· 78 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 17, 2026 at 6:11 AM

Device found near Bali and Lombok identified as Chinese undersea monitoring system

Posted by malcolm58


Chinese device found in strategic waters near Bali identified
www.abc.net.au
Chinese device found in strategic waters near Bali identified
A large torpedo-shaped device discovered near an island in a strategically important strait between Bali and Lombok has been identified by defence analysts as a Chinese undersea monitoring system.

🚩 Report this post

78 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
TheFrenchSavage Apr 17, 2026 +1748
>Beijing has dismissed concerns, saying, "there is no need for excessive interpretation or suspicion". Well that makes me want to investigate it even more!
1748
Zwangsjacke Apr 17, 2026 +421
>Beijing has dismissed concerns, saying, "there is no need for excessive interpretation or suspicion". Just the normal amount.
421
PM_Me-Your_Freckles Apr 18, 2026 +7
Possibly just a "Yep, it's exactly what it looks like. Don't over think it, because you are already correct."
7
_spec_tre Apr 17, 2026 +209
The lack of the usual combative wording does show just how guilty they are this time
209
Suspicious_Place1270 Apr 17, 2026 +87
yeah, it's like: oh well, you got us there (pwease leave it where you found it uWu)
87
BestFriendWatermelon Apr 17, 2026 +39
"there is no need to start digging up the patio in my back garden..."
39
ozthinker Apr 17, 2026 +83
Objectively, if China had wanted to obscure or obfuscate its origin, it would have not printed the organisation logo and the Chinese words on it.
83
MikeAppleTree Apr 17, 2026 +50
It’s like “weather balloons”, if it’s obviously monitoring you want it to seem innocuous, so having commercial labels and temperature and pressure sensors provides plausible deniability.
50
ghostchihuahua Apr 17, 2026 +26
Denied as confirmation is just good old USSR/CHINA modus operandi re- communication around such things. It was always such a mention, they’re in fact a nod that says “yep’, so what now?”
26
8muLH Apr 17, 2026 +579
There's a whole lot of them deployed around Australia now after the Chinese Navy's recent trip.
579
MajesticBread9147 Apr 17, 2026 +305
I mean you shouldn't doubt that any world power isn't doing clandestine shit. Like how the fact that a few Navy Seals illegally entered North Korea and killed a few civilians after being spooked or America spread memes in Muslim majority nations about how the Chinese Covid vaccine contained pork products, and don't get me started on Russian propaganda in America and the EU. Geopolitics is an international p**** game where everyone is cheating.
305
Good_Restaurant15 Apr 17, 2026 +169
> and don't get me started on Russian propaganda in America and the EU. No, Do get started. We absolutely need to bring up, more often, how Trump is a Russian asset, and has been for decades. Even if you are tired of talking about Russian bots in social media, the fact that Trump bankrupted a series of casinos that had Russian capital all over it, and still does business with those same Russians, should be notable.
169
radicalelation Apr 17, 2026 +6
> and don't get me started on Russian propaganda in America and the EU Facilitated by the same wealthy Americans that are running the US. Russia utilized Cambridge Analytica, which is often attributed to Steve Bannon and not his handlers, the Mercer family. They not only have been working on extracting and leveraging data for political purposes since the early 90s through their SCL Group, but Rebekah Mercer was placed on the board of the Heritage Foundation in 2014, just before Cambridge Analytica really spun up. Heritage was operating in Russia shortly after the Soviet Union collapsed, with an office in Moscow and all, with regular meetings with government leadership. Granted, Putin came into power under an anti-reformist banner, but that means trusting Putin to be sincere for power, and the constant crossing with Heritage or linked people is suspicious. Heck, the Heritage-owned Reagan administration had Oliver North take the fall for the Iran-Contra affair, and he ends up heading the NRA when they were investigated and found to be a Russian asset. There's a chance that Russia was a modern prototype for what the wealth and race supremacists have been attempting to establish in the USA, desired since the failing of the Business Plot (Prescott Bush, who approached Smedley Butler to replace FDR as a fascist dictator, is a direct thread to Heritage through HW).
