If you have more money than God and you decide against using it to improve the world, worse you decide to use it to make the world worse, than you’re actually legitimately evil.
4564
Flapjack__PalmdaleApr 2, 2026
+2528
I say this all the time: I hear people saying "if I had Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk money I'd fix [insert problem]." Yeah. Of course you would, and that's why you're not a billionaire. Billionaires don't get to that number through kindness and compassion.
Bezos had the sack to say in an interview, "I have so much capital now that the only thing I could possibly use it for is space travel" while he has employees sick, breaking their bodies, and pissing in bottles while getting paid poverty wages.
2528
ubernutieApr 2, 2026
+786
That's because other humans are NPCs to them.
They do not see people as people, just tools to use or extract from.
One day I imagine the people working directly for them will realize this and do something about it.
786
throwthegarbageawayApr 2, 2026
+299
I don't think the average person realizes this to its fullest extent.
These people can pay for literally anything. Humans are as valuable to them as any other mammal. We farm animals and let's be honest, more than half of us don't think about its ethical implications whatsoever. We keep pets that we love even if they will never contribute to our society like our peers. Some of us keep guard dogs around for a sense of security. We deal with pests with poison because it's the most effective and fast even though it might have some colateral damage. We step on a roach when we see it because it's dirty, gross and carry disease.
Thats how they see us, and let's be honest it wasn't out of their own merits. Society as a whole built them and keeps them fed and it's too late to take it back.
299
OldspaghettiApr 2, 2026
+67
Its not necessarily to late, unless violence is out of the equation these days. I doubt it considering Luigi Mangione efforts, showing some form of revolution is possible still. Just gotta wait for the right time of potential opportunities to unfold. Could be awhile beyond our lifetime even, who knows.
67
RogueJelloApr 2, 2026
+38
They have been, you can see it in the unionization efforts at Amazon and other places. You can also see those places attempt to stop those efforts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_and_trade_unions
38
ISoldMyPeanitsFarmApr 2, 2026
+97
That's not sack, that's psychopathy. He is aware they are suffering. He almost certainly enjoys it.
97
Flapjack__PalmdaleApr 2, 2026
+37
Oh of course he knows, that's the thing. None of this could be unintentional. His machine is design to grind people to a paste, it's built that way so he must know it's working as intended.
37
Count_BackwardsApr 2, 2026
+26
Which is why people mad at AOC for blocking an Amazon warehouse in her district can f*** off. "But we want a human-paste grinding machine in our neighborhood!"
26
TheMaskedMan2Apr 2, 2026
+84
I don’t get it man. Some of these Billionaires seem desperate for attention and approval too, like Musk. They literally have the power to make the world a better place. To have an impact on history and the world in a positive way. Many of them are elderly and won’t be around forever. Why hoard it?
They literally could be loved by people if they actually tried to fix even a single f****** problem in this world. Hell, they could just live a life of luxury and f*** off too.
But they actively make the world worse. They destroy natural resources, pollute the planet, and are doing everything they can to ensure anyone that isn’t a billionaire is scraping by. What the f***?
84
Flapjack__PalmdaleApr 2, 2026
+76
Drew Gooden put it best IMO. there's the joke about "if we make them pay decent wages, how will they afford their third yacht?" and that's really not the case. They could buy a hundred yachts easily. It's not about spending, it's about accruing. "It's the same obsession with 'number go up' that keeps me addicted to Runescape, but the only life that's ruining is my own"
They could solve world hunger many times over but choose not to, because they just want the number to go up. They don't care about love because they're soulless, empty people. There's something fundamentally broken and/or missing inside of them that would otherwise make them human, but they lack all humanity.
76
No_Industry_1062Apr 3, 2026
+10
It’s a mental illness thinking you need another dime after making a billion, even 100 million, imo.
10
coniferous-1Apr 2, 2026
+122
if you have that much money and do nothing, you're existence *is* making the world worse.
122
Stabby-SteveApr 2, 2026
+47
Making the world worse while also building luxury bunkers for when they've finally pushed too far.
47
YvaelleApr 2, 2026
+22
Not bunkers, supervillain lairs.
22
Autistic-MacaroonApr 2, 2026
+18636
If you make enough money to be a billionaire what do you do with all that money? Dolly Parton is my favorite billionaire because she donates enough of her money to no longer be a billionaire
18636
_netzirkApr 2, 2026
+4466
Love Dolly. And her free monthly book club for all children under the age of five
4466
kiwi_rozzersApr 2, 2026
+1112
My son just got the latest book! Some of his favorite books came from the Imagination Library.
1112
CheapTomato3090Apr 2, 2026
+221
We used to get the books in DC, but when we moved to NJ it stopped because it’s not offered there unfortunately.
221
Feeling-Decision-902Apr 2, 2026
+14
She offers it in Cork, Ireland!
14
Intelligent-Parsley7Apr 2, 2026
+133
Sounds like somebody in New Jersey has a problem with reading.
133
InvictusFragsApr 2, 2026
+112
Other way around actually. Jersey funds a lot of programs.
112
Annual-Media-2938Apr 2, 2026
+628
Dolly Parton > mother Teresa (I’d throw hands at anyone that disagrees!)
628
pollorojoApr 2, 2026
+188
Dolly Parton: Greatest Living American
188
AuntieMame5280Apr 2, 2026
+18
Dolly Parton: Greatest Living HUMAN. 💜
18
kevinmfryApr 2, 2026
+272
Agree. But that's a low bar
272
black_anarchyApr 2, 2026
+266
Hasn't been proven that Mother Teresa was a scammer and a griefer?
