· 187 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 6, 2026 at 2:19 PM

Decades of economic decline has 'broken' Britons, pushing one fifth of people into poverty and towards political Reform

Posted by Kagedeah


Britain has become a broken, poverty-riddled 'living nightmare'
www.abc.net.au
Britain has become a broken, poverty-riddled 'living nightmare'
London. It's the epicentre of Britain but without it the UK's GDP is equivalent to the poorest state in the US. And one fifth of the total population is living in poverty.

🚩 Report this post

187 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
Griffolion 4 days ago +534
What needs to be pointed out is that Brexit made this worse _but was not_ the beginning of it. The UK has been in a state of managed decline since 1956. The _only_ time in modern memory where it felt like the decline had ceased, and a new baseline had been formed, was during Tony Blair's Labour from 1997 to 2008. Then the financial crash happened, which wasn't Labour's fault despite what the British media _still says to this day_, and it all just went downhill from there politically. The Tories got in, and causes a triple-dip recession in the British economy due to their austerity policies, while all other economies recovered on the back of stimulus policies.
534
I-vonatinkle 4 days ago +105
I would go back to 1914, but 56 is a fairly good starting point
105
meisangry2 3 days ago +1
I would argue it was cause by the Anglo-American loan agreement. A huge loan to rebuild the uk after ww2 that left us incapable of managing the empire properly. Trying to hold on to too much left us with minimal reserves to invest and a lot of what was invested outside the ukeft along with those countries when they were granted independence.
1
I-vonatinkle 2 days ago +1
I'm pretty sure we defaulted on our loans to the Americans from the 1st world war in the 30s. I think this is why when we asked for help during the second, the yanks were so reluctant and charged us through the nose
1
meisangry2 2 days ago +1
Ah, see I didn’t know about that. I could see how that may change things.
1
invariantspeed 4 days ago +47
The UK has been extremely conservative (non-political meaning) when it comes to policymaking. That will always be a path for managed decline. The willingness to take risks, tear things down, invest in building big things, etc are all necessary. I haven’t seen that in British politics for as long as I have been watching, but I also have not seen it across most of Europe or in the US. The west has calcified.
47
Honest-Fortune2920 3 days ago +2
The culture seems utterly opposed to it. See: some of the utterly insane censorship and weapons laws. I don't want to throw buzzwords around but it really is the definition of a nanny state, and that sort of regulatory environment is utterly toxic to actually successfully conducting any kind of business.
2
Personal_Ad1143 4 days ago +73
In 2007 Brits were richer than North Americans
73
derkrieger 4 days ago +12
Eh, the currency was nominally higher but I wouldn't say they were on average wealthier than Americans or Canadians.
12
pppiddypants 4 days ago +13
> What needs to be pointed out is that Brexit made this worse but was not the beginning of it. Accelerationists need to recognize that right wing incompetence does not always result in more support for left wing parties…. A lot of the time, it results in support for more extreme right wing parties.
13
TheRealYilmaz 4 days ago +7
Kind of the problem with accelerationist theory tbh. Did things get better after getting worse? The theory works! Did things get even worser? Then we need to keep digging until things get better!
7
bbbbbbbbbblah 4 days ago +17
to add to this, the British economy has for decades been ridiculously lopsided towards London and the area around it. Traditional industries in the rest of the country were allowed to fail while their money was ploughed into London and its finance and services industries, which unsurprisingly now form a major backbone of our modern economy (though Londoners like to insist they did it all themselves). This isn't great for anyone, not even Londoners as their property prices have spiked to unaffordable levels. It's a great place to be if you have money or were fortunate enough to be able to live with parents I guess. Attempts at decentralising have not been well thought out as it has invariably just meant "move it to Manchester".
17
Logan_No_Fingers 4 days ago +7
Theres an element of competive advanage there tho' The number of industries the UK could materially compete in has shrunken dramatically, so to a degree it made sense to invest heavily in financial services & not in, say, car making, where no amount of investment would have keep UK based Vauxhall or Mini manufacturing competeive at scale Where the UK definately shit the bed was not deciding, given the north sea & oil/gas, the UK should be a market leader in oil services. It has a few companies, but if you contrast what the UK did v what the Norwegians did - specifically with Aker & Statoil (Equinor), the Norwegians made it government policy to force it through, the UK went "up to the market", sdo you have the Nowegian govt owning a big chunk of Aker, & private equity owning Harbour Energy in the UK. The Norwegians did exactly the same model with offshore wind. It feels like an obvious no brainer right? What can we invest in & becoming cutting edge exporting globally? Oil & gas servicing, off shore wind! - but the UK (at a govt level) just went "nope" while the Norwegians went "well, obviously!"
7
Ok-Store-9297 3 days ago +2
>The number of industries the UK could materially compete in has shrunken dramatically, so to a degree it made sense to invest heavily in financial services & not in, say, car making, where no amount of investment would have keep UK based Vauxhall or Mini manufacturing competeive at scale It only "makes sense' if you can continue to take China's export glut money and recycle it into actual productive endeavour (A big if as the world becomes more multipolar; a massive gamble effectively). If it just pushes up asset bubbles, the profits don't get recycled and redistributed throughout the wider system, and it doesn't facilitate the productive economy, then you end up where we are now - fecked, as the article says. It's the Emperor's New Clothes, and I hope people wake up to what happens to financialised economies before things get too severe.
2
Logan_No_Fingers 3 days ago +1
I think you are trying to reframe it to match your narrative, rather than actually addressing whaat I said. It made sense for the UK to be a finance hub as it ticked a lot of competive advantages globally - solid courts, stable reasonably dependable government not prone to big switches (til Brexit), a widely traded underlying currency, fluid capital markets, access to Europe, strong global ties (US, Commonwealth, Europe), excellent source of labour (Oxbridge, LSE etc), global finance language (English), a city expats actively wanted to live in - meaning off shore banks would happily base here, a "stradling" timezone (US/Europe/ME/Asia) etc. All core reasons the UK was competive in that space. And that decision has funded a LOT of taxes. And vehicle manufacturing was the opposite - no advantages and negative input in terms of taxes thanks to bailout You are right in that it hasn't funded enough taxes, as global loopholes have been used. But there you run the risk in a global market. London is attractive for FS, but you go full transparacy you lose out to Frankfurt, or Singapore, or Paris. You only have to look at the global banks setting up in Europe rather than London post Brexit. A globally transparent capital market would be great. As would a unicorn that shits rainbows.
