· 25 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events Mar 27, 2026 at 5:26 PM

Epstein survivors launch class-action lawsuit against Trump and Google after their names appeared in the files

Posted by Silly-avocatoe

Epstein survivors sue Trump and Google after their names appeared in DOJ files
The Independent
Epstein survivors sue Trump and Google after their names appeared in DOJ files
After DOJ ‘outed’ the names of dozens of victims, the search engine giant failed to prevent their information from circulating online, including in AI-generated content, plaintiffs allege
🚩 Report this post

25 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
BrandenWi Mar 27, 2026 +280
The survivors should band together and doxx every last one of their attackers publicly. Doing so will damage any future court cases against those people, but it should be obvious by now that the legal system in this country has failed them, in favor of protecting the billionaires.
280
00Oo0o0OooO0 Mar 27, 2026 +76
The woman who claimed Epstein made her have sex with other people died last year, but she named all the names she could.
76
GnosticDoomsayer Mar 27, 2026 +17
Which were?
17
00Oo0o0OooO0 Mar 27, 2026 +75
Prince Andrew, George Mitchell, Bill Richardson, Les Wexner, Glenn Dubin, Thomas Pritzker, Marvin Minsky, and Jean-Luc Brunel. She also accused Alan Dershowitz, but later acknowledged that may have been a mistake.
75
dokikod Mar 27, 2026 +17
Google Sharlene Rochard on Jen Psaki's show. She is a survivor and spoke out for the first time. It is so damning. I tried to copy the link to YouTube, but I must have done something wrong.
17
Ganrokh Mar 28, 2026 +8
I believe you're looking for this: https://youtu.be/Yoi4aUZ0EDM
8
dokikod Mar 28, 2026 +1
Thank you.
1
Ancient-Bat1755 Mar 27, 2026 +32
I’d rather they get long term justice and continue those efforts than a short term entertainment fix that gets forgotten about or helps dismiss cases.
32
LowZombie2 Mar 27, 2026 +38
Going by previous events and evidence I’d say there’s a good chance that doxxing their abusers is the ONLY justice available to them. Our justice system (not just trump because this shit has been going on for awhile now) seems hell bent on sweeping this shit under the rug.
38
Adultery Mar 27, 2026 +20
Case in point: “Epstein was first arrested in 2006 in Florida, leading to his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution.” They didn’t know who this guy was before they released him back into the wild? Yeah. Right.
20
NotACreepyOldMan Mar 27, 2026 +12
They aren’t going to get long term justice, it’s been 40 years of this.
12
Ancient-Bat1755 Mar 27, 2026 +5
Also true
5
BrandenWi Mar 27, 2026 +5
Exactly which part of what's happened thus far makes you think that getting long term justice is actually in the cards for them, at all.
5
Still_Front197 Mar 27, 2026 +2
I’m sorry but it’s time to wake up. It’s been time
2
orbutuo Mar 27, 2026 +3
Billionaire pedophiles*. Name them correctly
3
RandomlyMethodical Mar 27, 2026 +67
Publishing victim names really seems intentional given how thorough they've been with redacting the names of perpetrators.
67
Proper-District8608 Mar 27, 2026 +23
I agree. That kid from DOGE said in hearing that DOGE used chatgpt whatever system and just plugged in names and words to whipe out all things Trump wanted funding cut from (dei, gay, women etc) they probably did same here which 'took months of the best people working hard' for a computer to do it screw it up by parameters inputed
23
LesterGrossman_ Mar 28, 2026 +4
Don T
4
TheNotoriousFAP Mar 27, 2026 +31
This was by design. Predators and abusers love to point the finger at the victim while claiming they were the one who was victimized all along.
31
Olaf4586 Mar 27, 2026 +9
What did Google do?
9
Usual-Wasabi-6846 Mar 27, 2026 +14
Kept the information cached online where it could be accessed by AI and Google Searches. Google didn't respond to voluntary requests by the victims to delete the caches. I personally think them trying to sue Google is stupid. We will see what courts rule in probably a couple years.
14
Olaf4586 Mar 28, 2026 +1
Interesting Seems pretty flimsy to me. I don't know what the case law is, but I imagine there's legal precedent for whether search engines are liable for the 'speech' of their search results, and I imagine they are not found liable. Otherwise, anytime a libelous article was ever published the plaintiff could sue every search engine that returns it. Perhaps they're trying to argue that LLM results are separate from search results and can be considered speech, but I don't know.
1
Usual-Wasabi-6846 Mar 28, 2026 +1
I think there's a good argument for Google with precedent (Florida Star vs BJF) that once released by the government even if they violated the law by releasing them the information would become part of the public record and any publishers can not be held liable for posting it.
1
NotThatAngel Mar 28, 2026 +4
They are probably worried they'll be targeted for punishment, unlike the billionaires whose names appear in the Epstein file. They'll be just fine. They have an entire political party protecting them.
4
Rusty3414 Mar 27, 2026 +1
The DOJ probably did it on purpose so they would sue the government and not trump.
1
← Back to Board