6
karny90 Apr 17, 2026 +8
The problem is that most Americans don’t know or even understand half of what you said. It’s so over their heads that they’ll hand-wave it away. Especially now with “fake news” being so popular. I genuinely dont know how we can get regular, everyday people to understand what’s going on.
8
Ez13zie Apr 17, 2026 +4
You should read The CIA as Organized Crime by Douglas Valentine.
4
8muLH Apr 17, 2026 +1
Who would be stupid enough to think they weren't?
1
maejsh Apr 18, 2026
Most Americans it would seem.
0
ponylicious Apr 17, 2026 +217
How are these systems powered? Battery?
217
Wafflars Apr 17, 2026 +378
Well I highly doubt it’s 3 tiny Chinese inside using pedals to generate power. But could be wrong.
378
InstantShiningWizard Apr 17, 2026 +55
That's how they got Harold Holt, you can never be sure
55
FfflapJjjack Apr 17, 2026 +26
Ah yes, the ONLY alternative.
26
a1b3c3d7 Apr 17, 2026 +17
I love how that's the only alternative, it's either a battery or 3 small Chinese dudes 😂
17
auxaperture Apr 18, 2026 +2
Yeah I mean it could just be 2 dudes. So silly.
2
TendyHunter Apr 17, 2026 +1
I just hope the dudes won't be too quick to resort to battery
1
a1b3c3d7 Apr 18, 2026 +1
One should not underestimate the power of 3 small chinese dudes peddling 😂
1
OhMyDoT Apr 17, 2026 +19
It’s China, might well be 3 Uyghurs in there
19
ah_no_wah Apr 17, 2026 +3
It could also be Wong
3
musiccman2020 Apr 17, 2026 +4
Wong ?
4
Darkskynet Apr 17, 2026 +66
Some of the old ones back in the day would use the magnetic fields from the copper cables to power the device if I remember correctly and didn’t even need to cut into the wire to listen to the signals. They used the same principles that caused crosstalk in undersea telephone cables. There are some interesting videos on YouTube about some of the devices that have been attached to cables over the years to spy on communications.
66
Low_Search_6667 Apr 17, 2026 +19
Are any of the "cables" still electric (copper)? I thought they'd all be digital fiber optic now. Makes me wonder how you spy on fiber optic cable. Gotta splice in i guess
19
norcalscan Apr 17, 2026 +14
The way they were doing it in the Snowden leak days was bending the fiber enough where it keeps the circuit intact so no alarms go off with a temporary outage, but the light hits the bend hard enough where enough light leaks through and a receiver placed at the bend can pick it up. That’s the ELI5 for sure there’s a lot more to it
14
Low_Search_6667 Apr 17, 2026 +3
Thank you!
3
BannedSvenhoek86 Apr 17, 2026 +1
Light bleed through an undersea cable??
1
Skiddywinks Apr 17, 2026 +2
Yeh I'm unconvinced but also too lazy to care 
2
norcalscan Apr 18, 2026 +3
Now that I’m wide awake and done with the day, I understand why y’all are unconvinced. The cable bend was absolutely done above ground in ATT central offices etc. I doubt the same can be done with undersea cables without bringing the cable into a submersible, bust through armored cable with power embedded to get to the glass, do the bending and then encapsulate the whole “new” contraption to protect it from the “elements.” Sorry, my earlier post was pre-morning-coffee. Carry on. :)
3
PhilosopherFLX Apr 17, 2026 +7
Still carry power as you need a fiber repeater every 60 kilometers.
7
Darkskynet Apr 17, 2026 +2
Unsure how it’s done in modern times, my information is probably out of date. But lots of the old communication cables are still being used, but for different stuff now. The old telephone cables are mostly likely all data now. But I’ve no idea.
