· 124 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 19, 2026 at 8:04 AM

Desperate for social media ban, but parents say it’s 'impossible'

Posted by BendicantMias


Desperate for social media ban to work, but parents say it’s 'impossible'
www.abc.net.au
Desperate for social media ban to work, but parents say it’s 'impossible'
Tech companies are coming under fire as Australian parents increasingly voice concerns that some online platforms are failing to keep kids under 16 off their platforms.

🚩 Report this post

124 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
forgiuse 9 hr ago +494
Parents will have to do actual parenting if their children got banned from using social media.
494
BendicantMias 9 hr ago +86
> "In reality, nothing is happening on the ground. It's still being left to parents to enforce." > "Once your child has a phone, unless you are tech savvy and on top of all the parental controls, it's difficult to know everything they are doing."
86
iko-01 9 hr ago +1
we're like 25 years into tech being relevant in day to day lives. Anyone who still says that they're "not tech savvy" is just too lazy to look up a youtube video titled "how to set up parental settings on android phones" or something. Like come on lol I'm not saying it's easy, but it ain't impossible. Tech savvy is like; programming at this point - not setting up google family link lmao
1
warlordcs 9 hr ago +1
we also had cars for many decades but still have people that think a sudden left turn from the right lane 5 lanes across a road is a reasonable action to take. basically we have a lot of straight up dumb people
1
ModernSimian 8 hr ago +1
Think of the absolutely most average person you know. Half of people are dumber than that.
1
MagicCuboid 7 hr ago +1
Bell curves don’t really work like that… most people are average. Some people are very bright, and some are very dumb.
1
EmmaFrostBroken 9 hr ago +1
Agreed. A parent of a young person today, let's say someone 40 years old, absolutely grew up with all of this stuff from a young age. It's not like they were born in 1950 and it never existed for most of their life. They grew up with the internet and computers. And technology is really in a lot of ways more user friendly than ever. Setting up something like parental controls is not complicated.
1
iko-01 8 hr ago +1
>It's not like they were born in 1950 and it never existed for most of their life The funny thing is; my dad was born in the 60s and he's a programmer. We had computers, laptops, mobile phones and the internet since the 90s. You'd have to go much further back than the 50s to make an excuse for these people and even then; I'd argue that if those older generations could drive across country without GPS, or do data input without the help of excel or something like that; then they can easily figure out how to follow some basic instructions on setting up parental control. Not that many 60+ yr olds are having kids but you get my point lol
1
KriistofferJohansson 8 hr ago +1
Not everyone from the ‘60s are programmers. Someone born in the 1960 won’t necessarily have experienced technology on a daily basis for most of their life. Your father would be the exception.
1
iko-01 8 hr ago +1
Sure, he's the exception but I'm just pointing out that even my parents, knew how to block MAC addresses after midnight and take away my PSP before bed time in the 2000s. Like, this isn't anything new. If you wanna do parental control, you are one google search away from knowing where and how to do it for your kids. Yes, kids are savvy and will try to avoid your tactics, that's to be expected but unless the average 15yr old is about to root their phone and bypass this stuff, it's gonna work on 99% of the kids.
1
KriistofferJohansson 8 hr ago +1
Right, but there was no YouTube to get instructions from on how to do that back in the day. They knew how to do that because of their job and interest. It wasn’t common knowledge or easy to look up. There’s no such excuse today, and that’s because of how easy it is to find information on the matter - not because your parents knew how to do it in the ‘80-‘90s.
1
iko-01 8 hr ago +1
>Right, but there was no YouTube to get instructions from on how to do that back in the day. Parents would rather raise a child and argue that it's hard than take blame for something that they themselves, could control. I get it, parenting is exhausting and takes effort but in the same way my dad looked up how to IP ban in the 2000s because I was on my laptop past midnight, parents today could be keeping up with tiktok trends and teen culture to make sure that everything is in order. The bare minimum is setting up parental control, that's the part that takes zero effort by todays standards. I still remember my friend's parents idea of punishment was to take away his VGA cable so he couldn't play his xbox. Like, what are we talking about - a parrot could figure out a workaround to that issue, let alone a teenager.