266
silverbatwingApr 2, 2026
+336
Not just that, she demanded people under her care not have pain meds cuz suffering is “godly”…..but when she was in pain she took meds.
Hypocrites really piss me tf off
336
Suitable-Quail2094Apr 2, 2026
+159
my grandmother was opus dei catholic and believed the same thing. I had a major knee surgery when i was 15 and she flushed my pain meds when she visited cause i was supposed to "offer my pain up to god" my mom almost thew hands with her.
159
PoullafoucaApr 2, 2026
+51
I had wrist surgery last year. The pain afterwards shocked me so deeply. I was screaming in pain. Your grandmother is a nutcase. I hope your mother was able to replenish your supply.
51
yankeesjenn321Apr 2, 2026
+23
I’d have disowned someone who took my child’s pain relief away.
23
Accomplished_Dark_37Apr 2, 2026
+89
As someone who had a knee op at 15, I would have wrecked my grandma had she flushed the meds. Religion is such a cancer in the modern world.
89
CanabianApr 2, 2026
+42
Totally a cancer.
42
FyrrysApr 2, 2026
+22
I know id have thrown hands
22
DandyLion97Apr 2, 2026
+97
https://www.listnook.com/r/badhistory/s/peJg9mUOl5
Spreading Hitchen's ideas for free, I see.
97
starlightserenade44Apr 2, 2026
+26
That post is INCREDIBLE.
I wish I could contact OP to thank them.
But I can thank you for showing the link!!
26
DandyLion97Apr 2, 2026
+11
Yeah, OP did so much work correcting and investigating the claims. I agree it's very impressive!
11
SamuraiTech5150Apr 2, 2026
+20
I always say that if there is ever a selection for humanity’s spokesperson….she’s in the running.
20
WaterlooMallApr 2, 2026
+280
MAGA Republicans in my small town decided that the local library helping children sign up for her free book club and offering school accounts with no late fees for students was not teaching them responsibility and used their modicum of power to take over the library board and stop it from happening.
280
CharacterActorApr 2, 2026
+135
Supply Side Jesus is all about responsibility.
135
d00berApr 2, 2026
+37
Except for large companies that can't reign in spending.
37
no_its_a_cardiganApr 2, 2026
+106
Bbbbut I had to pay wate fees when I wuz a kid so Dey shud too. God I hate republican thinking
106
julscvln01Apr 2, 2026
+42
But somehow it's never "you should buy a house for 12 quid like I did"...
42
jtshinnApr 2, 2026
+65
No they decided that kids that can read good are a threat to their hopes of clinging to power. Then they dressed it up in ‘responsibility.’
65
LadyBogangles14Apr 2, 2026
+12
Yes, the five year olds should be working in the coal mines and not (checks notes) reading & learning. Supply-side Jesus forbid!!!
12
zooksoupApr 2, 2026
+23
I think my kids believe she writes all of those books. Must be a busy woman
23
MonsiuerGeneralApr 2, 2026
+37
>Must be a busy woman
I hear she works from 9 to 5.
37
bubblegumbaesApr 2, 2026
+793
dolly said "nah im good" and donated herself out of billionaire status while everyone else is buildin rockets to nowhere. main character energy
793
TheMaskedMan2Apr 2, 2026
+232
Let’s build rockets to space but also defund NASA and put it all in MY private corporations! Trust me!
God if we ever get into space exploration and it’s monopolized by more Corporate entities I’m gonna lose it. We’re making Weyland-Yutani in real time.
232
LionBirbApr 2, 2026
+123
People don't realize how much we benefitted from NASA. A lot of our everyday technology is a result of their work. And at least NASA allows licensing of their patents for downstream innovation…
123
DrAstralisApr 2, 2026
+32
Its why I have to roll my eyes every time some armchair chud goes on about how much money NASA "wastes". The moon landing is estimated to have added as much as 14$ to the economy for every dollar spent based on those innovations and technology developed. And that's just the monetary value.
32
StockingDummyApr 2, 2026
+19
>added as much as $14 to the economy
"That's not a very impressive net profi-…"
>**for every dollar spent**
"Um, y'know-… one thing I shou-… excuse me for one second…" (/J)
19
TheMaskedMan2Apr 2, 2026
+63
I know, it’s depressing. We can piss away literally billions every day in Iran, but we can’t fund NASA apparently. Who cares if we’re delaying important stuff by DECADES. We could instead spend that on throwing a missile at people! Wow!
63
NorthernFrostyApr 2, 2026
+22
> Let’s build rockets to space but also defund NASA and put it all in MY private corporations! Trust me!
So let's get this straight... Musk directs DOGE to defund much of NASA, forcing the US Government to rely on SpaceX for satellites and other space activity, which greatly increases the value of SpaceX... Musk also defunds the agencies (FAA, DOJ, EPA and NLRB) that were all pursuing actions against Musk for various laws he broke or regulations he bypassed and the end of those suits also increases the value of SpaceX...
And now Musk intends to [go public with SpaceX](https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2k35lg92dpo) where he looks to make over a trillion dollars thanks to the value SpaceX gained when Musk defunded NASA.
Sounds legit to me!
