If you can't accomplish your goals in the first 30 years, I'm not sure what you'll do from years 31-36. I can't even figure out why she wants to stay other than grift or having literally nothing else to do with life. Rs have moved rightward of every line she's ever drawn and abandoned half the things she previously voted for. Her only remaining task is blocking war investigations for Trump the was she and Leiberman did for Bush
962
b_tightMar 26, 2026
+399
Her entire self worth is wrapped up in people kissing her ass because shes a senator
399
Extra-Ad5925Mar 26, 2026
+203
Not just a senator, but one who likes to pretend she can be swayed to vote across party lines (even though she rarely does). Joe Manchin was the same they f****** love the power dynamic
203
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+116
Manchin actually had more scruples than Collins. He had an open offer of a cleared primary if he switched parties but did not take it. And he took some tough votes to help Biden- I'll take him any day over Sinema, Fetterman, or Collins.
116
BiokabeMar 26, 2026
+77
Exactly.
And Manchin wasn't a weasel about his positions either. He ran on what he was, he didn't lie about what he was to get elected, and he didn't compromise on what he was.
Did I disagree wtih his positions? Yes, frequently. But at the end of the day he was the best ally we could have hoped for out of WV, and you could work with him to produce some critical legislation.
The problem with Manchin wasn't that he existed, it's that we didn't win enough to make it so that his disagreements with the rest of the Democratic party didn't sink legislation.
77
weng_bayMar 27, 2026
+1
To add on to this, Manchin was also near perfect on judge and cabinet votes, all but like 2 of his no votes on Dem appointees came in votes where the Dems could afford to lose him (or the candidate was DoA for some other reason).
1
AnonybibbsMar 26, 2026
+26
Yeah, as much as people like to shit on Manchin, he was by far the best the Democrats could hope for in West Virginia, and yeah, he seemed to have some modicum of principles as well.
26
Gamebird8Mar 26, 2026
+20
The main thing about Manchin is he was for the most part the only Moderate Dem who was/could win in West Virginia (at least up till 2024, where who knows if he actually could have defended his seat) and that was the concession we were willing to work with.
Sinema and Fetterman quite literally could have been replaced much much sooner if the voters had the conscience to do so. It wasn't a matter of necessity we kept them if office, but rather a issue of laziness
20
BiokabeMar 26, 2026
+32
> Sinema and Fetterman quite literally could have been replaced much much sooner if the voters had the conscience to do so. It wasn't a matter of necessity we kept them if office, but rather a issue of laziness
I'm not sure exactly what you're on here.
Sinema ran as a progressive. She lied about who she was, only to morph into something else as soon as she had the office. She was a one-term Senator who was voted out as soon as it was possible to do so. There is literally nothing that her constituents could have done to get her out of office earlier than what happened in reality.
Same with Fetterman. He ran as a progressive, won as a progressive, had a stroke and became a different person after winning election. The Senator PA got is not what was advertised, and they are now stuck with him until he is up for election again. As with Sinema, there is literally nothing that the voters can do to dump him before his term is up.
32
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+14
In the end Sinema did not even run again. She switched to independent then bailed on that when numbers showed Gallego was going to hold onto the vast majority of D voters and she wasn't doing as strong with the middle and Rs as she assumed. I still don't understand her Green party to progressive but pragmatic to obstructionist Senator to MAGA aligned lobbyist arc. The only shared trait was a attention seeking.
And props to Jill Biden who literally made a donation the minute Gallego announced.
14
TheSilenceMEhMar 26, 2026
+3
I always saw Sinema's political arc as a wolf in sheep clothing. Maybe she did hold those progressive beliefs but when she saw the $$$ and became friendly with all the lobbyists in D.C. she dropped them and showed her true colors.
3
MerakelMar 26, 2026
+4
The stroke might have made him worse, but Fetterman was never actually progressive. He just sounded like one.
4
firemage22Mar 27, 2026
+1
We knew he was an Israel fanboy, but it had seemed at the time he wasn't as bad as Shapiro, and he had some other redeeming traits, but post stroke all the good stuff vanished
1
m0nk_3y_gwMar 27, 2026
+1
> She lied about who she was, only to morph into something else as soon as she had the office.
She was originally elected (to State offices) as a progressive in 2003, while dissing Joe Lieberman as a turncoat. So she had a long track record to make think people she wouldn't flip like that.
1
AdulteryMar 26, 2026
+13
It must make her feel so important.
13
PipXXXMar 26, 2026
+13
I f****** hate the mercenary senators. Goddamn lieberman f****** over the public option
Also why it still pisses me off when people say Obama had a supermajority, he never did. Joe and another part of the caucus was a merc senator, and it took forever to seat al franken
13
mongster03_Mar 26, 2026
+3
Also Kennedy died
3
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+4
I think Kennedy was already basically on leave & only showing up for major votes by the summer when Franken was finally certified. The supermajority lasted something like 100 days. But online you would think Obama had it for six years and just didn't use it.
ETA- Robert Byrd was also at death's door. We've really screwed ourselves with the ancient pols over the last 20 years when you add in Feinstein who was healthier but much less mentally acute than those 2.
