· 200 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 5, 2026 at 6:41 PM

Delta cuts food and beverage service on short flights

Posted by toomuchtostop


Delta cuts food and beverage service on short flights
Journal Sentinel
Delta cuts food and beverage service on short flights
Starting on May 19, the Atlanta-based airline carrier said it will no longer provide food or beverage service on flights of 349 miles or less.

🚩 Report this post

200 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
[deleted] 6 days ago +2093
[deleted]
2093
cedriceent 5 days ago +172
I'm assuming that for the difference in price alone, you could get an equal amount of m&m's at the supermarket.
172
Momik 5 days ago +99
Well, yeah, but only these M&M’s have been close to jet fuel 👍
99
rclonecopymove 5 days ago +255
Yeah, in an effort to make it less obvious they're bringing the price back down to $1 but they will be changing the name to just M. You only get one.
255
[deleted] 5 days ago +121
[removed]
121
justasque 5 days ago +36
I always bring food, and generally prepare for at least 24 hours in transit, regardless of expected flight length, mostly because I’ve experienced a lot of delays/cancellations/shortened layovers, etc. I’ve slept in an airport more than once due to weather or issues with the plane, and I’ve had flights that should have been a short hop turn into an hours-long ordeal. I get that it isn’t always easy to bring food. But every now and again it really makes a difference.
36
MentalDisintegrat1on 5 days ago +35
I bring my own empty water bottle ( fill up after the TSA) , protein bars and fruits it's never been a issue.
35
BlueHighwindz 6 days ago +3404
Damn, I really liked the little Biscoff cookie, half a cup of soda, and nothing else they gave.
3404
thegreatjamoco 5 days ago +349
When I flew American and they gave me the whole can, I must’ve made a face cause the stewardess was like “we’re not delta sweetie”
349
Rennika 5 days ago +70
I flew with them this past week, but I didn’t want to bring attention to it because I thought they forgot 😂
70
danceswsheep 5 days ago +19
The trick on Delta flights is to ask them for two drinks; then they’ll just give you the whole can.
19
HauntedCemetery 5 days ago +25
You can literally just ask for the whole can and they will 100% give it to you.
25
WarDEagle 5 days ago +7
I’ve been flying Delta almost exclusively for a decade plus and have gotten the entire can every time. 
7
SilkySmoothRalph 5 days ago +630
Nothing to do with Delta, but I bought 300 Biscoff biscuits in a catering pack for £12. I ate about 100 over a month or so and now can’t stand them any more. So there’s probably some kind of moral message there or something.
630
BlueHighwindz 5 days ago +191
Love Biscoffs, I make pie crusts out of them, they're better than Graham Crackers.
191
Head-Interest-4438 5 days ago +71
They're really expensive at the grocery stores near me, so I've been buying Speculoos. But Biscoffs dipped in milk would be my death row meal.
71
Albort 5 days ago +36
i found them at costco, like a 4 pack of 25s for like $15 i think.
36
Head-Interest-4438 5 days ago +24
You just did terrible things to my waist line and I love you for it.
24
TedWazowski 5 days ago +33
As an aircraft mechanic, I'm tired of biscoff and stroopwaffles.
33
BobBlawSLawDawg 5 days ago +14
...I'm just going to wait here til you start talking about the ranger, Strider, also known as Aragorn son of Arathorn taking Frodo to see Elrond at Rivendell when Frodo was wounded by the blade of one of the Nazgul.
14
Halgy 5 days ago +22
That's how I quit drinking. Just drank different liquors enough that I got sick of each in turn.
22
Sundevil13 5 days ago +3
Excuse me flight attendant this guy wants me to have his biscoffs
3
mdegiuli 5 days ago +212
Unless you're only flying legs that are less than 45min, you'll still get them. I'm fact, you'll get more stuff cause theyre EXPANDING service on medium haul flights
212
mythrilcrafter 5 days ago +60
Which isn't too big a deal to me, personally. Whenever I fly Delta, I have to connect from GSP to Atlanta Hartsfield before I get to any of my actual destinations and the flight from GSP to ATL is so fast is feels like as soon as we reach cruise altitude it's already time to prep for landing.
60
FriendlyDespot 4 days ago +3
Delta files GSP-ATL with a 22,000 feet cruising altitude, and the aircraft usually spends around 2 minutes and 30 seconds at that altitude before descending again. It feels like something's gone wrong the first few times you experience it.
3
ro536ud 5 days ago +7
What do you mean by expanding service on medium flights? I didn’t see any mention of that in the article
7
mdegiuli 5 days ago +25
Article is garbage but here's a quote from the NYT on it: "The airline will add full beverage and snack service for the Delta Comfort and Delta Main cabins on flights of 350 or more miles. The airline said this meant a larger total number of flights would ultimately have beverage and snack service." - source: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/05/travel/delta-airlines-flight-snack-policy-update.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
25
HavoKDarK 5 days ago +45
Ask for a can, it usually works for me
45
filthy_harold 5 days ago +22
United usually just hands me the can and I fly basic economy.