22
ZyrinjApr 2, 2026
+53
Don’t forget the bunkers, they’ve all got their bunkers for when the masses lose everything to their greed
53
Judge_Bredd3Apr 2, 2026
+36
Dolly won't need a bunker. Dolly will have an army.
36
ZyrinjApr 2, 2026
+18
Yea, amazing the difference in treatment from not being a dragon and hoarding wealth.
Plenty of stories about how bad dragons are and the evil they'd do to increase and maintain their hoard in their cave(bunkers).
18
PhantomPhartsApr 2, 2026
+542
McKenzie Scott is also giving away her billions. Admirable women.
542
SomeoneoldbutnewApr 2, 2026
+229
Yea, she gives away billions and ends up richer YoY. The system is structurally broken.
229
PhantomPhartsApr 2, 2026
+124
That's true. She is putting in tremendous effort, which is a lot more than could be said about most rich people.
124
Elmtree3000Apr 2, 2026
+57
Exactly.. have away billions.. yet still has more than the previous year. So.. really could give away even more.
Tax the rich!!!
57
ExcitementGlad2995Apr 2, 2026
+7
She donated a few million to my work place.
7
robotteethApr 2, 2026
+1772
That’s just it. If you are a “good” billionaire you give away so much you lose the status. Thus there are no good billionaires
1772
SoochSoochApr 2, 2026
+199
Imagine having enough wealth to actually make big changes in the world, and then instead of using that power to make the world a better place, you use it to create monuments to your own selfishness.
199
Relative_Cod_6675Apr 2, 2026
+22
literally could end homelessness in the United States, builds another data center.
22
Recovery8Apr 2, 2026
+281
If you're a billionaire, your goal should be to change that asap.
281
Shark7996Apr 2, 2026
+104
Elon: "I'm on it! Trillionaire it is."
104
BigFuckHead_Apr 2, 2026
+277
There is no justifiable reason to horde over a billion dollars. Dolly is completely correct as usual.
277
lowbatteriesApr 2, 2026
+14
The best kind of correct.
14
FizzyBeverageApr 2, 2026
+109
Steve Wozniak is on that same list.
109
Suspicious-Chair5130Apr 2, 2026
+29
Paul Allen too
29
PrebenInAcapulcoApr 2, 2026
+43
Plus he has great business cards
43
KittehKittehKatApr 2, 2026
+100
My first instinct would be to help people with it but I assume that’s how you don’t become a billionaire.
100
jaimequinApr 2, 2026
+39
She's awesome. I've always thought having $100 million was more than enough. It's kind of ludicrous to think one person can hoard that much money and keep it out of circulation. I'd be funding programs that created clean water, carbon collection, plastic recycling, basically all the stuff we need that can't turn a profit but has to be done.
39
OhGr8WhatNowApr 2, 2026
+598
Nobody "makes" that much money. They get it by underpaying workers. Then they hoard it so they can manipulate society
598
Capable_Afternoon216Apr 2, 2026
+93
You don't get a billion dollars from a salary, you get a billion dollars by exploiting workers surplus value and being a psycho lacking empathy and reflection.
[https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b6Zw50f5jJk](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b6Zw50f5jJk)
93
Corellian_BrowncoatApr 2, 2026
+74
You don't even get a billion dollars by "exploiting workers surplus value," you get a billion dollars by convincing bankers and finance bros you ought to be worth that. Seriously.
Musk is "worth" almost a trillion dollars because Tesla is "worth" a trillion dollars. But Tesla's $1.14 Trillion is "market capitalization," which is the number of stock shares outstanding times the price of the last share sold. Tesla doesn't make a trillion dollars, they had an operating profit of $4 billion last year on $95 billion in revenue. They don't have a trillion dollars, they have $82 billion in net assets, of which the biggest piece is $30 billion in book value of facilities and equipment. If Tesla kept every cent of operating profit it made in cash, it would take more than 200 years to have a trillion dollars.
But because a day trader paid $365 for one of over 3 billion shares just now, Tesla is "worth" one trillion dollars, and Musk is "worth" $700 billion or whatever. But the dirty secret of finance is that there is no way Musk could get $365 per share if he dumped his 12% stake. It's only worth that if he keeps it. So anybody whose "wealth" is tied to the valuation of large companies isn't participating in the same economy as the rest of us, their economy is based on a "just trust me bro" scorecard propped up by the mutual interest the billionaires and finance bros have in keeping it propped up.
74
crashvoncrashApr 2, 2026
+12
This is really what it comes down to. The stock market has become totally disconnected from reality. That's why it can keep going up even as our economy turns to shit.
It feels like a damn Ponzi scheme at this point. People talk about how their 401k is doing great, but that's all hypothetical value. This is why there are penalties (on top of taxes) for taking money out of your 401k. They need your money to stay locked in there to keep propping up the system and making it look good. If everyone tried to cash out at the same time, the whole market would collapse, because there's not enough actual economic value being created to support those stock prices.
12
TathanorApr 2, 2026
+183
It's actually incredibly difficult to give away your money fast enough to lose the status because of how much money you make every day. You couldn't even realistically spend it in any kind of meaningful way.
Mckenzie Scott, the billionaire ex wife of Jeff Bezos, has an entire team of people dedicated in helping her donate her massive wealth and its a full time job for everyone.