4
mongster03_Mar 26, 2026
+4
And during those 100 days, they passed Obamacare
4
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+6
Yep- and Pelosi had to make her caucus swallow hard & accept the Senate version because they anything new/revised could not make it to 60 voted in the House.
6
BleachedUnicornBHoleMar 26, 2026
+5
There’s more value in being the 51st vote than the 52nd. Like you pointed out, the “will they, won’t they” thing only happened when the vote was close.
5
ForsakenRelief309Mar 26, 2026
+17
Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski drink DumbBitchJuice and I’ll die on that hill.
17
Cum__CookieMar 26, 2026
+3
I mean, if you have no morals and only care about money and some amount of power, it's a pretty cushy sounding job.
3
mrroofuisMar 26, 2026
+2
She will take your advice into consideration...
2
RobutNotRobotMar 26, 2026
+1
If she was smart, she would've announced her retirement last year.
Instead she'll go out a loser that has enabled Trump every time it mattered.
1
TheDarkHelmet1985Mar 26, 2026
+1
Isn’t that most of them though these days?
1
PlayBey0nd87Mar 26, 2026
+18
Power.
18
CrustyTh3PunkMar 26, 2026
+11
They all hate their families and know that the only thing keeping them from being put into a home is having a very important job still.
11
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+4
She has a late in life (wink, nudge) marriage and no kids.
4
scottfaracasMar 26, 2026
+11
She abandoned her principals after she ran for a third time. Her entire schtick was term limits for Congress. The irony now…
11
Cannoneer1974Mar 27, 2026
+1
Olympia Snowe (sp) kept Susan Collins in line before she left the senate. John McCain did the same for Graham.
1
Tmerrill0Mar 26, 2026
+18
From a different perspective, she has accomplished a lot. She has been able to walk the fence of appearing moderate while falling in line with her party whenever it counts. And her constituents keep reelecting her because they believe she is a moderate. It is impressive, but not in a good way.
18
cobrachickenwingMar 27, 2026
+3
And she did literally nothing but make life worse for her constituents. That will be the legacy all these Republican senators have in their obituary.
3
togetherwem0m0Mar 26, 2026
+10
Its usually attributable to the dozens of people built up around an elected person as to why they want to stay. Each elected office is actually a small business that's sticky becsuse so many people depend on it for their nut.
10
wheatgivesmeshitsMar 26, 2026
+4
People using nut to mean ~~pay~~ livelihood will never not be hilarious to me. My whole life its been a sexual innuendo and it's hard not to read it that way.
Edit: changing a word to make it more clear
4
togetherwem0m0Mar 26, 2026
+1
I totally agree but it's a really good and meaningful word. We all have unavoidable daily living expenses and those drive the incentives that every person uses when making decisions about their employment.
Theres no other word for it, lol
1
wheatgivesmeshitsMar 26, 2026
+2
What? Lol
Livelihood. It's just another word for livelihood.
2
PolicyNonkMar 26, 2026
+4
She campaigned, initially, on serving two terms maximum. That was 30 years ago in 1996.
4
ZomunieoMar 26, 2026
+2
A lot of Rs have probably rigged their local elections, especially in long time red states that use ES&S machines (easily hacked and leave no paper trail).
2
WEEGEMANMar 26, 2026
+1
Fragility. Can’t let go afraid that the person who replaces her actually shows she didn’t give a shit
1
DanimalMKEMar 26, 2026
+1
These Senators and representatives need other hobbies. I can't imagine working into my seventies, much less into my eighties!
1
dragunityagMar 26, 2026
+1
You'd work in your 80s if you only had to go into the office once a week, got paid 175k + grift and world class healthcare.
1
SynekalMar 26, 2026
+1
And don’t forget, her husband makes millions on insider trading!
Power and money are incredible motivators for the lead-poisoned elderly elite.
1
edelweiss_pirates_noMar 26, 2026
+1
Now I gotta go buy another bottle of wine to celebrate when she is ousted.
And I gotta hope Plattner isn't going to Fetterman us.
1
KwelikinzMar 26, 2026
+359
“I think he’s learned his lesson ….” Get that incompetent, decrepit, sorry ass out of government.
359
NickCostanzaMar 26, 2026
+82
Sticking by Kavanaugh burns me forever
82
BrownSugarBareMar 26, 2026
+45
How is she still in her seat at all? She's a nitwit
45
Jesuismieux412Mar 26, 2026
+17
She probably wages the culture war in ME. “I know you haven’t seen a wage increase in ten years, your healthcare is unaffordable, and your bridges are due to collapse. I won’t do anything to change that. However, I’ll ensure 3 trans kids won’t be able to play high school ball.” Millions cheer and cast their votes. Idiocracy.
17
Scared-Arrival3885Mar 26, 2026
+6
Surprisingly not! Culture war stuff is not as popular in Maine as the south or Midwest.
There’s already a lot of generic attack ads running against Collins calling her out for raising healthcare prices.
She has responded by running her own ad which touts the fact she voted for a bill that would provide better healthcare for firefighters and other first responders who get injured on the job. The ad goes on to ask you to call senator collins to “thank her.”
