The same FCC that just approved a tv merger deal going over the maximum single ownership amount?
That FCC
549
BracolzMar 23, 2026
+69
Was looking to this comment
69
Historical-Edge-9332Mar 23, 2026
+69
Democrats are so f****** toothless. But I guess that makes sense given the average age of sitting Democrats
Edit: the downvote parade from daring to criticize democrats in any way shape or form is wild.
I hate republicans more than democrats. Republicans are pure evil. It’s also okay to criticize dems.
69
OhItsBeenBroughtenMar 23, 2026
+89
In what way could they have prevented the FCC from doing this?
89
[deleted]Mar 23, 2026
+2
[deleted]
2
dragonmp93Mar 23, 2026
+39
So you are asking why the Democrats don't ignore every rule, regulation, court order, moral boundary, the constitution like the Republicans always do ?
39
OhItsBeenBroughtenMar 23, 2026
+14
They really want to get people locked up and killed for no reason because they’re bored and mad things aren’t happening faster.
The American people made 100% sure in 2024 that the Dems wouldn’t have any power to defend the country.
14
histprofdaveMar 23, 2026
When the rule book has already been torn up, continuing to believe the rules still exist is a form of self delusion.
0
OhItsBeenBroughtenMar 23, 2026
+17
I think that says more about your lack of civics knowledge, but go off.
Can’t help but notice you didn’t answer the question.
17
DjinnwrathMar 23, 2026
-17
They didn't answer the question because it was asked in bad faith, as was just described to you.
-17
dragonmp93Mar 23, 2026
+17
What bad faith ?
These arguments are just as predictable, "*Why the democrats are never as authoritarian as the GOP ?*".
17
OhItsBeenBroughtenMar 23, 2026
+17
No it wasn’t. I genuinely want to know what these knuckleheads think can be legally done that isn’t being done. You can feel free to answer too.
17
Stonegrown12Mar 23, 2026
+2
I mostly agree with you besides the fact that Sinema and Fetterfuc weren't even in the Senate the last time Democrats held a simple majority. Manchin didn't start his ratfucking until after that majority was lost
2
spazturtleMar 24, 2026
-17
They could try presenting better candidates in elections than the other party does.
-17
OhItsBeenBroughtenMar 24, 2026
+16
They did, and if you say otherwise you’re just telling on yourself.
16
processedwhaleoilsMar 24, 2026
+14
Dude harris was fine candidate. I echo what another commentator said, if you found enough problems with her to *not* vote for her, that says a lot more about *you*.
14
designking4248Mar 23, 2026
+22
Murc’s Law is a term used in American political discourse to describe the widespread assumption that only Democrats have agency, accountability, or causal influence over political outcomes.
It describes a perceived media and political standard where Democrats are held responsible for legislative failures or political setbacks, regardless of the surrounding context, such as obstruction from the opposition, while Republican obstruction or extremism is treated as a given or a natural phenomenon.
22
[deleted]Mar 24, 2026
-4
[removed]
-4
processedwhaleoilsMar 24, 2026
+6
Dude we all know you're full of shit.
6
Dallywack3rMar 23, 2026
+59
Even when it’s objectively Republicans’ fault, folks would still rather be mad at Democrats.
59
thatoneguy889Mar 23, 2026
+42
That's pretty much how it goes anytime the Republican gain power. Dems simultaneously have zero power while being the only party with agency.
42
Lycaon1765Mar 23, 2026
+4
To be fair though, the Dems are still very much allergic to success. If you read the interviews and investigative articles about the campaigns you'll see how complacent they were for like all three of the previous elections, but most especially the last 2. Instead of getting new people who do the work and do it right, they kept old staffers that were super cliquey and comfortable and ineffective just because they've been around a while.
They constantly just sit around and give up and just let the reps run roughshot without any attempts at opposition in any sense because they basically treat it as the GOP has some "mandate" by the people because they won. As well as constantly giving them wins and giving them inches and then miles in hopes they change, even though the last like 60 years have shown that's literally never going to happen. There's actually a bit of a divide in the party internally where many state politicians are asking the national party to be more aggressive against the GOP but chuck is like "no we're fine, we'll just keep doing the same thing, it's bound to work this time".