183
e-rekt-ionApr 2, 2026
+44
The 10 year old inside my brain still gets excited by a Brewsters Millions scenario
44
BaelenciagaaApr 2, 2026
+42
I’m pretty sure I could find a way 😂
I’d just make a Listnook post and send everyone a fat stack
42
goldensklessApr 2, 2026
+8260
The only good billionaire is someone who redistributes their wealth to the point they never become one. Dolly Parton is a good example
Pretty cool seeing that guy mentioned here, given how he's been pretty anonymous
349
sleepymeowth052Apr 2, 2026
+400
I miss when billionaires were anonymous and we didn't have to hear their stupid opinions all the time
400
btone911Apr 3, 2026
+106
They used to keep quiet so as to not remind the populace how badly they’re being screwed by the billionaires.
106
flavourjesusApr 3, 2026
+18
He wanted to be anonymous. My dad worked with him (in Australia) to build medical research institutes. He never wanted any recognition or his name on any buildings. They used to refer to him as "the American" because he didn't want the publicity, and he carried his stuff around in a plastic bag lol. Great guy by all accounts.
18
dawidowmakaApr 2, 2026
+150
Making money off rich travelers and then donating all of it is a win in my book
150
philosopherberzererApr 2, 2026
+16
Fuckin legend.
16
avondaliaApr 2, 2026
+153
The only good Billionaire is a former Billionaire.
153
oulipoApr 2, 2026
+137
Taxing the rich is a good example
137
ButterscotchTop3441Apr 2, 2026
+12
Also Yvon Chouinard (founder of Patagonia)
12
Overall_Outcome_392Apr 2, 2026
+9018
I never used to, but I think that class of people have revealed their true colours in recent years. I'm starting to believe you can't be both a billionaire and a good person.
9018
Merrcury2Apr 2, 2026
+2385
Citizen's United killed all faith in campaign finance for me. If a democracy can be bought, it no longer stands as a democracy in my view.
2385
PissNBiscuitsApr 2, 2026
+674
Keep paying attention to Montana and what voters there decide regarding The Montana Plan. If that passes, it would basically neuter Citizens United in any state that passes a similar initiative.
I'm not holding my breath, but it's nice to have a small bit of light to hold on to every now and then.
674
discodropperApr 2, 2026
+112
Interesting, never heard of it. I’ll take a look but do you have a TLDR? Also, would it be just for state-level elections, or also federal?
112
PissNBiscuitsApr 2, 2026
+284
[Here's](https://transparentelection.org/) a link to what the initiative is all about, but in short, states are the ones who get to determine what a "corporation" is or isn't. If a state determines that a corporation does not have political spending power, then Citizen's United doesn't matter and is meaningless. That's Montanans are voting on this November. If it passes, that'll open the door for other states to pass the same or similar initiatives.
284
outofdoubtoutofdarkApr 2, 2026
+104
Pretty unlikely it’ll pass here, but who knows! We did insert a right to abortion into our state constitution with the same breath we voted for trump and several other GOP/MAGA goons 🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️
104
JalopnicycleApr 2, 2026
+73
Conservative states with direct democracy constitutions always have a bunch of Dem/Liberal protections because they're popular across the voting population.
Ohio had one of the worst abortion bans (put in place by GOP politicians) but it was rendered moot by state constitutional amendments that were passed through direct democracy. Obviously the wealth and GOP have tried to neuter this right but it's failed despite their best efforts.
73
julscvln01Apr 2, 2026
+18
Despite knowing nearly nothing about Montana I have some faith, isn't it literally the only State with some semblance of labour protections?
18
AwildYanersApr 2, 2026
+52
Yep. And we’re in late stage capitalism.
The point where our economy has seeped into controlling and swaying our officials to do their bidding.
It’s when the middle class starts rapidly declining, and we’re left a .1% that owns 90% of our country’s wealth.
They want us as wage slaves, they want us infighting, and we’re not living people to these ghouls, and whoever is subservient good boys to them, we’re just numbers on a spreadsheet to help their bottom line.
52
Dannysan5677Apr 2, 2026
+1139
Nobody needs to be a billionaire. If they were nice people they would donate money until they were at least in the hundreds of millions. But they aren't, so they don't. Although you could argue they wouldn't be billionaires in the first place if they were good people.
Edit - thanks for the hundreds of comments telling me what wealth is. I think I need a few more of you to tell me before I give a shit.
Edit part 2 - I stand corrected. Long live the billionaires!
1139
waterbird_Apr 2, 2026
+529
I work in philanthropy and I know it sounds kind of stupid but giving away that much money in a responsible way is actually fairly hard to do. Which is why people probably shouldn’t be allowed to amass that much wealth to begin with.
529
KoalifiedGorillaApr 2, 2026
+1125
Can’t think of better philanthropy than paying your working class a living wage.
1125
dicksjshsbApr 2, 2026
+237
Wish I could give this comment an award.
I’m sure there are businesspeople out there who couldve become billionaires but opted to run their company appropriately and treat employees/customers fairly. They don’t run into the issue of how to do “the right thing” with their absurd wealth because they did the right thing along the way.
Essentially impossible to amass billionaire level wealth without screwing people over, whether it’s your employees your customers, your partners, or taxpayers subsidizing bullshit. You couldn’t convince me there’s a CEO out there’s who’s work is literally worth a billion dollars. That value has to be extracted from the employees labor or artificially inflated by monopolization/other unfair advantages over competition.
237
whenimtiredApr 2, 2026
+110
From Teddy Roosevelt: "No amount of charity in spending such fortunes can compensate in any way for the misconduct in acquiring them."