6
garbage-bargeMar 26, 2026
+4
Cranium so large it looks like she’s wearing a space helmet and not a damn thing inside it.
4
-youvegotredonyou-Mar 27, 2026
+2
“That bird flew right into your head. Like it couldn’t avoid it. Never seen that before. A bird flyin into a woman’s head.”
2
phonomancerMar 26, 2026
+2
Even worse was the followup "well, it's really more aspirational."
2
relevantelephant00Mar 26, 2026
+3
Just like Kentucky and Texas always do, I have a feeling Maine will disappoint again. Republicans always fall in line.
3
HrekiresMar 26, 2026
+202
Fingers crossed but after the [2020 Maine polling miss](https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/senate/general/2020/maine/collins-vs-gideon), I'm not sure I'll ever believe another poll coming out of the state.
202
RegularLeading5200Mar 26, 2026
+75
Definitely a huge miss in the polling, but I think it's also important to look at the actual results. Collins went from 68.5% in 2014 to 51% in 2020. The 8+ point victory is a bit deceptive, too, as Maine has RCV and a more left-wing candidate got 5%, which mostly would've gone to Gideon had Collins not hit 50%. It was also the first time in a reelection bid that Collins ever lost a single county, losing 2 in 2020. And that was against your most generic, moderate Democratic candidate that had the personality of a wet paper bag.
Now I'm not saying that the polls will 100% be accurate this year, but given that this is currently shaping up to be a D+8 or so year, if not more, the electorate is going to be much more Democratic-friendly than 2020.
75
doyouevenIiftMar 26, 2026
+48
2020 also had trump on the ballot, and republicans consistently underperform when he’s not on it
48
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+18
People forget Trump took one of the Miane congressional districts that year.
18
PhysicalConsistencyMar 27, 2026
+1
Even with all that, Gideon still would have lost. Sure, the trends are there, but it doesn't address the underlying polling being unreliable.
1
Ralphwiggum911Mar 26, 2026
+14
Honestly, any polling. There are more silent "always R" than we care to admit.
14
TimeformayoMar 26, 2026
+11
I think you mean "hard R" voters.
11
Just2_Stare_at_StarsMar 27, 2026
+2
Brilliant.
2
starkraverMar 26, 2026
+3
Don't "believe polls." Critically review them to observe trends.
3
TomotronicsMar 26, 2026
+12
Look up Gideon and her husband. A big difference to a harbor master ex-vet. Gideon’s only redeeming quality was that she wasn’t Collins. She would have been another corporate Dem accepting big donations from lobbyists. Don’t get me wrong, it would have been better than Collins, but Gideon wouldn’t have championed any real change the last 6 years.
12
putsch80Mar 26, 2026
+4
Yup. We’ve seen this movie before.
4
mosswickMar 26, 2026
+8
Just once. 2020 was the only competitive re-election of her career. Not to mention you compare her victory margin to 2014...
2014 - R+37
2020 - R+6
Consider other factors as well. Harris won Maine by 7 points, and Collins has consistently negative approvals for the first time in her career.
8
nola_fanMar 26, 2026
+4
And Collins hasn't actually started campaigning
4
Big_Dick_NRGMar 26, 2026
+3
What's she gonna campaign on? That she didn't suck Trump's chode as much as other GOP sycophant slugs?
3
nola_fanMar 26, 2026
+3
Probably that she's the most senior Republican on the budget committee and responsible for sending billions of dollars in federal funds to the state. Oh, and the misogyny and Nazi tattoo stuff as well, assuming Platner is the Dem nominee which seems likely now. There also might be more opposition research about him that isn't public yet.
Like, I'm not a fan of her and want her to lose, but it's important to be realistic about the situation. A 7 point lead against an opponent who hasn't tried yet and has, in her last election, outran both in-state polling and national trends, isn't something to be super confident about.
Now, the national trend might be even harder to fight against this time, and she's less popular than she's ever been, so those are great signs for Democrats. But this will almost certainly be a tough race.
3
BigBoyYuyuhMar 27, 2026
+1
I no longer believe polls at all.
1
reddittorbrigadeMar 26, 2026
+49
Can't believe she has stayed that long in power. My dog is more courageous than her.
49
recentgroovesMar 26, 2026
+22
She’s got to go and take her concern with her
22
LightBeerOnIceMar 26, 2026
+15
It's time, long past time for the geriatric Senators and congress people to hit the road jack!
Go sit on a beach ffs.
15
mokee92Mar 26, 2026
+30
Coolins is very concerned
30
babybirdingURgrandmaMar 26, 2026
+16
>The survey, conducted by Emerson College Polling between March 21 and 23, revealed that Democrats Graham Platner and Governor Janet Mills are both ahead of Collins.
Ugh, Janet Mills is 78. Can we not do 78 year olds please?
16
MerakelMar 26, 2026
+5
Insanity that she's already in power and needs more at that age.
5
frosty_lizardMar 26, 2026
+12
Kick that b**** to the curb, she's done so much damage to the country already.
