· 199 comments · Save ·
For Sale Mar 23, 2026 at 1:25 PM

Democrats want new Hill leaders. At 87, Maxine Waters isn’t budging.

Posted by Jonnyboo234


https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/23/maxine-waters-democrats-new-hill-leaders-00839497

🚩 Report this post

199 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
WHSRWizard Mar 23, 2026 +4838
Jesus Christ, GO HOME. Play with your grandkids. Dominate the local mahjong circuit. Furiously tickle your happy button to images of Gordon Ramsay cutting open a perfectly cooked beef Wellington. Literally do ANYTHING, but go home already.
4838
Utegenthal Mar 23, 2026 +1011
Her great-grandkids you mean?
1011
VapidRapidRabbit Mar 23, 2026 +603
She’s old enough to have great-great-grandchildren. She’ll probably be in there until she dies, same with Chuck Grassley, Nancy Pelosi, and all of the other silent generation members of Congress. Dianne Feinstein literally died while still in office. And then you have the boomers after them that also refuse to relinquish power.
603
LordEsquire Mar 23, 2026 +159
Pelosi is retiring
159
beforeitcloy Mar 23, 2026 +246
She turns 86 this week. She could easily die in office before the next congressperson takes over.
246
jkman61494 Mar 23, 2026 +71
She’s also still the house leader. It may not be official but she pulls Hakeem’s puppet strings
71
SSEiGuy Mar 23, 2026 +6
Jeffries being a puppet would explain his wooden movement and speech. Where is the energy that could lead the Democrats to press their advantage?
6
Uhhh_what555476384 Mar 23, 2026 +81
I don't think she puppets Jeffries, but she still has massive influence.  She'll have massive influence once retired too. She's the most successful Democrat in delivering policy wins of this century aside from Barack Obama himself. As much as I agree it's time for her to retire, past time, it would be nice if we saw an up and coming leader that was her equal. Also, the way they advance through leadership is by being able to raise money and direct it efficiently to the benefit of the caucus.  Lots of those fundraising contacts are personal and the members will still be going to her for help with that while she's alive.
81
whomad1215 Mar 23, 2026 +101
Hard to have an up and coming leader when the current leadership actively stifles them to maintain their own power and control also if I did the same job for nearly 40 years, I hope I'd be good at it too
101
MC_chrome Mar 23, 2026 +52
This ^ Jefferies has made it abundantly clear that he is not willing to entertain any sort of progressive policy or candidate, which is beyond pathetic and worthy of him being removed from leadership
52
Uhhh_what555476384 Mar 23, 2026 +13
Well in the US House that's not a given.  The political class is just the people that are generally the most popular kids in high school. If they go to law school rather then business school they usually will end up as politicians. That personality type, and the related skill to passively manage a large number of relationships, doesn't always come with competency in other areas of life.
13
bengalfan Mar 23, 2026 +4
This has always bothered me. Bankman Fried stole billions and here she is blowing a kiss at him. https://youtu.be/Dvxq2FGUx0I?si=UgqV4MwM_IGF5ESp
4
0nlyCrashes Mar 23, 2026 +3
Your first blurb is why I don't understand why they won't come out of office earlier. You'll still be in the sphere. You'll still have your soft power in an advisor roll. You'll have less spotlight and more room to do the shady shit they do. More free time for themselves. A whole slew of reasons. I never understood it.
3
zshadowhunter Mar 24, 2026 +1
that would of required the DNC to put time/$ into young up and comeinf candidates 10/20/30 years ago.... that's not what they want, so take the party back each and every primary and force the hand. /edit for typos.
1
Shopping_General Mar 23, 2026 +4
Can I just ask, who thought that guy was an effective leader? Who heard him speak and say, that's a guy I'd follow into battle. Anybody?
4
NicolasCageFan492 Mar 23, 2026 +37
She may be retiring but she’s still using her influence. https://www.axios.com/2026/02/15/pelosis-new-campaign-boost-newsom-for-2028
37
InnerSilent Mar 23, 2026 +3
She had to shatter her hip first.
3
Mistrblank Mar 23, 2026 +25
I'm going to be honest and assumed they were wheelchairing Feinstein around Congress still. I knew they reported the news she died. I just assumed they were still chairing her corpse around.
25
UniqueIndividual3579 Mar 23, 2026 +12
Half of Congress looks like "Weekend at Bernie's".
12
Hesitation-Marx Mar 23, 2026 +8
Dianne Feinstein was basically being wheeled around to vote and then stored in a root cellar until the next one. Why anyone wants to spend their entire life like that is beyond my comprehension.
8
YouWereBrained Mar 23, 2026 +16
And people will vote for her strictly on name recognition and Jim Clyburn “evangelitical” bullshit.
16
Angry-Dragon-1331 Mar 23, 2026 +43
Whichever. I don’t even care if it’s just the neighbor’s kids from down the street at this point. Just get the f*** out if making it through your two year term is a tossup.