2
Interesting_Pen_167 Apr 17, 2026 +2
They are still copper because you can't make an electromagnet out of fiber.
2
Low_Search_6667 Apr 17, 2026 +2
Please explain,  I don't follow 
2
Interesting_Pen_167 Apr 17, 2026 +1
The magnets in the detectors need to be tuned precisely and be powerful to do be able to interact with/detect stuff. Regular magnets are just, well magnets. But if you wrap a coil of conductive material like copper wire around a magnet and send voltage through the circuit the magnet you can essentially up and down the magnetic strength and go beyond the normal potential of the magnet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amp%C3%A8re%27s_circuital_law It's also worth noting that fiber optic cables are for transmitting data, not power. Those devices are sending data so it's possible they are connected via fiber to send out the actual data saying whether they detected something or not. However it's also possible they just collect the data and a submarine comes by and retrieves the data later on. EDIT: I noticed you mentioned spicing in above, I find this topic fascinating plus I'm an electrician so it's super interesting but check out the USS Jimmy Carter. It's a spy submarine that the Americans have and supposedly it has some technology that allows it to do just that, splice into fiber optic cables. This is technology that is supposedly impossible if you talk to technicians about this stuff but there are enough documents released that it seems like that's exactly what they are doing.
1
Low_Search_6667 Apr 18, 2026 +1
I mean, you gotta be able to splice it because it could get damaged at some point (intentionally or unintentionally). Splicing fiber has always been a thing.
1
Interesting_Pen_167 Apr 18, 2026 +1
I'm meant splicing without being detected sorry I wasn't clear there.
1
Low_Search_6667 Apr 18, 2026 +1
Yeah, I wouldn't know about the undetected part. I did a 1st level computer networking class over a decade ago. I vaguely remember different copper and fiber methods for detecting faults and latency and distances between.  If I had to guess, I'd say a splice in fiber, mid way between boost station would require some sort of active manipulation of the signal going both ways to render the splice invisible.  Otherwise the repeater nodes seem the ideal places to access the data undetected 
1
i_sell_you_lies Apr 17, 2026 +1
Not with that attitude!
1
luksfuks Apr 17, 2026 +2
That would explain how it can gather information for a long time. But how does it communicate its findings back to the owner?
2
FabulousSOB Apr 17, 2026 +7
They followed the charger cable to China, that's how they found the owner.
7
SVXfiles Apr 17, 2026 +8
Just a micro use cable with a shit ton of 3-6ft extenders all wrapped in saran wrap
8
ProtonPizza Apr 17, 2026 -5
RTG if I had to guess.
-5
BestFriendWatermelon Apr 17, 2026 +13
It's definitely not RTG. You've been playing too much Kerbal Space Program. RTGs are expensive and give off only a tiny amount of power, and there are half a dozen better ways of generating power under the sea that also don't cause a radiation hazard with the political fallout that creates. RTGs are only really for deep space missions. A huge bank of batteries are the most obvious choice. Depending on depth, solar or tidal power will also do the job very well.
13
ProtonPizza Apr 17, 2026 +4
You are correct in that I did play too much KSP back in the day.
4
Interesting_Pen_167 Apr 17, 2026 +56
I've read military analysts talk about devices like these, as they have gotten more sophisticated people are believing that there will come a time probably within some of our lifetimes that the entire ocean will be monitored and subs may become impossible to hide. There are also techniques using lasers which can penetrate deep into the ocean which are fired from aircraft which can scan areas. Interesting race because this could neuter the nuclear triad approach to defense.
56
Foe117 Apr 17, 2026 +28
In the US, that's what sosus nets are for. As for lasers detecting submarines, as touted as the "Guardian" project, it's a fantasy project and likely only has a real detection range of 150 meters or less, ocean water turbidity notwithstanding. The US is also doing the same thing, but their scope is more realistic in detecting ships within the 200meter euphotic zone.