No idea how those people sleep at night like Sinema, Fetterman and others
12
Fweezel13Mar 26, 2026
+4
On a bed full of cash
4
lynch527Mar 26, 2026
+5
Susan Collins: Concern levels are rising.
5
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+39
Platner is a flawed candidate. But I do think there is a strong desire for non-politicians brewing in many parts of the US and he is quite recognizable, in good and bad ways, to Mainers. Collins is 73, Mills is 79, and people want to turn the page. It's a fascinating race, quite representative of the unique dynamics of Maine, but it's a Senate seat the Democrats can get. The biggest factor honestly will be whether Platner can stop with the self-inflicted wounds.
39
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+7
Not necessarily sold on him... but if he is the vessel to send Collins into retirement, I will embrace the suck. Even one less R senator would have sunk a couple of Trump appointees and 2 less R senators would have given us and entirely different cabinet. Margins matter.
7
AutomationBiasMar 26, 2026
+17
Platner isn't the only candidate in the primary! [Andrea LaFlamme](https://www.andreaformaine.com/) is a 37 year old public health professor who has none of Platner's baggage.
17
RimboTheRebbiterMar 26, 2026
+9
I suppose anything is possible in the primary, but at this point it seems like the realistic likely candidates have been settled upon.
However! Maine does have ranked choice voting, so it's always an option for people to rank LaFlamme and Platner on their ballot as well. There could always be a surprise result.
9
noncongruentMar 26, 2026
+4
She sadly has none of his campaign's money and curb appeal. Her main claim to fame was being arrested for chalking Collins' sidewalk back in 2022. Her chances of making it to the ballot, much less to office, is for all intents and purposes zero. Hopefully she doesn't end up being the spoiler that assures Collins' victory over Platner.
4
Silent-StormsMar 26, 2026
+10
Both candidates here are flawed. It's unfortunate.
10
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+15
I'd argue all three are. Collins is unpopular, walks that uncomfortable centrism where she appears to have no stake in the game, and that makes her unliked by MAGA and Democrats. Mills has been an effective governor, but she's 79 and was courted into this race by Schumer because the Democratic establishment is as afraid of leftists as they are of MAGA. And Platner seems to shoot himself in the foot a great deal and somehow that's always related to being Nazi adjacent.
But one of this is authentic. One of them is a non-politician. One of them is younger. One of them i rather, well, Maine. Seems like the race is Platner's to win or lose, and if he can develop a bit of political discipline, the Senate seat could be his.
15
Silent-StormsMar 26, 2026
+8
For sure, but I was just talking about the primary.
I think she was recruited because of her electoral record, not because of a conspiracy against leftists.
Yea, he definitely breaks the mold, but historically that doesn't end well.
8
Ok-Firefighter5006Mar 26, 2026
+4
One authentically uses the f sur and makes racist comments about black people, is that the authenticity you mean?
4
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+10
Yes. Have you spent much time in Maine?!
10
Ok-Firefighter5006Mar 26, 2026
+1
Oh I have.
And you want the worst part of the state to represent you?
1
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+3
I'm just suggesting that in Maine, like most other states, have a fair number of people who might speak, authentically, in such a manner, especially on forums like Reddit.
3
Ok-Firefighter5006Mar 26, 2026
+3
And it being “authentic” does not excuse bigotry lol
3
Any_Will_86Mar 26, 2026
+1
Schumer's love of Representatives and Governors is not really about blocking leftists. They are generally safer candidates who have already been vetted in big races so do not run the risk of scandal. Think NC Senate race 2020 which Tillis would have lost if the Dem nominee were not caught in a testing scandal and a dope about neither handling it well or stepping aside. I usually rag on Schumer but I understand the thinking on that.
1
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+5
Sure it does. It supports the status quo in the party, centralizes power, promotes centrism as the dominant approach and seeks to dissuade anyone challenging these dynamics from running.
5
goteamnickMar 27, 2026
+1
Susan Collins has won against the odds for years and years, so Schumer is going for a proven w*****.
1
Better-Community-187Mar 26, 2026
-2
I have a genuine fear that platner is a plant from the alt right and will join fetterman in being a wall against progress that may take years to remove.
-2
NovacaneReignMar 26, 2026
+8
There’s honestly just no reason to do that anymore. You can just be an open Nazi if you run as a Republican. Anyone genuinely holding these beliefs wouldn’t neuter themselves by having to work within the Democratic Party which is less effective generally than republicans (in terms of leading to extreme outcomes). Fetterman just genuinely has brain damage.
8
UngodlyPainMar 26, 2026
+1
I feel like they'd choose the ideal plant candidate wouldn't be someone with such a bad past that would be hurdles on the way to getting the plant elected in the first place.
1
YouareposthumanMar 26, 2026
+1
Fetterman’s at 91% lock step voting along party lines. It sucks that there are some critical issues in that 9% that he’s defected on, but I really do think it’s damaging how the rhetoric around him is about his brain damage or being some kind of plant. He’s a reliable Democratic Party vote more than 9 out of 10 times and that’s objective and provable.
