This is more directed at people who were alive when it came out. I feel like a lot of Italian-American people hold this movie as a point of pride, even though it's about a bunch of criminals. I'm curious if, at the time, it was seen as a positive or negative for the Italian-American community.
Movies about shitty people tend to be the most entertaining (The Wolf of Wall Street). Do you think Coppola was trying to glorify, or vilify?
I’m a little late to be able to speak about the reaction in the day, but I grew up in a large Italian-American family in the decade following.
My family (AFAIK) never had any ties, but of course they were close enough to the immigrant communities to have heard plenty of stories. I don’t think any if it was surprising and I don’t think anybody was laboring under the impression that it wasn’t romanticized.
Also, I don’t think you could say that Italian-Americans, as a whole, had any common reaction to it. Some thought it was a beautiful film, some were very offended by it. I wouldn’t try to put percentages on that, but I feel like I’ve met and heard from people with a wide range of reactions. What I do remember everybody VERY much appreciating was the opening wedding sequence, and how genuine that felt to them in a way they’d never seen their community depicted in film. (Not the behind the scenes meeting, but the actual wedding celebration, I mean.)
Regarding the “pride” you mention, I think that’s not an inapt observation, but I think it had more to do with the filmmakers and actors than the subject. DeNiro (in Part 2) and Pacino and Coppola were freaking icons. So I think it was more pride in the community for producing artists who made this incredible work of art. But as always, no group is a monolith. I’m sure opinions varied.
Edit: I didn't state this clearly. As pointed out below, these fellows weren't big names at the time of the first film's release. I intended to refer to how many regarded them with pride in the wake of the Godfather.
528
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+55
My buddy's uncle was Italian, and he was someone who HATED, "The Sopranos."
Said it made Italians look bad, and glamorized organized crime.
As a young adult, it sort of did for me, but as I got older, and truly paid attention to the show, you recognize how these people were true pieces of shit, and how low class they were.
55
DottsteriskMar 23, 2026
+50
I don’t know how anyone can watch The Sopranos and think it’s glamorizing the life.
50
surnik22Mar 23, 2026
+53
You ever eat high quality deli meat out of a fridge while wearing a robe? That’s the good life and I won’t be convinced otherwise
53
FudgeAllOfYousMar 23, 2026
+6
the gabagool?
6
DottsteriskMar 23, 2026
+4
Oh, no *doubt.*
Tony should’ve done more of that and less being a neurotic d*****.
And would having some high quality bread on hand be too much to ask?
4
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+11
Well, as a teen, I saw the suits, and e******, but I didn't see how truly broke they were, how they spent the money as quickly as they made it.
11
DottsteriskMar 23, 2026
+3
Sorry, I meant more your buddy’s uncle.
You were just a kid.
3
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+2
Trust me, he was pretty militant with his hatred towards the show.
2
CronoDroidMar 23, 2026
+8
It does but it also doesn't. It wouldn't be an effective story if it didn't show the "good" and the bad, but I think the creators do expect the audience to step back and see that all the power, wealth and pleasure experienced by these gangsters come at the expense of other people. They're killers, thieves, liars, criminals. One of the episodes that I think highlights the message is the one where Melfi gets raped, and you want her to tell Tony because you know her attacker would get chopped up real nice. But that would be a validation of the Mafia and their power, so it creates an interesting dynamic where the audience is in awe of the mob and what they can do but hopefully understand that they are still dangerous criminals that plague the rest of society, and that should not be celebrated.
8
DottsteriskMar 23, 2026
+6
Plenty of episodes also show even the higher-ups to be petty dumbasses and insecure and paranoid hypocrites.
Tony, Chris, Paulie, Big P****, Silvio, Ralph, Junior, Vito, Richie… Did *any* of them really come across as cool or glamorous or even particularly intelligent or competent?
It seemed more like most of them were flailing and failing the majority of the time.
6
CronoDroidMar 23, 2026
+8
Absolutely, but as you well know, a significant portion of the audience celebrates ignorance and violence as long as the people behind it are men's men and present a tough outer image. In Goodfellas, everyone loves that prison cooking scene but when you take a step back, these are full grown adults, in prison for stupid, immature nonsense. Yeah they're living better than the other prisoners but wouldn't you rather be free, eating steak and lobster and Sunday Gravy and making money legitimately?
In real life they really are like that, there's a former mobster Michael Franzese who does a lot of videos about the Mafia and he's always banging on about his genius scheme to "defraud the federal government of gasoline taxes" like it's some sort of noteworthy achievement. He got sent up to state and federal prison for it so it wasn't that f****** smart was it.
8
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+10
Michael Franzese is full of shit, constantly talking about how "back in his day," they watched out for the neighborhood, weren't racist, and had nothing to do with drugs....
As for Goodfellas, they had to change so much from actual life, with the movie.
That scene in prison where they were treated like royalty didn't even happen.
10
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+6
Tony was no Michael Corlogne, he was more like George Costanza, constantly throwing temper tantrums, and his underlings were morons, constantly screwing things up.
6
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+3
I think he caught one of the episodes, the one where Ralph kills Traci and was sickened by it.
But that was the whole point of the show, you sometimes needed an episode like that to bring the audience back to reality, that these guys were complete monsters.
3
profane_vitiateMar 23, 2026
+5
> these people were true pieces of shit
The entire show is a study in idiotically stupid toxic masculinity. That's, like, the whole point.
5
snipawolfMar 23, 2026
+2
There is a character who makes this complaint in the show
2
cornucopia090139Mar 24, 2026
+2
Funny, because none of them in the sopranos are really “itallian”, they’re New Jersey itallian. That fact gets brought up a ton, especially during the Columbus Day episode where Tony freaks out on sil for getting offended by the protests, and even more so when majority of the guys didn’t like Italy when they went and were very happy to be back in Jersey. I never took glamorization from the sopranos, I felt they did a good job at making the people and the life feel terrible and awful and evil.
Some people are like that, my uncle is a devout catholic and he absolutely abhors “The Davinci Code•
2
ShouldveFundedTeslaMar 23, 2026
+99
This was the exact response I was looking for. Thank you. I love this kind of perspective. Also, I'm sorry to generalize about all Italian Americans, I didn't mean to do that. I'm just so curious how nationality defining American films affect people
of that nationality.
99
DmnklyMar 23, 2026
+66
Oh, it's not a problem at all, I wasn't trying to chide you. Just trying to make it clear that I'm not purporting to speak for all Italian-Americans or anything like that :-)
It's always frustrating to me when somebody says, "I'm X and X people don't think that." Yeah, actually, some of them probably do!
66
gaquaMar 23, 2026
+7
Pacino was pretty much an unknown before The Godfather, in films at least. And while Coppola had won an Oscar for the script for Patton, neither of them were big enough to “put butts in seats” at the time.
The Godfather launched them both into the stratosphere.
7
DottsteriskMar 23, 2026
+7
Yeah, but they became iconic almost *instantly* and the hype narrative was perfect: some exciting new scrappy Italian filmmakers bursting on the scene with both an “authentic” and mythic portrayal of the Italian-American experience, all wrapped up in a Shakespearean crime drama.
And a lot of folks thought Brando was Italian too, on account of the vowel.
As a narrative, it came perfect and pre-packaged for the audience to latch onto.