They have like 0 social media presence, meanwhile that's where everyone is right now, that's how the Republicans are winning. Musk literally bought Twitter and turned it into a propaganda and misinformation mill and somehow the Dems still don't have shit to speak for besides cory booker cooking videos and think that's perfectly acceptable. Like, you'd expect the profession known for being manipulating the public, taking tragedies and twisting them, and pretending to care about issues by giving super dramatic reactions, would idk be loud and angry? Spectacle and political theater are literally the things everyone expects of politicians and yet even when we want that, the Dems still fail. This is a culture war, this is a meme war (yes, cringe, but true), this is an information war, a propaganda war, and the Democrats are losing BADLY. We don't live in an age of reason, we're in and age of spectacle. The Democrats need to realize that when you're playing chess and the other guy just start punching you and the audience is cheering it on and the judges are in on it, that trying to still win by playing chess and calling for the judges to do something about an illegal move should be the least of your worries because you just aren't playing chess anymore. You're in a brawl.
The Dems need to start using every dirty tactic the right does. If the other guy is cheating you can't win by playing fair. El que no tranza no avanza.
4
DottsteriskMar 24, 2026
+11
Almost none of that is true. It’s all defeatist talking points with zero substance.
> If you read the interviews and investigative articles about the campaigns you'll see how complacent they were for like all three of the previous elections, but most especially the last 2.
What interviews and investigative articles? What does complacent actually mean in this case?
> Instead of getting new people who do the work and do it right, they kept old staffers that were super cliquey and comfortable and ineffective just because they've been around a while.
Source? They used their experienced teams *and* they hired tons of new people.
> They constantly just sit around and give up and just let the reps run roughshot without any attempts at opposition in any sense because they basically treat it as the GOP has some "mandate" by the people because they won.
Not true at all. But the Dems can’t stop the GOP from using their majorities in Congress. The voters simply did not give them the power to do that.
> As well as constantly giving them wins and giving them inches and then miles in hopes they change, even though the last like 60 years have shown that's literally never going to happen.
Still no actual examples or evidence, just empty rhetoric.
> There's actually a bit of a divide in the party internally where many state politicians are asking the national party to be more aggressive against the GOP but chuck is like "no we're fine, we'll just keep doing the same thing, it's bound to work this time".
Schumer has never endorsed Trump’s status quo and has been loudly against the War in Iran.
> They have like 0 social media presence,
Also not true.
> Musk literally bought Twitter and turned it into a propaganda and misinformation mill and somehow the Dems still don't have shit to speak for besides cory booker cooking videos and think that's perfectly acceptable.
Take that up with the Democratic Musk, which would be Bill Gates or some shit. The Dems don’t have Elon Musk money.
And that shouldn’t be surprising, considering Musk is the richest person in the world.
> Like, you'd expect the profession known for being manipulating the public, taking tragedies and twisting them, and pretending to care about issues by giving super dramatic reactions, would idk be loud and angry? Spectacle and political theater are literally the things everyone expects of politicians and yet even when we want that, the Dems still fail.
I don’t particularly want the Dems to be liars and manipulators or to twist tragedies or only pretend to care about issues.
And when the Dems do stand up and say something dramatic, y’all condemn them for grandstanding instead of doing something concrete. They can’t win. There’s a narrative set either way.
> This is a culture war, this is a meme war (yes, cringe, but true), this is an information war, a propaganda war, and the Democrats are losing BADLY. We don't live in an age of reason, we're in and age of spectacle. The Democrats need to realize that when you're playing chess and the other guy just start punching you and the audience is cheering it on and the judges are in on it, that trying to still win by playing chess and calling for the judges to do something about an illegal move should be the least of your worries because you just aren't playing chess anymore. You're in a brawl.
This applies more to *us* than the elected Dems. Republicans aren’t winning the culture war because their elected officials are churning out content for the culture war. They’re not the drivers of that wave; they’re just riding it.
So I’m not sure why you expect our elected Dems to suddenly buy or build a giant content mill for the culture war.
If anything, that’s something *we* should be doing, building a cultural narrative that our elected officials can ride, while Dems in Congress do the legislative functions they were actually elected to do.
11
TechNaWolfMar 24, 2026
+4
The judge(s) has been systematically bought by the guy punching to be allowed Todo that and the moment you stop playing chess you're immediately DQ for not doing so. This has been going on for the better part of a decade. Not sure why you think they can just act wild as if social media presence matters when our government is currently in rules for thee not me mode.