43
NicolasCageFan492 Mar 23, 2026 +291
“Waters — who became the first woman and Black person to lead the panel in 2019 — faces **virtually no opposition**, despite a growing chorus of Democrats calling for the end of Capitol Hill’s enduring gerontocracy. Privately, some Democrats on and around the committee gripe that **she doesn’t do enough to elevate her members** or support them with campaign funds from the finance industry. But few are willing to publicly cross her, and **she maintains the backing of most senior Democrats** on the panel. Many of her colleagues say they’re eager to have the progressive icon leading key fights on the economy ahead of the 2028 elections.” Abiding by a seniority system while there’s an ongoing FASCIST COUP is the stupidest thing ever.
291
Taedirk Mar 23, 2026 +137
> she maintains the backing of most senior Democrats If you can get rid of one old bat, the peasants might start thinking they can get rid of two.
137
Uhhh_what555476384 Mar 23, 2026 +41
This is one of the weaknesses of Democratic politics.  The Democrats are a fairly loose coalition of political movements and the use strict adherence to seniority as a simple way to manage which of the movements "turn" it is to run policy.  It also allows them to do it while obscuring what movement each individual politician came from.
41
retoricalprophylaxis Mar 23, 2026 +31
> The Democrats are a fairly loose coalition of political movements and the use strict adherence to seniority as a simple way to manage which of the movements "turn" it is to run policy. By the time your movement's turn comes around, it always seems like your movement is in the interest of big corporate donors.
31
Uhhh_what555476384 Mar 23, 2026 +8
Being in government moderates people on average.  Part of the frustration with people like Schumer is the long serving members value things just working more then we do. In certain eras that's an important perspective, but not in the era of Trump.  The businesses know how to make that "just make it work" attitude to their advantage.  They seed problems in the system, legislative system, then offer to remove the problem for some legislative concession.
8
OhItsBeenBroughten Mar 23, 2026 +28
Someone has to run against her. That should be the takeaway. It’s easy to take potshots but no one is willing to run against her.
28
Brandonjh2 Mar 23, 2026 +8
Yeah, someone has to be willing to throw away a bunch of money, time, and future prospects given that the Dems have decided she is staying. Why won’t someone trash their life to make a point?!
8
FormalCartoonist5197 Mar 23, 2026 +15
This where when people give the sentiment that “Dems have done no wrong and don’t need to look inward for reasons they lost to open fascism and a pedo, everything is republicans fault”. And I just gesture wildly at the state of democrats like “reallly!?!?!? They had 0 part in their loss?”
15
incognito042620 Mar 23, 2026 +12
And even if you're of the mind that the Republicans won the election only through subterfuge and fraud, the margins still need to be close enough to make those tactics effective. Establishment Democrats go through life purposefully leaving almost all the meat on the bone; the Republicans would be a perpetual fringe party if Democrats were even half as willing to punch right as they are to punch down and left.
12
FormalCartoonist5197 Mar 23, 2026 +7
Omg yes thank you. I was just asking someone how many votes would have to have been fraud for the election results to not represent Dems lack of support and the real support of fascism in America. It’s all just excuses to do Absolutely nothing different and expecting different results…literal insanity.
7
TheAskewOne Mar 23, 2026 +6
Dems voted to put Gerry Connolly instead of AOC on the oversight committee because "he had been waiting for long and it was his turn". They knew he was old and sick and of course he died a few months later. How does it make sense? 
6
darksunshaman Mar 23, 2026 +18
Democrats are aces at doing what we would think of as "the stupidest thing ever".
18
VanceKelley Mar 23, 2026 +5
I thought that was all Americans. “Americans can always be trusted to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted.” - Winston Churchill
5
duckinradar Mar 23, 2026 +20
Maxine was a leader in regards to the watts riots(not implying she lead the riots-- the riots were easily avoidable and caused by bad policing) The watts riots were in 1965. Come the f*** on.
20
Tight-Shallot2461 Mar 23, 2026 +15
>Furiously tickle your happy button to images of Gordon Ramsay cutting open a perfectly cooked beef Wellington LMAO
15
BerryLanky Mar 23, 2026 +43
Remember when people were encouraging Ruth Ginsberg to retire during Obama’s tenure and she dug her heels in. Sometimes you have to step back and do what is in the best interest of your party.
43
aerost0rm Mar 23, 2026 +11
This is what sets the tone. Do what’s right after showing that doing the wrong thing hurts the party and the country.
11
FrogWhoAteMoon Mar 23, 2026 +22
We didn't allow my grandpa to drive once he was... 86? His reaction times were abysmal. He wasn't stupid, or demented, but he was *old*. At that age, most people are lacking the mental capacities to appropriately adapt to new information and changes in scenery in a timely fashion.
22
aerost0rm Mar 23, 2026 +8
I doubt she understands the nuances of the internet and AI..
8
adrr Mar 23, 2026 +55
The bigger problem. No one votes in primaries except old people. Could easily vote out Maxine waters. if you young people bothered to fill out their ballot and drop it in the mail. Only 1 out 5 will actually vote, too much effort. Dems want younger people but can't be bothered to vote in primaries.