22
funkhero 5 days ago +13
Has worked every time I've done this in the 20+ years I've been doing it.
13
gamemasterjd 5 days ago +4
Honestly since covid more times than not they just give me the can in my experience.
4
opajamashimasuuu 5 days ago +94
Their sushi sucked too. Was dry as a bone. I am an idiot for even eating airline sushi anyway.
94
nobadhotdog 5 days ago +57
i'll never victim blame but you're trying me
57
toasterdees 5 days ago +241
Yes you are
241
jc83po 5 days ago +32
Would you rather, airline sushi or gas station sushi?
32
Fried_puri 5 days ago +81
Airplane sushi 100%. Airplane food is rigorously safety checked and packaged and food safety incidents are extremely rare. It might not taste great sometimes but I’m not rolling the dice like I would be with gas station food. 
81
ice-eight 5 days ago +48
Yeah I watched this documentary about an incident where both pilots got sick from eating the fish and a passenger had to land the plane. Surely they must be serious about food safety now
48
flopsygoose 5 days ago +34
They are serious about food safety now, and don't call me Shirley.
34
edfitz83 5 days ago +17
I speak jive.
17
rational-hare 5 days ago +18
I saw that. It’s a good thing the doctor had the lasagna.
18
jc83po 5 days ago +26
Airplane sushi is the safe bet, but if something goes wrong you're trapped in that phone booth bathroom. Gas station sushi is higher risk, but you can be sick in your own home.
26
Jellz 5 days ago +28
No no, you're trapped in the phone booth bathroom *if you're lucky enough* to be the first person who gets sick from the airplane sushi. The second, third, and so on are trapped outside of the bathroom with everyone else who's super unlucky to be trapped with people unable to get into a bathroom.
28
edfitz83 5 days ago +9
Years ago my wife and son were sick from some “coming out both ends” bug. I wasn’t affected, or so I thought. Monday, had to fly from Chicago to Houston, which I did roughly once every 3 weeks. About an hour into the flight, the ass-end part hit me hard. Note, by then the wife and son had mostly recovered, so they forgot about the sympathy demanded and didn’t care they passed the bug to be at the start of a business trip. I was getting up every 20 mins to have explosive diarrhea. Thankfully I was in first class in an aisle seat, so I didn’t have to irritate others. Unfortunately, when we got into long final (aircraft approach pattern) I only managed one more shits before the FA’s told me I couldn’t get up anymore, and would have to shit my pants if necessary. Through serious mind control an pain, I kept it in until we landed. I asked the FA’s the landing gate, because I knew IAH pretty well. So I was one of the first off the plane and I knew exactly where the restroom was - to take yet another brownish water shit. Throughout the day (at the office), I was feeling increasingly worse. I went to dinner with about 10 colleagues, including our SVP. When the main course was served, I told her that I was so sick I could not eat and I needed to get to my hotel and a bathroom ASAP. She said “go”. At the hotel, the puking started in addition to the colonoscopy prep type of shits. The next day, I showed up at work/meetings over an hour late, looking green. My SVP told me I could go back to my hotel if I felt too sick to be there. She was a gem.
9
PM_ME_YOUR_BIG_BITS 5 days ago +12
I appreciate you sharing these mental images that will live with me for years.
12
filthy_harold 5 days ago +8
Real food poisoning takes about a day to hit you.
8
Haltopen 5 days ago +4
You'll have landed by the time you get symptoms, and then you get to destroy a public airport toilet thats basically impossible to clog as opposed to your home toilet that you have to smell and that probably clogs if you put more than three squares of toilet paper in it
4
Duel_Option 5 days ago +21
“Rigorously” As someone that’s been inside some of those production plants…I disagree lol
21
[deleted] 5 days ago +4
[deleted]
4
opajamashimasuuu 5 days ago +5
I don’t want to be the “akshually” nerd guy but it’s pretty usual to add mirin to sushi rice. But it shouldn’t be overly sweet tasting.
5
aestusveritas 5 days ago +668
These headlines are really going for reaction rather than context (nothing new). Previously Delta did not have service on flights under 250 miles (American doesn't for anything under 250, United doesn't for anything under 300) and then had a mid-tier band of flights that just did an "express water" service for flights between 250-499, and then full service on anything over 500 miles. They're basically getting rid of the mid-tier and doing full service on anything over 350, because on flights less than 350 the flight attendants have like 15 minutes to run through the cabin to do service due to take off/touch down timing. This means they're actually ADDING full service to more flights (600) than the flights they're ending express water service on (450). So they're not taking away full service on ANY flights and adding it to a bunch. I get that it's easy to be like "what the hell, we're being robbed" and I'm not saying this is a perfect plan by Delta, but it's a little more nuanced than just them stopping all service on short flights.