7
mnmkdcMar 23, 2026
+17
The older generations in my family were in the mob and all of them liked the mob movies. This was when they were much older though and probably hadn’t been directly affiliated in decades. I’m a lot younger than the Godfather movies though, so I have no idea what they thought around the time of release
17
OK-Greg-7Mar 23, 2026
+15
DeNiro and Pacino were definitely not icons when the film came out. In fact, Pacino was so unknown Coppola had to fight to have him included in the movie at all. He was constantly on the verge of being fired until the diner scene.
OP should watch the series The Offer. It's all about the making of the movie and really well done.
15
DmnklyMar 23, 2026
+6
This is true. I meant in the wake of the film, not when it was released.
6
bigolfisheyMar 23, 2026
+312
My understanding has always been that while The Godfather did use already established terminology, the book and films actually influenced real-life mobster behavior.
The mob liked that the public found the style of mafia presented in the films romantic, so they adjusted their behavior accordingly- at least to some degree.
312
ApprehensiveSecret50Mar 23, 2026
+126
The were selling heroin/drugs well before the Godfather…
126
SchwarzFledermausMar 23, 2026
+123
For real. Most of the people in the show Boardwalk Empire were real people, and a lot of the plotlines were adapted from real shit that went down in the 1920's.
123
Fishb20Mar 23, 2026
+151
There's an old joke that in the godfather they say the mob doesn't sell drugs because theyre too honorable but in real life the mob didn't realize they could sell drugs until they watched the godfather
151
fat-boy-rickMar 23, 2026
+120
Mob connected traffickers were deep into the heroin business for at least two decades before the godfather 1 (released in 70s) but the whole drug conflict in the movie reflected actual policies set in the 60s by the ny bosses to ban their members from selling drugs (policies that were sometimes ignored but sometimes viciously enforced)
120
OperationMobocracyMar 23, 2026
+62
It’s a major part of the narrative in Goodfellas. Henry Hill gets a pass on moving drugs in prison but keeps doing it after even when Paulie presses him on not doing it and it helps lead to Henry’s arrest.
But the mob and heroin go way back to Arnold Rothstein in the 1920s.
62
CaptrikerMar 23, 2026
+47
I know it’s an innocent typo or autocorrect, but now I picture a film called “Goodfellows” where everyone looks, talks, and dresses like British gentlemen.
“Be a good chap and get me a cocktail Arachnid.”
“I do say, get your own you scallywag!”
“Oh ho! He has certainly gotten your follybotter Thomas!
BLAM!!
“ by Jove! You’ve killed Arachnid!”
47
pantstoaknifefight2Mar 23, 2026
+29
"Pray, by what wit am I deemed whimsical? Is my countenance but a painted mask of a jester? Doth my very soul serve as thy plaything to fetch a hollow laugh? Expound, I charge thee—how am I merry?"
29
CaptrikerMar 23, 2026
+11
“William Shakespeare’s: O’Fellow.”
11
pantstoaknifefight2Mar 23, 2026
+6
Dost thou truly believe I would fashion a life from the threads of green-eyed jealousy? To wax and wane alongside the fickle moon, forever birthing fresh suspicions from the void?
Nay, for the Fates have dealt a meaner hand: I am but an average nobody, destined to endure my remaining days in the skin of a schnook.
6
TheJusticeAvengerMar 23, 2026
+15
_Monty Python's Goodfellas_ is something I didn't know I needed
15
KhamylyonMar 23, 2026
+7
"I am your Godfather."
"Well I didn't vote for you."
7
Dan_BergMar 23, 2026
+7
We are the Knights Who Say "Fuhgeddaboutit"
7
KhamylyonMar 23, 2026
+3
"You shall bring us.... a CANNOLI!!!"
3
OperationMobocracyMar 23, 2026
+3
I mean it was 3 AM and I am not supposed to be up at 3 AM..
3
OverlookHotelRoom217Mar 23, 2026
+22
Angelo Bruno, no drugs, got bumped (1980) by NY for that old time thinking.
22
Spiritual-Fly8832Mar 23, 2026
+9
Vito Genovese was selling heroin back in the 50s. There's a recent movie with Deniro playing dual roles.
9
Razzler1973Mar 23, 2026
+20
I'm sure I remember reading that prior to Puzo's book and the various mafia films and 'code of silence', mafia types had no issues turning on each other to save their skin
The books and films really altered that aspect
20
InfiniteKincaidMar 23, 2026
+67
This is why I love the Sopranos. Sopranos loved to remind you how ultimately full of shit these guys were.
67
BaronMostazaMar 23, 2026
+36
Petty, gossipy, vindictive, f****** each other over as soon as they can, taking an extra scoop of ice cream to show who's in charge, literally stealing coins from each others pockets, honor and family and all boils down to tantrums and exchanging money, it's incredible.
Love the detail of everyone getting expressions wrong all the time, a lot of what they say is down right stupid when you pay attention but they say it with confidence so it's easy to miss
36
Nice_Marmot_7Mar 23, 2026
+8
I grew up around a lot doctors and people like that and found The Sopranos confusing as a kid. My thought process was “why go through all this stress and violence for relatively little money?”
8
_Sausage_fingersMar 23, 2026
+5
Good fellas too. Jimmy whacked long time associates just so he didn’t have to give them their share of a heist they did, and he was willing to whack his closest friend, and likely his wife, the minute he was looking at drug related time.
5
pine_strawMar 23, 2026
+7
I think the idea that the mafia got more “honorable” after the 1970s due to these films is entirely nonsense. There was an incredible increase in snitching in the 80s and 90s when the hammer came down on them for real.
7
KotlebaMar 23, 2026
+2
They really didn't lmao
2
ImpossibleParfaitMar 23, 2026
+7
This seems like grade A bullshit to me.
7
DottsteriskMar 23, 2026
+6
It’s true but mostly in terms of aesthetics and the affected personality of honorable gentlemen. It’s not like gangsters were taking business tips from the movie.
And we see the same kinda thing today. If someone shows up onscreen as a gangster badass and makes a splash, you’re gonna start seeing actual criminals copying the style.
6
Basis-SomeMar 23, 2026
+26
Al Capone was an international celebrity. Gangster films had been Hollywood bread and butter in the 30s. Noir moved things west but even in the 50s you get Black Hand and the Damned Don’t Cry. I don’t think Godfather revealed or introduced anything.
Godfather’s uniqueness was that it wasn’t a heist film or detective story but instead a family drama in a violent world. Great movie and great book.
You should check out The Offer it covers the production of godfather and is an absolute hoot.
26
Unique-Adagio6368Mar 23, 2026
+322
The mafia stuff was already pretty well-known through newspapers and earlier movies, but Coppola definitely made it look way more glamorous and family-oriented than the reality. My nonno used to complain about how it made every Italian family dinner look suspicious to the neighbors 😂
I think it was more about showing the duality - these guys were ruthless criminals but also had this twisted sense of honor and family loyalty that people found fascinating 🔥
322
Wazula23Mar 23, 2026
+277
Its honestly not an accurate depiction of crime at all. If anything it actually influenced real life gangsters to act more like the movie.
In the real world, these people were honorless scum, happy to r*** and traffic and f*** each other over for even the vague promise of profit. Goodfellas is a more "accurate" vision of Italian crime. It's still heavily fictionalized, but at least it acknowledges that these people were total children. Addicts and murderers and thieves. Godfather is too epic for themes like that.