1
soerenL 7 hr ago +1
The kids are also one google search away from knowing how to bypass parental controls. If one kid can’t figure it out, a friend of theirs will help.
1
hat1337 8 hr ago +1
That's a silly take. I guarantee you the smart kids can outsmart you when it comes to tech. It was always the case. You think you're different but you're not
1
cylemons 8 hr ago +1
If they're THAT determined, they earned it
1
Romeo_Jordan 8 hr ago +1
And we still have no regulation, that's insane.
1
ToWanderHer 8 hr ago +1
I was blessed to be a kid when we transitioned from analog to digital so I'm quite tech savvy. I've also been the one who gets to train everyone else at home, work, everywhere. Yes there are a lot of lazy people who can learn and dont. But... To lots of folk these motions with a mouse are difficult, they just don't have the finger dexterity we have. They double click wrong because it's difficult to hold their fingers correctly. Their brains aren't wired for digital instruction. They can put model cars together from thousands of tiny pieces but ask them to go 5 levels deep in an options menu and their brains just can't process the virtual file cabinet necessary to do so. Some are lazy, but we cant ignore that we were raised with skills to make this easy. They weren't. 
1
iko-01 7 hr ago +1
I could see that argument maybe in the 2000s, not anymore lol come on now. The youngest millennials is now 30 years old. We were literally brought up on Windows XP, MySpace, Facebook, forums, mobile phones etc. and if they're the ones having kids and are struggling to control their kids activities, I gotta say that's a user issue at that point.
1
soerenL 7 hr ago +1
It’s easy for kids to circumvent some of the control mechanisms. It’s easy for a parent to think he/she has setup parental controls in a meaningful way, without realizing that their kid has access to apps/services they explicitly blocked. The shit can be hacked by a 9 year old.
1
Theemuts 8 hr ago +1
Ok, let's keep doing the exact same thing that doesn't work then. I'm sure the system will magically correct itself by next Friday.
1
Kandiru 8 hr ago +1
There are issues with it though. I set up a whitelist for URLs on a tablet and included one specific YouTube video. But after going to that page you could still click through to any of the suggested videos afterwards indefinitely as YouTube doesn't actually load any new URLs after the first one. There are lots of design issues like this, where websites break the expected behaviour by auto-playing new content, which breaks parental controls.
1
Aggressive_Noise6426 8 hr ago +1
Parent here and I’m not trying to make excuses at all and I’d like to say I’m tech savy but shit is hard. Speaking specifically from an Apple family the type of parental locks needed for my family in particular isn’t available on Apple products. I can set up some many things, I can set up shortcuts, I can set up screen time locks, I can set up passcodes, and I can even download 3rd party apps that promise to lock down what I need.  They all never work fully and when they do work my daughter (who is autistic/adhd) will brute force the f*** out of it and by pass everything! She always will find a way into the settings of an app then click on links in the help section or the faq section then it’ll take her online.  With Apple products she eventually learned that if you cut off the tablet/phone and turn it back on it will at one point turn back on without the restrictions. Apple also won’t let you block access to settings which I get but still annoying.  We ended up getting her an Amazon Fire which has tons of restrictions that Apple doesn’t have. BUT if you input the wrong pin to the adult account enough it’ll ask you if you want to reset pin. She can click yes and now she has access to parent profile. She also knows that just like with iPads if she restarts the tablet once it dies it’ll boot back up in parent mode.  In case you are reading this like “well take the tablet away” it’s not that simple and also she has a van pick her up from school as the first stop and the last stop. Her school is 1 hour away and she gets bored enough she will be destructive.  The point is it’s not 100% the parents fault and we are trying our best but we were all kids at one point and we know that we always figured out ways around things. 
1
syn4pt1c1983 9 hr ago +1
I swear to god… modern day parents who keep saying this are some lazy fucks. Yes, I‘m an IT guy, so there’s been zero issues with this for me for about 10 years, but even my sister who would ask constant questions about MS Word as soon as she has to write a formal letter for once has managed to restrict her kids‘ tablets and the older one‘s smartphone. Whoever says that they need to be „tech savvy“ in order to put working restrictions in place in 2026 is either a colossal idiot who can’t even follow a detailed video guide on YT or is a lazy f*** who really shouldn’t be parenting kids - or both. 