1
Ok-Store-9297 3 days ago +1
>You are right in that it hasn't funded enough taxes, as global loopholes have been used. But there you run the risk in a global market. **London is attractive for FS, but you go full transparacy you lose out to Frankfurt, or Singapore, or Paris**. You only have to look at the global banks setting up in Europe rather than London post Brexit. This is the problem with neoliberalism in that it requires this circular, pessimistic logic. If you don't pull your pants down to the international capital, it will just go somewhere else! Keynes saw right through it, and that happened to coincide with a period where people felt more like they were part of a safer and more productive nation. What we have, ultimately, becomes this self perpetuating feedback system that broadly leads to widening polarity between haves and have-nots everywhere. The end result is the decimation of the middle class, which every crisis reliably brings us nearer to. I personally don't think it's a good idea, but I guess I must be a communist for thinking that our politics should revolve around creating a better society (also, not killing off the biosphere/food supply seems a sensible idea) rather than making a single metric of GDP go up in a wildly undistributive way. Edit: Neoliberalism is an abject policy failure, and it will become increasingly astonishing that anyone bothers to argue otherwise.
1
ceemeebonnie 4 days ago +10
The rot started when Margaret Thatcher got in. She was anti worker, anti union and sold off all the silverware to her friends. Just look at the mess of water privtisation where England has raw sewage running in their rivers because private water companies prefer to pay dvidends to shareholders. They used profit to pay dividends and not investing in maintenance and capacity. Thatchers stupid policies has also flowed to places like Australia where mass privitisation continues while the public pays twice as much for their previous assets that they owned. Its the scam of the century privatising profits and socialising the losses.
10
Old_news123456 3 days ago +4
One really important thing that happened after 2008 crash was that companies bought up rental  property and family housing.  Now there's a huge issue trying to find a flat to rent.  It's shocking when you look into how much rental stock was bought up super c**** after the crash. This had a profound effect on affordability.  By 2026 you see the word Blackstone a lot and they are cornering the market worldwide.  Today UK healthcare professionals are seeing rickets return as children are malnourished. People freeze while the heat is turned off. They huddle in coats, hats, etc under blankets. You cannot turn on the heat. It's outrageous what they charge.  https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/18/return-of-victorian-era-diseases-to-the-uk-scabies-measles-rickets-scurvy https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/nov/09/uk-households-winter-heating-study
4
xX609s-hartXx 4 days ago +8
Didn't Blair start another major round of privatising public utilities which has only gotten worse over the last decades?
8
Griffolion 4 days ago +35
No he didn't start that at all, it was started under John Major. Blair did continue the privatisation, however, and that is one of the things I ding his premiership on.
35
SideburnSundays 4 days ago +2
Is *anywhere* other than China and the US not in a state of economic stagnation or decline?
2
Ok-Store-9297 3 days ago +1
It disturbs me that this has so many upvotes. Tony Blair's Labour is a big part of the reason everything is so bad now. That government deregulated the City, which massively contributed to the Global Financial Crisis ("wasn't Labour's fault" - What? You don't remember Mandelson saying he had no problem with people in the City getting absolutely filthy rich a la Gordon Gekko?) In fact, Blair and Mandelson enabled The City to grow into the monster that it is today, helping it to stoke a property bubble that has priced young people out of homeownership, tied up wealth into illiquid, stagnant assets (housing) and left areas outside of the capital to rot, with multiple, multiple negative downstream consequences. The Blair government also massively expanded the public-private ownership of PFI, which is part of the reason the state has much less money today, because it is still busy paying back the 20% or so returns that private equity demands in order to 'invest' into the country Yes, that Labour government spent more and had schemes like SureStart, but if you wonder why the industrial position of the country is so bad now, then the Nu-Labour government is a huge part of the reason. Our finance-led model also completely depends on upholding the International Rules Based Order. now very much under threat as the world becomes more multipolar. Let's all just pray that we don't have to literally realise that you can't eat spreadsheets one day. >The UK has been in a state of managed decline since 1956 This is debatable and would be fiercely contested by economists and historians alike. Britain was still a major industrial power into the 70s. What I think is less debatable, is that Neoliberalism is the economic model that is gradually sucking wealth out of the nation by enabling the sociopathic forces of international capital to play states off against each other in a race to the bottom, and sees a domination of the country by private, multinationals who spend a good deal of time and effort arranging their corporate structures so they can move profits outside of the country and often into tax havens. The Finance Curse by Shaxson, Trade Wars are Class Wars by Michael Pettis, Late Soviet Britain: Why Materialist Utopias Fail by Abby Innes are the books to read if you want to understand the headline of the linked article.
1
suddenlypenguins 4 days ago +88
Council just shut down the tiny unstaffed library attached to my kids school. To save £12k a year. I'm so fricking tired and done with this country.
88
Shinyandsmooth8 4 days ago +17
If it’s like my council, they’re utterly inept, and everyone working there are all friends and family
17
skrztek 4 days ago +5
Meanwhile the wage bill for Manchester City footballers is over 200 million pounds per year. Bread and circuses!
5
barnfodder 4 days ago +1691
The problem is that the "Reform" party is run by exactly the same parasites that have been driving the economy down the toilet for decades. But they hate the right minorities to maintain popularity.
1691
Available_Finger_513 4 days ago +472
The simpletons are easier than ever to control through social media. Guess it's back to the dark ages where the church was telling everyone exactly what to think...
472
Internet-Cryptid 4 days ago +293
I have a terrible sense that the world is reverting to something medieval. Spreading autocracy, might makes right politics, it's looking nothing like the future I hoped for in my youth.
293
Rwandrall4 4 days ago +144
The people who believe in democracy still do, there has never been more liberals than there are today. But all the different movements that opposed liberalism are uniting under the banner of stupid, thanks to social media driving them to their worst impulses and politicians capitalising on that.
