Democrats Who Voted With Republicans to Confirm Markwayne Mullin

F****** Fetterman. He’s absolutely worthless.

"Democratic Senators John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and Martin Heinrich of New Mexico crossed party lines to support the nomination, while Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky was the sole GOP member to vote against it. Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona, did not vote."

This is why we have Primaries. New Mexico and PA democrats, don’t let them get away with this.

>"Democratic Senators [John Fetterman](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/john-fetterman) of Pennsylvania and Martin Heinrich of New Mexico crossed party lines to support the nomination, while Republican Senator [Rand Paul](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/rand-paul) of Kentucky was the sole GOP member to vote against it. Senator Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona, did not vote." Fetterman is not really a Democrat. He pretended to be one to get elected in PA.

Fetterman is a Republican and needs to be replaced.

Fetterman has become a well known ass. Never heard of Heinrich till now. Guess he has claimed his 15 minutes of infamy.

The pattern repeats. There are always enough Democrats to vote with Republicans to advance the Republican agenda.

John Fuckerman

I would say what I really think about them but I don't want to take the chance of a week long suspension.

Gallego is still leagues better than Sinema and thank God he beat Kari Lake, but between this and the Laiken Riley Act, and supporting Trump's immigration policies, he's on a shaky path. Coming from a state that mobilized en masse to help defeat SB1070, where Latinos were terrorized by Joe Arpaio's thugs and are still terrorized by vigilantes to this day, one where Latino votes face massive voter suppression, where Latinos and not even being able to vote against Mullin who will oversee massive due process violations even more voter suppression. I can appreciate that he represents a divided state, but you can't advocate for DREAMers and asylum seekers as much as he does while also voting for a law that denies them due process protections, presumes guilt without a conviction, and not even fighting for provisions to protect DACA, noncitizen residents, and people in the asylum process.

Part of me... the tiny of tiny part of me thinks they did this so Mullin will screw up so bad, the GOP will lose any chance of a majority for the next 30 plus years... We're talking 0.03% chance. The bar has been set to Tartarus lvl at this point.

Start naming all of the Republicans as well. There are good Republicans but anyone who votes pro child molester needs to be named

Different face in front of the same brain.

Here's the problem with primarying John Fetterman, and I don't think people would like to acknowledge it, but it's reality. Let's say he loses, who do you nominate? Shapiro would not be the worst idea, but he clearly has presidential ambition, something Fetterman has called out multiple times. And then Democrats run the risk of nominating somebody further left and losing the moderate right. John Fetterman largely got his seat by winning suburban Republicans; if we all remember, his opponent was, ironically enough Dr Oz. Fetterman still votes with Democrats more times than not, but he just doesn't always preach from the same book. I think it's the Democratic Party would be doing itself a great disservice by primarying him.