1
Hellohibbs 8 hr ago +1
You don’t even have to follow a YouTube video. ScreenTime literally walks you through it step by step.
1
Teadrunkest 8 hr ago +1
I mean, it’s not really that hard to get around most blocks and restrictions. “Just ban it” always makes me laugh. It works in literally nothing else but you think it would work here?
1
SatyricalEve 8 hr ago +1
Just because some kids might figure it out a way around it doesn't mean it isn't worth trying.
1
Teadrunkest 8 hr ago +1
Sure, but it’s absolutely hilarious to me that a generation that grew up doing shit in secret on the Internet and bypassing controls is now shaming parents for not being able to stop their kids from doing shit on the Internet in secret and bypassing controls. Because it *IS* difficult to make a foolproof block system and it’s easier than ever to just google ways to get around it or find a friend who isn’t restricted who will let your child use their devices.
1
PhantasmologicalAnus 8 hr ago +1
I'm tired of these people and their laziness/uselessness making it harder for the rest of us. If enough parents like this one whine, they'll make controls even stricter for all the people that don't need them and don't want them. We need to stop catering to the lowest common denominator and let them flail.
1
Protoavis 9 hr ago +1
"unless you are tech savvy and on top of all the parental controls, " aka "too hard to fulfil the current requirements of being a parent and I have no interest in educating myself, woo is me"
1
misterkalazar 8 hr ago +1
And these parents will blame their children and government and service provider and next door neighbor before they own up and take responsibility for their child's Social anxiety, attention deficiency and other much more dangerous consequences that started because they took the easy route of keeping kids distracted with unsupervised access to the internet.
1
Hellohibbs 8 hr ago +1
Woo!
1
Beor_The_Old 7 hr ago +1
lol I think you mean woe but the next time I get excited I’m definitely going to say woo is me
1
Hellohibbs 8 hr ago +1
Tech savvy? iPhone PCs are the easiest thing in the world to set up. It’s designed so someone with an IQ of 70 could do it.
1
OrganicMechanicTTV 9 hr ago +7
I use Google's family link. It's free and very user friendly. It takes a modicum of effort, really no excuse. I can't speak for Apple products as I've never owned an iPhone.
7
Additional-Can9184 8 hr ago +1
Easily done from the iPhone directly. No 3rd party app required.
1
the_amatuer_ 9 hr ago +1
I also have never owned an iPhone. I have nothing to add to the conversation, just like to tell people randomly.
1
beetrox8 8 hr ago +1
I found your post to be mildly interesting. Thanks.
1
Randommaggy 8 hr ago +1
I use both platform and tested both sets of parental controls. They are both simple to set up super strict or super lax and both get a 6/10 score with different deficiencies from my rounds evaluating them since setting up a balanced path that grows with your child sucks in both. I settled on Google family link and a Lenovo Y700 Gen 2 for my daughter since it's easier to get close to the usage pattern I want to allow/encourage without micromanaging everything with how my kid behaves and their personality. I also test out every single app that gets installed before it gets installed. She has access to the play store and can wishlist apps that she would like to try out.
1
Randommaggy 8 hr ago +1
We could/should set up parental control "drop-in clinics"
1
HisRoyal_Badness 8 hr ago +1
It takes abiut 5 minutes of googling to know how to block websites in yoir home network and on your child's devices.
1
rnzz 8 hr ago +1
parents have never been able to know everything kids are doing.  in the days before gps tracking and mobile phones, we had kids going to soccer matches or the mall or their friends places, and we trusted them to come home before dinner was ready.  there was no way for anyone to know anything that wad actually happening. there were rules that would ban them from going to clubs and buying alcohol, and while wouldn't stop kids completely, they clearly signalled it's not something you're meant to do. at the end of the day, good parenting is ultimately what would guide kids to know the right thing to do.
1
Mieche78 8 hr ago +1
Aren't there phones designed for kids that can still call and text but don't have all the bells and whistles?
