· 162 comments · Save ·
For Sale Apr 18, 2026 at 3:20 PM

Dwayne Johnson Says ‘Real Masculinity’ Means Supporting Warrior Women as ‘Moana’ Surfs to CinemaCon

Posted by Puzzled-Tap8042


Dwayne Johnson Says ‘Real Masculinity’ Means Supporting Warrior Women as ‘Moana’ Surfs to CinemaCon
Variety
Dwayne Johnson Says ‘Real Masculinity’ Means Supporting Warrior Women as ‘Moana’ Surfs to CinemaCon
Dwayne Johnson delivered a thoughtful speech about the responsibility of men to empower women during Disney's "Moana" presentation at CinemaCon.

🚩 Report this post

162 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
MisterFingerstyle 1 day ago +220
I support women. I can’t support a shot-for-shot remake of a modern Disney classic with horrible effects. I’ll rewatch the original.
220
baz4k6z 18 hr ago +13
In the future, we'll get the same remakes but in multiple versions as AI slop
13
wheaman 7 hr ago +1
I hate how correct you probably are lol
1
fuck_ur_portmanteau 23 hr ago +16
Just that green screen screenshot is awful, it’ll make hundreds of millions but they can’t go to the effort of going on location.
16
YoungKeys 22 hr ago +9
What they did to Mulan was even worse. Just stop remaking these into live actions altogether.
9
ScreenMuch90210 13 hr ago +1
Whoah, you watched one?
1
chum_slice 13 hr ago +3
I bought the animated version in bluray because it was that good. This feels like a live concert with lip syncing. I refuse to pay for that and I’ll refuse to pay for this
3
AirportBarTarry 17 hr ago +2
Kinda felt this way until I saw the shot-for-shot How to Train Your Dragon remake now I’m back in
2
CuriousAttorney2518 20 hr ago +3
Funny cuz for the amount of people that don’t want shot for shot we have the opposite that do.
3
Commercial-Co 10 hr ago +1
Thats every disney remake
1
Marples3 18 hr ago
Shot-for-shot live action can actually be a good choice. It honors the original. I liked how to train your dragon did it.
0
CIA-pizza-party 13 hr ago
A modern Disney classic that is barely ten years old... Can it even be called a classic at this point? The internet says something “classic” can be defined as something old that still remains popular so…
0
sufinomo 22 hr ago -6
idk man im excited for it
-6
Icy-Whale-2253 1 day ago +157
As a father of daughters™
157
ColonelQuaraitch 22 hr ago +21
“I just wanted to say that off… is the direction that you can f***!” - Rocky
21
MRintheKEYS 22 hr ago +7
Single best line from his entire Final Boss era
7
Flashy_Jello_9520 9 hr ago +2
I don’t remember this line in project Hail Mary.
2
C__Wayne__G 21 hr ago +5
“I’m the father of a daughter. And the son of a mother”
5
HellovahBottomCarter 1 day ago +118
I haven’t really been paying any attention to this live action Moana abomination- mostly because I sincerely thought the awful screenshot of Dwayne dressed as a dime store Maui was either AI slop or some fan’s take on the idea. But the fact that this is real? The turnover from animated movie to needless live action remake seems to have zero actual delay anymore. I understand the original Moana came out a decade ago… but that’s still drastically faster than previous animation to live action abomination. The original is still perfect. So . . . Why?
118
Troyabedinthemornin 1 day ago +32
As Mr Crabs would say, “because money”. Most of these movies turn a pretty huge profit, like Lilo and stitch, regardless of quality, and they are easy to produce because the story and music is already there. Plus you have an all new wave of merchandising. Disney adults will watch anything, and kids don’t care either so it’s a sure bet for the company
32
RottenPingu1 20 hr ago +3
It works if you can market them to distinct segments but it never works within the same audience. Ask the Japanese anime industry.
3
Troyabedinthemornin 20 hr ago +2
We’ll see. All of these live action remakes are marketed to the same people and other than Snow White and I believe Mulan (but that’s covid) they’ve all been successful
2
Veronome 1 day ago +8
Every live action remake has made money hand over fist. As long as they move tickets, they'll get made, regardless of any artistic or creative merit.