1
Better-Community-187Mar 26, 2026
+8
That stats meaningless. You can't boil down the multistep, highly complicated, and nuanced legislative system to a single "votes with statistic". It doesn't capture anything that happens in private offices, it doesn't capture the leadership or whips calculating what they believe can pass, it doesn't capture riders that cause a legislator to vote one way or another, it doesn't capture their public statements that could potentially kill legislation, it doesn't capture fillibuster, the list goes on and on. Frankly, and i dont mean this as a personal attack against you, but that statistic (for any member of congress) exists solely for bad faith actors to convince you that having senators that sink a president's term or a house member that's pro life are good for the democratic party.
8
YouareposthumanMar 26, 2026
+3
Honestly those are all valid and well articulated points.
But I guess I’m confused on how you’re willing to apply so much nuance and context to the stats I highlighted, but also still in the “Platner’s a secret Nazi” camp. Like why no nuance or context for him?
3
Better-Community-187Mar 26, 2026
+3
That is a very valid point that I honestly have no response to. I guess the tattoo thing just makes me a bit nervous.
3
YouareposthumanMar 26, 2026
+2
You and me both dude. This is uncharted territory and I’m choosing to approach it as an optimist with preparations to be disappointed. Here’s hoping we’re all pleasantly surprised by what happens in November 🤷🏻♂️
2
UngodlyPainMar 26, 2026
+2
These stats are always BS, because of backroom votes and deals. Like Pelosi, McConnell, Schumer, etc have all said they have discussions before hand, and if they don't think they have everyone's votes for something? They just don't even waste the time bringing it to a vote. Which distorts the outcomes. Like the BBB? They made like 5 or 6 different versions of it, ranging from 4T down to 1.7T... but only brought it to a vote once. Manchin said no? But then throw in say 9 judge appointments? And suddenly "Manchin votes with Dems 90% of the time 100% of the time when it comes to judges" ... Except like there's probably 10 judges he said no to, in back room conversations, and the like 4 versions of the BBB he said no to before they went to the floor? And the actual reality would be "Manchin votes with the Dems like half the time on judges, and like a small fraction of the time on bigger policies.
2
micro102Mar 27, 2026
+1
"They voted together 99 times on changing post office names, and differed only on nuking the world. That's a 99% shared voting record! They must be have similar ideology and morals."
1
goteamnickMar 27, 2026
+1
He was the deciding vote on making Markwayne Mullin DHS Secretary.
1
YellowCardManKyleMar 26, 2026
+1
People are flawed.
1
echofinderMar 26, 2026
+11
Any non-politician is going to have 'self-inflicted wounds'. That's the whole difference; real people aren't perfect - they're messy, unscripted, and unfiltered. That honestly is one of the biggest clues for politicians - when they stop saying anything that could possibly damage them, you know they've sold out.
11
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+23
But when you're asking for people's votes for a Senate seat, it's time to show a bit of discipline. Showing up on a conspiracy driven antisemitic podcast, saying you're a fan, come on?! That's not messy, unscripted or unfiltered. That's problematic and an easy fix.
23
veggiesamaMar 26, 2026
+2
Meh, the whole "don't platform people we don't like" movement really wasn't effective. 2026 Wokeristas need to remember that Gen X has generational brainrot due to the X-Files, talk radio, and lead exposure. You need to talk to people where they're at, even if it personally disgusts and offends you.
And where a bunch of people are at right now are in right-wing echo chambers, from Joe Rogan to YouTube conspiracy shows. If you can make an effective showing in those places (and I don't honestly know if Platner did), then you will cut through the noise with your messages. The hyper-manicured Democrat that sticks to the party messaging isn't going to succeed. They need to get dirty and play with the pigs sometimes.
2
WogleyMar 26, 2026
+1
Seems like "conspiracy driven antisemitic podcast" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here; to the point that I think you are being intentionally deceptive. The podcast you vague referenced is
Valhalla VFT. Its hosted by a former service member, which is probably why Graham is a fan.
From what I can gather, the channel is current events; clearly antiwar and anti Trump. It has some "conspiracies", but no more than you see on r/politics or other left wing coded media. It criticizes Israel - which is not antisemitic (Israel =/= Jews).
I didnt watch all Vahallas videos, maybe I missed something, but from what I see your post is six degrees of scandal purity test bs, which is far grosser than Graham going on a military coded podcast.
1
Justin_123456Mar 26, 2026
+5
Honestly, would any normal person be able to defend everything they’ve posted online, every Reddit post, every Tweet, every YouTube comment, every bad joke, or Borat impression, since you were a kid?
I certainly couldn’t. And anyone who could is either very weird or very old.
5
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+8
You don't have to "defend" everything you've ever wrote. If you're running for office, you do have to be able to place it in context, talk about how you or your views have changed, and accept with humility that it may be part of how you're viewed. Platner has done this, somewhat effectively, but then he shows up on some conspiracy driven antisemitic podcast and rips the scab off the wound. It's a lack of political discipline.
8
Hades_MercedesMar 26, 2026
+12
Probably not but I'm not a self-proclaimed 'military history buff' that up until a few months ago, spent the last 15 years walking around with a goddamned Totenkopf "accidentally" tattooed on my chest either.