1
Fresh_Individual5500 9 hr ago +43
Parents have to parent, parents say it’s ’impossible’.
43
constanzabestest 9 hr ago +1
"Hey we're both irresponsible with barely any money to maintain ourselves Let's have kids together" Fast forward few years... "What? What do you mean i have to look after my kids? I have a life you know! I'll just give the kid a tablet it'll be fine"
1
Anotherthrowblanket 8 hr ago +1
Big tech has to be socially responsible, big tech says it's "impossible."
1
idryss_m 8 hr ago +1
Think we all said this as soon as it was announced. Nice idea, stupid to think it would work. Social media companies have zero consequences applied for law breaking. Parents don't want to tell their kids no and are often clueless around technology, which for a generation that spans the analogue and digital age crossover, is pretty incomprehensible to me. I propose we just ban Meta, X, Truth etc until such time as society collapses.
1
Educational-Art-8515 9 hr ago +1
Australian here. The problem is that the parents blame social media companies when their child easily bypasses the restriction or just starts using unregulated foreign services. It's easier to finger point at the government and social media companies than, well, be an actual parent.
1
warlordcs 8 hr ago +1
i still point my finger at the media company. they put a lot of effort into making the service addictive. and honestly social media does not really contribute much value into society. it causes a lot more problems then it solves.
1
Niasssssseeeeeee 9 hr ago +1
Nothing has really changed, parents used to let their kids out all day and night. The worst thing is, I don’t know which is more dangerous. Out all day and night or online 24/7
1
tismij 9 hr ago +1
Easy online 24/7 is way more harmfull.
1
twowholebeefpatties 9 hr ago +1
I’m a parent. And I get this low hanging fruit approach. But it’s f****** hard swimming against this current.
1
jesonnier1 9 hr ago +1
It isnt. Blocking sites takes literal minutes. 
1
xxandl 9 hr ago +1
I'd guess he means that it is hard to enforce things other parents aren't. It's only easy unless you actually raise a teenager...
1
warlordcs 8 hr ago +1
not to mention that its also an arms race. try to block something and they will try to circumvent it ....repeat
1
indeedy71 8 hr ago +1
That’s never going to change though. The only actual thing you can do is give your kids some credit that they might understand certain restrictions even if it’s not what their peers have. That goes for absolutely everything in parenting, if you feel particularly helpless when it comes to social media it might just be that it’s an area you need to learn more about before you do the exact same thing you do with everything.
1
xxandl 8 hr ago +1
That's unfortunately just not true. They connect with their friends over social media, they get their news via social media, they get the squads and dates for their next football game via social media, they need it for research, they need it for their summer jobs,... So no, banning social media is not the exact same thing as everything else. This is a generation that is way more online, which can't surprise us with them being home so often during Covid years.
1
twowholebeefpatties 8 hr ago +1
You’re spot on. But you’re likely arguing with people that don’t have kids, or people who have already raised their kids.
1
misinformedcapybara 9 hr ago +1
kids get around blocks so easy. it does nothing
1
xParesh 8 hr ago +1
Back in my day, parents bought a playstation as their kids baby-sitter. These days it's cellphones with social media apps
1
dontknowshiitake 8 hr ago +1
I agree absolutely as a teacher and a parent. But some basic barriers that don’t involve me having to be the bad guy would be nice too. Oh wait, $1500 phones solves that problem 👍
1
Puzzleheaded_Loss770 9 hr ago +1
Yeah i really dont understand the issue. Just be a f****** parent and dont let the kids have these apps. I have 4 high school aged kids. this shits not that hard
1
Complete-Sort1617 9 hr ago +99
We’re about to witness a massive uptick of “identity fraud” as teens everywhere discover they can create their instagram accounts by stealing their parents ID for account creation.
99
StaticSystemShock 9 hr ago +59
And massive identity theft because we'll all be required to upload our IDs to incpetent 3rd parties to verify we're adults to access shit online. It's already happening and it will just get even worse.
59
Complete-Sort1617 9 hr ago +20
Yup, it’s going to be an absolute f****** nightmare.
20
StaticSystemShock 8 hr ago +1
Everything about this verification is designed so dumb and backwards and just calls for identity theft and abuse all while not protecting kids at all. It'll just give corporations even more of our biometric data.