55
dhrisc Mar 23, 2026 +29
Thats because they rely on a large coalition of voters who dont identify themselves with the party and theyve shown themselves to be resistant to change. It takes a very organized outside force, like the DSA in New York to mobilize the young people for any outsider campaign. Many dem voters simply hate the party almost as much as they hate republicans, and many dem leaders seem to resent up and comers, outsiders and the people whose vote they need.
29
aerost0rm Mar 23, 2026 +12
Ofc they resent new and upcoming members. They want to end inside trading, get money out of politics, cut the bloated and wasteful spending on military. Rein in the powers of the rich. The oligarchs and wealthy politicians don’t like this. They would rather keep their power and wealth…
12
Pettifoggerist Mar 23, 2026 +6
Waters won her 2024 primary with fewer than 55,000 votes of 78,000 cast, as compared to 213,000 votes cast in the general. There definitely need to be more people voting in primaries if anything is going to change.
6
orangotai Mar 23, 2026 +3
we're only going to see more & more of that as society ages and people stop having kids
3
SylVegas Mar 23, 2026 +8
My boss is 81 and absolutely refuses to retire. What is it with people not wanting to collect their pension and take it easy? I'd retire at 65 if I could!
8
hijetty Mar 23, 2026 +5
What's sad is they'd also have ENORMOUS political power after leaving office in their local communities through foundations or what not doing tremendous good helping their community, which I assume is why they got into politics in the first place!  People like Waters have ruined their legacy for me. 
5
chappelld Mar 23, 2026 +7
My man said happy button
7
fuckswitbeavers Mar 23, 2026 +5
They want to die on the throne. I’m not even joking, they dream about it
5
Hot-Mathematician691 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Or help raise up the next generation from the background
3
Pans_Labradoodle Mar 23, 2026 +6
Maxine intends to stick it out to the very end so her daughter can be picked to replace her. Grassley is doing the same thing for his son.
6
Ill-Cobbler-3080 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Grassley’s children are all past retirement age, he‘s holding the seat for his grandson, who’s the iowa house speaker
1
NimusNix Mar 23, 2026 +14
Her voters could do something about it. Have you tried talking to them?
14
WHSRWizard Mar 23, 2026 +37
She's running unopposed because the machinery discourages (to put it mildly) challengers to the seniority.
37
NimusNix Mar 23, 2026 +17
And yet no one locally wants to challenge that? Certainly didn't stop AOC. The point being, no amount of bitching online is going to do anything about it. Her constituents are happy with her, the rest of us just have to deal.
17
virrk Mar 23, 2026 +17
The constituents were not happy with Diane Feinstein, even the state Democratic Party endorsed someone else because California didn't want to elect her again. National Democratic Committee effectively said f*** you California and put all their effort into getting her elected again. Just because someone gets elected does not mean their constituents actually wanted them.
17
Wandos7 Mar 23, 2026 +6
I live in her district. No one runs against her except for the GOP and they always send [idiots](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Navarro).
6
skipjac Mar 23, 2026 +5
Boomers will never give up power
5
emau55 Mar 23, 2026 +9
I don’t think anybody normal can understand how insecure and vacuous these people are. No soul, just power.
9
BigHungryFlamingo Mar 23, 2026 +1683
Isn’t budging? She’s like 87 pounds. Pick her up, put her in a nice comfy chair at home, and tell her to enjoy retirement.  I’m so sick of being ruled by people who could blow over in the wind. 
1683
BallKnowerKing Mar 23, 2026 +491
It’s crazy they vote on legislation that they won’t live to see.  There was a proposed environmental bill that would start in 2035. And the irony is a good amount of the people voting on it will likely be dead by then 
491
TheBetawave Mar 23, 2026 +59
I think that allows for us to change it tho before it starts. To correct this wrong path we are being sent down.
59
BigHungryFlamingo Mar 23, 2026 +52
If they vote to protect the environment, sure.  But most times, they vote “well, imma be dead so whatever, lol” and take bribes and throw away our future. 
52
Your_Momma_Said Mar 23, 2026 +9
Plenty of younger people are like that too. I knew someone who was happily kid free and didn't see the point in recycling. The opinion was "I'm not going to be here". When I asked about "good for humanity" they would say "why? who cares about humanity"
9
VerilyShelly Mar 23, 2026 +8
Right. The obsession with age is understandable, but young doesn't mean smarter, more aware, more moral or more altruistic.
8
Human-Election-9939 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Its squares and rectangles. Not all old people are evil. But (virtually) all of the evil people who hoard half of the world's wealth are old men
3
No_Consequence7919 Mar 23, 2026 +36
I agree there should be an age limit. I would think 75 is my limit. I remember back around 69 ish. My age kids couldn't wait for our age politicians to get in so we could fix the world. We are now the ones running the show and they forgot, much of what we did not like about government, leaders and the lies they told about Vietnam. Until Walter Cronkite, the most trusted anchor at the time, told the American people. We were not winning the war and probably could not win. Something my age people had been thinking and saying for a long while. We were understanding the military machine. The large weath investors in that machine. We may be doing it again.
