZ 11 hr ago +1
Les moutons vont se complaire en parlant de théories du complot plutôt que d'ouvrir les yeux
1
Demerzel69 10 hr ago +1
It was aliens.
1
Affectionate_Try1469 1 day ago +1
Another victim of the suicide epidemic. I suppose we should assume another coincidence.
1
prison---mike 23 hr ago +1
Sometimes, it’s the ones you most expect
1
Somebody23 18 hr ago +1
This was suicide like Epstein.
1
Roofiesnductape24096 1 day ago +2
is this a nice way of saying the police killed him?
2
Underwater_Karma 1 day ago +4
> "Within minutes of deputies' arrival, he used the weapon on himself," local police reported. I can see not reading the article, but you didn't even read the headline.
4
Devilofchaos108070 1 day ago -1
Sure sounds like it
-1
Roofiesnductape24096 1 day ago +1
so sad it happens all too often. something similar happened to a gentleman in my town having a mental health crisis. nearly 2 months later not even a follow up.
1
SupermarketEmpty789 2 days ago -9
Dang. This dude was awesome on ancient aliens  He had his own show for a while that went for many seasons called "wisdom teachings" was pretty out there
-9
Kundrew1 1 day ago -5
I wonder who really got em. Could be the Mayans but I wouldnt count out the aliens.
-5
Calverish 1 day ago -3
Some ancient astronaut theorists believe it
-3
MatthewSWFL229 1 day ago -4
Did he realize he threw his life away researching aliens and figured he didn't have enough time to start over?
-4
Kind-Pea578 1 day ago
Not only are Aliens real, you have some of their DNA 👀 should be thankful.
0
IAmJustAVirus 1 day ago
HE KNEW TOO MUCH 
0
gin-rummy 1 day ago -3
Oh phew. I thought you meant Canadian rock and roll legend David Wilcox 😮‍💨. I USED TO THINK THAT COKE. CAME IN A BOTTLE OR CAN
-3
sanctaidd 1 day ago -24
Very much connected to all the other scientists “suiciding” lately. Up to 11 or 12 now. He did alot more than ufos.
-24
picknicksje85 1 day ago +28
Very much connected to his wife having left him. Dog dying. People pointing out his grifting lies with receipts. About to lose his nice house. Angry scammed Stavatti investor coming after him. That’s his fake aerospace company. Losing everything, being in debt, court cases and probably jail time looming. I think also decades of his own lies might have done something to him. Ascension deadlines and end of the world deadlines that never came true. Claiming he’s Edgar Cayce reincarnated. Ra speaks to him. Archangel Michael speaks to him suddenly. Go buy the Michael prophecy books people! Peddling any and every conspiracy out there. Reptilians. 20 and back. Q. Med beds. Anything he could ride and grift from. Millions he earned this way. Also used charity money for personal use. He was never any scientist or truth teller. You are as much a scientist or in the know as he was. During the last years he was bathing in his ow pee because Michael told him to. RIP. But we have to also look at the facts. Saying he won’t kill himself might have been a way to save face. So people wouldn’t think cowardly of him, but as a warrior of “truth”. I’m sure he did tell some truths. Some universal ones, and some he got right by accident. But we can’t forget all the rest. Scamming gullible, desperate people out of their money.
28
PM_CUTE_BUTTS_PLS 1 day ago +1
Nah, must've been the government for reasons we'll make up later /s
1
God_illa 1 day ago
Isn't this how Bill Cooper died?
0
MarkDue8315 1 day ago
All of you involved in this thread need to open your minds. Firstly, your focus on "shit shows" like ancient aliens... tells me more about how you have never read any of David's material or truly invested in what he had to say outside of that show. His body of work is incredibly interesting. This is an incredibly sad situation and very fishy. He is now 1 of 12 scientists that have "gone missing" or "died" within the last few months... Have some compassion. 2 days before this event he was repeatedly saying he loved his life during his stream and how grateful he was. He was excited for next week's episode as well... Don't be dense and accuse everyone of mental illness just for exploring out-of-the-ordinary theory and ideas. Without exploring the unknown you literally denounce science in itself - the very thing you all are claiming gospel in this comment section.. That is all. RIP David. You were a truly kind and brilliant man that was obviously misunderstood.
0
DJC_Kowalski 1 day ago
I'm not surprised the History channel was boosting people in mental health crises for their alien and conspiracy shows. I liked the good ol' days when they actually showed history on the History Channel.
0
saraaaabeeee 10 hr ago
I’m not sure if the people in the comments are being genuine or if it’s people pretending, but that man had said countless times he was not suicidal. He was adamant about that. Everyone on Listnook so quick to say it’s a mental health issue and just conspiracy theories. Are you living under a rock? Or do most of you skimp the surface of a topic so you can feel self important enough to make a comment you hope gets upvotes? Do you always read a news article and believe it at face value? God help us.
0
← Back to Board