8
Potential-Bird-5826 1 day ago +11
I suspect it's because the Rock is getting too old to even pretend like he could be Maui in live action and he doesn't want anyone else to do it. Maybe that's cynical of me, but that's what I believe 
11
IncurableAdventurer 23 hr ago +4
I wouldn’t just say it’s just him who doesn’t want anyone else to play Maui. No one else can. That role was meant for him and he was great. I think all the executives and a lot of fans know that
4
Potential-Bird-5826 23 hr ago +4
"No one else can" is a loaded statement when we have a sample size of 1. You might be right, it's possible that amongst 8 billion humans only the Rock could ever do the role justice. I'm not quite as prepared as you to state it categorically.
4
IncurableAdventurer 23 hr ago +2
Polynesian male actor does narrow it down Edit: and I imagine they wrote the role with him in mind. I can be very wrong about that though
2
spinbutton 6 hr ago +1
I'm sure they wrote the role for him. But I'm sure there are many people of Polynesian descent who act. New Zealand has a good many
1
Potential-Bird-5826 22 hr ago -1
Fair point. Still, I don't think there's any role performed so iconically that I wouldn't give another actor a chance to prove me wrong about that. Still, I suppose it doesn't matter. The Rock has the role, I was merely speculating as to why I think he specifically wanted to do the live action version and I think it has to do with his age more than anything else. In another 10 years, he really will be too old to be an immortal jacked demigod. Edit: Well, someone is unhappy with my opinion. Doesn't change it though
-1
RiseRattlesnakeArmy 17 hr ago +1
His daughters didn't believe that he played Maui so now he is proving it
1
cmarkcity 23 hr ago +8
They keep on remaking incredibly recent films, yet refuse to breathe new life into under appreciated classics. Theres no way in hell I’m paying to see live action Moana, but I’d genuinely love to see something like Hunchback, Atlantis, Treasure Planet, Aristocats, Hercules, Rescuers, Great Mouse Detective, Emperors New Groove, or Black Cauldron. But if their C-suite can’t guarantee it’s gonna break a billion in the box office they won’t even bother
8
neuronexmachina 18 hr ago +2
  > Hercules Apparently the Russo Brothers had been [working with Disney on this](https://movieweb.com/live-action-hercules-remake-russo-brothers-disney/), but it seems to be stuck in development hell.
2
lowtoiletsitter 16 hr ago +2
No Aristocats You'll end up with a hybrid of The (new) Lion King and Cats
2
neuronexmachina 18 hr ago +1
It hasn't occured to me before, but a live-action Atlantis or Treasure Planet would be amazing.
1
Jirachibi1000 21 hr ago +3
Lilo and Stitch live action is a movie they shot c**** for disney+ but put in theaters last second. It is slightly above a Disney Channel movie. It made a BILLION DOLLARS. A BILLION. And thats WITH bad word of mouth.
3
goomyman 13 hr ago +2
People really like those characters and they have been under under utilized
2
officer897177 19 hr ago +3
It probably wouldn’t feel as rushed if they gave their franchises a rest at any point. The second a new IP hits it big, it gets hooked up to the Disney milking machine and it doesn’t stop until the bones are dust. I would bet real money that a frozen live action will be announced this year.
3
lowtoiletsitter 16 hr ago +1
Whats bi?
1
waffle_iron_maiden 20 hr ago +2
I saw an edited version of the trailer with color grading more accurate to the animated movie and it improved the entire presentation. I am not always against live action adaptations if they're done with passion not just for a quick buck, but I really wish they hadn't washed out the colors of Moana just because it's live action now. Moana is a vibrant movie in a good way, live action should be no exception
2
trevmustdie 22 hr ago +3
I despise it because it seems they consider live action to be the superior form of artistic medium compared to animation. You dont see them making animated versions of live action. The results have and will always be worse. Worse acting, worse body language and movement compared to the infinite possibilities in animation. And they even decide to change the writing, things like with Lilo and Stich.. always for the worst. This is the most repulsive phase of movie making
3
Unlucky_Clover 23 hr ago +2
To me, the fact that it’s the same actors and the trailer looks the same as the animated version, it’s just a boring cash grab with this live action one. Just, what’s the point?