1
PhantasmologicalAnus 8 hr ago +1
Yep. Using someone else's network just got a whole lot more attractive.
1
Killboypowerhed 9 hr ago +1
My kids don't have social media because I told them they're not allowed it. It's not impossible
1
oeioe 8 hr ago +1
My parents told me I wasn’t allowed to drink or smoke. Anyway, I started drinking at 14 and smoking at 15. 
1
Melodic-Appeal7390 8 hr ago +1
Oh boy, who’s gonna tell him…
1
ZookeepergameOwn1726 8 hr ago +1
I'm a year 6 teacher. I have several students who genuinely don't have social media because their parents don't allow it. You can also tell from their vocabulary and attention span that they do not spend all day scrolling. Acting like parents are foolish for parenting is not helping.
1
clinicalia 8 hr ago +1
I don't understand why this is so hard to do? Like why do parents struggle with this c***? Even when I was a kid, my parents did nothing to stop me from using the internet all the time. They only cared when we were still on crappy AOL dial-up and when they needed to use the phone. I saw and got into so much awful junk online because they just never cared. Starting to make me think most people just aren't mature enough to have kids.
1
applejuicerules 8 hr ago +1
> Starting to make me think most people just aren’t mature enough to have kids. *Starting* to?
1
Ver_Ama 8 hr ago +1
“But then I’ll have to spend actual time with my child.”
1
localstyle808 9 hr ago +1
Weak parents will end up destroying society and the world.
1
Sleepgolfer 8 hr ago +1
Almost right! Actually it's megacorporations making their products highly addictive on purpose without regard for the wellbeing of consumers
1
DevilDjinn 8 hr ago +1
It's both.
1
bulbouscorm 7 hr ago +1
At a certain point you're responsible for defending yourself against the Digital Heroin Nexus
1
AscendedViking7 8 hr ago +1
Yupp
1
ExReey 8 hr ago +1
*social media
1
Melonfrog 8 hr ago +1
Even worse, the universe probably
1
pkennedy 9 hr ago +16
Seems ok, ban brought down usage 40% on the low side and up to 80% on the high side for some studies. A solid start. Like with all bans, it just takes time for the majority to accept it and abide by it. I look at smoking, it took many years before the older childen to leave the schools and take with them their habits, making it less appealing for the younger ones as the numbers dwindled. Parents now have a better stick to work with, it's the law... it's not just my rule you can't use it. For some, they need extra help and this does it. Society plays a good part in raising children. Society provide schools, health care, and protection for children and parents do their part, a solid majority but thinking society isn't involved or responsible at all is ridiculous.
16
SuckerSlutter 8 hr ago +1
Do you know where you saw these stats? I am curious to read up about it myself.
1
Hypo_Mix 7 hr ago +1
Yeah it's BS. It was something like a survey of people who were already installing blocking software or something. There is no real data other than social media sites saying "we blocked x accounts" without actually knowing if they were under 16 and if they signed up under fake ages. 
1
Brushner 8 hr ago +1
Seems like the [opposite](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/apr/01/australia-teen-social-media-ban-criticism). 7 in 10 still widely use social media and the longer the ban stays flopping the more ineffective it gets as peer pressure and FOMO seeps in.
1
Donut497 9 hr ago +1
Who’s desperate for mass surveillance? Because that’s what a “youth ban” is. We will all be subject to personal identification on the internet. 
1
mechalenchon 8 hr ago +1
Social media is mass surveillance. But private.
1
CouchPoturtle 8 hr ago +1
People with smart phones full of third party apps and tech services that they sign up to willingly but still think they are somehow private or living “off-grid” are hilarious.
1
mechalenchon 8 hr ago +1
I prefer my mass surveillance feeding my future AI replacement thx. Much more ethical than the government finding out... check notes... my age! The horror.
1
CaRzOonn 9 hr ago +1
Banning it won’t fix the underlying issue, people will just move to the next thing.
1
Infini-Bus 8 hr ago +1
Stop giving those kids smartphones!  From what I can tell, parents nor the kids are subject to any enforcement.  It's all on the industry - and we know how industry likes to follow laws. 