28
Interesting_Pen_167 Apr 17, 2026
What you're saying about the lasers detection range seems to ring true based on my knowledge of things but I did see the Chinese have similar planes running these things and I have to wonder if both countries are doing it and it's useless, why keep doing it? My gut feeling is you're right though it's probably nearly pointless but they are testing it anyways.
0
Foe117 Apr 17, 2026 +6
useful against drug submarine I suppose
6
SaintsNoah14 Apr 18, 2026 +1
Water is really f****** dense man. There really is a ceiling (floor?) to detection
1
Thanks_Ollie Apr 17, 2026 +6
That leg of the triad will then move into space! It will be great, no issues whatsoever!
6
UnknownHero2 Apr 18, 2026 +1
Well no, it definitely wouldn't neuter the triad. The literal entire point of the triad is that it resists technology changes like this. Even if every sub instantly becomes useless the US could just use icbms or traditional bombers. You would need new technologies to be developed and deployed capable of disabling each threat simultaneously. The ones this would destabilize are countries like the UK who only have sub based nukes.
1
gwentlarry Apr 17, 2026 +174
I don't suppose it's anything unusual. I would expect as well as China, the USA, Russia and a number of other countries have similar devices in place around the world.
174
ElusiveGuy Apr 17, 2026 +54
[SOSUS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS) has existed for the better part of a century. It'd be silly to not expect rivals to do similar things. 
54
Oldiebones Apr 17, 2026 +13
Yeah we’ve had submarines and satellites all over the place for decades. This isn’t anything new.
13
n05h Apr 17, 2026 +6
Yeah, Philippines is probably like “first time?”.
6
LeviAEthan512 Apr 17, 2026 -2
You know what? Good. I fear China and I live in a small country that would end up in their sphere. Well rather I fear living under CCP censorship, but that's a digression. I say good because we don't live in a perfect world. People are going to fight. And when the missiles start flying, I don't want my country to be under fog of war.
-2
alitayy Apr 17, 2026 +1
What country are you talking about
1
LeviAEthan512 Apr 18, 2026
All of them, especially China. I want them all to know what's going on so they don't just start blasting blindly
0
alitayy Apr 18, 2026 +1
No mate what country are you living in
1
LeviAEthan512 Apr 18, 2026 +3
Singapore. Our position is worryingly strategically advantageous.
3
QuasarPulsar17 Apr 17, 2026 +13
Call for Garbage collection!
13
echoron Apr 17, 2026 +36
I dont think PPL have a slightest idea what is China doing all around the world behind the curtains, and im afraid once we find out, it will be already too late...
36
Mindless-Peak-1687 Apr 17, 2026 +6
It seems the intelligence service is so secret it has no name.
6
leaderofstars Apr 17, 2026 +1
They are trying to find more fishing spots to overfish at
1
StickAFork Apr 17, 2026 +3
"Pay no attention to the torpedo behind the curtain!"
3
karateninjazombie Apr 17, 2026
The yanks have definitely done this to russian undersea cables in the past. The one I read about was somewhere in the north coast of Russia. Was a sub insertion in the 60s with divers going to and from the sub. Sketchy as f*** and very nearly got caught iirc.
0
AnthillOmbudsman Apr 17, 2026 +2
There is a whole book from the 1980s about the operation, interesting read. It was in the Okhotsk Sea off Kamchatka.
2
karateninjazombie Apr 17, 2026 +1
That is the one I think I was reading about. Though possibly the Wikipedia or some other internet artical on an mil enthusiast site
1
Alienhaslanded Apr 17, 2026 +1
It kind of looks like a side scan of some sort but it's not.
1
mark6059 Apr 18, 2026 +1
would be terrible if any of the ip or data related to the device were accidentally became available on the internet
1
mldqj Apr 17, 2026 -5
If this was a U.S. undersea monitoring system, would it have made the news at all?
-5
termites2 Apr 17, 2026 +1
It did back in the 1980s. I guess it's just so well known about nowadays that it's not news any more.
1
← Back to Board