2
Luci-Noir 15 hr ago +1
It’s an abomination because you don’t want to see it? 🙄
1
HellovahBottomCarter 15 hr ago
Sure, Jan.
0
tschesky 9 hr ago +1
Because people watch them. Save for maybe Mulan, most of this trash makes over a billion dollars in box office (Lilo and Stich, Lion King, Aladin). So no matter how many comment sections are butthurt about it, people vote with their walllet, lol.
1
SaiyanKnight23 7 hr ago +1
Wait…IT CAME OUT A DECADE AGO?!!!! *fades to dust*
1
druidmain69420 23 hr ago +1
They sell. Are you about to tell cinema owners that the movies which fill seats are just gonna go away because they dont meet some arbitrary measure of quality?
1
IncurableAdventurer 23 hr ago
Well, to be fair, they needed to make the remake soon. I very much dislike live action remakes*, but I wasn’t upset when hearing about Moana. No one can be Maui besides Dwayne Johnson. They need to make it when he still can easily reprise his role, and I’m sure they’re thinking of the sequel(s). I prefer them not doing it at all, but we all know they eventually will, so do it now while they still can get him *well, How To Train Your Dragon was pretty good, but it was basically a shot for shot remake of the animated one haha
0
anillop 23 hr ago
Because they could get live action rock to play Maui. What else do you need? A lifetime of stereo abuse is catching up with the rock and he is rapidly weathering away into a far less substantial but more sustainable form. Maui was jacked so they needed the last hurrah of whatever elephant hormones they’ve been injecting him with.
0
Muted-Signature-8084 1 day ago +195
I thought real masculinity was pumping your body full of designer steroids to gain the approval of others.
195
axhiro 1 day ago +69
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU THINK (solves verbal dispute with violence)
69
KruleDiablo 1 day ago +20
I mean if you're a pro wrestler pretty much everything you do is for the approval of others it's in the job description
20
Rokursoxtv 1 day ago +8
Not if you're a heel 😀
8
PropDad 20 hr ago +4
Also having your nipples digitally removed for a movie.
4
Fubar236 1 day ago +12
Jabroni
12
so-much-wow 1 day ago +6
No, it's never losing a fight.
6
Ikarus3426 23 hr ago
No that's just for getting insanely rich.
0
flappinginthewind 1 day ago +86
Look, we should absolutely support women. The Rock using a challenge of masculinity as a marketing ploy to get people to see a remake of a Disney movie, is a f****** hollow attempt at supporting women. Also, is it not real masculinity to support women who aren't warriors?
86
LowMeridian 1 day ago +9
He’s not trying to get men to see it, he’s trying to prevent the usual sexist tidal wave that comes from grown men whenever these kinds of movies come out. You know. Children’s movies where women are exercising a little more strength and agency than your average princess from the 1930s 🙄
9
Fickle_Goose_4451 1 day ago +14
The movie is going to be ripped to shreds because its yet another clear cash grab remake. This one more obvious than other due to the age of the original. The rock is going to be ripped to shreds because hes mostly lost his fan base. The critical drinker chuds will probably b**** about the female lead because thats their brand.
14
dafones 1 day ago +2
Yeah is the Critical Drinker just a full out misogynist? YouTube was feeding me some of his reviews and commentary, but he sure seems to hate female leads.
2
TheCuzzyRogue 14 hr ago +1
The best part is his one attempt at being a director was everything he complains about others doing.
1
[deleted] 23 hr ago -2
[deleted]
-2
Own-Masterpiece305 21 hr ago +6
>I don't really think most movies are going to get made if they're not going to make some money back. The problem is when studios like Disney take this to the extreme to maximize profits. Their calculus changes so that creative vision become practically worthless as opposed to "marketable product" slop. 