277
Bobsy932Mar 23, 2026
+115
I remember seeing a documentary about the original and a member of the NYPD or someone who was interviewed said the same thing. He said they started observing mobsters kissing rings of leaders, etc. and other cringey stuff like that.
115
ParsingErrorMar 23, 2026
+107
[Scorcese has said as much in interviews](https://scrapsfromtheloft.com/movies/goodfellas-martin-scorsese-interview-1990-gavin-smith/) that Mean Streets and Goodfellas were intended to be "anthropologic" (portraying what the mafia lifestyle actually was) vs. The Godfather being more like "epic poetry."
The Godfather was also made during a time when the mob wielded more influence and [the Colombo crime family in particular was influencing and interfering with the film's development](https://nypost.com/2023/07/08/the-real-mafia-was-incredibly-involved-in-the-godfather/) until they were convinced by the film's producers that it was going to be a whitewash.
107
Suspicious-Word-7589Mar 23, 2026
+57
Pretty much this. The mob had power to influence the first 2 Godfather films and made sure Coppola didn't make them look too bad, hence why Vito seems almost honourable in both films. Michael is a more complicated character but still positive in their eyes.
Once RICO allowed US law enforcement to crack down, you saw a more realistic portrayal in Scorsese's films. You still see the appeal in that lifestyle but the drawbacks too.
57
Hurdy_Gurdy_Man_84Mar 23, 2026
+36
Vito is very honourable in the book, too. The first two films depict him very faithfully as per the written word.
36
Toby_O_NotobyMar 23, 2026
+29
Donnie Brasco is a better example of what it was like because it was based on the true story of an FBI guy going undercover. Not sure if they kept it in the movie, but in the book, one of the things he finds (absurdly) amazing is how f****** stupid they were about stuff.
Like they'd have a scam going that would get them $10k with maybe a 1% chance of getting caught. Then those exact same guys would try something to get $1k with a 10% chance of being caught. He'd try to talk risk/reward with them, but leaving any amount of money on the table was seen as anathema to their "code".
29
Mst3KgfMar 23, 2026
+9
"Donnie Brasco" also shows what a boring daily grind being in the Mafia tends to be. Much of it is just sitting around talking about what to rob.
9
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+3
The eye opening scene for me with Donnie Brosco, was the scene in the bar, where they were busting open parking meters for quarters.
3
ThreehundredsixtysixMar 23, 2026
+17
One of the reasons why I love The Sopranos is that there's NO romanticizing. I can't think of any character aside from the therapist who isn't an awful human being.
Maybe Buscemi's character from one of the later seasons. But not really anyone else.
17
dilligaf0220Mar 23, 2026
+15
Psychopaths would be a more accurate description.
15
ShouldveFundedTeslaMar 23, 2026
+35
As much as I really like these movies, I feel like they have driven what people think 'gangsters' should be. People look at Scorsese films as 'how to's' but completely ignore the second act.
35
kevnmartinMar 23, 2026
+34
I read the book when I was in high school. The main thing I took away from it was, the only way out is death. I never wanted anything to do with it.
34
roto_discMar 23, 2026
+38
> The main thing I took away from it was
Not the really detailed sideplot about Sonny's mistress with the gigantic v*****? Because that's the main thing I took away from the book.
38
AnAquaticOwlMar 23, 2026
+15
I thought the issue was that he had a really big d***, so he caused damage to her which she later had to have a surgeon fix?
15
roto_discMar 23, 2026
+25
Almost. Sonny’s d*** was so huge that her giant v***** was the only one that could satisfy him. And then later she hooks up with a plastic surgeon in Vegas who “tightens her up” so she’s not as self conscious about it.
25
whitep77Mar 23, 2026
+4
In the opening scene of the movie, you see his wife talking about his size while he is sneaking away with that mistress. Also, unless I am mistaken, she had a kid with Sonny who was played by Andy Garcia in the third movie. Which would make him and Sofia's character cousins who end up sleeping together.
4
jtl909Mar 23, 2026
+3
So wise!
3
ShouldveFundedTeslaMar 23, 2026
+9
Thank god. The world wouldn't have been a safe place with Kevin Martin The Kid
9
onetruepurpleMar 23, 2026
+2
I read this in Ray Liotta's narrator voice
2
Prize-Temporary4159Mar 23, 2026
+11
Donnie Brasco was it for me
11
ShouldveFundedTeslaMar 23, 2026
+6
Shitty people are more interesting than boring/normal people
6
Prize-Temporary4159Mar 23, 2026
+5
Eh. Different protagonists, but the same motifs. Specifically, was it possible to survive their sense of duty- and if they did, was it worth it.
5
opinion_aidedMar 23, 2026
+3
You’re over-focusing on the “shitty people” and forgetting that it’s the drama people want to see, and flawed characters have more opportunity for drama in a story.
3
Geth_Mar 23, 2026
+28
Yeah. Scorsese movies are supposed to be warnings, showing how people are "seduced" into this type of life and then he slowly but surely pulls away the glamour to reveal what it really is. GoodFellas, The Wolf of Wall Street---even movies like Wall St, or Heat--it's like, this generation aren't seeing these as warning stories, but something like aspirational.
[Vince Gilligan, writer of Breaking Bad, actually urged writers to go back to writing good guys ](https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/breaking-bad-creator-vince-gilligan-good-guys-walter-white-1236309604/)because the messaging has been lost and bad guys are now aspirational for a new generation.
28
cubitoaequetMar 23, 2026
+13
I think Mean Streets is way more effective at depicting how fucked up it all is. No glamour in getting shot up by a loan shark because of your dipshit punk friend.
13
escapingfromelbaMar 23, 2026
+4
The whole film shows how sordid everything is at the street level. Admittedly NY in that era was like that in just how run down lots of places were, but their lives are in effect surrounded by shabby poverty where different people at the bottom of the food chain are like parasites drawing on other people on that position it's all grubby and just getting by. Even the uncle who by their standards is the person at the top isn't exactly that far out of it really.
A great film even if you just watch the background.
4
Live_Angle4621Mar 23, 2026
+7
To me I am confused what looks so appealing about the movies to some people. You can be close to your family and move to Italy or whatever rather than going into gangs
7
PolygonManMar 23, 2026
+9
I've always thought Goodfellas was the better film by miles.
Not necessarily in terms of artistry, acting or technical achievement, but when you're telling stories about reality, how honest your work is f****** matters. The Godfather is like copaganda for mobsters. Mobaganda I guess.
9
JasonPandirasMar 23, 2026
+5
>If anything it actually influenced real life gangsters to act more like the movie.
For real, like the whole entire trope of mob bosses in suits came about because the first act of The Godfather is during a wedding so all the Corleones are stuck wearing tuxedos for a while.
5
xoogl3Mar 23, 2026
+54
Coppola \*had\* to sanitize and glamorize the original story. Godfather, the novel, was a huge hit already. It had a lot more brutal violence and crime than the movie. The actual mob didn't like it one bit and threatened to kill the producer (Al Ruddy) if the movie was made. Al did a lot of behind the scenes wrangling and made a deal with Jo Colombo, boss of the Colombo family, that the movie will never utter the word "Mafia" (which wasn't a big part of the script anyway) and wouldn't show the mafia in an overly negative light. Coppola understood the assignment and ended up making a masterpiece while keeping with the spirit of the deal.