36
MRSN4P Mar 23, 2026 +10
Is there a Walter Cronkite now that can get republican-as-religion people to wake up to the incredible sabotage of various systems by DOGE such as USAID; theft of social security data; dismissal of Inspectors General; blatant bribery (pandering for bribery!) from domestic and foreign entities; rollback of protections for the environment, food, workplaces; stealing food from poor children at home and abroad, setting up millions to die; the harassment, abuse, kidnapping and murder of people in broad daylight for having a particular ethnic heritage; outrageous denial of many forms of oversight, etc…
10
UniqueIndividual3579 Mar 23, 2026 +5
The age of Walter Cronkite is passed. Best we can do is an influencer throwing gallons of milk on the supermarket floor.
5
Evilhenchman Mar 23, 2026 +13
The age limit should be the same as standard retirement age, 65 or even 67, but that's it. You're older? You're outta here.
13
Electronic_Film_2837 Mar 23, 2026 +4
So sanders shouldn’t have run in 2016?
4
Evilhenchman Mar 23, 2026 +16
Nope, probably not. I like him but he's too old.
16
[deleted] Mar 23, 2026 +14
[deleted]
14
UnobviousDiver Mar 23, 2026 +960
The sooner the old guard retires or dies, the sooner we can get on with fixing this country
960
Old_Cryptid Mar 23, 2026 +553
Been hearing this for the better part of 20 years. They're bound and determined to die at their seat.
553
M00nch1ld3 Mar 23, 2026 +161
They like the power, they like the privilege, the like the deference others should show them. All the trappings, and they get to decide on the most important things that affect everyone. They don't have to do anything they don't want to. It's perfect. Why give it up? Besides, of course, that you aren't doing the PEOPLE any good.
161
floog Mar 23, 2026 +47
Who wouldn’t want legal insider trading?! These corrupt assholes.
47
TrappedInOhio Mar 23, 2026 +25
I genuinely wonder the last time any of those people even thought about the concerns of their actual voters.
25
Ro24 Mar 23, 2026 +18
That's because it isn't an age thing it's a class thing. It's not old vs young. It's the Billionaire Epstein class and their pet politicians vs the rest of us
18
OutlawSundown Mar 23, 2026 +3
Plus long term you'd really need to get a commitment to age capping leadership positions as a rule. I wish we had the parliamentary leadership culture of falling on your sword after poor election results. You get your shot to lead and if you fail to produce then it's time to step aside.
3
primetimerobus Mar 23, 2026 +38
When that happens the next generation of leadership will be that age and is the new old guard. They need to develop a culture of not always following seniority and setting up younger members to lead the party. Bit that requires thinking about more than themselves so that won’t happen.
38
KellyAnn3106 Mar 23, 2026 +22
Back in the 80s, a Colorado governor very bluntly said that old people have a duty to die and get out of the way. I'd be happy with just the "get out of the way" part.
22
Shagwagbag Mar 23, 2026 +15
A Generation of Sociopaths review – how Trump and other Baby Boomers ruined the world | Books | The Guardian https://share.google/c3Y7zEUKfLPDCCC6W
15
DefiantBumblebee9903 Mar 23, 2026 +6
somehow being a politician is the secret to longevity, they will never die 😔
6
ucemike Mar 23, 2026 +7
> The sooner the old guard retires or dies, the sooner we can get on with fixing this country Age really isn't the biggest problem we have. There are "younger" people that are doing a lot worse for the country. Not saying we need to keep both but if they aren't doing what we want, get'm all out. Lot easier said than done.
7
Much-Instruction-807 Mar 23, 2026 +406
Been in congress for most of the millennial generation's life and we're reaching middle age. Get the f*** out.
406
loki1887 Mar 23, 2026 +122
My rep, Marcy Kaptur, is 79 years old and has been representing my district since before I was born in 1987. Elected in 1986.
122
flaaaacid Mar 23, 2026 +54
She visited my high school freshman year. I am 44.
54
FizzyBeverage Mar 23, 2026 +21
Hal Rogers (R-KY) and Chris Smith (R-NJ) were both elected in 1980 and been there for 46 years. It's **insane.** I'm 42. They've had no other job my entire life. My oldest is 11. Fundamentally broken.
21
Ok_Vermicelli_6359 Mar 23, 2026 +10
Wow...never heard of her. What a life she must lead, doing nothing of note for TWO generations now 👏
10
Colonel-Mooseknuckle Mar 23, 2026 +471
What the f*** is with all these dinosaurs refusing to give up power? You can't even trust most people at her age behind the wheel of a car, yet they think they should be making decisions for the rest of us.
471
I_Enjoy_Beer Mar 23, 2026 +206
Power.  They love the power, being in the middle of everything.  And also, retiring means admitting they are not just losing political power, but admitting their own mortality and frailty.  We need age limits.
