· 68 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Apr 19, 2026 at 11:39 AM

Dutch cabinet activates first phase of national oil crisis plan

Posted by Wolfclaw359


Dutch cabinet activates first phase of national oil crisis plan
NL Times
Dutch cabinet activates first phase of national oil crisis plan
The Dutch cabinet will activate the first phase of the national oil crisis plan on Monday as global energy markets are disrupted by renewed instability in the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has reportedly blocked a key shipping route and opened fire on commercial vessels, sending oil prices sharply up and down. The United States is also continuing to detain ships in the Strait.

🚩 Report this post

68 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
leisurechef 6 days ago +264
We’re going to start seeing more countries implementing oil crisis policies
264
Icedanielization 6 days ago +111
And part of that policy will be US and Israel damage control
111
leisurechef 6 days ago +91
Dumping US Treasury Bonds to pay higher oil prices
91
mikasjoman 6 days ago +29
I don't see the value of holding any US assets since it's on a long term devaluation. I sold all my US gov bonds and most stocks since its just not returning any value adjusted for the currency downturn. Most central banks are also moving away from the now dead Petro dollar to gold. It's not like I think it's gonna die, although that's on the table given that the policy right now looks more like a banana republic. But when you got a president that acts like Erdogan with his central bank and being outspoken about wanting to reduce the dollar value.... Yeah. Not gonna hold US assets.
29
leisurechef 6 days ago +5
[Chinese CIPS payment system broke transaction volume records for March 2026](https://www.disruptionbanking.com/2026/04/14/chinas-swift-challenger-breaks-records-as-petrodollar-looms/)
5
leisurechef 6 days ago +6
Don’t forget France recently just pulled all their gold out of the US
6
mikasjoman 6 days ago +4
Well that's pretty small in the total. The US is still the largest holder off gold. At least that's the claim
4
leisurechef 6 days ago +6
It’s more of a comment on trust of where to keep it. [China however is dumping US treasury bonds for gold going 18 months now.](https://www.canadianminingreport.com/blog/china-extends-gold-buying-streak-to-18th-month-as-reserves-climb)
6
DashingDino 6 days ago -8
Unfortunately the Netherlands chose to make themselves dependent on LNG imported from the US by permanently closing their own wells. The entire thing is so stupid, now Dutch politicians can't be critical of trump or he would threaten to cut us off
-8
flying_butt_fucker 6 days ago +3
The Slochteren wells were about to collapse with the province of Groningen on it. Even now, years after closing the wells the risk is still increasing.
3
Past-Acanthaceae862 6 days ago +3
Even if we pump them dry and let Groningen fall into the hellmouth that would only buy us a few years. They're mostly empty.
3
Embarrassed_Ninja608 6 days ago +10
isnt it evil, that all world depends on one small channel it shows how vulnerable it is
10
Lonely_Sale9707 6 days ago +12
Only a fifth of the world depends on it to get their oil
12
Prize_Statistician15 6 days ago +15
I'm a Humanities guy and have no clue about statistics, but I've taken it as an article of faith for decades that a twenty per cent change in a complex system can cause vast changes down the road. (I would love to be given direction towards correcting this stance if I'm terribly mistaken.)
15
macrolidesrule 6 days ago +5
All those second order effects coming through sooner or later. on distillates (jet fuel), fertiliser, urea, helium supplies - used in semi conductor manufacture - the impact on sulphur (used primarily to make sulphuric acid), industrial solvents e.g. methanol etc etc etc
5
SporksInjected 6 days ago +3
This is more like a 10% change because of the Saudi pipeline that empties into the Red Sea and the ADCOP that pipelines to Oman and bypasses the strait. I would believe that the saudis will have a strong incentive in the future to increase pipeline efforts so that full capacity can be supplied out of either strait.
3
liuniao 6 days ago +2
Where are you getting 10% from?  The roughly 20% number that’s thrown around is supposed to only be the strait, and doesn’t include any pipelines as far as I’ve seen.
2
SporksInjected 6 days ago +2
Yanbu and the east west pipeline are now running at full capacity, diverting from the strait to the Red Sea basically. This is a similar situation for the Abu Dhabi crude oil pipeline.
2
meerkat2018 5 days ago +1
We aren’t seeing effects nearly as severe as some people were predicting ($200 oil prices, global economic collapse, etc), because: 1. there was oversupply of oil before the war that is now just correcting with actual necessity. 2. There is still plenty of other flexible supply of crude oil. Currently there is no global deficit, and markets have corrected after panic went away.