6
Fickle_Goose_4451 17 hr ago +3
>This feels like an overly cynical way to look at things. That might be true if we werent already sitting on a dozen examples of that being exactly what disney does.
3
Troyabedinthemornin 1 day ago +2
Yeah, I don’t care if the Rock is saying this cynically or not, the point is he said something and it’s nice to see a star of his caliber, who has tried to be as palatable to as many people as possible make a stand. Because at the end of the day, it’s his young co-star that is going to be the target of every grifter and chud out there so if he can take some heat off it’s a good thing. This movie is likely gonna be cheeks, but that’s not because “TherEs a GiRl iN It”
2
LowMeridian 1 day ago +2
Oh yeah I agree with you, I’m happy he’s making a statement at all. The reason behind the statement (misogyny) is what I’m criticizing
2
Troyabedinthemornin 1 day ago +2
Oh yeah! No disagreement here, I was just building off your point and addressing what the other guy was saying
2
AtmosphereDue1694 11 hr ago +1
I don’t see how this does it though.
1
Potential-Bird-5826 1 day ago +8
Moana don't surf, she sails.
8
chief_yETI 1 day ago +9
why is everyone getting so angry in the comments lol
9
CuriousAttorney2518 20 hr ago +4
Cuz it’s Listnook, where people depressed about their lives go to ruin everyone else’s lives with their negativity
4
Remote-Letterhead844 21 hr ago +1
I'll take a guess - during the 2024 election, The Rock went on Fox News and refused to endorse either side. Essentially.... both sideserism. Many saw that as shitty given how he has presented himself and what he supported in the past.
1
SqueakBoxx 1 day ago +17
Dwayne Johnson doesn't know what real masculinity is. if he did he wouldn't have to have clauses in his movie contracts stating that his character can't lose a fight.
17
FictionFantom 1 day ago +1
You haven’t seen the Smashing Machine have you? Because he definitely loses.
1
ChineseCosmo 1 day ago +6
Yeah but that was his very intentional Oscar-bait movie. Very different beast from The Fast and the Furious, where he’s competing against like 5 other bald beefcakes,
6
ColonelQuaraitch 22 hr ago +1
Fast and Furious… the franchise where he loses several times?
1
ChineseCosmo 21 hr ago
Name one
0
ColonelQuaraitch 20 hr ago +3
To Vin Diesel in Fast Five.
3
FictionFantom 1 day ago -4
Except the claim is that he can’t lose any fights in his movies. You just moved the goalpost.
-4
ChineseCosmo 23 hr ago +4
I’m not the guy who originally posted. He was speaking in broad terms. I’m clarifying. It is well documented that Dwayne Johnson is very brand-conscious and did not want to “lose” in movies (look up his beef with Vin Diesel). But there are exceptions to this rule. The Smashing Machine being one of them. It’s like if someone says “Tom Cruise is a bankable action star” and you come at them with “well actually, he was a comic relief character in Tropic Thunder, you are wrong!” The exceptions prove the rule.
4
Beginning-Sound-7516 1 day ago +1
I haven’t seen it but for the first roughly 20 years of his career that was indeed in his contract.. he has used his star power to literally have movies rewritten over it
1
FictionFantom 1 day ago +3
And movies like *Skyscraper* would have been better had he gotten his ass kicked? Why do people pretend like they care about stuff that they’ll never bother to watch anyway?
3
FrankSamples 1 day ago +14
Read all the comments in here and tell me we don’t live in an era of hyper cynicism and negativity I don’t understand what everyone is angry about
14
IntroducingHagleton 1 day ago +6
Anger is the baseline state on the internet. 
6
FictionFantom 1 day ago +5
Well he went on Fox News one time (actually they came to him in a press junket) and didn’t endorse anyone in the last election. Literally Hitler /s.
5
Prince_of_Pirates 21 hr ago +3
They probably don't understand either. Anger is their default state.
3
EstablishmentOne3884 14 hr ago +4
He can say what he wants; I support whatever I see fit. And I don't see fit to support this and Disney's other nonsense.