206
Tight-Shallot2461 Mar 23, 2026 +21
Yep
21
EverWatcher Mar 23, 2026 +8
I can easily imagine them thinking "so what are you trying to say?!?" when advisors and assistants express concerns. Some of these super-old politicians are well aware of the current situation but are in denial...
8
Things_with_Stuff Mar 23, 2026 +6
And term limits!
6
wolferman Mar 23, 2026 +67
She probably needs help setting up her iPhone. Someone like that should not be voting on regulations related to technology. She probably can’t remember her high school teachers’ names. Someone that old should not be voting on legislation that affects education. She probably can’t remember all of her medication that she takes daily. Someone that old shouldn’t be voting on legislation that involves our healthcare. I love our elderly population, but they should not be running the country.
67
Colonel-Mooseknuckle Mar 23, 2026 +37
In fairness, I'm half her age and can't remember any of my high school teacher's names.
37
pyrhus626 Mar 23, 2026 +3
I’m closer to a third her age and I can only remember a few
3
smurfsundermybed Mar 23, 2026 +4
Also relevance. Once this gig is up, there won't be anyone who HAS to listen to her.
4
zerocoolforschool Mar 23, 2026 +16
Why do people keep voting for them?????
16
VerilyShelly Mar 23, 2026 +19
Probably because in the primary election they are running against people that seem like a worse choice. People really need to pay attention to the primaries and start researching who else in in the field before it's time to vote. By the time it's the generals and R vs. D it's too late.
19
certciv Mar 23, 2026 +12
This is it. In 'safe' districts the real election for a seat in the House is the primary. But running against an incumbent of the same party is discouraged by both parties. It's hard to get quality candidates to even consider running in those circumstances, both because they know it will sour their own party against them, and the high probability of a loss could very well end their future political aspirations. We need reforms like proportional and ranked choice voting to give voters better choices, and help break the political duopoly that has a strangle hold on our politics.
12
GravyMcBiscuits Mar 23, 2026 +10
It's because it's the easiest gig in the whole world. You literally don't have to do anything (after being elected of course). I thinks folks should elect me. I'm great at doing nothing!
10
chubs66 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Almost nobody willingly gives up power. Democracies need to account for this brute fact with something like term limits, we'll be ruled (represented) by elderly.
3
cokecaine Mar 23, 2026 +3
They have no life outside their job.
3
maybe-an-ai Mar 23, 2026 +5
Boomers dedicated everything to work, no hobbies, nothing. Retirement is daunting because they don't have lives outside of work.
5
dBlock845 Mar 23, 2026 +51
There is a cadre of them, probably close to a dozen: Waters, Holmes-Norton, Clyburn, Cleaver, DeLauro, etc.. They all need to give it up and let the younger generation have their say. Holmes-Norton got lost looking for a podium that was 4 feet in front of her.
51
Kerbonaut2019 Mar 23, 2026 +40
Hell, Chuck Grassley is 92 and he’s third in line for the presidency! Insane.
40
tirefires Mar 23, 2026 +16
Been a politician since *1959* and still claims to be a farmer. 
16
broden89 Mar 23, 2026 +5
That's the year my father was *born*. He's about to retire.
5
CallousBastard Mar 23, 2026 +77
I'm not even 60 yet and can't wait to retire. WTF is wrong with these people?
77
Upstairs_Baby8424 Mar 23, 2026 +53
Because most of these people don’t actually work. They get great benefits. Money. Influence. Catered meals. Invited to lavish dinners. And get their pockets lined. All just to nod a few times here and there. Waters hasn’t done anything of consequence in ages. Nothing more than a bump on a log.
53
Sim888 Mar 23, 2026 +8
Yep, this is it….they don’t do shit. As if dinosaurs like this would still be working if it was a “normal” job, with even a hint of accountability, deliverables, kpi’s etc…shit, even if they wanted to 9 outta 10 wouldn’t be able to physically
8
BerlinBorough2 Mar 23, 2026 +5
CEO’s at least have the potential to go to jail. Like the Enron guys. Top democrats fumble the bag and carry on like nothing happened in 2016 and 2024.
5
retiredhawaii Mar 23, 2026 +15
The only jobs in America where people want to work as long as they can. Sure makes you wonder how cushy/beneficial the job is. Millionaire politicians with the best pension and medical benefits in America and they all say I’m not retiring. I prefer to keep “working” until I’m close to death. Most people hope/plan to retire in their sixties. These politicians want to work until 80 or 90. No one believes it’s not for themselves but for the people. It’s why none of them are whistleblowers.
15
foureyedinabox Mar 23, 2026 +128
She’s my rep, I do not want her representing me, I have emailed her several times and just get stock answers. I will not vote for her in the primary.
128
svenjj Mar 23, 2026 +23
Same. I went to her last townhall. She sucks so hard and dodged my questions while also being a war hawk. While I won't vote for her, none of the primary challengers seem remotely viable. They need to fix campaign financing to make it easier for non-wealthy people to run.
