· 36 comments · Save ·
News & Current Events May 7, 2026 at 3:23 PM

EU weighs restricting use of US cloud platforms to process sensitive government data, sources tell CNBC

Posted by goldstarflag


EU weighs restricting use of U.S. cloud platforms to process sensitive government data, sources tell CNBC
CNBC
EU weighs restricting use of U.S. cloud platforms to process sensitive government data, sources tell CNBC
There have been increasing calls within Europe for the region's most critical workloads to diversify away from dominant U.S. cloud providers.

🚩 Report this post

36 Comments

Sign in to comment — or just click the box below.
🔒 Your email is never shown publicly.
[deleted] 6 days ago +55
[removed]
55
CavemanMork 6 days ago +16
I was having this conversation at work recently and imo is nonsensical to put all of a companies computing platform into the hands of another company. That goes doubly for governments and foreign companies, trump has simply highlighted the issue.
16
MsSelphine 6 days ago +6
I mean let's be real, computing, especially webserving, REALLY benefits from economies of scale. The issue is less the idea of cloud computing, and more that everyone uses the exact same providers. Its a security and reliability choke point
6
CavemanMork 6 days ago +7
Yeah I agree, additionally what happens when the company who now is fundamental to your entire computing environment decides to double costs? You're screwed, at least untill you can migrate to a different provider which can on large scale environments take years.
7
HotPen8106 5 days ago +2
Most smart companies are in agreements that lock in their pricing at the SKU level. Source, I have worked on many of these deals across all three major cloud providers. Also more notes.... Any large scale environment is using more than one cloud and likely a mix of public and private. Cloud to cloud migrations where you're essentially just copy pasting and not optimizing that workload is super easy and would absolutely not take years, even in the biggest companies. Any company with no contingency plan for that scenario at this point in human history deserves to go out of business. Business continuity plans are far from new....
2
[deleted] 5 days ago -1
[removed]
-1
CavemanMork 5 days ago +1
I agree with you completely, the benefits of cloud are clear as is the prevelance of cloud computing in business. None of that changes the downsides though.
1
Jesus_on_a_biscuit 6 days ago +1
Who owns the remaining 20%? For those who want avoid the big 3, where do we go?
1
[deleted] 6 days ago
[removed]
0
227CAVOK 5 days ago +2
MS sovereign cloud is still subject to US cloud act.
2
FollowingFeisty5321 6 days ago +38
So Trump's put in jeopardy: - cloud platforms - payment networks - desktop operating systems I wonder if Apple and Google can rein Trump in before they come for smartphones too...
38
abbzug 6 days ago +19
Defense industry as well.
19
[deleted] 6 days ago +6
[removed]
6
FollowingFeisty5321 6 days ago +13
I'm referring to Android and iOS powering roughly 100% of all smartphones in Europe.
13
BlackHotSoup3000 6 days ago +7
As a US citizen, I hope this cripples US Tech.
7
AirborneSysadmin 6 days ago +8
How are they not already restricting this? I work in contracting for the \_US\_ government and there us a f****** three ring circus worth of hoops to jump through to use ANY cloud service.
8
Heavenfall 6 days ago +6
From the beginning there have been limits on classified information, which had to be enforced on a country/institution level. Then GDPR set certain limits on personal information, regulated on an EU level. When the EU talks about digital sovereignty, they now also include data which in itself is not classified, or personal information, but data which must be governed locally to ensure access and recovery in times of crisis or war. This is already enacted in many EU countries on a per institution level. They are now suggesting that the EU will formally declare certain sector as always being applicable for this. This would immediately force an exit from all deals that are in the wrong for all EU organizations covered by certain national preparedness acts. For example, consider that overnight 80+% of organizations will have to move away from any non-EU tech that supports salary payments and financial transfers. Or relying on Teams for communication or perhaps even Exchange servers. Or perhaps even Windows Server software for handling such data.
6
Brief_Hospital_1766 6 days ago +7
WTF! Wtf is this restrictions c***? There should be NO restrictions at all. American owned and operated cloud services should be banned from all EU governments as quickly as possible.
7
StrangerConscious637 6 days ago +5
Don't trust Russia and USA! Both are evil now.
5
-drunk_russian- 6 days ago +10