4
LowMeridian 1 day ago +35
Crazy that he has to say this because he knows a bunch of grown men are going to fling sexist vitriol at a literal children’s movie
35
ElGoddamnDorado 22 hr ago +6
Pretyy sure he's doing it to sell movie tickets. It's kinda gross. Another instance of co-opting feminism just to make money. Was there even much backlash for the original Moana when it came out? I didn't hear much
6
NotVerySmarts 1 day ago +13
I was at work and heard a guy going off on the Little Mermaid live action movie being cast with a black actor. He couldn't believe it, he just kept saying "Black Mermaid?!?" like someone had changed the colors of the American flag or something. I told him mermaids weren't real, so it didn't matter what colors they were.
13
No_Use_9652 1 day ago +13
Crazy that you think that’s why he said this lol. The man is desperately searching for good headlines. Has anyone seen comments about the issue of masculinity and Moana? Because I haven’t until the rock brought up this totally unprompted “issue” about a movie he happens to be in.
13
rysker6 1 day ago -14
You totally say everything is WOKE WOKE don’t you?
-14
BotomsDntDeservRight 17 hr ago +3
I can't support an actor who plays the same character in his every movie
3
Joelredditsjoel 16 hr ago +3
Dwayne Johnson has not said sincere thing in 30 years.
3
bigntazt 14 hr ago +3
Everything this dude says now feels like it's been A-B tested by multiple PR teams.
3
BeMyBrutus 14 hr ago +3
I agree with the general statement. But I can't help but think of how phony The Rock is every time he speaks. I mean this is the guy who pretended to never have eaten In-n-Out, and put a plug for Black Adam in his tweet about the queen dying.
3
bonemech_meatsuit 1 day ago +3
The irony of a man using women empowerment to sell tickets to a movie. How about just supporting women in general regardless of whether they are warriors.
3
heeheemf 23 hr ago -1
I think the point he's trying to get to is that being against empowered women on screen is some loser shit that "real men" love to do all the time but really shouldn't, but he's being so indirect and PR about it kinda comes off as performative... and it kinda is cause he's trying to sell tickets. Just say women are awesome and deserve stories of them being such. Or even better just let them prove it... or if you wanna call out fragile alpha males do it with your chest. This is just kinda nothing idk why anyone feels particularly crazy about it 
-1
blewwholeload 1 day ago +8
His commitment to soulless marketing is amusing to me ngl
8
jiminycricket1940 22 hr ago +2
Live action Moana will make gobs of money; but it will not be due to it being good nor necessary.
2
Optimal_Whiner 22 hr ago +2
Meh. I supported and enjoyed the animated ones. I have no interest in this live action movie.
2
PKblaze 22 hr ago +2
That may be so, but I won't be supporting the movie.
2
GoneTillNovember32 22 hr ago +2
Funny he makes this statement when there’s money to be made for himself
2
BakedPotatoDutton 20 hr ago +2
Says the guy who has his characters can't lose fights written into his contract...
2
Jhawk38 18 hr ago +2
They are phoning the remakes in for sure. Absolute low effort movies.
2
Terminator7786 17 hr ago +2
Real masculinity is letting your characters take the L instead of being a baby who has to win 100% of the time.
2
Robynsxx 17 hr ago +2
It also means not having clauses in your film contracts that you can’t lose a fight in fear of looking “weak”, so I’m not sure Dwayne knows what masculinity is. But then again, even a broken clock is right twice a day…
2
mimd-101 17 hr ago +2
Certainly. Always good to have some lady who can kick ass. But letting them throw your previous costar under the bus over not having the correct blood quantum, who could play the role and had done nothing wrong, wasn't "masculine". It was greedy and cruel.
2
Cor_Seeker 16 hr ago +2
I love many of the animated Disney movies but I'm not supporting these obvious cash grabs and copyright extensions. Johnson is just saying that because he needs a hit movie.
2
holden_mcg 14 hr ago +2
So if we don't go to see it, we're not real men? Manipulate much, Dwayne. Oh, and f*** off.