1
ashtonpar 8 hr ago +1
Those parents were hacking their way through the internet - I’m almost 38 and I remember getting into my schools entire registry and into a back way of using MSN messenger, and I wasn’t even a computer dork just knew how to go down folders and clicked around. When a kid wants something, they’ll find a way. Just morons my age got to teach their kids what to look out for, or don’t. We all gotta make mistakes and learn from them as we grow up from youth to adulthood
1
Wondering_Electron 8 hr ago +1
It is f****** easy as a parent. Our daughter was just given her first phone and use Pinwheel.
1
Wheels9690 8 hr ago +1
Nothing pisses me off more than lazy, shitty parents. "Why doesn't the government do more to protect our kids online!" Because its not their f****** job. So many parents(not all) are f****** worthless and should never have had kids if they are too f****** lazy to monitor what they do online and who they talk with. Now we have to deal with shit like Discord and f****** Xbox needing ID verification for the sake of "protecting children"
1
Jonn_1 9 hr ago +9
How about a smartphone ban?
9
Happy_Feet333 9 hr ago +1
Just ban the apps from being downloaded from the app stores for any Google/Apple account that is for someone who is a child. Kids, nowadays, are too stupid to know how to access these sites without an app. \--- I mean, just look at the number of comments on topics like YouTube, when Google raises the price of the ad-free subscription version. 90% of the comments are gripes, obviously. But there will only be a handful of commenters saying how the subscription is completely unnecessary, because you can watch YouTube on Firefox, ad-free, if you have an adblocker extension. And that works on mobile devices. Even those that respond say such a thing is just "too difficult" and that "the app is easier" to justify the continued use of it. So the proof is already out there. People won't switch to browser-based social media, because "It R teh HARD!!!"
1
tb5841 8 hr ago +1
Fairly easy to open the app store, click 'switch account' and change to a non-child account. It's also incredibly easy to make a google acvount that says you're any age you like, so having access to a non-child account is not hard.
1
warlordcs 8 hr ago +1
the kids all use revanced
1
WreckaStow7779311 8 hr ago +1
And even now it is being phased out by a newer thing! Morphe (look it up) is the better Revanced nowadays. Less buggy, and it features a lot of ex-Revanced devs that felt the Revanced leader was too difficult to deal with - he later full on copy and pasted code from Morphe and the current versions are super buggy
1
Happy_Feet333 8 hr ago +1
Another app... under Google/Apple's control. You kinda prove my point. You can't even consider any other way to watch YouTube, except via an app. It's a completely foreign concept to you.
1
WreckaStow7779311 8 hr ago +1
That is a lot of assumptions my guy. My reply wasn't even to you, idk why you are coming at me assuming all that (incorrectly) Calm down. My reply was just mentioning to that specific person, there is a better alternative to app patching Youtube if a person is interested in going down that route - wanting to let the people who do shoutout Revanced know there is a better thing out there for that specific type of YT usage Who said that the concept if using Firefox on a mobile device with an ad blocker is completely foreign to me? I grew up long before smart phones anyways Like idk man your reply seems odd and weirdly misplaced
1
Happy_Feet333 8 hr ago +1
Which is STILL an app. Which Google/Apple can restrict. Sure, if you're on an Android phone, you can side-load it, if you know how... but even that is going away soon.
1
denartes 8 hr ago +1
Side loading isnt going away.
1
Happy_Feet333 8 hr ago +1
It's going away unless you know how to access the developer settings on your phone... or you jailbreak it. [https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/android-phones/google-wont-kill-sideloading-on-android-but-it-will-add-some-more-hoops-to-jump-through-and-thats-a-good-thing](https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/android-phones/google-wont-kill-sideloading-on-android-but-it-will-add-some-more-hoops-to-jump-through-and-thats-a-good-thing)
1
denartes 8 hr ago +1
So side loading isn't going away.
1
Happy_Feet333 8 hr ago +1
It is... for those that don't know how to access developer options or how to jailbreak their phone. Which covers that vast majority of Android users. As for Apple users, it's NEVER been an option.