668
Meme_Burner 5 days ago +131
TLDR: To get Beverage Service on a flight, the flight has to be: American: 250 miles United: 300 miles SouthWest: 251 miles Delta(NOW): 350 miles was 251 miles Flight time: 250 miles\~45-60 min 300 miles\~50-65 min 400 miles\~60-75 min AKA if I was flying from MEM to ATL \~52 min it will now not have beverage service on Delta or BOS to PHL \~62 min, or ORD to STL\~45 min
131
Innovator-X 5 days ago +12
r/theydidthemath
12
Youdontuderstandme 5 days ago +138
Unpopular opinion: I don’t need a drink and a snack on an hour +/- flight. Is it nice? I guess. Will I miss it? No. I want to say back in the day everyone on the plane got a meal for longer flights (3 hours plus). There was more leg room. Etc etc. So yeah - air travel is less accommodating than it used to be.
138
tenshillings 5 days ago +13
I could totally use 2 beers in that 1 hour. Thats why I fly comfort plus. (Not really me, but other people I sit by on flights that slam cans of wine at 6am PST)
13
Youdontuderstandme 5 days ago +3
Gonna have to fly 1st class for the booze.
3
tenshillings 5 days ago +6
Comfort plus in Delta gets free drinks.
6
mythrilcrafter 5 days ago +18
Yeah, I fly into the ATL hub (from GSP) before connecting to my actual destination and that flight has never gotten service due to being under the 200 mile range, quite literally as soon as we hit cruising altitude we're prepping for landing. If the flight was from Charlotte to ATL (257 miles), they would have just barely enough time to do drink service before having to sprint through to take waste before the pilots make final approach.
18
Excusemytootie 5 days ago +10
350 miles? I wouldn’t care at that distance, you’re up and back down again.
10
SleepingToDreaming 6 days ago +3996
Coincidence that they announced this after Spirit went belly up?  I think not.  
3996
DankVectorz 6 days ago +1287
Yes it is. Although they’re cutting service on 400 short flights (talking like 1 hour flight time) they are making 600 limited service flights into full service flights.
1287
shwarma_heaven 5 days ago +787
That would actually be decent. I don't care about soda and nuts on a one hour flight. But it would be nice to get something more than just a bag of chips on a 4-hour flight
787
snesericreturns 5 days ago +379
For the price we pay and bullshit we have to put up with from ticket purchase to the time you plant your ass down in that stiff, cramped seat, the FA should be gargling our nuts, not handing out bags of them.
379
Passan 5 days ago +88
Just imagining the logistics of that happening.
88
GaZzErZz 5 days ago +10
I think everyone would just have to take turns going to the cockpit. It's the only way to maintain order
10
snesericreturns 5 days ago +59
It can be done. [The math is solid.](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DzmehB3K4dQ&t=103s&pp=2AFnkAIB0gcJCU8Co7VqN5tD)
59
shwarma_heaven 5 days ago +27
Middle out... it's gotta be middle out.
27
purple_plasmid 5 days ago +13
Or for those of us without nuts, they should be munching our pretzels.
13
Snlxdd 5 days ago +328
Yeah, people aren't reading the article: >The Atlanta-based airline carrier will no longer provide any food or beverage service on flights of 349 miles or less I've never wanted free snacks on a flight that short and definitely don't need them.
328
canada432 5 days ago +214
You're always free to refuse them. It's not about needing it, its that they're so greedy that $1 worth of cookies and sprite with your $350 plane ticket is too much service for them to provide if they're not absolutely required to by either competition or regulation.
214
The_GOATest1 5 days ago +208
My guess is they are spending more on carrying those items via fuel than actually buying them
208
Melbuf 5 days ago +126
also time management, 1/2 the time they never even seem to finish the service before the landing decent starts so if you are at the back of the plane you never got anything anyway
126
tnstaafsb 5 days ago +51
Yeah this. I always thought it was funny watching them scramble on those short haul flights to get everyone their tiny plastic cup of soda knowing full well they were never going to make it. Just let me watch my single episode of a Netflix show and leave me alone.
51
RaNdomMSPPro 5 days ago +27
t-shirt cannon, but for cookies would speed this right up.
27
Jkbucks 5 days ago +21
Just pump a slurry of ginger ale and biscotti through the oxygen mask system
21
Melbuf 5 days ago +7
i like the way you think
7
Wloak 5 days ago +22
This is the best guess. This would be a sub 1hr flight, they almost never complete drink service in the first place because they've got about 20 minutes to get through the whole cabin.