*Now?* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Rights_Record_of_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_by_the_CIA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Orlando_Letelier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_by_the_CIA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States edit: no country is free of atrocities at one point or another, but what irks me is the "American Exceptionalism" that makes 'Muricans (particularly WASP males) act like their shit don't stink and they're the chosen ones like they're Homelander. A lot of people first learned about the Tulsa race massacre from the Watchmen and/or Lovecraft Country TV shows. Like, it's scary how willfully ignorant the people of the USA are about the horrors their own government inflicted upon its own citizens, let alone the rest of the world. Signed, a Third Worlder that lives in a country that *still* is messed up from the USA meddling in its politics decades ago. edit 2: A small TL;DR for those in a hurry: * The USA experimented on babies and pregnant women by injecting them with radioactive substances * The USA military experimented with syphilis on black people (surprise surprise) and withdrew treatment when antibiotics were discovered * The USA toppled democratic governments, and assassinated (or assisted in the killing of) journalists and diplomats * The USA funded terrorist organizations by selling cocaine in impoverished (AKA black) neighborhoods * The USA hasn't officially declared war since WWII, so the Korean, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, etc... aren't "wars"... seems familiar with a certain "Special military operation".
10
EquivalentArea1782 5 days ago -5
Sounds like you have a small obsession. Citing Wikipedia is wild, by the way. You can start by removing yourself from Listnook, which is an American company.
-5
-drunk_russian- 5 days ago +1
>Sounds like you have a small obsession. Just a small case of 'tism, nothing to worry about, have a good day.
1
uberusepicus 6 days ago +1
That would make my job very interesting:)
1
YappingOldMan 5 days ago +1
Meanwhile our idiotic leaders in the Netherlands insist on having an American company maintain critical applications containing personal info of all Dutchies 🤦‍♂️
1
lethalized 6 days ago +1
I f****** wish they would bring in the IT guy and ask him about these things at times...
1
siedenburg2 6 days ago +4
Which one, the one who can't do his job because he only knows how to use aws, azure or google, or the one who told "I wouldn't to that, with that we will be dependent from services that can go offline or increase prices whenever they want"?
4
[deleted] 6 days ago +1
[deleted]
1
noir_lord 6 days ago +2
1 man, the entire party that silently (or overtly) supports him and the 70 odd million Americans who voted for him. He's a symptom, not the disease.
2
DaveVdE 5 days ago +1
He’ll take the credit, too.
1
noir_lord 5 days ago +1
Oh when he dies, it'll be a race to the nearest mic from the entire republican party to say "I always knew he was a wrong 'un". Then they'll fight over the remains, I don't see anyone who can replicate whatever fucked up weird hold Trump has over them either but there is always another populist grifter in the wings, I just hope the next one isn't smarter.
1
Hapten 6 days ago -1
How many people actually read the article? This only applies to government and public‑sector use which is pennies when you look at it from the hyperscalers POV. I am more surprised that they haven't done this and are still using US cloud platforms.
-1
Possible-Fudge-2217 6 days ago +2
You can't force the private sector, it's still a free market economy. First we need to get our own services up to speed, then (or better now) we can start taxing US services to ensure our services are competitive. Biggest issue will be to offer seemless migration and be scalable according to business demand.
2
BlackHotSoup3000 5 days ago +1
Except they can force the private sector and they force the private sector to do things all the time...with laws. It isn't a true free market.
1
Possible-Fudge-2217 5 days ago +1
It's regulated, but regulation often serve fairness (however you may define that). And having options is all in the idea of such a regulated free market, hence not forcing the private sector is the norm. Also, you'd seriously damage the private sector as migrations can be painful especially if forced and not well planned.
1
BlackHotSoup3000 5 days ago
Well since your moved the goal posts from "can't force" to "regulate for fairness" I'll address that. There's plenty of examples of regulations that serve to benefit donors/friends of those who make the laws, which has nothing to do with fairness (However you may define it). Also, a lot of the private sector is currently feeling a lot of pain due to reliance on energy from russia/iran and reliance on defense/technology/trade from the US. Its not very smart to be on the bad side of someone that controls your technology infrastructure.
0
Possible-Fudge-2217 5 days ago
I think I used hedging... pretty certain I wrote OFTEN serve not exclusively. Obviously, there are lobbyist trying to get advantages. Or just genral corruption. The private sector always takes risks, it's their responsibility to factor it in (and whem they don't you'll probably still see tax money spend to subsidize their mistake). Anyway, the public sector is the one that should definetly ensure souvereignity when possible. Nowadays that's not fully possible due to our globalized world. Leaves the question of using an underdevelopef service vs the risk of not having souvereignity.
0
← Back to Board