23
Aqualung812 Mar 23, 2026 +7
It looks like you have 3 other Democratic choices. Why do others in your district keep voting for her? BTW I live in Indiana so please know when I ask that, I'm not saying it in a crappy way. I know my neighbors vote the way they do because of racism. I assume the answer where you are is different.
7
AnusOprah Mar 23, 2026 +5
> She’s my rep, I do not want her representing me, I have emailed her several times and just get stock answers. > > I will not vote for her in the primary. Email her that, and cc the DNC
5
sirtaken Mar 23, 2026 +13
Just stick her in a nursing home and tell her it’s congress she literally couldn’t tell the difference at this point and would likely accomplish about the same.
13
seanwd11 Mar 23, 2026 +40
By the time the current old people die there will just be a new tranche of old corpses to deal with. The Eternal Gerentocracy. The world's lamest Twilight Zone episode.
40
EverWatcher Mar 23, 2026 +4
This is an interesting point: we should focus more on the elections in which no candidate is an incumbent...
4
seanwd11 Mar 23, 2026 +5
Agreed. Two terms in any post and then out the door. That should be across the board.
5
Competitive-Bike-277 Mar 23, 2026 +56
FFS when I'm 87 I want to be retired. Talk about power mongering. 
56
dirtytounder Mar 23, 2026 +34
I want be retired when i'm 57
34
JahoclaveS Mar 23, 2026 +16
F***, I wanted to be retired when I was 20. I’d make a great Congress person. A few years of insider trading to set myself up for life, then f****** off to a life of luxury and travel.
16
andykekomi Mar 23, 2026 +3
I'm almost 30 and I can't wait for retirement already. To think that I would still be working for another FIFTY-EIGHT YEARS is completely insane to me.
3
Plantguysteve Mar 23, 2026 +12
She’s still alive?
12
No_Trade3571 Mar 23, 2026 +9
No. Her staff raises her hand to vote just like they did with Diane Feinstein. Edit: added the word hand
9
TKK2019 Mar 23, 2026 +48
Not sure if it’s only age. Jeffries is completely useless as well and he could be her grandson age wise
48
Lollipopsaurus Mar 23, 2026 +69
It's because people don't vote in primaries. That's the entire problem.
69
VerilyShelly Mar 23, 2026 +40
The primaries also need competent people running. If Waters is up against someone who didn't have the stuff then Waters gets tapped to go again. Great young candidates don't materialize out of thin air. Who are the people in her district that *could* replace her? People yell for her to go, but replacing her with a young fool is worse.
40
TheAskewOne Mar 23, 2026 +3
Great young candidates especially don’t materialize when the old guard do everything they can to stop them. 
3
HollyBerries85 Mar 23, 2026 +3
The problem is that politicians in general, on both sides of the aisle, view being primaried from within their party as tantamount to mutiny. Doing it, unless you have a TON of support from the old guard (which doesn't happen as long as the person you're going against is also in the old guard) is political suicide unless the person you're going again is being cut off from above. No one will support you and no one will work with you again, they close ranks to shut out challengers unless someone has literally died.
3
GuitarCD Mar 23, 2026 +9
This sort of hurts to read. I remember the days leading up to Bush II, and during the worst abuses of power during that administration Maxine Waters was among a handful of Democrats actually fighting... This was during a time when I built up a fury to Nancy "impeachment is off the table" Pelosi only to have an older friend talk about a time where she (Pelosi) was the only one talking about AIDS and LGBTQ issues in the House, etc. as her liberal cred, and I replied with "we need THAT Nancy Pelosi today, where the hell did she go?" Where the hell did that Maxine Waters go? I don't know, but if there's any part of her spirit and fight left other than her desire to hold power, I'd ask it to move aside and let someone fresh into the fight. I'm not going to defend her because I remember her glory days or think she looks "stylish" while making some tiny gesture of resistance while spending the rest of her time playing it safe with the rest of the old guard.
9
hamiltd3 Mar 23, 2026 +7
We need young people to get out there and actually energize the younger Generations to be interested in politics. When everyone just sees these old out of touch people running the country and getting rich off of it and being as corrupt as possible, nobody wants to go vote and they stay out of politics. I just remember how energized people were when Obama was campaigning and we really need charisma and character and new fresh ideas and people who actually understand what's happening in our country. It's time for all the old people to step aside
7
Reddit0sername Mar 23, 2026 +6
Shameful. Pure EGO. Shame. Shame. Shame.
6
Sea_Comedian_3941 Mar 23, 2026 +6
She was born in 1938 for f*** sake. Trump is 1946. We need some limits on this stuff!
6
SauntOrolo Mar 23, 2026 +7
Ruth Bader Ginsburg superstar teamwork award!
7
Dirty_Dishis Mar 24, 2026 +1
Blame. the. voters. This is the voters fault. They cant stay in if people dont vote for them. It is a big f****** mirror.
1
MomsBored Mar 23, 2026 +16
It is absolutely greedy and shameful for anyone over 65 to continue to hold a seat. We need a government that reflects the experiences and beliefs that are in this current decade. They all are just using their positions as a cash cow and leave only upon their deaths. Collecting tax payer funded paychecks and benefits. It needs to end. Respectfully. The boomers have shown their unbridled ego & greed. It’s time to put protections in place so this never happens again.