110
MotherTurdHammerApr 2, 2026
+14
What? Are you trying to say that Billionaires didn't actually just work all the hard hours to get there? I will not believe it! These are straight-up BOOTSTRAP people!
/s
Seeing how some of these people & their organizations operate from a legal perspective is nauseating. Their wealth is ALWAYS built on the backs of the people.
14
RazzilithApr 2, 2026
+9
Teddy was one of the best leaders this country ever had even with his flaws.
9
MildlySaltedTaterTotApr 2, 2026
+104
Squeezed properly, Costco could be incredibly lucrative for a selective few…for just a few years. But Costco’s consumer-friendly practices combine with their pro-labor culture to genuinely cater a good retail experience to customers.
104
MattiasHook61Apr 2, 2026
+24
totally agree with the living wage point. its crazy how some billionaires act like they can't pay their workers more or give back in meaningful ways when they easily could. like, how hard is it to treat people well and still make a profit?
24
dicksjshsbApr 2, 2026
+14
Not hard, just *less* profit. Gotta squeeze every drop
14
TheMaskedMan2Apr 2, 2026
+14
I don’t think anyone in the world does enough work to be worth a billion dollars. That’s an absurd amount of wealth. More wealth than could ever be spent by anyone.
You’re above luxury at that point and money no longer has as much meaning. No wonder Billionaires graduate from caring about money to wanting to amass national influence and power.
14
esoteric_enigmaApr 2, 2026
+137
This. F*** philanthropy. They can choose to donate millions to their favorite college football team or to the local orchestra to get their name on the wall. That doesn't help the average worker that they're exploiting.
137
WelshyoneApr 2, 2026
+61
This should be so much higher - philanthropy is often a fig leaf for those who pay a low tax rate because of very expensive tax planning.
61
Ghosty91AFApr 2, 2026
+11
Dragons don't like parting with their wealth, unfortunately
11
CamelTheFurryGamerApr 2, 2026
+203
If they could only PAY TAXES instead of paying lobbyists to get them to PAY LESS TAXES they wouldn't have that f****** "problem."
"I have too much money," whines the billionaire. "I could never give it all away!"
"Well... you can't take it with you," someone reminds them.
"But generational wealth!"
"You don't have kids, idiot!"
203
GoldenStateWizardsApr 2, 2026
+12
>"But generational wealth!"
>"You don't have kids, idiot!"
And even if they did have descendants, they could still achieve that with a fraction of their wealth. A big reason the general public isn't overwhelmingly against billionaires, is that it's really hard to grasp just how much money that is. You could be able to afford a private chef, housekeeping, luxury cars, an estate, a vacation house, and a boat, all while still being closer in wealth to a homeless person than a billionaire, let alone the true wealthy elite.
12
ClaphappyApr 2, 2026
+60
Or your kids hate you because you're evil and/or a pedophile.
60
ShookMyHeadAndSmiledApr 2, 2026
+47
Deadnaming trans 🚫
Deadnaming Twitter 👍
47
BottleTempleApr 2, 2026
+19
Deadnaming the Sears Tower 👍👍
19
justinpaulsonApr 2, 2026
+30
The problem isn’t just amassing the wealth. The real issue is that the companies that generate this wealth don’t distribute it evenly amongst the people that worked to generate the wealth. The labor is effectively exploited and the ownership is concentrated to a few… many times to people who aren’t even involved in production!
They should be giving away their wealth as chunks of ownership in their companies to the employees that are working at the companies.
30
Amazing-Roof-7827Apr 2, 2026
+6
Ding ding ding.
Every time a billionaire (or very wealthy person) says words to the effect of "but i earned my money fair and square, it's mine to do whatever I want with" the answer should be "you *didn't* earn most of it fair and square, and therefore it's not truly yours to do whatsoever you want with. If you want to accumulate money, you must accept the shackles of redistributing it to benefit those who worked for it, and not to further enrich yourself. This is not optional."
6
rodeBaksteenApr 2, 2026
+16
Taxes can solve a lot of this
And yes governments piss money away, but they do that now regardless of high tax on billionaires or not.
16
cipheredthoughtsApr 2, 2026
+53
What about Bezos ex? Isn’t she the poster child for “good” billionaires?
53
Kurt805Apr 2, 2026
+28
The type of hole in your soul you need to not just f*** off and f*** hookers on a Greek island after like, 60 million, is unfathomable to me. You can't trust people like that.
28
TheOneWesApr 2, 2026
+169
There's no belief to it.
There is no way for an individual to accrue that much money without majorly f****** people over.
169
ButtScratchiesApr 2, 2026
+77
It’s extremely difficult to get to that level of wealth by “following the rules.” They are completely comfortable with exploiting other people and rely heavily on government handouts. And it’s turning out that there is a higher than average correlation of pedophilia amongst billionaires.
77
esoteric_enigmaApr 2, 2026
+44
I just watched a video about the proposed wealth tax in California. It would tax them a one time 5% on their actual wealth, not income. One of the billionaire tech guys was in an interview literally saying this law had him and his wife "grieving".
These guys are sick. Literally nothing is enough for them. They have to squeeze every dollar out of us and horde it like a dragon.