144
CatProgrammer 4 days ago +41
This shit has been in the works since long before social media ever existed. 
41
Rwandrall4 4 days ago +58
not really. the utter stupid on display now, the complete nihilism, that's new. conservatives believed in something, at least. even the old school fascists did -believed in something truly abhorrently evil, but they believed in something. What we're seeing now, the utter slop, the endless memes, the utter empty void of entertainment at the heart of it, that's new.
58
putsch80 4 days ago +8
“Nihilists! F*** me. I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos.” -Walter Sobchak
8
DumbOfAsh 4 days ago +10
Pretty certain they’ve always wanted people like me dead actually lol
10
ArcticMarkuss 4 days ago +7
Furries?
7
DumbOfAsh 4 days ago +4
I have bigger problems than that what with not being cis and such xd
4
AlizarinCrimzen 4 days ago +2
Social media was gasoline for this advance though. So much easier to erode and supplant confidence in each other, institutions, reporting etc
2
Selvon 4 days ago +8
Yeah, you can very much see it in the US. The actual, genuine "conservatives" aren't in control of their own party anymore. It's been co-opted by religion, hate and sheer nonsensical levels of greed/capitalism. Almost nothing that has happened in the current term, or the previous 4 years of trump made actual sense for a "conservative" party. And that's what's happening in the UK too, one party is gathering up the stupid, the religious, the hating of others and going "oh we're totally the better option". A coalition of the worst.
8
Rwandrall4 4 days ago +11
it's not religion, the President is basically the antichrist, and they rejoice in breaking every single moral any religion has. They are amoral, areligious. They drape themselves in God, or country, or democracy when they feel like it, but they don't mean it. it's not capitalism, either. The markets are crushed, free trade is plummeting, the "free market" is being kneecapped. Capitalism is showing it has in the end very limited power. And it's not even hate, not really. They will pick and choose who to hate on a whim, based on what will further their purposes, then change to something else. The hate is just a tool to get people to bash on whoever they want to bash, but if Trump told them trans people are cool, they'd happily accept it and move on. This is what I mean, they are nihilistic and motivated only by a feeling of power and self-importance. They are happy to be poorer, to betray their religion, to love or hate at will, as long as the central tenet of feeling big and important is maintained. All they want is a steady supply of that feeling, and they don't really care about the world beyond that. It's pure consumerism.
11
Zwets 3 days ago +1
> All they want is a steady supply of that feeling, and they don't really care about the world beyond that. > It's pure consumerism. That is actually a pretty spot on way to describe it... Yet 'consumerism' also feels like too broad of a term for it. "Political-consumerism"... no. "Affirmation-consumerism" perhaps? Would be nice to encapsulate "buying that feeling" and "paying with destabilization/regression" in an obvious term.
1
Rwandrall4 3 days ago +2
thats a good question to ask, I would actually turn it around and say that ALL consumerism is about buying feelings. Whether your time and money is put into a Trump cult, or into an oversized beefed-up truck, either way you are buying a feeling of being big and important, about affirmation. The genius of the Trump cult is that it doesnt ask for money, not directly. Just your soul, bit by bit, meme by meme.
2
Griffolion 4 days ago +50
There's a reason why most of far future sci-fi stories are some manner of authoritarianism or feudalism. It seems to be our natural state. I'm beginning to think that things like democracy, liberalism, rules based order built on institutions, will come to be regarded as some blip on the radar after WW2 that "quickly" corrected within a century. The rich and the powerful simply are not okay with ceding their power & wealth for the sake of a better world. They'd rather be rulers over the ashes of a barren and dead world rather than equals in a paradise.
50
Breasan 4 days ago +27
I always thought thay authoritarianism and feudalism were in far future sci-fi stories because it's what we fear. In my opinion, sci-fi speaks to the fears of the public. That, and they make for fun stories where you can easily pick out who the bad guys are.
27
Etherealwarbear 4 days ago +6
It's like that question of "would you rather serve in heaven or rule in hell?", and all of humanitys elite would pick the latter.
6
ThereAndFapAgain2 4 days ago +1
I mean, ruling in hell does sound kinda badass though.
1
blitzkregiel 4 days ago +8
authoritarianism is not our natural state…it was simply the default state when we were developing as a species, and there’s a difference. the majority of people don’t want to be ruled with an iron fist and don’t want to labor their life away in squalor—the issue is that the people in power want that for everyone else and it’s a threat that keeps popping up every time wealth concentrates.
8
Funyon699 4 days ago +2
Well said and thought provoking. Also scary as hell.
2
Traditional_Worry307 4 days ago +3
Exactly. Because then they are not superior to any middle class person. There is nothing special about them. No separation
3
StanDaMan1 4 days ago +1
> The rich and the powerful simply are not okay with ceding their power & wealth for the sake of a better world. So how did we pull it off the first time?
1
Griffolion 4 days ago +12
Because we were so horrified and exhausted after WW2 that we collectively had a moment of clarity, and our leaders were willing to expend the political capital to make it happen.
12
trout_or_dare 4 days ago +1
Most of the big democratic revolutions in Western Europe happened in the late 19th century, after the first ones happened in the United States then Poland in the late 18th century. The main reason this happened was because the common people looked at the behavior of their supposed 'betters', noticed that they sucked, and demanded better.
1
SatansFriendlyCat 4 days ago +1
There was a culture with elements of ethics or at least morals, rules to live by, a set of standards. Now all of those have been eroded and eclipsed by money as the rulling ethos. Corporatism is in everything, including government - where it most especially does not belong - and a couple of generations have known nothing else. It's internalised, money must flow to the rich, and that's the only active moral in effect. Government is corporate, everything is run in a corporate style. Every cost must be cut, constantly, and for why? So that the wealthy may accumulate more. It's not even questioned any more, just accepted that that's the
1
Elavia_ 4 days ago +1
It's definitely common, but is it 'most'? I've consumed an unhealthy amount of sci-fi in my life and I feel like dystopias, while far from unpopular, have been the minority.