22
fattmarrell 5 days ago +39
Not a bad assumption honestly
39
Battlejesus 5 days ago +28
A correct one. More weight equals more fuel which is expensive as hell right now
28
lordcheeto 5 days ago +14
And fuel efficiency already sucks on those short haul flights, since they spend less time at cruising speed.
14
Battlejesus 5 days ago +8
Modern airliners get a lot of their fuel efficiency from the wingtip devices as well, which only really works at cruise. Couple that with the soupy air on the ground, those engines are hogs
8
RangerLt 5 days ago +17
And more fuel needs more fuel to carry the additional fuel.
17
Rednys 5 days ago +41
It's probably helpful to cut down on turnaround time.  Stocking beverages for a 5 hour flight makes sense, not on a 1 hour flight.
41
mschuster91 5 days ago +43
>It's not about needing it, its that they're so greedy that $1 worth of cookies and sprite with your $350 plane ticket is too much service for them to provide if they're not absolutely required to by either competition or regulation. Someone [did the math for this](https://atleurope.aero/short-haul-the-methodology-calculations-for-fuel-cost-saving/) and made a formula. Shaving off 1 kg of load on a 350 mile/563 km flight saves 1.68 kg of fuel per flight, so given Spirit's average utilization of [11 flight hours per day](https://crankyflier.com/2025/04/01/spirit-to-transition-its-model-to-fly-only-on-peak-travel-days/) (which I assume Delta comes pretty close to on short flights) corresponding to roughly 10 flights, that 1 kg of load saves about 16 kg of fuel a day. Assuming they have 200 passengers per plane on average and carry water and snacks with a weight of 500g per unit for 1/3rd of them, that's 33 kg of load they don't need to carry and 528 kg of fuel saved. **Per day**. And that's a conservative estimate - depending on how aggressive the upsell tactics and sales estimations are, it is not unfeasible to assume that beverages and snacks can weigh far more than my napkin math, and thus the fuel cost rises. Aggregate that over a year and suddenly it's a loooooot of savings in fuel to cut down on snacks and beverages.
43
Solo_is_dead 5 days ago +9
r/Theydidthemath
9
GloomyIndividual3965 5 days ago +10
To finish the equation, 528kg of jet fuel is around 173 gallons. At $4.50ish per gallon that's $780/day, or $284k/year. I'm not sure how many planes/routes this impacts, but that's a lot of money spent flying cookie and bottles of water.
10
jormugandr 5 days ago +3
don't forget, the extra fuel also has weight, which impacts efficiency as well.
3
Snlxdd 5 days ago +75
But they're also expanding service on longer flights, kinda the opposite of greed. If anything, I'd rather them just have an option to grab a snack as you're boarding, cheaper for them and more convenient for passengers.
75
Orleanian 5 days ago +22
It's not the $1 worth of pretzel. It's the thousands of dollars and hours of labor worth of shipping, transporting, loading, storing, and other various logistics that go into getting you that pretzel. Of all the things that an airline might do to cut costs, this is the cut that I'm most amenable to.
22
KamikazeArchon 5 days ago +4
Those tickets are not $350. They're $100-$200. Airlines have one of the narrowest profit margins around, in the 2-5% range. They're not "greedy", they're "barely staying in business". And it's almost certainly not about the money cost of the food items, it's the flight attendant time/effort plus the *fuel cost* of the food and drink due to weight. Notably, fuel cost per pound per mile is higher on short flights than long ones (because takeoff fuel scales faster with weight). In other words, the airline probably doesn't care about the cookies. It cares about the *water*. Drinks are heavy.
4
PutinsRustedPistol 5 days ago +23
It’s non-sensical. By the time they’re done handing shit out the plane will be landing. And that’s if they even have enough time to do it. You’ll up and down in what? An hour and a half?
23
agremeister 5 days ago +7
They're so greedy that the Big 3 US carriers *literally operate flights at a loss* and are only profitable because of their credit card programs. When airlines are already operating flights on razor thin margins (and the big 3 US carriers are all right around 0 profit margin on their actual flying), the cost of fuel going up is a major problem
7
Adultery 5 days ago +21
There’s contractor payroll/labor to get those snacks on and off the plane, and additional work for flight attendants, cleaners, etc. You don’t need a free sodie pop on a 1-hour flight.
21
TheCh0rt 5 days ago +3
I've found if you request something they have it.
3
garytyrrell 5 days ago +14
Will anyone think of the alcoholics? Let us byob at least :)
14
tinywienergang 5 days ago +35
This is for flights that are 350 miles and under. That’s less than an hour of flight time usually. It’s a coincidence.
35
scrndude 6 days ago +322
Coincidence they announced this when oil is hitting $150+ a barrel?