1
warlordcs 8 hr ago +1
my point was that kids are actually very smart. actually any people that are poor, restricted, or bored are capable of great feats of ingenuity. they will endure a lot to make a thing they want to happen happen. sure kids today dont know how to operate a rotary phone or a swiss army can opener, but me now in my 40s doesnt know how to make a minecraft mod
1
Happy_Feet333 8 hr ago +1
Then ask them. Ask them to show you how they access their social media. Then ask them if there is any other way to (without prompting). And how they'd go about learning other ways to do so. \--- Because the vast majority will say that the apps ARE how you access those sites. And that the way they'd learn new ways to access their favorite social media would be via social media, not webpages like wikiHow, blogs, or news sites. Meaning that once the apps get restricted, they don't know how to access social media... or even how to learn new ways to do so.
1
Teadrunkest 8 hr ago +1
Kids are not that dumb, man.
1
WreckaStow7779311 8 hr ago +1
Just like how people my age found little tricks to get around school computer lab browser blocks to play games, kids will adapt and discover a "browser and add on" trick if it comes down to it These comments of yours are really dumbing down the discourse with blanket statements that don't seem based in much beyond "kids nowadays are dumb"
1
Happy_Feet333 8 hr ago +1
If that were true, the paid "ad-free" version of YouTube wouldn't be anywhere near as popular as it is. Because, you know, people "will adapt and discover a 'browser and add on' trick". But, like my original post shows... PEOPLE AREN'T. And kids are people, you know, you can't exclude them from how people aren't discovering a "browser and add on" trick. And of those that do hear about it, how they ignore the option.
1
bwoah07_gp2 8 hr ago +1
And I say it's an incredibly stupid idea for world governments to impose social media bans on teens.
1
thegamenerd 8 hr ago +1
How about actually parenting your children? Don't want them on social media? Block it on their phone. Set up parental controls. It's not hard but it requires you to actually try. It's like when my brother kept complaining about his girlfriend's son using his credit card on buying shit, I basically had to twist his arm to get him to admit to setting up parental controls on his Xbox. I had to set it up for him because he wouldn't do it himself and sure enough, his girlfriend's son stopped buying shit.
1
mqrdesign 9 hr ago +1
Kids nowadays are tech savvy and are aware of work arounds for accessing these things despite the ban.
1
superbabe69 9 hr ago +1
Big throw from Murphy missed
1
Crisis88 8 hr ago +1
I think the phrase is "difficult", not impossible
1
RAdu2005FTW 8 hr ago +1
Parental controls have been a thing for decades. How are these parents so technically illiterate?
1
ShakeMyHeadSadly 8 hr ago +1
The social media company said it would investigate, but would not inform Ms Williams of the outcome, "to protect the privacy of the account holder". Oh, sure. NOW they are concerned with account holder privacy.
1
NUMBerONEisFIRST 8 hr ago +1
They are just using children as an excuse to better track what people say online. If they cared about children, why would they continue to cut food stamps, welfare, and other social safety net programs while also bombing schools in Iran, and not investigating the children abused or murdered at Epstein island. I'm so tired of their lies.
1
tinylittlebabyjesus 7 hr ago +1
My issue with these laws aimed at age verification for social media is that they just seem like convenient ways for politicians and government to package bills that are covertly aimed at reducing the anonymity of the internet. That said.. If it weren't for the potential impact it could have in other areas, it doesn't sound like a bad idea.
1
SpartanKane 8 hr ago +1
I think that with social media, you really cant put that genie back in the bottle. Its been around so long and is so ingrained in the lives of the youth, that kids will find a way to skirt the restrictions. No, parents should just be better. If this was around 10 years ago, it wouldve probably landed.
1
BrandonianBranflakes 9 hr ago +1
Where will I get my fart content fill??
1
MaestroLogical 8 hr ago +1
We fine/arrest parents that give alcohol or cigarettes to kids and this is seen as a perfectly acceptable way of preventing addiction issues. If social media poses the same addiction risks...
1
CapriSonnet 8 hr ago +1
Bring back dial up.
1
go_go_tindero 9 hr ago +1
Just because a ban isn't perfect, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented.
1
← Back to Board