1
Wide-Equivalent6863 4 days ago +7
Techno feudalism maybe, look up dark enlightenment Scary stuff But we had a while where we were sorta progressing in a vaguely right direction, it could happen again - well I hope so anyways
7
HCAndroidson 4 days ago +13
Humanity has gone complete moron the last 20 years. Which coincides with the rise of smartphones and social media. Im not a scientist but its obvious that the "smart" phones are making people stupider. But im afraid the addiction is too strong. Only total collapse will force us to change.
13
Randall_Moore 4 days ago +7
Or plastic is the new lead and we haven't figured it out yet.
7
nafoty187 4 days ago +1
We are back in acoustic space.
1
xParesh 4 days ago +14
Whatever you think about the great unwashed being allowed to vote without an IQ test, that system is never going to change. You can attack social media or extreme party leaders all you like because people are not voting the way you would rather like them to. However the moment you start calling the electorate names and belittle their intelligence, they really dig their heels in. Why do you think people voted for Brexit? Why you think after the clown show that was Trump 1.0, people would not just vote in Trump 2.0 by not just winning a swing seat, but by giving him every single one of them on par with a super majority. Unless you revoke democracy and have a system of election that doesnt involve voters that you can openly call brain washed simpletons being able to vote, you are going to have to find a way to win them over to your way of thinking. I think you need to learn lessons of what the impact of name calling the electorate makes them do at the ballot box.
14
GourangaPlusPlus 4 days ago +13
>I think you need to learn lessons of what the impact of name calling the electorate makes them do at the ballot box. I don't think people voted brexit because one person who is not a politician voiced their own opinion on listnook
13
xParesh 4 days ago +7
It wasn't just Listnook though it? Every online and offline media savaged anyone who didnt follow their narrative and then even though most people didn't have a solid opinion had to choose between a vote to submit to all the forces trying to intimidate them or just say FU, I'm going to do the very opposite of what you want me to do. And they did. And they still do. And they always still will. These political lessons have been long learnt by all the major political parties globally because in the end it cost them everything.
7
youngBullOldBull 4 days ago +6
Yea savaged them because it was a generationally dumb thing to do lol What is up with this cope that we shouldn’t tell people they are being dumb because it might make them oppositional - dumb is dumb and boo hoo if your feelings get hurt
6
5pin05auru5 4 days ago +6
> Why do you think people voted for Brexit? The same reason why British teenagers demand to be allowed to do something, and then go and do it anyway.
6
Outrageous_Manner941 2 days ago +1
You don't convince your dog to take his pills by insulting it, you have to cover it in peanut butter.
1
excitablegibben 4 days ago +2
The church of the billionaire.
2
reveil 4 days ago +1
Honestly if people nowadays actually listened to the Church instead of politicians the world would be a much better place.
1
AtomicBollock 4 days ago -6
This attitude is exactly why Reform are popular. What did you think would be the consequences of years of labelling a large swathe of predominantly white, working class, underprivileged voters as ‘simpletons’ just because they realised the EU wasn’t doing anything for them, or because they dislike how rampant, uncontrolled immigration has transformed their towns?
-6
mujhe-sona-hai 4 days ago +10
I mean those are two different points. The EU was pretty useful to the UK as they were getting Polish plumbers instead of someone from the 3rd world who don’t respect British values. And as Brexit has shown the EU was pretty useful in keeping the British economy afloat, now without the single market Tesco prices are downright criminal.
10
AtomicBollock 4 days ago +1
My point wasn’t about the relative merits of the EU (I voted to remain BTW), but about the denigration of people as being stupid for airing what are a valid set of grievances.
1
ren_reddit 4 days ago +6
That's *NOT* a valid f****** excuse.. These people fucked up in some of life's choices and now they should be met with *respect and understanding* for pissing on people, not directly involved in those choices, as revenge?
6
AtomicBollock 4 days ago +1
‘They’ feel like they have been ‘pissed on’ for decades. I mean, take a look at the comments on this post. Whether you like it or not, a significant amount of people in this country feel that multiculturalism is a failed social experiment, that the EU benefitted big business and economic migrants at the expense of their own interests, and that social/political/cultural elites are actively trying to delegitimise their grievances, which they are.
1
ren_reddit 4 days ago +9
Bull.. The fools kept voting Tory against their own best economic interests, all while being spoonfed propaganda that its *really* the black man or the bad EU's fault... Now they will double down by voting Reform in a reaction to their loss.. My god, somebody needs to tell these folk's the truth.. And it for damn sure ain't gonna be the same jokers that got them in to this mess to begin with.
9
AnDie1983 4 days ago +53
You have to keep the poor hating each other. Else they find out how much the rich actually own. In Germany the two richest families own as much as the poorer half of the population for example. 
53
Kopie150 4 days ago +10
So same as here in Belgium. A lot of left leaning People voting right because immigration is a major point in the decision Who to vote for and the parties on the left dont want to represent them.
10
BadmiralHarryKim 4 days ago +42
There's a book called What's the Matter with Kansas? by Thomas Frank. One of the key points of the book is the Conservative movement in America has successfully convinced the White Working Class that government cannot materially help them so they vote for their cultural interests rather than their economic interests. It seems applicable for other countries too.
42
ThePlanck 4 days ago +8
Reform is the home of the worst of the Tories who have been in power for the last one and a half decades
8
ObstructiveAgreement 4 days ago +14
No one else is offering them anything. Look at the number of places in the UK that are derelict and have already fallen apart. And none of the major parties care, so someone offering something, anything, is appealing, particularly when they give them reasons for why this happened (which are, obviously, all lies). This is what Thatcherism leads to, be warned rest of the world.
14
MontasJinx 4 days ago +2
But surely if that rhetoric didn’t work anywhere, it will work in the UK!
2
Whit3Pudding 4 days ago +2
Works every time!
2
okram2k 4 days ago +3
a pretty common theme across the world tbh
3
[deleted] 4 days ago -1
[removed]
-1
barnfodder 4 days ago +7
Ironically, it's American style politics we're importing.
7
pmcall221 4 days ago +1
Exactly, how many Conservative politicians have moved to Reform? It's not a small number.
1
AlloAll0 4 days ago +1
They just need to change the name from time to time, the sheep will happily walk towards the wolves again.