16
Un1CornTowel Mar 23, 2026 +29
The party gets to choose, not her. Kick her to the curb.
29
[deleted] Mar 23, 2026 +5
[deleted]
5
Duke_Built Mar 23, 2026 +14
Man we gotta get these old mother fuckers out. I’m so over all this outdated ideology and old mother f***** BS.
14
darkhorsehance Mar 23, 2026 +10
Maxine Waters isn’t a boomer, she’s from the silent generation. Current boomer age range is 62 - 80.
10
Duke_Built Mar 23, 2026 +5
I will revise my statement to “We need all these old motherfuckers out of positions of power”
5
Metro42014 Mar 23, 2026 +5
The lack of continuity/succession planning from the party leaders is egregious. It's absurd that the party leadership hasn't been cultivating successors for decades under these long-standing officials.
5
Big-Leadership-4604 Mar 23, 2026 +6
I like Maxine. But if your are over 70 you shouldnt be in elected office.
6
snakebite75 Mar 23, 2026 +5
IMHO once they reach the national age of retirement they should be allowed to finish their current term and then not be allowed to run again.
5
Lima__Fox Mar 23, 2026 +5
So many democrats are going to Ginsberg their own reputations by sticking around and becoming a liability to progress.
5
youarelookingatthis Mar 23, 2026 +5
If we saw an 87 year old working any other job, we’d say it was elder abuse…
5
Timujin1986 Mar 23, 2026 +6
The United States used to make fun of the ailing Soviet gerontocracy during the late 70s and 80s. Now the US itself is being ruled by a senior citizen retirement condo.
6
Aeon1508 Mar 24, 2026 +1
vote👏🏼in👏🏼the👏🏼primary👏🏼
1
PenSpecialist4650 Mar 23, 2026 +13
Unfortunately, progress is going to come with funerals. It’s not our time yet.
13
I_might_be_weasel Mar 23, 2026 +14
It is way past our time. But the previous leaders won't cede power. Since we apparently can't remove them with democracy we have to wait until they fall over dead at their desks.
14
Zalophusdvm Mar 23, 2026 +9
I genuinely don’t get this. Have you seen what Hakeem Jeffries is like? “New,” and “younger,” isn’t by definition better. I don’t really care about anyone’s age…I just want them to do better.
9
biywam Mar 23, 2026 +14
Vote her and all the rest of them out? Why do people act like this is a hard thing to do?
14
Flaky-Jim Mar 23, 2026 +3
The sheer selfishness of some of these politicians is staggering.
3
Downtown_Soil_3651 Mar 23, 2026 +4
She was born in 1938. GTFO.
4
imJGott Mar 23, 2026 +5
This is why there needs to be an age limit.
5
radwimps Mar 23, 2026 +4
Jesus how much more money could she possibly want at 87
4
imperial_scum Mar 23, 2026 +4
Maybe y'all should focus thy efforts on the people who elect her instead of blindly screaming into the bot infested ether
4
Melted_ICE_5193 Mar 23, 2026 +3
I said this before in another post. I like to call it the Millennial Congress/Senate Project. One shall be ineligible to hold a seat in Congress or Senate, even if elected or are currently a sitting member of the house of representatives, if: - They are above the age of 60. - They've held a seat for a combination of 20 years, House and Senate Combined. - A Budget bill has not been passed on X Day of any Year they are currently holding a seat. - They do not present, co-author or vote on a bill at least once every 30 days. - Their net worth increases by any amount greater than 10x from the time they enter Congress. - They own private stock in any individual company. - Any Bill or action they pass will negatively impact their given constituents, based on survey sent out to 95% of their constituents, every new bill passed. (If they pass a bill, and 12 months later a survey is sent out and a majority 60+% of people who they represent say this bill/law negatively impacts them they are automatically kicked from their seat.) Also, once a sitting member leaves Congress there is an 4 year moratorium on working as a private consultant, in any industry that you once had any jurisdiction over.
3
Historical_Bend_2629 Mar 23, 2026 +4
Checked out her district. Three other d candidates running. So there are alternatives. There is a systemic problem.
4
Soberdonkey69 Mar 23, 2026 +5
Old people are actively ruining the country for the younger generation. They will literally die in these political jobs than hand over to the younger generation.
5
Ehgadsman Mar 23, 2026 +3
Sure hang on to personal power and prestige for ego over politics and progress.
3
Farabee Mar 23, 2026 +4
We need term limits on Congressional seats. Being a representative for 20 years isn't democracy.
4
Papawasaboringstone Mar 24, 2026 +1
How the f*** is this party so clueless? You can’t run as the lesser of two evils. It’s failed time and time again.