1
leisurechef 5 days ago +2
It’s probably another 2-4 weeks until the real oil shock effects bite into the global economy
2
AdPure5645 5 days ago +2
That's not how it works. If you pull 20% then everyone who might have reduced fuel is trying to buy more from the central market. Basically poorer countries lose first.
2
Lonely_Sale9707 5 days ago +1
That’s how it worked before this war. Shortages change everything. Same with food, as you say, shortages f*** the poor first while the wealthy pay higher prices.
1
Embarrassed_Ninja608 6 days ago +1
you right, but i hope you also got my point
1
Lonely_Sale9707 6 days ago +89
Terrible article doesn’t mention what any of it entails. Anyone know?
89
ErrorReplaceUser 6 days ago +87
Here's the full plan (in Dutch) https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-678dcaef892da479047e6810d3fe0028949434ef/pdf In phase 1 it is just closer monitoring of the situation and activating the organization in preparation of actual matters if things get worse.
87
JaxStrumley 6 days ago +50
It just means the government start preparations so that IF a crisis occurs, there are plans in place. So no concrete measures at this point.
50
escfantasy 6 days ago +32
First phase of plan: start planning!
32
Influenz-A 6 days ago +5
It is like every first item on the TO DO list: \- Create TO DO list
5
_IronClaw_ 6 days ago +1
Or as some other orange-lover would say: "There's an outline of a plan"
1
jaydizzz 6 days ago
Its a plan of plan really, nothing of substance. Lowering tax on petrol is out of the question though they said, yet we got the highest prices in Europe. Half of the country fuels up abroad. Good thing we have a lot of bicycles, we’re gonna need them soon.
0
Jolly-Way8443 6 days ago +4
Never heard of this news outlet as an dutchie, alot of standard blabla without explanation.
4
RomulusAndThe3Makane 6 days ago +171
Phase one : bike even harder !
171
adhoc_pirate 6 days ago +72
Phase two: even more windmills!
72
[deleted] 6 days ago +38
[deleted]
38
Spoztoast 6 days ago +5
Step 4: ride water bikes on the canals
5
Beflijster 6 days ago +2
step 5: If we feed the good folks at Rijkswaterstaat enough LSD they can probably create a lazy river type of ride by opening all the locks and switching on the right pumping stations (remember the time they reversed the Leidsche Rijn?) Going round and round the Randstad. Distribute old car tires among the population, or maybe confiscate those round things from the Elfteling's Pirana. Commuter problem completely solved! That or bring back the [trekschuit.](https://cultuur.middendelfland.net/trekvaarten/trekvaarten06.jpg)
2
Beflijster 6 days ago +2
"Koek-en-verzuipie" kiosks.
2
matap821 6 days ago +2
Maybe the windmills will keep them cool during the summer
2
LGAflyer 6 days ago +1
Windmills do not work that way!
1
Zouden 5 days ago +1
Not with that attitude!
1
JR21K20 5 days ago +1
Literally my reaction to this is deciding I can just get an e-bike for getting to work lol
1
MarienBean 6 days ago +36
TLDR: Nothing is done yet, only monitoring the situation for now.
36
Flicksterea 5 days ago +6
Australia's already at Level 2 of ours. It's sad that we just have to accept this new reality because of one incredibly insecure and pathetic man.
6
Minimum_Leadership51 6 days ago +11
Germany, as always, also working hard on their crisis plan: Doing nothing. 
11
plomplomLP 6 days ago +5
Even worse: subsidize fuel demand!
5
mczero80 5 days ago +1
Exactly what I thought.
1
Expando3 6 days ago +4
Grow tulips 🌷
4
Embarrassed_Ninja608 6 days ago +6
Feels like 2019
6
TxM_2404 6 days ago +6
You mean 1973?
6
_9a_ 6 days ago +1
But my license plate ends in a letter, what day do I get to fill up?
1
Open-Armadillo9921 6 days ago +2
But what is actually the plan? I don't get which measures they implement
2
johnsmith1234567890x 6 days ago
Well work from home mandate would be start
0
TomorrowFinancial468 5 days ago +2
Its time for Congress to get some f****** balls and remove this daughter f*****
2
Top-Handle4786 6 days ago +1
Off-topic, but I've been wondering this ever since this started.... Why can't the tankers just not go through that particular strait? Or is that the only way to reach the producers on that part of the planet?
1
MrMarriott 6 days ago +7
1 out of 5 barrels of oil come from there. 1 out 3 liters of of all diesel comes from there. 
7
FireTyme 6 days ago +3
to put things in perspective: about 10 weeks of the worlds aviation fuel supply has been stopped or wiped out since the war started as well as about 2 weeks of all road traffic
3
mmoonbelly 6 days ago +2
On the positive side, at some point that lack of burnt hydrocarbons will reduce this year’s CO2 emissions. (It’s not intentional by the US president, who’s Gung-ho for oil, but at least it’s an unintended consequence)