44
BobbyOregonApr 2, 2026
+33
Yeah - I think they were always like this probably. But in the noughties we only really thought about them for things like the Gates Foundation and Buffet. Big fall off to Zuck and Musk
33
Consistent-Star5745Apr 2, 2026
+48
Throughout history, philanthropy has been a good way for the ultra rich to both get tax breaks and give themselves a positive image to the public.
48
neutromancerApr 2, 2026
+12
I still remember that interview of the "philanthropist" Bill Gates saying that minimum wage is bad. Obviously because it makes him look bad, as you say, if there aren't poor people everywhere how can he make a show of being charitable?
12
kilamumsterApr 2, 2026
+6
And if you set up your own or keep it in your elite circle of pals, you get to employ your cronies and nepo-babies to run the philanthropic organization. And pay your board of trustees well for a couple hours of "work" a month.
6
Rambo_IIIIApr 2, 2026
+25
You're "starting to believe?"
You don't get to billionaire status without basically f****** over mountains of people
25
zucchini0478Apr 2, 2026
+5850
It's immoral to hoard wealth when people are starving. You won capitalism, hurray, you're awesome. Now fix something instead of salting the earth behind you.
5850
Logbotherer99Apr 2, 2026
+1511
In the past, those at the very top built things like libraries and museums, they gifted parks to the public, founded hospitals, patronised the arts.
Now they seem to do the opposite of all those.
1511
gs87Apr 2, 2026
+1191
A lot of those gifts from people like Andrew Carnegie or John D. Rockefeller came after they made fortunes through monopolies, brutal labor conditions, and crushing competition. Philanthropy wasn’t charity in a vacuum .. it was reputation management, tax strategy, and a way to shape society on their terms.
It’s not that they got worse.
It’s that people stopped falling for the propaganda so they don't waste money on PR anymore
1191
Norseman901Apr 2, 2026
+572
Youre forgetting a key point of why those guys needed to rehab their image, namely being they were afraid their workers were gonna come and beat them to death.
572
cinnamonspiderrApr 2, 2026
+504
#MakeBillionairesAfraidAgain
504
[deleted]Apr 2, 2026
+105
[removed]
105
AmericainaLyonApr 2, 2026
+78
1000 to 1? I believe it's more like 350k to 1 in USA and a few million to 1 globally.
78
Thining-CultureApr 2, 2026
+20
It's a lot more than 1000 to 1.
20
deltarefundApr 2, 2026
+6
Free Luigi!
6
Jaybird0501Apr 2, 2026
+61
That part. I miss the days when workers would beat their exploitative bosses.
61
OmateidoApr 2, 2026
+30
“Be the change you wish to see in the world.” - Gandhi
30
scubastefonApr 2, 2026
+68
100%. I actually hate philanthropy as a principle. I would prefer if you just pay your f****** taxes. And let the rest of us decide how the money gets allocated, through our elected officials.
68
brielzebub665Apr 2, 2026
+15
Right, it's just a different side of the same coin. And frequently is just showboating anyway, it doesn't usually help that many people (not as many as it would if the money were in the community to begin with)
15
SiebjeApr 2, 2026
+21
"People stopped falling for propaganda"
*Looks at the current state of the USA*
Are you sure of that?
21
ybetaepsilonApr 2, 2026
+41
And they are now all laying off workers while companies see record profits...
41
one_pound_of_fleshApr 2, 2026
+24
Now they build bunkers and hire private security to protect them from the starving masses.
24
acidenitriqueApr 2, 2026
+16
Because they were heavily taxed, so building something was a great way to limit those taxes.
16
ParaBellumBitchesApr 2, 2026
+293
I think this is my main problem with it. A moral person could not be that wealthy...they would donating it. Once a normal person has accumulated so much that they don't even know what to do with it, why the hell wouldn't you look for ways to give it away?
293
LeCr0ssApr 2, 2026
+172
and instead of helping they start paying politicians to accept worse laws for average human just to profit more
172
MyNamesAreStolenApr 2, 2026
+68
You don't even have to donate it. No one person has contributed to society in the amount of billions of dollars. That means their wealth was gained from disproportionate division of proceeds of labor from others.
Whether they are not paying their employees fairly, or are charging their customers unfairly, in order to make billions in profit, you have to have ripped off millions.
68
AbsolutelyAverageApr 2, 2026
+19
This. I can't imagine needing so much money. Walking through my town here in Central Portugal, I often go reminiscing what I'd do if I'd be a billionaire. I'd buy all the homes, restore them, and rent them out for social renting prices, well-maintained and everything. I'd support local businesses and encourage young people to start their own, I'd fund initiatives that help prevent and combat the wildfires, invest in care. I'd buy up land to prevent it from being developed by foreign investors for mining etc.
THE THINGS I WOULD DO.
19
Specialist_Delay_262Apr 2, 2026
+3715
You generally dont earn your way to a billion
you abuse your way there
3715
bigtiddyhimboApr 2, 2026
+1520
You can’t make that amount of money without being a complete and total sociopath in my opinion. Whether from price gouging, layoffs, or cutting down their workers pay, or straight up using slave labor, there’s something horrendous they had to to be able to make that much.
1520
Specialist_Delay_262Apr 2, 2026
+449
Those of us that understand how much a billion is against a million.
LET ALONG A GOD DAMN TRILLION , understand how ridiculous it is.
The fact that someone might become a trillionaire is just not ok
31 days vs 31 years vs 31,000 years
449
NK1337Apr 2, 2026
+230
To put it in perspective - you could stand naked in the middle of a field with $0 and still be closer to having $1 million than a millionaire is to having a billion.