1
[deleted] 4 days ago +655
[deleted]
655
D-Angle 4 days ago +156
Every year since 2008, the message has been the same: "There's not much money right now, so we're going to have to cut things back and ask you for more. But it's the only way to get us out of this slump." Rinse and repeat on an annual basis. 18 straight years of 'Jam Tomorrow', and they call it unreasonable to ask where's the bottom. I would never vote Reform but anyone with half a brain can see where their popularity is coming from, people haven't had anyone try to improve their quality of life for almost 2 decades and you'll listen to anyone when you're as desperate as that will make you.
156
metrize 4 days ago +11
i don’t know why they lie about that, i’m in japan and all they do is borrow and spend and it seems like it works fine for them
11
rufofuego 4 days ago +3
I'm in Japan too and it "works" now, but is like spending on a credit card, it works until you have to pay it back.
3
Prodigle 4 days ago +16
The point is that the economic benefit of the spending outweighs the debt you're creating. It doesn't matter if you borrow 100 million if you generate interest+2% a year from it. Get it right and it's a free economic boom, get it wrong and you pay for it with inflation. Austerity is just the same, but you always pay for it with inflation :(
16
EnvironmentalToe4055 4 days ago +1
Carry trade
1
Nomer77 4 days ago +63
The phrase "one of the richest countries in the world" does more and more work each passing year. The UK's share of global GDP shrinks every second of every day and if you rank by any per capita metrics rather than absolute GDP size it is a much less impressive picture. And if you adjust for PPP or look at things like disposable income... Suddenly the UK's peer group becomes Central Europe.
63
socialistrob 4 days ago +24
> And if you adjust for PPP Adjusted for PPP the UK ranks 30th in the world (roughly on par with the EU average). The UK is just above Czechia and Italy and just below South Korea and France. I'd still qualify the UK as a rich country globally but it's certainly not the standard bearer it once was.
24
Nomer77 4 days ago +7
Yeah the ranking/metric I sometimes see references is [Median Equivalized Household Disposable Income (PPP)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable_household_and_per_capita_income) which has the UK 21st (but for 2021).
7
Northerndust 4 days ago +19
If a rich country cant take care of its people. It is a political decision, not an economic.
19
splvtoon 4 days ago +3
the problem is that apparently, thats what a lot of people want, since they keep voting for it.
3
TiredOfDebates 4 days ago +1
The "rich" are frequently only rich due to unrealized and unrealizable gains. I would love to be able to make a visualization of the ridiculousness that is extreme wealth created by high finance.
1
Northerndust 4 days ago +1
Sure. And I believe that there should be a somewhat of a cap in that
1
Heizard 4 days ago +56
Lords and monarchs take it all, nothing has changed.
56
Rwandrall4 4 days ago +58
Quality of life in the UK is better than any time before, liberal democracy largely works, and it is those very oligarchs who want to convince you that they don't. Because if people think there will only ever be an elite in charge of everything, then the only right move is to just pick "your" elites to fight off "their" elites, which is what the alt right is.
58
s0cks_nz 4 days ago +12
How is that measured? I left the UK in 2006 when food banks didn't even exist. Been back a few times to visit and it just seems worse each time.
12
TheShruteFarmsCEO 4 days ago +3
Would love to hear where you’ve moved that you’ve seen an equivalent improvement over those same 20 years.
3
Lucky_Programmer9846 4 days ago +7
Going off his name it's New Zealand which is also in decline.
7
s0cks_nz 4 days ago +11
New Zealand. I've done quite well recently, but broadly it's pretty shitty here too for most people, especially now we have the fuel crisis.
11
TheShruteFarmsCEO 3 days ago +2
Exactly my point. Ask any “native” New Zealander whether quality of life has improved for most people over the last twenty years and you’ll get a similar response.
2
s0cks_nz 3 days ago +1
That's fine. But I wasn't saying anywhere else was any better.
1
Rwandrall4 4 days ago +2
Not everything is better for everyone in every indicator, true - food poverty for example is a huge problem but it is highly concentrated into particular areas. It is true that some areas of the UK, particularly up North, have gotten very poor and desperate. But meanwhile crime has gone down, teenage pregnancy has gone down, health outcomes have improved, racism and sexism and homophobia are nowhere near what they were in 2006, etc.
2
dj_soo 4 days ago +20
i know, let's elect the people who put them in this mess - that'll fix everything.
20
Nisiom 4 days ago +267
The british population spent 12 years voting conservative. A right wing party with right wing policies that overwhelmingly benefit the rich. The poor being poorer is pretty much what was advertised, and what was delivered as expected. The question is why the f*** are Bob the builder and Nancy the nurse consistently voting against their interests. The same will happen with Reform in the next election. Either the brits learn how to vote, or this isn't going to get better any time soon.
267
CrowLaneS41 4 days ago +87
The Tories were in power from 2010-2024. They were certainly given a chance!
87
trojan_man16 4 days ago +17
Media. The same answer everywhere in the world where conservatives are gaining power. Use social and cultural issues to manipulate the rubes into voting against their own interests.
17
Direct-Fix-2097 4 days ago +14
Nurses aren’t right wing tho? Most people in healthcare are fiercely left wing. 🤷‍♂️ Bob the builder’s a muppet tho, can’t argue with that.
14
_SpaceLord_ 4 days ago +50
Most people in health care are *either* fiercely left wing *or* fiercely right wing. There’s more than a few real f****** whackos taking care of your health. /married to a nurse, thankfully one who is fiercely left wing
50
cowboyinthejungle99 4 days ago +12
Genuinely thought the same thing until I started working for the NHS. Absolutely astounded me how many nurses and HCAs are right wing.
12
IgamOg 4 days ago +9
The answer is hate. So addictive! Every day a new hateful headline in the Daily Mail, the Telegraph, The Sun, on their Facebook an xitter. People were under threat of benefit cheats, then Polish plumbers then boat people. They had to react, Tories were the only people selling them the problem and offering a 'solution'. Like that abusive partner who convinces you that everone is out to get you and they're the only ones who can save you.