54
prodicellMar 23, 2026
+21
If you're basing this on "The Offer", it is based on "the memoirs of Al Ruddy" and he is also a producer on the series. Besides Evans' book, they don't seem to have used other sources to verify these stories of Ruddy telling stories about how Ruddy saved The Godfather and made all the right calls. Plenty of people who were around were not asked for their input, and some of these Ruddy tales seem ludicrous to most.
21
xoogl3Mar 23, 2026
+3
Yeah I understand that the story of the making of the Godfather is mostly told from the PoV of Robert Evans and Al Ruddy and they're made to look better than they probably were. But the fact that the mob was dead set against letting the movie be made and they had a lot of power, specially in New York to stop production is undisputed. The deal between Al Ruddy and Colombo is a matter of public record too since the media actually reported on it at the time.
3
Useful_Respect3339Mar 23, 2026
+2
Most of it is true.
The Italian American Civil Rights League, led by Joe Colombo, had a huge influence and political power.
The Mafia controlled most of the trade unions in the United States at one point. Trucking, shipping, construction.
2
WonderflashMar 23, 2026
+3
Isn’t the whole genre borne out of this duality? See Goodfellas, The Sopranos… The Godfather invented this sub genre, no?
3
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+2
Exactly, you never saw Michael or Vito swear, cheat on their wife, do drugs, or even get drunk.
In reality, these guys had horrible family lives, slept with numerous women, indulged in the finest of liquor and foods, etc.
2
Ready_Corgi462Mar 23, 2026
+90
My Grandfather (italian immigrant) found it to be a negative depiction due to the association of Italian people with the mob which is a negative stereotype. And he is right. I don’t have any mobsters in my family, but even growing up in the 2000s people would ask me if I did. I don’t think they really realized that they were asking me if my family are criminals.
However, I personally appreciate seeing Vito come to America in Part II, pass through Ellis Island and settle in an Italian neighborhood in NYC because that part actually was representative of the experiences of the other side of my family (also Italian descent but it was my great grandparents who came over.) I also appreciate that Coppola had the characters speaking Sicilian and not standard Italian. That’s what my family spoke, including my grandfather, and is accurate to what the characters would’ve spoken. It’s not a language featured in Hollywood often, especially back then.
I know my mother, as a child of an Italian immigrant and grandchild of Italian immigrants also appreciated these aspects. She was 16 when it came out and seeing the Corleone kids also being raised in an Italian Immigrant household was reflective of her cultural experience in a time where that wasn’t super frequently seen in a prestige drama.
In short, somewhat complicated feelings. And I don’t think Coppola was aiming to glorify or vilify Italians. He was trying to show both a mobster family and an Italian-American family and what you get with that is inherently these mixed feelings.
90
kneeco28Mar 23, 2026
+38
I wasn't alive then but people def knew of organized Italian crime. Al Capone was incredibly famous during his life, for example. And it was in movies and TV and comics. Even Bugs Bunny quarreled with Capone codded gangsters.
38
CptPatchesMar 23, 2026
+9
iirc Puzo interviewed real-life mobsters while writing the novel, which is why it treats the mafia pretty glowingly. The sharply-dressed gentleman gangsters who have strict codes of family and tradition were essentially a product of mafia PR, and the tracksuit wearing buffoons from something like *The Sopranos* were more in line with how the average criminal organization actually operates.
9
Fishb20Mar 23, 2026
+20
For a modern comparison to how the public viewed the mafia before the release of the godfather, think about something like drug cartels now. Your average joe american knows they exist and they're bad news, probably doesn't encounter them on a day to day basis, and probably has a variety of stereotypes around them, some of which have unfortunate racist connotations. They're kind of go-to villains for TV shows/pulp stories but the stories rarely focus on them exclusively.
I doubt it would ever happen now for a variety of reasons, but the godfather would be like if there was a new movie that was both a huge celebration of mexican-american culture but also a huge English language narco film
20
phantom-under-groundMar 23, 2026
+9
This comparison is so deep, especially if you remember that Italians weren’t considered as fully white back then
9
noteasybeincheesyMar 23, 2026
+3
I mean, you're basically describing Narcos in the second paragraph (not Mexican but Colombian in the original series obviously).
3
KingdeInterwebsMar 23, 2026
+21
Al Capone is probably still the most famous criminal in America.
21
single_again999Mar 23, 2026
+4
Mario Puzo's novel simply put a spotlight on something most people already knew was a thing, especially people who grew up in NY & NJ between the 1890s and the 1980s (ish).
4
TwoToneMoonstone_Mar 23, 2026
+24
The Godfather was made in 72’ so just as the mafia was exiting its heyday. It would be the equivalent of making a film about gangbanging in the 90’s now.
There was still a lot of conspiracies surrounding the mafia at the time (IE. they killed Kennedy) and they still had a strong foothold, but mob movies had been popular all the way back in the 30’s.
It’s what the kids would call nostalgia slop now.
24
Spiritual-Fly8832Mar 23, 2026
+8
No the mob were at their peak in the early 70s. Their fall began in the mid 80s and continued on throughout the 90s and into the early 2000s when the boss of Bonnano crime family himself became an informant.
8
RexMcBadge1977Mar 23, 2026
+4
Just as the Mafia was exiting its heyday? What? The Five Families — Genovese, Gambino, Lucchese, Bonanno, and Colombo — were operating in New York up through the ‘80s!
4
gomxMar 23, 2026
+32
RICO act was 1970, then Pistone/Brasco in the late 70's. Commission Trial in '85 was basically the death knell, so yeah, it's definitely fair to say that the early 70's was the end of the mobs heyday. Can't imagine anyone seriously disagreeing with that. The Mob's peak is pretty widely considered to be some point between Prohibition and the 60's.
32
fat-boy-rickMar 23, 2026
+3
I’d seriously disagree with that and I think many who study the American Mafia as a hobby would as well. Posting in the Mafia subreddit may lead to a good debate on this topic.
I shared some other datapoints in other comments but just responding to some of yours … rico was created in 1970 but was not used against major mob figures until the 80s. Pistons was collecting evidence in the late 70s but the bonnano family didn’t face the consequences of that until the early 80s (and his testimony didn’t affect the other 4 ny families in a major way). Agree that commission trial was a huge event but it wasn’t the death knell - the most powerful nyc boss (the chin) wasn’t indicted in that trial and remained on the street until the 90s.
The windows case (early 90s) which took down the chin was more of the death knell IMO but didn’t receive as much publicity as the commission trial bc John Gotti was getting all the attention from the media at that time.
3
RexMcBadge1977Mar 23, 2026
+4
That’s so silly. The big wave of convictions was between 1984-88. Look at the level of crime in NYC in the ‘70s. Sure, efforts started in the early ‘70s, but the heyday continued for years after.
4
dilligaf0220Mar 23, 2026
+11
The peak of the Mafia in the US can actually be traced to a single date, November 14, 1957.