322
wrongwayup 6 days ago +74
[Oil hasn't passed $115](https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/RWTCD.htm). Jet fuel has (multiply [these prices](https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/eer_epjk_pf4_rgc_dpgD.htm) by 42 USG/bbl, anything over $3.71/USG is over $150/bbl), but the distinction between the two is still very important to airlines, and especially to Delta who owns a refinery.
74
fujidust 5 days ago +7
Oil hasn’t passed $115 *yet*.
7
parker2020 6 days ago +106
I hate that orange b****** more than the next person but oil hasn’t been higher than 125
106
SookiSwann 6 days ago +101
Now look at the delivery price for jet fuel. The oil futures price isn’t the whole story. It’s double what it was in February.
101
Thehealthygamer 5 days ago +3
Physical barrels of oil have been selling at 150+, saw a report that Singapore has bought some at $200/barrel.
3
godsenfrik 6 days ago +9
Yet. I've never used the remindme thing before but now might be the time.
9
WOW_SUCH_KARMA 5 days ago +7
Spirit charged for snacks, so no, I’m not sure they’re related at all.
7
UnknwnUser 5 days ago +172
It's flights under 350 miles. I looked it up and that's an average of a 40-50 minute flight. Honestly it's not the end of the world. You'll be off the flight before they could have started handing out the snacks
172
[deleted] 5 days ago +27
[removed]
27
Spare-Half796 5 days ago +4
My friend needs to fly for work regularly and one of the routes she takes often doesn’t even have a cruising altitude, they literally finish their climb and start their descent immediately
4
Nerevar1924 5 days ago +3
It's nice. Flying is a miserable experience that gets more miserable every decade. I can't afford first class, I'm well over 6 feet tall, and I've got an irrational fear that something is gonna happen during takeoff and landing. I'm not a nervous wreck or anything, but I don't find flying to be particularly pleasant. A little Dr Pepper and some pretzels on even just an hour flight is a nudge towards feeling a little better about the day.
3
OnTheEveOfWar 5 days ago +12
I fly southwest a lot and they don’t do a beverage service on flights that short. They don’t have the time to serve everyone and clean up trash.
12
yanknga 5 days ago +20
They’re short flights I believe. The kind where you ascend to cruising altitude and immediately start your descent. I never understood why they rolled those carts out for that. It seemed like a huge hassle. I assume most people can survive an hour or less without some pretzels and a short clear plastic cup half filled with soda.
20
First_Shes_Sweet 6 days ago +482
As travel becomes more expensive and less enticing they will only lose business, raising costs... I don't get it. 
482
camelCaseCoffeeTable 6 days ago +47
As with many other industries, airlines have learned you’re not the most profitable customer to sell to. They would be happy to lose 10 economy customers if they got one first class customer. Whether this happens or not remains to be seen, but their ideal world be to lose your business and gain more profitable first class business.
47
bloodlessempress 5 days ago +30
There was a economics professor who talked about the danger of that but I don't remember his name. Basically though he said that businesses continually pursuing those high income customers start competing over a rapidly diminishing client base, which would lead either to one company gradually monopolizing an industry or the industry collapsing as they attempt to focus on ever higher income earners that can eventually just afford stuff bespoke rather than through large multinational companies or those companies burn out all their cash and collapse. Like for example one company gets really good at getting those earning $300k a year, so you start trying to cater to those who make over $500k a year.  I might have jumbled that up a little but the end result is that the race to the top of Rich Client Exclusivity can turn into a financially deadly trap.
30
ArchdukeToes 5 days ago +19
Meanwhile, you have companies like Ryan Air making vast sums of money while practically forcing their customers to flap all the way to their destination while being whipped by the cabin crew.
19
SEA_tide 5 days ago +8
Ryanair is cautioning that it isn't doing as well due to higher fuel costs and higher overall travel costs discouraging people from traveling. The US market is also different than the European market in that distances tend to be longer and labor costs are higher. people who say that Europe has a lot of labor protections and stuff don't realize that European Airlines are constantly creating subsidiaries and contracting out services in order to pay their employees less. Ryanair has operated flights where it was essentially a virtual airline in that every worker touching the plane worked for a different company. Ryanair itself is actually multiple airlines based in different countries in order to take advantage of certain labor laws.
8
Alexis_J_M 6 days ago +327
Like most people I buy plane tickets based on price, not whether they give me terrible food to eat on board.
327
zipykido 6 days ago +103
You’ll still have to pay more and get less. 
103
dragnansdragon 6 days ago +16
"Tea-Mobile: get more" -Catherine Zeta Jones
16
frenchfreer 6 days ago +77
Man, it’s really wild to see what we assume are real people defend billion dollar corporations make the flying experience shittier for everyone because it makes them feel what, tough, or maybe gives some sense of superiority because you’re okay buying a $7 bottled water?