9
MundaneSchool1823 4 days ago +4
Same thing in Canada with liberals. Right wing parties are scum but a majority of people think they can pull themselves up by their bootstraps f*** everyone else
4
Beastier_ 4 days ago +3
The "right" government is now in power, and what are they doing? Correct, F*** ALL. No wonder people turn to fringe parties when the normal parties deliver f*** all that's useful to the average voter. A lot of the radicalization happening in Europe is a direct result of the parties in power not doing anything about the problems in their countries and just riding the economic wave of the 2010s.
3
mixduptransistor 4 days ago +15
I am not British, but kind of from a very far distance pay a little attention but that said I don't know what's going on day to day. THAT said, sometimes you can't turn a ship around instantly. I'm not saying that Starmer and Labour should be let off the hook forever but it seems asking them to fix problems that were stewing over a decade (or more) might take more than a year or so Obama was getting tagged with a sluggish economy during his re-election campaign, and that was mostly just remaining hangover from the 2008 collapse
15
okSawyer 4 days ago +15
Just like here in Germany. Sixteen years under the CDU and Merkel, during which the country was slowly allowed to fall into a state of decay. Then a government with left-leaning tendencies comes along, but is put in a horrible spot by Russias war, a media hate campaign, and one of its coalition partners. Now here we are back with the CDU and with the Nazis of the AfD knocking on the door. I kinda accepted, that a lot of people want this shit.
15
IgamOg 4 days ago +17
Of course you know nothing about it if you live in the right wing media bubble. They reduced immigration by 69% and are slowly improving workers rights, mending the Brexit mess and reducing poverty levels that have been growing for decades and a half. What more did you expect in a couple of years?
17
APhysicistAbroad 4 days ago +12
The highest tax and spend policy since the early 80s? Workers rights? Renters rights? Increased urgency for grid decarbonisation? Closer relationship with the EU? Continued support for Ukraine? Staying out of American wars? Loosening fiscal rules for borrowing to invest? Improved NHS waiting lists? Started the public ownership of the railways? Breakfast clubs for children?
12
burrrrrssss 4 days ago +7
conservatives: f*** everything up democrats: dont fix it immediately conservatives: *i cant believe the democrats have done this* Guess this isnt a strictly american phenomenon 
7
imjustsurfin 4 days ago +43
~~Reform~~ Repeat. As it's full of the Tories that are responsible for effing up the UK in the first place.
43
menerell 4 days ago +13
So far right politics brought them here, and they will vote far right politicians to get out of the pickle. Makes total sense.
13
nopigscannnotlookup 4 days ago +48
If brexit never occurred, would that have made any difference?
48
TheFuzzball 4 days ago +181
https://consoc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/The-Economic-Impact-of-Brexit.pdf The economy is 4% smaller due to Brexit based on this report from 6 months ago. That's what, £129 billion? The NHS budget is £220 billion.  People are probably going to vote in a man that was the driving force behind Brexit, and has stated on the record that he wants to move to an insurance-based (I.e. American) system of healthcare.  Turkeys voting for Christmas. 
181
lordnacho666 4 days ago +40
Framing it that way makes the effect look tiny. It's like saying we're living in 2022 instead of 2026, or whatever the GDP growth figures say. The real issue is going forward, if we don't rejoin, we get further and further away. Young people can't pursue opportunities across the water, people running businesses decide against doing it here, and we generally fall further and further behind.
40
wkavinsky 4 days ago +6
That 4% clears the national debt in 25 years. It's a long way from "tiny"
6
lordnacho666 4 days ago +4
You mean, if you took all of GDP growth and paid off the debt with it? You can't do that. And actually it would take longer than 25 years.
4
wkavinsky 4 days ago +5
No, if you take that missing 4% from GDP that Brexit caused, and devoted that extra income to paying off the national debt, it would be gone in 25 years. Instead of being a £100bn/year blackhole we are sinking in.
5
Digitalanalogue_ 4 days ago +40
Ironically the elderly overwhelmingly voted for brexit. They are going to get a bit of a shock when farage adopts an american insurance based system
40
DootyMcCool2000 4 days ago +2
Hahahaha if Farage were really going the America route, he'd let all the old people keep their free healthcare kinda like Medicare does here.
2
Digitalanalogue_ 4 days ago +1
And i assume all hospitals participate?
1
DootyMcCool2000 4 days ago +1
It's complicated but basically yes. Americans pay a tax into Medicare and you recieve it from the government once you're 65 with some exceptions.
1
victorspoilz 4 days ago +9
America has the most expensive healthcare system in the world and some of the worst outcomes, especially for women.
9
Pokemon_Name_Rater 4 days ago +34
EU membership was not the cause of our ills and Brexit wasn't the solution. It did mask some of the problems or mitigate them a bit, but Britain's current state, whilst compounded by Brexit, is due to policy at Westminster, not in Brussels.
34
scarab1001 4 days ago +37
Brexit was a symptom of the anger.
37
External-Praline-451 4 days ago +36
And a mass propaganda campaign via the likes of Cambridge Analytica, and years of the likes of the Daily Mail scapegoating the EU with misinformation.
36
litritium 4 days ago +25
If Brexit AND Trump never happened, "the West" would probably have a large \~60 trillion transatlantic free trade zone by now, which completely and utterly would dominate the global economy and geopolitics. The biggest and worst misconception among Brexit supporters is that if they can just escape Europe’s “overregulation” and high taxes, they’ll experience an American consumer boom—like the one the U.S. saw after the 2008 crash, with successful Big Tech companies and decent growth. What Brexit supporters completely overlook is that the U.S wealth *not* is a result of innovation and de-regulation. USA has simply borrowed an obscene amount of money—almost a trillion dollars a year. That’s *a lot* of money. In fact, it’s so much money that the U.S. would drown in inflation if Europe and the Middle East weren’t importing large amounts of dollars. The UK *doesn’t* have that option. The UK can’t borrow its way out of low economic growth. They have to trade and innovate like the rest of worlds countries.