That's the date when NY State Police roadblocked and raided Joe Barbara's estate in Apalachin NY during an international mafioso summit meeting. After that even J Edgar Hoover had to admit there was a national organized crime syndicate.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apalachin\_meeting#](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apalachin_meeting#)
11
fat-boy-rickMar 23, 2026
+3
That day certainly was important but saying it’s the peak of the mobs power doesn’t reflect how many massively profitable rackets (the Vegas skim, control of the teamsters) that peaked in the 60s and 70s or the role of the mob in major us events (bay of pigs, Hoffa murder, supposedly JFK) that also offered after 1957z
3
gomxMar 23, 2026
+12
What do you define as a “heyday?”
12
Live_Angle4621Mar 23, 2026
+3
If lot of them were convicted it’s no longer their peak or heyday.
3
Spiritual-Fly8832Mar 23, 2026
+3
Gotti and Gigante both got taken down in the early 90s.
3
BubbaTeeMar 23, 2026
+10
>Just as the Mafia was exiting its heyday?
The heyday of the Mafia was the 1950s. It was in decline by the 70s, and then decimated in the 80s. The Valachi hearings and the Appalachia raid both happened in the late 50s, which put a ton of heat on the mob. Previously, the Hoover FBI had largely ignored them, claiming there was no Mafia.
Then in 1959 Batista was overthrown in Cuba by Castro and the communists, essentially cutting off both the Mafia's expansion and escape plans at the knees. They had invested tens of millions of dollars into Cuba (equivalent to hundreds of millions, adjusted to 2026 inflation), all of which was instantly wiped out.
That's what The Godfather shows. Vito represents the apex of Mafia power and influence in America, and Michael reflects its decline.
Vito has a loving family, Michael can't even keep his own family together - both his crime family (Tessio betrays him, Pentangeli turns state's evidence) and his actual family (Kay). Or in an instance of both: Fredo. Michael's inability to hold his actual family together mirrors his inability to hold his mob family together. As Vito says early in the 1st movie: "A man who doesn't spend time with his family can never be a real man."
>The Five Families — Genovese, Gambino, Lucchese, Bonanno, and Colombo — were operating in New York up through the ‘80s
Notice how all those guys were gone by the 80s?
The loss of that foundational leadership - and its replacement by idiot narcissists like John Gotti - was a huge part of the Mafia's decline.
10
fat-boy-rickMar 23, 2026
+3
Most mob historians would not say that the bosses after whom those 5 families were named necessarily represented the peak of h the mobs power (as reflected in scale of rackets or street presence). The names just reflect the names the FBI used - which remained fixed based on the bosses named by Joe Valachi’s testimony in the late 50s.
Vito Genovese’s successors such as Benny Squint and the Chin are widely considered to have brought the family into greater power and wealth than Genovese himself. Bonnano was banished from NYC for a failed power grab and similarly lad successors that were more well regarded than him. Lucchese is more of a mixed opinion, but I’d say Tony Ducks (late 70s and 80s) was equally or slightly more influential in that family’s history.
Gambino’s successors were certainly much worse bosses. But Gotti only took power in ‘85; castellano was a flawed but fairly non idiotic boss. Colombo family has always been a mess bc of internal wars, but that was true under Joe Colombo too (who was seen as sort of the Gotti of his era for starting th e Italian American Civil Rights league and going on tv).
3
fat-boy-rickMar 23, 2026
+4
The mob had tremendous power over many legitimate industries and continued to kill with impunity well into the 80s. The commission trial of 1985 and then the wave of convictions after were the real start of the decline. Early/mid 90s were when the real “decimation” occured, and even that is not 100% true as the 5 families in nyc remain active.
Nothing tremendously damaging occurred to the mob in the 70s apart from the pistone infiltration (which really came to trial in the 80s) and that only affected one of the 5 families. There were some internal power struggles in the 70s and some of the small city families aged out of relevance but in terms of money, number of members, and capacity for violence the NY families remained as strong as they were before (just with a new generation of leadership)
4
fullmoon63Mar 23, 2026
+4
A lot of the mob imagery already existed before The Godfather came out. There were earlier gangster films and real headlines about the mafia, so it wasn’t totally new. What Francis Ford Coppola really did was humanize those characters and present that world in a much more cinematic, almost mythic way, which is probably why it had such a huge cultural impact.
4
wondersnickersMar 23, 2026
+6
If you want a movie that exposed mafia behavior and changed society, watch "Minbo No Onna", it's a pretty unique Japanese movie, that made fun of the Yakuza and exposed their tactics.
It was right on a cultural shift against the Yakuza in Japan and many believe that this movie was the driving factor.
The writer and director Jûzô Itami died as a consequence of making this movie (staged suicide) and I'd I remember correctly he already survived a knife attack.
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0104874/
6
AintEverLuckyMar 23, 2026
+6
> Or was it more based on pre-existing stereotypes?
I think it was more based on the novel by Mario Puzo 🤔
Now whether Puzo drew on stereotypes may be a fair question. But neither Coppola nor Puzo or even Martin Scorsese invented Al Capone, Lucky Luciano, Carlo Gambino, etc etc 😏 They were all real & were really were Italian American
6
Mundane-Dare-2980Mar 23, 2026
+7
No it wasn’t new. People were aware of the mob. It was a part of American culture for the decades that are being depicted. Some of the traditions and codes may not have been as commonly understood as they are now, of course. But people were aware, and stereotypes definitely existed.
7
guinnypigMar 23, 2026
+3
In my part of Illinois, the mob was well known waaaaaaay before The Godfather. Al Capone was all over down here.
3
dilligaf0220Mar 23, 2026
+3
My fav cigar bar in Milwaukee used to be one of Frank Capone's brothels. 🤣
3
sanjuro_kurosawaMar 23, 2026
+3
I'm not Italian but I grew in one of the most Italian neighborhoods, the Bronx. I remember asking my mother to explain why our neighbor had a custom bumper sticker that said, "Mafia Staff Car".
While there were other mob movies which ranged from clownish thugs to realistic stories, The Godfather is also an immigrant story, particularly in the continuation, Godfather 2. Combine that with the best people in movies, it was going to be a crowd pleaser.
America does celebrate criminals; from the Boston Tea Party to Jesse James to Tony Montana. The Corelones were the anti-heroes. They took advantage of corruption as opposed to letting it destroy them. They maintained a level of honor while the story avoided they doing anything destructive. We never saw them strong arm innocent people or engage in drug dealing or prostitution. That's not how real life mobsters operate.
3
SDL68Mar 23, 2026
+3
Mafia exists today. It's not a badge of honor.
3
Trike117Mar 23, 2026
+15
No, people knew. Italians weren’t liked, at all. Think of all the anti-immigrant nonsense these days and turn it up a few notches. Every Catholic Church in America has a “multipurpose room” in the basement. Those were built specifically to keep the dirty Eye-talians away from the nice Irish girls, by making the immigrants go to mass in the basement. (Joke’s on them: my Italian-American father married my Irish-American mother, a story that is *very* common. Robert De Niro is mostly Irish, for instance.)
Once entertainers and sports figures became famous, things started turning around in public perception, but there were always whispers that every Italian was mob-connected. Guys like Frank Sinatra definitely were, and I suspect Dean Martin was, as well.
As Richard Pryor once joked, “It’s not true that all Italians are in the Mafia. They all *work* for the Mafia, though.”
