· 106 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 9, 2026 at 2:11 PM

Diddy Appeals Conviction, Says Freak Offs Were Amateur P**** and Protected by 1st Amendment

Posted by cmaia1503


Diddy Appeals Conviction, Says Freak-Offs Were Amateur Porno and Protected by 1st Amendment
TMZ
Diddy Appeals Conviction, Says Freak-Offs Were Amateur Porno and Protected by 1st Amendment
9:22 AM PT -- Arguments have officially ended in Diddy's appeal, and the judges will now begin their decision-making process. During the hearing, Diddy's lawyers mentioned Cassie Ventura's alleged drug use, which they were not allowed to present during the federal trial.

🚩 Report this post

106 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
epicredditdude1 4 days ago +560
If that’s the case why wouldn’t they just present that as their defense in the original trial? This feels like they’re just trying a completely new defense. 
560
Interesting-Value690 3 days ago +94
I'd guess that they didn't use it as a defense in the first trial because it takes money, time and traceable interactions to manufacture false evidence. How much money would it take for you to sign (and back date) a p*** contract for a monster? 
94
soapinthepeehole 3 days ago +10
I thought appeal was only for challenging the legitimacy of the prosecution. I’m not a lawyer but I was under the impression that you can’t just on a new defense when appealing.
10
Dookie-Snuff 3 days ago +1
About a million, I’d say 5 but take a million.
1
Lisan-al-Gaib-65 3 days ago +13
You can't raise new arguments on appeal. This probably was in a pre trial motion to dismiss .
13
MrDerpGently 3 days ago +46
After further consideration, would the court consider a little leniency if most... well, many of the participants were there consensually?
46
SumpCrab 3 days ago +62
"Your honor, the bank robbery was merely a "flash mob" and my co-defendants and I are in an improv troop. Therefore, the charges are improv-able. I rest my case."
62
S3simulation 3 days ago +21
Ah, the “Yes, and…” Defense
21
Theshaggz 3 days ago +6
Only second to the “No, but…” defense
6
baddingo3 3 days ago +3
not a great analogy but i get it.
3
bush_killed_epstein 3 days ago +3
This randomly gave me an idea for a dark comedy/ drama movie: an improv troupe full of troubled but well meaning amateur actors whose “yes ands” gradually get more and more extreme until they end up committing extreme crimes / acts
3
AtBat3 3 days ago +3
Probably went with the Trump method of denying everything about every single charge and that obviously didn’t work
3
ogredmenace 3 days ago +2
So they must have contracts written and signed and by all the consenting people to be filmed in them right!? Everyone involved right!
2
joshspoon 3 days ago +1
Also did he have an o******* and did he pay everyone?
1
vroart 3 days ago +1
Cause such a mess that trump has to swoop in and make it about himself and then say “I too was a victim of the weaponized New York justice system!”
1
JustToyingAround73 3 days ago +169
I used to work on the p*** industry. At no time ever did we feel it necessary to drug the lubrication or it's actors/actresses.
169
alilhillbilly 3 days ago +47
In fact, that's a great way to run afoul of protections for p***. F*** this guy. I used to work for Playboy and we were crazy about releases and other things.
47
SarahArabic2 3 days ago +24
i still do and drugs are extremely prohibited on any production set. you can’t consent if you’re high. where are the film release? (required) Where are the 2257? (with photos of everyone and their IDs.) Where is the location release and all the other safety documents and require requirements that we do on every single scene I’ve ever been on… where are they Diddy?
24
HazardousLazarus 3 days ago +4
It's really crazy to see you multiple times in the comments section on Listnook. What a time to be alive.
4
tooclosetocall82 3 days ago +6
I haven’t read much into the freak offs. They were drugging the lube?
6
DrunkenDude123 2 days ago +1
Or beat and extort them.. just bc you recorded it doesn’t make it legal or “protected by the 1st amendment”
1
hashtaglurking 3 days ago
How do you drug lubrication?
0
RavenRainTie 3 days ago +4
There are drugs and aphrodisiacs that affect a person just by making skin contact.
4
hashtaglurking 3 days ago -2
Hmmm...I don't want to know why you know that. 😅
-2
JustToyingAround73 3 days ago +6
They know this because most adults know that drugs can also be absorbed by the body internally, not just by sniffing, smoking or consumption.
6
EchoesofIllyria 2 days ago +1
How do you think things like pain relief creams work?
1
hashtaglurking 2 days ago
How do you not know how to read and comprehend?
0
EchoesofIllyria 2 days ago +1
Let me clarify for you since you’re adamant about being a silly goose: They know about it because rub-in drugs exist in medical contexts too. Have a *great* day.
1
hashtaglurking 2 days ago
Insults followed by passive-aggression. Nice!
0
EchoesofIllyria 2 days ago +1
“Thank you for the clarification” Ah no worries :)
1