12
Ok-Firefighter5006Mar 26, 2026
+5
I mean I’ve never called someone the f slur or said racist stuff about black people so it’s probably easier for me to prove that then him
5
Post_office_clerk01Mar 26, 2026
+2
Most people don’t have racially charged histories and most people don’t have Nazi tattoos. Dude is a dumpster fire waiting to happen. But Collins is literal human waste so idk what to do.
2
SASSIESASSQUATCHMar 26, 2026
+2
I help protect myself from r*** by not electing people with the view that I was raped for something I did or wore. He does not and will not have my vote, I’ll be skipping right by his race seeing as there are no worthy candidates.
2
chron67Mar 26, 2026
+2
> The biggest factor honestly will be whether Platner can stop with the self-inflicted wounds.
And also whether the Democratic machine backs him or does everything possible to oppose him.
2
Hot_Ambition_6457Mar 26, 2026
+2
Liberals love to remind you that Platner is a flawed cadidate as evidence he will not win.
Is Donald Trump a flawed candidate? Did he win?
Do you want to win? Or do you want to **avoid making change**.
Avoiding changes to maintain the status quo is called conservatism and theres a whole separate party for that.
2
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+3
It's possible to hold these two views at the same time - Platner is a flawed candidate and he can win. I, for example, am not suggesting only perfect candidates should run. As a Democratic Socialist myself, I like a good deal of his platform. I also would like him to stop shooting himself in the foot and actually take the opportunity in front of him.
3
chron67Mar 26, 2026
+5
I tend to align with you on this. I think he is very flawed but at the same time he may very well be the best left of center candidate in the race. At this point, even a flawed democratic senator helps us MUCH more than more Susan Collins.
5
EddieVanzettiMar 27, 2026
+1
He is worse than that. He is a future Sinema. Nazi tattoos, victim blaming r*** comments, and working for Blackwater in *2018* does not paint the picture of a flawed but well meaning candidate.
1
jellofishspongeMar 26, 2026
-2
What's wrong with platner? He's a great communicator
-2
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+9
Google "Platner Nazi" and I think you'll find your answer. And his media people really need to keep him away from appearances, much less praising, the Valhalla VFT podcast. Yes, he's a great communicator. But he lacks some political discipline and it results in self-inflicted wounds.
9
Ok-Firefighter5006Mar 26, 2026
+5
The homophobia and racism
5
jellofishspongeMar 26, 2026
+2
I haven't heard anything like that on the campaign trail or recently. Can you share examples?
2
Ok-Firefighter5006Mar 26, 2026
+7
Interesting that you are cabining your question to “campaign trail” or “recently”.
Is that because you know there are examples outside of that restriction?
7
vandreulvMar 26, 2026
+2
Nazi tattoo that he properly knew the name of before it was discovered that he had a nazi tattoo he claimed to not know what it actually was before rushing to have it covered up.
2
jellofishspongeMar 26, 2026
-1
Do you mean the skull and bones? Those are pretty standard. I like the pirate flag stuff, if I had a boat I would definitely fly a pirate flag.
-1
vandreulvMar 26, 2026
+6
The "skull and bones" he personally referred to as "my totenkopf", a very explicit nazi symbol. Something he had known was one for year, even saying so on Reddit.
https://florida.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/totenkopf
https://fox11online.com/news/nation-world/controversy-grows-as-platners-past-reddit-posts-suggest-awareness-of-nazi-symbol-tattoo
So yeah, wake the f*** up, bro.
6
CaballoenPeloMar 26, 2026
+6
[“it’s just a Jolly Roger!”](https://share.google/ge2srI6sFGA3uIf0U)
🤡🤡
6
ClicquotMar 26, 2026
-3
the current president is a flawed candidate. I am still so very confused about how one side embraces the flaws and only looks at the things they "like" (those things, in this case are not true and the MAGAs are misinformed) and totally ignore the "bad" stuff. While the Democrats actively seek out flaws in any and all candidates (even if there is literally one thing that bothers them) and refuse to look at the larger picture.
Non-politicians- who have not been aiming to run for public office since grade school- are folks like you and I. We dated the wrong people, we may have gotten a terrible tattoo when we were in college (spring break can be WILD, yo), we may have held beliefs that we honestly though were right before our pre-frontal cortex was fully formed and have since changed our mind (we stopped dating that terrible person, we got rid of those loser friends who said that tattoo was DOPE!).
If all anyone ever does is vote for the person they agree with 100%, it is going to be a very lonely congressional chamber (local, state and federal).
-3
SuperstitiousPigeon5Mar 26, 2026
+4
Come on, "The current president is a flawed candidate."
The Japanese art of Kintsugi is taking a broken piece of pottery and using gold to repair the flaws. Trump has a similar practice except instead of fine porcelain work, he's a shattered dollar store vase - and instead of artistically applied gold, its finger painted diarrhea from the D rated health code violating Taco Bills bathroom.
4
Romantic_PisceanMar 26, 2026
+6
The left has higher standards. It shouldn't be difficult to understand.