15
bakgwailoMar 23, 2026
+4
You act as if the Irish weren't treated as bad or worse. Now their kids/grand kids/etc continue the tradition against the current immigrant generation. Xenophobia: the real American past time.
4
AngusLynch09Mar 23, 2026
+11
Scarface came out in 1932.
11
LittleSquegeeMar 23, 2026
+5
i don’t think he was trying to glorify or vilify to be honest. i think he just found something unique to make a great film about.
5
Mingyurfan108Mar 23, 2026
+10
He was adapting a novel written a few years earlier. (1969)
10
DrwsCorner2Mar 23, 2026
+5
Vilify-glory, can’t it be both? The story is based on the book by Mario Puzo, not the director’s adapted screenplay. Director merely captured what the author wrote about the mob. Best to find interviews with the author for the original perspective. Don’t forget, there were actual hearings on organized crime with the mob as the prime subject.
5
RexMcBadge1977Mar 23, 2026
+7
The screenplay was written by Coppola AND Puzo.
7
MovieENT1Mar 23, 2026
+3
Everyone should watch *The Offer* on Paramount+ it’s a phenomenal series on all this stuff
3
ShouldveFundedTeslaMar 23, 2026
+2
It can def be both (and I think that's what makes it great). But that doesn't mean that the directors image is the same as the authors.
2
cire1184Mar 23, 2026
+5
Screenplay was literally written by Coppola and Puzo.
5
bbbbbbbb678Mar 23, 2026
+5
The national crime syndicate was sort of denied openly by the government until at least Appalachia which was busted on a local level.
5
peachy_moonwhisper_1Mar 23, 2026
+2
It didn’t invent the idea, but it 100% shaped how people visualize it. Like when people think “mafia,” they’re basically picturing scenes from that movie
2
tzatzikidipmademefatMar 23, 2026
+2
My grandmother, an Italian-American from Jersey, enjoyed the film. I feel like aspects of it were nostalgic for her and she enjoyed translating any Italian spoken in the film. That being said, we did have relatives affiliated with the Mafia, though she did not speak highly of them and disapproved, however, it being her uncle, her father, despite having disputes with his brother who was involved in some way, to the point of the most petty last name change I've ever heard of its hilarious, never did quite cut him off.
It led to interesting stories though, she always told me about how she met Lucky Luciano as a young girl and how he was the most intimidating person she had ever met. He came into her uncle's (I'm assuming deli) one winter in his big fur coat and bought her an ice cream.
At one point my grandfather relocated the family to a southern state where he was originally from. He was a merchant marine, so he was gone for up to 6 months at a time. So that, combined with his mysterious absence, an Italian American family from up north in the south, being Catholics (and I'm sure the Lincoln they drove didn't help matters) led to rumors of my grandfather being in the Mafia that led to a fair bit of discrimination, which persisted until even I was in highschool.
2
HardSteelRainMar 23, 2026
+2
I was 12 when it came out and those stereotypes were well-known.....having an Italian last name I heard my share as a kid
2
RedditNomad7Mar 23, 2026
+2
Like most movies about organized crime, it gave more romance and glory to that world than it deserved.
I was alive at the time, and some groups came out against it because of that, saying bluntly it both gave Italians a bad name AND made that whole world look more enticing than it was. It definitely seemed to shape the public’s view of Italians for years afterwards, with a lot of people seeming to believe that all Italians in the US were somehow linked to the Mafia. From what I remember, for every Italian in the US who kind of embraced it, a couple more didn’t like its influence.
2
garlicroastedpotatoMar 23, 2026
+2
Very much pre-existing beliefs. There was a lot of racism and bigotry towards Italians due to the oft association with organized crime. And you know Italian American filmmaker he drew inspiration for that story from somewhere. And when they were filming the mafia was on set they actually were worried that some of the plot lines were too similar. They full on became worried the film would expose them.
2
dilligaf0220Mar 23, 2026
+3
Robert F. Kennedy's personal one man vendetta against organized crime and his Congressional hearings in the early 60's brought to light the Cosa Nostra at a national level. The Godfather (book & movie) exploited this newfound attention.
It is generally frowned upon by Italian-Americans that are over 30 and have stopped bullshitting about having an Uncle that is "connected".
The Godfather is also about as accurate on the Cosa Nostra, as Apocalypse Now is on Vietnam. Which is to say, sensationalized bullshit with no connection to reality. Great movies, but a 1/10 on accuracy of subject matter.
3
DmnklyMar 23, 2026
+3
"...sensationalized bullshit with no connection to reality..."
Well, are they factually accurate portrayals? No, of course not. But sometimes good fiction means being loose with the truth to get at the Truth, if you take my meaning. I don't see that as a bad thing.
3
soft_starpetunia_72Mar 23, 2026
+3
Organized crime was already in the public consciousness, but The Godfather made it feel almost… noble? Which is kind of wild.
3
SnakeEater14Mar 23, 2026
+3
This is a more interesting question than most of the answers you’re getting (sadly).
The American Mafia had a very complicated public perception throughout the 20th century, going through varying levels of publicity and riding waves of notoriety. As a rule, “the Mafia” wasn’t referred to as such and the idea of it being a mass coordinated network wasn’t entertained until the Kennedy administration. Up until that point, the public had only a hazy perception that there were Italian gangs, the same way there were Irish gangs, or Jewish gangs, or any other type of minority organized crime. Films about gangs were a mainstay from the 30s on, and everyone knew who Al Capone was, but that’s different from what we understand the Mafia to mean now.
The idea of *La Cosa Nostra* as we understand it now was deliberately fought against up until the 1960s, both by the Mafia itself, and by J. Edgar Hoover, who considered it a fanciful invention by the press to distract from the real enemy: communists. The Mafia itself would not be acknowledged as a genuine organization until the [Valachi hearings](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valachi_hearings) in 1963, as part of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy’s crusade against organized crime. This was a complete reversal in policy from previous administrations, and was the first time the federal government actually took the Mafia seriously.
By the time The Godfather was released, people knew about “the Mafia”, but it was still a disputed topic. Mafiasos like Joe Colombo claimed the entire idea was based on anti-Italian perception, and was involved with the script-writing process of The Godfather (he would later be gunned down at an Italian Heritage Festival). Mario Puzo received a lot of negative feedback and threats from his fellow Italian-Americans, who believed he was feeding into anti-Italian stereotypes. It took until the 1980s for successful prosecutions of Mafia bosses, and for the American public to finally digest what the Mafia even was. Which meant that The Godfather had a very real, very tangible effect on the American perception of the Mafia, and even the Mafia’s perception of itself.
Source: “The Five Families: The Rise, Decline, and Resurgence of America’s Most Powerful Empire” by Selwyn Raab
3
greggo39Mar 23, 2026
+2
I’ve read this book a couple of times. One of the best and most complete collections about the American mafia.
2
umbly-bumblyMar 23, 2026
+2
Whatever the intent, the effect is to celebrate and glorify. Real-life mob folk love the movie for precisely this reason.
2
Variable_Shaman_3825Mar 23, 2026
+2
The movie was in large part about the Italian immigrants culture and the sense of community and loyalty that comes with it. Michael's dilemma about being torn between his Sicilian heritage and his American upbringing spoke to a lot of children of immigrants who came to country in the post war period.