77
stegosaurus1337 5 days ago +10
If you read the article (or reporting on the same issue from a more reputable source than whatever this is), you would see this actually represents a net increase in service. ~9% of daily flights are losing snack service, but ~14% are being upgraded to full service. The headline just omits that second part for clicks.
10
TheLizardKing89 6 days ago +40
Who’s buying $7 waters? Bring an empty from home.
40
SelfUnimpressed 5 days ago +10
This anti-corporation sneering is so much less interesting than the reality, which is just that there's just a weird and very interesting confluence of stated vs. revealed preference that happens around this stuff. People buy airfare based on how c**** the airfare is, primarily. This is how they make their decision. Most people are not adjusting their willingness to spend based on anything other than how c**** the ticket is. And then people get on the airplane on cut-rate airlines and they hate it. They bought the c**** thing that sucks and they're mad that it's not the more expensive thing that doesn't suck as much. That's weird! And it's also a problem, because it means every airline's incentives are just to drive down the ticket price as much as possible, even at the expense of other things that customers eventually discover they do care about. If you don't compete on price, customers just don't buy tickets on your airline -- it's the single most important buying variable. But then a lot of customers who hated the cut-rate version of flying make their decision the exact same way again the next time! The world is full of people who flew Spirit because it was c****, hated it, and then flew it again because it was c**** again, and hated it, rinse and repeat. Again, this is very interesting and weird! Nobody is evil here. The corporations are responding to customers' revealed preferences, which is mostly just "make the tickets c****." Not reacting to these revealed preferences means you lose and your company dies, especially in the airline industry where margins are super thin. Customers are buying he product based on their revealed preferences (i.e. cheapest ticket plz), but then reacting to the product based on their stated preferences instead (free stuff during the flight, no nickel-and-diming, etc.). It's a strange dynamic, and a very interesting one, IMO.
10
M4rshmall0wMan 6 days ago +4
People will always have to travel. And they’ll usually choose the cheapest option, regardless of amenities. 
4
lalavieboheme 6 days ago +18
lose business to what? trains?
18
First_Shes_Sweet 6 days ago +50
Lose business... To people who decide not to travel because it used to be fun and now it's not. 
50
3McChickens 6 days ago +24
I don’t choose to travel because I get to ride a plane.
24
rhudgins32 6 days ago +14
Not who you replied to, but I dont believe this is the point. There are ways for the general public to travel and vacation without planes. Road trips are fun when gas isnt 4.50.
14
RYouNotEntertained 5 days ago +7
Dude they took away snacks on 45-minute flights. Is that seriously something that will ruin a trip for you? 
7
ScrewAttackThis 5 days ago +4
Don't threaten me with a good time. Traveling by train is great.
4
plain_handle 6 days ago +222
aaand it is never going back to how it was. ever.
222
Gabarne 5 days ago +34
350 miles is such a short distance. Im surprised they even did anything for a flight that long, probably barely more than an hour
34
Potential_One1 5 days ago +9
Honestly, idc if I'm not getting a diet coke and Biscoff cookie on my 40-minute flight; it's the fact that this is how they choose to save money when the CEO is bringing in $27+ million a year
9
TuctDape 6 days ago +87
Is this one Biden's fault too?
87
ChicagoAuPair 5 days ago +35
It’s Reagan’s. In a direct line it is Reagan’s fault. The merits of Carter’s deregulation are up for debate; but the implementation of the deregulation under Reagan is what gave us the current race to the bottom.
35
UltimateGlimpse 5 days ago +3
It’s Biden’s fault for letting Merrick Garland not get justice on behalf of the American people.
3
Goodrun31 5 days ago +9
Usually on short flights, they just say that there is too much turbulence serve drinks, and no one ever questions it.
9
HandstandsMcGoo 5 days ago +7
Good They're just in the way of the bathrooms anyway Handing out Biscoff and Sun Chips for 20 mins
7
danroyj 5 days ago +7
I always pack a piece of chicken, a piece of broccoli, a corn tortilla and one other thing.
7
Clean-Mention-4254 5 days ago +8
How close are we to going row by row asking everyone to kick in a few bucks for gas?
8
LengthClean 6 days ago +215
You can thank US and Israel for this. Started an unnecessary war. We’re all paying for it. Every way possible.
215
timmy6169 5 days ago +9
Because they cut service for flights that are under an hour? Have you ever flown a short haul flight? 10 min to get to altitude, another x amount of time for the FA's to get the service cart ready, another 10-15 min to distribute everything and then them collecting it some 10 min later before descending. So as much as I love me a Biscoff, I see 0 things wrong with them doing this. They expanded the service on longer flights as well.