Tokie-Dokie 4 days ago +228
Is beating a woman and dragging her by her hair also covered by the first amendment?
228
bigtime1158 3 days ago +84
Depends. How much money do you have?
84
SeaTurtleLionBird 3 days ago +20
Money as in USD? Or Trump Crypto coin?
20
Tasty_Principle_518 3 days ago +3
In real doll hairs
3
klownplaza 3 days ago +2
Hawktuah coin
2
thedude0425 3 days ago +14
According to the Roberts court conservatives? Probably.
14
Low-Impression3367 3 days ago +4
Your honor, cavemen did this many years ago. It’s nothing more than a sign of affection.
4
chiaboy 3 days ago +9
That wasn’t what he was charged for.
9
Encyclopenia 3 days ago +9
INCREDIBLY So
9
Glad_Position3592 3 days ago +14
Agreed. It seems like the prosecutors really shit the bed when it came to the actual charges. This guy did horrible, vile shit and all they came up with was a long shot RICO charge and a bullshit prostitution technicality? Like, he f****** raped a lot of people
14
OrangeThrower 3 days ago +1
It was a rhetorical question
1
chiaboy 3 days ago -6
More so an irrelevant defamatory distraction that attempts to widen the scope of discussion without adding clarity. Focus people. Stay on topic.
-6
OrangeThrower 3 days ago +5
Stay on topic? Like the bad things the dude did that there is video evidence of? Okay will do
5
Encyclopenia 3 days ago +2
… the f*** ? Are you saying it’s defamatory to say he beat and dragged a woman by the hair ? Because there is actual footage of this, so I really don’t get it ?
2
chiaboy 3 days ago -1
No. I’m saying it’s out of scope for the trial and related legal defense. Ie the topic. It’s like discussing the attack on Iran and then bringing up the fact that Trump buried his first wife on a golf course. Yeah we know he’s a piece of shit but that’s not what we’re discussing.
-1
Encyclopenia 3 days ago +2
Hence … the comment specifying it was rhetorical
2
chiaboy 3 days ago -1
Exactly. It has nothing to do with the trial, the appeal, the charges or the first amendment. Rhetorical in the stupidest f****** way
-1
Encyclopenia 3 days ago +4
Or maybe it’s worth being brought to everyone’s attention any chance we get ? Domestic violence should always be talked about, since it’s so rarely punished.
4
chiaboy 3 days ago -3
How f****** noble. You guys are doing the lords work here. (F****** white people are so f****** delusional). Sorry, SOME white peoples
-3
suff0cat 3 days ago +2
Doi, it was clearly method acting for their amateur p**********. How else do you ever expect them to go pro?
2
0098six 3 days ago +2
Makes you wonder...where is her right to not be abused against her will? Jesus, these rich guys. They just really believe they are above the law.
2
The_Lapsed_Pacifist 3 days ago +1
No but it is mandatory for anyone who wishes to hold a high office in the Trump regime.
1
obalovatyk 3 days ago +1
He alleged that was a separate incident and not related to the other charges.
1
Senior-Procedure-748 3 days ago
Yeah it's called slam poetry
0
[deleted] 3 days ago -6
[removed]
-6
estemprano 3 days ago +6
Your emojis seem to mock her. A victim can choose how they want justice. They are still a victim.
6
Specialist_Key_8606 3 days ago +3
I think a lot of people fail to realize how defense treats victims on the stand in sexual assault cases. That’s true for women who were abused by no-name predators. I could not imagine testifying as a victim in such a high-profile situation. It has to be worse. You are right, it’s up to the victim to decide what justice looks like.
3
SgtHulkasBigToeJam 3 days ago +24
In p**** (amateur or otherwise) both actors must be willing participants
24
GinInfusedGopherToes 3 days ago +48
Actually, I think the judge should give that sick f*** more time now for taking zero accountability and showing no remorse. But money. 🤷
48
_IndyCar 3 days ago +24
Doesn’t amateur p**** come with its own set of regulations? Like doesn’t every guest have to know and willingly be part of that to begin with?
24
Moonpie_Harley 3 days ago +6
Yeah that part they are missing
6
Ghstfce 3 days ago +18
They're just throwing ~~shit~~ *baby oil* at the wall to see what ~~stick~~s *slides*
18
realzequel 3 days ago +2
His attorneys are probably happy to keep billing him at their rates. “Sure Diddy, we didn't think of that! But that’s going to take a long time to put together”
2
fireky2 3 days ago +1
He's trying to slide out of his conviction
1
elektricniorgazam 3 days ago +16
If I say what I want I'll be banned from listnook so I will just say may he have the life he deserves
16
Red-Sun-Cinema 3 days ago +14
I guess all those men and women who accused Diddy of being drugged and raped against their will were just amateur p*** stars trying to break into the industry. If so, why would they go through him since he has no foot in the professional p*** industry. Just another lame excuse he's using to get out of serving time.
14
BusyBeeBridgette 3 days ago +10
I like lube as much as the next woman, but I don't have a second home filled to the brim with lube bottles.
10
cmaia1503 4 days ago +19