Also I never felt the movie to be about a bunch of criminals, to me it's the story of about a family who happens to be involved in crime to fulfill their own version of the American dream. The movie even begins with the lines "I believe in America. America had made my fortune."
2
BubbaTeeMar 23, 2026
+3
>The movie even begins with the lines "I believe in America. America had made my fortune."
The guy saying that isn't a mobster, though.
And he's talking about how his faith in America was misplaced, which is why he now has to turn to the mob for Sicilian/true "justice."
Remember, "America" has just let off the 2 guys with just a suspended sentence for beating the shit outta his daughter.
3
joelluberMar 23, 2026
+2
You know the Senate hearings in Godfather Part II? Those are real and happened in 1951–52. That was when "the Mafia" first became a commonly known word.
2
Defiant_Let_268Mar 23, 2026
+1
It's a great epic romance of a movie. I've always felt Scorsese movies are to a degree an anti-dote to Coppola. They're much colder. Reading Alex Perry's The Good Mothers is colder still.
1
tcbericMar 23, 2026
+1
"The Offer" on Paramount+ does a great job on the history behind "The Godfather". 10 eps and very well done.
1
MulliganastyMar 23, 2026
+1
Everyone knew about the mafia. Godfathers are great, great movies but its depiction of organized crime is obviously romanticized.
Scorcese's Goodfellas is much more accurate depiction of what a shit-show it was imo.
1
ToonMasterRaceMar 23, 2026
+1
Cosa Nostra was much more well known to the public at the time of the Godfather's release than it is to modern audiences.
1
winelover08816Mar 23, 2026
+1
Seemed like every Italian guy with a car back in 1970s Brooklyn swapped out their standard horn for one that played the movie’s theme.
1
SuspendedHaloMar 23, 2026
+1
Scarface with Paul Muni 1932 would show mobsters.
1
TulsaOUfanMar 23, 2026
+1
I believe it was the first to romanticize and portray families protecting the family. The splendor and Camelot-like setting made the Mafia cool and almost wholesome.
1
44035Mar 23, 2026
+1
In the movie, they show how the newspapers covered organized crime ("Mobster Shot Outside Restaurant"). So people were aware of the mafia all along, it wasn't exactly a secret.
And then there were the Senate hearings in the 50s and 60s where people saw and heard actual mobsters giving testimony. It kind of fascinated America.
1
Old_Assist_5461Mar 23, 2026
+1
I was around when GF came out. Even as a kid we were well aware of Italian mafioso both in Italy and the US. Al Capone movies were great, events were heavily followed by the news at the time, and the mafia was big in popular culture. This certainly had no impact on myself or my family on how we viewed Italian folks. They were integral to our community just like everyone else. As a teen, they were just more movies to get to go see, nothing unusual. As an adult, watching them several times, I appreciate them more. I agree with another commenter though, I enjoyed Goodfellas even more.
1
snowdennMar 23, 2026
+1
I remember when I was little knowing that it was a gangster movie. But I didn’t really associate it with Italians.
Instead, I associated godfathers with gangsters. I didn’t know what a godfather was and never had one or knew anyone who had one. So as a little kid, I thought it was a sort of rank in the mafia.
So rather than stigmatize Italians as mobsters, for me, the movie stigmatized godfathers as crime bosses.
¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯
1
Vince1080Mar 23, 2026
+1
You have to understand, back in the day, a Don was a respected man in the community, a man who would settle disputes among others in the area, there was no police or any real government involvement. Think of it like the position of a Chief. So that's where the respect comes in.
About doing illegal things this became amplified in the USA and other countries, where there was a lot of wealth, so the position changed with the times.
1
BadIdeaSocietyMar 23, 2026
+1
This was a pre-existing stereotype. Interest in mob fiction and true crime stories go all the way back to the days of newsreels. We don't get the Untouchables TV series or Bugs Bunny shorts with Rocky and Mugsy without that lore being fleshed out
1
ZdzisiuMar 23, 2026
+1
Al Cappone was a celebrity between world wars.
1
bottomMar 23, 2026
+1
Neither. People knew bout the mob.
1
RepulsiveLemon3604Mar 23, 2026
+1
My dad’s side of the family is from Sicily. My great grandfather came over after WWI as a poor laborer. My Great Grandmother came over later once he was “established.” In my family’s situation there was zero appetite for any of that stuff and supposedly my great grandmother was a known vocal opposition to any mafia or crime dealings in her business (store and boarding house). I have a distinct memory of my Great grandfather’s funeral in the late 1980s of there being a little bit of family drama when some of the extended family members were not allowed to be at the post funeral service gathering. The running story is that my great grandmother refused their entry. I feel like probably in most situations and in most cultures there is just going to be a dividing line between certain sects of people and another layer of those who try to achieve power through fear tactics.
1
karmakazi_Mar 23, 2026
+1
People knew about the Italian mafia before the film but I would say the film romanticized the mafia.
1
TurbojellyMar 23, 2026
+1
Watch The Offer, is a story of making The Godfather. Just remeber that films and shows that are based on real life are changed to make better narratives.
1
The_phantom_medicMar 23, 2026
+1
I like to think that The Godfather is a gangster movie that is not really about the Mafia. There was nothing realistic about the mob: I feel like the movie deals more about the passage of time and end of traditions, the way Italian-Americans have integrated into the US, and the fall of the ideals of the American Dream and of man in general.
1
extra_lessMar 23, 2026
+1
Here is Michael Franzese (real big time NY mobster) has to say [https://youtu.be/70rcXfeKoVA?si=izxFZ-QynsOseR60](https://youtu.be/70rcXfeKoVA?si=izxFZ-QynsOseR60)
Great insight from someone who was there.
1
peakedtooearlyMar 23, 2026
+1
I think Al Capone and the gang activity around prohibition first brought the US Mafia into the spotlight.
1
party_shamanMar 23, 2026
+1
The Godfather was a bunch of stuff that Mario Puzo pulled out of his ass. he was a gambler in debt and needed money badly. he did not know anyone in organized crime and used his imagination.
The stereotypes came from the media, including the book and film The Godfather. it’s a case of life imitating art.
1
TheUnknown_GeneralMar 23, 2026
+1
It was all stereotypes. Members of New York's Five Families actually went through the script to make sure that the words "Mafia" and "Cosa Nostra" weren't in it.
1
FlakyAssociation4986Mar 23, 2026
+1
Mario puzo who wrote the godfather book which the movie was based on and was from a totally Italian backround in new york. was in his 30s before he even heard of such a thing as the mafia. Which suggests they did a very good job of keeping it secret.
1
MrJohnnyDangerouslyMar 23, 2026
+1
It was a book first, so attributing the motive entirely to Coppola is a mistake.
1
FuzkerMar 23, 2026
+1
If you haven't seen it. Watch "The Offer" the making of the Godfather. 👍 👍
The Offer - Wikipedia https://share.google/eWHd6nz7HzTN6be98
The only restriction the mafia put on the film was to not use the word mafia. The dude that plays Luca is the real deal.
1
ArkyBeagleMar 23, 2026
+1
Mario Puzo established a newerish genre of fiction. Coppola adapted it successfully. But White Heat and a lot of other gangster movies were around well before; some have compared them to westerns. Westerns are the original film genre.