9
[deleted] 6 days ago +33
[deleted]
33
LemonMania 5 days ago +3
squid games irl
3
phenolic72 5 days ago +6
This is for super short flights (<350 miles). Not a great headline.
6
RLewis8888 5 days ago +6
They stopped serving on most of those short flights years ago.
6
AdmiralJarJar 6 days ago +57
Airlines will slowly just morph into spirit's barebones low cost low service business model, except of course they won't lower prices they'll just instead turn it into bigger profits.
57
Politicsboringagain 6 days ago +23
The first international flight I took was with Caribbean Airline in 2005. It wasn't even first class and they gave us dinner and even a glass of campaign. Now when I take the same flight all we get is a cookie and a soda. 
23
a_velis 6 days ago +24
In the 1990s domestic flight came with meal service in economy if the flight was around meal time. That's long gone.
24
gangy86 5 days ago +3
Yeah I definitely miss those pita pockets with ham and cheese back in the day with American lol
3
dogpharts 5 days ago +12
I flew to Hawaii this year. 8 hour flight. No in flight meals for those of us in steerage- I mean- economy.
12
RYouNotEntertained 5 days ago +3
Spirit’s prices *were* lower 🤔 
3
torioto 5 days ago +5
Then I cut Delta from my short flights.
5
Bakersquare 5 days ago +6
Fuckers charge me and arm and a leg least they can do is give me warm soda and a bag of nuts 
6
Spiritual_Extent_187 5 days ago +5
That’s why I buy hot food and eat it on the plan, like bbq ribs and ramen
5
BobBlawSLawDawg 5 days ago +6
In the grand scheme of things, this is an insignificant reminder of how insignificant you are to large corporations. You will pay more. You will get less. Hope you make it to your destination safely, at least.
6
elibutton 5 days ago +5
This industry really ticks me off. They always talk about costs this, fuel prices, they reduce seats and cabin sizes, and now make it a standard to charge for any and all baggage. It's a damn gimmick when you want to reserve a flight because of all the additional costs and fees. And they always have labor relation / contracting issues. And to top it off, they always seem to come through with record profits. That's what was reported last year - they didn't lose money, they didn't break even, oh no - they made record profits. Greedy ass bastards, and it's the mgmt and leadership that makes all the $$
5
Acadia02 5 days ago +4
I’d rather not deal with talking to people and them squeezing that cart up and down the aisle for half a soda and a bag of pretzels.
4
SamuelHuzzahAdams 5 days ago +5
😂 bro ya’ll were only handing out peanuts and cookies. “Food Services” was already doing a lot of heaving lifting
5
Conscious-War5920 6 days ago +51
I feel like we were in the golden period of travel a few years back. I fear that the next era of travel will be more expensive and mainly for the upper class.
51
ChicagoAuPair 5 days ago +18
It only seemed like a golden age because costs were temporarily down in the classic conservative race to the bottom. The same reason dumb people think their taxes being lower for a couple years mean things are better, as they start to slowly rise again. This has been brewing since Reagan fucked over the implementation of deregulation.
18
LittleKitty235 5 days ago +6
We will now be stuck with high costs and the expectations of poor service as well.
6
silverum 6 days ago +19
It's much more likely if the energy/fuel costs don't come down thanks to Trump and Republicans f****** everything up out of ideological commitment, that there are multiple more failures ala Spirit and the carriers that remain won't have as much ability to 'fill in' the market left behind (again, because the energy cost will continue to f*** over whoever is left.) I'd bet on a general decline in air travel absent some pretty significant changes in the situation.
19
Strange_Library5833 5 days ago +14
I fly all the time and this doesn't bother me a bit. Who cares if you get a free water on a 35 minute flight.
14
MissionLet7301 5 days ago +3
Yeah realistically most people are buying tickets for short haul flights like that based on "Does that flight get me to my destination by x time on that day? And is it the cheapest flight that does so?", they're not looking for if you get a free bag of pretzels.
3
Charlie_Warlie 6 days ago +19
Sometimes it is a little silly. Like I'm going Indy to Chicago, takes 15 minutes to get up to altitude, then the snack cart comes and I'm usually at the tail end, then I need to scarf my snack and drink before descent starts in 5 minutes.
19
the_eluder 6 days ago +8
Exactly. I'd say a flight time of under 1:30 you should be able to make it without being provided a drink. However, you should be able to carry 1 beverage with you on board, like a 12-20oz bottle.
8
hank_z 5 days ago +10
Airplanes aren't movie theaters. People carry food and drinks onto flights all the time. You can't bring liquids through security, but every airport has food vendors and free water refill stations for filling your water bottle after you pass the security checkpoint.