> Diddy's lawyers claim the Mann Act doesn't apply ... "Freak-offfs and hotel nights were highly choreographed sexual performances involving the use of costumes, role play, and staged lighting which were filmed so Combs and his girlfriends could watch this amateur p********** later. P********** production and viewing of this sort is protected by the First Amendment and thus cannot constitutionally be prosecuted." > Prosecutors call the claims "meritless, but Diddy's prosecution is not a classic Mann Act. > Diddy's legal team is also arguing the 50-month sentence is out of line with sentencing guidelines -- they say the typical sentence is 15 months. Diddy has served 19 months. > The Defense says the judge considered evidence connected to the more serious charges -- racketeering and sex trafficking -- of which Diddy was acquitted. In other words, any evidence of force or coercion, so says the defense, was out of bounds for the judge to consider, and that includes the Cassie video.
19
BluePeriod_ 3 days ago +19
They’re not even a tiny bit worried that there might be a hell lol
19
VirginiaUSA1964 3 days ago +5
Points for a creative, out-of-the-box defense. Laughable, but creative.
5
john_the_quain 3 days ago +9
Constitutionally protected freak offs, your honor.
9
cyanide4suicide 3 days ago +7
Rapist regrets doing rapey things
7
MaxPower836 3 days ago +8
Ah yes the no consent p**** industry
8
ACW1129 3 days ago +8
If everyone was consenting, maybe.
8
RGQcats 3 days ago +7
R*** is not protected.
7
Pianist_Select 3 days ago
I mean if you’re the president, or were a president or a prince, or like really close to a president or rich, or a cop, or a soldier or like if you move to France or something.
0
arielantennae 3 days ago +7
Still doesn’t apply when it’s against peoples will
7
[deleted] 3 days ago +8
[deleted]
8
church-rosser 3 days ago +1
the 'lesser primates' resent your comment.
1
andy4775 3 days ago +1
What lol.
1
KittyIsAn9ry 3 days ago +6
Pathetic POS. Just take your conviction and disappear for the love of god
6
Goldnglam 3 days ago +6
That's a hell of a hail Mary.
6
Cutrush 3 days ago +4
Took them a whole lotta time to come up with an excuse.
4
spe3dfr3ak 3 days ago +11
Maybe he should stay in prison until he is rehabilitated, then? Isn't that the point?
11
brown2420 3 days ago +5
These lawyers are making money 💰!!
5
Sorryaboutthat1time 3 days ago +4
Your lawyer screams appeal, only thinking bout a bill.
4
SlurmBigPerm 3 days ago +4
Ah yes the [Family Guy defense](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDscdmOwDNA)
4
JediMasterKev 3 days ago +4
I do recall Thomas Jefferson had thoughts on the freedoms of Freak Offs.
4
_BreadDenier 3 days ago +5
If it’s p*** don’t you need waivers? Doubt he has those.
5
eggflip1020 3 days ago +2
I was for sure ready to bet on a prison break. Like I thought we were at that point. His best bet would be to hire up some Legionnaire/Mercenary, whatever types, pull some legs maneuver to schedule a hear and have some dudes sprint him in transport. I honestly thought that was what he was going to pull. I’m talking little assault dudes with uzis dangling from helicopters And shit lol
2
BareNakedSole 3 days ago +2
So he wasn’t just stockpiling baby oil for the apocalypse….. makes sense now
2
bayoubunny88 3 days ago +2
Is he admitting to also recording his unconsented transgressions?
2
Legitimate-Public-56 3 days ago +2
It sounds like he’s just making his situation worse. Dude, just do your time it’ll be over before you know it. Another tip, move to another country.
2
msc62 3 days ago +2
Such a gross dude
2
PuckSenior 3 days ago +2
“Actually, I am not a serial killer. I was making an amateur horror movie and therefore my actions are protected by the 1st amendment!”-Jeffrey Dahmer
2
Glittering-Regret196 3 days ago +4
Add it to the list of evil or embarrassing things america has done or had done this month. Grab your popcorn, its like hourly now.
4
builtlikebrad 3 days ago +2
Diddy should spill the tea on Trump
2
epicgrilledchees 3 days ago +1
You have to be distributing and or selling for that.
1
vroart 3 days ago +1
Lmao, that’s not even how that works! The amount of legal work…. A NEW JERSEY STRIP CLUB goes through, would never go “nope, freedom of speech!” Lmao
1
anand_rishabh 3 days ago +1
Bro already got nothing compared to what he actually did and he's still complaining?? What the f***
1
NotOneWoodpeckerBut2 2 days ago
Is the constitution still a thing over there anyway? - Confused European.
0
EdieVv 2 days ago +1
Not if it wasn't consensual
1
Fair-Goat5761 3 days ago +1
Why does no one care about snoop dog and his p**** movie company? Doggie style? He's representing the US at the Olympics? judge on talent show? Golfing with orange dump? They both need to be sent to prison...
1
ElectrOPurist 3 days ago
Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggghhhhhhh
0
VirtuaFighter6 3 days ago -9
He’s got a point
-9
3D-Dreams 3 days ago +7
I didn't see anything in the first amendment about being allowed to secretly drug your amateur p**** guests.
7
← Back to Board