1
Basic-Vermicelli-223Mar 23, 2026
+1
I know the Italian mafia LOVED the movie, because it presented them almost like royalty. 😂😂😂
1
hamstercasterMar 23, 2026
+1
I’m from an Italian family and the Syndicate, Mafia, Cosa Nostra were discussed regularly in our home. It was a source of pride for my father but not for anyone else. We grew up in the Chicagoland area, so Capone, Bugs Moran, Bugsy Siegel and others were household names.
1
dhriscMar 23, 2026
+1
There was a pretty big public hearing on the mafia in the early 60s. It did a lot to make the mafia public and on TV, radio and newspapers everywhere and I believe helped influence the Godfather novel to be made.
Valachi hearings - Wikipedia https://share.google/LDf2FNwp8J7dHRAST
As a side note, anti-heros and criminals were especially popular figures in fiction in the late 60s and early 70s as an increasingly large portion of the US public no longer trusted authority figures. 1967's Bonnie and Clyde is usually held up as a prime example.
1
kostac600Mar 23, 2026
+1
My dad was a young man of non-Italian immigrant persuasion in the 1940 era and he had a couple of stories of the mob around Chicago from that era. He told one story of a store owner who just refused to pay protection nothing ever happened to him and they told another story of a guy who knew that hung out with another guy and the other guy got killed in drive-by shooting.
1
gaquaMar 23, 2026
+1
There’s a fantastic series you might like called “The Offer” and it’s about the making of The Godfather. It’s Al Ruddy’s story about how the movie got made, and it takes a lot of liberties for the sake of the story, but it IS outstanding and fun, and there are lots of real-life events depicted. Specifically the mob-funded criticism of the film from the Italian-American Civil Rights League.
1
cjf4Mar 23, 2026
+1
it gave the mafia texture, some of reliastic, and a lot of it romanticized. if you look at the mob movies that came before, they are mostly cartoonish.
1
rumplebikeMar 23, 2026
+1
When the movie came out, my mom and dad lived in a basement apartment and their landlord was an immigrant from southern Italy. He hated the film. Thought it made the mob guys look honorable and most were nothing but thugs and murderers.
1
OfAnthonyMar 23, 2026
+1
Of course people knew. In 1950 the US Senate televised the Interstate Commerce Committee and exposed the Italian American Mafia to the American public. The Kefauver Committee.
Even Alfred Hitchcock Presents had an episode on the mob. 'The Day of the Bullet'. Go watch it...' you'll see!'. "You'll see!' "You'll see!....
1
Hairy-Key231Mar 23, 2026
+1
My father's family came to the U.S. in the teens & 20's; he was 9 when his parents immigrated. His mother's brothers & sister & their families all lived around Hoboken. My grandparents ran an Italian grocery/deli, another relative had a tailor shop. Others had jobs in factories & in dressmaker shops & a couple worked in bakeries. None of my relatives were affiliated with the mob, but all of them had contact with the mob through their businesses or personal friends. All of my relatives thought the mobsters were low class thugs that extorted money from the community by "protecting" businesses & sold illegal things like drugs, guns, booze, & prostitutes. A few of them talked about the Godfather movies & thought that the brutality was presented truthfully, but that a lot was presented in a Hollywod way to soften their image. The wedding scene & a lot of the restaurant/food scenes were authentic, too. My father said that, as a boy, he was approached to do some errand type jobs for local guys, but he never took an offer. He wanted to study hard & become a doctor someday & looked down on the local mob guys.
1
yesatMar 23, 2026
+1
https://www.ideastream.org/npr-news/2026-03-16/75-years-ago-a-viral-tv-moment-ignited-americas-obsession-with-the-mafia This happened way before the Godfather.
1
forbeswest2013Mar 23, 2026
+1
Copolla was modernity.
1
Beneficial-Mix9484Mar 23, 2026
+1
No the godfather did not expose people to the world of Italian crime families. There have been movies made about it way further back in time such as Little Caesar with Edward G Robinson in the title role as an Italian American gangster1931 & Scarface (1932 ) with Paul Muni also As an Italian American gangster.
The Godfather came out in 1972 I didn't see it till years later as I was only 12. YO.
Because the Godfather film depicted these mobsters as calm, mostly and family men, It was different. However
I don't really understand it being a sense of pride for Italian Americans. I think just the opposite is true.
The Valachi Papers which is based on a true story of a Italian crime family member who was an informant. I never saw this film either at the time but I do remember the movie poster printed in the newspaper was quite graphic showing a man murdered in a barber chair. This movie also came out in 1972.
Murder Incorporated 1960 starred among other people Peter Falk and that was also based on real people of Italian American crime families and Jewish American crime families.
1
Magicth1ghsMar 23, 2026
+1
I'm more concerned that Coppola's films are taken as aspirational rather than warnings.
1
hotwife423Mar 23, 2026
+1
A/pq
1
TorontoRiderMar 23, 2026
+1
Yeah, no. Italian mobs were featured in many, many movies before The Godfather. It just did it best, by showing it from the "family" side instead of the FBI's.
1
festessMar 23, 2026
+1
For those who say Italian Americans eat smelly cheese and sip cold wine, tell them we're from the land of aromatic Asiago, and supple Barolo.
If they say spaghetti and meatballs, you tell them orechiette with broccoli rabe
If they say John Gotti, you tell them Rudolph Giuliani
1
peteyshabbyMar 23, 2026
+1
the weird inversion is that it probably made real organized crime seem both more glamorous and more structured than it actually was. the myth and the reality ended up feeding each other
1
chx_Mar 23, 2026
+1
Joseph Valachi testified in 1963, watching this on television was when people learned a hell of lot about how the Mafia worked for real. The Godfather came nine years later and there wasn't anything real it would add.
1
lellomackinMar 23, 2026
+1
Ozone Park Residents React to John Gotti's 1992 Conviction | TikTok https://share.google/AnBZEnM28j3tOnSj2
1
RivercitymissMar 23, 2026
+1
Shortly before the Godfather was filmed, the “Italian American Civil Rights League” was founded by Joe Columbo, a real New York mob boss. I seem to remember some protests about the movie during filming because it depicted Italian-Americans in a bad light. Of course, during the 2nd Italian-American day in NYC, somebody shot Columbo 3 times. Oops.
1
Ok_Gift_5526Mar 23, 2026
+1
I think he was using it, as he said, to illustrate the American immigrant experience. I always think about how before The Godfather, there was nothing glamorous about being in the mob. So, I imagine what if Vito was a white supremacist instead and how Michael would want to hide that from Kay.
1
duglarriMar 23, 2026
+1
15 when the movie came out. Italian gangsters was a thing. Lots of gangster movies featuring Italians as the mobsters. It was a staple of cinema. Movies about Al Capone, for example. A lot of it would have been drawn from real life, because a lot of the mobsters did happen to be Italian.
1
Jaxstraw1313Mar 23, 2026
+1
Both.
1
Disastrous-Angle-591Mar 23, 2026
+1
It was based on a famous best selling pulp novel
1
dpeterkMar 24, 2026
+1
I once talked to an Italian woman and she said many ITALIANS in Italy didn't like how the Godfather series portrayed the people as being part of the mob.
1
theoldgirl13Mar 24, 2026
+1
Un nanar … C’est tellement mal fait, caricatural à outrance, ça cabotine à un point … Ne pas m’insulter.
195 Comments