25
grappling__hook 4 days ago +24
>If Brexit AND Trump never happened If 2008 crash hadn't happened *and* 9 years of austerity, *and* Brexit, *and* the pandemic, *and* the war in Ukraine, *and* Liz Truss's mini-budget, *and* Trump's second term then *maybe* the UK would be doing quite well. But all that shit did happen and the hole we're in has no quick or easy fixes because it's been made with many different spades. Even with sound economic policy - and preferably without the world being engulfed in some strange new shitshow every 5 minutes - it'll take years or decades to climb out.
24
drivingagermanwhip 4 days ago +3
>If Brexit AND Trump never happened, "the West" would probably have a large \~60 trillion transatlantic free trade zone by now, which completely and utterly would dominate the global economy and geopolitics. lol, no
3
PenaltyGreedy6737 4 days ago +6
it probably didn't help, britain suffers from the same ills that every other country in western europe has
6
Digitalanalogue_ 4 days ago +5
Huge. Billions of pounds were squandered not because we spent it on some experiment but because we self sabotaged our own economy. Its money that we just lost out on. And the effects are not getting better. Theyre probably staying the same. What happened to this £300m a week?
5
MorganaHenry 4 days ago +3
> What happened to this £300m a week? Borat spent it on his parties at No. 10
3
Digitalanalogue_ 4 days ago +4
Borat would have made a better PM
4
MorganaHenry 4 days ago +1
Good point
1
Jman1a 4 days ago +7
Almost like brexit wasn’t such a good idea.
7
Sportfreunde 4 days ago +12
This is what the decline of an empire looks like. They don't collapse, they just gradually decline after losing reserve currency status. This is why I disagree with people who think the US will collapse. It will just continue to decline the way the UK did.
12
ShakespeareStillKing 4 days ago +9
That's partially true. Many empires do collapse, just look at the USSR. Britain managed to land "peacefully" meaning they mostly gave up on their empire and let it go peacefully and without much internal turmoil. That being said, the cycle of empires are pretty uniform. There's always a breaking point where maintaining the empire is more resources that the wealth extracted from it. Spiraling national debt, running continous deficits, debasing of currency, overspending on military usually ends in losing the world currency status and thus the means to finance the empire. This is what happened to Spain, the Dutch, the British and now is happening to someone too.
9
xParesh 4 days ago +46
It’s actually bad everywhere in Europe. Britain is actually doing better than most countries here which is why the UK is still a major draw.
46
caiaphas8 4 days ago +33
Interesting view point. To me it does feel like 16 years of stagnation, very much a lost generation in Britain
33
xParesh 4 days ago +22
It's not even about feeling. It actually is. The banking crisis hit the UK super hard and we're much worse off than we were then. The rest of Europe is doing even worse than the UK so we're still one of the top places people want to move to. The US however has done exceptionally well but its an outlier. Given the demographic timebomb we have, I think there is more of a chance of two lost generations than a complete turnaround unless radical changes are made. Sorry to any GenZ who are reading this and had any hope things will improve for you with the current system and players.
22
alagorn01 4 days ago +44
I doubt it's going to be reform. I think Restore Britain is going to take it. People are seeing Farage for the hollow mouthpiece he is. Rupert Lowe however is an angry man who does not give a shit what people think of him. He is saying everything reform is and more, he donates (apparently) his MP salary to charities in his constituency and has a rapidly growing membership to his party. His sentiments echo perfectly those I have heard from people up and down the country for years, and he isn't Trump's puppet. He could have a real shot. Either way, I am terrified for the future, but acknowledge that severe change NEEDS to happen lest the cycle continue.
44
Silver_Switch_3109 4 days ago +11
He also got kicked out of Reform because he wasn’t sucking Farage’s d*** like all the others in Reform
11
HowYouMineFish 4 days ago +8
It won't be Restore. I'll bet they're basically unknown outside of Listnook. I honestly don't think it'll be Reform either - Farage's association with Trump is costing them, they've grabbed failed Tories and given them prime positions, thereby alienating their voters who despise 'the Uniparty', they've made a hash of the councils where they've won seats, and that's all before anti-Reform tactical voting kicks in. They'll do well in the forthcoming local elections, but I predict that'll be their high water mark.
8
nid0 4 days ago +4
As someone who has the miserable luck of being one of Ruoert Lowe's constituents, although it's a small issue in the grand scheme of things, seeing it happen locally it astounds me that his donations are legal. Donating your government salary to charities and good causes sounds fine and laudible on paper but the fact you can donate to the church, football club and lifeboat *in your own constituency*, functionally serving as very direct bribes to the community you want to vote for you, absolutely blows my mind.
4
Digitalanalogue_ 4 days ago +4
Taking all considerations into account, neither reform nor restore can resurrect britain. It needs to be a coalition government.
4
External-Praline-451 4 days ago -1
Restore is thankfully polling very low and they are even more extreme and batshit than Reform. More people support Labour, Lib Dems and the Greens, we just need to work together and vote tactically to keep Reform, Restore and the Tories out.
-1
SunnysideWoW 4 days ago -5
Restore Britain 2029! Hype!
-5
Jarkside 4 days ago +24
Didn’t Britain get a huge influx of immigrants after Brexit? So they left the EU because they couldn’t control migration, and then let in a wave of immigrants anyway? What a cluster. This is an example of referenda lead to terrible policy outcomes.
24
I-vonatinkle 4 days ago +24
That was a choice made by the Conservatives, and they are now a dead party because of it.
24
tegat 4 days ago +3
Can you please elaborate? It seems they have 20% per polling vs ~35% they had in 2020. Not great, but comeback seems quite possible. I know UK has FPTP system, but that us still a lot of electorate.
3
I-vonatinkle 4 days ago +4
Sure. Just a few points from my perspective... first being that the Conservatives in recent elections were gifted votes from working class communities because they promised to reduce immigration. They did the complete opposite of that. I highly doubt that they will get that support again. Secondly, the support the Conservatives hold currently comes mainly from the oldest demographic in the country. Reform has taken a big bite out of this bracket and will continue to do so. Lastly, I would just say that in past generations, people tended to lean right as they got older, bought houses, and felt more connected to the wider economy. The Conservatives were seen as the more fiscally responsible party, but I'm not sure that narrative still holds. Younger people since the financial crash have had a pretty rubbish time. The average first time buyer age in the UK is now 34. The FPTP system does come into play. In this past election, the Labour Party won a massive majority. Not because they got a lot of votes (only 33.7% of the electrorate) but because conservative voters went elsewhere or just didn't vote at all. I might be wrong, but this is how I currently see things.