6
Scary_Mountain130Mar 26, 2026
The “left’s” higher standards don’t seem to include things like being opposed to consolidating corporate power, empowering the military industrial complex to engage in in endless wars, opposition to the genocidal state of Israel, etc. I’d much rather have a flawed candidate who’s focused on making life better for average Americans than another corporate stooge.
0
ClicquotMar 26, 2026
-2
try not to break your neck if you fall off that horse. It is very tall.
-2
Stillwater-Scorp1381Mar 26, 2026
+3
It would be a great thing to get her “concerned” ass out of that seat!
3
crazinessyoMar 26, 2026
+3
I'm rooting for you Susan! Break a leg... and a hip!
3
Fit_Elderberry_7236Mar 26, 2026
+5
This is proof that there is legit hunger for left leaning ideas and genuine people. The party should take note.
5
ShibasScornMar 26, 2026
+4
Get all the blue hairs out, geriatrics shouldn’t be anywhere near elected office.
4
NotJimmy97Mar 26, 2026
+2
I think she's toast. Dems put up some seriously compromised options, but with the economy and Iran I don't think it matters anymore.
2
Ham_I_rightMar 26, 2026
+2
She is very concerned he may have learned his lesson.
2
BoardwoodgamegirlMar 26, 2026
+2
Good. She's wolf in sheep's clothing
2
Stick314Mar 26, 2026
+2
Get that old broad out of there.
2
MentalDisintegrat1onMar 26, 2026
+2
Can we get age and term limits? We have people in Congress that would have been forced out of any company they are past their expiration date.
2
thereverendpuckMar 26, 2026
+2
At this point, I don’t think Collins actually has supporters. It seems far more “Not Collins ‘26l” vs “Keep it Red ‘26.”
2
ChangeIsNotTheEnemyMar 26, 2026
+2
Traitor! (Collins)
2
No-Independence-6842Mar 27, 2026
+1
Yes please! If it wasn’t for her we wouldn’t have kavannah on the Supreme Court. Clutch your pearls b**** we’re coming for you!
1
Slow_Investment_2211Mar 27, 2026
+1
I’m afraid this guy will end up being another Fetterman though.
1
Pubs01Mar 26, 2026
+6
f*** this dude. got nazi symbols and goes on nazi podcasts.
another fetterman waiting to happen
6
Motor_Somewhere7565Mar 26, 2026
+6
On principle, I turned myself off to the Platner hype after the Totenkopf tattoo controversy. I can't call Republicans fascists and nazis but overlook that. If Maine voters choose him, they choose him. It's not unusual now to observe constituents shrugging off his flaws, considering who we have as President. What can I say? Collins needs to go, and Gov Janet Mills was not the answer to that question.
6
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
+11
Dumbasses can repent.
11
husky429Mar 26, 2026
+4
He's a high ceiling, low floor candidate. Could be Sinema or could be Bernie.
4
ET2-SWMar 26, 2026
+5
Careful, Maine. PA thought Fetterman was legit, too. Maybe Platner's a good guy, and it's definitely time for Collins and Mills to move on. But sometimes you don't get what you vote for.
5
Describing_DonkeysMar 26, 2026
+10
It's worth taking a chance and trying. We can vote them out next election if we need to. We have to end the status quo, which both Mills and Collins would continue. Different aspects of it, but neither will force real change, which is desperately needed.
10
benji2007Mar 26, 2026
+2
I've met him quite a few times and once before he ever thought of running. He seems exactly as we perceive him, very down to earth authentic guy.
2
veggiesamaMar 26, 2026
+3
I still think Fetterman was legit but the stroke caused a personality shift. It's a completely different situation. Even so, I still think post-stroke Fetterman is better than MAGA sycophant and charlatan Dr. Oz.
3
Pubs01Mar 26, 2026
+9
fetterman was a pos before the stroke.
9
thirstygregoryMar 26, 2026
+2
If you have concerns about Platner, tattoo, etc, (as I did) and truly want to see what he’s about, 100% recommend listening to this.
I don’t think he’a another Fetterman.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/death-sex-money-after-two-wars-and-ptsd-he-became/id279188498?i=1000752843059
2
tjdavidsMar 26, 2026
+7
But would people habe said this about fetterman circa 2022?
7
Post_office_clerk01Mar 26, 2026
+6
I’m extremely worried about him tbh. I don’t trust him and if I was in Maine I wouldn’t vote for him. Nazi tattoo aren’t accidental I don’t care what anyone says. Either way good luck to Maine.
6
CaballoenPeloMar 26, 2026
Yeah I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. Agreed that no one accidentally gets a totenkopf tattoo, especially a self proclaimed military history buff. Im sure the photos of that tat are gonna play so well in attack ads in the general. Absolute fumble of a candidate
0
BlueDragon101Mar 26, 2026
+3
I buy the “getting it without knowing what it is” deal tbh. It’s a cool skull tattoo, if you’re in the military and getting a tattoo and don’t know that’s a nazi thing specifically…
Not covering it up sooner is the more sus part.
It’s not not a red flag but tbh I’m not sure it’s his biggest one? I’d call working for blackwater as the actual red flag here.
3
pickliftMar 27, 2026
+2
I had no idea what a totenkopf was until the platner story came out. Did you?