230
Competitive_Tear2503Apr 2, 2026
+135
The difference between a million and a billion is about a billion.
135
Specialist_Delay_262Apr 2, 2026
+69
my man thats a hell of a way to compare it lmao
69
daniel22457Apr 2, 2026
+62
Dudes not wrong though people don't realize that the difference between them and the homeless man on the street is only a few bits of bad luck.
62
bepatientbekindApr 2, 2026
+24
Bad luck doesn't ruin a rich person's life though. Once you have enough money, it's impossible to fail. The system was built this way intentionally.
24
TheSilverNobleApr 2, 2026
+38
A billion dollars is not a neutral amount of money
38
Primary-Policy-4383Apr 2, 2026
+16
You forgot something..... you have had to been born wealthy and already have a small fortune first, then you steal more and step on people
16
arizonadirtbag12Apr 2, 2026
+26
Outside of a literal l****** win it is basically impossible to get to a billion dollars in wealth without taking advantage of others. Because every single dollar of that billion is a dollar you didn’t pay the other people who helped you earn that billion.
Because nobody earns a billion solo.
And this is true even for non-liquid wealth. There are ways to share that equity without ceding control of the company.
26
lightknight7777Apr 2, 2026
+265
Wages have been dramatically stagnating ever since HR could just Google average salaries and adjust for their local cost of living. That plus the enshittification of the quality of products through cheaper materials and programmed obsolescence are wholly unacceptable.
Millions can be made from hard work. Billions are made on the backs of others.
265
YournuStepdadApr 2, 2026
+1314
Because I automatically dislike people that take 99% of the pizza at the pizza party for themselves.
1314
AdmiralThunderpantsApr 2, 2026
+319
Don't forget in many cases they are trying to convince everyone else that others are trying to steal their 1% left over while they eat a single slice and let the rest sit there and rot.
319
cromstantinopleApr 2, 2026
+90
[Careful mate, that foreigner wants your cookie](https://pjhollis123.medium.com/careful-mate-that-foreigner-wants-your-cookie-aba1c536b0d8)
90
Amarant2Apr 2, 2026
+11
Thank you for this.
11
TheAgeOfAdz91Apr 2, 2026
+20
And rig the pizza party rules so they get it every time
20
Black_Pill_OhApr 2, 2026
+489
Because they're not contributing equitably to the systems that made them rich.
489
The_Peyote_CoyoteApr 2, 2026
+509
Yes.
1) It is immoral to horde such obscene wealth when so many of the world's problems are caused by and can be solved by redistributing that wealth. By way of 1 example; elon musk claimed that he would "solve" world hunger if presented with a plan costing 6 billion dollars. He was presented one by the UN's world food programme. He reneged. [https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/11/elon-musk-un-world-hunger-famine/](https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/11/elon-musk-un-world-hunger-famine/)
That's a public failure of his character, but *anyone* with wealth approaching that sum could have stepped in. No one did.
That's only 1 example of what a billion dollars can do for the planet.
"Those with a means to act have a responsibility to act".
2) There's no moral way to horde 1 billion dollars. It's only possible via direct or indirect exploitation on an enormous scale.
509
Feeling_Inside_1020Apr 2, 2026
+28
Goddamn i'm gonna have to remember that quote, that's amazing.
28
KemilioApr 2, 2026
+155
In the words of Forest Gump:
“Momma said there's only so much fortune a man really needs and the rest is just for showing off”
You don’t need billions of dollars, and absolutely no one works hard enough to _deserve_ that much money relative to the average person. In fact, you can earn the average US income on pure interest with just $3 million. You don’t need to work a day in your life if you have just .3% of $1 billion.
Lastly, if you have that much money you can pay others to change the rules in your favor (lobbying, etc)
Wealth isn’t the problem, but greed is. And if you think you _need more_ after you have millions, you are very greedy. That makes you a problem for the rest of society because you have much more power to take from those who don’t have as much.
155
Serious_Studio_5642Apr 2, 2026
+14
My dad worked his butt off his whole life and never saw a fraction of that billionaire cash, Forrest Gump nailed it. Greed hoards while the rest scrape by. Spot on about lobbying too.
14
Harvey_ArdentApr 2, 2026
+29
The notion that you have allowed yourself to accumulate that much wealth says EVERYTHING about you as a person and none if it is good.
29
SubtropicalFireworksApr 2, 2026
+150
No. I dislike those who forcibly interject themselves into the public eye without serving any real purpose or doing anything to better the lives of people. With that amount of wealth, yes, I feel that they do have an obligation to give back to society in some way, shape or form.
Even with my modest funds, I give back when and where I can. And that's with so many stores and businesses having prompts to give back to certain charities at the point of sale. Why shouldn't the same be expected of them?
150
TheMaskedMan2Apr 2, 2026
+15
I don’t even get why they don’t want to make the world better. They live in it, and even if it’s for selfish reasons, people would love them more if they helped people instead of hurting them. It’d secure their own position, and the increase in qualify of life would make everything more productive. History has taught us that educated and motivated people are capable of rapid advancements and a lot. So why not?
They also actually have the power to make a genuine change - why do they use it to knowingly make the world worse? I feel like I am insane. It’s such short-sighted thinking.