1
laura_leigh Mar 23, 2026 +20
A year and a half of Schumer/Jeffries leadership under Trump and I'm done playing. Especially after Chris Murphy had the nerve to say Dems are unified behind Schumer. Until they are gone and healthcare is back on the table: 1.) No money. No donations. F*** off ActBlue, you're not getting a cent. 2.) I'm not "spreading the word" or defending your BS excuses. I'm tired of the gaslighting. 3.) I'm not putting all the blame on Trump. You can stand right beside him and take your responsibility because YOU enabled him. Dems have 6 months so they better use it wisely and figure out how to UN-UNIFY themselves with a healthcare destroying genocidal tyrant supporting shambling corpse with his readers tottering off his nose and start supporting the American people.
20
chele68 Mar 23, 2026 +13
I deleted my ActBlue account when it became obvious the Dems twiddled their thumbs between the election and inauguration. I unsubscribe from any emails and reply ‘stop’ to all texts. Cory Booker is about to go on a book tour. I just can’t with these people.
13
fr0z3nf1r3 Mar 23, 2026 +3
She's not budging because she's dead. Kindly remove the corpse from the seat so it can be filled with someone with a pulse.
3
woodpaulusgnome Mar 23, 2026 +3
It’s just f****** selfish of octogenarians to still think that they have something to give to a more youthful society. Let go and give a hand up to your successor.
3
raerae1991 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Term limits would fix this shit!
3
Reeko_Htown Mar 23, 2026 +3
These old fucks must have access to some special medical care they can’t get if they leave the Capital. My only explanation
3
wh0_RU Mar 23, 2026 +3
The boomers aren't letting go lmao. I'm not even one to use the term boomer because my parents and I respect them but lmao
3
NY-3D Mar 23, 2026 +3
I would imagine that the aides are the biggest impediment to these old politicians continuing to run. They are the ones who need it the most and are milking them for as long as possible 
3
Specialjyo Mar 23, 2026 +3
getting elected to Congress is retirement. Everything provided for you, even a staff that does all the work.
3
2lilbiscuits Mar 23, 2026 +3
I hate these people stay in power for so long, but it is absolutely our fault that they aren’t primaried. We have only ourselves to blame for the olds.
3
RobertdBanks Mar 23, 2026 +3
We need the means to remove anyone from any level of political office. There needs to be the ability to call for a “no confidence vote” where the people of the state can then vote for or against.
3
tomnomk Mar 23, 2026 +3
She was born in 1938. Yet she still governs in 2026. I live with my 80 year old grandmother, and I just don’t understand how a person of that age can comprehend the struggles of the newer generation.
3
idkbruh653 Mar 23, 2026 +3
As an LA local whose parents and family members voted for her, she needs to go. She was elected when I was 3. I’ll be 38 this year. That’s insane.
3
Joerugger Mar 23, 2026 +3
Dear Gawds someone primary her and everyone over the age of 65 in congress.
3
humboldtHue Mar 23, 2026 +3
Thank you for your service, Maxine, now GTFOH.
3
secret_squirrels_nut Mar 23, 2026 +3
shy six apparatus relieved zephyr rich wrench beneficial include marvelous
3
brainsack Mar 23, 2026 +3
MOTHER F****** TERM LIMITS PLEASE. I don’t care how well intentioned you are, how great of a legislator, or negotiator you are. Eighty f****** Seven years old is too old. Holy shit man
3
philipjfry_ Mar 23, 2026 +3
We need fresh because these folks don't have the energy to deal. And they let us get to the point where we're at today, which says a lot.
3
Turtlenumber13 Mar 23, 2026 +3
Term limits for all.
3
minus_minus Mar 23, 2026 +3
The GOP largely solved this problem by having term limits for committee chairs. The Dems desperately need to do the same. 
3
ailish Mar 23, 2026 +3
I wish her no ill-will. Like, she was a woman of firsts in Congress, and that means something. But f****** A, let it go already. Retire and let the younger generation take charge. It's time to give it the f*** up.
3
CrackingToastGromet Mar 24, 2026 +1
Then primary her? That’s how it works, right? If these old folks can’t read the room then we have to show them the door.
1
stumper93 Mar 24, 2026 +1
Chuck Grassley has been in congress representing Iowa in the house and senate since 1959!! Besides money and power I don’t know what these fossils see about still wanting to work in congress til they die
1
TheFrontCrashesFirst Mar 24, 2026 +1
In 25 years this country could be great. Assuming all these people actually die, and aren't immortal vampires.
1
sunzoje Mar 24, 2026 +1
There should be term limit.
1
Gtoast Mar 24, 2026 +1
Jesus. Don’t these people have any grand kids? No wonder they don’t do shit: they’re tired.
1
Major_Clue_778 Mar 24, 2026 +1
The people deciding the future have no stake in it.
1
californicating Mar 23, 2026 +7
So primary her.  Don't let it be her choice. 
7
purplebrown_updown Mar 23, 2026 +6
They haven’t learned anything after Biden
6
MommyLovesPot8toes Mar 23, 2026 +5
> More importantly, Waters maintains the backing of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is **in line to become House speaker if Democrats take back the chamber.** This cannot happen. Jeffries shouldn't even get reelected, let alone be speaker.
5
← Back to Board