2
Osirus1156Mar 26, 2026
+2
Good. Get that useless dipshit out of there.
2
ReadingTheRealmsMar 26, 2026
+2
Much like Texas senate, I’ll believe this is real when he’s being sworn in.
2
ttd24Mar 26, 2026
+2
Only if the Dems don’t hand the nomination to Mills, Plattner is the one that can and will beat Collins
2
VesperMoon411Mar 26, 2026
+1
I don’t trust him. He feels like someone who will throw minorities under the bus
1
Formal57Mar 26, 2026
+5
lol like Susan Collins is much better
5
PugeHenissMar 26, 2026
+2
So just more of the same then
2
RobutNotRobotMar 26, 2026
+1
Either way, low 40s means Collins is fucked.
1
AcanthisittaNo6653Mar 26, 2026
+1
Collins put her party's interests over her constituents', like every other republican. It will soon be time to take out the trash.
1
redheadedandboldMar 27, 2026
+1
How many times can Maine voters screw themselves? Sounds like there should be a punchline to this question.
1
CitySeekerTronMar 27, 2026
+1
For her, this is cause for concern.
1
PressFforAlderaanMar 27, 2026
+1
Brows very furrowed.
1
SethmeistergMar 27, 2026
+1
Yea I've heard this before. I hope so but boy have we been let down in the past so many times.
1
Far-Wallaby-5033Mar 26, 2026
-5
by electing a nazi. thats perfect
-5
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
+2
What policies does Planter have that is concurrent with that of Nazism?
2
Pubs01Mar 26, 2026
seriously? dude has a nazi tattoo on his chest.
0
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
+4
I'd rather have him in congress than 75% of democrats. You care about optics but care not of policy. Policy is all that matters.
So go ahead and judge someone by the tattoos on their skin rather than the content of their character. If you're gonna attack him, do it on his policies.
4
kelpyb1Mar 26, 2026
+1
I agree with you that Platner isn’t a Nazi, but the idea you shouldn’t judge people by the tattoos they choose to get is ridiculous.
One’s tattoos are a reflection of the content of their character. That’s like the entire point of tattoos.
1
ski0331Mar 26, 2026
+2
What’s it say about character of I get a flash art scorpion or snoopy? Not all people view tattoos as reflections. Sometimes people just get them.
2
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
+1
Good point.
1
angrymoppetMar 26, 2026
+2
He was a young, dumb 22 year old in a tattoo shop in the balkans with his fellow marines. I genuinely believe him when he says he had no idea the history behind it. Hell, I think if you showed the totenkopf to a random selection of 100 Americans on the street or at your job 98 or 99 of them would see nothing beyond "edgy skull tat."
He got it covered up when he learned the history behind it and has publicly and forcefully disavowed any sympathy for that ideology. Unless and until there's something that comes out about him beyond a skull tattoo, I'm inclined to believe him.
2
kelpyb1Mar 26, 2026
+1
That he got covered up
1
New-Equal8039Mar 26, 2026
+1
Get. It. Done.
1
TapprunnerMar 26, 2026
+1
DNC better not f*** this up.
1
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
-7
Platner 2028
-7
vandreulvMar 26, 2026
+2
How far we we've fallen... when having a nazi tattoo for years and lying about knowing that it was one is no longer a disqualifying gaff for leftists...
2
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
-3
Who better to build a working people's coalition than a former nazi turned progressive. He liability in your eyes may be the thing that helps deprogram people on the right. Dumbasses can redeem themselves.
But, if you prefer, we can have an empty suit, AIPAC backed, platitude ridden, focus group tested, profit driven, center-right abundance candidate that democrats loooove to nominate time and time again that will inevitably lose to the biggest imbeciles in politics.
-3
vandreulvMar 26, 2026
+3
You've managed to nail exactly what this article was about.
https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2018/10/how-left-enabled-fascism
>The leader of the left, adored for his “authenticity” and destined for cult status, saw himself as a fighter for radical change. His transformed party was the biggest of its kind in Europe, and bursting with youthful vigour.
>On the other side of the political spectrum lay the far right and its sinisterly absurd demagogues, thugs and ideological lunacies. Naturally, the leader of the left regarded these people with contempt and viewed his party as the only authentic resistance to them. For strategic reasons, however, he was willing to help them achieve a key part of their dream, which he shared. The dream was to break the loathsome old liberal order. Such a break, reasoned the leader, would create conditions under which the left would sweep to power and transform the country for the better.
Leftists seem to love nothing more than removing all roadblocks for Fascists to gain absolute power. What you said in your post, it's f****** uncanny.
3
Pubs01Mar 26, 2026
+3
oh if you prefer you can have a empty suit.
get outta here with this nonsense. People have legitimate concerns and you write that?
3
Aggravating-HousingMar 26, 2026
+1
*Who better to build a working people's coalition than a former nazi turned progressive*
I have no words 😐
1
Gradstudentiquette69Mar 26, 2026
+3
Because you didn't read the next 2 sentences
3
Aggravating-HousingMar 26, 2026
+4
I did read the next two sentences, and they failed to alleviate any of my concerns.
194 Comments