2
Alina2017 1 day ago +3
I know he starred in the animated version but I don't know why they thought it was necessary to cast Dwayne and his stupid wig in the remake. There are plenty of Polynesian men who can actually sing who would have been great as a live action Maui.
3
Impossible-Animator6 1 day ago +2
DJ will say whatever it needs to sell his movie. Dude cares about nothing but his image & money.
2
Ok_Literature3138 23 hr ago +3
He’s a mega celebrity. His opinion is irrelevant. He doesn’t live an average life. Go start a brand or something. Don’t tell me what a man is.
3
GriveousDance21 1 day ago +4
All this to promote a soulless live-action cashgrab of a remake of an animated classic that's not even 10 years old. Bravo Dwayne, may the change of hierarchy of power in the Disney Universe aid you.
4
Sad-Math-2039 1 day ago +4
Real masculinity doesn't include a legal contract that you can't lose on screen. Pathetic. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni65106428/
4
Fun_Description_385 1 day ago +4
"real masculinity is pumping your hard earned cash at over priced movie theatres to see my dog shit acting" Get fucked, Dwayne.  Genuinely can't wait till he's out of the spotlight.
4
flower4000 1 day ago +2
“Watch this movie or your sexist” bro, I liked the original, i really hate Disney live action remakes sorry my dude but no. I’d rather Disney go the opposite route and do 2d remakes. Use the CGI as a prototype to see if ppl like a story and then put in the work to hand animate the movie sketch by sketch if is worth the effort, not make a lazier longer shittier version with less art. But I guess wanting to see movies that don’t feel like cash grabs w bad cgi makes me hate women I guess.
2
InflationClassic9370 1 day ago +2
Please stop acting.
2
Right_Layer_9700 1 day ago +1
Warrior woman movies have been around since the dawn of film.
1
ZangiefZangief 23 hr ago +1
That’s a great message
1
Derpykins666 23 hr ago +1
Whenever we get this type of talk before one of their live action remakes comes out, the movie is always bad. I really like the OG Moana movie, it's really good. This live action isn't necessary, the movie is just about to be 10 years old. I feel like whenever the actors start yappin' about politics, morals, or other mannerisms before the movie comes out it just cheapens the whole experience and is usually an indicator that they really don't or can't say much about the movie, or that they know the movie probably isn't good.
1
CP_Chronicler 23 hr ago +1
Good message, but sadly tied to the promotion of a movie, and a bad-looking DisneySlop live-action remake no less.
1
Cavaquillo 23 hr ago +1
He just wants his check, which he’ll get more of the more he convinces people they’re helping a woman warrior. Tell me Rock, are you making more than Moana’s actress for the movie? If so, he better get to supporting the warrior
1
Tight_Writer249 22 hr ago +1
I always hope when they remake any animated film into live action, that the live action looses money. Here is a new idea. How about create a new IP instead of beating the old one to death.
1
Unusual-Ad4890 22 hr ago +1
I was hoping for another banger tweet like the one he gave tribute to the late Queen Elizabeth
1
CrustyTh3Punk 20 hr ago +1
Why is her hair so straight?
1
GGunner723 20 hr ago +1
“Come see this soulless cash-grab remake or you’re not a real man.”
1
Sliver80 20 hr ago +1
But will it make this soulless live action remake good tho?
1
AMonitorDarkly 20 hr ago +1
That’s not the reason people are trashing this.
1
Original_Mulberry652 19 hr ago +1
Ight. How about instead of changing the conditions of being a man so they arent toxic anymore we do even better and accept that that being a man isn't dependent on any conditions beyond being a man in of itself and that we do good things like supporting people simply because it's a decent thing to do, no need to bring our ballsacks into it.
1
JohnCenaJunior 19 hr ago +1
The Dwayne says, "Watch my movie or you're not manly."
1
Unchosenone7 17 hr ago +1
No one wants to see this cause we’re tired of the c**** live action remake infinite money glitch, not because we’re against supporting strong women.