10
[deleted] 6 days ago +19
[deleted]
19
DCrebuilds 6 days ago +11
These fights are all less than hour, having the staff run through was basically a nuisance
11
Tim-in-CA 5 days ago +4
Now if you want a drink, you'll have to purchase those $4.00 Cokes before you get on the plane. Next they will install coin s**** for the bathrooms. That's the REAL enshitification!
4
poppop702025 5 days ago +4
Lets lock up the rest rooms as well😡
4
redmch257 5 days ago +3
You're going to need a passcode you'll only get from the attendant after purchasing $10 water 
3
eat_a_burrito 5 days ago +4
How much is a can of coke? This is the decision to save money? How about trim some VP/SVP/CLevel salary m'kay.
4
HoratioPornBlower 5 days ago +4
I am sick of enshitification. It’s a small thing, not getting a drink or a snack but it’s just another thing in this race to the bottom that is line goes up capitism.
4
AngiQueenB 5 days ago +4
Of course they did. Not even surprised at this point
4
Nohvah 5 days ago +4
Delta screwed me so hard this past weekend that I never want to fly them again unless there are zero other options. HORRIBLE carrier.
4
ForgTheSlothful 5 days ago +5
Oh…after the loss of spirit… Tin foil hat says major airlines had a play in 2024 elections
5
Man-e-questions 5 days ago +3
At least they are being honest about it unlike Southwest who just started saying there is “turbulence “ so they can’t serve drinks anymore
3
GreenTrees797 5 days ago +3
Well that’s never coming back. 
3
Douglesby 5 days ago +3
“Exploitative Mega-Profitable Company Makes Something Else About Itself Shittier to Squeeze More Profit Out of its Consumer Base” should be the title of every single one of these kinds of articles. Capitalism is not compatible with human life.
3
OneIntroduction5459 5 days ago +3
Thanks Ed! Most expensive flights with facade of luxury but core is turning into Spirit. Currently Delta is running on monopoly from all mergers and the airlines eaten by it.
3
Siakim43 5 days ago +3
Where was the FTC when all these airlines, banks, hospitals were merging? Enshittification is too real. We need Lina Khan back.
3
OohDeLaLi 5 days ago +3
Airlines can hardly afford to fly anymore. ...in the USA.
3
Weary_Necessary_2434 5 days ago +3
I figured they basically did that a long time ago. It has been hit or miss for at least a decade for me on short flights.
3
RubyR4wd 5 days ago +3
Would not be a big deal if the airport didn't r*** you on prices
3
Kevin686766 5 days ago +3
I really don't mind this at all.  If it reduces the amount of people moving down the center aisle of the plane I will sacrifice my c**** snacks.
3
Worm_Man_ 5 days ago +3
Honestly at that distance it’s about 30-40 minutes in air max. That gives stewardess about 10-15 minutes to serve and whatnot between takeoff and landing. I’m not sweating it.
3
Opie045 5 days ago +3
Couldn’t they have the snacks and a bottle of water in the seat before take off?
3
DNew_42 5 days ago +3
Lol, Delta has been cutting food & bev service even on longer flights for years. "Too turbulent" to continue when the entire flight is smooth ... multiple times on the same leg over a couple of years... a coincidence, or deliberate?
3
westgate141pdx 5 days ago +3
That’s it, this was the last straw.
3
United_Bus3467 5 days ago +3
Bunch of c**** asses. For what they charge on airfare compared to competitors...there goes the further enshittification of their brand.
3
MenageTaj 5 days ago +3
Goodbye Spirit Air, goodbye affordability
3
Different-Courage679 5 days ago +3
The snacks suck anyway. I’d rather bring my own drink that I buy after going through security
3
NYCNatv 4 days ago +3
Paywall for the article but as a consumer I’m not surprised. Who wants to be the next Spirit airlines? Flying used to be a good experience. Now we are just human cargo.
3
dblan9 6 days ago +16
Should leadership take a pay cut? No, cut $0.50 cans of soda and $0.30 pretzels so that we can fill our budget holes.
16
TheJBerg 6 days ago +13
I think you’re vastly overestimating the costs of those consumables at the scale they purchase them
13
MicahGhost 5 days ago +5
What are you talking about? These flights did not have soda? They were express service flights which only had water and coffee to drink. Delta is actually increasing service on the 350-500 mile flights from express to full service flights so they will actually have soda now. Please don’t comment on things you have no idea about.
5
Key-Monk6159 5 days ago +6
This may be unpopular but if you can’t go up to 1.5 hours without a snack and drink then you have bigger problems. Maybe they should just have small water bottles on a cart when you board if it’s really an issue.
6
hpotul 5 days ago +6
Spirit just died, at least wait a week.
6
[deleted] 5 days ago +5
[removed]
5
lastjedi23 5 days ago +3
If the flight is under 2 hours you don't need a bathroom. Gut it and replace with seats. ^/s
3
← Back to Board