4
lazertittiesrradMar 24, 2026
-5
You literally just made his point for him and gave us all a live demonstration of exactly what he's talking about.
What the hell is wrong with you people? You're going to wind up still crying about how unfair it all is while they throw you into a labour camp.
How can you not see this? It's literally insane. You're all in a fight for your lives and you're still trying to quote rules, to the people in power, who couldn't care less.
It's Darwinian.
You need to fight with everything you have. Every dirty trick you can think of. Because, if you don't, you will not be one of the ones to survive this.
And you will drag others down with you. This isn't a f****** debate club. Wake the f*** up and fight!
-5
TechNaWolfMar 24, 2026
+5
Crying? I only see you doing that. If you wanna fight by storming the capital then go ahead because that's the only "dirty trick" that's gonna work lying to constituents and making fake boogie mans just to drive people to elect Trump but blue or green is how we just get the same trump and maga party we have now. Imma just make sure my voter registration is valid(it is) and continue to try and vote in my local and national elections. I also try my best to influence my friends and family Todo the same. Not doing so is giving up. Me pointing out a fucked situation isn't giving up and idk how you came to that dumb f*** of a conclusion with your ramblings.
5
lazertittiesrradMar 24, 2026
-1
There are more ways to fight than just using yourself as part of a meat wave.
You're obviously too lazy, cowardly and stupid to be bothered though.
You are exactly the reason these people are in power. You deserve everything they're doing to you. Enjoy the fruits of your uselessness.
-1
TechNaWolfMar 24, 2026
+2
Tell me the oh so great "lazertittiesrrad" what should I be doing other than staying informed about the current political environment, voting accordingly, encouraging those around me Todo the same.
Please explain this great master plan for political success you have discovered.
2
Inform-AllMar 23, 2026
-2
Yeah. Some of the people sitting out are only out because the behaviors you mention from Dems give the illusion of complacency. People are looking for action, not complacency.
The old way of politics is gone and Dems need to stop clinging to it if they want to attract and mobilize voters. I’ve heard multiple people say they think Dems will be ineffective at punishing the GOP, even with a majority.
Some people are starting to think it’s essentially a one party system. Why shouldn’t they think that way when one party is allowed wanton freedom and the other party doesn’t impede or improve on the damages?
-2
DottsteriskMar 24, 2026
+3
Geez. I wonder how people could be getting the mistaken impression that Dems are complacent and “both sides are the same.”
It can’t be that people online keep repeating it as fact.
3
ToumaKazusa1Mar 24, 2026
+1
[This](https://www.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/s/qj1IY7in93) is a pretty good summary of how reddit analyzes politics. And it's not even new this is 5 years old (pretty sure this is the original version)
1
gosukhaosMar 23, 2026
+11
It's not like they could really do anything, comes with being the opposition party
11
fupa16Mar 23, 2026
+13
Weird argument to make since it implies Reps are not toothless, yet their population is just as old.
13
Lycaon1765Mar 23, 2026
+1
Reps aren't toothless, they WANT the bad things to happen, so they don't stop them. It's intentional.
1
Historical-Edge-9332Mar 23, 2026
-3
Republicans are just as toothless. They’re evil and complicit, but also fall in line with Trump’s every whim.
I’m not sure how implying Dems are toothless suggests Republicans aren’t.
-3
thatoneguy889Mar 23, 2026
+9
Please explain what the Dems can do. If you criticize their lack of action without knowing what action actually *can* be taken, then your criticism is nothing more than empty posturing.
9
Lycaon1765Mar 23, 2026
-11
Gerrymandering, filibustering, just obstruction in general. Obstruct obstruct obstruct. Stop the Republicans from being able to do anything, hijack their processes, hijack their machine. Act like the opposition party they're supposed to be. The Republicans cheat literally all the time, the Dems should start cheating too.
-11
thatoneguy889Mar 23, 2026
+14
> Gerrymandering
They're already doing this where they can (e.g. California and Virginia, New York in the future, etc). And just FYI, if it turns into a gerrymandering war, Dems will lose that simply because the GOP has trifecta control of more state governments.
>filibustering
They already do this (notice how the SAVE Act has been languishing in the senate with no realistic path forward for the last six weeks?).
> just obstruction in general
What does this entail? Filibustering is already a form of obstruction. There's only so much they can do stop stuff at the committee level because they are the minority on every committee, so they can just be outvoted. At best, they can slow it down, but they can't outright stop it.