4
tegat 4 days ago +34
They did, UK got triple the number of immigrants in comparison to immigration before Brexit. Increased immigration after Brexit is an example of politicians not doing what voters what.
34
5pin05auru5 4 days ago +2
Or rather, voters not understanding how things work, but indulging their whims regardless.
2
bbbbbbbbbblah 4 days ago +1
That was an intentional decision by the Conservatives. They promised that after we left we'd have an "Australian style points based immigration system" (you couldn't get through a speech without hearing those exact words) to replace the apparent free-for-all that we had with the EU. People thought that meant tough rules, but instead the Conservatives made it easier than ever for people to move here as virtually every job became "skilled" and eligible for visa sponsorship. There were even more insane aspects to this as well. The Conservatives changed the rules around training placements so that UK medical school graduates no longer had priority over graduates of foreign schools. This led to the ridiculous outcome where our own grads, whose degrees are heavily subsidised, couldn't get the places they wanted or couldn't get one at all. This has only now been reversed.
1
krneki534 3 days ago +1
The best part is Brexit being triggered by anti-migration sentiments, where the UK voters just voted against the government without really understanding what it was all about. anyway the UK still refuses to acknowledge the anti-migration sentiments of the nation and why every single PM has been voted out.
1
eatsgreens 4 days ago +9
How could any nation on the planet possibly go from governing 25% of humanity - and pulling all their wealth and resources in to the capital - to running a small, rainy island off the coast of Europe without losing something along the way? Unless Britain invents the next industrial leap forward it was always going to revert to mean. It doesn't matter who you elect. This is an intractable reality for the United Kingdom.
9
Available-Ad1979 4 days ago +5
Well hang on a minute we still have Gibraltar!
5
ProjectPorygon 4 days ago +12
The more the government tells you how to live whilst doing nothing to benefit the common man, the more people get driven to the extremes of politics. The same thing happened in Europe in the early 1920’s, with constant “we know better than you” policies despite the economic issues at the times. Really wish they’d focus more on their own people than funding the rich and importing c**** labour that will make the rich richer xp.
12
Mrspygmypiggy 4 days ago +8
I don’t care how poor I get, I’m not voting for the cunts that helped get us in this situation in the first place.
8
EhDeeHD 4 days ago +5
Alot of words to say brexit
5
jphamlore 4 days ago +8
Everyone has 20-10 vision deducing the flaws in other countries.
8
TyrusX 4 days ago +3
The richer are richer and richer
3
No_Communication5538 4 days ago +3
Try visiting some of the indigenous or western suburbs of Sydney areas of Australia - see some poverty and despair. This idle journalism is bollocks - but very much the zeitgeist.
3
ljacob01 4 days ago +4
Guess it’s hard to sustain your economy when you can’t mooch off of your colonies huh
4
Blackintosh 4 days ago +5
For centuries, Britain has been kept steady as an aristocracy. The lower class has been conditioned to accept poverty and sadness, as if it is a sacrifice towards keeping Britain alive. Hereditary political power, and the desire to maintain it over the long-term, has acted as a control against serious populist uprising. If the Lords didn't like someone, they'd have absolutely no chance of gaining power. It's why Britain has never fucked itself over with fascism in the way most other European counties have at one point or other. It's probably why the British media (which is mostly owned and operated by Lords and their friends) will turn on Reform in the coming year or two, to maintain the two-party system. Reform is just a tool to throw shit at Labour and keep the Tories clean until they come back to steal the value that Labour has invested back into the country. But the House of Lords has been further neutered recently, which most people view as a good thing, for valid idealist reasons. But the sad truth is that when short term thinking takes over the reins of political motivation, the worst type of people are the ones who grab them the hardest.
5
Digitalanalogue_ 4 days ago +11
The issues has become that anyone can become a lord as long as they support a politician. Therefore the hereditary nature of aristocracy has died down long time ago. When russian billionaires linked to kremlin can become lords, suddenly this balance and check on power comes into question.
11
Tacti_Kel_Nuke 4 days ago +1
That's...an interesting view ngl 🤔
1
Savage-September 4 days ago +4
Can’t say we didnt warn you. I guess it’s another Brexit benefit I suppose. The only thing broken in Britain is critical thinking. And I don’t want to hear from anybody that this has nothing to do with Brexit. F****** nonsense
4
isUKexactlyTsameasUS 4 days ago +2
the grand plan by the baddies: copy the USA, and do decades of decline to 'break' Britons, in so doing push one fifth of the bottom half into poverty and towards political deform, with an identical US style first past the post, two-party system, where there's almost no difference between. fixed it for ya.
2
ghaj56 4 days ago +2
Reform… like Brexit? How’s that working out
2
jaybizzleeightyfour 4 days ago +15
A bunch of the same Conservatives who failed the UK over the last 15 years Reforming a new party to pretend they didn't destroy the UK
15
Moistinterviewer 4 days ago +4
Vs say Germany?
4
DootyMcCool2000 4 days ago +2
And yet even with the most decisive majority in decades, the party literally called Labour has done what exactly? This should've been the government to turn at least some things around but, from what I hear, they're just diet Tories more or less.
2
ExchangeBoring 4 days ago +1
Broken England, with a bit of Broken Wales.
1
brushfuse 2 days ago +1
Whilst redistribution of wealth is a ‘dirty word,’ nothing is going to change. The wealthy will keep squirreling away cash, whilst others go to the food banks for their kids meals despite working full time jobs.
1
FroggyWinky 4 days ago -2
Scottish Independence is our only way to get this whetstone off our neck. 
-2
Abject_Breadfruit148 4 days ago +1
Easy enough to blame the rich stealing from the poor on the brown and black people.
1
justgord 4 days ago +1
YT channels worth watching - Patrick Boyle and Garys Economics : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3neJOdknqc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi265I48MdI
1
← Back to Board