15
0110110111Apr 2, 2026
+109
Yes. This has been a recent change over the last five years. I’ve never had a problem with people having more than others, some level of income wealth disparity is always going to exist and is probably a good thing for a healthy economy. My problem now is the sheer level of these disparities: these billionaires have too much money, too much power, and they’re doing nothing to make the world a better place. They’ve forgotten that economies are stronger when more people have more money. They fight tooth and nail against anything that’ll impact their wealth even though they could lose 90% of their wealth overnight and literally nothing about their lives would change. If you’ve worked with any you know how they will argue over minuscule amounts of money. Even this war has no impact on them, they’ll still fly their private jets regardless of fuel prices.
F*** billionaires.
109
StockinglegsApr 2, 2026
+11
They're actively making the world worse, actually.
11
[deleted]Apr 2, 2026
+20
[removed]
20
Opening-Movie5382Apr 2, 2026
+6
I keep saying the movie Kingsmen is a prophecy
6
Illustrious_Owl5352Apr 2, 2026
+8
profit soup mountainous husky deliver lock ad hoc chubby thumb yam
8
NothingUpstairs4957Apr 2, 2026
+694
No
Just realistic
Becoming a billionaire means you exploited someone
694
RaisinWorried3528Apr 2, 2026
+233
Many people, they've exploited many people.
233
Maleficent-Ear8475Apr 2, 2026
+58
\*millions
58
Victory_NovemberApr 2, 2026
+516
Yes. There is no such thing as an ethical billionaire.
EDIT: Lots of bootlickers crawling out of the woodwork to defend the artistrocrats. You can take your simpering somewhere else. I'm not interested.
516
CallmemabryartistryApr 2, 2026
+89
dislike is too generous.
i believe they shouldn’t exist nor should the means by which they were able to extort humans to get that money.
there is no ethic way to become that rich
89
Judge_Bredd3Apr 2, 2026
+28
I have an old boss who used to say that when you hit 100 million in wealth, you should get a little award ceremony where they give you a trophy that says "you won capitalism!" and everything after that is taxed 100%. He was a good boss, paid us all above industry standard and covered health insurance 100% because to him, happy workers were good workers.
28
TheNutsMuttsApr 2, 2026
+9
> I have an old boss who used to say that when you hit 100 million in wealth, you should get a little award ceremony where they give you a trophy that says "you won capitalism!" and everything after that is taxed 100%.
Are you sure it was an old boss? Or was it a Twitter meme you saw reposted on here one time?
https://www.listnook.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/fnm2ff/after_you_reach_999_million_you_get_a_trophy_that/
https://www.listnook.com/r/AskEconomics/comments/nsc381/saw_a_tweet_that_said_no_more_billionaires_none/
https://www.listnook.com/r/BrandNewSentence/comments/1owpt5n/you_get_a_trophy_that_says_i_won_capitalism_and/
https://www.listnook.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/rpj1qm/i_won_capitalism/
9
[deleted]Apr 3, 2026
+8
[deleted]
8
Available-Ad-5670Apr 2, 2026
+74
didn't used to, but now i do, especially musk, bezos, zuckerberg, ellison. The ones that don't share their wealth
74
__disgruntledpelicanApr 2, 2026
+36
It's not even about sharing. It's that they go wayyy out of their way to gain more, and the ways they go about doing that (corruption, buying politicians, backroom deals, unfair competition, putting small stores out of business and generally stepping on people to get a leg up) is so infuriating. They are actively making society worse, just so their number goes up.
36
JackSpadesSIApr 2, 2026
+13
It’s worse than not sharing. I could live with them sitting on their piles of gold like Smaug. But they’re using their money to actively make everyone else more miserable. They’re manufacturing propaganda, ending democracy, buying islands to escape to after they’ve burned down everything else. They’re monsters.
13
AeternitasApr 2, 2026
+53
I swear 70% of the comments here are bots.
53
CreepyBlackDudeApr 2, 2026
+104
No, I don't automatically dislike them. The vast majority of billionaires do not have vaults of money waiting to be given away, they're tied up either in stocks or valuations of property or land, things like that. Someone like Taylor Swift is considered a billionaire because her music is currently worth that much as an asset, not because she has it lying around in liquid money. She could not just give away $500 million to the poor because she doesn't actually have $500 million lying around to use.
There are a lot of terrible billionaires who do terrible things-- exploit workers, lobby against the interests of the common people, find loopholes to not pay their fair share of taxes, anything to do with Epstein, etc.--but I think most people's problem with billionaires is that they don't do enough in their eyes. What "enough" is changes from person to person, and while it's disappointing, I don't think it's a reason to hate that entire class of people...especially when so many of them give us so many other reasons to dislike them.
So to reiterate My answer...no, I don't automatically dislike them. It's person to person for me depending on whether they commit terrible acts or allow terrible acts to be committed in their name.
104
Dry_Pea3547Apr 2, 2026
+5
Literally no one in this thread actually knows any billionaires personally so what is the point of this post?
5
KP_WrathApr 2, 2026
+15
Not inherently, but I believe outside of very few fringe cases, you effectively have to make a deal with the devil to be a billionaire, and if you don’t, you will almost certainly become a devil in your own right in the process.
15
Simple_Carpet_49Apr 2, 2026
+98
I do.
There are too many studies that show how extreme wealth changes a person neurologically to think they have the capacity to be normal people.
I also question what kind of person needs to hoard wealth like that knowing that they could affect so much positive change and still be very comfortable.
There are no good billionaires.
200 Comments