14
TechNaWolfMar 24, 2026
+5
I think people just want the Dems to ignore laws and procedures like Republicans without realizing that the Republicans can do that because they're the majority party everywhere it matters.
5
DottsteriskMar 24, 2026
+2
Plus, just as you don’t solve a hostage situation by running in guns blazing and shooting up innocents and criminals alike, you don’t save the rule of law by destroying it.
Villains almost always have the advantage of not having to care about collateral damage. It’s not fair but it’s life.
2
Oddball-Mar 23, 2026
+93
Makes ZERO sense to have sanctions on other items and aspects of foreign items. But then totally allow something like this, which will be in affect for decades to come. Consuming media is going no where and only getting more popular, so letting foreign investment in, is a major mistake.
93
7tenthsMar 23, 2026
+27
Makes a lot of sense. These ones bribed the right people.
A little Trump coine goes a long way. Thanks republicans!
27
Oneguysenpai3Mar 23, 2026
+14
US Government (and also UK) injecting palantir into its sensitive systems , and "senators" silent . hmm
14
colemon1991Mar 23, 2026
+8
Did they not learn from Tolkien!? There's a reason why palantirs were avoided.
8
gosukhaosMar 23, 2026
+2
Yeah but we're talking about the same administration that just removes sanctions on a country they're actively bombing
2
Nasty_GoblinMar 23, 2026
+1
Kushner was paid a lot of money by the Saudis, so that’s why it’s happening.
Don’t apply reason to endless grift.
1
nuckfoahMar 23, 2026
+24
Brendan Carr won’t do a damn thing, he’s on his knees 24/7
24
NinetiesNoughtiesMar 23, 2026
+25
I have no idea how anyone can back this deal with a lot of the money coming from middle eastern investors. Why tf would you want them to have a hand in our entertainment industry in any capacity?
25
JillierHaroldLamaarMar 24, 2026
+10
OP is only a one year-old account with 600,000 post karma, hidden history, and is posting political articles on a movie board. I believe this is a bot.
10
ChampinessMar 23, 2026
+2
If stirring up a panic over foreign investors can make all that nonsense with TikTok happen then I think we deserve this as recompense
2
shadowdra126Mar 23, 2026
+2
Carr will get right on that. /s
2
ComfortableCare8897Mar 23, 2026
+1
will the senators prevent the merger?
1
lastbornjayMar 24, 2026
+1
What’s the point of sending this letter, the administration doesn’t listen to anybody except the pedophile in chief
1
CriesAboutSkinsInCODMar 23, 2026
+1
Gonna be one of those "They have investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing. Case closed".
.... or just do whatever the f*** Agent Orange wants them to do.
1
S2r5nMar 24, 2026
+1
Yet they also support sanctions against Georgia for not wanting foreign-funded influence in their country. F*** these hypocrites.
1
Mother_Airline_6276Mar 23, 2026
-1
Great. It’s a monopoly. But if China and the Middle East oil daddies are share holders in this, which country’s state media are we going to get?
-1
dmisfit21Mar 23, 2026
They can demand all they want but we all know ain’t shit going to happen.
0
BitingArtistMar 23, 2026
Law and order in the US is dead. Don't expect these things anymore. These agencies work for corporations now.
0
PokeMeRunningMar 23, 2026
The FCC might look at it. This FCC will be fine with whatever triggers the Libs
0
Rick-burp-SanchezMar 24, 2026
We still have an Opposition Party?
0
ElasticPlatypusMar 23, 2026
-21
“See? We asked for them to review themselves. We did something” - Democratic senators
-21
PuronaMar 23, 2026
+22
The post people make when they dont understand the processes of government.
22
OhItsBeenBroughtenMar 23, 2026
+2
If you have another idea feel free to let us know. This is literally the only thing they can do. The American people made sure of that.
2
ComfortableExotic646Mar 24, 2026
-1
Ahh, so this is where Democrats draw the line on Tencent. Glad we found it, and all it took was giving Superman to some rich dbag.
-1
TutorIcy324Mar 24, 2026
-1
Is movies subreddit smart enough to realize this is how Israel fights? By blaming the other side for what they are actually doing? The Ellisons are Jewish not arab. Antifascists who don't call this behavior are just trump supporters. That's all I have to say. I'm sick of how ignorant and media illiterate movie fans have become
67 Comments