2
FireTyme 6 days ago
that’s just unfounded. the amount of waste the military operations have produced far outweighs any minor decline in oil production.
0
10yearsnoaccount 6 days ago +1
You might want to actually do the numbers on that....
1
FireTyme 6 days ago +1
sure. > War is not often described in environmental terms, but it should be. Modern conflict is carbon-intensive at nearly every stage: the extraction and refinement of fuel, the manufacturing of weapons, the movement of ships and fighter jets across long distances, and perhaps more obviously: the detonation of explosives, the fires that follow and the long process of rebuilding all that has been destroyed. > This suggests that fires like the refinery blaze circulating on social media can release thousands of tons of CO₂ equivalent depending on duration and intensity, along with a complex mix of particulate matter, heavy metals and toxic compounds that linger long after the flames subside. War does not reduce emissions. It rearranges them. > The environmental damage extends beyond carbon accounting. Explosions release heavy metals and fine particulates into the air and soil. Fires can burn for days, spreading pollution across wide areas. Damaged infrastructure—water systems, industrial facilities energy networks—can leak contaminants that take years to remediate. These effects accumulate quietly, embedding themselves in ecosystems and in human health. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2026/04/15/the-environmental-cost-of-war/#:~:text=This%20suggests%20that%20fires%20like,often%20inconsistently%20captured%20or%20obscured. ' > Recent studies are beginning to fill this data gap. A 2024 analysis of Israel’s war on Gaza estimated that the first 120 days of fighting generated between 420,265 and 652,552 tonnes of CO2 emissions, which is more than the annual emissions of 26 countries combined [3]. When including emissions from pre-war construction and projected post-war reconstruction, the total rises to over 47 million tonnes, surpassing the yearly combined emissions of 135 countries [3]. > Similarly, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has produced at least 175 million tonnes of CO2 emissions over two years, equivalent to the annual emissions of the Netherlands. These estimates include direct military fuel use, emissions from fires, and the vast quantities of steel and cement required for rebuilding communities and cities [8].' https://climatalk.org/2025/09/15/how-are-wars-affecting-climate-change/#:~:text=Recent%20studies%20are%20beginning%20to,communities%20and%20cities%20%5B8%5D.
1
Feligris 6 days ago +6
It's a narrow strait to a dead-end gulf (the Persian Gulf) with the harbours well beyond it, so yes, they can't physically take another route. And Iran borders pretty much all of the gulf on one side too, IIRC, which means they can target anything which moves through it. The other oil-producing countries effectively have no other functional sea access thanks to geography and borders, and while I recall there is an oil pipe towards the Mediterranean it has limited capacity and was also disabled by an attack from Iran at one point. Nobody has bothered to spend the money and resources for alternatives because so far the situation has been manageable even if it's a "single point of failure".
6
Heizard 6 days ago +6
Even if they where filled in different place - any other place has less capacity to fill them. That region is like worlds gas station, everything else compare to that is just a dude with a bucket.
6
Laksu_ja_Molliamet 6 days ago +17
Do you have access to Google Maps?
17
redditscraperbot2 6 days ago +3
Kind of a dismissive response to a genuine question. The actual answer is that tanking that much fuel across a desert isn't financially viable. The entire infrastructure of those countries is geared towards shiping it via boat. Sure you *can* drive it across the desert but that would take a long time to set up the infrastructure to make it cost effective. Building a pipeline would also work but I don't think I need to say what would happen to a very long and stationary pipeline in a time of war. (they also take a long time to build and have limited capacity.)
3
Swarna_Keanu 6 days ago +3
They move very, very slow. Oil in use today has started shipping many, many months past. All alternative routes take significantly longer. So ... eventually there's a long gap where no oil arrives.
3
terenceill 5 days ago +1
Phase 1: we leave everyone increasing prices of everything
1
-Wiseone- 6 days ago +1
What's the plan? Gather 40 countries together, arrange consensus between 40 governments, sail the navy, free the world, we're all free. No more oil.
1
Downtown-Sell5949 6 days ago -1
Yet our government still thinks that America is our ally lmao.
-1
← Back to Board