1
JageshemashFTW 16 hr ago +1
I appreciate The Rock being a feminist icon, but I feel like the corporate greed that results in these live action remakes is kinda separate from the patriarchy.
1
Due-Blackberry8056 16 hr ago +1
Let's give this person the Pulitzer Prize immediately.
1
hot-black-coffee 15 hr ago +1
Dwayne Johnson is a sellout. I don’t care what he thinks real masculinity is.
1
HmmmmGoodQuestion 13 hr ago +1
I thought that real masculinity meant never losing a fight on camera?
1
daroach1414 13 hr ago +1
I couldn’t be any less excited for live action Moana and I really liked the animated one.
1
GarethGobblecoque99 12 hr ago +1
The hierarchy of feminism universe is about to change
1
GasPsychological5997 11 hr ago +1
Moana is perfect no one needs this.
1
TheSolarExpansionist 9 hr ago +1
It’s literally the exact same Movie, without the cuteness. I’ll watch it in Halloween when it’s free on D+
1
0694U 7 hr ago +1
This guy makes a living playing make believe, how do his opinions matter on anything?
1
Atticus_Spiderjump 6 hr ago +1
"Real masculinity means watching my movie"
1
Raindog66 1 day ago +1
Then why is Dwayne a maga turd?
1
PhaseSixer 1 day ago +1
Hes not
1
chickenfrybunch 1 day ago +1
Real masculinity is not letting someone else define my own masculinity for me.
1
Original_Mulberry652 19 hr ago +1
Why do we need to put someone's manhood on a tier list based on whether or not they meet certain criteria(even if those criteria indicate good character). It's still seems kinda of unhealthy. It's pretty weird to do something like donate to charity and then make it about your ballsack.
1
UpstairsConnection57 1 day ago +1
Except he choked a woman for insulting his father at a family wedding some 25 or so years ago. He also cheated on his ex-wife with his current wife. Her friends claim she admitted that he beat her on occasion as well. He also had k**** violent sex back in his younger days which included choking women. He is not the feminist hero people are trying to make him out to be.
1
Background-Sock4950 1 day ago +1
Does “supporting warrior women” include equal pay for his co-star
1
Jazzlike-Vacation230 18 hr ago +1
Not burning down an entire island worth of land to buy up land c**** is also Real Masculinity
1
Commercial_Hippo398 16 hr ago +1
Great job weaponizing feminism to sell movie tickets, buddy.
1
Brigadierz- 9 hr ago +1
“Real masculinity means me making money.”
1
NoTitleChamp 1 day ago
Real masculinity isn't just voicing support for female led movies when you're in one. Real masculinity also isn't going on Faux News talking about "wokeness".
0
rysker6 1 day ago -1
I’m sure MAGA will react with nothing but decency to this quote
-1
ehrgeiz91 22 hr ago
Didn’t he shill for republicans?
0
MPD1987 20 hr ago
And yet he hobnobs with the Saudi Arabian royalty. Please do not fall for his faux-feminism BS. 🤮
0
PsychologicalEbb3140 19 hr ago
Oh so Hollywood’s going back to this type of marketing again?
0
Kalorama_Master 15 hr ago
Remember “The Rock” was MAGA and still is a “conservative” Very disturbing considering he has a daughter
0
Lfsnz67 23 hr ago -1
That's great Dwayne, now time to go on Fox News and complain about Joe Biden again
-1
GMGarry_Chess 1 day ago -11
Total nonsense. Real masculinity is being a leader, protector, and provider, taking action, and handling business. Supporting others is not part of it, nor is pretending to be someone you're not. That doesn't mean if a woman wants to be a warrior you should try to stop her, but supporting her in that is not part of being masculine.
-11
Fickle_Goose_4451 1 day ago +3
No to supporting others, but yes to protecting and providing for them? Seems like a well thought out definition.
3
GMGarry_Chess 1 day ago
what does supporting someone else's goals have to do with being a protector or provider?
0
napalmnacey 1 day ago -3
Well that’s a load of twaddle.
-3
← Back to Board